A simplified diagnosis algorithm for dysbetalipoproteinemia

Evaluation of biochemical algorithms to screen dysbetalipoproteinemia in ε2ε2 and rare APOE variants carriers

OBJECTIVES

Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a combined dyslipidemia associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases mostly occurring in ε2ε2 subjects and infrequently in subjects with rare APOE variants. Several algorithms have been proposed to screen DBL. In this work, we compared the diagnostic performances of nine algorithms including a new one.

METHODS

Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their APOE genotype: ε2ε2 ("ε2ε2", n=49), carriers of rare variants ("APOEmut", n=20) and non-carriers of ε2ε2 nor APOE rare variant ("controls", n=115). The algorithms compared were those from Fredrickson, Sniderman, Boot, Paquette, De Graaf, Sampson, eSampson, Bea and ours, the "Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL) algorithm". Our gold standard was the presence of a ε2ε2 genotype or of a rare variant associated with triglycerides (TG) >1.7 mmol/L. A replication in the UK Biobank and a robustness analysis were performed by considering only subjects with both TG and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDLc) >90th percentile.

RESULTS

Total cholesterol (TC)/ApoB and NHDLC/ApoB are the best ratios to suspect DBL. In ε2ε2, according to their likelihood ratios (LR), the most clinically efficient algorithms were the HCL, Sniderman and De Graaf's. In APOEmut, Sniderman's algorithm exhibited the lowest negative LR (0.07) whereas the HCL's exhibited the highest positive LR (29). In both cohorts, the HCL algorithm had the best LR.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed a powerful algorithm based on ApoB concentration and the routine lipid profile, which performs remarkably well in detecting ε2ε2 or APOE variant-related DBL. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate algorithms performances in DBL carriers of infrequent APOE variants.

Genetic risk score in patients with the APOE2/E2 genotype as a predictor of familial dysbetalipoproteinemia

BACKGROUND

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is an autosomal recessive (rarely dominant) inherited disorder that is almost exclusively associated with the apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) variability. Nonetheless, only a small proportion of APOE2/E2 subjects develop the phenotype for mixed dyslipidemia; the context of other trigger metabolic or genetic factors remains unknown.

METHODS

One hundred and one patients with FD and eighty controls (all APOE2/E2 homozygotes; rs429358) were screened for 18 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within the genes involved in triglyceride metabolism.

RESULTS

Two SNPs were significantly associated with the FD phenotype (rs439401 within APOE; P < 0.0005 and rs964184 within ZPR1/APOA5/A4/C3/A1 gene cluster; P < 0.0001). Unweighted genetic risk scores - from these two SNPs (GRS2), and, also, additional 13 SNPs with P-value below 0.9 (GRS15) - were created as an additional tool to improve the risk estimation of FD development in subjects with the APOE2/E2 genotype. Both GRS2 and GRS15 were significantly (P < 0.0001) increased in patients and both GRSs discriminated almost identically between the groups (P = 0.86). Subjects with an unweighted GRS2 of three or more had an almost four-fold higher risk of FD development than other individuals (odds ratio (OR) 3.58, 95% confidence interva (CI): 1.78-7.18, P < 0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified several SNPs that are individual additive factors influencing FD development. The use of unweighted GRS2 is a simple and clinically relevant tool that further improves the prediction of FD in APOE2/E2 homozygotes with corresponding biochemical characteristics.

Composition and distribution of lipoproteins after evolocumab in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reduce fasting and post fat load cholesterol in non-HDL and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD). However, the effect of PCSK9 mAbs on the distribution and composition of atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with FD is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 mAb evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in patients with FD on fasting and post fat load lipoprotein distribution and composition.

METHODS

Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. Patients received an oral fat load at the start and end of each treatment period. Apolipoproteins (apo) were measured with ultracentrifugation, gradient gel electrophoresis, retinyl palmitate and SDS-PAGE.

RESULTS

PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced particle number of all atherogenic lipoproteins, with a stronger effect on smaller lipoproteins than on larger lipoproteins (e.g. IDL-apoB 49%, 95%confidence interval (CI) 41-59 and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-apoB 33%, 95%CI 16-50). Furthermore, PCSK9 mAbs lowered cholesterol more than triglyceride (TG) in VLDL, IDL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (e.g. VLDL-C 48%, 95%CI 29-63%; and VLDL-TG 20%, 95%CI 6.3-41%). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect the post fat load response of chylomicrons.

