1
|
Basagaña M, Martínez-Rivera C, Padró C, Garcia-Olivé I, Martínez-Colls M, Navarro J, Pardo L, Cruz P, Cardona Peitx G, Carabias L, Roger A, Abad J, Rosell A. Clinical characteristics of complete responders versus non-complete responders to omalizumab, benralizumab and mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma: a long-term retrospective analysis. Ann Med 2024; 56:2317356. [PMID: 38364218 PMCID: PMC10878334 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2317356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some patients with severe asthma may benefit from treatment with biologics, but evidence has been mostly collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which patients' characteristics are different from those encountered in asthma patients in the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of complete responders versus non-complete responders to long-term treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma attended in routine daily practice. METHODS Data of a cohort of 90 patients with severe asthma who were treated with biologics (omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for at least 12 months and were followed up to March 2022. Data recorded included clinical characteristics and effectiveness of treatment (exacerbation, Asthma Control Test [ACT] score, lung function, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), FeNO, and blood eosinophils at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. Complete response is considered if, in addition to not presenting exacerbations or the use of mOCS, the ACT score was >20 and, the FEV1 >80% predicted. RESULTS An improvement in all asthma control parameters was observed after 12 months of treatment and a mean follow-up of 55 months. After 12 months of treatment 27.2% of patients met the criteria of complete response and this percentage even increased to 35.3% at the end of follow-up. Long-term complete response was associated to better lung function with mepolizumab and omalizumab treatment and to less previous exacerbations in the benralizumab group. The main cause of not achieving a complete response was the persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe asthma in a clinic environment with similar effect sizes to RCTs in the long term follow-up. Airflow obstruction, however, was a predictor of a non-complete response to biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Basagaña
- Allergy Section, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Martínez-Rivera
- Pneumology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Clara Padró
- Allergy Section, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ignasi Garcia-Olivé
- Pneumology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mimar Martínez-Colls
- Pediatric Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Navarro
- Pediatric Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Laura Pardo
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paula Cruz
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Gloria Cardona Peitx
- Pharmacy Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lídia Carabias
- Pharmacy Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Albert Roger
- Allergy Section, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jorge Abad
- Pneumology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antoni Rosell
- Pneumology Department, Severe Asthma Unit, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Álvarez-Gutiérrez FJ, Casas-Maldonado F, Soto-Campos G, Blanco-Aparicio M, Delgado J, Galo AP, Quirce S, Plaza V. Spanish Consensus on Remission in Asthma (REMAS). Arch Bronconeumol 2024; 60:503-509. [PMID: 38697903 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
The concept of "remission" in asthma has been around for a long time and it has been a controversial topic. Despite the attempts of some studies to characterize this entity, the discussion continues. In the case of asthma there is still no clear definition, either in terms of its meaning or the parameters that should be included or whether it should be divided into clinical or complete remission. To help defining these controversial concepts, SEPAR has advocated the multidisciplinary working group REMAS (REMission in ASthma). Following the Delphi methodology and with the involvement of more than 120 specialists in asthma management, this group has arrived at a consensus on the definitions of remission in asthma and establishing the criteria and characteristics that will be of use in future studies evaluating the efficacy or effectiveness of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Gregorio Soto-Campos
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Neumología y Alergia, Hospital Universitario de Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | - Julio Delgado
- Unidad de Gestión Clínica de Alergología, Hospital Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | - Santiago Quirce
- Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vicente Plaza
- Servicio de Neumología y Alergia, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chiner E, Murcia M, Boira I, Bernabeu MÁ, Esteban V, Martínez-Moragón E. Real-Life Clinical Outcomes of Benralizumab Treatment in Patients with Uncontrolled Severe Asthma and Coexisting Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyposis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4247. [PMID: 39064286 PMCID: PMC11278437 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13144247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to evaluate, the clinical benefit of benralizumab in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Methods: The study included patients with uncontrolled severe asthma associated with CRSwNP who started therapy with benralizumab. Pulmonary function, eosinophilia, IgE, comorbidity, changes in the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Quality of Life (AQLQ), VAS (obstruction, drip, anosmia, facial pressure), SNOT-22, decrease or withdrawal of steroids and other medication, hospital admissions and emergency visits were analysed. The FEOS scale and EXACTO were employed in the assessment of response. Results: We analyzed 58 patients who completed minimal treatment at 12 months. After treatment with benralizumab, exacerbations were reduced by 82% (p < 0.001), steroid cycles by 84% (p < 0.001), emergencies visit by 83% p < 0.001) and admissions by 76% (p < 0.001), improving all the scales for asthma control, (p < 0.001). In terms of lung function, differences were observed in FVC% (p < 0.001), FEV1% (p < 0.001), and FEV1/FVC% (69.5 ± 10 vs. 74 ± 10, p < 0.001). In relation to CRSwNP, differences were observed in SNOT-22 (54.66 ± 17 vs. 20.24 ± 9, p < 0.001), VAS obstruction (7.91 ± 1 vs. 1.36 ± 1, p < 0. 001), VAS drip (7.76 ± 1 vs. 1.38 ± 1, p < 0.001), VAS anosmia (7.66 ± 1 vs. 1.38 ± 1, p < 0.001) and VAS facial pressure (7.91 ± 1 vs. 1.22 ± 1, p < 0.001). The mean FEOS score after treatment was 73 ± 14. A complete response/super response was achieved in 33 patients (57%), good response in 16 (28%) and partial response in 9 (15%). Conclusions: The administration of benralizumab to patients with uncontrolled severe asthma associated with CRSwNP has been demonstrated to improve nasal symptoms, asthma control and lung function. This resulted in a reduction in the need for oral steroids, maintenance and rescue medication, emergency room visits, and hospital admissions, with 57% of patients achieving the clinical remission criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eusebi Chiner
- Pulmonology Department, University Hospital of Saint John of Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (E.C.); (M.M.); (V.E.)
| | - María Murcia
- Pulmonology Department, University Hospital of Saint John of Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (E.C.); (M.M.); (V.E.)
| | - Ignacio Boira
- Pulmonology Department, University Hospital of Saint John of Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (E.C.); (M.M.); (V.E.)
| | - María Ángeles Bernabeu
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospital of Saint John of Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain;
| | - Violeta Esteban
- Pulmonology Department, University Hospital of Saint John of Alicante, 03550 Alicante, Spain; (E.C.); (M.M.); (V.E.)
