Early supplemental parenteral nutrition is associated with increased infectious complications in critically ill trauma patients

Effect of early achievement of energy target by different nutritional support strategies on nosocomial infections in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a secondary analysis of two randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

The effect of early achievement of energy targets (EAETs) using different nutritional support strategies in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery is unclear. This study determined the impact of EAETs on the incidence of nosocomial infections in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of two open-label randomized clinical trials. Patients from the general surgery department of 11 academic hospitals in China undergoing major abdominal surgery and at nutritional risk (Nutritional risk screening 2002≥3) were divided into two groups based on whether they met the 70% energy targets, the EAET (521 EAET and non-achievement of energy target (114 NAET) groups. The primary outcome was the incidence of nosocomial infections between postoperative day 3 and discharge, and the secondary outcomes were actual energy and protein intake, postoperative noninfectious complications, intensive care unit admission, mechanical ventilation, and hospital stay.

RESULTS

Overall, 635 patients [mean (SD) age, 59.5 (11.3) years] were included. The EAET group received more mean energy between days 3 and 7 than the NAET group (22.7±5.0 vs. 15.1±4.8 kcal/kg/d; P <0.001). The EAET group had significantly fewer nosocomial infections than the NAET group [46/521(8.8%) vs. 21/114(18.4%); risk difference, 9.6%; 95% CI, 2.1-17.1%; P =0.004]. A significant difference was found in the mean (SD) number of noninfectious complications between the EAET and NAET groups [121/521(23.2%) vs. 38/114(33.3%); risk difference, 10.1%; 95% CI, 0.7-19.5%; P =0.024]. The nutritional status of the EAET group was significantly improved at discharge compared with the NAET group ( P <0.001), and other indicators were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSION

EAETs was associated with fewer nosocomial infections and improved clinical outcomes, regardless of the nutritional support strategy (early enteral nutrition alone or combined with early supplemental parenteral nutrition).

Associations between early parenteral nutrition and in-hospital outcomes in underweight patients with gastrointestinal surgery

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Guidelines recommend early parenteral nutrition for malnourished patients. However, the effectiveness of early parenteral nutrition in underweight patients has not been established. This study aimed to determine whether in-hospital outcomes were associated with early parenteral nutrition in underweight gastrointestinal surgery patients with short-term contraindications to early enteral nutrition.

METHODS

We identified underweight adult gastrointestinal surgery patients with short-term contraindications to early enteral nutrition using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from July 2010 to March 2018. We performed propensity-score overlap weighting to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without early parenteral nutrition. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay. The secondary outcomes were total hospitalization cost, hospital-acquired pneumonia, hospital-acquired urinary tract infection, central line-associated bloodstream infection, and all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

We identified 31,898 eligible patients. Early parenteral nutrition was associated with longer hospital stay (19.2 vs. 18.4 days; difference, 0.7 days; 95% CI, 0.1 to 1.4). There were no differences between the patients with and without early parenteral nutrition in total hospitalization cost (difference, US$60; 95% CI, -277 to 397), hospital-acquired pneumonia (risk difference, -0.11%; 95% CI, -0.78 to 0.55), hospital-acquired urinary tract infection (risk difference, 0.03%; 95% CI, -0.08 to 0.14), central line-associated bloodstream infection (risk difference, 0.08%; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.18), and all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality (risk difference, 0.31%; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Early parenteral nutrition for underweight gastrointestinal surgery patients with short-term contraindications to early enteral nutrition was associated with longer hospital stay.

Association between parenteral nutrition in the early phase and outcomes in patients with abdominal trauma undergoing emergency laparotomy: A retrospective nationwide study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Parenteral nutrition in the early phase is often performed for patients with trauma who have undergone laparotomy. However, the clinical benefits of parenteral nutrition in the early phase in this population remain unknown. We investigated the association of parenteral nutrition in the early phase with outcomes in patients with trauma who underwent emergency laparotomy.