CONCLUSION

PCSK9 mAbs added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in FD patients significantly reduced lipoprotein particle number, in particular the smaller and more cholesterol-rich lipoproteins (i.e. IDL and LDL). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect chylomicron metabolism. It seems likely that the observed effects are achieved by increased hepatic lipoprotein clearance, but the specific working mechanism of PCSK9 mAbs in FD patients remains to be elucidated.

Applicability of Diagnostic Criteria and High Prevalence of Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia in Russia: A Pilot Study

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is a highly atherogenic genetically based lipid disorder with an underestimated actual prevalence. In recent years, several biochemical algorithms have been developed to diagnose FD using available laboratory tests. The practical applicability of FD diagnostic criteria and the prevalence of FD in Russia have not been previously assessed. We demonstrated that the diagnostic algorithms of FD, including the diagnostic apoB levels, require correction, taking into account the distribution of apoB levels in the population. At the same time, a triglycerides cutoff ≥ 1.5 mmol/L may be a useful tool in identifying subjects with FD. In this study, a high prevalence of FD was detected: 0.67% (one in 150) based on the ε2ε2 haplotype and triglycerides levels ≥ 1.5 mmol/L. We also analyzed the presence and pathogenicity of APOE variants associated with autosomal dominant FD in a large research sample.

Consensus document for lipid profile testing and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories: What parameters should a basic lipid profile include?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

Consensus document for lipid profile testing and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

Consensus document for lipid profile determination and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories. What parameters should be included in a basic lipid profile?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

Consensus document for lipid profile testing and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories: what parameters should a basic lipid profile include?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

[Consensus document for lipid profile determination and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories]

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

Consensus document for lipid profile determination and reporting in Spanish clinical laboratories. What parameters should be included in a basic lipid profile?

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) continue to be the main cause of death in our country. Adequate control of lipid metabolism disorders is a key challenge in cardiovascular prevention that is far from being achieved in real clinical practice. There is a great heterogeneity in the reports of lipid metabolism from Spanish clinical laboratories, which may contribute to its poor control. For this reason, a working group of the main scientific societies involved in the care of patients at vascular risk, has prepared this document with a consensus proposal on the determination of the basic lipid profile in cardiovascular prevention, recommendations for its realization and unification of criteria to incorporate the lipid control goals appropriate to the vascular risk of the patients in the laboratory reports.

Documento de consenso para la determinación e informe del perfil lipídico en laboratorios clínicos españoles

Las enfermedades cardiovasculares (ECV) siguen siendo la principal causa de muerte en nuestro país. El control adecuado de las alteraciones del metabolismo lipídico es un reto clave en prevención cardiovascular que está lejos de alcanzarse en la práctica clínica real. Existe una gran heterogeneidad en los informes del metabolismo lipídico de los laboratorios clínicos españoles, lo que puede contribuir al mal control del mismo. Por ello, un grupo de trabajo de las principales sociedades científicas implicadas en la atención de los pacientes de riesgo vascular, hemos elaborado este documento con una propuesta básica de consenso sobre la determinación del perfil lipídico básico en prevención cardiovascular, recomendaciones para su realización y unificación de criterios para incorporar los objetivos de control lipídico adecuados al riesgo vascular de los pacientes en los informes de laboratorio. Palabras clave: consenso, panel de lípidos, enfermedades cardiovasculares, bioquímica, colesterol, lípidos, triglicéridos, lipoproteína (a).

Diagnosis of Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia Based on the Lipid Abnormalities Driven by APOE2/E2 Genotype

BACKGROUND

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FDBL) is a monogenic disease due to variants in APOE with a highly variable phenotype. Current diagnostic lipid-based methods have important limitations. The objective is twofold: to define characteristics of dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) based on the analysis of APOE in patients from a lipid unit and in a sample from the general population, and to propose a screening algorithm for FDBL.

METHODS

Lipids and APOE genotype from consecutive unrelated subjects from Miguel Servet University Hospital (MSUH) (n 3603), subjects from the general population participants of the Aragon Workers Health Study (AWHS) (n 4981), and selected subjects from external lipid units (Ext) (n 390) were used to define DBL criteria and to train and validate a screening tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects from MSUH, 21 subjects from AWHS, and 31 subjects from Ext were APOE2/2 homozygous. The combination of non high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDLc)/apoB 1.7 plus triglycerides/apoB 1.35, in mg/dL (non-HDLc [mmol/L]/apolipoprotein B (apoB) [g/L] 4.4 and triglycerides [mmol/L]/apoB [g/L] 3.5), provided the best diagnostic performance for the identification of subjects with hyperlipidemia and APOE2/2 genotype (sensitivity 100 in the 3 cohorts, and specificity 92.8 [MSUH], 80.9 [AWHS], and 77.6 [Ext]). This improves the performance of previous algorithms. Similar sensitivity and specificity were observed in APOE2/2 subjects receiving lipid-lowering drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of non-HDLc/apoB and triglycerides/apoB ratios is a valuable tool to diagnose DBL in patients with hyperlipidemia with or without lipid-lowering drugs. FDBL diagnosis requires DBL and the presence of a compatible APOE genotype. Most adult APOE2/2 subjects express DBL, making FDBL as common as familial hypercholesterolemia in the population.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement in Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia

AIM

To compare LDL-C concentrations using the Friedewald formula, the Martin-Hopkins formula, a direct assay and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PGGE) to the reference standard density gradient ultracentrifugation in patients with Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) patients. We also compared non-HDL-cholesterol concentrations by two methods.

METHODS

For this study data from 28 patients with genetically confirmed FD from the placebo arm of the EVOLVE-FD trial were used. Four different methods for determining LDL-C were compared with ultracentrifugation. Non-HDL-C was measured with standard assays and compared to ultracentrifugation. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the methods.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 28 FD patients was 62 ± 9 years, 43 % were female and 93 % had an ɛ2ɛ2 genotype. LDL-C determined by Friedewald (R² = 0.62, p <0.01), Martin-Hopkins (R² = 0.50, p = 0.01) and the direct assay (R² = 0.41, p = 0.03) correlated with density gradient ultracentrifugation. However, Bland-Altman plots showed considerable over- or underestimation by the four methods compared to ultracentrifugation. Non-HDL-C showed good correlation and agreement.

CONCLUSION

In patients with FD, all four methods investigated over- or underestimated LDL-C concentrations compared with ultracentrifugation. In contrast, standard non-HDL-C assays performed well, emphasizing the use of non-HDL-C in patients with FD.

Effect of evolocumab on fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia

BACKGROUND

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is the second most common monogenic lipid disorder (prevalence 1 in 850-3500), characterized by postprandial remnant accumulation and associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Many FD patients do not achieve non-HDL-C treatment goals, indicating the need for additional lipid-lowering treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy on fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins in patients with FD.

METHODS

A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. At the start and end of each treatment period patients received an oral fat load. The primary endpoint was the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C area under the curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints included fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins.

RESULTS

In total, 28 patients completed the study. Mean age was 62±9 years and 93% had an Ɛ2Ɛ2 genotype. Evolocumab reduced the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C AUC with 49% (95%CI 42-55) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) AUC with 47% (95%CI 41-53). Other fasting and absolute post fat load lipids and lipoproteins including triglycerides and remnant-cholesterol were also significantly reduced by evolocumab. However, evolocumab did not have significant effects on the rise above fasting levels that occurred after consumption of the oral fat load.

CONCLUSIONS

Evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy significantly reduced fasting and absolute post fat load concentrations of non-HDL-C, apoB and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins in FD patients. The clinically significant decrease in lipids and lipoproteins can be expected to translate into a reduction in CVD risk in these high-risk patients.

Dysbetalipoproteinemia Is Associated With Increased Risk of Coronary and Peripheral Vascular Disease

CONTEXT

Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a disorder in which remnant lipoproteins accumulate in the plasma due to a genetic apolipoprotein E dysfunction in conjunction with the presence of secondary metabolic factors. An increased risk of both coronary and peripheral vascular disease (PVD) has been observed in these patients in retrospective studies.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to compare the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and PVD in a cohort of patients with DBL compared with normolipidemic controls. As a secondary objective, the incidence of ASCVD and PVD was compared between patients with DBL and patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).

METHODS

A total of 221 patients with DBL, 725 patients with FH, and 1481 normolipidemic controls were included in the study. The data were obtained by review of medical records.

RESULTS

In patients with DBL, there was an overall excess risk of PVD (hazard ratio [HR] 13.58, 95% CI 4.76-38.75) and ASCVD (HR 3.55, 95% CI 2.17-5.83) (P < .0001) when compared with normolipidemic controls. When compared with patients with FH, an increased risk of PVD (HR 3.89, 95% CI 1.20-12.55, P = .02) was observed in patients with DBL.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the risks of ASCVD and PVD in DBL are >3-fold and >13-fold higher, respectively, than normolipidemic controls. Furthermore, the risk of PVD is ∼4-fold higher in DBL than in FH. Adequate screening of DBL is imperative to improve the clinical care of these patients by preventing the development of ASCVD.

