Rapid clozapine titration in treatment-refractory bipolar disorder

Evaluation of major adverse events of clozapine based on accordance to an international titration guideline

Introduction

Clozapine is the only antipsychotic approved for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, but without appropriate monitoring, it can be associated with potentially fatal outcomes. An International Adult Clozapine Titration Guideline categorizes patients into normal or slow metabolizers. Categorization provides clozapine titration schedules and recommends regular c-reactive protein (CRP) and clozapine concentration monitoring to reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The impact of the guideline on clozapine ADRs has not been evaluated.

Methods

A retrospective chart review assessed clozapine titrations, laboratory monitoring, ADRs, and discontinuations for clozapine-naive adult inpatients at a single center from January 1, 2013, to June 1, 2022. Each patient's cumulative weekly clozapine dosage was compared with their guideline recommended dosage to create a percent accordance. Linear logistic regression evaluated the relationship between titration speed and the presence of an ADR, while descriptive statistics analyzed laboratory monitoring.

Results

Forty-three patients were included, with the majority being White males with schizophrenia. An inverse relationship existed between the last inpatient week clozapine dose percent accordance and the probability of an ADR. Nonobese patients were less likely than obese patients to experience an ADR (odds ratio = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.99). CRP and clozapine concentration monitoring was suboptimal.

Discussion

Based on our small retrospective review of primarily White males, more aggressive clozapine titrations did not increase ADRs. Future studies with more diverse samples are needed and should focus on specific ADRs, which may have increased occurrence with rapid titrations. Obese patients were at higher risk of ADRs, correlating with the guideline-recommended slower titrations for these patients.

Association between initial pattern of clozapine titration, concentration-to-dose ratio, and incidence of fever in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders in a Korean tertiary hospital

Safe and effective administration of clozapine requires careful monitoring for inflammatory reactions during the initial titration. The concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio must be taken into account, which may vary among ethnicities. In this retrospective study, 1408 Korean schizophrenia inpatients were examined for during the first 8 weeks of clozapine titration. The average doses of clozapine administered during weeks 1, 2, 4, and 8 were 77.37, 137.73, 193.20, and 212.83 mg/day, with significantly lower doses for females than males. The average C/D ratio was significantly higher in females (1.75 ± 1.04 and 1.11 ± 0.67 ng/mL per mg/day). Patients with higher C/D ratios were more likely to experience fever and were prescribed lower doses of clozapine starting from week 4. In total, 22.1 % of patients developed a fever at an average of 15.74 days after initiating clozapine. Patients who developed a fever were younger, used more antipsychotics at baseline, had a higher C/D ratio, and had a higher incidence of an elevated C-reactive protein level. A higher C/D ratio, use of a greater number of antipsychotics at baseline, and concomitant olanzapine use were risk factors for the development of inflammatory reactions. The incidence of pneumonia, agranulocytosis, and myocarditis within 8 weeks were 3.7 %, 0.3 %, and 0.1 %. In summary, the target dose of clozapine titration is lower for Korean schizophrenia patients, with a higher C/D ratio and more frequent fever compared to Western patients; however, myocarditis occurs rarely. Our findings may contribute to the titration methods for clozapine for the East Asian population.

Prevention of suicidal behavior with lithium treatment in patients with recurrent mood disorders

Suicidal behavior is more prevalent in bipolar disorders than in other psychiatric illnesses. In the last thirty years evidence has emerged to indicate that long-term treatment of bipolar disorder patients with lithium may reduce risk of suicide and attempts, with possibly similar benefits in recurrent major depressive disorder. We review and update selected research literature on effects of lithium treatment in reducing suicidal behavior and consider proposals that higher levels of lithium in drinking water may be associated with lower suicide rates. We summarize results of a growing number of randomized, controlled studies of lithium treatment for suicide prevention including comparisons with placebos or alternative treatments, and comment on the severe challenges of such trials. The basis of a proposed protective effect of lithium against suicidal behaviors remains uncertain but may include protective effects against recurrences of depressive phases of mood disorders, especially with mixed features or agitation, and possibly through beneficial effects on impulsivity, agitation and dysphoric mood.

Challenges in defining treatment-resistant mania in adults: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review the definitions of treatment-resistant mania (TRM) in the literature and propose criteria for an operationalized definition.

METHODS

A systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Cochrane Central, and CINAHL) and data extraction of eligible articles.

RESULTS

In total, 47 articles addressing the concept of TRM were included, comprising 16 case reports, 11 case series, 3 randomized clinical trials, 8 open-label clinical trials, 1 experimental study, 7 narrative reviews, and 1 systematic review. While reviews discussed several challenges in defining TRM, definitions varied substantially based on different criteria for severity of mania, duration of mania, and use of specific therapeutic agents with minimal dosages and duration of treatment. Only a handful of the reviewed articles operationalized these criteria.

CONCLUSION

While the concept of TRM has been discussed in the literature for over three decades, we could not find an agreed-upon operationalized definition based on specific criteria. We propose and discuss a possible definition that could be used by clinicians to guide their practice and by researchers to assess the prevalence of TRM and develop and test interventions targeting TRM.