| | - Eva Martínez-Moragón
- Pulmonology Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, 46017 Valencia, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Denton E, Hew M, Peters MJ, Upham JW, Bulathsinhala L, Tran TN, Martin N, Bergeron C, Al-Ahmad M, Altraja A, Larenas-Linnemann D, Murray R, Celis-Preciado CA, Al-Lehebi R, Belhassen M, Bhutani M, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Bourdin A, Brusselle GG, Busby J, Canonica GW, Heffler E, Chapman KR, Charriot J, Christoff GC, Chung LP, Cosio BG, Côté A, Costello RW, Cushen B, Fingleton J, Fonseca JA, Gibson PG, Heaney LG, Huang EWC, Iwanaga T, Jackson DJ, Koh MS, Lehtimäki L, Máspero J, Mahboub B, Menzies-Gow AN, Mitchell PD, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Perez-de-Llano L, Perng DW, Pfeffer PE, Popov TA, Porsbjerg CM, Rhee CK, Roche N, Sadatsafavi M, Salvi S, Schmid JM, Sheu CC, Sirena C, Torres-Duque CA, Salameh L, Patel PH, Ulrik CS, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Price DB. Real-world biologics response and super-response in the International Severe Asthma Registry cohort. Allergy 2024. [PMID: 38923444 DOI: 10.1111/all.16178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic asthma therapies reduce exacerbations and long-term oral corticosteroids (LTOCS) use in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); however, there are limited data on outcomes among patients ineligible for RCTs. Hence, we investigated responsiveness to biologics in a real-world population of adults with severe asthma. METHODS Adults in the International Severe Asthma Registry (ISAR) with ≥24 weeks of follow-up were grouped into those who did, or did not, initiate biologics (anti-IgE, anti-IL5/IL5R, anti-IL4/13). Treatment responses were examined across four domains: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) increase by ≥100 mL, improved asthma control, annualized exacerbation rate (AER) reduction ≥50%, and any LTOCS dose reduction. Super-response criteria were: FEV1 increase by ≥500 mL, new well-controlled asthma, no exacerbations, and LTOCS cessation or tapering to ≤5 mg/day. RESULTS 5.3% of ISAR patients met basic RCT inclusion criteria; 2116/8451 started biologics. Biologic initiators had worse baseline impairment than non-initiators, despite having similar biomarker levels. Half or more of initiators had treatment responses: 59% AER reduction, 54% FEV1 increase, 49% improved control, 49% reduced LTOCS, of which 32%, 19%, 30%, and 39%, respectively, were super-responses. Responses/super-responses were more frequent in biologic initiators than in non-initiators; nevertheless, ~40-50% of initiators did not meet response criteria. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with severe asthma are ineligible for RCTs of biologic therapies. Biologics are initiated in patients who have worse baseline impairments than non-initiators despite similar biomarker levels. Although biologic initiators exhibited clinical responses and super-responses in all outcome domains, 40-50% did not meet the response criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Denton
- Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Matthew J Peters
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Concord Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - John W Upham
- Frazer Institute & PA-Southside Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lakmini Bulathsinhala
- Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Trung N Tran
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
| | - Neil Martin
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Celine Bergeron
- Centre for Lung Health, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait
- Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Alan Altraja
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Tartu and Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | | | - Carlos Andrés Celis-Preciado
- Pulmonary Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia
- Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Riyad Al-Lehebi
- Department of Pulmonology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | | | - Mohit Bhutani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sinthia Z Bosnic-Anticevich
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Guy G Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Epidemiology and Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John Busby
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | | - Jérémy Charriot
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Li Ping Chung
- Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Borja G Cosio
- Son Espases University Hospital-IdISBa-Ciberes, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Andréanne Côté
- Department of Medicine, Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
| | - Richard W Costello
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Clinical Research Centre, Smurfit Building Beaumont Hospital, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Breda Cushen
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - James Fingleton
- Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - João A Fonseca
- CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Peter G Gibson
- Australian Severe Asthma Network, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Erick Wan-Chun Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | - David J Jackson
- Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Mariko Siyue Koh
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jorge Máspero
- Clinical Research for Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, CIDEA Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- University Career of Specialists in Allergy and Clinical Immunology at the Buenos Aires University School of Medicine, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Bassam Mahboub
- Rashid hospital, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Andrew N Menzies-Gow
- AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
- Lung Division, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andriana I Papaioannou
- 2nd Respiratory Medicine Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Luis Perez-de-Llano
- Pneumology Service, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo, Spain
| | - Diahn-Warng Perng
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Paul E Pfeffer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Todor A Popov
- University Hospital St. Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Celeste M Porsbjerg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Research Unit, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Chin Kook Rhee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nicolas Roche
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, APHP-Centre University Paris Cité, Cochin Hospital and Institute (UMR1016), Paris, France
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sundeep Salvi
- Pulmocare Research and Education Foundation, Pune, India
| | | | - Chau-Chyun Sheu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | - Carlos A Torres-Duque
- CINEUMO, Respiratory Research Center, Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia
- Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia
| | - Laila Salameh
- Rashid hospital, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates
| | - Pujan H Patel
- Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Eileen Wang
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Michael E Wechsler
- Department of Medicine, NJH Cohen Family Asthma Institute, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - David B Price
- Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, UK
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scelo G, Tran TN, Le TT, Fagerås M, Dorscheid D, Busby J, Al-Ahmad M, Al-Lehebi R, Altraja A, Beastall A, Bergeron C, Bjermer L, Bjerrum AS, Cano-Rosales DJ, Canonica GW, Carter V, Charriot J, Christoff GC, Cosio BG, Denton E, Fernandez-Sanchez MJ, Fonseca JA, Gibson PG, Goh C, Heaney LG, Heffler E, Hew M, Iwanaga T, Katial R, Koh MS, Kuna P, Larenas-Linnemann D, Lehtimäki L, Mahboub B, Martin N, Matsumoto H, Menzies-Gow AN, Papadopoulos NG, Patel P, Perez-De-Llano L, Peters M, Pfeffer PE, Popov TA, Porsbjerg CM, Rhee CK, Sadatsafavi M, Taillé C, Torres-Duque CA, Tsai MJ, Ulrik CS, Upham JW, von Bülow A, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Price DB. Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Response to Biologics for Severe Asthma. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024:S2213-2198(24)00530-0. [PMID: 38768896 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biologic effectiveness is often assessed as response, a term that eludes consistent definition. Identifying those most likely to respond in real-life has proven challenging. OBJECTIVE To explore definitions of biologic responders in adults with severe asthma and investigate patient characteristics associated with biologic response. METHODS This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 21 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry. Changes in four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year period before and after biologic initiation in patients with a predefined level of prebiologic impairment. Responder cutoffs were 50% or greater reduction in exacerbation rate, 50% or greater reduction in long-term oral corticosteroid daily dose, improvement in one or more category in asthma control, and 100 mL or greater improvement in FEV1. Responders were defined using single and multiple domains. The association between prebiologic characteristics and postbiologic initiation response was examined by multivariable analysis. RESULTS A total of 2,210 patients were included. Responder rate ranged from 80.7% (n = 566 of 701) for exacerbation response to 10.6% (n = 9 of 85) for a four-domain response. Many responders still exhibited significant impairment after biologic initiation: 46.7% (n = 206 of 441) of asthma control responders with uncontrolled asthma before the biologic still had incompletely controlled disease postbiologic initiation. Predictors of response were outcome-dependent. Lung function responders were more likely to have higher prebiologic FeNO (odds ratio = 1.20 for every 25-parts per billion increase), and shorter asthma duration (odds ratio = 0.81 for every 10-year increase in duration). Higher blood eosinophil count and the presence of type 2-related comorbidities were positively associated with higher odds of meeting long-term oral corticosteroid, control, and lung function responder criteria. CONCLUSIONS Our findings underscore the multimodal nature of response, showing that many responders experience residual symptoms after biologic initiation and that predictors of response vary according to the outcome assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghislaine Scelo
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Trung N Tran
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md
| | - Tham T Le
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md
| | - Malin Fagerås
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Md; BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Delbert Dorscheid
- Center for Heart Lung Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - John Busby