Clinical heterogeneity in monogenic chylomicronaemia

Chylomicronaemia accompanies hypertriglyceridaemia, usually due to a polygenic predisposition in combination with secondary risk factors. Monogenic chylomicronaemia represents a small subgroup of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. This article describes three patients and illustrates the heterogeneity in the presentation of monogenic chylomicronaemia. The first case is a man with mild hypertriglyceridaemia who is a compound heterozygote for two variants in the LMF1 gene, without relevant medical history. The second case is a woman who is a double heterozygote of variants in the LPL and APOA5 genes. She experienced pancreatitis. The third case is a man, with recurrent pancreatitis attributed to severe hypertriglyceridaemia and homozygous for a variant in the APOC2 gene. This article highlights that in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, the absence of pancreatitis or the presence of mild hypertriglyceridaemia does not exclude monogenic chylomicronaemia. Genetic screening should be considered in patients with unexplained or severe hypertriglyceridaemia, to determine appropriate treatment and follow-up.

Diagnosis of remnant hyperlipidaemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, there has been interest for the development of simplified diagnosis algorithms of dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) in order to avoid the complex testing associated with the Fredrickson criteria (reference method). The purpose of this review is to present recent advances in the field of DBL with a focus on screening and diagnosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, two different multi-step algorithms for the diagnosis of DBL have been published and their performance has been compared to the Fredrickson criteria. Furthermore, a recent large study demonstrated that only a minority (38%) of DBL patients are carriers of the E2/E2 genotype and that these individuals presented a more severe phenotype.

SUMMARY

The current literature supports the fact that the DBL phenotype is more heterogeneous and complex than previously thought. Indeed, DBL patients can present with either mild or more severe phenotypes that can be distinguished as multifactorial remnant cholesterol disease and genetic apolipoprotein B deficiency. Measurement of apolipoprotein B as well as APOE gene testing are both essential elements in the diagnosis of DBL.

Establishing the relationship between Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia and genetic variants in the APOE gene

Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is the second most common monogenic dyslipidemia and is associated with a very high cardiovascular risk due to cholesterol‐enriched remnant lipoproteins. FD is usually caused by a recessively inherited variant in the APOE gene (ε2ε2), but variants with dominant inheritance have also been described. The typical dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype has a delayed onset and requires a metabolic hit. Therefore, the diagnosis of FD should be made by demonstrating both the genotype and dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype. Next Generation Sequencing is becoming more widely available and can reveal variants in the APOE gene for which the relation with FD is unknown or uncertain. In this article, two approaches are presented to ascertain the relationship of a new variant in the APOE gene with FD. The comprehensive approach consists of determining the pathogenicity of the variant and its causal relationship with FD by confirming a dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype, and performing in vitro functional tests and, optionally, in vivo postprandial clearance studies. When this is not feasible, a second, pragmatic approach within reach of clinical practice can be followed for individual patients to make decisions on treatment, follow‐up, and family counseling.

Dysbetalipoproteinemia: Differentiating Multifactorial Remnant Cholesterol Disease From Genetic ApoE Deficiency

CONTEXT

Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is characterized by the accumulation of remnant lipoprotein particles and associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). DBL is thought to be mainly caused by the presence of an E2/E2 genotype of the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene, in addition to environmental factors. However, there exists considerable phenotypic variability among DBL patients.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives were to verify the proportion of DBL subjects, diagnosed using the gold standard Fredrickson criteria, who did not carry E2/E2 and to compare the clinical characteristics of DBL patients with and without E2/E2.

METHODS

A total of 12 432 patients with lipoprotein ultracentrifugation as well as APOE genotype or apoE phenotype data were included in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Among the 12 432 patients, 4% (n = 524) were positive for Fredrickson criteria (F+), and only 38% (n = 197) of the F+ individuals were E2/E2. The F+ E2/E2 group had significantly higher remnant cholesterol concentration (3.44 vs 1.89 mmol/L) and had higher frequency of DBL-related xanthomas (24% vs 2%) and floating beta (95% vs 11%) than the F+ non-E2/E2 group (P < 0.0001). The F+ E2/E2 group had an independent higher risk of PVD (OR 11.12 [95% CI 1.87-66.05]; P = 0.008) events compared with the F+ non-E2/E2 group.

CONCLUSION

In the largest cohort of DBL worldwide, we demonstrated that the presence of E2/E2 was associated with a more severe DBL phenotype. We suggest that 2 DBL phenotypes should be distinguished: the multifactorial remnant cholesterol disease and the genetic apoE deficiency disease.