Rethinking Clozapine: Lights and Shadows of a Revolutionary Drug

The current literature globally highlights the efficacy of Clozapine in several psychiatric disorders all over the world, with an FDA indication for reducing the risk of repeated suicidal behavior in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. A growing field of research is also stressing a possible broader beneficial effect of Clozapine in promoting neuroprotection and neurotrophism. However, this drug is linked to several life-threatening side effects, such as agranulocytosis, myocarditis and seizures, that limit its use in daily clinical practice. For this work, a search was performed on PubMed using the terms "Clozapine indications", "Clozapine adverse effects", "Clozapine regenerative effects", and "Clozapine neuroplasticity" with the aim of reviewing the scientific literature on Clozapine's treatment indications, adverse effects and potential regenerative role. The results confirmed the efficacy of clozapine in clinical practice, although limited by its adverse effects. It appears crucial to raise awareness among clinicians about the potential benefits of using Clozapine, as well educating medical personnel about its risks and the early identification of possible adverse effects and their management.

How to save a life: From neurobiological underpinnings to psychopharmacotherapies in the prevention of suicide

The impact of suicide on our societies, mental healthcare, and public health is beyond questionable. Every year approximately 700 000 lives are lost due to suicide around the world (WHO, 2021); more people die by suicide than by homicide and war. Although suicide is a key issue and reducing suicide mortality is a global imperative, suicide is a highly complex biopsychosocial phenomenon, and in spite of several suicidal models developed in recent years and a high number of suicide risk factors identified, we still have neither a sufficient understanding of underpinnings of suicide nor adequate management strategies to reduce its prevalence. The present paper first overviews the background of suicidal behavior including its epidemiology, prevalence, age and gender correlations and its association with neuropsychiatric disorders as well as its clinical assessment. Then we give an overview of the etiological background, including its biopsychosocial contexts, genetics and neurobiology. Based on the above, we then provide a critical overview of the currently available intervention options to manage and reduce risk of suicide, including psychotherapeutic modalities, traditional medication classes also providing an up-to-date overview on the antisuicidal effects of lithium, as well as novel molecules such as esketamine and emerging medications and further molecules in development. Finally we give a critical overview on our current knowledge on using neuromodulatory and biological therapies, such as ECT, rTMS, tDCS and other options.

Drug-drug interactions involving combinations of antipsychotic agents with antidiabetic, lipid-lowering, and weight loss drugs

INTRODUCTION

Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) have a high risk for diabetes, dyslipidemia, and other components of metabolic syndrome. Patients with these metabolic comorbidities and cardiac risk factors should receive not only antipsychotics but also medications aiming to reduce cardiovascular risk. Therefore, many patients may be exposed to clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review summarizes data regarding the known or potential drug-drug interactions between antipsychotics and medications treating metabolic syndrome components, except for hypertension, which has been summarized elsewhere. A literature search in PubMed and Scopus up to 7/31/2021 was performed regarding interactions between antipsychotics and drugs used to treat metabolic syndrome components, aiming to inform clinicians' choice of medication for patients with SMI and cardiometabolic risk factors in need of pharmacologic interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

The cytochrome P450 system and, to a lesser extent, the P-glycoprotein transporter is involved in the pharmacokinetic interactions between antipsychotics and some statins or saxagliptin. Regarding pharmacodynamic interactions, the available information is based mostly on small studies, and for newer classes, like PCSK9 inhibitors or SGLT2 inhibitors, data are still lacking. However, there is sufficient information to guide clinicians in the process of selecting safer antipsychotic-cardiometabolic risk reduction drug combinations.

An international guideline with six personalised titration schedules for preventing myocarditis and pneumonia associated with clozapine

White blood cell (WBC) monitoring has reduced clozapine-treated patient deaths associated with agranulocytosis to a rarity. However, clozapine protocols and package inserts worldwide provide no instructions for preventing myocarditis or pneumonia during clozapine titrations. Prescribers worldwide are largely unaware of that. Meanwhile, as they worry about agranulocytosis, their clozapine-treated patients are at risk of dying from pneumonia or myocarditis. Consequently, an international guideline with 104 authors from 50 countries/regions was recently published to provide personalised clozapine titration schedules for adult inpatients. This forum article reviews pneumonia and myocarditis occurring during clozapine titration, as well as the three most innovative aspects of this new guideline: (1) personalised titration, (2) C reactive protein (CRP) measures, and (3) dose predictions based on blood levels. Clozapine metabolism is influenced by 3 levels of complexity: (1) ancestry groups, (2) sex-smoking subgroups, and (3) presence/absence of poor metabolizer status. These 3 groups of variables should determine the maintenance dose and speed of clozapine titration; they are summarised in a table in the full-text. The international clozapine titration guideline recommends measuring CRP levels simultaneously with WBC, at baseline and weekly at least for the first 4 weeks of titration, the highest risk period for clozapine-induced myocarditis.

