rTMS effects in patients with co-morbid somatic pain and depressive mood disorders

Consensus review and considerations on TMS to treat depression: A comprehensive update endorsed by the National Network of Depression Centers, the Clinical TMS Society, and the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

This article updates the prior 2018 consensus statement by the National Network of Depression Centers (NNDC) on the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in the treatment of depression, incorporating recent research and clinical developments. Publications on TMS and depression between September 2016 and April 2024 were identified using methods informed by PRISMA guidelines. The NNDC Neuromodulation Work Group met monthly between October 2022 and April 2024 to define important clinical topics and review pertinent literature. A modified Delphi method was used to achieve consensus. 2,396 abstracts and manuscripts met inclusion criteria for review. The work group generated consensus statements which include an updated narrative review of TMS safety, efficacy, and clinical features of use for depression. Considerations related to training, roles/responsibilities of providers, and documentation are also discussed. TMS continues to demonstrate broad evidence for safety and efficacy in treating depression. Newer forms of TMS are faster and potentially more effective than conventional repetitive TMS. Further exploration of targeting methods, use in special populations, and accelerated protocols is encouraged. This article provides an updated overview of topics relevant to the administration of TMS for depression and summarizes expert, consensus opinion on the practice of TMS in the United States.

Efficacy of sequential primary motor and prefrontal cortices intermittent Theta burst stimulation in persistent somatoform PAIN disorder (TAP-PAIN): A randomized sham-controlled pilot trial

Aim

There is a need to elucidate intermittent Theta burst stimulation (iTBS) as a novel treatment in persistent somatoform pain disorder (PSPD).

Methods

Twenty patients were randomly allocated to active iTBS (n = 11) and sham iTBS (n = 9) and received 10 iTBS sessions, 2 sessions per day, sequentially to primary motor and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices for 5 days in a week. Each iTBS session comprised of 2 sec. per train of 10 bursts (3 pulses per burst at 50 Hz; total 30 pulses) and were given with a gap of 5 Hz, total of 20 trains, and 600 pulses. Visual Analogue Scale, Brief Pain Inventory and Global Pain Scale (GPS), Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale - Anxiety, World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale-brief, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index were applied at baseline, after last session, and at 2 weeks after last TBS session. Intention to treat analysis was conducted.

Results

Both groups were comparable for baseline psychopathology scores including clinical variables like age (t = 0.865; P = 0.398), duration of illness (t = 1.600; P = 0.127), and motor threshold (t = 0.304; P = 0.765). On repeated measures ANOVA, a significant within-group time effect for VAS, BPI-Severity, BPI-Interference, BDI - II, MADRS, HAM-A, and WHOQOL- BREF was found for active and sham TBS groups, respectively. GPS scores had significant within-group (active) * time interaction (F = 11.651; P = .001; ηp2 = 0.538) and between-group * time interaction (F = 3.407; P = 0.044; ηp2 = 0.159). However, between-group * time effect interaction was lost after covariance (F = 1.726; P = 0.196; ηp2 = 0.110).

Conclusion

No major adverse effects were reported. Our pilot trial concludes that safe therapeutic efficacy of iTBS in PSPD is inconclusive. Lower total number of sessions along with small sample size may limit the study findings.

Impact of antidepressant medication on the analgetic effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of neuropathic pain. Preliminary findings from a registry study

OBJECTIVES

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been found to be effective in chronic neuropathic pain conditions. However, information about the combined effects of rTMS and antidepressant treatment is scarce. We studied the outcome of rTMS and concurrent antidepressant treatment in patients with neuropathic pain.

METHODS

In this retrospective, real-world study, 34 patients with neuropathic pain, who were considered resistant or not benefitting from conventional treatment, received rTMS treatment between 2017 and 2020. Pain-related factors were measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Global Impression of Change (GIC), and Beck Depression Inventory.

RESULTS

A decrease in pain intensity and pain interference assessed with NRS was observed after 10 treatment sessions in 16 patients. The impression of change was positive in 20 patients. Half of the patients (n=17) used antidepressant medication, while half (n=17) did not. A concurrent use of antidepressants with therapeutic rTMS was significantly linked with less pain intensity relief when compared with the nonuse of antidepressants (p=0.019). The impression of change was significantly in favor of the antidepressant nonuser group (p=0.002). No group differences in pain interference were found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic rTMS for neuropathic pain is plausibly sensitive to interference with antidepressant medication. The exact mechanism of our findings remains to be elucidated; confirmatory studies are warranted.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment of major depressive disorder and comorbid chronic pain: response rates and neurophysiologic biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) and chronic pain are highly comorbid, and pain symptoms are associated with a poorer response to antidepressant medication treatment. It is unclear whether comorbid pain also is associated with a poorer response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS).

