1
|
Del Duca F, Manetti AC, Maiese A, Napoletano G, Ghamlouch A, Pascale N, Giorgio B, Paola F, Russa RL. Death Due to Anaphylactic Reaction: The Role of the Forensic Pathologist in an Accurate Postmortem Diagnosis. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:2184. [PMID: 38138287 PMCID: PMC10744436 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59122184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The diagnosis of anaphylaxis comprehensively depends on both situational information and laboratory investigations. For this purpose, serum tryptase concentration is examined as an indicator of systemic mast cell mediator release, linked to an underlying anaphylactic process. Increased levels of tryptase may occur in some events different from anaphylaxis, but usually information from crime scene investigations is lacking and autoptic findings are not specific. For legal reasons, it is required to achieve a definite diagnosis of mast cell degranulation that can lead to a certain diagnosis of death from anaphylaxis. Immunohistochemistry seems to be a relatively simple, reliable, and easily repeatable method that can assist the forensic pathologist in the differential diagnosis of death from anaphylaxis. Materials and Methods: This work provides an overview of the current literature on immunohistochemical methods useful in the determination process of anaphylactic-related deaths. A systematic search, according to the PRISMA statement, was performed in databases to identify studies investigating immunohistochemical targets related to anaphylaxis death. Results: This work underscores the importance of anaphylaxis mediators such as tryptase, CD117, and chymase in the immunohistochemical analysis of anaphylactic deaths. Conclusions: According to the reviewed literature, the diagnosis of death due to anaphylaxis should depend not just on the suspicion of an anaphylactic reaction but also on confirming mast cell degranulation through the identification of IHC positivity for inflammatory mediators, particularly in the respiratory tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Del Duca
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Alice Chiara Manetti
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Aniello Maiese
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Medical, Molecular and Critical Area, Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Gabriele Napoletano
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Alessandro Ghamlouch
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Natascha Pascale
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Hospital ‘San Carlo’, 85100 Potenza, Italy;
| | - Bolino Giorgio
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Frati Paola
- Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena 336, 00161 Rome, Italy; (F.D.D.); (A.C.M.); (G.N.); (A.G.); (B.G.); (F.P.)
| | - Raffaele La Russa
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Public Health, Life Sciences, and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chang J, Tasellari A, Wagner JL, Scheetz MH. Contemporary pharmacologic treatments of MRSA for hospitalized adults: rationale for vancomycin versus non-vancomycin therapies as first line agents. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2023; 21:1309-1325. [PMID: 37876291 DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2023.2275663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important pathogen in the hospital setting and causes significant morbidity and mortality each year. Since the initial discovery over 60 years ago, vancomycin has remained a first-line treatment for many different types of MRSA infections. However, significant concerns related to target attainment and nephrotoxicity have spurred efforts to develop more effective agents in the last two decades. AREAS COVERED Newer anti-MRSA antibiotics that have been approved since 2000 include linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline. As clinical evidence has accumulated, these newer agents have become more frequently used, and some are now recommended as co-first-line options (along with vancomycin) in clinical practice guidelines. For this review, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to support our findings and recommendations. EXPERT OPINION Vancomycin remains an important standard of care for MRSA infections but is limited with respect to nephrotoxicity and rapid target attainment. Newer agents such as linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline have specific indications for treating different types of MRSA infections; however, newer agents also have unique attributes which require consideration during therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Chang
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA
- Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ardita Tasellari
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | - Jamie L Wagner
- School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - Marc H Scheetz
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA
- Pharmacometrics Center of Excellence, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove, IL, USA
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Adema JL, Ahiskali A, Fida M, Mediwala Hornback K, Stevens RW, Rivera CG. Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis. Pathogens 2023; 12:703. [PMID: 37242373 PMCID: PMC10223386 DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12050703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals' experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L. Adema
- Department of Pharmacy, East Carolina University Health, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Aileen Ahiskali
- Department of Pharmacy, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN 55415, USA
| | - Madiha Fida
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Krutika Mediwala Hornback
- Department of Pharmacy, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) Health, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Ryan W. Stevens
- Department of Pharmacy, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Marietti R, Bianchi L, Hansel K, Casciola G, Biondi F, Tramontana M, Stingeni L. Multiple allergy to cephalosporins confirmed by patch test: From the first to the fifth generation. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 88:487-490. [PMID: 36855909 DOI: 10.1111/cod.14301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rossella Marietti
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Leonardo Bianchi
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Katharina Hansel
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Gabriele Casciola
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Biondi
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marta Tramontana
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Luca Stingeni
