1
|
Polesie S, Alsterholm M. A systematic review investigating the proportion of clinical images shared in prospective randomized controlled trials involving patients with atopic dermatitis and systemic pharmacotherapy. J DERMATOL TREAT 2024; 35:2338280. [PMID: 38569598 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2338280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
For individuals with atopic dermatitis (AD), interpreting scientific papers that present clinical outcomes including the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) and Investigators Global Assessment may be difficult. When compared to tabulated data and graphs, images from before and after treatment are often far more meaningful to these patients that ultimately will be candidates for the treatment. This systematic review focused on determining the frequency of clinical image sharing in AD research. Conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, the review concentrated on randomized controlled trials that investigated predefined and available systemic treatments for AD. The search was performed in the MEDLINE database for studies published from the inception until 21 December 2023. The review included 60 studies, encompassing 17,799 randomized patients. Across these studies, 16 images representing 6 patients were shared in the manuscripts, leading to a sharing rate of 0.3‰. The almost missing inclusion of patient images in clinical trial publications hinders patient understanding. Adding images to scientific manuscripts could significantly improve patients' comprehension of potential treatment outcomes. This review highlights the need for authors, the pharmaceutical industry, study sponsors, and publishers to enhance and promote patient information through increased use of visual data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sam Polesie
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mikael Alsterholm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Dermatology and Venereology Unit, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caron AGM, Bloem M, El Khattabi H, de Waal AC, van Huizen AM, Denswil NP, Gerbens LAA, Spuls PI. The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. J DERMATOL TREAT 2024; 35:2292962. [PMID: 38124505 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2292962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
Background:Methotrexate is an off-label therapy for atopic dermatitis. A lack of consensus on dosing regimens poses a risk of underdosing and ineffective treatment or overdosing and increased risk of side effects. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on dosing regimens.Materials and methods:A literature search was conducted, screening all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and guidelines published up to 6 July 2023, in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.Results:Five RCTs and 21 guidelines were included. RCTs compared methotrexate with other treatments rather than different methotrexate dosing regimens. The start and maintenance doses in RCTs varied between 7.5-15 mg/week and 14.5-25 mg/week, respectively. Despite varied dosing, all RCTs demonstrated efficacy in improving atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms. Guidelines exhibited substantial heterogeneity but predominantly proposed starting doses of 5-15 mg/week for adults and 10-15 mg/m2/week for children. Maintenance doses suggested were 7.5-25 mg/week for adults and 0.2-0.7 mg/kg/week for children. One guideline suggested a test dose and nearly half advised folic acid supplementation.Conclusion:This systematic review highlights the lack of methotrexate dosing guidelines for atopic dermatitis. It identifies commonly recommended and utilized dosing regimens, serving as a valuable resource for clinicians prescribing methotrexate off-label and providing input for an upcoming consensus study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk G M Caron
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manja Bloem
- Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hajar El Khattabi
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ayla C de Waal
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid M van Huizen
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nerissa P Denswil
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louise A A Gerbens
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Caron AGM, van Huizen AM, Musters AAH, Gerbens LAA, Middelkamp Hup MA, Flohr C, Irvine AD, Vestergaard C, Peris K, Brandling-Bennett HA, Drucker AM, Spuls PI. International consensus on methotrexate dosing for patients with atopic dermatitis: An eDelphi study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024. [PMID: 39087636 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/05/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the widespread off-label use of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), there is limited high-quality evidence on dosing regimens and existing guidelines do not provide clear recommendations regarding dosing strategies. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to achieve international consensus among AD experts to standardize the dosing regimen for MTX treatment in adults and children with AD. METHODS An electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022. Recruitment was conducted through dermatology societies and AD interest groups. Participation was open to dermatologists and dermatology residents experienced in treating AD patients with MTX. The study consisted of three online rounds. The first round was informed by a systematic review of relevant literature, and subsequent rounds were adjusted based on the results of the previous round. Participants voted on 19 proposals using a 9-point scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neither agree nor disagree, 7-9 agree). Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of participants agreed, and less than 15% disagreed. Proposals that did not reach consensus in the first three rounds were discussed in a consensus meeting, where consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement. RESULTS In total, 152 participants completed Round 1, 104 (68%) completed all survey rounds, and 43 (28%) joined the consensus meeting. Consensus was achieved on 7 proposals in Round 1, 4 in Round 2 and 6 in Round 3. The final 2 proposals reached consensus during the consensus meeting. Consensus topics include test dose, start dose, maximum dose, administration route, dosing schedule, management of stopping treatment, treatment duration and folic acid supplementation. CONCLUSIONS This eDelphi study achieved consensus on 19 proposals related to MTX dosing for adults and children with AD. These results aim to guide prescribing decisions and encourage a standardized global approach to MTX use in AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk G M Caron
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid M van Huizen
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelie A H Musters
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louise A A Gerbens
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maritza A Middelkamp Hup
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Department of Paediatric Dermatology, St John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alan D Irvine
- Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Ketty Peris
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Chirurgiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - IRCCSUOC di Dermatologia, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Medicina, Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreDermatologia, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Aaron M Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto and Women's College Hospital, and the Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Drucker AM, Lam M, Prieto-Merino D, Malek R, Ellis AG, Yiu ZZN, Rochwerg B, Di Giorgio S, Arents BWM, Mohan T, Burton T, Spuls PI, Schmitt J, Flohr C. Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update. JAMA Dermatol 2024:2821284. [PMID: 39018058 PMCID: PMC11255974 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
Importance There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments. Objective To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024. Main Outcome Measures Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI. Results The study sample included 98 eligible trials, with a total of 24 707 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons. Conclusions and Relevance In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine and Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Megan Lam
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Rayka Malek
- School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London
| | | | - Zenas Z. N. Yiu
- Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Dermatology Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sonya Di Giorgio
- Libraries & Collections, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Bernd W. M. Arents
- Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, the Netherlands
| | - Tanya Mohan
- Patient Representative (independent), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tim Burton
- Patient Representative (independent), Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Phyllis I. Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health/Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Paediatric & Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John’s Institute of Dermatology, King’s College London and Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mocanu M, Procopciuc D, Gheucă-Solovăstru DF, Popescu IA, Olinici DT, Pătrașcu AI, Vâță D, Gheucă-Solovăstru L. An Overview of Methotrexate Indications in Skin Diseases. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1024. [PMID: 39064453 PMCID: PMC11279115 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2024] [Revised: 06/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Methotrexate is an immunosuppressive drug with remarkable therapeutic results in the treatment of autoimmune and proliferative skin diseases. Although it has been more than half a century since it was first introduced into the therapeutic arsenal of dermatologists, there are currently no standardized therapeutic protocols regarding the prescription of methotrexate in dermatology, with the exception of psoriasis treatment. This review aims to highlight the indications and benefits of methotrexate beyond psoriasis, with a focus on a wide range of inflammatory, vesiculobullous, and proliferative dermatological pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mădălina Mocanu
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Dorina Procopciuc
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | | | - Ioana Adriana Popescu
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Doinița Temelie Olinici
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
- Faculty of Medicine, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania;
| | - Adriana Ionela Pătrașcu
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Dan Vâță
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| | - Laura Gheucă-Solovăstru
- Department of Dermatology, “Grigore T. Popa” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (I.A.P.); (L.G.-S.)
- Dermatology Clinic, “St. Spiridon” County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 700115 Iasi, Romania; (D.P.); (D.T.O.); (A.I.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aquino MR, Schmidlin K, Woodruff CM. Managing Contact Dermatitis Without Patch Testing. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024:S2213-2198(24)00432-X. [PMID: 38703819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.04.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common skin condition caused by contact with an exogenous agent that elicits an inflammatory response. Patch testing (PT) is considered the gold standard for diagnosing ACD. Unfortunately, PT may not be available to some patients due to insurance and financial limitations, contributing to health care disparity and leaving patients with undiagnosed, incompletely managed dermatitis that can have further detrimental health and occupational effects. For other patients, PT is precluded by lack of availability of specialist/expert care, comorbid medications, or diffuse disease. This article will present a patient with ACD and will work through the differential diagnosis and share strategies for empiric avoidance of suspected/common triggers. The epidemiology of ACD with respect to race and ethnicity, considerations for affordability of hypoallergenic products, access to testing, and the need for future research are addressed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcella R Aquino
- Division of Allergy & Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Rhode Island Hospital/Hasbro Children's Hospital, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
| | - Kristin Schmidlin
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, The University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fomina DS, Mukhina OA, Mikhailova VI, Lebedkina MS, Sedova EL, Bobrikova EN, Elisyutina OG, Fedenko ES, Nurpeisov TT, Karaulov AV, Lysenko MA, Ensina LFC. Treatment of atopic dermatitis with upadacitinib: adcare single center experience. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1385720. [PMID: 38695023 PMCID: PMC11061355 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385720] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The role of upadacitinib in the management of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis seems promising, but more data on its efficacy and safety are needed. This study endeavors to assess the practical impact and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. The study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, focusing on analyzing patient responses to the treatment. Methods In this study, adult patients diagnosed with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis received upadacitinib at daily doses of 15 mg or 30 mg, as prescribed by their attending physicians. The therapeutic efficacy of upadacitinib was meticulously assessed using established clinical metrics. Simultaneously, a comprehensive safety assessment was conducted through monthly monitoring, including the evaluation of potential effects of upadacitinib intake on hepatic function, lipid profile, and hematopoiesis using the pertinent laboratory tests. Results Sixteen participants were enrolled in the study. At 1month follow-up, there was a significant reduction in the mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score to 18.8 points, which further increased to 24 points at the 4-month mark. Additionally, 9 participants (56%) demonstrated an EASI-50 response after 1 month of treatment, with this response increasing to 9 participants (90%) after 4 months. Furthermore, enhanced therapeutic responses were observed at 4 months, with 6 patients (38%) achieving an EASI-75 response at 1month and 8 patients (80%) achieving this milestone at the 4-month follow-up. This study highlights the potential of upadacitinib as an effective treatment option for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. While it demonstrates improved symptom management, close monitoring for potential adverse events, particularly infections and the known risks of Janus kinase inhibitors, is essential. Further research is essential to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of upadacitinib.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daria S. Fomina