METHODS

162 MDD subjects received 30 sessions of 10 Hz rTMS treatment administered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with depression and pain symptoms measured before and after treatment. For a subset of 96 patients, a resting-state electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded at baseline. Clinical outcome was compared between subjects with and without comorbid pain, and the relationships among outcome, pain severity, individual peak alpha frequency (PAF), and PAF phase-coherence in the EEG were examined.

RESULTS

64.8% of all subjects reported pain, and both depressive and pain symptoms were significantly reduced after rTMS treatment, irrespective of age or gender. Patients with severe pain were 27% less likely to respond to MDD treatment than pain-free individuals. PAF was positively associated with pain severity. PAF phase-coherence in the somatosensory and default mode networks was significantly lower for MDD subjects with pain who failed to respond to MDD treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain symptoms improved after rTMS to left DLPFC in MDD irrespective of age or gender, although the presence of chronic pain symptoms reduced the likelihood of treatment response. Individual PAF and baseline phase-coherence in the sensorimotor and midline regions may represent predictors of rTMS treatment outcome in comorbid pain and MDD.

Sex differences in chronic pain-induced mental disorders: Mechanisms of cerebral circuitry

Mental disorders such as anxiety and depression induced by chronic pain are common in clinical practice, and there are significant sex differences in their epidemiology. However, the circuit mechanism of this difference has not been fully studied, as preclinical studies have traditionally excluded female rodents. Recently, this oversight has begun to be resolved and studies including male and female rodents are revealing sex differences in the neurobiological processes behind mental disorder features. This paper reviews the structural functions involved in the injury perception circuit and advanced emotional cortex circuit. In addition, we also summarize the latest breakthroughs and insights into sex differences in neuromodulation through endogenous dopamine, 5-hydroxytryptamine, GABAergic inhibition, norepinephrine, and peptide pathways like oxytocin, as well as their receptors. By comparing sex differences, we hope to identify new therapeutic targets to offer safer and more effective treatments.

Efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic facial pain of two consecutive treatment periods of rTMS applied over the facial motor cortex, using protocols differing in stimulation frequency, duration, and train pattern

OBJECTIVE

We conducted an open-label cross-over study assessing the global effect of two high-frequency protocols of electric-field navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeted to functional facial motor cortex and comparing their efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic facial pain. Outcome predictors were also assessed.

METHODS

We randomized twenty consecutive patients with chronic facial pain (post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain, n=14; persistent idiopathic facial pain, n=4; secondary trigeminal neuralgia, n=2) to receive two distinct 5-day rTMS interventions (10Hz, 2400 pulses and 20Hz, 3600 pulses) separated by six weeks. The target area was assessed by mapping of lower face representation. The primary endpoint was the change in weekly mean of pain intensity (numeric rating scale, NRS) between the baseline and therapy week (1^st week), and follow-up weeks (2^nd and 3^rd weeks) for each rTMS intervention. Response was defined using a combination scale including the patient's global impression of change and continuance with maintenance treatment.

RESULTS

Overall, pain intensity NRS decreased from 7.4 at baseline to 5.9 ten weeks later, after the second rTMS intervention (p=0.009). The repetition of the treatment had a significant effect (F=4.983, p=0.043) indicating that the NRS scores are lower during the second four weeks period. Eight (40%) patients were responders, 4 (20%) exhibited a modest effect, 4 (20%) displayed no effect, and 4 (20%) experienced worsening of pain. High disability and high pain intensity (>7) predicted a better outcome (p=0.043 and p=0.045). Female gender, shorter duration of pain and low Beck Anxiety Inventory scores showed a trend towards a better outcome (p=0.052, 0.060 and 0.055, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency rTMS targeted to face M1 alleviates treatment resistant chronic facial pain. Repeated treatment improves the analgesic effect. A protocol with higher frequency (above 10Hz), longer session duration (more than 20 minutes) and higher number of pulses (above 2400 pulses/session) did not improve the outcome. The results support early consideration of rTMS.

Antidepressant treatment outcomes in patients with and without comorbid physical or psychiatric disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Many patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) experience substantial impairment despite the availability of efficacious treatments. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare antidepressant outcomes in MDD with or without physical or psychiatric comorbidities.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, and PsycInfo were searched up to May 14th, 2020 using keywords including MDD, antidepressant, medication, and comorbid. 1915 studies were reviewed. Studies that performed a direct and quantitative comparison of antidepressant effect in patients with MDD with or without comorbidities were included. Study characteristics and primary outcomes were extracted. Continuous and dichotomous variables were considered using standardized mean difference (SMD). Heterogeneity was measured using χ² and I² tests. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and NIH Quality Assessment Tool.