- Dermatology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abate G, Wang G, Frisby J. Ceftaroline: Systematic Review of Clinical Uses and Emerging Drug Resistance. Ann Pharmacother 2022; 56:1339-1348. [PMID: 35300514 DOI: 10.1177/10600280221082326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the success rates of off-label uses of ceftaroline for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and evaluate emerging ceftaroline resistance. DATA SOURCES We queried PubMed/MEDLINE, with the search term "Ceftaroline." Articles were restricted to the English language and year of publication (January 1, 2009-January 31, 2022). STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION Clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports that reported efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, use in MRSA infections other than acute bacterial skin infection and community-acquired pneumonia, and ceftaroline resistance were selected. DATA SYNTHESIS The search pooled 103 publications and all abstracts were reviewed. Forty-six articles that reported efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, or off-label use in multiple patients and 7 articles on ceftaroline resistance are used in this review. Ceftaroline has been approved for treatment of acute skin/soft tissue infection and community-acquired pneumonia. Ceftaroline's efficacy in off-label infections ranged from 66.7% to 87.3% depending on the types of infection. There were 14 documented cases of ceftaroline resistance associated with PBP2a changes. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE Case series and observational studies have documented success with ceftaroline alone or in combination with vancomycin or daptomycin for treatment of MRSA bone and joint, endovascular, diabetic foot infections, and bacteremia from other causes. CONCLUSION Despite the lack of randomized controlled trials, ceftaroline is used as salvage therapy for different MRSA infections. The data from case series and observational studies are promising but ceftaroline should be used judiciously as ceftaroline-resistant MRSA begin to emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Getahun Abate
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Grace Wang
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jared Frisby
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mahjabeen F, Saha U, Mostafa MN, Siddique F, Ahsan E, Fathma S, Tasnim A, Rahman T, Faruq R, Sakibuzzaman M, Dilnaz F, Ashraf A. An Update on Treatment Options for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Bacteremia: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2022; 14:e31486. [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
7
|
Guan S, Yu H, Xiang H, Wang L, Liu J, Wu A, Zheng J, Dong H, Wang L, Wang D. WYBQ-4: a New Bactericidal Agent against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0054722. [PMID: 36098533 PMCID: PMC9603521 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00547-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a multidrug-resistant pathogen that currently poses a serious threat to global health. Novel antimicrobial agents against MRSA are urgently being developed. In this study, we investigated WYBQ-4, which is an effective antibacterial agent with potent bactericidal activity and bactericidal efficiency against MRSA USA300 and clinical isolate strains. In addition, WYBQ-4 exhibited low cytotoxicity without hemolytic activity according to a safety evaluation. Importantly, WYBQ-4 showed potent in vivo efficacy in an MRSA-induced mouse pneumonia model, systemic infection model, and intramuscular infection model. The efficacy of this new cephalosporin against MRSA was associated with a high affinity for penicillin-binding proteins (PBP1, PBP2, PBP3, PBP4, PBP2a) evaluated in a competition assay using bocillin as a reporter. In conclusion, WYBQ-4 has a significant bactericidal effect in vitro and in vivo, indicating that it is a promising compound to control MRSA infection. IMPORTANCE Antibiotic resistance is spreading faster than the introduction of new compounds into clinical practice, causing a public health crisis. Novel antimicrobial agents against MRSA are urgently being developed. In this study, we investigated WYBQ-4, which is an effective antibacterial agent with potent bacteriostatic activity and bactericidal efficiency against MRSA USA300 and clinical isolate strains. WYBQ-4 showed potent in vivo efficacy in MRSA-induced mouse models. Subsequently, we further revealed its antibacterial mechanism. In conclusion, WYBQ-4 has a significant bactericidal effect in vitro and in vivo, indicating that it is a promising compound to control MRSA infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuhan Guan
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- State Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, and College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hangqian Yu
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hua Xiang
- College of Animal Medicine, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China
| | - Li Wang
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
- Changchun University of Chinese Medicine, Changchun, China
| | - Jingyu Liu
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Anfang Wu
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Jianze Zheng
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Hongbo Dong
- School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lin Wang
- State Key Laboratory for Zoonotic Diseases, Key Laboratory for Zoonosis Research of the Ministry of Education, Institute of Zoonosis, and College of Veterinary Medicine, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Dacheng Wang
- College of Animal Science, Jilin University, Changchun, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bassir F, Varghese S, Wang L, Chin YP, Zhou L. The Use of Electronic Health Records to Study Drug-Induced Hypersensitivity Reactions from 2000 to 2021. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2022; 42:453-497. [PMID: 35469629 PMCID: PMC9267416 DOI: 10.1016/j.iac.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Electronic health records (EHRs) have revolutionized the field of drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR) research. In this systematic review, we assessed 140 articles from 2000-2021, classifying them under six themes: observational studies (n=61), clinical documentation (n=27), case management (n=22), clinical decision support (CDS) (n=18), case identification (n=9), and genetic studies (n=3). EHRs provide convenient access to millions of medical records, facilitating epidemiological studies of DHRs. Though the goal of CDS is to promote safe drug prescribing, allergy alerts must be designed and used in a way that supports this effort. Ultimately, accurate allergy documentation is essential for DHR prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Bassir
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA; Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA.