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga A. Mukhina
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Valeria I. Mikhailova
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina S. Lebedkina
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elizaveta L. Sedova
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Elena N. Bobrikova
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga G. Elisyutina
- NRC Institute of Immunology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russia
| | | | - Tair T. Nurpeisov
- Department of General Immunology, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University (KazNMU), Almaty, Kazakhstan
- Republican Allergy Center, Research Institute of Cardiology and Internal Medicine, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Alexander V. Karaulov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Mar’yana A. Lysenko
- City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, State Budgetary Healthcare Institution, Moscow, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Luis Felipe C. Ensina
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wang Q, Chen L. Methotrexate therapy for adult and paediatric moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of data from daily practice. Australas J Dermatol 2024; 65:114-127. [PMID: 37941136 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.14183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
Of the 15 eligible studies identified via electronic searches in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL in November 2022 for methotrexate therapy of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, 12 were non-randomized controlled trial (non-RCT) studies with data from 437 patients (235 adults and 202 children). The response rates for short-term therapy were 77% [95% CI 55-99] (four studies; adults) - comparable to 81% [54-100] of RCTs (two studies; adults) (p = 0.63) - and 61% [43-79] (two studies; children), and for medium/long-term therapy were 88.9% [74.3-100.0] (four studies; adults) and 77.7% [61.5-94.0] (three studies; children). Children had a markedly lower rate of treatment discontinuation due to side effects [2.0% (five studies; children) vs. 14.9% (six studies; adults)], but were more likely to experience gastrointestinal disorders {relative risk (RR) 2.0 [1.44-2.71]}, fatigue (RR 2.3 [1.35-3.72]), headache (RR 2.8 [1.23-5.61]), and infections (RR 2.9 [2.18-3.58]). Other adverse events (children vs. adults) included hepatic disorders (32/176 vs. 35/305) and blood and lymphatic system/bone marrow disorders (25/148 vs. 19/184). Four serious adverse events were reported (children). Evidence from daily practice was limited by bias in the selection of participants in the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaohong Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liheng Chen
- Department of Endocrinology, Fourth Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Yiwu, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Werfel T, Heratizadeh A, Aberer W, Augustin M, Biedermann T, Bauer A, Fölster-Holst R, Kahle J, Kinberger M, Nemat K, Neustädter I, Peters E, von Kiedrowski R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schmitt J, Schwennesen T, Simon D, Spindler T, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Werner RN, Wollenberg A, Worm M, Ott H. S3 guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 2 - Systemic treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:307-320. [PMID: 38161245 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
The present S3 guideline was created based on the European English-language S3 guideline, with special consideration given to the medical conditions in the German-speaking region, and with additions from the previous German-language version, in accordance with the criteria of the AWMF. This second part of the guideline addresses the systemic therapy of atopic dermatitis (AD). It covers topics such as the indication for systemic therapy in children, adolescents, and adult patients with AD. Furthermore, it addresses all medications approved for AD, such as the biologics dupilumab and tralokinumab, the Janus kinase inhibitors abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib, as well as conventional immunosuppressive therapies with systemic glucocorticosteroids and ciclosporin. Additionally, it discusses systemic off-label therapies. The first part of the guideline, published separately, includes the definition and diagnostic aspects of AD, describes topical therapy, non-drug therapy approaches, and addresses aspects related to special patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Werfel
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Annice Heratizadeh
- Department of Dermatology, Allergology and Venereology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Werner Aberer
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Matthias Augustin
- Competence Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology (CVderm), Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing (IVDP), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Regina Fölster-Holst
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Julia Kahle
- German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB), Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maria Kinberger
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Division of Evidence Based Medicine in Dermatology (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Katja Nemat
- Office for Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, Pediatric Center Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Kid), Dresden, Germany
| | - Irena Neustädter
- Hospital Hallerwiese, Cnopfsche Kinderklinik, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Eva Peters
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | | | | | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare (ZEGV), Medical Faculty Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Dagmar Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Spindler
- Specialized Clinic for Pediatric Pneumology and Allergology, Wangen, Germany
| | | | - Ricardo Niklas Werner
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Division of Evidence Based Medicine in Dermatology (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Hagen Ott
- Department of Pediatric Dermatology and Allergology, Children's and Adolescents' Hospital Auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Werfel T, Heratizadeh A, Aberer W, Augustin M, Biedermann T, Bauer A, Fölster-Holst R, Kahle J, Kinberger M, Nemat K, Neustädter I, Peters E, von Kiedrowski R, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schmitt J, Schwennesen T, Simon D, Spindler T, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Werner RN, Wollenberg A, Worm M, Ott H. S3-Leitlinie Atopische Dermatitis: Teil 2 - Systemische Therapie: S3 guideline Atopic dermatitis: Part 2 - Systemic treatment. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2024; 22:307-322. [PMID: 38361206 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.15229_g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
ZusammenfassungDie vorliegende S3‐Leitlinie wurde auf der Basis der europäischen englischsprachigen S3‐Leitlinie unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der medizinischen Gegebenheiten im deutschsprachigen Raum und mit Ergänzungen der deutschsprachigen Vorgängerversion, entsprechend den Kriterien der AWMF, erstellt. Dieser zweite Teil der Leitlinie behandelt die systemische Therapie der atopischen Dermatitis (AD). Eingegangen wird unter anderem auf die Indikationsstellung für eine Systemtherapie bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und erwachsenen Patienten mit AD. Darüber hinaus werden alle für die AD zugelassenen Medikamente wie die Biologika Dupilumab und Tralokinumab, die Januskinase‐Inhibitoren Abrocitinib, Baricitinib und Upadacitinib sowie die konventionellen immunsuppressiven Therapien mit systemischen Glukokortikosteroiden und Ciclosporin adressiert. Systemische Off‐Label‐Therapien werden ebenfalls behandelt. Der separat publizierte erste Teil der Leitlinie umfasst die Definition und diagnostischen Aspekte der AD, beschreibt die topische Therapie sowie nichtmedikamentöse Therapieverfahren und geht auf Aspekte bei besonderen Patientengruppen ein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Werfel
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Annice Heratizadeh
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Allergologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Werner Aberer
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Österreich
| | - Matthias Augustin
- Kompetenzzentrum Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie (CVderm), Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (IVDP), Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie am Biederstein, Technische Universität München, Deutschland
| | - Andrea Bauer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Regina Fölster-Holst
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Julia Kahle
- Deutscher Allergie- und Asthmabund (DAAB) e. V., Mönchengladbach, Deutschland
| | - Maria Kinberger
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Katja Nemat
- Praxis für Kinderpneumologie und Allergologie, Kinderzentrum Dresden-Friedrichstadt (Kid), Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Irena Neustädter
- Klinik Hallerwiese, Cnopfsche Kinderklinik, Nürnberg, Deutschland
| | - Eva Peters
- Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen (UKGM), Gießen, Deutschland
| | | | | | - Jochen Schmitt
- Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung (ZEGV), Medizinische Fakultät Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Deutschland
| | | | - Dagmar Simon
- Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Thomas Spindler
- Fachklinik für Pädiatrische Pneumologie und Allergologie, Wangen, Deutschland
| | | | - Ricardo Niklas Werner
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwigs-Maximilians-Universität, München, Deutschland
| | - Margitta Worm
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Hagen Ott
- Fachbereich Pädiatrische Dermatologie und Allergologie, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus Auf der Bult, Hannover, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Davis DMR, Drucker AM, Alikhan A, Bercovitch L, Cohen DE, Darr JM, Eichenfield LF, Frazer-Green L, Paller AS, Schwarzenberger K, Silverberg JI, Singh AM, Wu PA, Sidbury R. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis in adults with phototherapy and systemic therapies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2024; 90:e43-e56. [PMID: 37943240 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.08.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people with atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapies, treatment with phototherapy and systemic therapies can be considered. Multiple biologic therapies and Janus kinase (JAK)inhibitors have been approved since 2014 to treat AD. These guidelines update the 2014 recommendations for management of AD with phototherapy and systemic therapies. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD in adults. METHODS A multidisciplinary workgroup conducted a systematic review and applied the GRADE approach for assessing the certainty of evidence and formulating and grading recommendations. RESULTS The workgroup developed 11 recommendations on the management of AD in adults with phototherapy and systemic agents, including biologics, oral JAK inhibitors, and other immunomodulatory medications. LIMITATIONS Most randomized controlled trials of phototherapy and systemic therapies for AD are of short duration with subsequent extension studies, limiting comparative long-term efficacy and safety conclusions. CONCLUSIONS We make strong recommendations for the use of dupilumab, tralokinumab, abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib. We make conditional recommendations in favor of using phototherapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate, and against the use of systemic corticosteroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn M R Davis
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Aaron M Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ali Alikhan
- Department of Dermatology, Sutter Medical Foundation, Sacramento, California
| | - Lionel Bercovitch
- Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - David E Cohen
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York
| | - Jennifer M Darr
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Behavioral Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - Lawrence F Eichenfield
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, University of California San Diego and Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, California
| | | | - Amy S Paller
- Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Jonathan I Silverberg
- Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Anne Marie Singh
- Departments of Pediatrics, Dermatology and Medical Microbiology/Immunology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Peggy A Wu
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California
| | - Robert Sidbury
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chu AWL, Wong MM, Rayner DG, Guyatt GH, Díaz Martinez JP, Ceccacci R, Zhao IX, McMullen E, Srivastava A, Wang J, Wen A, Wang FC, Brignardello-Petersen R, Izcovich A, Oykhman P, Wheeler KE, Wang J, Spergel JM, Singh JA, Silverberg JI, Ong PY, O'Brien M, Martin SA, Lio PA, Lind ML, LeBovidge J, Kim E, Huynh J, Greenhawt M, Gardner DD, Frazier WT, Ellison K, Chen L, Capozza K, De Benedetto A, Boguniewicz M, Smith Begolka W, Asiniwasis RN, Schneider LC, Chu DK. Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 152:1470-1492. [PMID: 37678577 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin condition with multiple systemic treatments and uncertainty regarding their comparative impact on AD outcomes. OBJECTIVE We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD systemic treatments. METHODS For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and GREAT databases from inception to November 29, 2022, for randomized trials addressing systemic treatments and phototherapy for AD. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/e5sna). RESULTS The 149 included trials (28,686 patients with moderate-to-severe AD) evaluated 75 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, high-dose upadacitinib was among the most effective for 5 of 6 patient-important outcomes; high-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib were among the most effective for 2 outcomes. These Janus kinase inhibitors were among the most harmful in increasing adverse events. With high-certainty evidence, dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab were of intermediate effectiveness and among the safest, modestly increasing conjunctivitis. Low-dose baricitinib was among the least effective. Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, oral corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, phototherapy, and many novel agents are less certain. CONCLUSIONS Among individuals with moderate-to-severe AD, high-certainty evidence demonstrates that high-dose upadacitinib is among the most effective in addressing multiple patient-important outcomes, but also is among the most harmful. High-dose abrocitinib and low-dose upadacitinib are effective, but also among the most harmful. Dupilumab, lebrikizumab, and tralokinumab are of intermediate effectiveness and have favorable safety.
