Consultation for Elevated Blood Eosinophils: Clinical Presentations, High Value Diagnostic Tests, and Treatment Options

The challenge of diagnosing and classifying eosinophilia and eosinophil disorders: A review

Eosinophilia is a feature of multiple conditions, both hematologic and non-hematologic, and may be associated with organ damage. The pathogenesis of eosinophilia can follow two distinct pathways. Primary eosinophilia is caused by a cell-intrinsic mechanism originating from clonal expansion of eosinophils through acquisition of a somatic mutation, such as FIP1L1-PDGFRA. In recent years, great progress has been made in the field of pathogenesis and molecularly targeted therapy of neoplastic eosinophilia. The diagnostic procedure should include, among other things, morphologic analysis of blood and bone marrow samples, cytogenetics and fluorescence in situ-hybridization tests to detect evidence of an acute or chronic myeloid or lymphoid disorder. Secondary eosinophilia follows a cell-extrinsic mechanism as a response to exogenous cytokines. In most clinical cases, peripheral blood eosinophilia is reactive and typically associated with non-hematological disorders such as infections, allergic conditions, connective tissue disorders, vasculitis, malignancy, or endocrinopathies. Nonetheless, the cause of most cases of hypereosinophilic syndrome remains unknown. In this article, we present a short review focused on differential diagnosis of eosinophilia and eosinophilic disorders. The diagnosis of eosinophilia is a challenge for physicians; thus this review may be useful in clinical practice.

Mepolizumab incompletely suppresses clinical flares in a pilot study of episodic angioedema with eosinophilia

BACKGROUND

Episodic angioedema with eosinophilia (EAE) is a rare multilineage cyclic syndrome of unknown etiology characterized by episodes of angioedema, myalgia, fatigue, and fever that occur every 3 to 8 weeks and resolve between episodes without therapy. Cyclic elevations in serum IL-5 levels and neutrophils precede the increase in absolute eosinophil count (AEC) in most patients.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the role of IL-5-driven eosinophilia in the clinical manifestations of EAE.

METHODS

An open-label pilot study of mepolizumab (700 mg intravenously monthly for 3 months followed by sequential dose reduction to the Food and Drug Administration-approved dose of 300 mg subcutaneously monthly) was conducted. The primary end point was reduction in the number and severity of clinical symptoms as assessed by patient-reported symptom questionnaires. Secondary end points were greater than or equal to 75% reduction in peak AEC after 1 dose of mepolizumab and sustained reduction in AEC after 3 doses of mepolizumab. Exploratory end points included effects of mepolizumab treatment on other cell lineages (numbers and surface marker expression), levels of plasma mediators, and biomarkers of eosinophil activation.

RESULTS

Four female and 1 male (median age, 45 years) participants with EAE were enrolled. None of the 5 participants experienced a reduction in the number of symptomatic flares on mepolizumab therapy, and 1 participant withdrew before study completion because of lack of improvement. Peak AEC was reduced by 75% or more in 3 participants after the first dose of mepolizumab and in 4 participants after 3 doses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a small cohort of participants with EAE, mepolizumab was unsuccessful in substantially reducing clinical symptoms despite reduction in AEC.

Biologics and Hypereosinophilic Syndromes: Knowledge Gaps and Controversies

Hypereosinophilic syndromes (HES) are a heterogeneous group of disorders defined by blood and/or tissue hypereosinophilia and clinical manifestations attributable to the eosinophilia. Although various clinical subtypes of HES have been described, the general approach to therapy in all subtypes has focused on the reduction of blood and tissue eosinophilia to improve symptoms and halt disease progression. Until recently, this typically involved the use of corticosteroids and/or other immunosuppressive or cytotoxic drugs with significant toxicity. Whereas imatinib, the first targeted therapy approved for treatment of HES, has dramatically changed the prognosis of patients with primary (myeloid) forms of HES, it is ineffective in patients with other HES subtypes. For these nonmyeloid patients with HES, the development of eosinophil-targeting biologics (most notably, mepolizumab, the first biologic approved for the treatment of HES) has been transformative. Nevertheless, important issues remain with respect to the efficacy and safety of these biologics in the treatment of the varied subtypes of HES. Moreover, with the increasing number of commercially available biologics with direct or indirect effects on eosinophils, questions related to the choice of initial biologic, potential reasons for biologic failure, and treatment options in the setting of incomplete response are becoming increasingly common.