| | - Sheril Varghese
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| | - Liqin Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| | - Yen Po Chin
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| | - Li Zhou
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 399 Revolution Drive, Suite 1315, Somerville, MA 02145, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blumenthal KG, Wolfson AR, Li Y, Seguin CM, Phadke NA, Banerji A, Mort E. Allergic Reactions Captured by Voluntary Reporting. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e1595-e1604. [PMID: 30720546 PMCID: PMC6669104 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The epidemiology of hospital adverse reactions (ARs), particularly allergic reactions, or hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), is poorly defined. To determine priorities for allergy safety in healthcare, we identified and described safety reports of allergic reactions. METHODS We searched the safety report database of a large academic medical center from April 2006 to March 2016 using 101 complete, truncated, and/or misspelled key words related to allergic symptoms, treatments, and culprits (e.g., medications, foods). Patient and event data were summarized for ARs and two types of ARs, HSRs and side effects/toxicities. RESULTS Among 9111 key word search-identified events, 876 (10%) were ARs, of which 436 (5%) were HSRs and the remaining 440 (5%) were side effect reactions or toxicities. Whereas the most common HSRs were simple cutaneous reactions (83%), the following severe immediate HSRs were also identified: shortness of breath (16%), anaphylaxis (14%), and angioedema (12%). Most HSRs were caused by drugs (81%), with antibiotics (26%), particularly β-lactams (11%), and vancomycin (8%), commonly implicated. Other causes of drug HSRs included contrast agents (24%), chemotherapeutics (7%), and opioids (6%). Nondrug HSRs were from blood products (8%), latex (3%), and devices (3%). Food reactions were rarely identified (1%). CONCLUSIONS We identified ARs, HSRs, and side effects/toxicities, contained in a decade of safety reports at an academic medical center. Allergy safety in the healthcare setting should target approaches to common and severe reactions, with a focus on the safe administration of β-lactams, vancomycin, contrast agents, chemotherapeutics, and opioids. Priority nondrug HSR culprits include blood products, latex, and devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly G. Blumenthal
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Edward P. Lawrence Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Massachusetts General Professional Organization, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anna R. Wolfson
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yu Li
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Claire M. Seguin
- Edward P. Lawrence Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Massachusetts General Professional Organization, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Neelam A Phadke
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aleena Banerji
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Mort
- Edward P. Lawrence Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital and the Massachusetts General Professional Organization, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Ceftaroline fosamil is a novel 5th generation broad-spectrum oxyimino-cephalosporin with activity against Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Gram-negative bacteria. It has been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. There have been reported cases of successful treatment of MRSA bacteremia with this agent. Common adverse drug reactions from ceftaroline include skin rash, hives, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia is a rare untoward drug reaction associated with it. We report a case of fever and acute hypoxic respiratory failure with bilateral interstitial pulmonary infiltrates while on ceftaroline therapy for sternal osteomyelitis and ascending aortic graft infection secondary to MRSA. Laboratory studies revealed peripheral blood eosinophilia (>3000 cells/mm3). After exclusion of infectious, autoimmune, and other extrinsic allergic causes of pneumonia, ceftaroline-related acute eosinophilic pneumonia was suspected. Ceftaroline was discontinued and a therapeutic trial of high-dose steroid was initiated. Significant improvement of clinical symptoms and hypoxia was achieved after 24 h of steroid therapy. There was no recurrence of clinical symptoms after completing steroid course, which supported our suspicion of acute eosinophilic pneumonia from ceftaroline. Radiographic improvement of pulmonary infiltrates occurred 4 weeks later with complete resolution at 3 months from the initial event. The current case adds to this rarely reported adverse effect from this relatively newer antimicrobial agent. Increased awareness, early recognition, discontinuation of medication, and steroid therapy are key in favorable clinical outcome and recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaw Min
- Division of Infectious Disease, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rawiya Elrufay
- Division of Infectious Disease, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christian Y Cho
- Department of Pharmacy, Adventist Health Bakersfield, Bakersfield, California, USA
| | - Subbarao Elapavaluru
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nitin Bhanot
- Division of Infectious Disease, Allegheny General Hospital, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Robben PM, Ayalew MD, Chung KK, Ressner RA. Multi-Drug-Resistant Organisms in Burn Infections. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2020; 22:103-112. [PMID: 32429798 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2020.129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Infection is the most frequent complication after severe burns and remains the predominant cause of death. Burn patients may require multiple courses of antibiotics, lengthy hospitalizations, and invasive procedures that place burn patients at especially high risk for infections with multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs). Methods: The published literature on MDROs in burn patients was reviewed to develop a strategy for managing these infections. Results: Within a burn unit meticulous infection prevention and control measures and effective antimicrobial stewardship can limit MDRO propagation and decrease the antibiotic pressure driving the selection of MDROs from less resistant strains. Several new antimicrobial agents have been developed offering potential therapeutic options, but familiarity with their benefits and limitations is required for safe utilization. Successful management of MDRO burn infections is supported by a multifactorial approach. Novel non-antibiotic therapeutics may help combat MDRO infections and outbreaks. Conclusions: Multi-drug-resistant organisms are being identified with increasing frequency in burn patients. Effective sensitivity testing is essential to identify MDROs and to direct appropriate antibiotic choices for patient treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M Robben
