1
|
Chakrabarti S, Jolly AJ, Singh P, Yadhav N. Role of adjunctive nonpharmacological strategies for treatment of rapid-cycling bipolar disorder. World J Psychiatry 2023; 13:495-510. [PMID: 37701540 PMCID: PMC10494771 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i8.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Rapid-cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) is a phase of bipolar disorder defined by the presence of ≥ 4 mood episodes in a year. It is a common phenomenon characterized by greater severity, a predominance of depression, higher levels of disability, and poorer overall outcomes. It is resistant to treatment by conventional pharmacotherapy. The existing literature underlines the scarcity of evi-dence and the gaps in knowledge about the optimal treatment strategies for RCBD. However, most reviews have considered only pharmacological treatment options for RCBD. Given the treatment-refractory nature of RCBD, nonpharmacological interventions could augment medications but have not been adequately examined. This review carried out an updated and comprehensive search for evidence regarding the role of nonpharmacological therapies as adjuncts to medications in RCBD. We identified 83 reviews and meta-analyses concerning the treatment of RCBD. Additionally, we found 42 reports on adjunctive nonpharmacological treatments in RCBD. Most of the evidence favoured concomitant electroconvulsive therapy as an acute and maintenance treatment. There was pre-liminary evidence to suggest that chronotherapeutic treatments can provide better outcomes when combined with medications. The research on adjunctive psychotherapy was particularly scarce but suggested that psychoeducation, cognitive behavioural therapy, family interventions, and supportive psychotherapy may be helpful. The overall quality of evidence was poor and suffered from several methodological shortcomings. There is a need for more methodologically sound research in this area, although clinicians can use the existing evidence to select and individualize nonpharmacological treatment options for better management of RCBD. Patient summaries are included to highlight some of the issues concerning the implementation of adjunctive nonpharmacological treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Subho Chakrabarti
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, Chandigarh UT, India
| | - Amal J Jolly
- Department of Psychiatry, Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley DY2 8PS, West Midlands, United Kingdom
| | - Pranshu Singh
- Department of Psychiatry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India
| | - Nidhi Yadhav
- Department of Psychiatry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, Chandigarh UT, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Icick R, Melle I, Etain B, Høegh MC, Gard S, Aminoff SR, Leboyer M, Andreassen OA, Belzeaux R, Henry C, Bjella TD, Kahn JP, Steen NE, Bellivier F, Lagerberg TV. Preventive Medication Patterns in Bipolar Disorder and Their Relationship With Comorbid Substance Use Disorders in a Cross-National Observational Study. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:813256. [PMID: 35592382 PMCID: PMC9110763 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.813256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The potential role of sub-optimal pharmacological treatment in the poorer outcomes observed in bipolar disorder (BD) with vs. without comorbid substance use disorders (SUDs) is not known. Thus, we investigated whether patients with BD and comorbid SUD had different medication regimens than those with BD alone, in samples from France and Norway, focusing on compliance to international guidelines. METHODS Seven hundred and seventy patients from France and Norway with reliably ascertained BD I or II (68% BD-I) were included. Medication information was obtained from patients and hospital records, and preventive treatment was categorized according to compliance to guidelines. We used Bayesian and regression analyses to investigate associations between SUD comorbidity and medication. In the Norwegian subsample, we also investigated association with lack of medication. RESULTS Comorbid SUDs were as follows: current tobacco smoking, 26%, alcohol use disorder (AUD), 16%; cannabis use disorder (CUD), 10%; other SUDs, 5%. Compliance to guidelines for preventive medication was lacking in 8%, partial in 44%, and complete in 48% of the sample. Compliance to guidelines was not different in BD with and without SUD comorbidity, as was supported by Bayesian analyses (highest Bayes Factor = 0.16). Cross national differences in treatment regimens led us to conduct country-specific adjusted regression analyses, showing that (1) CUD was associated with increased antipsychotics use in France (OR = 2.4, 95% CI = 1.4-3.9, p = 0.001), (2) current tobacco smoking was associated with increased anti-epileptics use in Norway (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.9-11, p < 0.001), and (3) AUD was associated with decreased likelihood of being medicated in Norway (OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.04-1.3, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION SUD comorbidity in BD was overall not associated with different pharmacological treatment in our sample, and not related to the level of compliance to guidelines. We found country-specific associations between comorbid SUDs and specific medications that warrant further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romain Icick
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France.,INSERM U1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Ingrid Melle
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bruno Etain
- FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France.,INSERM U1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Saint-Louis - Lariboisière - F. Widal, Département de Psychiatrie, Paris, France
| | - Margrethe Collier Høegh
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sébastien Gard
- INSERM U1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Hôpital Charles Perrens, Centre Expert Trouble Bipolaire, Pôle de Psychiatrie Générale et Universitaire (3/4/7), Bordeaux, France
| | - Sofie R Aminoff
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Early Intervention in Psychosis Advisory Unit for South East Norway, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marion Leboyer
- FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France.,Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Laboratoire Neuro-Psychiatrie Translationnelle, Créteil, France.,Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), HU Henri Mondor, Département Medico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d'Addictologie (DMU ADAPT), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire de Médecine de Precision (FHU IMPACT), Créteil, France
