1
|
Fang M, Fan Z, Liu S, Feng S, Zhu H, Yin D, Jia H, Wang G. Preventive interventions for individuals at risk of developing bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord 2023; 340:53-63. [PMID: 37459972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore whether early interventions can reduce affective symptoms and have long-term benefits among individuals at risk of bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched. The primary outcome was continuous symptom scores before and after treatment. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted for each outcome arm studied and pooled mean difference estimates were calculated. RESULTS The search identified 10 controlled studies involving 425 participants and 6 single-arm studies involving 90 participants. For controlled trials, meta-analysis showed that the interventions led to greater reduction in clinical global score than placebo (standardized mean differences (SMD) = -0.96, 95 % CI:-1.32, -0.60), and supported a long-term longitudinal effect for pharmacotherapy (SMD = -0.42, 95 % CI: -0.79, -0.05). For single-arm trials, both pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy showed efficacy for depressive symptoms, while pharmacotherapy only showed efficacy for hypomania symptoms (effect size (ES) = -9.16, 95 % CI:-11.29, -7.04). Discontinuation of pharmacotherapy due to adverse effects did not show a difference. LIMITATIONS The primary limitations are the small number of RCTs and the influence of medication dosage. CONCLUSIONS Based on the limited available data, early interventions show efficacy for individuals at risk of BD. Psychological therapy might be more beneficial for depressive symptoms and have long-term benefits for hypomania. Pharmacotherapy may be appropriate in situations of severe hypomanic symptoms and the poor functioning. Large, well-designed, double-blind -controlled trials are needed to make solid conclusions about the efficacy of early interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Fang
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zili Fan
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Shanshan Liu
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Sitong Feng
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Zhu
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Dongqing Yin
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hongxiao Jia
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Gang Wang
- The National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital & the Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Salazar de Pablo G, Cabras A, Pereira J, Castro Santos H, de Diego H, Catalan A, González-Pinto A, Birmaher B, Correll CU, Fusar-Poli P. Predicting bipolar disorder I/II in individuals at clinical high-risk: Results from a systematic review. J Affect Disord 2023; 325:778-786. [PMID: 36657494 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.01.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION No systematic review has estimated the consistency and the magnitude of the risk of developing bipolar disorder I-II (BD-I/II) in individuals at clinical high risk for bipolar disorder (CHR-BD). METHODS PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched until April 2022 in this pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42022346515) PRISMA-compliant systematic review to identify longitudinal studies in individuals meeting pre-defined CHR-BD criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and results were systematically synthesized around CHR-BD criteria across follow-up periods and different subgroups. RESULTS Altogether, 13 studies were included reporting on nine prospective independent cohorts (n = 678 individuals at CHR-BD). The mean age of participants was 15.7 years (range 10.1-22.6 years), and 54.2 % were females. The most common CHR-BD subgroup was subthreshold mania (55.5 %), followed by BD-Not Otherwise Specified (BD-NOS: 33.3 %). Development of BD I/II ranged from 7.1 % to 23.4 % after 2 years. Development of BD-I ranged from 3.4 % at 4 years to 23 % at 8 years. Development of BD-II ranged from 10 % at 2 years to 63.8 % at 4 years. The risk of developing BD-I appeared highest in those meeting BD-NOS criteria (23 % at eight years). Predictors of development of BD were identified but remained mostly unreplicated. The quality of the included studies was moderate (NOS = 5.2 ± 1.1). CONCLUSIONS Emerging data from research studies point towards the promising utility of CHR-BD criteria. These studies may pave the way to the next generation of research, implementing detection, prognostication, and preventive interventions in individuals at CHR-BD identified and followed in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IiSGM), CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Anna Cabras
- Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Joana Pereira
- Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Héctor de Diego
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Catalan
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Psychiatry Department, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, OSI Bilbao-Basurto, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Centro de Investigación en Red de Salud Mental, (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Plaza de Cruces 12, 48903 Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Ana González-Pinto