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, College of Medicine, Kuwait University Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait
| | - Riyad Al-Lehebi
- Department of Pulmonology, King Fahad Medical City Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Alan Altraja
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Tartu and Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Celine Bergeron
- Centre for Lung Health, Vancouver General Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Leif Bjermer
- Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anne S Bjerrum
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Victoria Carter
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Charriot
- PhyMedExp, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Borja G Cosio
- Son Espases University Hospital, IdISBa-Ciberes, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Eve Denton
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maria Jose Fernandez-Sanchez
- Pulmonary Unit, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogotá, Colombia; Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - João A Fonseca
- CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Peter G Gibson
- Australian Severe Asthma Network, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Celine Goh
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Takashi Iwanaga
- Center for General Medical Education and Clinical Training, Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Rohit Katial
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | - Mariko S Koh
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | | | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Bassam Mahboub
- Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Neil Martin
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Hisako Matsumoto
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, and Allergology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | | | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Centre for Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Division of Infection, Immunity, and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Pujan Patel
- Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Luis Perez-De-Llano
- Pneumology Service. Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo, Spain
| | - Matthew Peters
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Concord Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul E Pfeffer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, Barts and London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Todor A Popov
- Clinic of Allergy and Asthma, University Hospital Sv. Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Celeste M Porsbjerg
- Bispebjerg Hospital, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Research Unit, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Chin K Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Camille Taillé
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Bichat Hospital, AP-HP Nord-Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Carlos A Torres-Duque
- CINEUMO, Respiratory Research Center, Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Ming-Ju Tsai
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Charlotte S Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - John W Upham
- Frazer Institute & PA-Southside Clinical Unit, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Anna von Bülow
- Respiratory Research Unit-Hvidovre, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eileen Wang
- National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver and Aurora, Colo
| | - Michael E Wechsler
- National Jewish Health Cohen Family Asthma Institute, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colo
| | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Perez-de-Llano L, Scelo G, Canonica GW, Chen W, Henley W, Larenas-Linnemann D, Peters MJ, Pfeffer PE, Tran TN, Ulrik CS, Popov TA, Sadatsafavi M, Hew M, Máspero J, Gibson PG, Christoff GC, Fitzgerald JM, Torres-Duque CA, Porsbjerg CM, Papadopoulos NG, Papaioannou AI, Heffler E, Iwanaga T, Al-Ahmad M, Kuna P, Fonseca JA, Al-Lehebi R, Rhee CK, Koh MS, Cosio BG, Perng Steve DW, Mahboub B, Menzies-Gow AN, Jackson DJ, Busby J, Heaney LG, Patel PH, Wang E, Wechsler ME, Altraja A, Lehtimäki L, Bourdin A, Bjermer L, Bulathsinhala L, Carter V, Murray R, Beastall A, Denton E, Price DB. Impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in patients with severe asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2024; 132:610-622.e7. [PMID: 38151100 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little agreement on clinically useful criteria for identifying real-world responders to biologic treatments for asthma. OBJECTIVE To investigate the impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in adults with severe asthma. METHODS This was a longitudinal, cohort study across 22 countries participating in the International Severe Asthma Registry (https://isaregistries.org/) between May 2017 and January 2023. Change in 4 asthma domains (exacerbation rate, asthma control, long-term oral corticosteroid [LTOCS] dose, and lung function) was assessed from biologic initiation to 1 year post-treatment (minimum 24 weeks). Pre- to post-biologic changes for responders and nonresponders were described along a categorical gradient for each domain derived from pre-biologic distributions (exacerbation rate: 0 to 6+/y; asthma control: well controlled to uncontrolled; LTOCS: 0 to >30 mg/d; percent-predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [ppFEV1]: <50% to ≥80%). RESULTS Percentage of biologic responders (ie, those with a category improvement pre- to post-biologic) varied by domain and increased with greater pre-biologic impairment, increasing from 70.2% to 90.0% for exacerbation rate, 46.3% to 52.3% for asthma control, 31.1% to 58.5% for LTOCS daily dose, and 35.8% to 50.6% for ppFEV1. The proportion of patients having improvement post-biologic tended to be greater for anti-IL-5/5R compared with for anti-IgE for exacerbation, asthma control, and ppFEV1 domains, irrespective of pre-biologic impairment. CONCLUSION Our results provide realistic outcome-specific post-biologic expectations for both physicians and patients, will be foundational to inform future work on a multidimensional approach to define and assess biologic responders and response, and may enhance appropriate patient selection for biologic therapies. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ISAR database has ethical approval from the Anonymous Data Ethics Protocols and Transparency (ADEPT) committee (ADEPT0218) and is registered with the European Union Electronic Register of Post-Authorization studies (ENCEPP/DSPP/23720). The study was designed, implemented, and reported in compliance with the European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP) Code of Conduct (EUPAS38288) and with all applicable local and international laws and regulation, and registered with ENCEPP (https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=38289). Governance was provided by ADEPT (registration number: ADEPT1220).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Perez-de-Llano
- Pneumology Service, Lucus Augusti University Hospital, EOXI Lugo, Monforte, Cervo, Spain
| | - Ghislaine Scelo
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - G Walter Canonica
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Wenjia Chen
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - William Henley
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Health Statistics Group, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | | | - Matthew J Peters
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, Concord Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul E Pfeffer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom; Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Trung N Tran
- BioPharmaceuticals Medical, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, Maryland
| | - Charlotte Suppli Ulrik
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Todor A Popov
- University Hospital Sv. Ivan Rilski, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mark Hew
- Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jorge Máspero
- Clinical Research for Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, CIDEA Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina; University Career of Specialists in Allergy and Clinical Immunology at the Buenos Aires University School of Medicine, Argentina
| | - Peter G Gibson
- Australian Severe Asthma Network, Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, Australia
| | | | - J Mark Fitzgerald
- Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Carlos A Torres-Duque
- CINEUMO, Respiratory Research Center, Fundación Neumológica Colombiana, Bogotá, Colombia; Universidad de La Sabana, Chia, Colombia
| | - Celeste M Porsbjerg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Research Unit, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolaos G Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection, Immunity & Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom; Allergy Department, 2nd Pediatric Clinic, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Andriana I Papaioannou
- 2nd Respiratory Medicine Department, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Enrico Heffler
- Personalized Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | | | - Mona Al-Ahmad
- Microbiology Department, College of Medicine, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait; Al-Rashed Allergy Center, Ministry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | - Piotr Kuna
- Division of Internal Medicine Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - João A Fonseca
- CINTESIS@RISE, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Riyad Al-Lehebi
- Department of Pulmonology, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Chin Kook Rhee
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mariko Siyue Koh
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Borja G Cosio
- Son Espases University Hospital-IdISBa-Ciberes, Mallorca, Spain
| | - Diahn-Warng Perng Steve
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Chest Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bassam Mahboub
- Rashid Hospital, Dubai Health Authority (DHA), Dubai, United Arab Emirates
| | - Andrew N Menzies-Gow
- AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Lung Division, Royal Brompton & Harefield Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Jackson
- Guy's Severe Asthma Centre, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John Busby
- Centre for Public Health, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Liam G Heaney
- Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
| | - Pujan H Patel
- Respiratory Medicine, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Eileen Wang
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver and Aurora, Colorado
| | - Michael E Wechsler
- NJH Cohen Family Asthma Institute, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado
| | - Alan Altraja
- Department of Pulmonology, University of Tartu and Lung Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lauri Lehtimäki