Collapse
Key Words
- Atopic dermatitis (eczema)
- Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (upadacitinib, abrocitinib, baricitinib), patient-important outcomes and adverse events or adverse reactions, disease severity, itch, sleep, itch and sleep disturbance quality of life
- network meta-analysis (comparative effectiveness, multiple treatment comparison)
- systemic treatments and phototherapy (light therapy, immunosuppressants, immunomodulators, DMARDs, cyclosporine, methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate, cortiosteroids, narrow-band UVB), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, tralokinumab, nemolizumab)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandro W L Chu
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Melanie M Wong
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Daniel G Rayner
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Gordon H Guyatt
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Juan Pablo Díaz Martinez
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Renata Ceccacci
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Irene X Zhao
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Eric McMullen
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Archita Srivastava
- Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Internal Medicine, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Jason Wang
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Aaron Wen
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Fang Chi Wang
- Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Canada
| | | | - Ariel Izcovich
- Servicio de Clínica Médica, Hospital Aleman, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Paul Oykhman
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Julie Wang
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Ala
| | - Jonathan I Silverberg
- Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC
| | - Peck Y Ong
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif; Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, Calif
| | | | | | - Peter A Lio
- Department of Dermatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill
| | - Mary Laura Lind
- School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz
| | - Jennifer LeBovidge
- Division of Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | | | - Joey Huynh
- Sepulveda VA Medical Center, North Hills, Calif
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo; Section of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colo
| | | | | | | | - Lina Chen
- Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Korey Capozza
- Global Parents for Eczema Research, Santa Barbara, Calif
| | - Anna De Benedetto
- Department of Dermatology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Mark Boguniewicz
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo; Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | | | - Rachel N Asiniwasis
- Department of Dermatology, University of Saskatchewan, Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | | | - Derek K Chu
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Evidence in Allergy Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prajapati S, Fardos M, Desai AD, Feldman SR. The role of lebrikizumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in the adult population. Immunotherapy 2023; 15:981-991. [PMID: 37401345 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2023-0066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Although there are many atopic dermatitis (AD) treatments, finding a long-term medication with minimal side effects can be difficult. This review characterizes lebrikizumab as AD treatment in adults. A literature search was conducted to examine lebrikizumab's role in treating moderate to severe AD. In a phase III trial, 74% of adults with AD treated with lebrikizumab 250 mg every 4 weeks achieved an Investigator Global Assessment of 0/1, 79% achieved Eczema Area and Severity Index 75 and 79% experienced improvements in pruritus numeric rating scale scores relative to placebo. Common adverse effects in the ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 trials were conjunctivitis (7 and 8%, respectively), nasopharyngitis (4 and 5%, respectively) and headache (3 and 5%, respectively). Results from clinical trials suggest that lebrikizumab may be a viable alternative for AD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuti Prajapati
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Mohammad Fardos
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Dermatology, HCA Florida Largo Hospital, Largo, FL, USA
| | - Amar D Desai
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bosma AL, Ouwerkerk W, Heidema MJ, Prieto-Merino D, Ardern-Jones MR, Beattie P, Brown SJ, Ingram JR, Irvine AD, Ogg G, Patel P, Reynolds NJ, Hearn RR, Wan M, Warren RB, Woolf RT, Hyseni AM, Gerbens LA, Spuls PI, Flohr C, Middelkamp-Hup MA. Comparison of real-world treatment outcomes of systemic immunomodulating therapy in atopic dermatitis patients with dark and light skin types. JAAD Int 2023; 10:14-24. [PMID: 36387062 PMCID: PMC9661502 DOI: 10.1016/j.jdin.2022.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few data exist on differences in treatment effectiveness and safety in atopic dermatitis patients of different skin types. Objective To investigate treatment outcomes of dupilumab, methotrexate, and ciclosporin, and morphological phenotypes in atopic dermatitis patients, stratified by Fitzpatrick skin type. Methods In an observational prospective cohort study, pooling data from the Dutch TREAT (TREatment of ATopic eczema) NL (treatregister.nl) and UK-Irish A-STAR (Atopic eczema Systemic TherApy Register; astar-register.org) registries, data on morphological phenotypes and treatment outcomes were investigated. Results A total of 235 patients were included (light skin types [LST]: Fitzpatrick skin type 1-3, n = 156 [Ethnicity, White: 94.2%]; dark skin types [DST]: skin type 4-6, n = 68 [Black African/Afro-Caribbean: 25%, South-Asian: 26.5%, and Hispanics: 0%]). DST were younger (19.5 vs 29.0 years; P < .001), more often had follicular eczema (22.1% vs 2.6%; P < .001), higher baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores (20.1 vs 14.9; P = .009), less allergic contact dermatitis (30.9% vs 47.4%; P = .03), and less previous phototherapy use (39.7% vs 59.0%; P = .008). When comparing DST and LST corrected for covariates including baseline EASI, DST showed greater mean EASI reduction between baseline and 6 months with only dupilumab (16.7 vs 9.7; adjusted P = .032). No differences were found for adverse events for any treatments (P > .05). Limitations Unblinded, non-randomized. Conclusion Atopic dermatitis differs in several characteristics between LST and DST. Skin type may influence treatment effectiveness of dupilumab.
Collapse
Key Words
- AD, atopic dermatitis
- AE, adverse event
- DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index
- DST, Dark Skin Type(s)
- EASI, Eczema Area and Severity Index
- IQR, interquartile range
- LST, Light Skin Type(s)
- NRS, Numerical Rating Scale
- POEM, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure
- SD, Standard Deviation
- atopic dermatitis
- atopic eczema
- ciclosporin
- daily practice
- dupilumab
- effectiveness
- ethnicity
- methotrexate
- morphology
- race
- registry
- routine clinical care
- safety
- skin type
- systemic treatment
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela L. Bosma
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter Ouwerkerk
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- NHRIS, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Madeline J. Heidema
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David Prieto-Merino
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Michael R. Ardern-Jones
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Paula Beattie
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK
| | - Sara J. Brown
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John R. Ingram
- Department of Dermatology, Division of Infection & Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Alan D. Irvine
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Graham Ogg
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Prakash Patel
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Nick J. Reynolds
- Department of Dermatology, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, Royal Victoria Infirmary and NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - R.M. Ross Hearn
- Department of Dermatology & Photobiology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
| | - Mandy Wan
- Pharmacy Department, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Richard B. Warren
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomedical 17 Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Richard T. Woolf
- St John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ariënna M. Hyseni
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louise A.A. Gerbens
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Phyllis I. Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Maritza A. Middelkamp-Hup
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - TREAT NL registry and UK-Irish A-STAR Study Groups
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- NHRIS, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, UK
- Clinical Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Royal Hospital for Children NHS Trust, Glasgow, UK
- Centre for Genomic and Experimental Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Division of Infection & Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
- MRC Human Immunology Unit, MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Dermatology, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Medical School, Newcastle University, Royal Victoria Infirmary and NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Department of Dermatology & Photobiology, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, UK
- Pharmacy Department, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, NIHR Manchester Biomedical 17 Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- St John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kim K, Kim M, Rhee E, Lee MH, Yang HJ, Park S, Kim HS. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Cyclosporine Relative to Immunomodulatory Drugs Used in Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041390. [PMID: 36835928 PMCID: PMC9959975 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Cyclosporine A (CsA) is effective in treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize the effectiveness and safety of low-dose (<4 mg/kg) versus high-dose (≥4 mg/kg) CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents in patients with AD. Five randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis included 159 patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were randomized to receive low-dose CsA, and 165 patients randomized to receive high-dose CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents. We found that low-dose CsA was not inferior to high-dose CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents in reducing AD symptoms [standard mean difference (SMD) -1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.47; 3.23]. High-dose CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents showed a significantly lower incidence of adverse events [incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.72, 95% CI 0.56; 0.93], however, after sensitivity analysis, there was no difference between the two groups except for one study (IRR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54; 1.07). Regarding serious adverse events requiring discontinuation of treatment, we observed no significant differences between low-dose CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents (IRR 1.83, 95% CI 0.62; 5.41). Our study may justify the use of low-dose CsA rather than high-dose CsA and other systemic immunomodulatory agents in moderate-to-severe AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyunghoon Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Mina Kim
- Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
| | - EunHee Rhee
- SCH Biomedical Informatics Research Unit, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Hee Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Incheon Medical Center, Incheon 22532, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon-Jong Yang
- SCH Biomedical Informatics Research Unit, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
- Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
| | - Suyeon Park
- Department of Applied Statistics, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea
- Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul 04401, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence: (S.P.); (H.S.K.)
| | - Hwan Soo Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea
- Correspondence: (S.P.); (H.S.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Perche PO, Cook MK, Feldman SR. Abrocitinib: A New FDA-Approved Drug for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Pharmacother 2023; 57:86-98. [PMID: 35587593 DOI: 10.1177/10600280221096713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this article is to review abrocitinib, an oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1 inhibitor, for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). DATA SOURCES A literature search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was performed for articles from inception through end-March 2022 using the following search terms: atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib, PF-04965842, methotrexate, cyclosporine, dupilumab, ruxolitinib, and JAK-STAT pathway. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION English articles relating to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of abrocitinib, and other conventional systemic medications for AD, were included. DATA SYNTHESIS Across phase IIb and phase III clinical trials, abrocitinib was efficacious with an average of 47.5% patients on 200 mg abrocitinib and 32.0% on 100 mg abrocitinib achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of 0 or 1 at 12 weeks. In comparison with dupilumab 300 mg subcutaneously every other week, patients on abrocitinib 200 mg once daily had improved disease severity and itch response. The majority of adverse events were not severe and self-limited. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE Prior to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of abrocitinib, prednisone was the only FDA-approved oral medication for AD. Although biologics such as dupilumab have revolutionized care, some patients prefer oral medications. Compared with clinical trials of conventional AD treatments, abrocitinib appears more effective. CONCLUSIONS Abrocitinib is an efficacious oral JAK 1 inhibitor recently FDA-approved for patients ≥ 18 years old with moderate-to-severe AD who have not responded to systemic medications or when contraindicated otherwise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick O Perche
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Madison K Cook
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.,Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rodriguez-Le Roy Y, Ficheux AS, Misery L, Brenaut E. Efficacy of topical and systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis on pruritus: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1079323. [PMID: 36619624 PMCID: PMC9814490 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1079323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pruritus is a major and burdensome symptom in atopic dermatitis (AD). The number of systemic treatments available for AD has increased recently, enabling improved patient relief. Objective To evaluate the effect of AD treatments on pruritus. Methods A systematic literature review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate and compare the effects of treatment used in AD on pruritus. PubMed and Embase databases were searched to find articles published between January 1990 and December 2021. Topical and systemic treatments were studied in patients aged ≥10 years. Results Among the 448 articles identified, 56 studies were retained in the systematic review. A total of 15 studies evaluated topical treatments: topical corticosteroids (TCS; 2), calcineurin inhibitors (6), PDE4 inhibitors (3), and Jak inhibitors (4). A total of five studies were included in the meta- analysis. All treatments had a positive effect on pruritus, with a mean overall reduction of 3.32/10, 95% IC [2.32-4.33]. The greatest reduction was observed with halometasone (mean: 4.75), followed by tofacitinib 2% (mean: 4.38). A total of 41 studies evaluated systemic therapies: cyclosporine (6), phototherapy (5), azathioprine (2), dupilumab (9), anti-IL 13 (5), nemolizumab (3), Jak inhibitors (9), mepolizumab (1), and apremilast (1). A total of 17 studies were included in 2 meta-analyses according to the concomitant use or not of TCS. In the meta-analysis without TCS, the overall decrease was 3.07/10, 95% IC [2.58-3.56]. The molecules with the highest efficacy on pruritus were upadacitinib 30 mg (mean: 4.90) and nemolizumab (mean: 4.81). Discussion The therapeutic arsenal for AD has increased rapidly, and many molecules are under development. The primary endpoint of clinical trials is most often a score that assesses the severity of AD; however, the assessment of pruritus is also essential. The majority of molecules have a positive effect on pruritus, but the improvement varies between them. Efficacy on pruritus is not always correlated with efficacy on AD lesions; therefore, these two criteria are crucial to evaluate. The limitations of this study were the heterogeneity in the assessment of pruritus, the moment of the assessment, and the concomitant application of TCS or not for studies evaluating systemics. In the future, it would be useful to use standardized criteria for assessing pruritus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laurent Misery