Lipid measurements in the management of cardiovascular diseases: Practical recommendations a scientific statement from the national lipid association writing group

Lipoprotein measurements are pivotal in the management of patients at risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) with myocardial infarction and coronary death as the main outcomes, and for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), which includes CHD and stroke. Recent developments and changes in guidelines affect optimization of using lipid measures as cardiovascular biomarkers. This scientific statement reviews the pre-analytical, analytical, post-analytical, and clinical aspects of lipoprotein measurements. Highlights include the following: i) It is acceptable to screen with nonfasting lipids. ii) non-high-density lipoprotein HDL-cholesterol (non-HDL-C) is measured reliably in either the fasting or the nonfasting state and can effectively guide ASCVD prevention. iii) low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) can be estimated from total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) measurements. For patients with LDL-C>100 mg/dL and TG ≤150 mg/dL it is reasonable to use the Friedewald formula. However, for those with TG 150-400 mg/dL the Friedewald formula for LDL-C estimation is less accurate. The Martin/Hopkins method is recommended for LDL-C estimation throughout the range of LDL-C levels and up to TG levels of 399 mg/dL. For TG levels ≥400 mg/dL LDL-C estimating equations are currently not recommended and newer methods are being evaluated. iv) When LDL-C or TG screening results are abnormal the clinician should consider obtaining fasting lipids. v) Advanced lipoprotein tests using apolipoprotein B (apoB), LDL Particle Number (LDL-P) or remnant cholesterol may help to guide therapeutic decisions in select patients, but data are limited for patients already on lipid lowering therapy with low LDL-C levels. Better harmonization of advanced lipid measurement methods is needed. Lipid measurements are recommended 4-12 weeks after a change in lipid treatment. Lipid laboratory reports should denote desirable values and specifically identify extremely elevated LDL-C levels (≥190 mg/dL at any age or ≥160 mg/dL in children) as severe hypercholesterolemia. Potentially actionable abnormal lipid test results, including fasting triglycerides (TG) ≥500 mg/dL, should be reported as hypertriglyceridemia. Appropriate use and reporting of lipid tests should improve their utility in the management of persons at high risk for ASCVD events.

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: highly atherogenic and underdiagnosed disorder

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is a genetic, highly atherogenic disorder. The penetrance of FD depends on the patient’s lifestyle and concomitant diseases. Despite the fact that FD was described almost half a century ago, it is still insufficiently studied and is extremely rarely diagnosed. In actual clinical practice, physicians do not have clear understanding of clinical course and genetic basis of FD. The aim was to present the most complete, but at the same time a critical review with a modern view on FD. We analyzed Russian and foreign publications from following electronic databases: PubMed, eLIBRARY, Google Scholar. As a result, the phenotypic features and genetic variability of the disease were considered and the main issues of diagnosis and treatment of patients with FD were discussed. The data presented will help the clinician to timely suspect the FD, conduct a full range of investigations and prescribe evidence-based lipid-lowering therapy.

Dysbetalipoproteinemia and other lipid abnormalities related to apo E

Dysbetalipoproteinaemia (or type III hyperlipoproteinaemia) is a severe mixed hyperlipidaemia resulting from the accumulation of remnant chylomicron and VLDL particles in plasma, also called β-VLDL. It is caused by a defect in the recognition by hepatic LDL and lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) of β-VLDL. Mutations in the APOE gene, especially in subjects homozygous for the ɛ2/ɛ2 allele, are responsible for this lack of receptor recognition. Dysbetalipoproteinaemia represents 2-5% of the mixed dyslipidaemias seen in Lipid Units, is highly atherogenic and predisposes to diffuse atheromatosis, either coronary, peripheral vascular, or carotid, so early diagnosis and treatment is necessary. The presence of hypertriglyceridaemia, with non-HDL cholesterol/apolipoprotein B ratios>1.43 (in mg/dL) followed by APOE genotyping is the method of choice in the diagnosis of dysbetalipoproteinaemia. It is a dyslipidaemia that responds well to hygienic-dietary treatment, although the combination of statin and fenofibrate is often necessary to achieve optimal control.