- Allergy Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Leif Bjermer
- Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Lakmini Bulathsinhala
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Victoria Carter
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Ruth Murray
- Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron Beastall
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eve Denton
- Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Optimum Patient Care Global, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Division of Applied Health Sciences, Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jiménez-Gómez M, Díaz-Campos RM, Gimeno-Díaz-De-Atauri Á, Fernández-Rodríguez C, Fernández-Crespo J, García-Moguel I. Early response to Tezepelumab in type-2 severe asthma patients non-responders to other biological treatments: a real-life study. J Asthma 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38686823 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2024.2349605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios.OBJECTIVE. We sought investigate Tezepelumab's response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs.METHODS. Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs.RESULTS. Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab's potential in real-world settings.CONCLUSION. In real-world scenarios, despite the study's limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab's promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rocío Magdalena Díaz-Campos
- Department of Pulmonology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid (Spain)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid (Spain)
| | - Álvaro Gimeno-Díaz-De-Atauri
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid (Spain)
- Department of Paediatric Pulmonology. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid (Spain)
| | - Consuelo Fernández-Rodríguez
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid (Spain)
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid (Spain)
| | - Jesús Fernández-Crespo
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid (Spain)
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid (Spain)
| | - Ismael García-Moguel
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid (Spain)
- Department of Allergy, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre. Madrid (Spain)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pinedo Sierra C, Curto Sánchez E, Diaz Campos R, Hermida Valverde T, Sánchez-Cuellar S, Fernández Tena A. [Asthma]. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2024; 6:100324. [PMID: 38707659 PMCID: PMC11067451 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2024.100324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects about 5% of the world's population and generates high health and social costs. Proper management of the disease requires a correct diagnosis, based on objective measures of functional impairment, as well as symptom control and assessment of the future risk of exacerbations.It has been estimated that 18% of asthma patients in Western Europe have severe asthma and approximately 50% of them have poor control. The severity of asthma is established based on the minimum maintenance treatment needs to achieve control. Asthma clinical practice guidelines recommend classifying severe patients into allergic asthma (T2); eosinophilic asthma (T2) and non-T2 asthma in order to establish the most appropriate treatment.In recent decades, new biological therapies have been developed that can be applied according to the phenotype and endotype of asthma, allowing for selective and personalized treatment. These phenotypes and endotypes can change over time and therefore, the identification of biomarkers capable of predicting the severity, the course of the disease and the response to a given treatment seems essential. A large number of biomarkers have been studied in asthma, but so far only a few can be readily used in routine clinical practice. The application of omics technologies (epigenomics, genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, lipidomics, etc.) for this purpose is still in the research phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Pinedo Sierra
- Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario Clínico San Carlos. Universidad Complutense, Madrid, España
| | - Elena Curto Sánchez
- Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, España
| | - Rocio Diaz Campos
- U. de Asma Grave de Alta Complejidad. Servicio de Neumología. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | | | | | - Ana Fernández Tena
- Servicio de Neumología Ocupacional. Instituto Nacional de Silicosis, Oviedo, España
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pham DD, Lee JH, Kwon HS, Song WJ, Cho YS, Kim H, Kwon JW, Park SY, Kim S, Hur GY, Kim BK, Nam YH, Yang MS, Kim MY, Kim SH, Lee BJ, Lee T, Park SY, Kim MH, Cho YJ, Park C, Jung JW, Park HK, Kim JH, Moon JY, Bhavsar P, Adcock I, Chung KF, Kim TB. Predictors of Early and Late Lung Function Improvement in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma on Type2-Biologics in the PRISM Study. Lung 2024; 202:41-51. [PMID: 38252134 DOI: 10.1007/s00408-024-00670-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The determinants linked to the short- and long-term improvement in lung function in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) on biological treatment (BioT) remain elusive. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify the predictors of early and late lung function improvement in patients with SEA after BioT. METHODS 140 adult patients with SEA who received mepolizumab, dupilumab, or reslizumab were followed up for 6 months to evaluate improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Logistic regression was used to determine the association between potential prognostic factors and improved lung function at 1 and 6 months of treatment. RESULTS More than a third of patients with SEA using BioT showed early and sustained improvements in FEV1 after 1 month. A significant association was found between low baseline FEV1 and high blood eosinophil count and sustained FEV1 improvement after 1 month (0.54 [0.37-0.79] and 1.88 [1.28-2.97] odds ratios and 95% confidence interval, respectively). Meanwhile, among patients who did not experience FEV1 improvement after 1 month, 39% exhibited improvement at 6 months follow-up. A high ACT score measured at this visit was the most reliable predictor of late response after 6 months of treatment (OR and 95% CI 1.75 [1.09-2.98]). CONCLUSION Factors predicting the efficacy of biological agents that improve lung function in SEA vary according to the stage of response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duong Duc Pham
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Ji-Hyang Lee
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hyouk-Soo Kwon
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Woo-Jung Song
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - You Sook Cho
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Hyunkyoung Kim
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Jae-Woo Kwon
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - So-Young Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Sujeong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Gyu Young Hur
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Keun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Hee Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Min-Suk Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Yeong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Sae-Hoon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Byung-Jae Lee
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Taehoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - So-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min-Hye Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Joo Cho
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - ChanSun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Jae-Woo Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han Ki Park
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Joo-Hee Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Korea
| | - Ji-Yong Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Pankaj Bhavsar
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Ian Adcock
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Kian Fan Chung
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Tae-Bum Kim
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valverde-Monge M, Sánchez-Carrasco P, Betancor D, Barroso B, Rodrigo-Muñoz JM, Mahillo-Fernández I, Arismendi E, Bobolea I, Cárdaba B, Cruz MJ, Del Pozo V, Domínguez-Ortega J, González-Barcala FJ, Olaguibel JM, Luna-Porta JA, Martínez-Rivera C, Mullol J, Muñoz X, Peleteiro-Pedraza L, Picado Valles C, Plaza V, Quirce S, Rial MJ, Soto-Retes L, Valero A, Sastre J. Comparison of Long-term Response and Remission to Omalizumab and Anti-IL-5/IL-5R Using Different Criteria in a Real-life Cohort of Severe Asthma Patients. Arch Bronconeumol 2024; 60:23-32. [PMID: 38042707 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2023.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of biologic therapy response is vital to monitor its effectiveness. Authors have proposed various response criteria including good responder, super-responder, non-responder, and clinical remission. OBJECTIVES To ascertain the prevalence of response and clinical remission after long-term treatment (>6 months) of anti-IgE and anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics, compare these results with existing criteria, and identify predictors for non-responders and clinical remission. METHODS A multicenter, real-life study involving severe asthma patients in Spain. Various outcomes were assessed to gauge response and clinical remission against established criteria. RESULTS The study included 429 patients, 209 (48.7%) omalizumab, 112 (26.1%) mepolizumab, 19 (4.4%) reslizumab and 89 (20.7%) benralizumab, with a mean treatment duration of 55.3±38.8 months. In the final year of treatment, 218 (50.8%) were super-responders, 173 (40.3%) responders, 38 (8.9%) non-responders, and clinical remission in 116 (27%), without differences among biologics. The short-term non-responders (<6 months) were 25/545 (4.6%). Substantial variations in response and clinical remission were observed when applying different published criteria. Predictors of non-response included higher BMI (OR:1.14; 95% CI:1.06-1.23; p<0.001), admissions at ICU (2.69; 1.30-5.56; p=0.01), high count of SAE (1.21; 1.03-1.42; p=0.02) before biologic treatment. High FEV1% (0.96; 0.95-0.98; p<0.001), a high ACT score (0.93; 0.88-0.99; p=0.01) before biologic treatment or NSAID-ERD (0.52; 0.29-0.91; p=0.02) showed strong associations with achieving clinical remission. CONCLUSION A substantial proportion of severe asthma patients treated long-term with omalizumab or anti-IL5/IL-5Rα achieved a good response. Differences in response criteria highlight the need for harmonization in defining response and clinical remission in biologic therapy to enable meaningful cross-study comparisons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcela Valverde-Monge
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain.