METHODS

Using a Japanese nationwide database from July 2010 to March 2018, we identified patients with trauma who underwent emergency laparotomy on admission to the hospital, required mechanical ventilation on admission, and did not receive enteral nutrition within 2 days after admission. We performed an overlap weights analysis to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients with and without parenteral nutrition in the early phase. The primary outcome was the duration of mechanical ventilation. The secondary outcomes were the length of hospital stay, total hospitalization cost, tracheostomy, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 1700 adult patients were included. There were no significant associations between parenteral nutrition in the early phase and the duration of mechanical ventilation (difference, -0.4 days; 95% confidence interval, -2.9 to 2.2), length of hospital stay (difference, 1.3 days; 95% confidence interval, -5.0 to 7.5), total hospitalization cost (difference, US$ 730; 95% confidence interval, -2911 to 4370), tracheostomy (risk difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.03 to 0.05), hospital-acquired pneumonia (risk difference, -0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.05 to 0.03), or all-cause 28-day in-hospital mortality (risk difference, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, -0.01 to 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Parenteral nutrition in the early phase for patients with trauma undergoing emergency laparotomy was not associated with better in-hospital outcomes.

Effect of Supplemental Parenteral Nutrition Versus Enteral Nutrition Alone on Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Enteral nutrition (EN) is considered the first feeding route for critically ill patients. However, adverse effects such as gastrointestinal complications limit its optimal provision, leading to inadequate energy and protein intake. We compared the clinical outcomes of supplemental parenteral nutrition added to EN (SPN + EN) and EN alone in critically ill adults. Electronic databases restricted to full-text randomized controlled trials available in the English language and published from January 1990 to January 2019 were searched. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and the meta-analysis was conducted using the MedCalc software. A total of five studies were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared to EN alone, SPN + EN decreased the risk of nosocomial infections (relative risk (RR) = 0.733, p = 0.032) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR = 0.569, p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed between SPN + EN and EN in the length of hospital stay, hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. In conclusion, when enteral feeding fails to fulfill the energy requirements in critically ill adult patients, SPN may be beneficial as it helps in decreasing nosocomial infections and ICU mortality, in addition to increasing energy and protein intakes with no negative effects on other clinical outcomes.

Parenteral nutrition prolongs hospital stay in children with nonoperative blunt pancreatic injury: A propensity score weighted analysis

BACKGROUND

Blunt pancreatic injury is frequently managed nonoperatively in children. Nutritional support practices - either enteral or parenteral - are heterogeneous and lack evidence-based guidelines. We hypothesized that use of parenteral nutrition (PN) in children with nonoperatively managed blunt pancreatic injury would 1) be associated with longer hospital stay and more frequent complications, and 2) differ in frequency by trauma center type.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2016). Children (≤18 years) with blunt pancreatic injury were included. Patients were excluded for duodenal injury, mortality <4 days from admission, or laparotomy. We compared children that received versus those that did not receive PN. Logistic regression was used to model patient characteristics, injury severity, and trauma center type as predictors for propensity to receive PN. Treatment groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weights. Outcomes included hospital length of stay, intensive care unit days, incidence of complications and mortality.

RESULTS

554 children with blunt pancreatic injury were analyzed. PN use declined in adult centers from 2012 to 2016, but remained relatively stable in pediatric centers. Propensity-weighted analysis demonstrated longer median length of stay in patients receiving PN (14 versus 4 days, rate ratio 2.19 [95% CI: 1.97, 2.43]). Children receiving PN also had longer ICU stay (rate ratio 1.73 [95% CI: 1.30, 2.30]). There was no significant difference in incidence of complications or mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PN in children with blunt pancreatic injury that are managed nonoperatively differs between adult and pediatric trauma centers, and is associated with longer hospital stay. Early enteral feeding should be attempted first, with PN reserved for children with prolonged intolerance to enteral feeds.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective cohort.