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France,Université de Bretagne Occidentale, LIEN, Brest, France
| | - Emilie Brenaut
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France,Université de Bretagne Occidentale, LIEN, Brest, France,*Correspondence: Emilie Brenaut,
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Labib A, Yosipovitch G. An evaluation of abrocitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2022; 18:1107-1118. [PMID: 36173402 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2022.2126353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common itchy inflammatory skin condition that affects many individuals. For many years, the landscape of AD treatment remained unchanged; however, there has been developing therapies that directly target the underlying immunological mechanism of AD. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are small molecules that have shown anti-inflammatory and anti-itch effects in AD. Recently, abrocitinib, an oral JAK 1 inhibitor, was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for atopic dermatitis. AREAS COVERED By downregulating the immune cascade, abrocitinib has demonstrated the ability to curb symptoms of AD, including rapidly reducing pruritus in 2-3 days, and is safe and well-tolerated overall despite a low increased risk in infection. The data discussed was obtained from a comprehensive literature review utilizing PubMed. EXPERT OPINION Abrocitinib has strong efficacy, likely due to its broader mechanism of action provided by the inhibition of key regulatory molecule, JAK. Results have demonstrated that it is more efficacious at curbing symptoms of AD than dupilumab, the current treatment of choice for refractory, moderate-to-severe AD. While abrocitinib provides a great alternative treatment, particularly for non-responders and AD subtypes, it also demonstrates a stronger side effect profile that must be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelina Labib
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery and Miami Itch Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Gil Yosipovitch
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery and Miami Itch Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wollenberg A, Kinberger M, Arents B, Aszodi N, Avila Valle G, Barbarot S, Bieber T, Brough HA, Calzavara Pinton P, Christen-Zäch S, Deleuran M, Dittmann M, Dressler C, Fink-Wagner AH, Fosse N, Gáspár K, Gerbens L, Gieler U, Girolomoni G, Gregoriou S, Mortz CG, Nast A, Nygaard U, Redding M, Rehbinder EM, Ring J, Rossi M, Serra-Baldrich E, Simon D, Szalai ZZ, Szepietowski JC, Torrelo A, Werfel T, Flohr C. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:1409-1431. [PMID: 35980214 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for paediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Dermatology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - M Kinberger
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - B Arents
- European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients' Associations (EFA), Brussels, Belgium
| | - N Aszodi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - G Avila Valle
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology, CHU Nantes, UMR 1280 PhAN, INRAE, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - T Bieber
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - H A Brough
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London Children's Hospital, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Paediatric Allergy Group, Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - M Deleuran
- Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M Dittmann
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C Dressler
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A H Fink-Wagner
- Global Allergy and Airways Diseases Patient Platform GAAPP, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Fosse
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - K Gáspár
- Department of Dermatology of the University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - L Gerbens
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC (University Medical Centers), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - U Gieler
- Department of Dermatology, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - G Girolomoni
- Dermatology and Venereology Section, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - S Gregoriou
- Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - A Nast
- Division of Evidence-Based Medicine (dEBM), Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - U Nygaard
- Department of Dermato-Venerology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - M Redding
- Eczema Outreach Support (UK), Linlithgow, UK
| | - E M Rehbinder
- Dermatology Department, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - J Ring
- Department of Dermatology Allergology Biederstein, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Rossi
- Dermatology Unit, Spedali Civili Hospital Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - D Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Z Z Szalai
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit, Heim Pál National Children's Institute Budapest, Budapest, Hungary
| | - J C Szepietowski
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - A Torrelo
- Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| | - T Werfel
- Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - C Flohr
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London, London, UK.,Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Drucker AM, Morra DE, Prieto-Merino D, Ellis AG, Yiu ZZN, Rochwerg B, Di Giorgio S, Arents BWM, Burton T, Spuls PI, Schmitt J, Flohr C. Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Update of a Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2022; 158:523-532. [PMID: 35293977 PMCID: PMC8928094 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Question What is the association of systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores? Findings This systematic review with meta-analysis found that compared with dupilumab, abrocitinib, 200 mg daily, and upadacitinib, 30 mg daily, were associated with reductions in EASI scores; upadacitinib, 15 mg daily, was associated with similar reductions, and tralokinumab, 300 mg every other week, and baricitinib, 2 and 4 mg daily, were associated with fewer reductions. Meaning Compared with dupilumab, different doses of abrocitinib, baricitinib, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib were associated with reductions in EASI scores for patients with atopic dermatitis; the relative effect estimates reported herein may help clinicians and patients make informed treatment choices. Importance Systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis are being evaluated primarily in placebo-controlled trials; network meta-analysis can provide relative efficacy and safety estimates for treatments that have not been compared head to head. Objective To compare reported measures of efficacy and assessments of safety in clinical trials of systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data Sources The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, Global Resource of EczemA Trials database, and trial registries were searched through June 15, 2021. Study Selection Randomized clinical trials examining 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis were included after screening titles, abstracts, and papers in duplicate. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were abstracted in duplicate. Bayesian network meta-analyses and assessed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation certainty of evidence were performed. The updated analysis was completed from June to December 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures Outcomes include change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS). Results Since October 2019, 21 new studies were added, for a total of 60 trials with 16 579 patients. Up to 16 weeks of treatment in adults, abrocitinib, 200 mg daily (mean difference [MD], 2.2; 95% credible interval [CrI], 0.2-4.0; high certainty) and upadacitinib, 30 mg daily (MD, 2.7; 95% CrI, 0.6-4.7; high certainty) were associated with reduced EASI slightly more than dupilumab, 600 mg then 300 mg every 2 weeks. Abrocitinib, 100 mg daily (MD, −2.1; 95% CrI, −4.1 to −0.3; high certainty), baricitinib, 4 mg daily (MD, −3.2; 95% CrI, −5.7 to −0.8; high certainty), baricitinib, 2 mg daily (MD, −5.2; 95% CrI, −7.5 to −2.9; high certainty) and tralokinumab, 600 mg then 300 mg every 2 weeks (MD, −3.5; 95% CrI, −5.8 to −1.3; high certainty) were associated with reduced EASI slightly less than dupilumab. There was little or no difference between upadacitinib, 15 mg daily, and dupilumab (MD, 0.2; 95% CrI, −1.9 to 2.2; high certainty). The pattern of results was similar for POEM, DLQI, and PP-NRS. Conclusions and Relevance In this systematic review and meta-analysis, abrocitinib, 200 mg; and upadacitinib, 30 mg daily, were associated with slightly better scores than dupilumab, and upadacitinib, 15 mg daily, was associated with similar scores to dupilumab. Abrocitinib, 100 mg daily, baricitinib, 4 mg and 2 mg daily, and tralokinumab, 300 mg, every 2 weeks were associated with slightly worse scores.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Medicine and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Deanna E Morra
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Prieto-Merino
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Zenas Z N Yiu
- Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingodm
| | - Bram Rochwerg
- Departments of Medicine and Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sonya Di Giorgio
- Libraries & Collections, King's College London, London, United Kingodm
| | - Bernd W M Arents
- Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis (VMCE), Nijkerk, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Burton
- Patient Representative (independent), Nottingham, United Kingodm
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health/Infection and Immunology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität (TU) Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Roediger B, Schlapbach C. T cells in the skin: lymphoma and inflammatory skin disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:1172-1184. [PMID: 35247433 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
T cells are established contributors to the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis, yet whether they are the key drivers or simply unwitting participants remains incompletely understood. Conversely, malignant T cells are the undisputed culprits of cutaneous T cell lymphoma (CTCL), a group of diseases that share key clinical, histopathological and molecular features with inflammatory skin disease (ISD). Here, we compare the pathogenesis of ISD and CTCL and discuss the resulting insights. Recurrent, skin-limited disease implicates skin-resident T cells (TRM) in both ISD and CTCL. In CTCL, malignant T cells recruit benign T cells into inflammatory skin lesions, a disease-amplifying function also proposed for pathogenic T cells in ISD. Mechanistically, cytokines produced by malignant T cells in CTCL and by pathogenic T cells in ISD, respectively, are likely both necessary and sufficient to drive skin inflammation and pruritus, which in turn promotes skin barrier dysfunction and dysbiosis. Therapies for ISD target T cell effector functions but do not address the chronicity of disease while treatments for CTCL target malignant T cells but not primarily the symptoms of the disease. By integrating our understanding of ISD and CTCL, important insights into pathogenesis and therapy can be made which may improve the lives of sufferers of both disease groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Roediger
- Autoimmunity, Transplantation and Inflammation (ATI), Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Schlapbach
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee JH, Kim JE, Park GH, Bae JM, Byun JY, Shin MK, Han TY, Hong SP, Jang YH, Kim HO, Na CH, Lew BL, Ahn J, Park CO, Seo YJ, Lee YW, Son SW, Choi EH, Park YL, Roh JY. Consensus Update for Systemic Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis. Ann Dermatol 2021; 33:497-514. [PMID: 34858001 PMCID: PMC8577915 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.6.497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In 2015, the Korean Atopic Dermatitis Association (KADA) working group published consensus guidelines for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective We aimed to provide updated consensus recommendations for systemic treatment of AD in South Korea based on recent evidence and experience. Methods We compiled a database of references from relevant systematic reviews and guidelines on the systemic management of AD. Evidence for each statement was graded and classified based on thestrength of the recommendation. Forty-two council members from the KADA participated in three rounds of voting to establish a consensus on expert recommendations. Results We do not recommend long-term treatment with systemic steroids forpatients with moderate-to-severe AD due to the risk of adverse effects. We recommend treatment with cyclosporine or dupilumab and selective treatment with methotrexate or azathioprine for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We suggest treatment with antihistamines as an option for alleviating clinical symptoms of AD. We recommend selective treatment with narrowband ultraviolet B for patients with chronic moderate-to-severe AD. We do not recommend treatment with oral antibiotics for patients with moderate-to-severe AD but who have no signs of infection. We did not reach a consensus on recommendations for treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy, probiotics, evening primrose oil, orvitamin D for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We also recommend educational interventions and counselling for patients with AD and caregivers to improve the treatment success rate. Conclusion We look forward to implementing a new and updated consensus of systemic therapy in controlling patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyun Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Eun Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyeong-Hun Park
- Department of Dermatology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Jung Min Bae
- Department of Dermatology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Byun
- Department of Dermatology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Kyung Shin
- Department of Dermatology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Young Han
- Department of Dermatology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Phil Hong
- Department of Dermatology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Yong Hyun Jang
- Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hye One Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Chan Ho Na
- Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Bark-Lynn Lew
- Department of Dermatology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - JiYoung Ahn
- Department of Dermatology, National Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Ook Park
- Department of Dermatology, Severance Hospital, Cutaneous Biology Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Joon Seo
- Department of Dermatology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Yang Won Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Wook Son
- Department of Dermatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eung Ho Choi
- Department of Dermatology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | - Young Lip Park
- Department of Dermatology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Joo Young Roh
- Department of Dermatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Update on the Pathogenesis and Therapy of Atopic Dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol 2021; 61:324-338. [PMID: 34338977 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08880-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disorder characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and intense itch. Although it most often starts in infancy and affects children, it is also highly prevalent in adults. In this article, the main aspects of AD have been updated, with a focus on the pathogenetic and therapeutic aspects. The pathogenesis of AD is complex, and it is evident that a strong genetic predisposition, epidermal dysfunction, skin microbiome abnormalities, immune dysregulation, and the neuroimmune system are critical in AD development. Mutations in the genes associated with disrupted epidermal barrier, exaggerated pathological inflammation and inadequate antimicrobial peptides can promote enhanced Th2 inflammation and mediate pruritus. Current understanding of etiology highlights gut microbial diversity, NK cell deficiency, and different immunological phenotype with age and race. For topical anti-inflammatory treatment for mild-to-severe AD, phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors (PDE-4), JAK inhibitors, and microbiome transplantation with Roseomonas mucosa provided more management selections. The treatment of moderate-to-severe AD has been limited to merely symptomatic and relatively nonspecific immunosuppressive approaches. In-depth understanding of the pathogenesis of AD has led to the development of innovative and targeted therapies, such as biologic agents targeting interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13 and JAK/STAT inhibitors. Other potential therapeutic agents for AD include agents targeting the T helper (Th) 22 and Th17/IL23 pathway. Antipruritic therapy and complementary probiotics therapy have also been reviewed.