| | | | - Diana Betancor
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Blanca Barroso
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - José Manuel Rodrigo-Muñoz
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Immunology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ignacio Mahillo-Fernández
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ebymar Arismendi
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Unit & Severe Asthma Unit, Pneumonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Irina Bobolea
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Unit & Severe Asthma Unit, Pneumonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Blanca Cárdaba
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Immunology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - María Jesús Cruz
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Cellular Biology, Physiology and Immunology Department, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Victoria Del Pozo
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain; Immunology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Domínguez-Ortega
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Javier González-Barcala
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
| | - José María Olaguibel
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Juan Alberto Luna-Porta
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Martínez-Rivera
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Institut d'Investigació Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Rhinology Unit & Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical and Experimental Respiratory Immunoallergy (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Muñoz
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology Department, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Peleteiro-Pedraza
- Pneumology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, La Coruña, Spain
| | - Cesar Picado Valles
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Unit & Severe Asthma Unit, Pneumonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Vicente Plaza
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology and Allergy Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Autónoma, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Santiago Quirce
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Manuel Jorge Rial
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Lorena Soto-Retes
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Pneumology and Allergy Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Autónoma, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonio Valero
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Allergy Unit & Severe Asthma Unit, Pneumonology and Allergy Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joaquín Sastre
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain; Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rogers L, Jesenak M, Bjermer L, Hanania NA, Seys SF, Diamant Z. Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient. Respir Med 2023; 218:107414. [PMID: 37776915 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rogers
- Mount Sinai National Jewish Health Respiratory Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
| | - Milos Jesenak
- Department of Pediatrics, Department of Pulmonology and Phthisiology, Department of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, University Teaching Hospital in Martin, Martin, Slovakia
| | - Leif Bjermer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Nicola A Hanania
- Section of Pulmonary /Critical Care/Sleep Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Zuzana Diamant
- Department Clin Pharm & Pharmacol, Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands; Department of Microbiology Immunology & Transplantation, KU Leuven, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium; Department of Respiratory Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Respiratory Medicine & Allergology, Institute for Clinical Science, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Plaza Moral V, Alobid I, Álvarez Rodríguez C, Blanco Aparicio M, Ferreira J, García G, Gómez-Outes A, Garín Escrivá N, Gómez Ruiz F, Hidalgo Requena A, Korta Murua J, Molina París J, Pellegrini Belinchón FJ, Plaza Zamora J, Praena Crespo M, Quirce Gancedo S, Sanz Ortega J, Soto Campos JG. GEMA 5.3. Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2023; 5:100277. [PMID: 37886027 PMCID: PMC10598226 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2023.100277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
The Spanish Guideline on the Management of Asthma, better known by its acronym in Spanish GEMA, has been available for more than 20 years. Twenty-one scientific societies or related groups both from Spain and internationally have participated in the preparation and development of the updated edition of GEMA, which in fact has been currently positioned as the reference guide on asthma in the Spanish language worldwide. Its objective is to prevent and improve the clinical situation of people with asthma by increasing the knowledge of healthcare professionals involved in their care. Its purpose is to convert scientific evidence into simple and easy-to-follow practical recommendations. Therefore, it is not a monograph that brings together all the scientific knowledge about the disease, but rather a brief document with the essentials, designed to be applied quickly in routine clinical practice. The guidelines are necessarily multidisciplinary, developed to be useful and an indispensable tool for physicians of different specialties, as well as nurses and pharmacists. Probably the most outstanding aspects of the guide are the recommendations to: establish the diagnosis of asthma using a sequential algorithm based on objective diagnostic tests; the follow-up of patients, preferably based on the strategy of achieving and maintaining control of the disease; treatment according to the level of severity of asthma, using six steps from least to greatest need of pharmaceutical drugs, and the treatment algorithm for the indication of biologics in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma based on phenotypes. And now, in addition to that, there is a novelty for easy use and follow-up through a computer application based on the chatbot-type conversational artificial intelligence (ia-GEMA).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Isam Alobid
- Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, España
| | | | | | - Jorge Ferreira
- Hospital de São Sebastião – CHEDV, Santa Maria da Feira, Portugal
| | | | - Antonio Gómez-Outes
- Farmacología clínica, Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios (AEMPS), Madrid, España
| | - Noé Garín Escrivá
- Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | | | | | - Javier Korta Murua
- Neumología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Donostia, Donostia-San, Sebastián, España
| | - Jesús Molina París
- Medicina de familia, semFYC, Centro de Salud Francia, Fuenlabrada, Dirección Asistencial Oeste, Madrid, España
| | | | - Javier Plaza Zamora
- Farmacia comunitaria, Farmacia Dr, Javier Plaza Zamora, Mazarrón, Murcia, España
| | | | | | - José Sanz Ortega
- Alergología Pediátrica, Hospital Católico Universitario Casa de Salud, Valencia, España
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Milger K, Suhling H, Skowasch D, Holtdirk A, Kneidinger N, Behr J, Timmermann H, Schulz C, Schmidt O, Ehmann R, Hamelmann E, Idzko M, Taube C, Lommatzsch M, Buhl R, Korn S. Response to Biologics and Clinical Remission in the Adult German Asthma Net Severe Asthma Registry Cohort. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:2701-2712.e2. [PMID: 37301433 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.05.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, criteria for evaluation of response to biologics have been proposed and the concept of clinical remission has gained attention as a possible goal even in severe asthma. OBJECTIVE To analyze the response and remission in the German Asthma Net severe asthma registry cohort. METHODS We included adults not using a biologic at baseline (V0) and compared patients treated between V0 and 1-year visit (V1) without using a biologic (group A) to patients starting with a biologic after V0 and continuing it up to V1 (group B). We applied the Biologics Asthma Response Score to quantify composite response in good, intermediate, or insufficient. We defined clinical remission (R) as absence of significant symptoms (Asthma Control Test score ≥ 20 at V1) in the absence of exacerbations and oral corticosteroid therapy. RESULTS Group A included 233 and group B 210 patients, the latter receiving omalizumab (n = 33), mepolizumab (n = 40), benralizumab (n = 81), reslizumab (n = 1), or dupilumab (n = 56). At baseline, group B had less often an allergic phenotype (35.2% vs 41.6%), lower Asthma Control Test score (median, 12 vs 14), more exacerbations in the past year (median, 3 vs 2), and more often high-dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment (71.4% vs 51.5%) than group A. After 1 year of treatment, rates of response (good: 61.4% vs 34.8%; intermediate: 26.7% vs 42.9%; insufficient: 11.9% vs. 22.3%) and/or clinical remission (37.6% vs 17.2%) were higher in group B than in group A. CONCLUSIONS Despite more severe asthma at baseline, patients treated with biologics had a markedly higher probability of achieving good clinical response and/or remission than patients treated without biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Milger
- Department of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany.
| | - Hendrik Suhling
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dirk Skowasch
- Department of Internal Medicine II - Pneumology/Cardiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Nikolaus Kneidinger
- Department of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen Behr
- Department of Medicine V, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | | | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Olaf Schmidt
- Pneumologische Gemeinschaftspraxis Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | | | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children's Center Bethel, University Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Marco Idzko
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Taube
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University Hospital - Ruhrlandklinik, Essen, Germany
| | - Marek Lommatzsch
- Department of Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Roland Buhl
- Pulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany
| | - Stephanie Korn
- IKF Pneumologie Mainz, Mainz, Germany; Thoraxklinik Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Estravís M, Pérez-Pazos J, Martin MJ, Ramos-González J, Gil-Melcón M, Martín-García C, García-Sánchez A, Sanz C, Dávila I. Correspondence regarding the paper "Laorden D, Zamarrón E, Romero D, Domínguez-Ortega J, Villamañán E, Losantos I, Gayá F, Quirce S, Álvarez-Sala R. Evaluation of FEOS score and super-responder criteria in a real-life cohort treated with anti-IL5/IL5R. Respir. Med. 2023; 211: 107216". Respir Med 2023; 214:107280. [PMID: 37172788 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Estravís
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jacqueline Pérez-Pazos
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Unidad de Farmacogenética y Medicina de Precisión, Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria J Martin
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jacinto Ramos-González
- Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Gil-Melcón
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Univesitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Cristina Martín-García
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Servicio de Inmunoalergia, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Asunción García-Sánchez
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
| | - Catalina Sanz
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Microbiología y Genética, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ignacio Dávila
- Grupo de Investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Servicio de Inmunoalergia, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Climente-Martí M, Alvarado-Arenas M, Ausín-Herrero P, Benito-Bernáldez C, Carballo-Martínez N, Delgado-Romero J. Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project). FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2023; 47:168-174. [PMID: 37268480 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Climente-Martí
- Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, España.
