Clinical and genetic analyses of familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia patients in Southern Italy

Diagnostic accuracy of research criteria for prodromal frontotemporal dementia

BACKGROUND

The Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative Staging Group has proposed clinical criteria for the diagnosis of prodromal frontotemporal dementia (FTD), termed mild cognitive and/or behavioral and/or motor impairment (MCBMI). The objective of the study was to validate the proposed research criteria for MCBMI-FTD in a cohort of genetically confirmed FTD cases against healthy controls.

METHODS

A total of 398 participants were enrolled, 117 of whom were carriers of an FTD pathogenic variant with mild clinical symptoms, while 281 were non-carrier family members (healthy controls (HC)). A subgroup of patients underwent blood neurofilament light (NfL) levels and anterior cingulate atrophy assessment.

RESULTS

The core clinical criteria correctly classified MCBMI vs HC with an AUC of 0.79 (p < 0.001), while the addition of either blood NfL or anterior cingulate atrophy significantly increased the AUC to 0.84 and 0.82, respectively (p < 0.001). The addition of both markers further increased the AUC to 0.90 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed MCBMI criteria showed very good classification accuracy for identifying the prodromal stage of FTD.

Antemortem network analysis of spreading pathology in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal degeneration

Despite well-articulated hypotheses of spreading pathology in animal models of neurodegenerative disease, the basis for spreading neurodegenerative pathology in humans has been difficult to ascertain. In this study, we used graph theoretic analyses of structural networks in antemortem, multimodal MRI from autopsy-confirmed cases to examine spreading pathology in sporadic frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We defined phases of progressive cortical atrophy on T1-weighted MRI using a published algorithm in autopsied frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions or with transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions. We studied global and local indices of structural networks in each of these phases, focusing on the integrity of grey matter hubs and white matter edges projecting between hubs. We found that global network measures are compromised to an equal degree in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions and frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions compared to healthy controls. While measures of local network integrity were compromised in both frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions and frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions, we discovered several important characteristics that distinguished between these groups. Hubs identified in controls were degraded in both patient groups, but degraded hubs were associated with the earliest phase of cortical atrophy (i.e. epicentres) only in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions. Degraded edges were significantly more plentiful in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions than in frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions, suggesting that the spread of tau pathology involves more significant white matter degeneration. Weakened edges were associated with degraded hubs in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions more than in frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions, particularly in the earlier phases of the disease, and phase-to-phase transitions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions were characterized by weakened edges in earlier phases projecting to diseased hubs in subsequent phases of the disease. When we examined the spread of pathology from a region diseased in an earlier phase to physically adjacent regions in subsequent phases, we found greater evidence of disease spreading to adjacent regions in frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions than in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau inclusions. We associated evidence of degraded grey matter hubs and weakened white matter edges with quantitative measures of digitized pathology from direct observations of patients' brain samples. We conclude from these observations that the spread of pathology from diseased regions to distant regions via weakened long-range edges may contribute to spreading disease in frontotemporal dementia-tau, while spread of pathology to physically adjacent regions via local neuronal connectivity may play a more prominent role in spreading disease in frontotemporal lobar degeneration-transactional DNA binding protein of ∼43 kDa inclusions.

Identification and functional characterization of novel variants of MAPT and GRN in Chinese patients with frontotemporal dementia

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of dementia after Alzheimer's disease, characterized by distinct changes in behavior, personality, and language. Our study performed whole exome sequencing and repeat-primed PCR analysis in 29 unrelated FTD patients. Consequently, 2 known pathogenic variants (MAPT: p.P301L; TBK1: p.I450Kfs), and 4 novel variants (MAPT: p.R406Q, p.D430H, p.A330D; GRN: c.350-2A>G) were identified. The functional analysis results showed that phosphorylated tau levels were higher in cells expressing p.R406Q and p.D430H tau than those expressing wild-type tau, especially at the Thr205, Thr231, and Ser396 phosphorylation epitopes. Besides, the p.R406Q and p.D430H variants of MAPT impaired the ability of tau to bind to the microtubules and increased tau self-aggregation. Furthermore, we found that the c.350-2A>G variant caused exon 5 skipping. Our results showed that p.R406Q, p.D430H, and c.350-2A>G variants were classified as pathogenic. Finally, we summarized the clinical characterization of patients carrying pathogenic variants of MAPT in the East Asia populations. Our results broaden the genetic spectrum of FTD with MAPT and GRN variants.