- Infectious Diseases Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Memar D Ayalew
- Infectious Diseases Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Kevin K Chung
- The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Roseanne A Ressner
- Infectious Diseases Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.,The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alvarez AS, Oyerinde O, Reinert JP. Drug-Induced Kidney Disease Associated With Selected Antibiotics. Sr Care Pharm 2020; 35:225-229. [PMID: 32340659 DOI: 10.4140/tcp.n.2020.225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Structural and functional degeneration of the kidneys occur as the human body ages, making oler people especially susceptible to the consequences of acute kidney injury. Furthermore, the use of nephrotoxic agents, combined with the increased incidence of acute kidney injury and likelihood of an intensive-care unit admission, makes geriatric patients prone to develop drug-induced kidney disease. Vancomycin is routinely used as the first-line treatment for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, but is known to be nephrotoxic; studies have shown that an early switch from vancomycin to alternatives does not necessarily prevent renal insult. Therefore, we aim to discuss the mechanisms of drug-induced kidney disease with regard to vancomycin, daptomycin, and ceftaroline and to provide insight as to their safety profiles with regard to older people. A clear understanding of this topic will aid clinicians in selecting drug therapy and may lead to shortened hospital stays, lower hospital costs, and improved outcomes of critically ill older people.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bassetti M, Carnelutti A, Castaldo N, Peghin M. Important new therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:2317-2334. [PMID: 31622115 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1675637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections represent a leading cause of infection-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. There has been a welcome increase in the number of agents available for the treatment of MRSA infection over the last decade and several clinical trials are currently investigating the role of new experimental strategies.Areas covered: The purpose of this manuscript is to review the efficacy and safety of recently approved anti-MRSA molecules as well as some newer agents currently under investigation with a specific focus on the potential role of these drugs in everyday clinical practice.Expert opinion: Many new drugs with an activity against MRSA have been recently approved or are in an advanced stage of development. All these compounds represent promising options to enhance our antibiotic armamentarium. However, data regarding the use of these new compounds in real-life terms are limited and their best placement in therapy and in terms of optimization of medical resources and balance of cost-effectiveness requires further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- Department of Health Sciences, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Genoa and Hospital Policlinico San Martino-IRCCS, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessia Carnelutti
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Nadia Castaldo
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Maddalena Peghin
- Department of Medicine, Infectious Disease Clinic, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jansen JW, Linneman TW, Tan X, Moenster RP. Comparison of Adverse Drug Reactions Between Patients Treated With Ceftaroline or Ceftriaxone: A Single-Center, Matched Cohort Study. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6:ofz279. [DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Little information is available on the relative tolerability of ceftaroline versus other cephalosporins in clinical practice. We sought to compare adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with ceftaroline with those associated with ceftriaxone in hospitalized patients.
Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective, single-center matched cohort (according to age, indication, and duration) study of patients treated with ceftaroline or ceftriaxone at the VA St Louis Health Care System between 29 October 2010 and 28 March 2017, to compare rates of ADRs between the agents. Patients included received ≥2 doses of either medication to treat osteomyelitis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection, blood stream infection, pneumonia, infective endocarditis, septic arthritis, prosthetic joint infection, or empyema. The primary and secondary outcomes were the composite of any ADR during therapy and any ADR leading to premature discontinuation of therapy. The ADRs evaluated included rash, neutropenia, acute kidney injury, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, transaminitis, and hyperbilirubinemia.
Results
After matching, 50 patients per group were included and analyzed. An ADR occurred in 20% (10 of 50) of patients treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) of those treated with ceftaroline (P = .60). Two percent (1 of 50) of those treated with ceftriaxone and 16% (8 of 50) treated with ceftaroline had therapy discontinued owing to an ADR (P = .03). The most common ADR was eosinophilia (3 of 50) in the ceftriaxone group and rash (5 of 50) in the ceftaroline group. Ceftaroline therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for an ADR requiring premature discontinuation (odds ratio, 10.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.19–87.8; P = .03).