| | - Ole A Andreassen
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Raoul Belzeaux
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille (AP-HM), Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite, Pôle de Psychiatrie, INT-UMR 7289, CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Chantal Henry
- Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Department of Psychiatry, Service Hospitalo-Universitaire, GHU Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences, Paris, France
| | - Thomas D Bjella
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jean-Pierre Kahn
- Université de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy et Pôle de Psychiatrie et Psychologie Clinique, Centre Psychothérapique de Nancy, Laxou, France
| | - Nils Eiel Steen
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Frank Bellivier
- FondaMental Foundation, Créteil, France.,INSERM U1144, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, GH Saint-Louis - Lariboisière - F. Widal, Département de Psychiatrie, Paris, France
| | - Trine Vik Lagerberg
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research (NORMENT), Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nierenberg AA, Harris MG, Kazdin AE, Puac-Polanco V, Sampson N, Vigo DV, Chiu WT, Ziobrowski HN, Alonso J, Altwaijri Y, Borges G, Bunting B, Caldas-de-Almeida JM, Haro JM, Hu CY, Kiejna A, Lee S, McGrath JJ, Navarro-Mateu F, Posada-Villa J, Scott KM, Stagnaro JC, Viana MC, Kessler RC. Perceived helpfulness of bipolar disorder treatment: Findings from the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. Bipolar Disord 2021; 23:565-583. [PMID: 33638300 PMCID: PMC8387507 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.13066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine patterns and predictors of perceived treatment helpfulness for mania/hypomania and associated depression in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys. METHODS Face-to-face interviews with community samples across 15 countries found n = 2,178 who received lifetime mania/hypomania treatment and n = 624 with lifetime mania/hypomania who received lifetime major depression treatment. These respondents were asked whether treatment was ever helpful and, if so, the number of professionals seen before receiving helpful treatment. Patterns and predictors of treatment helpfulness were examined separately for mania/hypomania and depression. RESULTS 63.1% (mania/hypomania) and 65.1% (depression) of patients reported ever receiving helpful treatment. However, only 24.5-22.5% were helped by the first professional seen, which means that the others needed to persist in help seeking after initial unhelpful treatments in order to find helpful treatment. Projections find only 22.9% (mania/hypomania) and 43.3% (depression) would persist through a series of unhelpful treatments but that the proportion helped would increase substantially if persistence increased. Few patient-level significant predictors of helpful treatment emerged and none consistently either across the two components (i.e., provider-level helpfulness and persistence after earlier unhelpful treatment) or for both mania/hypomania and depression. Although prevalence of treatment was higher in high-income than low/middle-income countries, proportional helpfulness among treated cases was nearly identical in the two groups of countries. CONCLUSIONS Probability of patients with mania/hypomania and associated depression obtaining helpful treatment might increase substantially if persistence in help-seeking increased after initially unhelpful treatments, although this could require seeing numerous additional treatment providers. In addition to investigating reasons for initial treatments not being helpful, messages reinforcing the importance of persistence should be emphasized to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew A. Nierenberg
- Dauten Family Center for Bipolar Treatment Innovation, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meredith G. Harris
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan E. Kazdin
- Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Victor Puac-Polanco
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nancy Sampson
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel V. Vigo
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wai Tat Chiu
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hannah N. Ziobrowski
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jordi Alonso
- Health Services Research Unit, IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER en Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain
- Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Yasmin Altwaijri
- Epidemiology Section, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Guilherme Borges
- National Institute of Psychiatry Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Brendan Bunting
- School of Psychology, Ulster University, Londonderry, United Kingdom
| | - José Miguel Caldas-de-Almeida
- Lisbon Institute of Global Mental Health and Chronic Diseases Research Center (CEDOC), Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, CIBERSAM, Universitat de Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Psychology, College of Education, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Chi-yi Hu
- Shenzhen Institute of Mental Health & Shenzhen Kangning Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Andrzej Kiejna
- Psychology Research Unit for Public Health, WSB University, Torun, Poland
| | - Sing Lee
- Department of Psychiatry, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong
| | - John J. McGrath
- National Centre for Register-based Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Queensland Brain Institute, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research, The Park Centre for Mental Health, Wacol, Queensland, Australia
| | - Fernando Navarro-Mateu
- UDIF-SM, Servicio Murciano de Salud, Murcia, Región de Murcia, Spain
- IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia, Región de Murcia, Spain
- CIBERESP, Murcia, Región de Murcia, Spain
| | - José Posada-Villa
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca University, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Kate M. Scott
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
| | - Juan Carlos Stagnaro
- Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Maria Carmen Viana
- Department of Social Medicine, Postgraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
| | - Ronald C. Kessler
- Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|