HES and EGPA: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Elevated eosinophil counts are implicated in multiple diseases, from relatively prevalent organ-specific disorders such as severe eosinophilic asthma, to rare multisystem disorders such as hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Patients with these multisystem diseases, often associated with markedly elevated eosinophil counts, have a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality due to delayed diagnosis or inadequate treatment. A thorough workup of symptomatic patients presenting with elevated eosinophil counts is essential, although in some cases the differential diagnosis may remain difficult because of overlapping presentations between HES and EGPA. Notably, first- and second-line treatment options and response to therapy may differ for specific HES and EGPA variants. Oral corticosteroids are the first line of treatment for HES and EGPA, except when HES is the result of specific mutations driving clonal eosinophilia that are amenable to targeted treatment with a kinase inhibitor. Cytotoxic or immunomodulatory agents may be required for those with severe disease. Novel eosinophil-depleting therapies, such as those targeting interleukin 5 or its receptor, have shown great promise in reducing blood eosinophil counts, and reducing disease flares and relapses in patients with HES and EGPA. Such therapies could reduce the side effects associated with long-term oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressant use. This review provides a pragmatic guide to approaching the diagnosis and clinical management of patients with systemic hypereosinophilic disorders. We highlight practical considerations for clinicians and present cases from real-world clinical practice to show the complexity and challenges associated with diagnosing and treating patients with HES and EGPA.

Eosinophilia attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness in physicians: a cross-sectional survey

Background

Patients with incidental eosinophilia is becoming increasingly common in clinical practice. But it remains challenging to diagnose and treat owing to its complex etiology. The awareness of physicians and the strategies of diagnosis and treatment toward eosinophilia are still unclear.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate attention, diagnosis, treatment, and awareness of eosinophilia among physicians, as well as factors influencing clinical practice, and to find ways to improve the efficacy of this disease.

Design

This is a cross-sectional survey.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1 to 4 June 2021 in a tertiary hospital. Self-administered and validated electronic questionnaire was used to investigate the attention toward eosinophilia, the strategies of diagnosis and treatment, and the awareness in physicians.

Results

A total of 607 valid questionnaires were collected, with a response rate of 84.5%. Among the responders, 65.4% of physicians claimed to be familiar with patients with eosinophilia but only 11.0% of them had read the relevant guidelines or expert consensus. Among 207 physicians who had ever diagnosed patients with eosinophilia, only 19.4% had performed detailed examinations. The accuracy of awareness questions was 1.6-53.5%, and only 26.5% of physicians had high levels of awareness. An increase in the awareness level of up to 2.82 folds was seen among physicians with factors such as job title, encountering patients with eosinophilia, linking patients' conditions to peripheral blood eosinophil count, and paying attention to guidelines.

Conclusion

This study highlighted the importance of raising awareness and knowledge of eosinophilia among physicians in China. More works on education about eosinophilia guideline are needed, which may help physicians make decision with more benefits to patients.

A diagnostic score for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis among eosinophilic disorders

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a form of systemic vasculitis with eosinophilic inflammation. However, existing classification criteria are all designed to classify EGPA among vasculitis and there is no established method distinguishing EGPA from other eosinophilic disorders. The aim of the present study was to propose a scoring system to differentiate EGPA among eosinophilic disorders.

METHODS

Non-supervised hierarchical clustering using Ward's method and principal component analysis (PCA) were performed for 19 clinical parameters of 58 patients with eosinophilia-related diseases at a tertiary university hospital. The newly proposed scoring system was externally validated in 40 patients at another tertiary institution.

