Bronchodilator Dose Responsiveness in Children and Adolescents: Clinical Features and Association with Future Asthma Exacerbations

Emergency department discharge practices for children with acute wheeze and asthma: a survey of discharge practice and review of safety netting instructions in the UK and Ireland

OBJECTIVE

Recovery from acute wheeze and asthma attacks should be supported with safety netting, including treatment advice. We evaluated emergency department (ED) discharge practices for acute childhood wheeze/asthma attacks to describe variation in safety netting and recovery bronchodilator dosing.

DESIGN

Two-phase study between June 2020 and September 2021, comprising (1) Departmental discharge practice survey, and (2) Analysis of written discharge instructions for caregivers.

SETTING

Secondary and tertiary EDs in rural and urban settings, from Paediatric Emergency Research in the UK and Ireland (PERUKI).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Describe practice and variation in discharge advice, treatment recommendations and safety netting provision.

RESULTS

Of 66/71 (93%) participating sites, 62/66 (93.9%) reported providing written safety netting information. 52/66 (78.8%) 'nearly always' assessed inhaler/spacer technique; routine medication review (21/66; 31.8%) and adherence (16/66; 21.4%) were less frequent. In phase II, 61/66 (92.4%) submitted their discharge documents; 50/66 (81.9%) included bronchodilator plans. 11/66 (18.0%) provided Personalised Asthma Action Plans as sole discharge information. 45/50 (90%) provided 'fixed' bronchodilator dosing regimes; dose tapering was common (38/50; 76.0%). Median starting dose was 10 puffs 4 hourly (27/50, 54.0%); median duration was 4 days (29/50, 58.0%). 13/61 (21.3%) did not provide bronchodilator advice for acute deterioration; where provided, 42/48 (87.5%) recommended 10 puffs immediately. Subsequent dosages varied considerably. Common red flags included inability to speak (52/61, 85.2%), inhalers not lasting 4 hours (51/61, 83.6%) and respiratory distress (49/61, 80.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is variation in bronchodilator dosing and safety netting content for recovery following acute wheeze and asthma attacks. This reflects a lack of evidence, affirming need for further multicentre studies regarding bronchodilator recovery strategies and optimal safety netting advice.

Recommendations for asthma monitoring in children: A PeARL document endorsed by APAPARI, EAACI, INTERASMA, REG, and WAO

Monitoring is a major component of asthma management in children. Regular monitoring allows for diagnosis confirmation, treatment optimization, and natural history review. Numerous factors that may affect disease activity and patient well-being need to be monitored: response and adherence to treatment, disease control, disease progression, comorbidities, quality of life, medication side-effects, allergen and irritant exposures, diet and more. However, the prioritization of such factors and the selection of relevant assessment tools is an unmet need. Furthermore, rapidly developing technologies promise new opportunities for closer, or even "real-time," monitoring between visits. Following an approach that included needs assessment, evidence appraisal, and Delphi consensus, the PeARL Think Tank, in collaboration with major international professional and patient organizations, has developed a set of 24 recommendations on pediatric asthma monitoring, to support healthcare professionals in decision-making and care pathway design.

Percent Recovery Index Predicts Poor Asthma Control and Exacerbation in Adults

Background

Previous studies indicate that the percent recovery index (PRI: the percentage increase from the maximally reduced FEV1 after bronchodilator inhalation), one of the indexes of methacholine bronchial provocation, may predict acute asthma exacerbations in childhood and elderly asthmatics. It is known that childhood (<12) and elder (>60) asthmatics may be different to adult patients in many aspect including prognosis. However, in adults, a research for predicting value of PRI to exacerbation is still absence. Besides exacerbation, predicting value of PRI to poor asthma control is also unknown. We try to detect whether PRI can predict poor asthma control and exacerbation in adults in this research. Meanwhile, we try to detect whether treatment can influence PRI.

Methods

In 61 adults with asthma, baseline PRI was measured during enrollment. And then baseline PRI was evaluated as a predictor of exacerbation or poor asthma control at an upcoming 3-month follow-up. The covariates included age, sex, BMI, previous exacerbation, smoking status and baseline lung function. After treatment for 3 months, PRI was measured again and compared with baseline PRI.

Results

After the 3-month follow-up, we found that baseline PRI was significantly related to asthma exacerbation (P = 0.023), poor asthma control (ACT at 3 months, P = 0.014), decreased quality of life (decrease of MiniAQLQ, P = 0.010) and cumulative number of EDHO at 3 months (P = 0.039). Meanwhile, no significant correlation was observed between baseline PRI and inflammation factors (FENO, CaNO, and EOS). Finally, PRI was dramatically reduced after standard treatment for 3 months.

Conclusion

PRI is efficient in the prediction of poor asthma control and exacerbation in adults. The predictive value of PRI may rely on the inherent property of asthmatic airway smooth muscle (ASM) independent of inflammation factors. Effective treatment can alleviate PRI dramatically and that indicate PRI may also be valuable in evaluation of curative effect.