- Departmennt of Psychiatry, Araba University Hospital, Bioaraba Research Institute, CIBER-ISCIII-Salud Mental, Vitoria, Spain; Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Boris Birmaher
- Western Psychiatric Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA, USA
| | - Christoph U Correll
- Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Molecular Medicine, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Manhasset, NY, USA; Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paolo Fusar-Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical-detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, UK; Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; OASIS service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; National Institute for Health Research, Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brickman HM, Fristad MA. Psychosocial Treatments for Bipolar Disorder in Children and Adolescents. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2022; 18:291-327. [PMID: 35216522 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-072220-021237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Evidence suggests that adjunctive psychosocial intervention for the treatment of pediatric bipolar spectrum disorders (BPSDs) is effective, feasible, and highly accepted as both an acute and maintenance treatment for youth with BPSD diagnoses as well as a preventive treatment for high-risk youth who are either asymptomatic or exhibit subsyndromal mood symptoms. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of all known evidence-based interventions, including detailed descriptions of treatment targets and core components, results of clinical trials, and updated research on mediators and moderators of treatment efficacy. Treatments are presented systematically according to level of empirical support (i.e., well established, probably efficacious, possibly efficacious, experimental, or questionable); upcoming and ongoing trials are included when possible. In line with a staging approach, preventive interventions are presented separately. Recommendations for best practices based on age, stage, and additional evidence-based child and family factors shown to affect treatment outcomes are provided. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, Volume 18 is May 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haley M Brickman
- Big Lots Behavioral Health Services and Division of Child and Family Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; ,
| | - Mary A Fristad
- Big Lots Behavioral Health Services and Division of Child and Family Psychiatry, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; ,
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stanislaus S, Coello K, Kjærstad HL, Sletved KSO, Seeberg I, Frost M, Bardram JE, Jensen RN, Vinberg M, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Kessing LV. Prevalences of comorbid anxiety disorder and daily smartphone-based self-reported anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed bipolar disorder. EVIDENCE-BASED MENTAL HEALTH 2021; 24:137-144. [PMID: 34083204 PMCID: PMC10231557 DOI: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Around 40% of patients with bipolar disorder (BD) additionally have anxiety disorder. The prevalence of anxiety in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their first-degree relatives (UR) has not been investigated.ObjectiveTo investigate (1) the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety diagnosis in patients with newly diagnosed BD and their UR, (2) sociodemographic and clinical differences between patients with and without a comorbid anxiety diagnosis and (3) the association between smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety and observer-based ratings of anxiety and functioning, respectively. METHODS We recruited 372 patients with BD and 116 of their UR. Daily smartphone-based data were provided from 125 patients. SCAN was used to assess comorbid anxiety diagnoses. FINDINGS In patients with BD, the prevalence of a comorbid anxiety disorder was 11.3% (N=42) and 10.3% and 5.9% in partial and full remission, respectively. In UR, the prevalence was 6.9%. Patients with a comorbid anxiety disorder had longer illness duration (p=0.016) and higher number of affective episodes (p=0.011). Smartphone-based patient-reported anxiety symptoms were associated with ratings of anxiety and impaired functioning (p<0.001). LIMITATIONS The SCAN interviews to diagnose comorbid anxiety disorder were carried out regardless of the participants' mood state.Clinical implicationsThe lower prevalence of anxiety in newly diagnosed BD than in later stages of BD indicates that anxiety increases with progression of BD. Comorbid anxiety seems associated with poorer clinical outcomes and functioning and smartphones are clinically useful for monitoring anxiety symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02888262).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharleny Stanislaus
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Klara Coello
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Hanne Lie Kjærstad
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | | | - Ida Seeberg
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Mads Frost
- Monsenso, Monsenso Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jakob Eyvind Bardram
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Rasmus Nejst Jensen
- Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Hilleroed, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Maj Vinberg
- Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Hilleroed, Hovedstaden, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Maria Faurholt-Jepsen
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
| | - Lars Vedel Kessing
- Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Region Hovedstadens Psykiatri, Kobenhavn, Hovedstaden, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones WT, Peters S, Byrne RE, Shiers D, Law H, Parker S. "It felt very special, it felt customised to me"-A qualitative investigation of the experiences of participating in a clinical trial of CBT for young people at risk of bipolar disorder. Psychol Psychother 2021; 94:686-703. [PMID: 33063921 PMCID: PMC8451762 DOI: 10.1111/papt.12313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Bipolar at Risk Trial (BART) was a feasibility randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in young people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder (BD). This qualitative study aimed to investigate participants' experiences of trial involvement, and the acceptability of CBT for this population. DESIGN Participants were those identified as being at risk of bipolar disorder, determined by current symptoms or family history. A purposive sample of twenty-one participants from both the intervention and TAU arms of the trial was recruited. METHODS Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted by service user researchers (13 participants had received therapy and 8 TAU). Interviews were audio recorded with consent from participants and transcribed verbatim. NVivo 11 Pro software was used to conduct an inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Super-ordinate themes were "adaptability and flexibility," "feeling understood and valued," and "relevance of study and intervention" which had two sub-themes-"value of the trial therapy" and "acceptability of trial processes." Participating in the trial and having therapy enabled participants to feel understood and valued by research assistants (RAs) and therapists. Participants viewed therapy as relevant to their current concerns and valued adaptability and flexibility of RAs and therapists. CONCLUSIONS Findings highlight the importance and value of flexibility, adaptability, and understanding in relationships between participants and trial staff. Findings also indicate that the trial processes and CBT focusing on mood swings are acceptable and relevant to participants from this at risk population. PRACTITIONER POINTS Young people at risk of bipolar disorder value a flexible approach to assessments and therapy, developing a rapport with research assistants and therapists and opening up to them when they feel comfortable to do so. CBT focusing on coping with mood swings was acceptable to the majority of participants who received it and it was perceived as helpful in ways that were personal to each participant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Theresa Jones
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - Sarah Peters
- Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - Rory Edward Byrne
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK
| | - David Shiers
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Primary Care and Health SciencesKeele UniversityUK
| | - Heather Law
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Youth Mental Health Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK
| | - Sophie Parker
- The Psychosis Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK,Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterUK,Youth Mental Health Research UnitGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation TrustUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fusar‐Poli P, Correll CU, Arango C, Berk M, Patel V, Ioannidis JP. Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people. World Psychiatry 2021; 20:200-221. [PMID: 34002494 PMCID: PMC8129854 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 170] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Preventive approaches have latterly gained traction for improving mental health in young people. In this paper, we first appraise the conceptual foundations of preventive psychiatry, encompassing the public health, Gordon's, US Institute of Medicine, World Health Organization, and good mental health frameworks, and neurodevelopmentally-sensitive clinical staging models. We then review the evidence supporting primary prevention of psychotic, bipolar and common mental disorders and promotion of good mental health as potential transformative strategies to reduce the incidence of these disorders in young people. Within indicated approaches, the clinical high-risk for psychosis paradigm has received the most empirical validation, while clinical high-risk states for bipolar and common mental disorders are increasingly becoming a focus of attention. Selective approaches have mostly targeted familial vulnerability and non-genetic risk exposures. Selective screening and psychological/psychoeducational interventions in vulnerable subgroups may improve anxiety/depressive symptoms, but their efficacy in reducing the incidence of psychotic/bipolar/common mental disorders is unproven. Selective physical exercise may reduce the incidence of anxiety disorders. Universal psychological/psychoeducational interventions may improve anxiety symptoms but not prevent