Clozapine and Neutropenia in Patients with Schizophrenia and SARS-CoV-2 Infection

BACKGROUND

Clozapine (CLZ) is used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Adverse reactions to clozapine include neutropenia. In March 2020, WHO declared the COVID-19 pandemic and after, psychiatrists raised concerns regarding continuation of clozapine, due to multiple restrictions. We aimed to provide a study on the association between neutropenia and clozapine in patients with schizophrenia and COVID-19.

AIM

To assess the neutrophil count in patients with schizophrenia treated with clozapine and infected with COVID-19.

METHODS

The study patients with schizophrenia, according to DSM-5, admitted to the Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry and Neurology Brasov, Romania, between April 2020 and October 2021. The inclusion criteria included positive RT-PCR (real-time PCR) test for COVID-19 and treatment with clozapine. We assessed three values of ANC (absolute neutrophil count): before COVID-19 infection (last ANC obtained at mandatory check), during infection and 1 month after resolution (first negative PCR test).

RESULTS

Of the 105 cases, 95 did not have neutropenia. Fifty-nine patients were males (62.1%), mean age was 43.5 years (SD = 12.1) with an average of clozapine treatment of 52.4 months (SD = 11.9). At baseline, they had a small reduction in the ANC mean value (4.41 × 109/l; SD = 2.22) which did not constitute a statistically significant decline from the prior to COVID-19 mean value of 4.66 × 109/l (SD = 2.34; p = 0.45). Values were also normal in the first month after negative PCR testing (4.45 × 109/l; SD = 2.35; p = 0.91). A total of 10 patients (9.5%) had neutropenia. The age, dose of clozapine and duration of treatment were not statistically different compared to the group without neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatrists and other health professionals should keep in mind that neutrophil count may decrease during COVID-19 infection in patients taking clozapine and in some cases, neutropenia may even occur. We assumed that neutropenia could be caused by COVID-19 and clozapine interaction.

An International Adult Guideline for Making Clozapine Titration Safer by Using Six Ancestry-Based Personalized Dosing Titrations, CRP, and Clozapine Levels

This international guideline proposes improving clozapine package inserts worldwide by using ancestry-based dosing and titration. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) databases suggest that clozapine is the third most toxic drug in the United States (US), and it produces four times higher worldwide pneumonia mortality than that by agranulocytosis or myocarditis. For trough steady-state clozapine serum concentrations, the therapeutic reference range is narrow, from 350 to 600 ng/mL with the potential for toxicity and ADRs as concentrations increase. Clozapine is mainly metabolized by CYP1A2 (female non-smokers, the lowest dose; male smokers, the highest dose). Poor metabolizer status through phenotypic conversion is associated with co-prescription of inhibitors (including oral contraceptives and valproate), obesity, or inflammation with C-reactive protein (CRP) elevations. The Asian population (Pakistan to Japan) or the Americas' original inhabitants have lower CYP1A2 activity and require lower clozapine doses to reach concentrations of 350 ng/mL. In the US, daily doses of 300-600 mg/day are recommended. Slow personalized titration may prevent early ADRs (including syncope, myocarditis, and pneumonia). This guideline defines six personalized titration schedules for inpatients: 1) ancestry from Asia or the original people from the Americas with lower metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing minimum therapeutic dosages of 75-150 mg/day, 2) ancestry from Asia or the original people from the Americas with average metabolism needing 175-300 mg/day, 3) European/Western Asian ancestry with lower metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing 100-200 mg/day, 4) European/Western Asian ancestry with average metabolism needing 250-400 mg/day, 5) in the US with ancestries other than from Asia or the original people from the Americas with lower clozapine metabolism (obesity or valproate) needing 150-300 mg/day, and 6) in the US with ancestries other than from Asia or the original people from the Americas with average clozapine metabolism needing 300-600 mg/day. Baseline and weekly CRP monitoring for at least four weeks is required to identify any inflammation, including inflammation secondary to clozapine rapid titration.

Clozapine in patients with schizoaffective disorder: A systematic review

Schizoaffective disorder is defined by the appearance of positive psychotic symptomatology as well as affective features, even when it is considered a controversial nosologic entity, proving difficult to accord on its definition or diagnostic criteria. Due to these conceptual differences, it has been a challenge to study effective therapeutic measures and, consequently, the availability of data in the current literature, resulting in the extrapolation of clinical guidelines and recommendations initially established for patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The current study aimed to systematically search and summarize the published evidence to date about the use of clozapine in patients with schizoaffective disorder. Seven studies were identified, that are heterogeneous on their designs and methodology, including samples of patients mixed with bipolar or schizophrenic disorders. The evidence was summarized both in a table and a narrative fashion, suggesting that clozapine may be an effective treatment for both psychotic and affective symptoms, indistinctively of an acute or maintenance phase.

Low-dose clozapine-related seizure: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Treatment-resistant schizophrenia is a severe form of schizophrenia characterized by poor response to at least two antipsychotic drugs and is typically treated with clozapine. However, clozapine lowers the epileptic threshold, leading to seizures, which are severe side effects of antipsychotics that result in multiple complications. Clozapine-related seizures are generally considered to be dose-dependent and especially rare in the low-dose (150-300 mg/d) clozapine treated population. Due to clinical rarity, little is known about its clinical characteristics and treatment.