Conclusions
Although there was no difference in the rates of ADRs between patients in the ceftriaxone and ceftaroline groups, significantly more ceftaroline-treated patients required premature discontinuation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey W Jansen
- Pharmacy Department, SCL Health Saint Vincent Healthcare, Billings, Montana
| | - Travis W Linneman
- Pharmacy Service, VA St Louis Health Care System, Missouri
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy, Missouri
| | - Xing Tan
- College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago
| | - Ryan P Moenster
- Pharmacy Service, VA St Louis Health Care System, Missouri
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, St Louis College of Pharmacy, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bassetti M, Peghin M, Castaldo N, Giacobbe DR. The safety of treatment options for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2019; 18:635-650. [PMID: 31106600 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1621288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSI) may develop in both in-patients and out-patients, possibly with a severe clinical presentation. Since most phase 3 randomized clinical trials have shown non-inferiority in efficacy across different agents, considerations regarding their different safety profiles inevitably play a crucial role in the everyday choice about which of them should be employed for the treatment of ABSSSI. AREAS COVERED In this review, the authors discuss the safety profile of different treatment options for ABSSSI. EXPERT OPINION The spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the last decades has inevitably influenced the therapeutic approach to ABSSSI. Adequate knowledge of the peculiar toxicity profile of each drug active against MRSA is essential for guiding, monitoring and managing adverse events, in turn reducing any unfavorable impact of toxicity on patients' outcomes. In the next five years, potential toxicity will play a critical role in establishing the best available therapy for each specific patient, together with consideration regarding the possibility of avoiding hospitalization or allowing a switch from intravenous to oral therapy and early discharge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Bassetti
- a Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine , Udine , Italy.,b Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| | - Maddalena Peghin
- a Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine , Udine , Italy
| | - Nadia Castaldo
- a Infectious Diseases Clinic, Department of Medicine, University of Udine and Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine , Udine , Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blanca-Lopez N, Jimenez-Rodriguez TW, Somoza ML, Gomez E, Al-Ahmad M, Perez-Sala D, Blanca M. Allergic reactions to penicillins and cephalosporins: diagnosis, assessment of cross-reactivity and management. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:707-721. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2019.1619548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria L. Somoza
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Gomez
- Roche Innovation Center Basel, F Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Dolores Perez-Sala
- Department of Structural and Chemical Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Blanca
- Allergy Service, Infanta Leonor University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sullivan EL, Turner RB, O'Neal HR, Crum-Cianflone NF. Ceftaroline-Associated Neutropenia: Case Series and Literature Review of Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6:ofz168. [PMID: 31123688 PMCID: PMC6524829 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofz168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Ceftaroline is increasingly prescribed for "off-label" indications involving longer durations and higher doses. There have been postmarketing case reports of neutropenia among patients who have received extended durations of ceftaroline, but limited published data currently exist on its incidence and risk factors. We review a total of 37 published cases of ceftaroline-associated neutropenia including cases (n = 4) identified in our health care system. The median time from ceftaroline initiation to development of neutropenia (range) was 25 (8-125) days, with a median duration of neutropenia (range) of 4 (1-16) days. Agranulocytosis (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] nadir < 100 cells/mm3) developed in 49% of cases (n = 18), and there was an ANC nadir of 0 in 27% (n = 10). The overall incidence of neutropenia among cases receiving ceftaroline for ≥7-14 days (range) was 12% (7%-18% per individual study), higher than for comparator antibiotics in the literature. Risk factors for ceftaroline-associated neutropenia varied among studies and remain poorly defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva L Sullivan
- Pharmacy Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
| | - R Brigg Turner
- School of Pharmacy, Pacific University, Hillsboro, Oregon
| | - Hollis R O'Neal
- Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Louisiana State University Health/Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
| | - Nancy F Crum-Cianflone
- Internal Medicine Department, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California.,Infectious Disease Division, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Khan DA, Banerji A, Bernstein JA, Bilgicer B, Blumenthal K, Castells M, Ein D, Lang DM, Phillips E. Cephalosporin Allergy: Current Understanding and Future Challenges. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:2105-2114. [PMID: 31495420 PMCID: PMC6955146 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 06/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Cephalosporins are commonly used antibiotics both in hospitalized patients and in outpatients. Hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins are becoming increasingly common with a wide range of immunopathologic mechanisms. Cephalosporins are one of the leading causes for perioperative anaphylaxis and severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Patients allergic to cephalosporins tend to tolerate cephalosporins with disparate R1 side chains but may react to other beta-lactams with common R1 side chains. Skin testing for cephalosporins has not been well validated but appears to have a good negative predictive value for cephalosporins with disparate R1 side chains. In vitro tests including basophil activation tests have lower sensitivity when compared with skin testing. Rapid drug desensitization procedures are safe and effective and have been used successfully for immediate and some nonimmediate cephalosporin reactions. Many gaps in knowledge still exist regarding cephalosporin hypersensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David A. Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390-8859