depressive/anxiety disorders, while universal physical exercise may reduce the incidence of anxiety disorders. Universal public health approaches targeting school climate or social determinants (demographic, economic, neighbourhood, environmental, social/cultural) of mental disorders hold the greatest potential for reducing the risk profile of the population as a whole. The approach to promotion of good mental health is currently fragmented. We leverage the knowledge gained from the review to develop a blueprint for future research and practice of preventive psychiatry in young people: integrating universal and targeted frameworks; advancing multivariable, transdiagnostic, multi-endpoint epidemiological knowledge; synergically preventing common and infrequent mental disorders; preventing physical and mental health burden together; implementing stratified/personalized prognosis; establishing evidence-based preventive interventions; developing an ethical framework, improving prevention through education/training; consolidating the cost-effectiveness of preventive psychiatry; and decreasing inequalities. These goals can only be achieved through an urgent individual, societal, and global level response, which promotes a vigorous collaboration across scientific, health care, societal and governmental sectors for implementing preventive psychiatry, as much is at stake for young people with or at risk for emerging mental disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Fusar‐Poli
- Early Psychosis: Interventions and Clinical‐detection (EPIC) Lab, Department of Psychosis StudiesInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK,OASIS Service, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK,Department of Brain and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly
| | - Christoph U. Correll
- Department of PsychiatryZucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell HealthGlen OaksNYUSA,Department of Psychiatry and Molecular MedicineZucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/NorthwellHempsteadNYUSA,Center for Psychiatric NeuroscienceFeinstein Institute for Medical ResearchManhassetNYUSA,Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCharité Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlinGermany
| | - Celso Arango
- Department of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryInstitute of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañónMadridSpain,Health Research Institute (IiGSM), School of MedicineUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain,Biomedical Research Center for Mental Health (CIBERSAM)MadridSpain
| | - Michael Berk
- Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, School of Medicine, Deakin UniversityBarwon HealthGeelongVICAustralia,Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia,Orygen Youth HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia,Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental HealthUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneVICAustralia
| | - Vikram Patel
- Department of Global Health and Social MedicineHarvard University T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA,Department of Global Health and PopulationHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMAUSA
| | - John P.A. Ioannidis
- Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of MedicineStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA,Department of Biomedical Data ScienceStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA,Department of Epidemiology and Population HealthStanford UniversityStanfordCAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Del Favero E, Montemagni C, Bozzatello P, Brasso C, Riccardi C, Rocca P. The Management of Prodromal Symptoms of Bipolar Disorder: Available Options and Future Perspectives. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 57:medicina57060545. [PMID: 34071356 PMCID: PMC8229021 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57060545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The onset of prodromal symptoms in subjects who are at familial or clinical risk for bipolar disorder could be considered as an important alarm bell for the development of the disease and should be carefully detected. The management of prodromes in bipolar high-risk patients appears to be an important means of prevention; nevertheless, at the moment, there aren’t clear and widely shared treatment indications. The aim of this review is to summarize the available treatment options (pharmacological, psychosocial and nutraceutical) for the management of prodromal symptoms in subjects who are at familial or clinical risk for bipolar disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Del Favero
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy; (E.D.F.); (P.B.); (C.B.); (C.R.)
| | - Cristiana Montemagni
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Salute Mentale, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy;
| | - Paola Bozzatello
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy; (E.D.F.); (P.B.); (C.B.); (C.R.)
| | - Claudio Brasso
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy; (E.D.F.); (P.B.); (C.B.); (C.R.)
| | - Cecilia Riccardi
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy; (E.D.F.); (P.B.); (C.B.); (C.R.)
| | - Paola Rocca
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze “Rita Levi Montalcini”, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy; (E.D.F.); (P.B.); (C.B.); (C.R.)
- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze e Salute Mentale, A.O.U. Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, via Cherasco 11, 10126 Turin, Italy;
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vedel Kessing L, Ziersen SC, Andersen PK, Vinberg M. A nationwide population-based longitudinal study mapping psychiatric disorders during lifetime in siblings to patients with bipolar disorder. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2021; 143:284-293. [PMID: 33258104 DOI: 10.1111/acps.13263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to map rates and cumulative incidences of psychiatric disorders during lifetime for siblings to patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder compared with the general population. METHODS Danish nationwide population-based longitudinal register linkage study including 13,923 unaffected siblings to 19,955 patients with bipolar disorder and 278,460 unaffected control individuals from the general population matched according to year of birth and sex. Follow-up covered 22 years from 1995 to 2017. RESULTS Rates of 'any psychiatric disorder' among siblings compared with control individuals were constantly around twofold increased throughout lifespan whereas there was a bimodal age distribution of hazard ratios of bipolar disorder, unipolar disorder and use of alcohol or psychoactive drugs with the highest hazard ratios up to age 20 and above 60 years of age. Cumulative incidences from age 15 years of any psychiatric disorder were 44.2% at age 80 years for siblings versus 27.6% for control individuals and the corresponding numbers for bipolar disorder was 8.7% for siblings compared with 1.6% for control individuals. CONCLUSION Strategies to prevent onset of psychiatric illness in individuals with a first-generation family history of bipolar disorder should not be limited to adolescence and early adulthood but should be lifetime, likely with differentiated age-specific strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Vedel Kessing
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Simon Christoffer Ziersen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Kragh Andersen
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maj Vinberg
- Copenhagen Affective Disorder Research Center (CADIC), Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Centre North Zealand, Hillerød, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Early intervention for people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder: a systematic review of clinical trials. Lancet Psychiatry 2021; 8:64-75. [PMID: 32857954 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30188-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Early intervention approaches are built on the premise of preventing disability, burden, and cognitive sequelae caused by bipolar disorder. The objective of this systematic review was to characterise the effectiveness of all the available psychological and pharmacological treatments for early intervention in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019133420). We did a systematic search to identify studies published in ten databases up to March 27, 2020. Randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that assessed the effect of pharmacological or psychological interventions in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder were included. Studies of first episodes of mania were excluded. Eligible papers were assessed for quality and data were extracted. The primary outcomes were change in manic and depressive symptoms from baseline to endpoint. Of the 2856 citations retrieved by our search, 16 studies were included; five evaluated pharmacotherapeutic strategies (three randomised controlled trials and two open-label studies), ten assessed psychotherapeutic strategies (four randomised controlled trials and six open-label studies), and one randomised controlled trial assessed combination therapy; these 16 trials included a total of 755 participants at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. Quality assessment indicated fair to good quality for open-label studies, and a high risk of bias in four randomised controlled trials. Among the pharmacotherapeutic interventions, there is preliminary support for the efficacy of aripiprazole in reducing mood symptoms in people at high risk of developing bipolar disorder. Psychological interventions were effective for various outcomes. There was substantial methodological heterogeneity across studies. This systematic review underscores the need for multicentre, prospective, methodologically homogeneous studies evaluating conversion to bipolar disorder as an outcome measure.