Event-based modeling of T1-weighted MRI is related to pathology in frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to tau and TDP

BACKGROUND

In previous studies of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to tau (FTLD-tau) and FTLD due to TDP (FTLD-TDP), cortical volumes derived from T1-weighted MRI have been used to identify a sequence of volume loss according to arbitrary volumetric criteria. Event-based modeling (EBM) is a probabilistic, generative machine learning model that determines the characteristic sequence of changes, or "events", occurring during disease progression. EBM also estimates an individual patient's disease "stage" by identifying which events have already occurred. In the present study, we use an EBM analysis to derive stages of regional anatomic atrophy in FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP, and validated these stages against pathologic burden.

METHODS

Sporadic autopsy-confirmed patients with FTLD-tau (N = 42) and FTLD-TDP (N = 21), and 167 healthy controls with available T1-weighted images were identified. A subset of patients had quantitative digital histopathology of cortex performed at autopsy (FTLD-tau = 30, FTLD-TDP = 17). MRI images were processed, producing regional measures of cortical volumes. K-means clustering was used to find cortical regions with similar amounts of GM volume changes (n = 5 clusters). EBM was used to determine the characteristic sequence of cortical atrophy of identified clusters in autopsy-confirmed FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP, and estimate each patient's disease stage by cortical volume biomarkers. Linear regressions related pathologic burden to EBM-estimated disease stages.

RESULTS

EBM for cortical volume biomarkers generated statistically robust characteristic sequences of cortical atrophy in each group of patients. Cortical volume-based EBM-estimated disease stage was associated with pathologic burden in FTLD-tau (R2 = 0.16, p = 0.017) and FTLD-TDP (R2 = 0.51, p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide evidence that EBM can identify sequences of pathologically-confirmed cortical atrophy in sporadic FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP.

Neurocognitive patterns across genetic levels in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia: a multiple single cases study

BACKGROUND

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) has been related to different genetic factors. Identifying multimodal phenotypic heterogeneity triggered by various genetic influences is critical for improving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatments. However, the specific impact of different genetic levels (mutations vs. risk variants vs. sporadic presentations) on clinical and neurocognitive phenotypes is not entirely understood, specially in patites from underrepresented regions such as Colombia.

METHODS

Here, in a multiple single cases study, we provide systematic comparisons regarding cognitive, neuropsychiatric, brain atrophy, and gene expression-atrophy overlap in a novel cohort of FTD patients (n = 42) from Colombia with different genetic levels, including patients with known genetic influences (G-FTD) such as those with genetic mutations (GR1) in particular genes (MAPT, TARDBP, and TREM2); patients with risk variants (GR2) in genes associated with FTD (tau Haplotypes H1 and H2 and APOE variants including ε2, ε3, ε4); and sporadic FTD patients (S-FTD (GR3)).

RESULTS

We found that patients from GR1 and GR2 exhibited earlier disease onset, pervasive cognitive impairments (cognitive screening, executive functioning, ToM), and increased brain atrophy (prefrontal areas, cingulated cortices, basal ganglia, and inferior temporal gyrus) than S-FTD patients (GR3). No differences in disease duration were observed across groups. Additionally, significant neuropsychiatric symptoms were observed in the GR1. The GR1 also presented more clinical and neurocognitive compromise than GR2 patients; these groups, however, did not display differences in disease onset or duration. APOE and tau patients showed more neuropsychiatric symptoms and primary atrophy in parietal and temporal cortices than GR1 patients. The gene-atrophy overlap analysis revealed atrophy in regions with specific genetic overexpression in all G-FTD patients. A differential family presentation did not explain the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the existence of genetic levels affecting the clinical, neurocognitive, and, to a lesser extent, neuropsychiatric presentation of bvFTD in the present underrepresented sample. These results support tailored assessments characterization based on the parallels of genetic levels and neurocognitive profiles in bvFTD.

Differences and similarities between familial and sporadic frontotemporal dementia: An Italian single-center cohort study

Introduction

The possibility to generalize our understandings on treatments and assessments to both familial frontotemporal dementia (f-FTD) and sporadic FTD (s-FTD) is a fundamental perspective for the near future, considering the constant advancement in potential disease-modifying therapies that target particular genetic forms of FTD. We aimed to investigate differences in clinical features, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and blood-based biomarkers between f-FTD and s-FTD.