A retrospective evaluation of nutrition support in relation to clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with an open abdomen

BACKGROUND

Optimising nutrition support in critically ill patients with an open abdomen is challenging.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to (i) quantify the amount and adequacy of nutrition support administered and (ii) determine any relationships that exist between mode of nutrition support delivery and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with an open abdomen.

METHODS

A retrospective review of critically ill patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 h with an open abdomen in a mixed quaternary referral intensive care unit. Enteral and parenteral nutrition (ml) administered daily to patients was recorded for up to 21 days. Length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and duration of mechanical ventilation (days) were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were studied [14 male, 68 y (15-90 y), body mass index 25 kg/m² (11-51 kg/m²), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 20 (7-41), energy goal 1860 kcal/d (1250-2712 kcal/d)]. Patients received 55% (0-117%) of energy goal and 56% (0-105%) protein goal from either enteral or parenteral nutrition. When enteral nutrition was delivered alone or in combination with parenteral nutrition, patients received 48% (0-146%) of their energy and 59% (19-105%) of their protein goal. Patients fed parenteral nutrition, either alone or as supplementary to enteral nutrition (n = 18), received more energy when compared with those who only received enteral nutrition (n = 9) [65 (27-117) vs 49 (15-89) % energy goal, P = 0.025]. Parenteral nutrition was associated with an increased length of stay in hospital [63 (45-156) vs 45 (17-93) d, P = 0.037].

CONCLUSION

Patients with an open abdomen receive about half of their nutrition requirements when fed exclusively via the enteral route. Providing combination enteral and parenteral nutrition to reach nutritional goals may not result in better clinical outcomes for patients with an open abdomen.

Energy, Protein, Carbohydrate, and Lipid Intakes and Their Effects on Morbidity and Mortality in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review

The guidelines for nutritional support in critically ill adult patients differ in various aspects. The optimal amount of energy and nutritional substrates supplied is important for reducing morbidity and mortality, but unfortunately this is not well known, because the topic is complex and every patient is individual. The aim of this review was to gather recent pertinent information concerning the nutritional support of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with respect to the energy, protein, carbohydrate, and lipid intakes and the effect of their specific utilization on morbidity and mortality. Enteral nutrition (EN) is generally recommended over parenteral nutrition (PN) and is beneficial when administered within 24-48 h after ICU admission. In contrast, early PN does not provide substantial advantages in terms of morbidity and mortality, and the time when it is safe and beneficial remains unclear. The most advantageous recommendation seems to be administration of a hypocaloric (<20 kcal · kg^-1 · d^-1), high-protein diet (amino acids at doses of ≥2 g · kg^-1 · d^-1), at least during the first week of critical illness. Another important factor for reducing morbidity is the maintenance of blood glucose concentrations at 120-150 mg/dL, which is accomplished with the use of insulin and lower doses of glucose of 1-2 g · kg^-1 · d^-1, because this prevents the risk of hypoglycemia and is associated with a better prognosis according to recent studies. A fat emulsion is used as a source of required calories because of insulin resistance in the majority of patients. In addition, lipid oxidation in these patients is ∼25% higher than in healthy subjects.

Safety of minimizing preoperative starvation in critically ill and intubated trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Cessation of enteral nutrition prior to an operation/procedure is the most common reason for feeding interruption in critically ill trauma patients and contributes to substantial calorie deficits. This study reports on a strategy to increase calorie intake by continuing feeds until transfer for operations/procedures.

METHODS

Nutrition guidelines were modified in 2006 to allow continuation of feeding in intubated patients up until transfer to the operating room. Prior to 2006, enteral feeding was stopped at least 6 hours prior to surgery. A retrospective cohort design from 2003 to 2010 compared clinical outcomes in groups of adult trauma subjects before and after guideline changes and in subjects at other centers without guideline changes.