RESULTS

26 studies met selection criteria. Studies of physical (6 studies; I² = 57.69%, p = 0.04) and psychiatric comorbidities (20 studies; I² = 75.75%, p < 0.001) were heterogeneous. When compared to patients with MDD without comorbidities, those with physical (SMD = -0.19, 95% CI: -0.30 to -0.08, p = 0.001; 1910 and 2905 patients with or without comorbidities) or psychiatric comorbidities (SMD = -0.20, 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.095, p < 0.001; 4308 and 6867 patients with or without comorbidities) had worse antidepressant outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

Our limitations included aggregating the comorbidities into physical and psychiatric comorbidities and the high heterogeneity of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review provides updated evidence demonstrating that patients with MDD and physical or psychiatric comorbidities experience worse antidepressant outcomes.

Analgesic Effect of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review

Introduction

The objective of this review is to systematically summarize the consensus on best practices for different NP conditions of the two most commonly utilized noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) technologies, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

Methods

PubMed was searched according to the predetermined keywords and criteria. Only English language studies and studies published up to January 31, 2020 were taken into consideration. Meta-analyses, reviews, and systematic reviews were excluded first, and those related to animal studies or involving healthy volunteers were also excluded. Finally, 29 studies covering 826 NP patients were reviewed.

Results

The results from the 24 enrolled studies and 736 NP patients indicate that rTMS successfully relieved the pain symptoms of 715 (97.1%) NP patients. Also, five studies involving 95 NP patients (81.4%) also showed that tDCS successfully relieved NP. In the included studied, the M1 region plays a key role in the analgesic treatment of NIBS. The motor evoked potentials (MEPs), the 10–20 electroencephalography system (EEG 10/20 system), and neuro-navigation methods are used in clinical practice to locate therapeutic targets. Based on the results of the review, the stimulation parameters of rTMS that best induce an analgesic effect are a stimulation frequency of 10–20 Hz, a stimulation intensity of 80–120% of RMT, 1000–2000 pulses, and 5–10 sessions, and the most effective parameters of tDCS are a current intensity of 2 mA, a session duration of 20–30 min, and 5–10 sessions.

Conclusions

Our systematically reviewed the evidence for positive and negative responses to rTMS and tDCS for NP patient care and underscores the analgesic efficacy of NIBS in patients with NP. The treatment of NP should allow the design of optimal treatments for individual patients.

Effects of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the vegetative state

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during vegetative state (VS). Between May 2017 and November 2018, 95 patients were treated in the Coma Recovery Department of the Central Hospital of Jinzhou. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 32 patients in VS caused by brain injury were enrolled. The patients were assigned into rTMS and control groups in a non-randomized manner. All patients received JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) scores and underwent motor evoked potential (MEP) latency and central motor conduction time (CMCT) measurement before the first treatment and after 20 days of treatment, which was the end of the study. Following 20 days of treatment, a significant increase was observed in the CRS-R scores of patients in the rTMS group compared with those obtained at pretreatment (P<0.001). An increase in the CRS-R scores of the control group was also observed compared with the pretreatment scores (P=0.035). The change in CRS-R scores (P<0.001) and improved conscious state rate (P=0.0016) were significantly different between the two groups. A significant decrease in MEP (P<0.001) and CMCT (P<0.001) was observed in the rTMS group compared with measurements obtained at pretreatment, whereas no significant decrease was observed in the control group (P=0.693; P=0.070). The changes in MEP (P<0.001) and CMCT (P<0.001) between the two groups were statistically significant. In conclusion, 10 Hz rTMS of the right DLPFC in early disorders of consciousness is feasible and efficient. rTMS treatment could improve patient state of awareness and accelerate patient recovery in VS.

Connectivity between the anterior insula and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex links early symptom improvement to treatment response

BACKGROUND

Early improvement (EI) following treatment with antidepressants is a widely reported predictor to the treatment response. This study aimed to identify the resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) and its related clinical features that link the treatment response at the time of EI.

METHODS

This study included 23 first-episode treatment-naive patients with MDD. After 2 weeks of antidepressant treatment, these patients received 3.0 Tesla resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning and were subgrouped into an EI group (N = 13) and a non-EI group (N = 10). Using the anterior insula (rAI) as a seed region, this study identified the rs-FC that were associated with both EI and the treatment response at week 12, and further tested the associations of the identified rs-FC with either the clinical features or the early symptom improvement.

RESULTS

Rs-FC between rAI and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) was associated with EI (t₂₁ = -6.091, p = 0.022 after FDR correction for multiple comparisons). This rs-FC was also associated with an interaction between EI and the treatment response at the week 12 (t₂₁ = -5.361, p = 6.37e-5). Moreover, among the clinical features, this rs-FC was associated with the early symptom improvement in the insomnia, somatic symptoms, and anxiety symptoms, and these early symptom improvements were associated with the treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Rs-FC between the rAI and the left dlPFC played a crucial role in the early antidepressant effect, which linked the treatment response. The early treatment effect relating to rAI may represent an early symptom improvement in self-perceptual anxiety, somatic symptoms and insomnia.