Methods

In this longitudinal cohort study, we evaluated a consecutive sample of symptomatic FTD patients, classified as f-FTD and s-FTD according to Goldman scores (GS). All patients underwent clinical, behavioral, and neuropsychiatric symptom assessment, CSF biomarkers and serum neurofilament light (NfL) analysis, and brain atrophy evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

Of 570 patients with FTD, 123 were classified as f-FTD, and 447 as s-FTD. In the f-FTD group, 95 had a pathogenic FTD mutation while 28 were classified as GS = 1 or 2; of the s-FTD group, 133 were classified as GS = 3 and 314 with GS = 4. f-FTD and s-FTD cases showed comparable demographic features, except for younger age at disease onset, age at diagnosis, and higher years of education in the f-FTD group (all P < .05). f-FTD showed worse behavioral disturbances as measured with Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) negative behaviors (14.0 ± 7.6 vs. 11.6 ± 7.4, P = .002), and positive behaviors (20.0 ± 11.0 vs. 17.4 ± 11.8, P = .031). Serum NfL concentrations were higher in patients with f-FTD (70.9 ± 37.9 pg/mL) compared to s-FTD patients (37.3 ± 24.2 pg/mL, P < .001), and f-FTD showed greater brain atrophy in the frontal and temporal regions and basal ganglia. Patients with f-FTD had significantly shorter survival than those with s-FTD (P = .004).

Discussion

f-FTD and s-FTD are very similar clinical entities, but with different biological mechanisms, and different rates of progression. The parallel characterization of both f-FTD and s-FTD will improve our understanding of the disease, and aid in designing future clinical trials for both genetic and sporadic forms of FTD.

Highlights

Do clinical features and biomarkers differ between patients with familial frontotemporal dementia (f-FTD) and sporadic FTD (s-FTD)?In this cohort study of 570 patients with FTD, f-FTD and s-FTD share similar demographic features, but with younger age at disease onset and diagnosis in the f-FTD group.f-FTD showed higher serum neurofilament light concentrations, greater brain damage, and shorter survival, compared to s-FTD.f-FTD and s-FTD are very similar clinical entities, but with different cognitive reserve mechanisms and different rates of progression.

Phases of volume loss in patients with known frontotemporal lobar degeneration spectrum pathology

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) includes clinically similar FTLD-tau or FTLD-TDP proteinopathies which lack in vivo markers for accurate antemortem diagnosis. To identify early distinguishing sites of cortical atrophy between groups, we retrospectively analyzed in vivo volumetric MRI from 42 FTLD-Tau and 21 FTLD-TDP patients and validated these findings with postmortem measures of pathological burden. Our frequency-based staging model revealed distinct loci of maximal early cortical atrophy in each group, including dorsolateral and medial frontal regions in FTLD-Tau and ventral frontal and anterior temporal regions in FTLD-TDP. Sørenson-Dice calculations between proteinopathy groups showed little overlap of phases. Conversely, within-group subtypes showed good overlap between 3R- and 4R-tauopathies, and between TDP-43 Types A and C for early regions with subtle divergence between subtypes in subsequent phases of atrophy. Postmortem validation found an association of imaging phases with pathologic burden within FTLD-tau (F(4, 238) = 17.44, p < 0.001) and FTLD-TDP (F(4,245) = 42.32, p < 0.001). These results suggest that relatively early, distinct markers of atrophy may distinguish FTLD proteinopathies during life.

Conceptual framework for the definition of preclinical and prodromal frontotemporal dementia

The presymptomatic stages of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are still poorly defined and encompass a long accrual of progressive biological (preclinical) and then clinical (prodromal) changes, antedating the onset of dementia. The heterogeneity of clinical presentations and the different neuropathological phenotypes have prevented a prior clear description of either preclinical or prodromal FTD. Recent advances in therapeutic approaches, at least in monogenic disease, demand a proper definition of these predementia stages. It has become clear that a consensus lexicon is needed to comprehensively describe the stages that anticipate dementia. The goal of the present work is to review existing literature on the preclinical and prodromal phases of FTD, providing recommendations to address the unmet questions, therefore laying out a strategy for operationalizing and better characterizing these presymptomatic disease stages.