| | - Aleena Banerji
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cox 201, MGH, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Jonathan A. Bernstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, ML#563, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0563
| | - Basar Bilgicer
- Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering, 205 McCourtney Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556-5637
| | - Kimberly Blumenthal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy & Immunology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Cox 201, MGH, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Mariana Castells
- Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 60 Fenwood Rd Hale Building, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Daniel Ein
- Department of Internal Medicine, George Washington University Medical Center, 2300 M St. NW, Washington DC 20037
| | - David M. Lang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Respiratory Institute, Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 9500 Euclid Ave-A90, Cleveland, OH 44195
| | - Elizabeth Phillips
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1161-21 St Ave S, A-2200 MCN, Nashville, TN 3732-2582
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jilani TN, Masood SO. Ceftaroline Fosamil as an Alternative for a Severe Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection: A Case Report. Cureus 2018; 10:e3776. [PMID: 30820395 PMCID: PMC6389029 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.3776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Bacteremia secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a dreaded medical condition that is not only associated with a significant medical cost but also carries high morbidity and mortality. The poor clinical outcomes seen in MRSA patients and the nephrotoxic effects of high-doses of vancomycin are challenging its current status as the first-line treatment for MRSA. Fortunately, vancomycin-intermediate-staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and vancomycin-resistant-staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) are not common in the United States. However, MRSA still presents different treatment challenges. Elevated vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) commonly result in decreased efficacy and an increased probability of treatment failure, prompting the use of alternative agents. Although daptomycin is an alternative, adverse effects (i.e., elevations in serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK), drug-induced myopathy, peripheral neuropathy, and eosinophilic pneumonia) may limit its use in some patients. In the search for a suitable replacement for vancomycin, great promise has been shown by anti-MRSA cephalosporins. We present a case of MRSA bacteremia and endocarditis requiring a different approach to treatment as compared to traditional treatment with vancomycin alone. This case report describes the successful treatment of MRSA bacteremia with ceftaroline fosamil in a patient who responded poorly to conventional therapy, specifically vancomycin, due to an elevated MIC (2 µg/mL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Syed O Masood
- Infectious Diseases, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Iftikhar S, Sarwar MR, Saqib A, Sarfraz M. Causality and preventability assessment of adverse drug reactions and adverse drug events of antibiotics among hospitalized patients: A multicenter, cross-sectional study in Lahore, Pakistan. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0199456. [PMID: 29949616 PMCID: PMC6021047 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives Adverse drug events (ADEs) are the fifth leading cause of death and thus responsible for a large number of hospital admissions in all over the globe. This study was aimed to assess the antibiotics associated preventability of ADEs and causality of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) among hospitalized patients. Methods A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in four tertiary care public sector hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan. Study population consisted of hospitalized patients who were prescribed with one or more antibiotics. Data were collected between 1st January, 2017 and 31st June, 2017 from 1,249 patients (384 patients aged ≤ 18 years and 865 patients aged >18 years). Schumock and Thornton scale was used to assess the preventability of the ADEs. Medication errors (MEs) that caused preventable ADEs were assessed by MEs tracking form while Naranjo score was used to evaluate the causal relation of ADRs with the antibiotics. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.) and Microsoft Excel (MS Office, 2010) were used for data analysis. Results 2,686 antibiotics were prescribed to 1,249 patients. Among them, fluoroquinolones (11.8%), macrolides (11.6%) and cephalosporins (10.9%) were the most frequently prescribed antibiotics. The most affected organ system by antibiotics associated ADEs was gastrointestinal tract. A total of 486 ADEs were found. The preventability assessment revealed that most of the ADEs (58.4%) were preventable (43.6% of the ADEs were definitely preventable while 14.8% were probably preventable) and caused by MEs including wrong drug (40.1%) and monitoring errors (25.0%), during the stage of physician ordering (22.2%) and patient monitoring (21.1%). The errors were caused due to non-adherence of policies (38.4%) and lack of information about antibiotics (32%). Most of the non-preventable ADEs or ADRs among adults and children were “probable” (35.5%) and “possible” (35.8%), respectively. Logistic regression analysis revealed that ADEs were significantly less among females (OR = 0.047, 95%CI = 0.018–0.121, p-value = <0.001), patients aged 18–52 years (OR = 0.041, 95%CI = 0.013–0.130, p-value = <0.001), tuberculosis patients (OR = 0.304, 95%CI = 0.186–0.497, p-value = <0.001), patients with acute respiratory tract infections (OR = 0.004, 95%CI = 0.01−0.019, p-value = <0.001) and among the patients prescribed with 2 antibiotics per prescription (OR = 0.455, 95%CI = 0.319–0.650, p-value = <0.001). Conclusion According to preventability assessment most of the ADEs were definitely preventable and caused by MEs due to non-adherence of policies and lack of information about antibiotics. The causality assessment of non-preventable ADEs showed that most of the ADRs were probable and possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadia Iftikhar