| | | | | | | | | | - Julio Delgado-Romero
- Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Climente-Martí M, Alvarado-Arenas M, Ausín-Herrero P, Benito-Bernáldez C, Carballo-Martínez N, Delgado-Romero J. [Translated article] Advances in the work of multidisciplinary teams for the care of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. A post-COVID vision (TEAM 2.0 project). FARMACIA HOSPITALARIA 2023; 47:T168-T174. [PMID: 37453918 DOI: 10.1016/j.farma.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 01/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease with a high health, social and economic impact, particularly in the case of Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SUA). For this reason, new strategies are especially necessary to improve its approach, with a personalized approach to each patient and from a multidisciplinary perspective, in addition to integrating the new telemedicine and telepharmacy practices promoted as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, the TEAM 2.0 project ("Work in Multidisciplinary Asthma Teams") has been developed, following the TEAM project carried out in 2019, with the aim of updating and prioritizing good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA in a post pandemic context and analyze the progress made. A coordinating group, made up of eight multidisciplinary teams of hospital pharmacists, pulmonologists, and allergists, carried out an updated bibliographic review, sharing of good multidisciplinary practices, and analysis of advances. Through five regional meetings with other experts with experience in SUA, the good practices identified were shared and subjected to debate, evaluation and prioritization. In total, 23 good multidisciplinary work practices in SUA, grouped into five work areas: 1) Organization of work in multidisciplinary teams, 2) Patient education, self-management and adherence, 3) Health results, data monitoring and persistence, 4) Telepharmacy and experiences implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic and 5) Training and research, were evaluated and prioritized by 57 professionals from the field of Hospital Pharmacy, Pulmonology, Allergology and Nursing. This work has made it possible to update the roadmap of priority actions to continue advancing in optimal models of care for patients with AGNC in a post-COVID-19 context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Climente-Martí
- Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khaleva E, Rattu A, Brightling C, Bush A, Bourdin A, Bossios A, Chung KF, Chaudhuri R, Coleman C, Djukanovic R, Dahlén SE, Exley A, Fleming L, Fowler SJ, Gupta A, Hamelmann E, Koppelman GH, Melén E, Mahler V, Seddon P, Singer F, Porsbjerg C, Ramiconi V, Rusconi F, Yasinska V, Roberts G. Definitions of non-response and response to biological therapy for severe asthma: a systematic review. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00444-2022. [PMID: 37143849 PMCID: PMC10152254 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00444-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Biologics have proven efficacy for patients with severe asthma but there is lack of consensus on defining response. We systematically reviewed and appraised methodologically developed, defined and evaluated definitions of non-response and response to biologics for severe asthma. Methods We searched four bibliographic databases from inception to 15 March 2021. Two reviewers screened references, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality of development, measurement properties of outcome measures and definitions of response based on COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN). A modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach and narrative synthesis were undertaken. Results 13 studies reported three composite outcome measures, three asthma symptoms measures, one asthma control measure and one quality of life measure. Only four measures were developed with patient input; none were composite measures. Studies utilised 17 definitions of response: 10 out of 17 (58.8%) were based on minimal clinically important difference (MCID) or minimal important difference (MID) and 16 out of 17 (94.1%) had high-quality evidence. Results were limited by poor methodology for the development process and incomplete reporting of psychometric properties. Most measures rated "very low" to "low" for quality of measurement properties and none met all quality standards. Conclusions This is the first review to synthesise evidence about definitions of response to biologics for severe asthma. While high-quality definitions are available, most are MCIDs or MIDs, which may be insufficient to justify continuation of biologics in terms of cost-effectiveness. There remains an unmet need for universally accepted, patient-centred, composite definitions to aid clinical decision making and comparability of responses to biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ekaterina Khaleva
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Anna Rattu
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Chris Brightling
- Institute for Lung Health, Leicester NIHR BRC, University of Leicester, UK
| | - Andrew Bush
- Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health and National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- PhyMedExp, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Apostolos Bossios
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kian Fan Chung
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rekha Chaudhuri
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Ratko Djukanovic
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sven-Erik Dahlén
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Louise Fleming
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen J. Fowler
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Biological Sciences, Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, University of Manchester, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Atul Gupta
- Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Eckard Hamelmann
- Children's Center Bethel, Department of Pediatrics, University Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Gerard H. Koppelman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Pediatric Allergology, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD (GRIAC), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Melén
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vera Mahler
- Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines, Langen, Germany
| | - Paul Seddon
- Respiratory Care, Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital, Brighton, UK
| | - Florian Singer
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, University Children's Hospital Zurich and Childhood Research Center, Zurich, Switzerland
- Division of Paediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Celeste Porsbjerg
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Respiratory Research Unit, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Valeria Ramiconi
- European Federation of Allergy and Airways Diseases Patients’ Associations, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Franca Rusconi
- Department of Mother and Child Health, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy
| | - Valentyna Yasinska
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergy, Karolinska University Hospital and Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Graham Roberts
- Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Laorden D, Zamarrón E, Romero D, Domínguez-Ortega J, Villamañán E, Losantos I, Gayá F, Quirce S, Álvarez-Sala R. Evaluation of FEOS score and super-responder criteria in a real-life cohort treated with anti-IL5/IL5R. Respir Med 2023; 211:107216. [PMID: 36958514 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2023.107216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Laorden
- Department of Pneumology, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Ester Zamarrón
- Department of Pneumology, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Romero
- Department of Pneumology, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Domínguez-Ortega
- Department of Allergy, Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Francisco Gayá
- Department of Biostatistics, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Santiago Quirce
- Department of Allergy, Hospital La Paz, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala
- Department of Pneumology, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, IdiPAZ, and CIBER of Respiratory Diseases, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Estravís M, Pérez-Pazos J, Martin MJ, Ramos-González J, Gil-Melcón M, Martín-García C, García-Sánchez A, Sanz C, Dávila I. Quantitative and qualitative methods of evaluating response to biologics in severe asthma patients: Results from a real-world study. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:949-951.e2. [PMID: 36423868 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Estravís
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Red Cooperativa de Investigación en Salud-RETICS ARADyAL, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jacqueline Pérez-Pazos
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Unidad de Farmacogenética y Medicina de Precisión, Servicio de Bioquímica Clínica, Servicio de Alergología, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Maria J Martin
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Red Cooperativa de Investigación en Salud-RETICS ARADyAL, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Jacinto Ramos-González
- Servicio de Neumología, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - María Gil-Melcón
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Complejo Asistencial Univesitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Cristina Martín-García
- Servicio de Inmunoalergia, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Asunción García-Sánchez
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Red Cooperativa de Investigación en Salud-RETICS ARADyAL, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
| | - Catalina Sanz
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Red Cooperativa de Investigación en Salud-RETICS ARADyAL, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departamento de Microbiología y Genética, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| | - Ignacio Dávila
- Grupo de investigación en Alergia, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain; Red de Investigación Cooperativa Orientada a Resultados en Salud-RICORS, ISCIII, Salamanca, Spain; Red Cooperativa de Investigación en Salud-RETICS ARADyAL, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Inmunoalergia, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain; Departamento de Ciencias Biomédicas y del Diagnóstico, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anderson WC, Banzon TM, Chawes B, Papadopoulos NG, Phipatanakul W, Szefler SJ. Factors to Consider in Prescribing Asthma Biologic Therapies to Children. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:693-701. [PMID: 36646381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
The increasing availability of biologics, both by expanding age indications and by development of new therapies, provides additional options to treat children and adolescents with severe asthma. However, the evidence for these biologics in these populations is limited compared with that for adult studies. As such, before initiation of therapy, possible alternative therapies that can also provide asthma control, confirmation of the diagnosis of asthma, management of comorbidities, and assessment of adherence should be explored. The choice of a biologic should be a shared decision-making process between providers and families, balancing biologic efficacy, goals of care, administration, and ability to treat multiple conditions. Response to treatment should be periodically evaluated not only to ensure an ineffective treatment is not continued but also to consider when to potentially discontinue therapy should it be beneficial. The utilization of biologics in children and adolescents with severe asthma also leads to unanswered questions on their role in disease remission and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Anderson
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo.
