Role of lipoprotein lipase activity measurement in the diagnosis of familial chylomicronemia syndrome

An overview of persistent chylomicronemia: much more than meets the eye

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of severe hypertriglyceridemia presenting in the form of chylomicronemia that persists despite treatment of secondary causes and the use of conventional lipid-lowering treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Persistent chylomicronemia is a rare syndromic disorder that affects carriers of bi-allelic combinations of pathogenic gene variants impairing lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity, as well as a significant number of individuals who do not meet this genetic criterion. It is associated with a high risk of acute pancreatitis and other morbidities. Effective innovative treatments for severe hypertriglyceridemia are being developed and are becoming available. Patients with persistent chylomicronemia of any cause respond equally to next-generation therapies with LPL-independent mechanisms of action and do not generally respond to conventional LPL-dependent treatments.

SUMMARY

Not all individuals with persistent chylomicronemia carry a proven pathogenic combination of gene variants that impair LPL activity. Documenting the clinical characteristics of people with persistent chylomicronemia and their response to emerging therapies is essential to correctly establish their risk trajectory and ensure equitable access to personalized treatment.

Pathogenicity assessment of genetic variants identified in patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia: Novel cases of familial chylomicronemia syndrome from the Dyslipidemia Registry of the Spanish Atherosclerosis Society

PURPOSE

Genetic testing is required to confirm a diagnosis of familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS). We assessed the pathogenicity of variants identified in the FCS canonical genes to diagnose FCS cases.

METHODS

245 patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia underwent next-generation sequencing. Preliminary variant pathogenicity criteria and classification, based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, were obtained online and verified. Phenotype evaluation was based on lipoprotein lipase activity deficiency, a clinical score, and/or type I hyperlipoproteinemia determined in 25 patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-four biallelic variants were analyzed. Evidence-based criteria allowed the reclassification of 8 likely pathogenic (LP) variants in the LPL, APOA5, and LMF1 genes into pathogenic (P) and the change of 2 variants of uncertain significance (VUS) to LP. Conversely, 2 variations in LMF1 remained as VUS. Additionally, 1 variant in LPL and 2 in GPIHBP1 were likely benign. Twenty FCS cases had biallelic P/LP variants and 1 patient, with an FCS phenotype, harbored biallelic VUS. FCS was excluded from 4 patients with pathogenic/likely benign combinations.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of the clinical and biochemical features of patients with variants in the FCS canonical genes allowed a confident variant classification that helped in the diagnosis of novel FCS cases.

Genetic basis of hypertriglyceridemia

The development of massive sequencing techniques and guidelines for assessing the pathogenicity of variants are allowing us the identification of new cases of familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) mostly in the LPL gene, less frequently in GPIHBP1 and APOA5, and with even fewer cases in LMF1 and APOC2. From the included studies, it can be deduced that, in cases with multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS), both loss-of-function variants and common variants in canonical genes for FCH contribute to the manifestation of this other form of chylomicronemia. Other common and rare variants in other triglyceride metabolism genes have been identified in MCS patients, although their real impact on the development of severe hypertriglyceridemia is unknown. There may be up to 60 genes involved in triglyceride metabolism, so there is still a long way to go to know whether other genes not discussed in this monograph (MLXIPL, PLTP, TRIB1, PPAR alpha or USF1, for example) are genetic determinants of severe hypertriglyceridemia that need to be taken into account.

Genetic variants in triglyceride metabolism genes among individuals with hypertriglyceridemia in Colombia

BACKGROUND

The genetic substrate of severe hypertriglyceridemia (sHTG) in Latin America is insufficiently understood.

OBJECTIVE

To identify genetic variants in genes related to triglyceride (TG) metabolism among adults with sHTG from Colombia.

METHODS

In individuals with plasma TG ≥ 880 mg/dL at least once in their lifetime, we amplified and sequenced all exons and intron/exon boundaries of the genes LPL, APOC2, APOA5, GPIHBP1 and LMF1. For each variant we ascertained its location, zygosity, allelic frequency and pathogenicity classification according to American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) criteria.

RESULTS

The study included 166 participants (62% male, mean age 50 years), peak TG levels ranged between 894 and 11,000 mg/dL. We identified 92 variants: 19 in LPL, 7 in APOC2, 11 in GPIHBP1, 38 in LMF1, and 17 in APOA5. Eighteen of these variants had not been reported. We identified a new pathogenic variant in LMF1 (c.41C>A; p.Ser14*), a new likely pathogenic variant in LMF1 (c.1527 C > T; p.Pro509=, also expressed as c.1447C>T; p.Gln483*), and a known pathogenic variant in LMF1 (c.779G>A; p.Trp260*). Four participants were heterozygous for variant c.953A>G; p.Asn318Ser in LPL, a known risk factor for hypertriglyceridemia. Participants with variants of unknown significance (VUS) in LMF1 had significantly higher peak TG than those with VUS in other genes. Peak TG were 4317 mg/dL in participants with a history of pancreatitis, and 1769 mg/dL in those without it (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study identified variants associated with sHTG among Latinos, and showed that genetic variation in LMF1 may be frequently associated with sHTG in this population.

Ethnic Diversity and Distinctive Features of Familial Versus Multifactorial Chylomicronemia Syndrome: Insights From the UK FCS National Registry

BACKGROUND

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder. This study aimed to study the genotype distribution of FCS-causing genes in the United Kingdom, genotype-phenotype correlation, and clinical differences between FCS and multifactorial chylomicronemia syndrome (MCS).