RESULTS

During the first week, subjects in the preimplementation cohort (n = 245) received a median of 3,787 kcal per person per week, while subjects in the postimplementation cohort (n = 368) received a median of 6,662 kcal per person per week (p < 0.001). There was no change in calorie intake for subjects at other centers (n = 1,002). The risks of acute respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and mortality were decreased after implementation relative to the preimplementation cohort (acute respiratory distress syndrome: relative risk ratio [RR], 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.81; pneumonia: RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.00; mortality: RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.46-0.99). Ventilator-free days increased by 1.4 days (95% CI, 0.1-2.7), while intensive care unit stay and hospital length of stay were unchanged. These outcomes showed similar trends over time at other participating centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Allowing intubated trauma patients to continue enteral nutrition until transfer for operations or procedures was associated with increased caloric intake without evidence of increased pulmonary complications. This represents an important strategy to reduce calorie deficits in the trauma intensive care unit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study/care management, level III.

Parenteral Nutrition Utilization After Implementation of Multidisciplinary Nutrition Support Team Oversight: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary nutrition teams can help guide the use of parenteral nutrition (PN), thereby reducing infectious risk, morbidity, and associated costs. Starting in 2007 at Harborview Medical Center, weekly multidisciplinary meetings were established to review all patients receiving PN. This study reports on observed changes in utilization from 2005-2010.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients who received PN from 2005-2010 were followed prospectively. Clinical data and PN utilization data were recorded. Patients were grouped into cohorts based on exposure to weekly multidisciplinary nutrition team meetings (from 2005-2007 and from 2008-2010). Patients were also stratified by location, primary service, and ultimate disposition.

RESULTS

In total, 794 patients were included. After initiation of multidisciplinary nutrition meetings, the rate of patients who started PN decreased by 27% (relative risk [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.84). A reduction in the number of patients receiving PN was observed in both the intensive care unit (ICU) and on the acute care floor (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.77 and RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64-0.99, respectively). The rate of patients with short-duration PN use (PN duration of <5 days) declined by 30% in the ICU (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97) and by 27% on acute care floors (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.51-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly multidisciplinary review of patients receiving PN was associated with reductions in the number of patients started on PN, total days that patients received PN, and number of patients who had short-duration (<5 days) PN use.

Performance evaluation of the extra corporeal enteral prosthesis (ECEP) vs a By-Pass

Intestinal stoma constitutes a symptomatic treatment in a wide range of digestive diseases, such as rectal cancer, digestive traumatic perforation and inflammatory intestinal diseases. It affects a patient's life causing physiologic and social constraints. The stoma can lead to involution of the downstream digestive tissue, impairing his function in case of restored continuity. Some technical solutions have been developed in order to maintain intestinal continuity, reduce inflammatory risk and to increase patient's quality of life. In this paper, we describe a smart intestinal prosthesis equipped with a pump working as an intestinal segment and creating a bypass between the upstream and downstream intestinal sides. We also evaluate the performance the digestive prosthesis ECEP vs a simple digestive By-Pass.

Influence of supplemental parenteral nutrition approach on nosocomial infection in pediatric intensive care unit of Emergency Department: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nutritional support for patients in the intensive-care unit (ICU) is a part of standard care which promotes medical quality and decreases nosocomial infection. Supplemental parenteral nutrition (SPN) approach (enteral nutrition (EN) combined with parenteral nutrition (PN) when EN alone is insufficient) has become one major concern in nutrition research field. This research aims to explore the following relationships: (i) the relationship between SPN and nosocomial infection, (ii) the relationship between early and late SPN initiation and the development of nosocomial infection.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in patients who met the inclusion criteria from February 2012 to February 2015 in Pediatric ICU (PICU). Patients were classified into two groups according to nutrition delivery approach-SPN group and EN alone group. Then SPN group were further divided into two subgroups by initiation timing, which were defined as early-initiation SPN and late-initiation SPN group respectively. Age, gender, serum albumin at admission, severity of disease, length of stay in PICU, nutrition delivery approach, amounts of delivered caloric intake and occurence of nosocomial infection were recorded. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to identify the risk factors and assess the independent effect of SPN approach on nosocomial infection in PICU of Emergency Department.