| | - Tina M Banzon
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Bo Chawes
- COPSAC, Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Wanda Phipatanakul
- Division of Asthma, Allergy, Dermatology, Rheumatology, Immunology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass
| | - Stanley J Szefler
- Section of Pediatric Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Breathing Institute, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lee JH, Dixey P, Bhavsar P, Raby K, Kermani N, Chadeau-Hyam M, Adcock IM, Song WJ, Kwon HS, Lee SW, Sook Cho Y, Fan Chung K, Kim TB. Precision Medicine Intervention in Severe Asthma (PRISM) study: molecular phenotyping of patients with severe asthma and response to biologics. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00485-2022. [PMID: 37057090 PMCID: PMC10086686 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00485-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Severe asthma represents an important clinical unmet need despite the introduction of biologic agents. Although advanced omics technologies have aided researchers in identifying clinically relevant molecular pathways, there is a lack of an integrated omics approach in severe asthma particularly in terms of its evolution over time. The collaborative Korea-UK research project Precision Medicine Intervention in Severe Asthma (PRISM) was launched in 2020 with the aim of identifying molecular phenotypes of severe asthma by analysing multi-omics data encompassing genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metagenomics and metabolomics. PRISM is a prospective, observational, multicentre study involving patients with severe asthma attending severe asthma clinics in Korea and the UK. Data including patient demographics, inflammatory phenotype, medication, lung function and control status of asthma will be collected along with biological samples (blood, sputum, urine, nasal epithelial cells and exhaled breath condensate) for omics analyses. Follow-up evaluations will be performed at baseline, 1 month, 4-6 months and 10-12 months to assess the stability of phenotype and treatment responses for those patients who have newly begun biologic therapy. Standalone and integrated omics data will be generated from the patient samples at each visit, paired with clinical information. By analysing these data, we will identify the molecular pathways that drive lung function, asthma control status, acute exacerbations and the requirement for daily oral corticosteroids, and that are involved in the therapeutic response to biological therapy. PRISM will establish a large multi-omics dataset of severe asthma to identify potential key pathophysiological pathways of severe asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Hyang Lee
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Piers Dixey
- National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Katie Raby
- National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Woo-Jung Song
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyouk-Soo Kwon
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei-Won Lee
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - You Sook Cho
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Tae-Bum Kim
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baseline Characteristics of Patients Enrolled in Clinical Trials of Biologics for Severe Asthma as Potential Predictors of Outcomes. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041546. [PMID: 36836079 PMCID: PMC9960148 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Over the past 20 years, monoclonal antibodies have been developed for the treatment of severe asthma, with numerous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted to define their safety and efficacy. The growing availability of biologics, which until now have only been available for T2-high asthma, has been further enriched by the arrival of tezepelumab. (2) Methods: This review aims to evaluate the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in RCTs of biologics for severe asthma to understand how they could potentially predict outcomes and how they can help differentiate between available options. (3) Results: The studies reviewed demonstrated that all biologic agents are effective in improving asthma control, especially with regard to reducing exacerbation rates and OCS use. As we have seen, in this regard, there are few data on omalizumab and none yet on tezepelumab. In analysing exacerbations and average doses of OCSs, pivotal studies on benralizumab have enrolled more seriously ill patients. Secondary outcomes, such as improvement in lung function and quality of life, showed better results-especially for dupilumab and tezepelumab. (4) Conclusion: Biologics are all effective, albeit with important differences. What fundamentally guides the choice is the patient's clinical history, the endotype represented by biomarkers (especially blood eosinophils), and comorbidities (especially nasal polyposis).
Collapse
|
23
|
Martínez Meñaca A, Barbero Herranz E, Muñoz-Esquerre M, Marín-Oto M, García Moyano M, Cascón-Hernández JA, Alonso Pérez T. Highlights del 55.° Congreso SEPAR. OPEN RESPIRATORY ARCHIVES 2023. [PMID: 37497247 PMCID: PMC10369544 DOI: 10.1016/j.opresp.2022.100216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The 55th SEPAR Congress was held in Pamplona from 2 to 4 of June 2022. Once again, it was the referral scientific meeting for specialists in pulmonology, thoracic surgery, nursing, physiotherapy, paediatric respiratory diseases and other disciplines involved in respiratory care. The Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery showed its national and international leadership in the management of respiratory diseases, which was reflected in a program with an excellent content and a high scientific level. In this review, we offer a summary of some notable aspects covered in six selected areas of interest: pulmonary vascular diseases, non-invasive mechanical ventilation and sleep disorders, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung diseases (ILD), and interventional pulmonolgy and lung transplant.
Collapse
|
24
|
Biener L, Milger K, Suhling H, Korn S, Pizarro C, Skowasch D. Impact of short-term pausing of oral corticosteroids on blood eosinophil count in patients with severe asthma. Pneumologie 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1956-8800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background The peripheral blood eosinophil count (BEC) is a well-established and easily accessible biomarker for asthma patients and crucial for the therapeutic decision regarding monoclonal antibody (mAB) therapy. Oral corticosteroid therapy frequently hinders the correct evaluation of BEC in patients with severe asthma, but a discontinuation of such therapy frequently comes along with severe side effects. Therefore, we examined the effect of a short 24-hour pause of OCS treatment on BEC in patients with severe asthma and followed-up whether patients with a then increased eosinophil count benefited from mAB-therapy, as expected.
Methods In this multicentre study we retrospectively included 24 patients with severe asthma and OCS therapy and determined their BEC count. Ten patients, where BEC count was obtained in the morning before taking medication (a de-facto 24-hour OCS pause), were assigned to group 1. Fourteen patients, where BEC was obtained after OCS tapering were assigned to group 2. Those who then received mAB treatment were followed up for treatment response (OCS dose, annual acute exacerbations, increase in forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] and asthma control test [ACT]) after ≥3 months.
Results We included 24 patients with a median age of 60.5 [IQR: 17.3] years. Regarding all baseline characteristics except FEV1 (l), both groups did not differ significantly.Among all 24 patients, after pausing OCS therapy for 2 [5.5] days the BEC increased significantly from 125.0/μl [125] to 300/μl [232.5] (p<0.001). In both individual groups BEC increased significantly as well (150 [123] to 325 [305], p=0.005 and 70 [150] to 280 [255], p<0.001), with no significant difference for increase (BEC +170/µl [205.0] vs. +195 [222.5], p=0.886). Of all 24 patients, 13 (54.2%) reached eosinophil levels ≥300/µl, while 12 of them had not exceeded this threshold before.Subsequently, 20 patients (83.3%) received mAB-therapy with 55.5% demonstrating a good treatment response within 6 [1.5] months. The response rate in patients with BEC count ≥300/µl was even higher (75.0%). There was no difference in the treatment response rate between group 1 and 2 (p=0.092).
Conclusion After just a short 24-hour pause of OCS therapy it was possible to demask a relevant eosinophilia in asthma patients, without risking severe side effects. In this manner, we enabled the possibility of achieving successful targeted mAB-therapy, according to the patient’s individual asthma phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Biener
- Internal Medicine II – Kardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, University Hospital Bonn Center of Internal Medicine, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katrin Milger
- Department of Medicine V, LMU, Munchen, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), LMU and Helmholtz Center Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Suhling
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stephanie Korn
- Pneumologie, IKF, Mainz, Germany
- Thoraxklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carmen Pizarro
- Internal Medicine II – Kardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, University Hospital Bonn Center of Internal Medicine, Bonn, Germany
| | - Dirk Skowasch
- Internal Medicine II – Kardiology, Pneumology, Angiology, University Hospital Bonn Center of Internal Medicine, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
López-Viña A, Díaz Campos RM, Trisan Alonso A, Melero Moreno C. Uncontrolled severe T2 asthma: Which biological to choose? A biomarker-based approach. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:1007593. [PMID: 36452259 PMCID: PMC9701749 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1007593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, advances in knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved in asthma have changed uncontrolled severe asthma (USA) treatment, with the appearance of biological treatment. USA is a heterogeneous entity with different endotypes and phenotypes. Nowadays, the biological drugs approved with asthma indication are omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab. Tezepelumab is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States and, recently, by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). All these biological drugs have shown their efficacy in clinical trials, especially in reducing exacerbations, improving asthma control, quality of life, pulmonary function, and withdrawing systemic corticosteroids or at least reducing their daily dose, with some differences between them. Except for mepolizumab and reslizumab, biological drugs have different targets and thus different therapeutic indications should be expected; however, in some patients, more than one drug could be indicated, making the election more difficult. Because there are no direct comparisons between biological drugs, some biomarkers are used to choose between them, but they are not unbeatable. In this article, an algorithm to choose the first biological drug in a specific patient is proposed based on different study results and patient' characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antolín López-Viña
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocío M. Díaz Campos
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain,Correspondence: Rocío M. Díaz Campos
| | - Andrea Trisan Alonso
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carlos Melero Moreno
- Instituto de Investigación (i+ 12), Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
Severe asthma is a heterogeneous syndrome with several clinical variants and often represents a complex disease requiring a specialized and multidisciplinary approach, as well as the use of multiple drugs. The prevalence of severe asthma varies from one country to another, and it is estimated that 50% of these patients present a poor control of their disease. For the best management of the patient, it is necessary a correct diagnosis, an adequate follow-up and undoubtedly to offer the best available treatment, including biologic treatments with monoclonal antibodies. With this objective, this consensus process was born, which began in its first version in 2018, whose goal is to offer the patient the best possible management of their disease in order to minimize their symptomatology. For this 2020 consensus update, a literature review was conducted by the authors. Subsequently, through a two-round interactive Delphi process, a broad panel of asthma experts from SEPAR and the regional pulmonology societies proposed the recommendations and conclusions contained in this document.