Collapse
|
24
|
Iannone M, Tonini G, Janowska A, Dini V, Romanelli M. Definition of treatment goals in terms of clinician-reported disease severity and patient-reported outcomes in moderate-to-severe adult atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Curr Med Res Opin 2021; 37:1295-1301. [PMID: 34027753 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1933929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronically relapsing skin disease. Although a definitive cure is not available, appropriate treatment can control the disease. The advent of biologic drugs has led to the need for a clear definition of the disease severity and treatment response. A standardized list of outcomes that defines clinician-reported disease severity and patients' reported severity are therefore essential. Solid criteria to define the response to treatment and treatment failure are lacking to date. OBJECTIVE This systematic review defines treatment goals in terms of clinician-reported disease severity and patient-reported outcomes, referring to the published moderate-to-severe AD clinical trials. The application of these goals in daily clinical practice will ensure a better selection of available treatment options, thus increasing patient quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify the treatments goals of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) on moderate-to-severe adult AD published between January 2000 and October 2020. RESULTS In total, 14 studies met the eligibility criteria. The most widely used tools in terms of clinician-reported disease severity were the Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) followed by the Eczema Area Severity Score (EASI) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA). For disease severity scales as efficacy outcome in RCTs, the greatest standardization and reproducibility was for improvement of at least 50% in EASI score and IGA score reduction of ≥2 grades from baseline. The most widely used tools from the patients' perspective were the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Numeric Rate Scale (NRS)-itch and Patient Oriented Eczema Measure Score (POEM). In terms of patients' reported efficacy outcomes in RCTs, a numerical DLQI, NRS-itch and POEM score improvement of at least 4 points from baseline was reported. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review highlights the need for collaboration between experts in order to define and optimize treatment outcomes. Despite considerable progress in harmonizing outcome measures, promoted by the foundation of the Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative in 2008, our results demonstrate that this endpoint is still an unmet need. Based on the literature data we propose a minimum treatment goal algorithm for use in daily clinical practice aimed at stimulating a discussion on how the care of AD patients could be further improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giulia Tonini
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Agata Janowska
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valentina Dini
- Department of Dermatology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yousaf M, Ayasse M, Ahmed A, Gwillim E, Janmohamed SR, Yousaf A, Patel KR, Thyssen JP, Silverberg JI. Association between Atopic Dermatitis and Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br J Dermatol 2021; 186:227-235. [PMID: 34319589 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies found conflicting results about the association of atopic dermatitis (AD) with hypertension. OBJECTIVES Determine whether AD and AD severity are associated with hypertension. METHODS A systematic review was performed of published studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and GREAT databases. At least 2 reviewers conducted title/abstract, full-text review, and data extraction. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Fifty-one studies met inclusion criteria; 19 had sufficient data for meta-analysis. AD was associated with higher odds of hypertension compared to healthy controls (increased in 9 of 16 studies; pooled prevalence: 16.4% vs 13.8%; random-effects regression, pooled unadjusted odds ratio [OR][95% confidence interval <CI95>]: 1.16 [1.04-1.30]), but lower odds of hypertension compared to psoriasis (decreased in 5 of 8 studies; 15.4% vs 24.8%; 0.53 [0.37-0.76]). In particular, moderate-severe AD were associated with hypertension compared to healthy controls (increased in 4 of 6 studies; 24.9% vs 14.7%; 2.33 [1.10-4.94]). Hypertension was commonly reported as an adverse-event secondary to AD treatments, particularly systemic cyclosporine A. Limitations include lack of longitudinal studies or individual-level data and potential confounding. CONCLUSIONS AD, particularly moderate-to-severe disease, was associated with increased hypertension compared to healthy controls, but lower odds than psoriasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Yousaf
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - M Ayasse
- Department of Dermatology, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
| | - A Ahmed
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - E Gwillim
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S R Janmohamed
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Dermatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Yousaf
- Department of Dermatology, West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown
| | - K R Patel
- Department of Dermatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J P Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev-Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - J I Silverberg
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Davari DR, Nieman EL, McShane DB, Morrell DS. Current Perspectives on the Systemic Management of Atopic Dermatitis. J Asthma Allergy 2021; 14:595-607. [PMID: 34103945 PMCID: PMC8179820 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s287638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common disease of childhood, and some patients experience a prolonged clinical course into adolescence and adulthood. Systemic management is required when AD is not adequately controlled with topical medications. Our aim is to provide a comprehensive review of commonly used systemic immunomodulating agents in childhood and adult AD, including cyclosporine A (CsA), azathioprine (AZA), methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), which are prescribed off-label in the United States, as well as dupilumab, an FDA-approved biologic. We will also provide a brief overview of emerging systemic therapies currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle R Davari
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth L Nieman
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Diana B McShane
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Dean S Morrell
- Department of Dermatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Marko M, Pawliczak R. Can we safely use systemic treatment in atopic dermatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic? Overview of selected conventional and biologic systemic therapies. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:619-627. [PMID: 33866905 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.1919511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Since the onset of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the medical community has faced major challenges that affect disease management in all areas. Dermatologists and immunologists have to choose appropriate treatment strategy taking into consideration the risk of infection and possible exacerbation of the course of the disease in patients with confirmed infection. Management of atopic dermatitis (AD) in moderate to severe cases is based on systemic therapy such as cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate and dupilumab.Areas covered: A literature search in PubMed database was performed until 6 March 2021. In this review, the authors discuss non-biologic and biologic systemic medications for AD and provide an overview of therapeutic recommendations during COVID-19 pandemic.Expert opinion: In case of an active COVID-19 infection, conventional systemic treatment and biological treatment needs to be stopped until clinical recovery. Noninfected patients with systemic treatment of AD should continue their therapy via self-application. The authors can conclude that understanding of dupilumab therapy is better recognized in context AD treatment during COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to cyclosporine, azathioprine and methotrexate. However, this systemic immunosuppressants still require further investigation and literature complementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Marko
- Department of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Rafał Pawliczak
- Department of Immunopathology, Faculty of Medicine, Division of Biomedical Science, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wohlrab J, Mrowietz U, Weidinger S, Werfel T, Wollenberg A. [Recommendations when switching therapy from immunosuppressive drugs to dupilumab in patients with atopic dermatitis]. DER HAUTARZT 2021; 72:321-327. [PMID: 33175219 PMCID: PMC8016796 DOI: 10.1007/s00105-020-04720-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Based on new insights into the molecular pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis, a targeted anti-inflammatory therapy-dupilumab-has recently been approved as treatment alongside glucocorticoids and ciclosporin. Due to their pharmacology, neither glucocorticoids nor ciclosporin nor the off label used substances methotrexate, azathioprine and mycophenolic acid derivatives are suitable for long-term therapy. When switching therapy from small molecular substances to dupilumab, various factors should be considered. Both the specific cause of the change (ineffectiveness, adverse effects or contraindications) as well as the pharmacological conditions should be taken into account. Since there have been no specific clinical studies on this subject so far, the authors relied mainly on a literature search to draw up recommendations for practical everyday use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Wohlrab
- Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06097, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
- An-Institut für angewandte Dermatopharmazie, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle-Wittenberg, Deutschland.
| | - Ulrich Mrowietz
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Weidinger
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland
| | - Andreas Wollenberg
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Siegels D, Heratizadeh A, Abraham S, Binnmyr J, Brockow K, Irvine AD, Halken S, Mortz CG, Flohr C, Schmid‐Grendelmeier P, Poel L, Muraro A, Weidinger S, Werfel T, Schmitt J. Systemic treatments in the management of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2021; 76:1053-1076. [PMID: 33074565 DOI: 10.1111/all.14631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As an evidence resource for the currently planned European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) clinical practice guideline "systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD)," we critically appraised evidence on systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for AD up to February 2020. Primary efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, AD symptoms and health-related quality of life. Primary safety outcomes included cumulative incidence rates for (serious) adverse events. Trial quality was assessed applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate. RESULTS 50 RCTs totalling 6681 patients were included. Trial evidence was identified for apremilast, azathioprine (AZA), baricitinib, ciclosporin A (CSA), corticosteroids, dupilumab, interferon-gamma, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), mepolizumab, methotrexate (MTX), omalizumab, upadacitinib and ustekinumab. Meta-analyses were indicated for the efficacy of baricitinib [EASI75 RD 0.16, 95% CI (0.10;0.23)] and dupilumab [EASI75, RD 0.37, 95% CI (0.32;0.42)] indicating short-term (ie 16-week treatment) superiority over placebo. Furthermore, efficacy analyses of AZA and CSA indicated short-term superiority over placebo; however, nonvalidated scores were used and can therefore not be compared to EASI. CONCLUSION The most robust, replicated high-quality trial evidence is present for the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for up to 1 year in adults. Robust trial evidence was further revealed for AZA, baricitinib and CSA. Methodological restrictions led to limited evidence-based conclusions for all other systemic treatments. Head-to-head trials with novel systemic treatments are required to clarify the future role of conventional therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doreen Siegels
- Center for Evidence‐Based Healthcare University Hospital Dresden Dresden Germany
| | - Annice Heratizadeh
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - Susanne Abraham
- Center for Evidence‐Based Healthcare University Hospital Dresden Dresden Germany
- Department of Dermatology Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus University Allergy Center TU DresdenDresden Germany
| | - Jonas Binnmyr
- The Swedish Asthma‐ and Allergy Association Stockholm Sweden
- The Swedish Asthma‐ and Allergy Research Foundation Stockholm Sweden
| | - Knut Brockow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein School of Medicine Technical University of Munich Munich Germany
| | - Alan D. Irvine
- Department of Clinical Medicine Trinity College Dublin Ireland
- Dermatology, Children’s Health Ireland National Children’s Research Centre Dublin Ireland
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children’s Hospital Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Charlotte G Mortz
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense University Hospital Odense Denmark
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Unit for Population‐Based Dermatology Research St John's Institute of Dermatology Guy’s & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London London UK
| | - Peter Schmid‐Grendelmeier
- Allergy Unit Department of Dermatology University Hospital of Zurich Zurich
- Christine‐Kuehne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK_CARE Davos Switzerland
| | - Lauri‐Ann Poel
- Department of Paediatric Allergy Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust UK
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Department of Woman and Child Health Food Allergy Referral Centre Padua University Hospital Padua Italy
| | - Stephan Weidinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel Germany
| | - Thomas Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence‐Based Healthcare University Hospital Dresden Dresden Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Akacha A, Badraoui R, Rebai T, Zourgui L. Effect of Opuntia ficus indica extract on methotrexate-induced testicular injury: a biochemical, docking and histological study. J Biomol Struct Dyn 2020; 40:4341-4351. [PMID: 33305699 DOI: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1856187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Methotrexate (MTX) is a chemotherapeutic medicine used in the treatment of several types of cancer and inflammatory diseases. It exhibits several drawbacks especially on highly dividing and developing cells. This study aimed to assess the role of Opuntia ficus indica ethanolic extract on testicular damage induced by MTX in rat. MTX was administrated for 10 days (20 mg/kg). Extract of cactus cladodes (Opuntia ficus indica) was given to MTX-treated rats (0.4 g/kg). Spermatozoa were collected from cauda epididymis and analyzed for sperm count and motility. Testis samples were used for histopathological and oxidative stress studies (assessment of malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, protein carbonyls (PCs), catalase (CAT) glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities). Moreover, levels of testosterone were measured in serum by radioimmunoassay. Our results showed that MTX had destructive effects on sperm count and motility associated with significant decrease in testosterone levels in MTX group. This effect was then confirmed by docking results. Testis of MTX group showed increased oxidative stress status. In fact, PCs and MDA were increased and CAT, GPx and SOD were decreased suggesting increased reactive oxygen species and deficiency in enzymatic antioxidant. These findings were associated with disrupted testicular morphology as assessed by histological study. Cladodes extract had protective effects on rat's gonad histology, oxidative stress and improve both sperm parameters (count and motility) and serum testosterone levels. In conclusion, our results suggested that Opuntia ficus indica cladodes extract improved MTX-induced testicular injury and possess potent fertility boosting effects in rats.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amira Akacha