- Akhtar Saeed College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Rehan Sarwar
- Akhtar Saeed College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
- * E-mail:
| | - Anum Saqib
- Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Sarfraz
- Department of Pharmacy, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur Bahawalpur, Punjab, Pakistan
- College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ortwine JK, Bhavan K. Morbidity, mortality, and management of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia in the USA: update on antibacterial choices and understanding. Hosp Pract (1995) 2018; 46:64-72. [PMID: 29400119 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2018.1435128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with significant healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality in the United States. Complications of MRSA bacteremia include infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and sepsis, all of which are difficult to treat. Time to effective therapy and antibacterial choice greatly affect patient outcomes. Vancomycin and daptomycin remain first-line therapies; however, reports of vancomycin-associated treatment failure and reduced daptomycin susceptibility highlight the need to define alternative strategies for MRSA bacteremia treatment. In addition, several patient- and pathogen-specific factors influence the outcomes of MRSA bacteremia. It is, therefore, critical to explore the interaction between host- and pathogen-specific factors and its effect on MRSA bacteremia pathogenesis and mortality. This review discusses the factors that drive the development of MRSA bacteremia and examines alternative treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica K Ortwine
- a Infectious Diseases/Antimicrobial Stewardship Clinical Pharmacist, Department of Pharmacy Services , Parkland Health and Hospital System , Dallas , TX , USA
| | - Kavita Bhavan
- b Department of Internal Medicine , University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center , Dallas , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jansen JW, Moenster RP. Rate and Incidence of Adverse Reactions Associated With Ceftaroline Exposure: Importance of Cutaneous Manifestations. Ann Pharmacother 2018; 52:235-239. [PMID: 28980484 DOI: 10.1177/1060028017735629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ceftaroline is a broad-spectrum, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-active β-lactam approved for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and community-acquired pneumonia. Because of its favorable spectrum and pharmacokinetics, ceftaroline is frequently utilized for infections such as osteomyelitis and endocarditis. Ceftaroline has been associated with neutropenia, but evaluation of other adverse events remains limited. OBJECTIVE To describe the rates and types of ceftaroline-associated adverse events and determine if patients' baseline allergies affect the rates of an adverse event. METHODS A single-center, retrospective, observational analysis was conducted of all patients who received ceftaroline between November 4, 2011, and March 28, 2017, at the VA Saint Louis Health Care System. The Naranjo algorithm was utilized as a standardized method to evaluate likelihood that the adverse events were caused by ceftaroline therapy. Ceftaroline dose, duration, indication, and baseline allergy information were collected for all patients. RESULTS There were 75 patients who received 78 courses of ceftaroline identified for inclusion. The most common indications were osteomyelitis (51.3%) and ABSSSI (16.7%). Overall, 13/75 (17.3%) patients developed an adverse event, and 10/75 (13.3%) required discontinuation of ceftaroline. Rash was the most common adverse reaction and occurred in 7/75 (9.3%) patients, followed by neutropenia in 3/75 (4.0%) patients. There were no differences in baseline allergy characteristics between patients who experienced an adverse reaction to ceftaroline and those who did not. CONCLUSIONS When compared with clinical trials, ceftaroline use appears to be associated with an increased rate of overall adverse events, which is driven by cutaneous reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey W Jansen
- 1 SCL Saint Vincent Healthcare, Billings, MT, USA
- 2 VA Saint Louis Health Care System, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan P Moenster
- 2 VA Saint Louis Health Care System, Saint Louis, MO, USA
- 3 Saint Louis College of Pharmacy, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are the most frequent infectious cause of referrals to emergency departments and hospital admissions in developed world, contributing to significant morbidity and healthcare expenditures. We sought to review recent literature covering epidemiology and management of SSTIs. RECENT FINDINGS Incidence trends of SSTIs were increasing worldwide with Staphylococcus aureus and streptococci predominating and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) posing additional challenges, because of high rates of treatment failure and relapse. Development of new antimicrobials was associated with an appraisal of regulatory definitions and endpoints. Prediction of clinical response can be very tricky, because of variable risk factors for recurrence or treatment failure, depending mostly on the host. Precise indications for new antimicrobials should be established; their integration into clinical practice algorithms may serve reduction of unnecessary admissions, overtreatment and total costs. SUMMARY New antimicrobials with activity against MRSA have been recently launched. Long-acting agents, mainly oritavancin and dalbavancin, provide the opportunity of single-dose treatment and early discharge. Further outpatient treatment options include new per os antibiotics such as oxazolidinones. Validated assessment tools are urgently needed to support decision-making toward rational resource utilization and delivery of optimal treatment.