Reduced bronchodilator reversibility correlates with non-type 2 high asthma and future exacerbations: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Given that airway obstruction in asthma is not always fully reversible, reduced bronchodilator reversibility (BDR) may be a special asthma phenotype.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the characteristics of BDR^high/low phenotypes (defined using two BDR criteria) and their associations with asthma exacerbations (AEs).

METHODS

After baseline assessments, all patients were classified into BDR^high or BDR^low phenotypes. This study consisted of 2 parts. Part I was a 12-month prospective observational cohort study designed to identify the clinical characteristics and associations with future AEs in BDR^high/low phenotypes (n = 456). Part II, designed as a post hoc analysis of the data obtained in Part I, was conducted to assess the association between BDR^high/low phenotypes and treatment responsiveness (n = 360).

RESULTS

Subjects with BDR^low phenotypes had better baseline asthma symptom control and was negatively associated with eosinophilic asthma and type 2 (T2) high asthma. During the 12-month follow-up, those with BDR^low phenotypes had a higher risk of severe AEs (SAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR_adj = 2.24, 95% CI = [1.25, 3.68]; Ward's criterion: RR_adj = 2.46, 95% CI = [1.40, 4.00]) and moderate-to-severe AEs (MSAEs) (guideline-based criterion: RR_adj = 1.83, 95% CI = [1.22, 2.56]; Ward's criterion: RR_adj = 1.94, 95% CI = [1.32, 2.68]) in the following year according to logistic regression models. Similar findings were obtained with negative binominal regression models. BDR^low phenotype was a risk factor for an insensitive response to anti-asthma treatment (guideline-based criterion: OR_adj = 1.96, 95% CI = [1.05, 3.65]; Ward's criterion: OR_adj = 2.01, 95% CI = [1.12, 3.58]).

CONCLUSION

We identified that BDR^low phenotype was associated with non-T2 high asthma and future AEs. These findings have clinically relevant implications for asthma management.

Eosinophil-derived neurotoxin: An asthma exacerbation biomarker in children

Background: Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, characterized by chronic airway inflammation. Asthma exacerbations (AE) are episodes characterized by a progressive increase in symptoms of shortness of breath, cough, wheezing, or chest tightness with a decrease in lung function. There have been previous studies that examined the role of eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) in asthma, but there have been no studies of the role of EDN in children experiencing AE. Objective: In this study, we aimed to examine the association of EDN with lung function and prognosis in children admitted for severe AE. Methods: We enrolled 82 children who were admitted for severe AE at two different university hospitals in South Korea between January 2018 and December 2019. Blood tests, including white blood cell count, myeloperoxidase (MPO), total eosinophil count, EDN, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and interleukin (IL) 4, IL-5, IL-10 values, and lung function were measured on admission and at discharge in each patient. Results: We observed significant decreases in the levels of MPO, EDN, CRP, and IL-4, with significant improvement in lung function after treatment. We then classified the subjects into two groups of different clinical phenotypes: eosinophilic asthma exacerbation (EAE) group and non-EAE group. EDN levels were higher and lung functions were lower in the EAE group. Also, we found that the EDN level was a significant biomarker useful for predicting the number of days for hospital stay. Conclusion: We found that EDN can act as a biomarker that reflects lung function, and that EDN could act as a prognostic biomarker, which demonstrated the complex role of EDN in children experiencing AE.

Treatment response among asthmatic patients with and without reversible airflow limitations

Objectives

Asthma is a chronic airway disorder associated with variable airflow limitations, which are triggered by different stimuli. The reversibility of airflow limitations reflects patients' responses to the therapy with bronchodilators and improvements in airflow. This study aims to determine the treatment outcomes (improvements in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and the number of asthma exacerbations) associated with the presence of airflow reversibility.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included 154 adults (>18 years) who were diagnosed with asthma and had pulmonary function testing (PFT) at a tertiary care centre in KSA between January 1st, 2014 and May 31st, 2019. Smokers and patients with comorbidities or medications that could affect PFT were excluded from the analysis. Patients were classified as having a reversible airflow limitation when they exhibited a post-bronchodilator FEV1 increase of 12% and 200 mL. Exacerbations were defined as the need to use oral corticosteroids. Chi-square tests were used for comparative analyses.

Results

From our cohort, 42 patients exhibited reversibility. In contrast, 112 patients did not show any sign of reversibility. Asthmatics with baseline reversible airflow limitations experienced significant worsening of FEV1 during the follow-up period compared with those with no reversibility, showing a mean difference of 19.96 mL (p = 0.0206). There was no significant association between asthma reversibility and exacerbations (p = 0.23).

Conclusion

In our study, during the follow-up of patients with asthma, we found that the reversibility of airflow was associated with significantly worse FEV1, although this did not have a significant effect on exacerbations. Therefore, we recommend regular spirometry follow-ups, particularly for patients with significant airway reversibility.