CASE SUMMARY

A 62-year-old Chinese man with a 40-year history of treatment-resistant schizophrenia presented to the Emergency Department with symptoms of myoclonus, consciousness disturbance and vomiting after taking 125 mg clozapine. Upon admission, the patient had a suddenly generalized tonic-clonic seizure lasting for about half a minute with persistent disturbance of consciousness, fever, cough and bloody sputum, which was considered to be low-dose clozapine-related seizure. After antiepileptic and multiple anti-infection treatments, the patient was discharged without epileptic or psychotic symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Our aim is to highlight the early prevention and optimal treatment of clozapine-related seizure through case analysis and literature review.

Clinical Utility and Safety of Slower-than-Recommended Titration of Clozapine for Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenia: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Slow titration of clozapine is recommended given the risk of serious adverse effects. However, the utility and safety of slower-than-recommended titration of clozapine remain unclear. Consequently, we aimed to investigate the clinical utility and safety of slower-than-recommended titration of clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 152 inpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who had been newly started on clozapine in a tertiary psychiatric public hospital between April 2012 and March 2018. The primary outcome was clozapine continuation for the first 18 weeks. We performed multivariate logistic regression to identify the association between the rate of clozapine dose titration and clozapine continuation for the first 18 weeks. Among the 152 inpatients, 122 (80%) could continue clozapine for the first 18 weeks. There was no significant association between the rate of clozapine dose titration and clozapine continuation for the first 18 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 1.23; 95% CI 0.29-5.26; p = 0.78). Our findings indicate that slower-than-recommended titration of clozapine may not improve toward clozapine continuation for the first 18 weeks. Therefore, it may not be a beneficial option in terms of safe clozapine continuation when starting clozapine for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Clozapine for Treatment-Refractory Aggressive Behavior

Emergency psychiatry has the main role of resolving suicidal behavior and aggression. These severe psychiatric symptoms can be found in many psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression, personality disorders, cognitive disorders, intellectual disability and substance abuse. Although indications for the use of antipsychotics are limited to a specific group of diseases, they are frequently used as rescue medication in high-risk or nonresponsive cases. Clozapine, the gold standard for TRS (treatment resistant schizophrenia) is effective in controlling aggression. The aim of the research was to identify the use of clozapine for treatment-refractory aggressive behavior in psychiatric emergency. A retrospective study based on the paper files of patients admitted between 2010 and 2019 in the Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry and Neurology of Brasov, Romania. Were included all the patients admitted as a psychiatric emergency and treated with clozapine for aggressive behavior. The hospital is an academic institution with 150 beds for acute patients, serving an area of over 600,000 inhabitants. It is the main public institution where patients with psychiatric emergencies are hospitalized. Off 19,000 patients admitted during the study period, 504 patients (2,4%) with a diagnosis other than schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder received clozapine for aggressiveness (89.5%). The first four diagnoses identified were bipolar disorder (n = 172), intellectual disability (n = 128), cognitive impairment (n = 112), and personality disorder (n = 92). Other disorders identified but with a smaller number of cases were major depressive disorder (n = 3), adjustment disorders (n = 2), delusional disorder (n = 2), obsessive compulsive disorder (n = 2) and postpartum psychosis (n = 1). Clozapine was used as 3rd or 4th choice. The dose was greater for manic patients (350.29 ± 98.01 mg/day) compared with all the other diagnoses. Clozapine was effective and safe in cases of patients with treatment-refractory aggressive behavior.

Rapid Titration of Clozapine in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder

Despite evidence accumulated over 30 years of clozapine efficacy in schizophrenia, its use is suboptimal. Long duration of standard titration and monitoring procedures are strong barriers in clozapine prescribing. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the challenges of rapid clozapine titration. The currently approved/recommended titration methods in US, Europe, and Australia are discussed. The rapid clozapine titration was introduced in our hospital in the early 2000's as "last resort" method for aggressive, belligerent or homicidal patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. In our opinion, rapid clozapine titration might shorten the duration of patient and family suffering associated with uncontrolled psychotic symptoms, reduce the need and risks associated with polypharmacy, and reduce the costs of health care services of prolonged hospitalization. As there are no randomized controlled clinical trials to compare the efficacy and safety of standard versus rapid titration of clozapine in schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, future studies are needed.

The concept and management of acute episodes of treatment-resistant bipolar disorder: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The definitions of treatment-resistant bipolar disorder (TRBD) have varied across studies. Additionally, its management is clinically challenging. An updated synthesis and appraisal of the available evidence is needed.

METHODS

A systematic search of major electronic databases from inception up to May 25th, 2020, was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for the management of TRBD. When sufficient evidence was available, a meta-analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies (n = 928 patients) were included in the qualitative synthesis. Fourteen studies (n = 803) assessed treatment-resistant acute bipolar depression (TRBD-De), including five neuromodulatory and nine pharmacological trials. Rapid- vs. standard up-titration of clozapine showed promising efficacy for TRBD mania, without significant adverse events. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) was confirmed to be similarly effective for TRBD-De as for treatment-resistant unipolar depression: odd ratio, OR = 0.919 (95%C.I. = 0.44-1.917), I² = 13.98, p = .822. TRBD-De patients exposed to ketamine at day one post-infusion had high odds of response: OR = 10.682 (95%C.I. = 2.142-53.272), I² = 0, p = <.005. The pooled drop-out rate in the ketamine trials was 21.2%. Additional evidence is warranted to confirm the potential efficacy of pramipexole or stimulants for TRBD-De.