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tamma PD, Avdic E, Li DX, Dzintars K, Cosgrove SE. Association of Adverse Events With Antibiotic Use in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Intern Med 2017; 177:1308-1315. [PMID: 28604925 PMCID: PMC5710569 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 411] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Estimates of the incidence of overall antibiotic-associated adverse drug events (ADEs) in hospitalized patients are generally unavailable. OBJECTIVE To describe the incidence of antibiotic-associated ADEs for adult inpatients receiving systemic antibiotic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort of adult inpatients admitted to general medicine wards at an academic medical center. EXPOSURES At least 24 hours of any parenteral or oral antibiotic therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Medical records of 1488 patients were examined for 30 days after antibiotic initiation for the development of the following antibiotic-associated ADEs: gastrointestinal, dermatologic, musculoskeletal, hematologic, hepatobiliary, renal, cardiac, and neurologic; and 90 days for the development of Clostridium difficile infection or incident multidrug-resistant organism infection, based on adjudication by 2 infectious diseases trained clinicians. RESULTS In 1488 patients, the median age was 59 years (interquartile range, 49-69 years), and 758 (51%) participants were female. A total of 298 (20%) patients experienced at least 1 antibiotic-associated ADE. Furthermore, 56 (20%) non-clinically indicated antibiotic regimens were associated with an ADE, including 7 cases of C difficile infection. Every additional 10 days of antibiotic therapy conferred a 3% increased risk of an ADE. The most common ADEs were gastrointestinal, renal, and hematologic abnormalities, accounting for 78 (42%), 45 (24%), and 28 (15%) 30-day ADEs, respectively. Notable differences were identified between the incidence of ADEs associated with specific antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Although antibiotics may play a critical role when used appropriately, our findings underscore the importance of judicious antibiotic prescribing to reduce the harm that can result from antibiotic-associated ADEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranita D Tamma
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Edina Avdic
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David X Li
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kathryn Dzintars
- Department of Pharmacy, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara E Cosgrove
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cosimi RA, Beik N, Kubiak DW, Johnson JA. Ceftaroline for Severe Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections: A Systematic Review. Open Forum Infect Dis 2017; 4:ofx084. [PMID: 28702467 PMCID: PMC5499876 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofx084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2016] [Accepted: 04/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Ceftaroline is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia, including cases with concurrent bacteremia. Use for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has risen for a multitude of reasons. The aim of this article is to review the literature evaluating clinical outcomes and safety of ceftaroline prescribed for serious MRSA infections. We conducted a literature search in Ovid (Medline) and PubMed for reputable case reports, clinical trials, and reviews focusing on the use of ceftaroline for treatment of MRSA infections. Twenty-two manuscripts published between 2010 and 2016 met inclusion criteria. Mean clinical cure was 74% across 379 patients treated with ceftaroline for severe MRSA infections. Toxicities were infrequent. Ceftaroline treatment resulted in clinical and microbiologic cure for severe MRSA infections. Close monitoring of hematological parameters is necessary with prolonged courses of ceftaroline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nahal Beik
- Center for Drug Policy, Partners Healthcare
| | | | - Jennifer A Johnson
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; and.,Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Schatz M, Sicherer SH, Zeiger RS. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice - 2016 Year in Review. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2017; 5:218-236. [PMID: 28143692 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
As editors, we concluded that it would be helpful to our readers to write a Year in Review article that highlights the Review, Original, and Clinical Communication articles published in 2016 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice. We summarized articles on the topics of asthma, rhinitis/rhinosinusitis, food allergy, anaphylaxis, drug allergy, urticarial/angioedema, eosinophilic disorders, and immunodeficiency. Within each topic, epidemiologic findings are presented, relevant aspects of prevention are described, and diagnostic and therapeutic advances are enumerated. Diagnostic tools described include history, skin tests, and in vitro tests. Treatments discussed include behavioral therapy, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We hope this review will help you, our readers, consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of your patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schatz
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif.
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Robert S Zeiger
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Greenberger PA. Immune-Mediated and Adverse Drug Reactions During Treatment with the Fifth Generation Cephalosporin, Ceftaroline: Drug Allergy Matters. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2016; 4:747-8. [PMID: 27393783 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Greenberger
- Division of Allergy-Immunology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
| |
Collapse
|