RESULTS

Two distinct clusters were identified, and clinical features including peripheral neuropathy, asthma, skin involvement, lung involvement, rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity, myeloperoxidase (MPO)-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) positivity, IgE elevation, C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation, and vasculitis pathological findings were predominantly observed in one of these clusters (p < 0.05). Ten features defining the cluster with a high rate of vasculitis were weighted by PCA to create the E-CASE (EGPA classification among systemic eosinophilia) scoring system, on a 16-point scale. Based on the distribution of scores in the primary cohort, we defined an E-CASE score ≥12 as positive, ≤ 8 as negative, and 9-11 as undeterminable. The sensitivity and specificity of the E-CASE score in the validation cohort were 93.3% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and verified a novel scoring system for differentiating EGPA from other types of eosinophilic disorders.

Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Hypereosinophilic Syndrome

Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a diverse group of disorders characterized by peripheral blood eosinophilia of 1.5 × 10⁹/L (1,500/μL) or greater with evidence of end-organ damage attributable to eosinophilia and no other cause of the end-organ damage. The HES is rare, especially in children. This review aims to provide best practices in diagnosis and treatment of HES in children, including how to differentiate between primary and secondary causes of hypereosinophilia; how to distinguish the differences in clinical presentation, treatment, and prognosis of HES in children and adults; and how to identify key steps in the evaluation and management of HES in children.

Developing a standardized approach for assessing mast cells and eosinophils on tissue biopsies: A Work Group Report of the AAAAI Allergic Skin Diseases Committee

Mast cells and eosinophils are commonly found, expectedly or unexpectedly, in human tissue biopsies. Although the clinical significance of their presence, absence, quantity, and quality continues to be investigated in homeostasis and disease, there are currently gaps in knowledge related to what constitutes quantitatively relevant increases in mast cell and eosinophil number in tissue specimens for several clinical conditions. Diagnostically relevant thresholds of mast cell and eosinophil numbers have been proposed and generally accepted by the medical community for a few conditions, such as systemic mastocytosis and eosinophilic esophagitis. However, for other mast cell- and eosinophil-associated disorders, broad discrepancies remain regarding diagnostic thresholds and how samples are processed, routinely and/or specially stained, and interpreted and/or reported by pathologists. These discrepancies can obfuscate or delay a patient's correct diagnosis. Therefore, a work group was assembled to review the literature and develop a standardized consensus for assessing the presence of mast cells and eosinophils for a spectrum of clinical conditions, including systemic mastocytosis and cutaneous mastocytosis, mast cell activation syndrome, eosinophilic esophagitis, eosinophilic gastritis/enteritis, and hypereosinophilia/hypereosinophilic syndrome. The intent of this work group is to build a consensus among pathology, allergy, dermatology, hematology/oncology, and gastroenterology stakeholders for qualitatively and quantitatively assessing mast cells and eosinophils in skin, gastrointestinal, and bone marrow pathologic specimens for the benefit of clinical practice and patients.

Treatment of lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES): what to consider after confirming the elusive diagnosis

Lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) is a rare disease driven by immunophenotypically aberrant T cells producing eosinophilopoetic cytokines such as interleukin-5 (IL-5). Treatment is challenging because L-HES is relatively steroid resistant and not amenable to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We searched the literature for clinical trials and observational studies, including case reports, of patients treated for L-HES. In all, 25 studies were selected; two were randomised controlled trials of IL-5 blockade, which included some patients with L-HES, and the rest were observational studies. Corticosteroids are often used as first-line therapy, but patients with L-HES have lower response rates than other types of HES. Treatments that reduce symptoms and steroid dependence in some patients include interferon-alpha (IFN-α), anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, cyclosporine and mycophenolate. These drugs target T-cell activation and proliferation, or IL-5 directly. Although effective, IFN-α and cyclosporine were commonly reported to cause side-effects resulting in discontinuation. Alemtuzumab can induce remissions, but these are generally short lived. The anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies mepolizumab and benralizumab are effective and well tolerated, but with a high rate of relapse once withdrawn. Hydroxyurea, methotrexate, imatinib were unsuccessful in most patients studied. More prospective clinical trials are needed for patients with L-HES.