LIMITATIONS

Publication/measurement bias; exploratory nature of the meta-analyses for interventions that included participants solely with TRBD-De.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, a few interventions are available for TRBD, including pramipexole, ECT, and clozapine, among others. Larger and better-designed trials for TRBD are warranted and should be based on more uniform operational definitions. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018114567.

Clozapine in patients with schizoaffective disorder: A systematic review

Schizoaffective disorder is defined by the appearance of positive psychotic symptomatology as well as affective features, even when it is considered a controversial nosologic entity, proving difficult to accord on its definition or diagnostic criteria. Due to these conceptual differences, it has been a challenge to study effective therapeutic measures and, consequently, the availability of data in the current literature, resulting in the extrapolation of clinical guidelines and recommendations initially established for patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. The current study aimed to systematically search and summarize the published evidence to date about the use of clozapine in patients with schizoaffective disorder. Seven studies were identified, that are heterogeneous on their designs and methodology, including samples of patients mixed with bipolar or schizophrenic disorders. The evidence was summarized both in a table and a narrative fashion, suggesting that clozapine may be an effective treatment for both psychotic and affective symptoms, indistinctively of an acute or maintenance phase.

Antipsychotics in Postpartum Psychosis

BACKGROUND

Psychotic episodes in the postpartum period are life-threatening psychiatric emergencies, requiring urgent medical attention and admission to a psychiatric hospital.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

Although the postpartum psychosis (PPP) is the most severe psychiatric disorder associated with parturition, there is little information about what interventions are most effective. Because there are no specific guidelines for the treatment of PPP, the aim of the present review was to examine the available evidence regarding the treatment of PPP.

DATA SOURCES

The PubMed database was searched based on the title and the abstract, using the key words "postpartum psychosis," "postpartum psychosis antipsychotics," "postpartum psychosis treatment," and "postpartum psychosis pharmacotherapy," for both interventional and observational, irrespective of language.

RESULTS

A number of 14 publications met the study criteria, including case reports and case series. The antipsychotics (APs) use included both first generation APs, such as haloperidol and chlorpromazine, and second generation APs, mainly, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone. The most frequently used AP was olanzapine. Olanzapine and quetiapine seem to be the most acceptable during breastfeeding. Proposed treatment algorithms for the successful management of PPP are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing studies to date do not allow to draw a definitive conclusion regarding which treatment is the most effective or the most adequate. Existing evidence suggests that APs alone or in combination are responsible for sustained remission and that treated PPP has a higher pace of improvement of the mental status, with a rapid discharge from the hospital. Clinical studies to compare the efficacy and safety of different APs in the PPP are needed to provide guidance on treatment interventions.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of rates of clozapine-associated myocarditis and cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Clozapine is the most effective medication for treatment refractory schizophrenia, but is associated with cardiac adverse drug reactions. Myocarditis and cardiomyopathy are the most serious cardiac adverse drug reactions although reported rates of these conditions vary in the literature. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed the event rates, the absolute death rates and case fatality rates of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy associated with clozapine.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for studies that reported on the incidence of cardiomyopathy or myocarditis in people exposed to clozapine. Data were meta-analysed using a random effects model, with subgroup analysis on study size, time frame, region, quality, retrospective vs prospective, and diagnostic criteria of myocarditis or cardiomyopathy.

RESULTS

28 studies of 258,961 people exposed to clozapine were included. The event rate of myocarditis was 0.007 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.003, 0.016]), absolute death rate was 0.0004 (95% CI = [0.0002, 0.0009]) and case fatality rate was 0.127 (95% CI = [0.034, 0.377]). The cardiomyopathy event rate was 0.006 (95% CI = [0.002, 0.023]), absolute death rate was 0.0003 (95% CI = [0.0001, 0.0012]) and case fatality rate was 0.078 (95% CI = [0.018, 0.285]). Few included studies provided information on criteria for diagnosis of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Event rates of cardiomyopathy and myocarditis were higher in Australia.

CONCLUSION

Clarity of diagnostic criteria for myocarditis remains a challenge. Observation bias may, in part, influence higher reported rates in Australia. Monitoring for myocarditis is warranted in the first 4 weeks, and treatment of comorbid metabolic syndrome and diabetes may reduce the risk of cardiomyopathy. The risks of myocarditis and cardiomyopathy are low and should not present a barrier to people with treatment refractory schizophrenia being offered a monitored trial of clozapine.