RESULTS

204 patients were included in our study. Compared with EN alone group, patients delivered by SPN approach had a higher nosocomial infection rate (34.0 vs.10.9%, p < 0.001). The late-initiation subgroup of SPN approach was found to be an independent predictor of nosocomial infection in the logistic regression analysis model (OR = 3.40; 95% CI, 1.13 ~ 10.19; p = 0.029). Serum albumin at admission (OR = 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 ~ 0.97; p = 0.008), mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.85; 95% CI, 1.43 ~ 10.39; p = 0.008), severity of disease (OR = 3.79; 95% CI, 1.03 ~ 13.99; p = 0.045) and PICU length of stay (OR = 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11 ~ 1.35; p < 0.001) were also identified as significant risk factors for nosocomial infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows late-initiation SPN approach increases the incidence of nosocomial infection compared with early-initiation approach in critically ill children in PICU of Emergency Department. Compared with EN alone group, patients delivered by SPN approach had a higher nosocomial infection rate.

Feasibility of jejunal enteral nutrition for patients with severe duodenal injuries

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of enteral nutrition (EN) for critically ill trauma patients with severe traumatic duodenal injuries who received placement of concurrent decompressing and feeding jejunostomies.

METHODS

Adult patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit from January 2010 to December 2013, given concurrent afferent decompressing and efferent feeding jejunostomies for severe duodenal injury and provided EN or parenteral nutrition (PN), were retrospectively evaluated. Enteral feeding intolerance was defined as an increase in the decompressing jejunostomy drainage volume output, worsening abdominal distension, or cramping/pain unrelated to surgical incisions. Patients who failed initial EN were transitioned to PN.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Of the 24 patients given EN within the first 2 wk posthospitalization, 18 (75%) failed EN within 2 ± 2 d of initiating EN. EN was discontinued when increases were seen in decompressing jejunostomy drainage volume output (n = 11) and output with abdominal pain and/or distension (n = 6), or abdominal pain/distension was seen without an increase in output (n = 1). Jejunostomy drainage volume output increased from 474 ± 425 mL/d to 1168 ± 725 mL/d (P < 0.001) during EN intolerance. More patients with blunt intestinal injury than those with penetrating injuries (75% versus 15%, respectively; P = 0.035) tolerated EN. Patients initially given PN (n = 13) received more calories (P < 0.005) and protein (P < 0.001) than those given initial EN (n = 13).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients with severe duodenal injuries and concurrent decompressing/feeding tube jejunostomies failed initial EN therapy.

Optimal Nutrition for Acute Rehabilitation in the PICU

Achieving optimal nutrition for a child who is receiving acute rehabilitation in the pediatric intensive care unit requires an individualized approach. Nutrition screening and assessment is necessary to identify children at high risk for complications who require targeted interventions. Early enteral nutrition can improve outcomes, and is thus preferred over parenteral nutrition in the absence of gastrointestinal contraindications. Measurement of caloric requirements with indirect calorimetry is essential to accurately prescribe nutrition support, while monitoring body composition can determine efficacy of nutrition therapies employed. The complex care of critically ill children receiving acute rehabilitation is composed of treatments that compete with delivery of prescribed nutrition. Repeated feeding interruptions can lead to nutrition deficits and prolonged recovery. Nutrition bundles that incorporate evidenced-based nutrition algorithms, methods to overcome nutrition barriers, and nutrition monitoring parameters can direct and optimize nutrition care for critically ill children in need of acute rehabilitation.

Feeding the gut: how, when and with what -- the metabolic issue

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the literature on feeding critically ill patients with special emphasis on the intestine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many dogmas have been questioned in the past few years. In particular, the absence of evidence for impact on outcomes in critically ill patients has been highlighted. So 'early enteral feeding', the trophic effect on intestinal mucosa in humans, 'pharmaco-nutrition', postpyloric feeding and prokinetic drugs have all been found to lack proper evidence to affect outcomes.