- Higher Institute of Applied Biology (ISBAM) of Medenine, University of Gabés, Medenine, Tunisia.,Laboratory of Functional Neurophysiology and Pathology, Faculty of Science of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| | - Riadh Badraoui
- Laboratory of General Biology, Biology Department, University of Hail, Hail, Saudi Arabia.,Section of Histology - Cytology, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.,Laboratory Histo-embryology and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Tarek Rebai
- Laboratory Histo-embryology and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
| | - Lazhar Zourgui
- Higher Institute of Applied Biology (ISBAM) of Medenine, University of Gabés, Medenine, Tunisia.,Laboratory of Functional Neurophysiology and Pathology, Faculty of Science of Tunis, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wollenberg A, Christen‐Zäch S, Taieb A, Paul C, Thyssen J, Bruin‐Weller M, Vestergaard C, Seneschal J, Werfel T, Cork M, Kunz B, Fölster‐Holst R, Trzeciak M, Darsow U, Szalai Z, Deleuran M, Kobyletzki L, Barbarot S, Heratizadeh A, Gieler U, Hijnen D, Weidinger S, De Raeve L, Svensson Å, Simon D, Stalder J, Ring J. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2020 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020; 34:2717-2744. [DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Revised: 07/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Wollenberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Ludwig‐Maximilian‐University Munich Germany
| | - S. Christen‐Zäch
- Pediatric Dermatology Unit Departments of Dermatology and Pediatrics Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois Lausanne Switzerland
| | - A. Taieb
- University of Bordeaux Bordeaux France
| | - C. Paul
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Toulouse University and CHU Toulouse France
| | - J.P. Thyssen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Herlev‐Gentofte HospitalUniversity of Copenhagen Hellerup Denmark
| | - M. Bruin‐Weller
- National Expertise Center for Atopic Dermatitis Department of Dermatology and Allergology University Medical Center Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - C. Vestergaard
- Department of Dermatology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - J. Seneschal
- Department of Dermatology National Reference Center for Rare Skin Diseases Bordeaux University Hospitals Bordeaux France
| | - T. Werfel
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - M.J. Cork
- Sheffield Dermatology Research IICDUniversity of Sheffield UK
| | - B. Kunz
- Dermatologikum Hamburg Hamburg Germany
| | - R. Fölster‐Holst
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel Germany
| | - M. Trzeciak
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology Medical University of Gdansk Gdansk Poland
| | - U. Darsow
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- ZAUM – Center of Allergy & Environment Munich Germany
| | - Z. Szalai
- Department of Dermatology Heim Pál National Children’s Institute Budapest Hungary
| | - M. Deleuran
- Department of Dermatology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - L. Kobyletzki
- School of Medical Sciences Lund University Malmö Sweden
- School of Medical Sciences Örebro University Örebro Sweden
| | - S. Barbarot
- Department of Dermatology CHU Nantes UMR 1280 PhAN INRA, F‐44000 Nantes Université Nantes France
| | - A. Heratizadeh
- Division of Immunodermatology and Allergy Research Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
| | - U. Gieler
- Department of Dermatology University of Gießen and Marburg GmbH Gießen Germany
| | - D.J. Hijnen
- Department of Dermatology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - S. Weidinger
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy University Hospital Schleswig‐Holstein Kiel Germany
| | - L. De Raeve
- Department of Dermatology Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZB)Free University of Brussels (VUB) Brussels Belgium
| | - Å. Svensson
- Department of Dermatology Skane University Hospital Malmö Sweden
| | - D. Simon
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland
| | - J.F. Stalder
- Department of Dermatology CHU Nantes UMR 1280 PhAN INRAE, F‐44000 Nantes Université Nantes France
| | - J. Ring
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein Technische Universität München Munich Germany
- Christiane‐Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education (CK‐Care) Davos Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lam M, Zhu JW, Maqbool T, Adam G, Tadrous M, Rochon P, Drucker AM. Inclusion of Older Adults in Randomized Clinical Trials for Systemic Medications for Atopic Dermatitis. JAMA Dermatol 2020; 156:1240. [DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Lam
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jie Wei Zhu
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Talha Maqbool
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gaelen Adam
- Center for Evidence Synthesis in Health, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Mina Tadrous
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paula Rochon
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron M. Drucker
- Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Dermatology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Sawangjit R, Dilokthornsakul P, Lloyd-Lavery A, Lai NM, Dellavalle R, Chaiyakunapruk N. Systemic treatments for eczema: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD013206. [PMID: 32927498 PMCID: PMC8128359 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013206.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Eczema is a common and chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder. It seriously impacts quality of life and economic outcomes, especially for those with moderate to severe eczema. Various treatments allow sustained control of the disease; however, their relative benefit remains unclear due to the limited number of trials directly comparing treatments. OBJECTIVES To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of different types of systemic immunosuppressive treatments for moderate to severe eczema using NMA and to generate rankings of available systemic immunosuppressive treatments for eczema according to their efficacy and safety. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases up to August 2019: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase. SELECTION CRITERIA All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic immunosuppressive agents for moderate to severe atopic eczema when compared against placebo or any other eligible eczema treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We synthesised data using pair-wise analysis and NMA to compare treatments and rank them according to their effectiveness. Effectiveness was assessed primarily by determining the proportion of participants who achieved at least 75% improvement in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI75) and improvement in the Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM). Safety was evaluated primarily by considering the proportion of participants with serious adverse events (SAEs) and infection. We deemed short-term follow-up as ≤ 16 weeks and long-term follow-up as > 16 weeks. We assessed the certainty of the body of evidence from the NMA for these primary outcomes using six domains of CiNEMA grading. MAIN RESULTS We included a total of 74 studies, with 8177 randomised participants. Approximately 55% of participants were male, with average age of 32 years (range 2 to 84 years), although age and gender were unreported for 419 and 902 participants, respectively. Most of the included trials were placebo controlled (65%), 34% were head-to-head studies (15% assessed the effects of different doses of the same drug), and 1% were multi-armed studies with both an active comparator and a placebo. All trials included participants with moderate to severe eczema, but 62% of studies did not separate data by severity; 38% of studies assessed only severe eczema. The total duration of included trials ranged from 2 weeks to 60 months, whereas treatment duration varied from a single dose (CIM331, KPL-716) to 60 months (methotrexate (MTX)). Seventy studies were available for quantitative synthesis; this review assessed 29 immunosuppressive agents from three classes of interventions. These included (1) conventional treatments, with ciclosporin assessed most commonly; (2) small molecule treatments, including phosphodiesterase (PDE)-4 inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors; and (3) biological treatments, including anti-CD31 receptors, anti-interleukin (IL)-22, anti-IL-31, anti-IL-13, anti-IL-12/23p40, anti-OX40, anti-TSLP, anti-CRTH2, and anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) monoclonal antibodies, but most commonly dupilumab. Most trials (73) assessed outcomes at a short-term duration ranging from 2 to 16 weeks, whereas 33 trials assessed long-term outcomes, with duration ranging from 5 to 60 months. All participants were from a hospital setting. Fifty-two studies declared a source of funding, and of these, pharmaceutical companies funded 88%. We rated 37 studies as high risk; 21, unclear risk, and 16, low risk of bias, with studies most commonly at high risk of attrition bias. Network meta-analysis suggests that dupilumab ranks first for effectiveness when compared with other biological treatments. Dupilumab is more effective than placebo in achieving EASI75 (risk ratio (RR) 3.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.51 to 3.69) and improvement in POEM score (mean difference 7.30, 95% CI 6.61 to 8.00) at short-term follow-up (high-certainty evidence). Very low-certainty evidence means we are uncertain of the effects of dupilumab when compared with placebo, in terms of the proportion of participants who achieve EASI75 (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.87 to 3.60) at longer-term follow-up. Low-certainty evidence indicates that tralokinumab may be more effective than placebo in achieving short-term EASI75 (RR 2.54, 95% CI 1.21 to 5.34), but there was no evidence for tralokinumab to allow us to assess short-term follow-up of POEM or long-term follow-up of EASI75. We are uncertain of the effect of ustekinumab compared with placebo in achieving EASI75 (long-term follow-up: RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.40 to 3.45; short-term follow-up: RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.28 to 2.97; both very low certainty). We found no evidence on ustekinumab for the POEM outcome. We are uncertain whether other immunosuppressive agents that targeted our key outcomes influence the achievement of short-term EASI75 compared with placebo due to low- or very low-certainty evidence. Dupilumab and ustekinumab were the only immunosuppressive agents evaluated for longer-term EASI75. Dupilumab was the only agent evaluated for improvement in POEM during short-term follow-up. Low- to moderate-certainty evidence indicates a lower proportion of participants with SAEs after treatment with QAW039 and dupilumab compared to placebo during short-term follow-up, but low- to very low-certainty evidence suggests no difference in SAEs during short-term follow-up of other immunosuppressive agents compared to placebo. Evidence for effects of immunosuppressive agents on risk of any infection during short-term follow-up and SAEs during long-term follow-up compared with placebo was of low or very low certainty but did not indicate a difference. We did not identify differences in other adverse events (AEs), but dupilumab is associated with specific AEs, including eye inflammation and eosinophilia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that dupilumab is the most effective biological treatment for eczema. Compared to placebo, dupilumab reduces eczema signs and symptoms in the short term for people with moderate to severe atopic eczema. Short-term safety outcomes from clinical trials did not reveal new safety concerns with dupilumab. Overall, evidence for the efficacy of most other immunosuppressive treatments for moderate to severe atopic eczema is of low or very low certainty. Given the lack of data comparing conventional with newer biological treatments for the primary outcomes, there remains high uncertainty for ranking the efficacy and safety of conventional treatments such as ciclosporin and biological treatments such as dupilumab. Most studies were placebo-controlled and assessed only short-term efficacy of immunosuppressive agents. Further adequately powered head-to-head RCTs should evaluate comparative long-term efficacy and safety of available treatments for moderate to severe eczema.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ratree Sawangjit
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahasarakham University, Mahasarakham, Thailand
| | - Piyameth Dilokthornsakul
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
| | - Antonia Lloyd-Lavery
- Department of Dermatology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Nai Ming Lai
- School of Medicine, Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
| | | | - Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ricardo JW, Lipner SR. Considerations for safety in the use of systemic medications for psoriasis and atopic dermatitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33:e13687. [PMID: 32458536 PMCID: PMC7283778 DOI: 10.1111/dth.13687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) is responsible for at least 2 546 527 cases and 175 812 deaths as of April 21, 2020. Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis (AD) are common, chronic, inflammatory skin conditions, with immune dysregulation as a shared mechanism; therefore, mainstays of treatment include systemic immunomodulating therapies. It is unknown whether these therapies are associated with increased COVID‐19 susceptibility or worse outcomes in infected patients. In this review, we discuss overall infection risks of nonbiologic and biologic systemic medications for psoriasis and AD and provide therapeutic recommendations. In summary, in patients with active infection, systemic conventional medications, the Janus kinase inhibitor tofacitinib, and biologics for psoriasis should be temporarily held until there is more data; in uninfected patients switching to safer alternatives should be considered. Interleukin (IL)‐17, IL‐12/23, and IL‐23 inhibitors are associated with low infection risk, with IL‐17 and IL‐23 favored over IL‐12/23 inhibitors. Pivotal trials and postmarketing data also suggest that IL‐17 and IL‐23 blockers are safer than tumor necrosis factor alpha blockers. Apremilast, acitretin, and dupilumab have favorable safety data and may be safely initiated and continued in uninfected patients. Without definitive COVID‐19 data, these recommendations may be useful in guiding treatment of psoriasis and AD patients during the COVID‐19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose W Ricardo
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shari R Lipner