Transcriptomic and Network Meta-Analysis of Frontotemporal Dementias

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), also known as frontotemporal dementia (FTD), results in a progressive decline in executive function, leading to behavioral changes, speech problems, and movement disorders. FTD is the second most common cause of young-onset dementia affecting approximately 50–60,000 Americans. FTD exists in familial and sporadic forms, with GRN progranulin and C9orf72 mutations being the most common causes. In this study, we compared the sporadic and familial transcriptome within the cerebellum, frontal cortex, hippocampus, and Brodmann’s area 8 of patients with FTD to determine genes and pathways involved in the disease process. Most dysregulated genes expression occurred in the frontal cortex and Brodmann’s area 8 for genetic and sporadic forms of FTD, respectively. A meta-analysis revealed 50 genes and 95 genes are dysregulated in at least three brain regions in patients with familial mutations and sporadic FTD patients, respectively. Familial FTD genes centered on the Wnt signaling pathway, whereas genes associated with the sporadic form of FTD centered on MAPK signaling. The results reveal the similarities and differences between sporadic and familial FTD. In addition, valproic acid and additional therapeutic agents may be beneficial in treating patients with FTD.

Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy for Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Overview

Neurodegenerative diseases resulting from the progressive loss of structure and/or function of neurons contribute to different paralysis degrees and loss of cognition and sensation. The lack of successful curative therapies for neurodegenerative disorders leads to a considerable burden on society and a high economic impact. Over the past 20 years, regenerative cell therapy, also known as stem cell therapy, has provided an excellent opportunity to investigate potentially powerful innovative strategies for treating neurodegenerative diseases. This is due to stem cells' capability to repair injured neuronal tissue by replacing the damaged or lost cells with differentiated cells, providing a conducive environment that is in favor of regeneration, or protecting the existing healthy neurons and glial cells from further damage. Thus, in this review, the various types of stem cells, the current knowledge of stem-cell-based therapies in neurodegenerative diseases, and the recent advances in this field are summarized. Indeed, a better understanding and further studies of stem cell technologies cause progress into realistic and efficacious treatments of neurodegenerative disorders.

Comparison of Prodromal Symptoms of Patients with Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer Disease

INTRODUCTION

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is the most common clinical subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. bvFTD is often characterized by changes in behavior and personality, frequently leading to psychiatric misdiagnoses. On the other hand, substantial clinical overlap with other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer disease (AD), further complicates the diagnostics.

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to identify the main differences in early symptoms of bvFTD and AD in the prodromal stages of the diseases. In addition, patients with bvFTD were analyzed separately according to whether they carry the C9orf72repeat expansion or not.

METHODS

Patient records of bvFTD (n = 75) and AD (n = 83) patients were analyzed retrospectively for memory and neuropsychiatric symptoms, sleeping disorders, and somatic complaints before the setting of the accurate diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 84% of bvFTD patients (n = 63) and 98.8% of AD patients (n = 82) reported subjective memory disturbances in the prodromal phases of the disease. bvFTD patients presented significantly more often with sleeping disorders, headache, inexplicable collapses, transient loss of consciousness, somatization, delusions, and hallucinations, suicidality, changes in oral behaviors, and urinary problems. In addition, poor financial judgement was frequently detected in patients with prodromal bvFTD. Aberrant sensations in the nose and throat without any physical explanation, regarded as somatizations, emerged only in bvFTD patients with the C9orf72 repeat expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjective reporting of impaired episodic memory is a poor indicator in differentiating bvFTD from AD. Sleeping disturbances, delusions, hallucinations, and unexplained somatic complaints in a patient with cognitive disturbances should prompt the clinicians to consider bvFTD as a possible diagnostic option behind these symptoms. The spectrum of symptoms in the prodromal stages of bvFTD may be more diverse than the latest criteria suggest.

The Rise of the GRN C157KfsX97 Mutation in Southern Italy: Going Back to the Fall of the Western Roman Empire

BACKGROUND

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) designates a group of neurodegenerative diseases with remarkable clinical, pathological, and genetic heterogeneity. Mutations in progranulin gene (GRN) are among the most common causes of familial FTLD. The GRN C157KfsX97 mutation is the most frequent mutation occurring in Southern Italy and has been already described in a previous work.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we reported on additional cases carrying the same mutation and performed a genetic study on the whole cohort, aiming at demonstrating the existence of a founder effect and estimating the age of this mutation.

METHODS/RESULTS

Based on the haplotype sharing analysis, a founder effect was highly probable, while the age of the mutation, estimated by means of DMLE+ software, resulted in a range between 52 and 82 generations, with the highest frequency at about 62 generations, 1,550 years ago.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study that reports the age estimation of the most recent common ancestor for the GRN C157KfsX97 mutation recurring in Southern Italy. Mutation dating in a geographically restricted population may be useful in order to plan genetic counseling and screening programs in the field of public health.