A systematic review of sex-based differences in effectiveness and adverse effects of clozapine

Clozapine is one of the most widely used antipsychotics for treating psychiatric illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. This drug, however, is associated with adverse effects such as weight gain, metabolic syndrome, and blood dyscrasias. The manifestations of mental illness may differ between men and women. Yet, there is little evidence on the influence of sex on treatment response or the occurrence of AEs. To fill this gap of knowledge, we carried out a systematic review of the literature on sex differences in the effectiveness and adverse effects of clozapine. Scant evidence has been published on differences in effectiveness of clozapine between men and women. Indeed, to the best of our knowledge, this issue has only been addressed in a published study. Regarding adverse effects, males have been reported to be more likely to develop metabolic abnormalities such as cholesterol or triglycerides, hypertension, and cardiovascular risk, while females are at a higher risk for gaining weight, developing diabetes, and needing laxatives. Nevertheless, given the scarcity of sex-based studies on this drug, further studies are needed to explore sex-based differences, as the results obtained may be crucial to clinical practice and help improve the quality of life of patients.

Clozapine rapid retitration in the community: an assertive approach can prevent admissions

Rapid retitration of clozapine may be necessary to reduce the known high risk of mental state destabilisation in patients who have had a 48 h treatment break. It may carry a high risk of complications, including seizures and myocarditis. We reflect on the literature on standard and rapid retitration and present a case of rapid retitration in the community. In this case, of a 54-year-old homeless man with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and polysubstance misuse, we safely retitrated clozapine in a community setting four times during a 6-month period; each retitration was completed over 4 days. We used a specific protocol based on his psychiatric history. We are now more confident in delivering clozapine retitration to other patients, thus preventing unnecessary admissions.

DECLARATION OF INTEREST

N. N. has received honoraria from Janssen Pharmaceuticals.

Clozapine for Treatment-Refractory Behavioral Disturbance in Dementia

BACKGROUND

Behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia significantly contribute to caregiver burden and impose patient hospitalization. The goal of treatment of admitted patients is the rapid remission of symptoms to allow their return to home as soon as possible. Intervention requires an intrusive approach with parenteral treatment and physical restraints, with a negative emotional impact on patients and their families. Despite the large utilization of antipsychotics for behavioral and psychological symptoms, there is no antipsychotic approved by the Food and Drug Administration for agitation in dementia.

STUDY QUESTION

To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of clozapine in patients with treatment-resistant agitation associated with dementia.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study with 337 patients, admitted between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016, with dementia according to The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th ed. criteria. Clozapine was given in standard titration, starting with 6.25 or 12.5 mg.

MEASURES AND OUTCOMES

Efficacy was measured by the need for physical restraints and time to discharge and tolerability by recording all side effects. Data collected included demographics, psychotropics used, physical restraints, length of stay, destination after discharge, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 337 cases, 315 (93.5%) patients received antipsychotics. There were 27 cases treated with clozapine. Before clozapine initiation, haloperidol was given in 16 cases (55.17%, mean = 7.43 mg/d, SD = ±4.01), and the treatment was stopped mainly because of extrapyramidal side effects. Other antipsychotics used were quetiapine (mean dose = 260 mg/d, SD = ±54.77), risperidone (mean dose = 3.3 mg/d, SD = ±0.57), and olanzapine (mean dose = 8.33 mg/d, SD = ±2.88). Mean dose of clozapine was 59.16 mg/d, (SD = ±40.48), ranging from 12.5 to 200 mg/d. There were a lower number of physical restraints after clozapine initiation than before (12 vs. 34, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clozapine therapy seemed beneficial in treatment-resistant agitation in patients with dementia. The risk-benefit balance must be well weighed when clozapine is chosen. More studies are needed.

Switching bipolar disorder patients treated with clozapine to another antipsychotic medication: a mirror image study

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with periodic symptom exacerbations, leading to functional impairment, and increased risk of suicide. Although clozapine has never been approved for the treatment of BD, it is occasionally used in severe mania. The aim of the study is to evaluate the risks and benefits of switching clozapine in remitted BD patients. This is an observational, mirror image study of 62 consecutive remitted BD outpatients treated with clozapine. Twenty-five patients were switched to another antipsychotic following a change in a drug reimbursement rule, while 37 continued on clozapine. The mean time in remission was shorter for the switched group (9.2±4 months vs 13±6 months, P=0.018), and the number of patients who relapsed was larger (n=21 vs n=8, P<0.0001). The results suggest that switching from clozapine to another antipsychotic may increase the risk of relapses in remitted patients with BD.

Clozapine for Drug-Refractory Irritability in Individuals with Developmental Disability

OBJECTIVES

In this case series, we describe the acute clinical impact and tolerability of rapid titration of clozapine for treatment of refractory irritability in five hospitalized youth with developmental disability. We offer this descriptive report in an effort to expand the evidence base guiding treatment of refractory aggression in this population.

METHODS

Five youth with developmental disability and severe irritability were admitted to a 10-bed psychiatric crisis stabilization unit where they received thorough psychiatric and medical evaluation. Informed consent was obtained in each case, and each patient underwent rapid titration onto clozapine. Clozapine monitoring guidelines were followed for all patients throughout treatment, and clinical severity at baseline and improvement with treatment was measured by use of the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (CGI-S) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale (CGI-I).