The causes of a peripheral blood eosinophilia in a secondary care setting

BACKGROUND

A peripheral blood eosinophilia of greater than 1.0 × 10⁹ /L is relatively unusual and offers a clue to the underlying diagnosis. In 2003, we established a specialist service to diagnose unexplained eosinophilia.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the causes of an eosinophilia in our service and the diagnostic algorithm we developed.

METHODS

Subjects were referred by physician colleagues across a range of specialties and undertook standard investigations following a semi-structured protocol. Data were extracted from a bespoke database.

RESULTS

Three hundred and eighty two subjects were referred over a 17-year period. Average age was 54 years and 183 (48%) of subjects were female, with 21 of 25 (84%) females in the idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia group (p < 0001), 22 of 30 (73%) females in the gastrointestinal disease group (p < .008), but 11 of 37 (30%) females in the eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis group (p < .04). A diagnosis was assigned after systematic evaluation using a pre-defined algorithm in 361 (94.5%) of cases. Fungal allergy (82 subjects: 21%), parasitic infection (61 subjects: 16%) and severe eosinophilic asthma (50 subjects: 13%) were the three commonest individual diagnoses. Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) disease including eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) accounted for 85 subjects (20%) of which seven subjects (2%) had myeloproliferative disease (M-HES). A high IgE was common, and 79 (91%) of subjects with complete data who had an IgE of ≥1000 IU/L had fungal allergy or parasite infection. The serum tryptase was raised in 44 of 302 (14.5%) of individuals across all diagnostic groups, though none had mastocytosis.

CONCLUSION

A diagnosis of an unexplained eosinophilia can usually be determined using as semi-structured algorithm. Parasitic infection and fungal allergy often with severe eosinophilic asthma were common causes, whereas HES, particularly myeloproliferative, disease was relatively rare.

Eosinophils and eosinophil-associated disorders: immunological, clinical, and molecular complexity

Eosinophils and their mediators play a crucial role in various reactive states such as bacterial and viral infections, chronic inflammatory disorders, and certain hematologic malignancies. Depending on the underlying pathology, molecular defect(s), and the cytokine- and mediator-cascades involved, peripheral blood and tissue hypereosinophilia (HE) may develop and may lead to organ dysfunction or even organ damage which usually leads to the diagnosis of a HE syndrome (HES). In some of these patients, the etiology and impact of HE remain unclear. These patients are diagnosed with idiopathic HE. In other patients, HES is diagnosed but the etiology remains unknown — these patients are classified as idiopathic HES. For patients with HES, early therapeutic application of agents reducing eosinophil counts is usually effective in avoiding irreversible organ damage. Therefore, it is important to systematically explore various diagnostic markers and to correctly identify the disease elicitors and etiology. Depending on the presence and type of underlying disease, HES are classified into primary (clonal) HES, reactive HES, and idiopathic HES. In most of these patients, effective therapies can be administered. The current article provides an overview of the pathogenesis of eosinophil-associated disorders, with special emphasis on the molecular, immunological, and clinical complexity of HE and HES. In addition, diagnostic criteria and the classification of eosinophil disorders are reviewed in light of new developments in the field.

Physiology and pathology of eosinophils: Recent developments: Summary of the Focus Workshop Organized by DGAKI

Over the last century, eosinophils have been regarded ambiguously either as 'friends' or 'foes'. Recent developments have greatly enhanced our understanding of the role and function of eosinophils in health and disease. Pathogenic eosinophilic inflammation can lead to severe diseases in various organs, such as the gastrointestinal tract, airways, heart and skin. In a 2-day focus workshop of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the state of the art was discussed and practical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of eosinophilic diseases, with a particular focus on new biologics, such as anti-interleukin 5 and anti-interleukin 5R, were derived.

A Young Male With Anorexia, Abdominal Complaints and Marked Blood Eosinophilia

Peripheral blood eosinophilia represents a frequent finding in routine clinical practice when absolute eosinophil count is found to be greater than 0.5 x 109/L (500/µL). Common causes include parasitic infections, allergic reactions, and hyper-eosinophilic syndrome. Eosinophilia secondary to malignancy represents an uncommon presentation.