SUMMARY

The use of gastric feeding in critical illness is recommended. Successful gastric feeding is indicative of a functional gastrointestinal tract. Pharmacological effects of nutrients are questionable, but supplementation of deficits (glutamine, selenium, etc.) may be in the patient's best interest. A more individualized prescription of nutrition in the critically ill is advocated.

Early versus delayed enteral feeding in patients with abdominal trauma: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Early enteral feeding within 24-48 h of intensive care unit admission is recommended for critically ill patients. This study aimed to determine if early enteral feeding could be safely implemented with purported benefits in patients with abdominal trauma.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed that included 88 adult patients with abdominal trauma. Patients receiving enteral feeding within 72 h of surgical intensive care unit (SICU) admission (early-initiation group, n = 28) were compared to those receiving enteral feeding later (delayed-initiation group, n = 60).

RESULTS

The two groups were comparable in demographic characteristics and injury severity. There were no differences in feeding intolerance (53.6 vs. 43.3%, p = 0.37) and mortality at 28 days (0 vs. 5%, p = 0.55) between the early-initiation group and the delayed-initiation group. However, patients in the early-initiation group had fewer infectious complications (17.9 vs. 40 %, p = 0.04) and shorter length of stay in SICU and hospital (p < 0.01) than patients in the delayed-initiation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Early enteral feeding administered within 72 h of SICU admission was associated with improved clinical outcomes without risk of increasing feeding intolerance in patients with abdominal trauma. Our results support the implementation of early enteral feeding in abdominal trauma management.

Experience with an enteral-based nutritional support regimen in critically ill trauma patients

BACKGROUND

Assuring adequate enteral nutritional support in critically ill patients is challenging. By describing our experience, we sought to characterize the challenges, benefits, and complications of an approach that stresses enteral nutrition.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined nutritional support received by victims of blunt trauma from 8 trauma centers. We grouped patients according to mean daily enteral caloric intake during the first 7 days. Group 1 received the fewest (0 kcal/kg/d) and group 5 the greatest (16 to 30 kcal/kg/d) number of calories in the first week. We focused our analyses on the patients remaining in the ICU for 8 days or longer and compared clinical outcomes among the groups.

RESULTS

There were 1,100 patients in the ICU for 8 days or longer. Patients receiving the greatest number of enteral calories during the first week (group 5) had the highest incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (49%) and the lowest incidence of bacteremia (14%). Use of parenteral nutrition was associated with bacteremia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5), ventilator-associated pneumonia (adjusted odds ratio = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.3), and death (adjusted odds ratio = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Enteral caloric intake during the first week was related to the pattern and severity of injury and was associated with important infectious outcomes. Our observations support moderating enteral intake during the first week after injury and avoiding parenteral nutrition.

Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition

It is a strong and commonly held belief among nutrition clinicians that enteral nutrition is preferable to parenteral nutrition. We provide a narrative review of more recent studies and technical reviews comparing enteral nutrition with parenteral nutrition. Despite significant weaknesses in the existing data, current literature continues to support the use of enteral nutrition in patients requiring nutrition support, over parenteral nutrition.

The evolutionary significance of depression in Pathogen Host Defense (PATHOS-D)