RESULTS

One female and four males diagnosed with developmental disability and at least one other psychiatric diagnosis, mean age of 13.1 ± 2.1 years, and mean CGI-S at baseline of 5.8, each received clozapine treatment by rapid titration. The mean therapeutic total daily dose of clozapine was 380 ± 200 mg. All patients demonstrated acute clinical improvement with the mean final CGI-I of 2.0, or "much improved."

CONCLUSION

These initial results support the potential utility of clozapine rapid titration for treatment of severe refractory irritability in youth with developmental disability. These patients tolerated clozapine treatment in the short term. Future studies are needed to thoroughly evaluate the long-term safety of clozapine treatment in this population.

Refractory bipolar disorder and neuroprogression

Immune activation and failure of physiologic compensatory mechanisms over time have been implicated in the pathophysiology of illness progression in bipolar disorder. Recent evidence suggests that such changes are important contributors to neuroprogression and may mediate the cross-sensitization of episode recurrence, trauma exposure and substance use. The present review aims to discuss the potential factors related to bipolar disorder refractoriness and neuroprogression. In addition, we will discuss the possible impacts of early therapeutic interventions as well as the alternative approaches in late stages of the disorder.

Suicidal Behavior in Mood Disorders: Response to Pharmacological Treatment

Suicidal behavior is strongly associated with depression, especially if accompanied by behavioral activation, dysphoria, or agitation. It may respond to some treatments, but the design of scientifically sound, ethical trials to test for therapeutic effects on suicidal behavior is highly challenging. In bipolar disorder, and possibly also unipolar major depression, an underprescribed medical intervention with substantial evidence of preventive effects on suicidal behavior is long-term treatment with lithium. It is unclear whether this effect is specifically antisuicidal or reflects beneficial effects of lithium on depression, mood instability, and perhaps aggression and impulsivity. Antisuicidal effects of anticonvulsant mood stabilizers (carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate) appear to be less than with lithium. Further evaluation is needed for potential antisuicidal effects of atypical antipsychotics with growing evidence of efficacy in depression, particularly acute bipolar depression, while generally lacking risk of inducing agitation, mania, or mood instability. Short-term and long-term value and safety of antidepressants are relatively secure for unipolar depression but uncertain and poorly tested for bipolar depression; their effects on suicidal risk in unipolar depression may be age-dependent. Sedative anxiolytics are virtually unstudied as regards suicidal risks. Adequate management of suicidal risks in mood disorder patients requires comprehensive, clinically skillful monitoring and timely interventions.

Clozapine Can Be the Good Option in Resistant Mania

Bipolar mood disorder is a mental disorder with a lifetime prevalence rate of about 1% in the general population and there are still a proportion of individuals who suffer from bipolar mood disorders that are resistant to standard treatment. Reporting clozapine responsive mania that was not responding to two previous consecutive atypical antipsychotics and one typical antipsychotic was aimed at. A 17-year-old male manic patient was admitted into the psychiatry inpatient department and was nonresponsive to Risperidone 12 mg daily for 4 weeks, Olanzapine 30 mg daily for 3 weeks, and Haloperidol 30 mg daily for 3 weeks, along with valproate preparation 1500 mg daily. He was started on clozapine as he was nonresponsive to Lithium in previous episodes and did not consent to starting Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT). He responded adequately to 100 mg clozapine and 1500 mg valproate preparation and remission happened within 2 weeks of starting clozapine. Clozapine can be a good option for resistant mania and further RCT based evidences will strengthen the options in treating resistant mania.

Rapid Clozapine Titration in Patients with Treatment Refractory Schizophrenia

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of rapid clozapine titration in patients with schizophrenia in hospital settings. We conducted a retrospective two-center cohort study to compare the safety and effectiveness of clozapine with different titration rates in treatment-refractory patients with schizophrenia. In the first center, clozapine was started at 25-50 mg followed by 50-100 mg as needed every 6 h on day 1, followed by increases of 50-100 mg/day. In the second center, titration was slower; clozapine initiated with 12.5-50 mg on day 1 followed by increases of 25-50 mg/day. The number of days between starting of clozapine until discharge was shorter in the rapid titration group (22.4 ± 8.72 vs 27.0 ± 10.5, p = 0.1). Number of days of total hospital stay were significantly shorter in the rapid titration group (29.6 ± 10.6 vs 41.2 ± 14.8, p = 0.002). Hypotension was more common in the rapid titration group and one patient had suspected myocarditis. Rapid clozapine titration appeared safe and effective. The length of stay following initiation of clozapine was shorter in the rapid-titration group, although this was not statistically significant. However starting clozapine earlier together with rapid titration has significantly shortened the length of hospital stay in patients with treatment refractory schizophrenia.