Development of disease-modifying drugs for frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorders

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) encompasses a spectrum of clinical syndromes characterized by progressive executive, behavioural and language dysfunction. The various FTD spectrum disorders are associated with brain accumulation of different proteins: tau, the transactive response DNA binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP43), or fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein, Ewing sarcoma protein and TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15 (TAF15) (collectively known as FET proteins). Approximately 60% of patients with FTD have autosomal dominant mutations in C9orf72, GRN or MAPT genes. Currently available treatments are symptomatic and provide limited benefit. However, the increased understanding of FTD pathogenesis is driving the development of potential disease-modifying therapies. Most of these drugs target pathological tau - this category includes tau phosphorylation inhibitors, tau aggregation inhibitors, active and passive anti-tau immunotherapies, and MAPT-targeted antisense oligonucleotides. Some of these therapeutic approaches are being tested in phase II clinical trials. Pharmacological approaches that target the effects of GRN and C9orf72 mutations are also in development. Key results of large clinical trials will be available in a few years. However, clinical trials in FTD pose several challenges, and the development of specific brain imaging and molecular biomarkers could facilitate the recruitment of clinically homogenous groups to improve the chances of positive clinical trial results.

Comparison of sporadic and familial behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in a North American cohort

INTRODUCTION

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) may present sporadically or due to an autosomal dominant mutation. Characterization of both forms will improve understanding of the generalizability of assessments and treatments.

METHODS

A total of 135 sporadic (s-bvFTD; mean age 63.3 years; 34% female) and 99 familial (f-bvFTD; mean age 59.9; 48% female) bvFTD participants were identified. f-bvFTD cases included 43 with known or presumed chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) gene expansions, 28 with known or presumed microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) mutations, 14 with known progranulin (GRN) mutations, and 14 with a strong family history of FTD but no identified mutation.

RESULTS

Participants with f-bvFTD were younger and had earlier age at onset. s-bvFTD had higher total Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) scores due to more frequent endorsement of depression and irritability.

DISCUSSION

f-bvFTD and s-bvFTD cases are clinically similar, suggesting the generalizability of novel biomarkers, therapies, and clinical tools developed in either form to the other.

The Missing Heritability of Sporadic Frontotemporal Dementia: New Insights from Rare Variants in Neurodegenerative Candidate Genes

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a common form of dementia among early-onset cases. Several genetic factors for FTD have been revealed, but a large proportion of FTD cases still have an unidentified genetic origin. Recent studies highlighted common pathobiological mechanisms among neurodegenerative diseases. In the present study, we investigated a panel of candidate genes, previously described to be associated with FTD and/or other neurodegenerative diseases by targeted next generation sequencing (NGS). We focused our study on sporadic FTD (sFTD), devoid of disease-causing mutations in GRN, MAPT and C9orf72. Since genetic factors have a substantially higher pathogenetic contribution in early onset patients than in late onset dementia, we selected patients with early onset (<65 years). Our study revealed that, in 50% of patients, rare missense potentially pathogenetic variants in genes previously associated with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Lewy body dementia (GBA, ABCA7, PARK7, FUS, SORL1, LRRK2, ALS2), confirming genetic pleiotropy in neurodegeneration. In parallel, a synergic genetic effect on FTD is suggested by the presence of variants in five different genes in one single patient. Further studies employing genome-wide approaches might highlight pathogenic variants in novel genes that explain the still missing heritability of FTD.

Promising therapies for the treatment of frontotemporal dementia clinical phenotypes: from symptomatic to disease-modifying drugs

INTRODUCTION

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a heterogeneous clinical entity that includes several disorders characterized by different cellular mechanisms. Distinctive clinical features in FTD include behavioral, affective, and cognitive symptoms. Unfortunately, little progress has been made over the past 20 years in terms of the development of effective disease-modifying drugs with the currently available symptomatic treatments having limited clinical utility.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the principal pharmacological intervention studies for FTD. These are predominantly randomized clinical trials and include symptomatic treatments and potential disease-modifying drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

There is insufficient evidence on effective treatments for FTD and studies with better methodological backgrounds are needed. Most studies reporting therapeutic benefits were conducted with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, while anti-dementia drugs have been ineffective in FTD. Since the underlying pathology of FTD mostly consists of abnormal tau protein or TDP-43 aggregates, treatments are being developed to interfere with their aggregation process or with the clearance of these proteins. Furthermore, disease-modifying treatments remain years away as demonstrated by the recent negative Phase III findings of a tau aggregation inhibitor (LMTM) for treating the behavioral variant of FTD. The results from current ongoing Phase I/II trials will hopefully give light to future treatment options.

Incidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration in Italy: The Salento-Brescia Registry study

OBJECTIVE

The goal of the present work, based on a collaborative research registry in Italy (the Salento-Brescia Registry), was to assess the incidence of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and to define the frequencies of different FTLD phenotypes in the general population.

METHODS

The study was conducted from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, in 2 Italian provinces: Lecce (in Puglia) in the south (area 2,799.07 km², inhabitants 802,082) and Brescia (in Lombardy) in the north (area 4,785.62 km², inhabitants 1,262,678). During the study period, all new cases of FTLD (incident FTLD) were counted, and all patients' records were reviewed. The incidence was standardized to the Italian general population in 2017.

RESULTS

In the 2 provinces, 63 patients with FTLD were diagnosed. The incidence rate for FTLD was 3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.34-3.90) per 100,000 person-years (py), while the age-sex standardized incidence rate was 3.09 (95% CI 2.95-3.23) per 100,000 py. In the Italian population, the lifetime risk was 1:400. There was a progressive increase in FTLD incidence across age groups, reaching its peak in the 75- to 79-year-old group, with an incidence rate of 15.97 (95% CI 8.94-26.33) per 100,000 py. The behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia was the most common phenotype (37%). No difference in crude incidence rate between the 2 provinces was observed.

CONCLUSION

FTLD is a more common form of dementia than previously recognized, with a risk spanning in a wide age range and with maximum incidence in the mid-70s. Improved knowledge of FTLD epidemiology will help to provide appropriate public health service policies.

Heritability in frontotemporal tauopathies

Introduction

Exploring the degree of heritability in a large cohort of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with tau-immunopositive inclusions (FTLD-tau) and determining if different FTLD-tau subtypes are associated with stronger heritability will provide important insight into disease pathogenesis.

Methods

Using modified Goldman pedigree classifications, heritability was examined in pathologically proven FTLD-tau cases with dementia at any time (n = 124) from the Sydney-Cambridge collection.

Results

Thirteen percent of the FTLD-tau cohort have a suggested autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance, 25% have some family history, and 62% apparently sporadic. MAPT mutations were found in 9% of cases. Globular glial tauopathy was associated with the strongest heritability with 40% having a suggested autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance followed by corticobasal degeneration (19%), Pick's disease (8%), and progressive supranuclear palsy (6%).

Discussion

Similar to clinical frontotemporal dementia syndromes, heritability varies between pathological subtypes. Further identification of a genetic link in cases with strong heritability await discovery.

Frontotemporal dementia: latest evidence and clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) describes a cluster of neurocognitive syndromes that present with impairment of executive functioning, changes in behavior, and a decrease in language proficiency. FTD is the second most common form of dementia in those younger than 65 years and is expected to increase in prevalence as the population ages. This goal in our review is to describe advances in the understanding of neurobiological pathology, classification, assessment, and treatment of FTD syndromes.

METHODS

PubMed was searched to obtain reviews and studies that pertain to advancements in genetics, neurobiology, neuroimaging, classification, and treatment of FTD syndromes. Articles were chosen with a predilection to more recent preclinical/clinical trials and systematic reviews.

RESULTS

Recent reviews and trials indicate a significant advancement in the understanding of molecular and neurobiological clinical correlates to variants of FTD. Genetic and histopathologic markers have only recently been discovered in the past decade. Current therapeutic modalities are limited, with most studies reporting improvement in symptoms with nonpharmacological interventions. However, a small number of studies have reported improvement of behavioral symptoms with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) treatment. Stimulants may help with disinhibition, apathy, and risk-taking behavior. Memantine and cholinesterase inhibitors have not demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating FTD symptoms. Antipsychotics have been used to treat agitation and psychosis, but safety concerns and side effect profiles limit utilization in the general FTD population. Nevertheless, recent breakthroughs in the understanding of FTD pathology have led to developments in pharmacological interventions that focus on producing treatments with autoimmune, genetic, and molecular targets.

CONCLUSION

FTD is an underdiagnosed group of neurological syndromes comprising multiple variants with distinct neurobiological profiles and presentations. Recent advances suggest there is an array of potential novel therapeutic targets, although data concerning their effectiveness are still preliminary or preclinical. Further studies are required to develop pharmacological interventions, as there are currently no US Food and Drug administration approved treatments to manage FTD syndromes.