Collapse
|
27
|
Pérez de Llano LA, Cosío BG, Lobato Astiárraga I, Soto Campos G, Tejedor Alonso MÁ, Marina Malanda N, Padilla Galo A, Urrutia Landa I, Michel de la Rosa FJ, García-Moguel I. Asthma Control in Patients with Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated with Reslizumab: Spanish Real-Life Data. J Asthma Allergy 2022; 15:79-88. [PMID: 35058696 PMCID: PMC8765543 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s340562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Reslizumab is an anti-interleukin 5 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated to reduce the risk of severe exacerbations and to improve symptoms, lung function, and quality of life in randomized controlled trials that included patients with severe eosinophilic uncontrolled asthma (SEUA) and a history of severe exacerbations. Objective The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of add-on reslizumab in a cohort of patients with SEUA under real-life conditions. Methods This was a multi-centre, retrospective, real-life study that included subjects with SEUA treated with reslizumab in 44 asthma units throughout Spain. Eligible patients were those who had received at least one dose of reslizumab as part of normal clinical practice. The primary endpoint was complete asthma control at 52 weeks, defined as absence of severe exacerbations, ACT ≥20 and no maintenance oral corticosteroids (OCS). Demographic, clinical, and functional data were collected at baseline (T0), after four to six months (T1); after 12 months (T2) and beyond 12 months of therapy (T3). Results Treatment with reslizumab achieved complete asthma control in 40% of the 208 included SEUA patients and led to a significant reduction in exacerbations (from 3.0; IQR: 2.0–4.0 at V0 to 0.0; IQR: 0.0–0.0 at V2), maintenance OCS use (from 54.8% (95% CI: 48.0–61.6 at T0 to 18.5% (95% CI: 12.5–24.5 at T2) and a meaningful improvement in symptoms in the entire treated population: ACT increased from 12.8 ± 4.5 at V0 to 20.0 ± 5.1 at V2 (p < 0.001). Most of the improvement achieved at 12 months was obtained at 4–6 months. The retention (continuation) rate of reslizumab was 75% through 2 years (95CI%: 1.9–2.1). Overall, reslizumab showed an adequate safety profile. Conclusion Reslizumab is an effective therapy for SEUA with adequate safety profile in real-life conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Borja G Cosío
- Pneumology Service, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa-Ciberes, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
- Correspondence: Borja G Cosío Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hospital Universitario Son ESPASES-IDISBA, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Email
| | | | - Gregorio Soto Campos
- Pneumology and Allergy Unit, University Hospital of Jerez, Jerez de la Frontera, Cádiz, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Effective Management of Severe Asthma with Biologic Medications in Adult Patients: A Literature Review and International Expert Opinion. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 10:422-432. [PMID: 34763123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.10.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Severe asthma often remains uncontrolled despite effective treatments and evidence-based guidelines. A group of global experts in asthma and biologic medications from 9 countries considered the most relevant clinical variables to manage severe asthma in adult patients and guide treatment choice. The resulting recommendations address the investigation of biomarker levels (blood eosinophil count along with fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide [FeNO]), clinical features (oral corticosteroid [OCS] dependence, specific comorbid disease entities associated with severe type 2 asthma), and safety considerations. Current evidence suggests that biomarkers, including both blood or sputum eosinophil counts as well as FeNO, add prognostic and predictive value and should be measured in all patients with severe asthma. OCS use is an important factor in biologic selection, especially given the documented ability of some biologics to reduce OCS dependence. Comorbid diseases and relevant safety considerations to each biologic should also be considered. More data are needed to determine whether biomarker profiles identify patients suited to one biologic versus another as limited data support differential predictors of response. Further prospective head-to-head trials and post hoc analyses of clinical trial data are warranted. The authors believe that these recommendations have value as they offer expert opinion to assist health care providers in making difficult decisions regarding the quality of care in severe, type 2 asthma with biologic medications. They remain conditional and are based on limited data owing to a lack of head-to-head comparisons.
Collapse
|
29
|
Mattei L, Suehs CM, Alagha K, Bourdin A, Brousse C, Charriot J, Devouassoux G, Fry S, Guilleminault L, Gouitaa M, Taille C, Chanez P, Pahus L. Anti-interleukin 5 therapies failure criteria in severe asthma: a Delphi-consensus study. Ther Adv Respir Dis 2021; 15:17534666211049735. [PMID: 34629000 PMCID: PMC8504226 DOI: 10.1177/17534666211049735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Current practices for assessing response to anti-interleukin 5/R treatment in severe asthma patients are heterogeneous. The objective of this study was to achieve an expert consensus defining failure criteria for anti-interleukin 5/R treatment in severe asthma patients. Methods: Experts were invited to a 5-round Delphi exercise if they were pulmonologists managing ⩾30 patients at a nationally recognized severe asthma expert centre. Following two rounds of statement-generating brainstorming, the expert panel ranked each statement according to a 5-point Likert-type scale during three additional rounds. Positive consensus was considered achieved when ⩾80% of experts agreed with a statement with >50% strong agreement and <15% disagreement. Results: Twenty experts participated in the study. All experts agreed that predefined treatment goals defining effectiveness should be personalized during shared decision making via a patient contract. Treatment failure was defined as (1) absence of a reduction in exacerbation rates by ⩾25% or (2) absence of a reduction in oral corticosteroid therapy by ⩾25% of the initial dosage or (3) occurrence of emergency room visits or hospitalizations after 6 months of treatment. Treatment failure should result in discontinuation. For partial responders, treatment discontinuation was not recommended unless an alternative from another therapeutic class exists and should be discussed in a multidisciplinary consultation. Conclusion: The present study provides objective criteria for anti IL5 or IL5R failure in severe asthma and suggests consensus based guidelines for prescription, evaluation and discontinuation decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Mattei
- Aix Marseille Univ., APHM, Clinique des bronches, de l'allergie et du sommeil, Hôpital Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, 13015 Marseille, France
| | - Carey M Suehs
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Department of Medical Information, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Khuder Alagha
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Clinique du Parc, Castelnau-le-Lez, France
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,PhyMedExp, CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France
| | - Christophe Brousse
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Clinique du Parc, Castelnau-le-Lez, France
| | - Jeremy Charriot
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,PhyMedExp, CNRS, INSERM, Univ. Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Gilles Devouassoux
- Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Service de Pneumologie, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Inflammation and Immunity of the Respiratory Epithelium-EA7426 (PI3)-South Medical University Hospital-Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Stephanie Fry
- Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,CHU Lille, Service de Pneumologie et Immuno-allergologie, Institut Pasteur Lille, Univ. Lille, Lille, France
| | - Laurent Guilleminault
- Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, Toulouse University Hospital Centre, Toulouse, France.,Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), Inserm U1291, University of Toulouse, CNRS U5282, Toulouse, France
| | - Marion Gouitaa
- Aix Marseille Univ., APHM, Clinique des bronches allergies et sommeil, Marseille, France
| | - Camille Taille
- Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire AP-HP Nord-Université de Paris, Hôpital Bichat, Service de Pneumologie et Centre de Référence constitutif des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares, Inserm UMR 1152, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Chanez
- Aix Marseille Univ., APHM, Clinique des bronches allergies et sommeil, Marseille, France.,Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,Aix Marseille Univ., INSERM U1263, INRA 1260 (C2VN), Marseille, France
| | - Laurie Pahus
- Aix Marseille Univ., APHM, Clinique des bronches allergies et sommeil, Marseille, France.,Clinical Research Initiative In Severe Asthma: a Lever for Innovation & Science (CRISALIS), F-CRIN Network, INSERM US 015, Toulouse, France.,Aix Marseille Univ., INSERM U1263, INRA 1260 (C2VN), Marseille, France.,Aix Marseille Univ., CNRS, EFS, ADES, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|