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Howell AN, Ghamrawi RI, Strowd LC, Feldman SR. Pharmacological management of atopic dermatitis in the elderly. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:761-771. [PMID: 32100586 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1729738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in geriatric populations of industrialized countries is currently estimated at 3-4% and continues to increase. AD is associated with significant morbidity, increased susceptibility to infection, and symptoms of pruritus and pain. Treatments may negatively affect elderly patients; thus, plans should be optimized for this population. AREAS COVERED This review summarizes treatment options for AD in the elderly. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using the key terms atopic dermatitis, elderly, geriatric, systemic therapy, therapy, and topical therapy in PubMed. Searches yielded articles on skincare management and topical and systemic pharmacotherapies. EXPERT OPINION Proper use of moisturizer is crucial in all patients with AD. Topical corticosteroids are commonly prescribed; however, they carry an increased risk of adverse events such as skin atrophy. Systemic corticosteroids should be avoided in elderly patients due to questionable efficacy and increased adverse events. Topical calcineurin inhibitors and crisaborole are similarly efficacious with an excellent safety profile. Cyclosporine, azathioprine, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil are systemic agents available for the treatment of refractory AD; however, insufficient data exist to indicate the superiority of any one agent. Dupilumab is a safe and efficacious injectable therapy in elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander N Howell
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Rima I Ghamrawi
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Lindsay C Strowd
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Department of Dermatology, University of Southern Denmark , Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee JH, Yun SJ, Lee JB, Lee SC. Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Retrospective Study of Korean Patients at Tertiary Referral Hospital. Ann Dermatol 2020; 32:402-408. [PMID: 33911775 PMCID: PMC7992581 DOI: 10.5021/ad.2020.32.5.402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methotrexate (MTX) has been prescribed to suppress atopic dermatitis (AD) symptoms and flares in moderate-to-severe cases. Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of MTX as well as the suppressive activity of MTX to reduce flares in moderate-to-severe AD patients. Methods Patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were treated with MTX at the Chonnam National University Hospital were retrospectively studied. Results Total 102 patients (79 males, 23 females) with a median age of 22.0±10.3 years were studied. The median initial dose of MTX was 10.3±2.6 mg/week, and the MTX-weekly dose was increased by 2.5 to 5 mg at an interval of 2 to 4 weeks to a maximum dose of 17.5±2.7 mg/week. The median maintenance dose was 11.7±2.1 mg/week; the median duration of treatment with MTX was 34.0±38.8 weeks. The initial response was noted after 5.8±3.7 weeks. Of the 102 patients, 60.8% (62/102) showed successful treatment response and 39.2% (40/102) showed mild or no improvement. MTX therapy effectively suppressed the frequency of AD flares by more than 50% in 71.1% (32/45) of the patients who responded among the MTX responders group. The most common adverse events were transient liver abnormality (5.9%, 6/102) and gastrointestinal discomfort (3.9%, 4/102), but no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion Our results reveal that MTX is a relatively safe drug to control moderate-to-severe AD with satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and inhibitory activity against AD flares.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hong Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sook-Jung Yun
- Department of Dermatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jee-Bum Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung-Chul Lee
- Department of Dermatology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
|
38
|
Rademaker M, Agnew K, Andrews M, Baker C, Foley P, Gebauer K, Gupta M, Rubel DM, Somerville C, Sullivan J, Wong LC. Managing atopic dermatitis with systemic therapies in adults and adolescents: An Australian/New Zealand narrative. Australas J Dermatol 2019; 61:9-22. [PMID: 31529493 DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
With the rapid development of new, targeted therapies for the treatment of moderate/severe atopic dermatitis, it is opportune to review the available conventional systemic agents. We assess the published evidence for systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis and amalgamate this with real-world experience. Discussions are centred on when systemic therapy should be considered, which drug(s), what dose, how to sequence or combine these therapies, how long they should be continued for and what is considered success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius Rademaker
- Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland's Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Hamilton, New Zealand
| | - Karen Agnew
- Dermatology Department, Greenlane Clinical Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.,Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Christopher Baker
- St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Skin & Cancer Foundation Inc., Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Foley
- St Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Skin & Cancer Foundation Inc., Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kurt Gebauer
- University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,Probity Medical Research, Freemantle, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Monisha Gupta
- Department of Dermatology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Skin Hospital, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.,University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Diana M Rubel
- Woden Dermatology, Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Colin Somerville
- The Allergy West Clinic - Immunology, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - John Sullivan
- Kingsway Dermatology, Miranda, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Li-Chuen Wong
- The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Barbarot S. Une nouvelle ère thérapeutique pour la dermatite atopique. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2019; 146:525-527. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
Saleem S, Kazmi I, Ahmad A, Abuzinadah MF, Samkari A, Alkrathy HM, Khan R. Thiamin Regresses the Anticancer Efficacy of Methotrexate in the Amelioration of Diethyl Nitrosamine-Induced Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Wistar Strain Rats. Nutr Cancer 2019; 72:170-181. [PMID: 31088230 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1614199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and occurs frequently in patients with liver cirrhosis. HCC is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality around the globe.Aim: This study assessed the effects of thiamin in the anticancer activity of methotrexate (MTX) in diethyl nitrosamine (DEN) induced hepatocellular Carcinoma in Wistar strain male rats.Method: Fifty rats were randomly segregated in five groups with 10 rats in each group. HCC was induced by single intraperitoneal (i.p) dose of DEN (200 mg/kg) and HCC promoter phenobarbital was used in the basal diet (0.05%) for 5 days per week until the termination of the study in all the rats except for the normal control (NC) group. Disease control (DC) was given no treatment, while DM (DEN + MTX) and DT (DEN + thiamin) groups were given MTX (5 mg/kg, i.p per week for 16 weeks) and thiamin (25 mg/kg, orally, daily for 16 weeks), respectively. DMT (DEN + MTX + thiamin) group was given the combined dose of MTX and thiamin. Histopathological study was carried out to confirm the liver function tests such as α-feto protein (AFP), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), total bilirubin (TB), and total protein (TP) along with antioxidants vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), lipid per-oxidation (LPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase (CAT).Results: Results showed that liver biomarkers and antioxidants parameters were still abnormal in the DC group while DM group showed significant restoration, but DT group showed less significant normalization. DMT showed mild recovery of these parameters.Conclusion: The mechanism of action of MTX and thiamin is antiparallel to each other and hence their concomitant administration may lead to inefficient anticancer activity of MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shakir Saleem
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medical and Allied Sciences, KR Mangalam University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
| | - Imran Kazmi
- College of Pharmacy, Shine Abdur Razzaq Institute of Health Education and Research Centre Irba, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India
| | - Aftab Ahmad
- Health Information Technology Department, Jeddah Community College, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed F Abuzinadah
- Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ali Samkari
- Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Huda M Alkrathy
- Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ruqaiyah Khan
- Department of Pharmacology, Siddhartha Institute of Pharmacy, Dehradun, India
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Aoki V, Lorenzini D, Orfali RL, Zaniboni MC, de Oliveira ZNP, Rivitti-Machado MC, Takaoka R, Weber MB, Cestari T, Gontijo B, Ramos AMC, Silva CMDR, Cestari SDCP, Souto-Mayor S, Carneiro FR, de Cerqueira AMM, Laczynski C, Pires MC. Consensus on the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis - Brazilian Society of Dermatology. An Bras Dermatol 2019; 94:67-75. [PMID: 31166406 PMCID: PMC6544038 DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.2019940210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atopic dermatitis is a highly prevalent inflammatory and pruritic dermatosis with a multifactorial etiology, which includes skin barrier defects, immune dysfunction, and microbiome alterations. Atopic dermatitis is mediated by genetic, environmental, and psychological factors and requires therapeutic management that covers all the aspects of its complex pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES The aim of this article is to present the experience, opinions, and recommendations of Brazilian dermatology experts regarding the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis. METHODS Eighteen experts from 10 university hospitals with experience in atopic dermatitis were appointed by the Brazilian Society of Dermatology to organize a consensus on the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis. The 18 experts answered an online questionnaire with 14 questions related to the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Afterwards, they analyzed the recent international guidelines on atopic dermatitis of the American Academy of Dermatology, published in 2014, and of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, published in 2018. Consensus was defined as approval by at least 70% of the panel. RESULTS/CONCLUSION The experts stated that the therapeutic management of atopic dermatitis is based on skin hydration, topical anti-inflammatory agents, avoidance of triggering factors, and educational programs. Systemic therapy, based on immunosuppressive agents, is only indicated for severe refractory disease and after failure of topical therapy. Early detection and treatment of secondary bacterial and viral infections is mandatory, and hospitalization may be needed to control atopic dermatitis flares. Novel target-oriented drugs such as immunobiologicals are invaluable therapeutic agents for atopic dermatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Aoki
- Department of Dermatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de
São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Daniel Lorenzini
- Dermatology Service, Irmandade Santa Casa de Misericórdia de
Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
| | - Raquel Leão Orfali
- Department of Dermatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de
São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Roberto Takaoka
- Department of Dermatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de
São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | - Magda Blessmann Weber
- Dermatology Service, Universidade Federal de Ciências da
Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
| | - Tania Cestari
- Dermatology Service, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre,
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil
| | - Bernardo Gontijo
- Dermatology Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade
Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil
| | - Andrea Machado Coelho Ramos
- Dermatology Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade
Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte (MG), Brazil
| | | | | | - Silvia Souto-Mayor
- Clinic of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculdade de
Medicina da Santa Casa de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP), Brazil
| | | | | | - Cristina Laczynski
- Dermatology Outpatient Clinic, Discipline of Dermatology,
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André (SP), Brazil
| | - Mario Cezar Pires
- Dermatology Service, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual,
São Paulo (SP), Brazil
- Dermatology Service, Complexo Hospitalar Padre Bento, Guarulhos
(SP), Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Faiz S, Giovannelli J, Podevin C, Jachiet M, Bouaziz JD, Reguiai Z, Nosbaum A, Lasek A, Ferrier le Bouedec MC, Du Thanh A, Raison-Peyron N, Tetart F, Duval-Modeste AB, Misery L, Aubin F, Dompmartin A, Morice C, Droitcourt C, Soria A, Arnault JP, Delaunay J, Mahé E, Richard MA, Schoeffler A, Lacour JP, Begon E, Walter-Lepage A, Dillies AS, Rappelle-Duruy S, Barete S, Bellon N, Bénéton N, Valois A, Barbarot S, Sénéchal J, Staumont-Sallé D. Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in a real-life French multicenter adult cohort. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019; 81:143-151. [PMID: 30825533 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dupilumab is the first biologic available to treat atopic dermatitis (AD). Its effectiveness and safety were demonstrated in clinical trials. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with AD in a real-life French multicenter retrospective cohort. METHODS We included patients treated during March 2017-April 2018. Efficacy outcomes, including Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) scores, were collected at baseline and 3 months when available. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded at follow-up. RESULTS We included 241 patients. The median ± interquartile range (IQR) follow-up time was 3.8 ± 3.7 months. A ≥75% improvement in SCORAD was achieved in 27 of 163 (16.6%) patients, and a ≥75% improvement in EASI was achieved in 40 of 82 (48.8%) patients. The median SCORAD and EASI scores at 3 months were significantly lower than those at baseline (SCORAD ± IQR, 25 ± 21 vs 56 ± 27.4, P < 10-9 and EASI ± IQR, 4.1 ± 6.8 vs 17.9 ± 15.4, P < 10-9, respectively). Conjunctivitis was reported in 84 of 241 (38.2%) patients. The proportion with eosinophilia (>500 cells/mm3) during follow-up (57%) was higher than that at baseline (33.7%) (n = 172, P < 10-6). Dupilumab was stopped in 42 cases; 27 patients stopped because of AEs. LIMITATIONS No control group, missing data. CONCLUSION This real-life study demonstrated a similar dupilumab effectiveness as that seen in clinical trials, but it also revealed a higher frequency of conjunctivitis and eosinophilia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Faiz
- CHU de Lille, Service de dermatologie, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Jonathan Giovannelli
- CHU de Lille, Service de dermatologie, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ Lille, INSERM U995, Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Céline Podevin
- Univ Lille, INSERM U995, Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Marie Jachiet
- Dermatology Department, and Université́ Paris Diderot Paris VII, Sorbonne Paris Cité APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jean-David Bouaziz
- Dermatology Department, and Université́ Paris Diderot Paris VII, Sorbonne Paris Cité APHP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Ziad Reguiai
- Service de dermatologie, Polyclinique Courlancy, Reims, France
| | - Audrey Nosbaum
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Pierre Benite, University of Lyon, Lyon, France, CIRI (International Center for Infectiology Research), INSERM U1111, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Audrey Lasek
- Service de dermatologie, Hospital St Vincent de Paul, Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille, France