Collapse
|
10
|
Tremain H, Fletcher K, Scott J, McEnery C, Berk M, Murray G. The influence of stage of illness on functional outcomes after psychological treatment in bipolar disorder: A systematic review. Bipolar Disord 2020; 22:666-692. [PMID: 32621794 DOI: 10.1111/bdi.12974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to advance understanding of stage of illness in bipolar disorder (BD), by interrogating the literature for evidence of an influence of stage of illness on functional (ie non-symptom) outcomes following psychosocial intervention. METHODS A systematic literature search following PRISMA guidelines was conducted to identify empirical studies of psychosocial interventions for established BD. To investigate stage as a predictor of three functional outcomes (general/social functioning, cognitive functioning and quality of life [QoL]), study samples were dichotomised into earlier and later stage using proxy measures identified in existing staging models. Findings were integrated using data-based convergent synthesis. RESULTS A total of 88 analyses from 62 studies were identified. Synthesis across studies suggested that psychosocial intervention was more likely to be effective for general functioning outcomes earlier in the course of established BD. No stage-related differences were found for cognitive or QoL outcomes. Exploratory investigations found some evidence of an interaction between specific intervention type and stage of illness in predicting outcomes. CONCLUSIONS A novel systematic review provided preliminary evidence that benefits general/social functioning may be more pronounced in earlier versus later stages of established BD. The review also generated hypotheses about a potential three-way interaction, whereby specific psychosocial interventions may be best placed to target functional outcomes in earlier versus later stage BD. The strength of conclusions is limited by the overall low-quality and significant heterogeneity of studies. Further research is urgently required to understand the impact of illness stage on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailey Tremain
- Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Kathryn Fletcher
- Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Jan Scott
- Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Academic Psychiatry, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Carla McEnery
- Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Vic, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| | - Michael Berk
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, Vic, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.,IMPACT Strategic Research Centre, School of Medicine, Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Vic, Australia.,The Department of Psychiatry and the Florey Institute for Neuroscience and Mental Health, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| | - Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Faculty of Health Arts and Design, Swinburne University, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Post RM, Goldstein BI, Birmaher B, Findling RL, Frey BN, DelBello MP, Miklowitz DJ. Toward prevention of bipolar disorder in at-risk children: Potential strategies ahead of the data. J Affect Disord 2020; 272:508-520. [PMID: 32553395 PMCID: PMC8986089 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the well-documented negative impact of untreated bipolar illness, approaches to early intervention in childhood-onset bipolar and related disorders are not well delineated. METHODS We reviewed the extant treatment literature on children at high risk for bipolar disorder, with definitions based on family history, childhood adversity, and prodromal symptoms. RESULTS A panoply of approaches have been described, but most interventions are based on an inadequate database to support their routine implementation. We classify early stage interventions as a function of their safety and tolerability with the hope that these might generate more rigorous study and a stronger database. LIMITATIONS Critics may rightly argue that identifying viable treatment methods is premature given our lack of ability to reliably predict illness trajectory in very young children. However, many of the psychosocial and pharmacological interventions we present could have nonspecific positive effects across a variety of symptoms, syndromes, and diagnoses, further enhancing the rationale for more rigorous study. CONCLUSIONS Early stage interventions have the potential to improve functioning in prodromal illness and exert long-term positive effects on the course of illness. Many of the safest interventions deserve consideration for implementation and dissemination studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert M Post
- Bipolar Collaborative Network, Professor of Psychiatry George Washington Medical School, Bethesda, MD, Washington, DC, United States.
| | - Benjamin I Goldstein
- Departments of Psychiatry and Pharmacology, University of Toronto; Centre for Youth Bipolar Disorder, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Canada
| | - Boris Birmaher
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Psychiatry Research Pathway, United States
| | - Robert L Findling
- Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Benicio N Frey
- Mood Disorders Program, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Women's Health Concerns Clinic, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Melissa P DelBello
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - David J Miklowitz
- Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Murray G. What Would Digital Early Intervention for Bipolar Disorder Look Like? Theoretical and Translational Considerations for Future Therapies. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:599. [PMID: 31507467 PMCID: PMC6715769 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
There are growing calls for the development of early intervention/preventive interventions for young people identified to be at risk of bipolar disorder (BD), and digital delivery appears to be a strong candidate delivery method. To date, no such interventions exist, and the aim of this perspective paper is to advance the literature by reviewing theoretical issues related to early intervention in BD and introducing a framework for design of feasible, acceptable, and effective online psychosocial interventions for this population. It is concluded that, by adopting an appropriate transdiagnostic and humanistic framework, and recognizing emerging tenets of digital psychotherapy development, testable online interventions for young people at risk of BD are within reach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greg Murray
- Centre for Mental Health, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|