Here we report an atypical case of a 47-year-old previously healthy male who presented to a primary care setting complaining of fatigue and anorexia for the last two weeks. The evaluation revealed leucocytosis and peripheral hypereosinophilia with an absolute eosinophil count of 14.13×109/L (37%).

Following an extensive diagnostic work in a secondary care centre he was finally diagnosed with rectal carcinoma. This case highlights that solid malignancy should be considered in patients with marked peripheral eosinophilia.

Le N, Steele R. A 79-year-old man with persistent eosinophilia and elevated immunoglobulin E

The differential diagnoses for eosinophilia include allergic, infectious, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases. We presented the case of a 79-year-old man with eosinophilia and elevated immunoglobulin E that persisted despite adequate treatment for possible environmental exposures. Further specialized testing based on his initial workup led to his diagnosis. This case highlights the importance of sequential and targeted testing to evaluate for rare causes of eosinophilia.

Gene Expression Comparison between Sézary Syndrome and Lymphocytic-Variant Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Refines Biomarkers for Sézary Syndrome

Sézary syndrome (SS), an aggressive cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) with poor prognosis, is characterized by the clinical hallmarks of circulating malignant T cells, erythroderma and lymphadenopathy. However, highly variable clinical skin manifestations and similarities with benign mimickers can lead to significant diagnostic delay and inappropriate therapy that can lead to disease progression and mortality. SS has been the focus of numerous transcriptomic-profiling studies to identify sensitive and specific diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers. Benign inflammatory disease controls (e.g., psoriasis, atopic dermatitis) have served to identify chronic inflammatory phenotypes in gene expression profiles, but provide limited insight into the lymphoproliferative and oncogenic roles of abnormal gene expression in SS. This perspective was recently clarified by a transcriptome meta-analysis comparing SS and lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome, a benign yet often clonal T-cell lymphoproliferation, with clinical features similar to SS. Here we review the rationale for selecting lymphocytic-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES) as a disease control for SS, and discuss differentially expressed genes that may distinguish benign from malignant lymphoproliferative phenotypes, including additional context from prior gene expression studies to improve understanding of genes important in SS.

Single-site, five-year experience with human eosinophil isolation by density gradient centrifugation and CD16 immunomagnetic negative separation

OBJECTIVE

Little has been reported regarding the reliability of methods for the purification of human blood eosinophils. We retrospectively reviewed our experience with 350 consecutive eosinophil isolations.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and December 2018, we conducted 350 eosinophil purifications from 83 donors. Absolute eosinophil count (AEC), calculated from hospital complete blood counts when available (n = 289), ranged from 32 to 1352 eosinophils/µL ([Formula: see text]: 179 ± 136/µL). Eosinophil yields ranged from 0.4 to 24.4 million cells per 20 mL of blood drawn ([Formula: see text]: 3.1 ± 1.9 million eosinophils) with > 98% purity. Comparing AEC to actual yield, recovery was 87% ± 29% ([Formula: see text]) and AEC strongly correlated with yield. To explore the reproducibility of yield, a subsequent analysis was limited to those donors drawn ≥ 3 times (N = 35), and there was no difference in the average coefficient of variation for yield between allergic and non-allergic donors. Viability of isolated eosinophils was consistently > 95% and after 24 h of culture did not differ between allergic and non-allergic donors. We conclude that this immunomagnetic separation method for human eosinophil isolation from whole blood is a reliable, reproducible technique for obtaining an average of 87% yield with high purity and viability.

Contributions of Eosinophils to Human Health and Disease

The human eosinophil has long been thought to favorably influence innate mucosal immunity but at times has also been incriminated in disease pathophysiology. Research into eosinophil biology has uncovered a number of interesting contributions by eosinophils to health and disease. However, it appears that not all eosinophils from all species are created equal. It remains unclear, for example, exactly how having eosinophils benefits the human host when helminth infections in the developed world have become scarce. This review focuses on our current state of knowledge as it relates to human eosinophils. When information is lacking, we discuss lessons learned from mouse studies that may or may not directly apply to human biology and disease. It is an exciting time to be an "eosinophilosopher" because the use of biologic agents that selectively target eosinophils provides an unprecedented opportunity to define the contribution of this cell to eosinophil-associated human diseases.