| | | | - Aurélie Du Thanh
- Service de dermatologie, CHU Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, PCCI, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Nadia Raison-Peyron
- Service de dermatologie, CHU Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, PCCI, INSERM, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Florence Tetart
- Department of Dermatology, Inserm U519, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | - Laurent Misery
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Brest, Brest, France
| | - François Aubin
- Service de dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Besançon Université de Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Anne Dompmartin
- Department of Dermatology, Caen University Hospital Center, France
| | - Cécile Morice
- Department of Dermatology, Caen University Hospital Center, France
| | - Catherine Droitcourt
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Pontchaillou, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Angèle Soria
- Service de Dermatologie et d'Allergologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris HUEP, APHP, Paris, France Sorbonne Universités Paris, Centre d'Immunologie et des Maladies Infectieuses - Paris (Cimi-Paris), INSERM U1135, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Emmanuel Mahé
- Department of Dermatology, Hôpital Victor Dupouy Argenteuil, Argenteuil, France
| | - Marie-Aleth Richard
- Aix-Marseille University, EA 3279, CEReSS- Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Dermatology Department, Timone Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, 13385, France
| | - Amélie Schoeffler
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Bel Air, Centre Hospitalier Régional Metz-Thionville
| | | | - Edouard Begon
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre Hospitalier René-Dubos, Pontoise, France
| | | | | | | | - Stéphane Barete
- Unité Fonctionnelle de Dermatologie, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Nathalia Bellon
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital Necker, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | - Aude Valois
- Service de Dermatologie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte Anne, Toulon, France
| | | | - Julien Sénéchal
- Service de Dermatologie, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de la Peau, Hôpital Saint André, CHU de Bordeaux, France; INSERM U1035 Biothérapie des Maladies Génétiques Inflammatoires et Cancers, Immuno-Dermatologie ATIP AVENIR, Université de Bordeaux, France
| | - Delphine Staumont-Sallé
- CHU de Lille, Service de dermatologie, F-59000 Lille, France; Univ Lille, INSERM U995, Lille Inflammation Research International Center, F-59000, Lille, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Alexander H, Patton T, Jabbar-Lopez ZK, Manca A, Flohr C. Novel systemic therapies in atopic dermatitis: what do we need to fulfil the promise of a treatment revolution? F1000Res 2019; 8. [PMID: 30774935 PMCID: PMC6357995 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.17039.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who do not adequately respond to topical therapy and phototherapy often need systemic immunomodulatory treatment to control their symptoms. Conventional systemic agents, such as ciclosporin, azathioprine, and methotrexate, have been used for decades, but there are concerns about their safety profile. There are now many novel systemic agents emerging through clinical trials, which may have great potential in the treatment of AD. Despite this, there are very few data comparing the performance of these drugs against each other. The purpose of this article is to review the current systemic therapies in AD and present an indirect comparison of systemic AD treatments using effectiveness and safety data from published randomised controlled trials, highlighting important remaining gaps in knowledge. Although the latest developments in systemic AD treatments are exciting and dearly needed, further work is required before the promise of a therapeutic revolution becomes reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Alexander
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Patton
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Zarif K Jabbar-Lopez
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrea Manca
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Carsten Flohr
- Unit for Population-Based Dermatology Research, St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Goujon C, Nicolas JF, Nosbaum A. Methotrexate in atopic eczema. Comments to: Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019; 33:e154-e155. [PMID: 30520142 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- C Goujon
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, University of Lyon, 495 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - J F Nicolas
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, University of Lyon, 495 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.,CIRI (International Center for Infectiology Research) INSERM U1111, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR5308, 21 avenue Tony Garnier, Lyon, 69007, France
| | - A Nosbaum
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Lyon Sud University Hospital, University of Lyon, 495 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.,CIRI (International Center for Infectiology Research) INSERM U1111, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS UMR5308, 21 avenue Tony Garnier, Lyon, 69007, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Lorz LR, Kim MY, Cho JY. Medicinal potential of Panax ginseng and its ginsenosides in atopic dermatitis treatment. J Ginseng Res 2019; 44:8-13. [PMID: 32095092 PMCID: PMC7033350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory disease that affects 1%-20% of people worldwide. Despite affecting many people, AD current treatments, such as corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, have not only harmful secondary effects but are also often ineffective. Therefore, natural nontoxic compounds are on high demand for developing new effective AD treatments. Panax ginseng Meyer has been used traditionally for its promising healing and restorative properties to treat many diseases including skin disorders, reason why in this review we want to explore the research performed with AD and P. ginseng as well as determining its potential for new drug development. Previous researches have shown that P. ginseng has positive effects in AD patients such as lower eczema area and severity index, transepidermal water loss, and immunoglobulin E levels and better quality of sleep. In vivo animal models, as well, have shown positive results to P. ginseng and derived ginsenosides, such as the decrease of transepidermal water loss, immunoglobulin E levels in serum, allergy-related cytokines, and downregulation of NF-κB, MAPK, and Ikaros pathways. All of these previous data suggest that P. ginseng and its derived ginsenosides are undoubtedly a nontoxic effective option to treat AD.
Collapse
Key Words
- AD, atopic dermatitis
- ATX, plasma autotaxin
- Alternative medicine
- Atopic dermatitis
- CCL2, Chemokine ligand 2
- CG, cultivated ginseng
- COX-2, Cyclooxygenase-2
- DFE, Dermatophagoides farinae body extract
- DNFB, 1-fluoro-2,4-dinitrobenzene
- EASY, eczema area and severity index
- FLG, filaggrin
- Filaggrin
- GDP, 20-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-20(S)-protopanaxadiol
- GMCSF, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- Ginsenosides
- HMC-1, human mast cell line
- IFN, interferon
- IL, interleukin
- KRG, Korean Red Ginseng
- LPS, lipopolysaccharide
- MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
- MDC, macrophage-derived chemokine
- MIP-1alpha, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha
- MIP-1beta, macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta
- NO, Nitric oxide
- PMA, phorbol-myristate acetate
- Panax ginseng
- RANTES, regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted
- RGE, red ginseng extract
- TARC, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine
- TEWL, trans epidermal water loss
- TH cell, lymphocyte T helper cell
- TNCB, 2,4,6-trinitro-1-chlorobenzene
- TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-alpha
- TSLP, thymic stromal lymphopoietin
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Rojas Lorz
- Department of Integrative Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Yeon Kim
- School of Systems Biomedical Science, Soongsil University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Youl Cho
- Department of Integrative Biotechnology, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Schatz M, Sicherer SH, Khan D, Zeiger RS. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice 2018 Highlights. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2018; 7:393-411. [PMID: 30557718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A large number of clinically impactful studies and reviews were published in this journal in 2018. This article provides highlights of the original research published in 2018 issues of The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunolgy: In Practice on the subjects of anaphylaxis, asthma, dermatitis, drug allergy, eosinophilic disorders, food allergy, immune deficiency, rhinitis, and urticaria/angioedema and mast cell disorders. Within each topic, practical aspects of diagnosis and management are emphasized. Treatments discussed include lifestyle modifications, allergen avoidance therapy, positive and negative effects of pharmacologic therapy, and various forms of immunologic and desensitization management. We hope this review will help readers consolidate and use this extensive and practical knowledge for the benefit of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schatz
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif.
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - David Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy & Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Robert S Zeiger
- Department of Allergy, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, San Diego, Calif; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, Calif
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Dhadwal G, Albrecht L, Gniadecki R, Poulin Y, Yeung J, Hong CH, Gooderham MJ. Approach to the Assessment and Management of Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis: A Consensus Document. Section IV: Treatment Options for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis. J Cutan Med Surg 2018; 22:21S-29S. [DOI: 10.1177/1203475418805721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of therapy for atopic dermatitis (AD) are to reduce skin inflammation and pruritus, restore skin barrier function, and improve quality of life (QoL). Treatments can be classified as moisturizing and basic care, topical therapy, phototherapy, and systemic therapy. In this review, we summarize the treatments for AD and recommendations for their use.
Collapse
|
48
|
Drucker AM, Bercovitch L. Generating new evidence for old medications: the TREAT trial in paediatric atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 2018; 179:813-814. [PMID: 30318794 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A M Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Canada.,Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, U.S.A
| | - L Bercovitch
- Department of Dermatology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Seger EW, Wechter T, Strowd L, Feldman SR. Relative efficacy of systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 80:411-416.e4. [PMID: 30296535 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.09.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2018] [Revised: 09/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic medications are often required for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) refractory to topical therapies. Biologic medications are a recent advancement in the field and a comparison with standard systemic approaches would be beneficial. OBJECTIVE To compare efficacies of systemic therapies for the treatment of AD. METHODS A systematic literature review was performed using Medline, Ovid, and Embase. Randomized controlled trials looking at the efficacy of systemic treatments for AD in adults and children were included. RESULTS A total of 41 studies met criteria and were included in our final analysis. Consistent improvements in Eczema Area and Severity Index and Scoring Atopic Dermatitis were reported with dupilumab and cyclosporine. Phase 2 clinical trials for lebrikizumab and tralokinumab were effective and would benefit from phase 3 trials. No study reported efficacy of biologic medications in pediatric patients; however, cyclosporine improved clinical severity by the greatest amount in this group. LIMITATIONS A lack of well controlled comparison studies make direct comparisons between the treatments difficult. CONCLUSION For treatment of severe AD, the strongest evidence currently exists for dupilumab and cyclosporine at improving clinical disease severity. Further research is required to determine long-term safety and efficacy of biologic medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward W Seger
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Todd Wechter
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Lindsay Strowd
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Center for Dermatology Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Drucker AM, Ellis A, Jabbar-Lopez Z, Yiu ZZN, Arents BWM, Burton T, Spuls PI, Küster D, Schmitt J, Flohr C. Systemic immunomodulatory treatments for atopic dermatitis: protocol for a systematic review with network meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e023061. [PMID: 30158235 PMCID: PMC6119412 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 07/06/2018] [Accepted: 07/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are numerous new systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in various stages of development and most are being compared with placebo rather than active comparators. In order to understand the relative efficacy and safety of existing and new treatments for atopic dermatitis, robust mixed comparisons (ie, direct and indirect) would be beneficial. To address this gap, this protocol describes methods for a systematic review and network meta-analysis of systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will update the search of a previous systematic review, including searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database and the Global Resource of EczemA Trials database in addition to clinical trial protocol registries. Title, abstract and full paper screening as well as data extraction will be conducted in duplicate by independent researchers. Primary outcomes include efficacy with regards to clinician-reported signs and patient-reported symptoms and safety with regards to withdrawal from treatment due to adverse events and the occurrence of serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will include change in quality of life and itch severity. Where possible and appropriate, network meta-analysis will be performed for each outcome using a random-effects model within a Bayesian framework. If appropriate, the review will be transitioned to a living review with continuous updating of the analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Dissemination in a peer-reviewed scientific journal is planned. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018088112; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Mark Drucker
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine and Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Ellis
- School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Zarif Jabbar-Lopez
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Zenas Z N Yiu
- Dermatology Centre, The University of Manchester, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - Bernd W M Arents
- Dutch Association for People with Atopic Dermatitis (VMCE), Nijkerk, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Burton
- Patient Representative (independent), Nottingham, UK
| | - Phyllis I Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise Küster
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Center for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Carsten Flohr
- St John's Institute of Dermatology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|