An examination of eating disorder fears in imaginal exposure scripts

An Intensive time series investigation of the relationships across eating disorder-specific fear responses and behavior urges in partially remitted anorexia nervosa

Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious and persistent psychiatric illness. Many individuals with AN cycle between stages of remission (i.e., relapse), with research documenting that cognitive remission generally lags behind nutritional/weight restoration. Yet, little is known about which mechanisms promote movement from partial remission in AN (defined as nutritional, but not cognitive, recovery) to full remission. Fear-based processes, including avoidance and approach behaviors, likely contribute to the persistence of cognitive-behavioral AN symptoms after nutritional restoration. The current study used intensive longitudinal data to characterize these processes during partial remission (N = 41 participants with partially remitted AN; 4306 total observations). We aimed to a) characterize frequency of fear-based processes in real-time, b) investigate associations across fear-based processes and behavioral urges, and c) test if real-time associations among symptoms differed across commonly feared stimuli (e.g., food, social situations). On average, participants endorsed moderate fear and avoidance, with weight-gain fears rated higher than other feared stimuli. Momentary fear, avoidance, approach, and distress were all positively associated with AN behavior urges at one time-point and prospectively. Central symptoms and symptom connections differed across models with different feared stimuli. These findings provide empirical support for the theorized fear-avoidance-urge cycle in AN, which may contribute to the persistence of eating pathology during partial remission. Fear approach may be associated with temporary increases in urges, which should be considered during treatment. Future research should explore these associations in large, heterogeneous samples, and test the effectiveness of exposure-based interventions during partial remission.

Virtual food exposure with positive mood induction or social support to reduce food anxiety in anorexia nervosa: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Aversive emotions toward food and the consequences of eating are at the core of anorexia nervosa. Exposure therapy is effective to reduce anxiety and avoidance toward feared stimuli. Based on the inhibitory learning framework, this study examined the feasibility to induce social support or positive mood to enhance the impact of a single session virtual food exposure on food-related anxiety in anorexia nervosa.

METHOD

One hundred and forty-five patients were randomized to: (1) virtual food exposure (i.e., baseline condition), (2) virtual food exposure plus positive mood induction (i.e., positive mood condition), or (3) virtual food exposure plus social support (i.e., social support condition). They completed self-report assessments of anxiety toward virtual foods, general anxiety, positive mood, social support, and hunger, before and after virtual food exposure. Number of eye gazes and touches toward foods were recorded during the virtual reality exposure.

RESULTS

Patients had lower levels of anxiety toward virtual foods in the positive mood condition, compared to the baseline condition [F(2,141)  = 4.36, p = .015; medium effect size]. They also touched food items more often in the baseline condition. No other significant changes were found.

DISCUSSION

Virtual food exposure enhanced by positive mood induction seems a feasible approach to strengthen the impact of food exposure in anorexia nervosa.

PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE

This research contributes to the understanding of how patients with anorexia nervosa can be supported to overcome fear and anxiety around food. Virtual reality enables patients to expose themselves to difficult situations (e.g., kitchen with foods of various calorie contents) while experiencing positive stimuli, such as a loving and kind pet or a supportive avatar.

The role of developmental caregiving programming in modulating our affiliation tendency and the vulnerability to social anxiety and eating disorders

Attachment is the evolutionarily-established process through which humans create bonds with others to receive care from them. The phenomenon is as essential to our physical survival as it is to our psychological development. An increasing number of studies demonstrates that in sensitive periods during the early years of life, our brain circuitry is programmed in the interactions with our caregivers, with the imprinting of information over multiple attachment dimensions. Adopting a basic brain-computer analogy, we can think of this knowledge as the psycho-social firmware of our mind. According to a recently proposed extension of the classical three-dimensional view, one attachment dimension - somaticity - concerns the caregiver's task of reflecting and confirming the child's (internal) states - such as sensations, emotions, and representations - to support the child's ability to identify and define those entities autonomously. Relying on multidisciplinary evidence - from neuroscientific, developmental, evolutionary, and clinical sources - we suggest that somaticity (H1) has the adaptive function to modulate our tendency to comply and affiliate with a reference group but also (H2) increases the vulnerability to developing Social Anxiety (SA) and Eating Disorders (EDs). We evaluate H1-H2, (1) indicating the evolutionary role of somaticity in modulating our affiliation tendency to optimize the ancestral threat-opportunity balance coming from infectious diseases and (2) showing the deep connection between SA-EDs and the features most closely related to somaticity - interoception and parenting style. Finally, we discuss three relevant implications of H1-H2: (A) Bringing into research focus the adaptive role of our firmware knowledge system versus the hardware (neural substrate) and software (higher cognition) ones. (B) Complementing the well-grounded Objectification and Allocentric Lock Theories, allowing us to integrate multiple levels of explanation on the etiology of psychopathology. (C) Suggesting the design of new psychological treatments. While not aiming to prove H1-H2, our analysis supports them and encourages their direct testing.