[Differential diagnosis of hypereosinophilia]

Eosinophilia is defined as an elevated absolute number of eosinophilic leukocytes in peripheral blood or tissue. Its absolute number also defines the grade of eosinophilia. The main causes are allergic (including drug side effects) and infectious triggers but malignant and autoimmune diseases can also result in eosinophilia. Severe eosinophilia with the number of eosinophils >5000/µl are mostly caused by myeloproliferative disorders, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis or during tissue migration in parasitic tissue infections. Hypereosinophilic syndrome is defined as eosinophilia with >1500 eosinophils/µl and a duration of more than 6 months by exclusion of parasitic infections, allergies or other causes of tissue eosinophilia with end-organ damage. For the diagnosis of a persistent eosinophilia a detailed medical history and physical examination should be followed by early organ screening, infection diagnostics especially for helminth infections and hematological laboratory analyses including bone marrow investigations.

Next-generation sequencing specifies Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningoencephalitis in infants: Two case reports

RATIONALE

Angiostrongylus cantonensis-induced eosinophilic meningoencephalitis (AEM) in infants is a very rare but fatal disease. Utilization of genetic assay to detect the cerebral parasite plays an important role for the treatment of the infection.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Two infants (<2 years) presented with cough, intermittent fever, mental fatigue, and poor diet.

DIAGNOSIS

The patients were under clinical examination and laboratory test including cardiac ultrasound, chest X-ray, blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell counting, serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) on DNA from CSF. Due to hypereosinophils in patients' peripheral blood and CSF, and abundant DNA sequences from A cantonensis in CSF, the patients were diagnosed with Angiostrongylus eosinophilic meningoencephalitis.

INTERVENTIONS

The patients were treated with albendazole to deworm, and methylprednisolone to reduce inflammation.

OUTCOME

The patients were completely recovered from AEM without relapse after 10-day treatment.

LESSONS

ELISA and MRI are not sufficiently accurate for the diagnosis of AEM in infants. NGS can specify the infection by the cerebral parasite and offers a new effective approach for the early and precise diagnosis of AEM in infants.

Pediatric Hypereosinophilia: Characteristics, Clinical Manifestations, and Diagnoses

BACKGROUND

Eosinophilia is associated with various conditions, including allergic, infectious, and neoplastic disorders. The diagnostic differential is broad, and data on hypereosinophilia in pediatric patients are limited.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to identify cases of hypereosinophilia in a tertiary pediatric medical center, determine clinical characteristics and disease associations, and estimate the incidence of hypereosinophilia in the hospital and geographic populations.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review included patients younger than 18 years presenting to a tertiary pediatric medical center (January 1, 2008, to May 31, 2017) with absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) greater than or equal to 1.50 thousand eosinophils/microliter (K/μL) recorded on at least 2 occasions at least 4 weeks apart (N = 176). Clinical characteristics, laboratory values, treatment course, and associated diagnoses were evaluated.

RESULTS

The most common cause of hypereosinophilia in this cohort was secondary hypereosinophilia. Atopic dermatitis, graft-versus-host disease, sickle cell disease, and parasitic infections were the most common conditions associated with hypereosinophilia. Median age at diagnosis was 4.6 (interquartile range, 1.5-10.5) years. Median peak AEC was 3.16 (2.46-4.78) K/μL. Hypereosinophilia occurred most frequently in patients aged between 6 and 11 years (24.4%) and younger than 1 year (18.2%). Patients with neoplasms and immune deficiencies had significantly higher peak AECs than did patients with overlap hypereosinophilic syndrome and atopic diseases (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric hypereosinophilia has an incidence of 54.4 per 100,000 persons per year, with children younger than 1 year and aged 6 to 11 years accounting for most affected patients. Pediatric hypereosinophilia is not uncommon and remains underrecognized, highlighting a need for clinicians to identify patients who meet criteria for hypereosinophilia and to pursue a thorough evaluation.