Risks and Benefits of Rapid Clozapine Titration

Clozapine is often considered the gold standard for the treatment of schizophrenia. Clinical guidelines suggest a gradual titration over 2 weeks to reduce the risks of adverse events such as seizures, hypotension, agranulocytosis, and myocarditis. The slow titration often delays time to therapeutic response. This raises the question of whether, in some patients, it may be safe to use a more rapid clozapine titration. The following case illustrates the potential risks associated with the use of multiple antipsychotics and rapid clozapine titration. We present the case of a young man with schizophrenia who developed life threatening neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS) during rapid clozapine titration and treatment with multiple antipsychotics. We were unable to find another case in the literature of NMS associated with rapid clozapine titration. This case is meant to urge clinicians to carefully evaluate the risks and benefits of rapid clozapine titration, and to encourage researchers to further evaluate the safety of rapid clozapine titration. Rapid clozapine titration has implications for decreasing health care costs associated with prolonged hospitalizations, and decreasing the emotional suffering associated with uncontrolled symptoms of psychosis. Clozapine is considered the most effective antipsychotic available thus efforts should focus on developing strategies that would allow for safest and most efficient use of clozapine to encourage its utilization for treatment resistance schizophrenia.

Worldwide Differences in Regulations of Clozapine Use

Clozapine remains the drug of choice for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. As a consequence of its long history and complex pharmacology, we suspected wide variation in the regulations of clozapine use across different countries. The summaries of product characteristics (SPCs) from clozapine manufacturers, as well as local and national guidelines in the following selected countries, were reviewed: China, Denmark, Ireland, Japan, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Romania, the UK and the US. Clozapine is available as tablets in all countries, as an oral suspension in all included countries, with the exception of Japan and Romania, as orally disintegrating tablets in the US and China, and as an injectable in The Netherlands. General practitioner prescribing is only available in The Netherlands, New Zealand, the UK and the US, although with some restrictions in some of the countries. In Ireland and China, clozapine is only dispensed through hospital pharmacies. Hematological monitoring is mandatory in all countries but varies substantially in frequency, e.g. in Denmark hematologic monitoring is mandatory weekly for 18 weeks, followed by monthly monitoring, compared with Japan where blood work is required weekly for 26 weeks, followed by biweekly hematologic monitoring thereafter. In most included countries, with the exception of Denmark, Romania and The Netherlands, the manufacturer provides a mandatory hematological monitoring database, and dispensing of clozapine is not permissible without acceptable white blood count and absolute neutrophil count results. Local guidelines in New Zealand recommend echocardiography and routine troponin during the initial phases of treatment with clozapine. Regulations of clozapine vary widely with regard to rules of prescribing and monitoring. A worldwide update and harmonization of these regulations is recommended.

Aggression in autism spectrum disorder: presentation and treatment options

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent difficulties in social communication and social interaction, coupled with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior or interest. Research indicates that aggression rates may be higher in individuals with ASD compared to those with other developmental disabilities. Aggression is associated with negative outcomes for children with ASD and their caregivers, including decreased quality of life, increased stress levels, and reduced availability of educational and social support. Therapeutic strategies including functional behavioral assessment, reinforcement strategies, and functional communication training may have a significant impact in reducing the frequency and intensity of aggressive behavior in individuals with ASD. Pharmacologic treatments, particularly the use of second-generation antipsychotics, may also be of some benefit in reducing aggression in individuals with ASD. With the ever-increasing rate of ASD diagnosis, development of effective therapeutic and pharmacologic methods for preventing and treating aggression are essential to improving outcomes in this disorder.

Effectiveness of ultra-rapid dose titration of clozapine for treatment-resistant bipolar mania: case series

Treatment of severe and refractory manic episodes in hospital settings can occasionally be very difficult. In particular, severely excited patients showing aggressive, hostile, impulsive behaviours frequently require physical restraint and seclusion, high doses of antipsychotics and benzodiazepines, and sometimes, electroconvulsive therapy. Hospital stay is generally prolonged and such patients cause great emotional distress for other patients in the ward and clinical staff involved in their care. Here we report on three patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and one patient with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder bipolar subtype, all of whom were hospitalized for severe manic episodes with psychotic features. These patients were extremely difficult to manage in the ward as no response could be obtained in the first week of treatment despite high doses of antipsychotics and benzodiazepine administration. The introduction and rapid titration of clozapine proved remarkably effective and was well tolerated in the acute management of these patients. We observed that clozapine had a superior and fast mood stabilization effect with rapid titration and could be extremely helpful in the management of such patients.

Seizure associated with clozapine: incidence, etiology, and management

Seizures are a known adverse effect of clozapine therapy. The literature varies on incidence rates of seizures, secondary to varying time frames in which each seizure occurred. Tonic-clonic seizures comprise the majority of seizures experienced secondary to clozapine use, but it is imperative to recognize the potential variety of seizure presentation. The exact etiology of clozapine-induced seizure is unknown. Conflicting reports regarding total oral dose, serum concentration, dose titration, and concomitant medications make it difficult to identify a single cause contributing to seizure risk. Following seizure occurrence, it may be in the best interests of the patient to continue clozapine treatment. In this clinical situation, the use of an antiepileptic drug (AED) for seizure prophylaxis may be required. The AED of choice appears to be valproate, but several successful case reports also support the use of lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate. Well-designed clinical trials regarding clozapine seizure prophylaxis are lacking. Given clozapine's strong evidence for efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, every attempt to manage side effects, including seizure, should be implemented to allow for therapeutic continuation.