METHODS

The study included 154 patients (FCS, 74; MCS, 80) from the UK FCS national registry and the UK arm of the FCS International Quality Improvement and Service Evaluation Project.

RESULTS

FCS was relatively common in non-Europeans and those with parental consanguinity (P<0.001 for both). LPL variants were more common in European patients with FCS (European, 64%; non-European, 46%), while the genotype was more diverse in non-European patients with FCS. Patients with FCS had a higher incidence compared with patients with MCS of acute pancreatitis (84% versus 60%; P=0.001), recurrent pancreatitis (92% versus 63%; P<0.001), unexplained abdominal pain (84% versus 52%; P<0.001), earlier age of onset (median [interquartile range]) of symptoms (15.0 [5.5-26.5] versus 34.0 [25.2-41.7] years; P<0.001), and of acute pancreatitis (24.0 [10.7-31.0] versus 33.5 [26.0-42.5] years; P<0.001). Adverse cardiometabolic features and their co-occurrence was more common in individuals with MCS compared with those with FCS (P<0.001 for each). Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease was more prevalent in individuals with MCS than those with FCS (P=0.04). However, this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. The prevalence of pancreatic complications and cardiometabolic profile of variant-positive MCS was intermediate between FCS and variant-negative MCS.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of gene variant distribution varies based on the ethnic origin of patients with FCS. Patients with FCS are at a higher risk of pancreatic complications while the prevalence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is lower in FCS compared with MCS. Carriers of heterozygous pathogenic variants have an intermediate phenotype between FCS and variant-negative MCS.

Etiology and emerging treatments for familial chylomicronemia syndrome

INTRODUCTION

Familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) is a rare autosomal recessive condition. Effective treatment is important as patients are at risk for severe and potentially fatal acute pancreatitis. We review recent developments in pharmacologic treatment for FCS, namely biological inhibitors of apolipoprotein (apo) C-III and angiopoietin-like protein 3 (ANGPTL3).

AREAS COVERED

FCS follows a biallelic inheritance pattern in which an individual inherits two pathogenic loss-of-function alleles of one of the five causal genes - LPL (in 60-80% of patients), GPIHBP1, APOA5, APOC2, and LMF1 - leading to the absence of lipolytic activity. Patients present from childhood with severely elevated triglyceride (TG) levels >10 mmol/L. Most patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia do not have FCS. A strict low-fat diet is the current first-line treatment, and existing lipid-lowering therapies are minimally effective in FCS. Apo C-III inhibitors are emerging TG-lowering therapies shown to be efficacious and safe in clinical trials. ANGPTL3 inhibitors, another class of emerging TG-lowering therapies, have been found to require at least partial lipoprotein lipase activity to lower plasma TG in clinical trials. ANGPTL3 inhibitors reduce plasma TG in patients with multifactorial chylomicronemia but not in patients with FCS who completely lack lipoprotein lipase activity.

EXPERT OPINION

Apo C-III inhibitors currently in development are promising treatments for FCS.

Clinical impact of genetic testing for lipid disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Genetic testing is increasingly becoming a common consideration in the clinical approach of dyslipidemia patients. Advances in research in last decade and increased recognition of genetics in biological pathways modulating blood lipid levels created a gap between theoretical knowledge and its applicability in clinical practice. Therefore, it is very important to define the clinical justification of genetic testing in dyslipidemia patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical indications for genetic testing for most dyslipidemias are not precisely defined and there are no clearly established guideline recommendations. In patients with severe low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels, the genetic analysis can be used to guide diagnostic and therapeutic approach, while in severe hypertriglyceridemia (HTG), clinicians can rely on triglyceride level rather than a genotype along the treatment pathway. Genetic testing increases diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification, access and adherence to specialty therapies, and cost-effectiveness of cascade testing. A shared decision-making model between the provider and the patient is essential as patient values, preferences and clinical characteristics play a very strong role.

SUMMARY

Genetic testing for lipid disorders is currently underutilized in clinical practice. However, it should be selectively used, according to the type of dyslipidemia and when the benefits overcome costs.

Nutrition interventions for adults with dyslipidemia: A Clinical Perspective from the National Lipid Association

Lifestyle habits can have a profound impact on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk. The National Lipid Association previously published recommendations for lifestyle therapies to manage dyslipidemia. This Clinical Perspective provides an update with a focus on nutrition interventions for the three most common dyslipidemias in adults: 1) low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) elevation; 2) triglyceride (TG) elevation, including severe hypertriglyceridemia with chylomicronemia; and 3) combined dyslipidemia, with elevations in both LDL-C and TG levels. Lowering LDL-C and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are the primary objectives for reducing ASCVD risk. With severe TG elevation (≥500 mg/dL), the primary objective is to prevent pancreatitis and ASCVD risk reduction is secondary. Nutrition interventions that lower LDL-C levels include reducing cholesterol-raising fatty acids and dietary cholesterol, as well as increasing intakes of unsaturated fatty acids, plant proteins, viscous fibers, and reducing adiposity for patients with overweight or obesity. Selected dietary supplements may be employed as dietary adjuncts. Nutrition interventions for all patients with elevated TG levels include restricting intakes of alcohol, added sugars, and refined starches. Additional lifestyle factors that reduce TG levels are participating in daily physical activity and reducing adiposity in patients with overweight or obesity. For patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia, an individualized approach is essential. Nutrition interventions for addressing concurrent elevations in LDL-C and TG include a combination of the strategies described for lowering LDL-C and TG. A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to facilitate success in making and sustaining dietary changes and the assistance of a registered dietitian nutritionist is highly recommended.