Genetics of hypertriglyceridemia and atherosclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The relationship between elevated triglyceride levels (i.e. hypertriglyceridemia) and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) has been investigated for decades. Recent genetic studies have sought to resolve the decades-old question of a causal relationship.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic studies seem to demonstrate associations between elevated triglyceride levels and ASCVD risk. Mendelian randomization studies suggest this association may be causal. However, simultaneous pleiotropic effects of metabolically linked lipid variables - such as non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein B and HDL cholesterol -- often go unaccounted for in these studies. Complex underlying pleiotropic interactions of triglycerides with these lipid fractions together with unmeasured intercalated nonlipid-related mechanisms, such as inflammation and coagulation, impair the ability of genetic studies to implicate a direct role for triglycerides on ASCVD risk. One potential mechanism seems largely driven by the cholesterol carried within triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and their remnants, rather than their triglyceride content.

SUMMARY

Although the exact mechanisms linking elevated triglyceride levels to ASCVD remain to be determined, new therapeutics that reduce triglyceride levels might be advantageous in certain patients. Newer investigational triglyceride-lowering therapies derived from human genetics target key proteins, such as apo C-III and ANGPTL3. Although these treatments clearly lower triglyceride levels, their efficacy in atherosclerotic risk reduction remains unproven.

Adiposity and the development of dyslipidemia in APOE ε2 homozygous subjects: A longitudinal analysis in two population-based cohorts

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD), characterized by remnant lipoprotein accumulation and premature cardiovascular disease, occurs in homozygous carriers of the APOE ε2 allele, but genetic predisposition alone does not suffice for the clinical phenotype. Cross-sectional studies suggest that a second metabolic hit - notably adiposity or insulin resistance - is required, but the association between these risk factors and development of FD has not been studied prospectively.

METHODS

For this study, we evaluated 18,987 subjects from two large prospective Dutch population-based cohorts (PREVEND and Rotterdam Study) of whom 118 were homozygous APOE ε2 carriers. Of these, 69 subjects were available for prospective analyses. Dyslipidemia - likely to be FD - was defined as fasting triglyceride (TG) levels >3 mmol/L in untreated subjects or use of lipid lowering medication. The effect of weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-TG metabolic syndrome on development of dyslipidemia was investigated.

RESULTS

Eleven of the 69 ε2ε2 subjects (16%) developed dyslipidemia - likely FD - during follow-up. Age-, sex- and cohort-adjusted risk factors for the development of FD were BMI (OR 1.19; 95%CI 1.04-1.39), waist circumference (OR 1.26 95%CI 1.01-1.61) and presence of non-TG metabolic syndrome (OR 4.39; 95%CI 1.04-18.4) at baseline. Change in adiposity during follow-up was not associated with development of dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Adiposity increases the risk of developing an FD-like lipid phenotype in homozygous APOE ε2 subjects. These results stress the importance of healthy body weight in subjects at risk of developing FD.

Importance of the triglyceride level in identifying patients with a Type III Hyperlipoproteinemia phenotype using the ApoB algorithm

BACKGROUND

Hyperlipoproteinemia Type III (HLP3), also known as dysbetalipoproteinemia, is defined by cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) enriched remnant lipoprotein particles (RLP). The gold standard for diagnosis requires demonstration of high remnant lipoprotein particle cholesterol (RLP-C) by serum ultracentrifugation (UC), which is not readily available in daily practice. The apoB algorithm can identify HLP3 using total cholesterol (TC), plasma triglyceride (TG), and apoB. However, the optimal TG cutoff is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed apoB algorithm defined HLP3 at different TG levels to optimize the TG cutoff for the algorithm.

METHODS

128,485 UC lipid profiles in the Very Large Database of Lipids (VLDbL) were analyzed. RLP-C was assessed at TG ≥ 133 mg/dL, ≥175 mg/dL, ≥200 mg/dL, and ≥ 250 mg/dL. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and prevalence adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) were calculated against UC Criterion (VLDL-C/TG ≥ 0.25) for HLP3.

RESULTS

The median age (IQR) was 57 years (46-68). 45% were men, 20.1% had diabetes, and 25.5% had hypertension. The median RLP-C level for the TG cutoffs (mg/dL) of ≥ 133, ≥ 175, ≥ 200, and ≥ 250 were 34, 43, 50, and 62 mg/dL, respectively, compared to 67 mg/dL in UC defined HLP3. TG ≥ 133 mg/dL yielded optimal results (Sn 29.5%, Sp 98.5%, PABAK 0.96, PPV 13.6%, NPV 99.4%).

CONCLUSION

TG ≥ 133 mg/dL allows for high sensitivity in screening for HLP3. Higher TG cutoffs may identify more severe HLP3 phenotypes, but with a large loss in sensitivity for HLP3.