Given the manifold ways that depression impairs Darwinian fitness, the persistence in the human genome of risk alleles for the disorder remains a much debated mystery. Evolutionary theories that view depressive symptoms as adaptive fail to provide parsimonious explanations for why even mild depressive symptoms impair fitness-relevant social functioning, whereas theories that suggest that depression is maladaptive fail to account for the high prevalence of depression risk alleles in human populations. These limitations warrant novel explanations for the origin and persistence of depression risk alleles. Accordingly, studies on risk alleles for depression were identified using PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE to examine data supporting the hypothesis that risk alleles for depression originated and have been retained in the human genome because these alleles promote pathogen host defense, which includes an integrated suite of immunological and behavioral responses to infection. Depression risk alleles identified by both candidate gene and genome-wide association study (GWAS) methodologies were found to be regularly associated with immune responses to infection that were likely to enhance survival in the ancestral environment. Moreover, data support the role of specific depressive symptoms in pathogen host defense including hyperthermia, reduced bodily iron stores, conservation/withdrawal behavior, hypervigilance and anorexia. By shifting the adaptive context of depression risk alleles from relations with conspecifics to relations with the microbial world, the Pathogen Host Defense (PATHOS-D) hypothesis provides a novel explanation for how depression can be nonadaptive in the social realm, whereas its risk alleles are nonetheless represented at prevalence rates that bespeak an adaptive function.

Continuous enteral and parenteral feeding each reduces heart rate variability but differentially influences monocyte gene expression in humans

Enteral (EN) or parenteral (PN) nutrition is used to support critically ill patients until oral feeding resumes. Enteral nutrition is assumed preferable to PN, but the differential influence on immune function is not well defined. Autonomic nervous activity is known to influence innate immune responses, and we hypothesized that EN and PN could influence both autonomic signaling and gene activation in peripheral blood monocytes (PBMs). Ten subjects (aged 18-36 years) received continuous EN or PN for 72 h. Peripheral blood monocytes were isolated from whole blood before and after continuous feeding and were analyzed for gene expression using a microarray platform. Gene expression after feeding was compared from baseline and between groups. To measure autonomic outflow, subjects also underwent heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring during feeding. Time and frequency domain HRV data were compared between groups and five orally fed subjects for changes from baseline and changes over time. During continuous EN and PN, subjects exhibited declines in both time and frequency domain HRV parameters compared with baseline and with PO subjects, indicating a loss of vagal/parasympathetic tone. However, PN feeding had a much greater influence on PBM gene expression compared with baseline than EN, including genes important to innate immunity. Continuous EN and PN are both associated with decreasing vagal tone over time, yet contribute differently to PBM gene expression, in humans. These preliminary findings support assumptions that PN imposes a systemic inflammatory risk but also imply that continuous feeding, independent of route, may impart additional risk through different mechanisms.

Ventilator-associated pneumonia: bacteremia and death after traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

The implications of bacteremia in critically ill patients are uncertain. Some reports suggest bacteremia is linked to higher mortality whereas others do not. These differences may, in part, be because of differences in patient cohorts. To address the potential independent relationship between bacteremia and outcome, we focused on critically ill trauma patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), of whom a significant proportion had concomitant bacteremia. We tested the hypothesis that bacteremia was associated with death in trauma patients who developed VAP.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we measured the incidence of bacteremia associated with VAP and compared the case-fatality rates between patients with and without bacteremia. We adjusted for other mortality risk factors and possible confounders in two ways. First, using forward conditional logistic regression and second, we calculated propensity scores and then adjusted for this score in a regression model.

RESULTS

There were 554 with VAP. Patients with bacteremia had a 26% case-fatality rate (19 of 74 patients). Patients with VAP alone had a case-fatality rate of 12% (56 of 480 patients). The unadjusted relative risk (RR) for death associated with bacteremia was 2.2 (95% confidence interval = 1.4-3.5). After adjusting for age, acute physiology score, and severity of injury, patients with bacteremia had an increased risk of death compared with patients with VAP alone (adjusted odds ratio = 2.65, 95% confidence interval = 1.36-5.17). Our propensity score analysis resulted in a similar association between bacteremia and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

VAP with bacteremia is associated with an increased mortality in comparison with VAP alone after severe traumatic injury.

[Guidelines for specialized nutritional and metabolic support in the critically-ill patient. Update. Consensus of the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units-Spanish Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (SEMICYUC-SENPE): patient with polytrauma]

Patients with polytrauma can be viewed as paradigmatic of the critically-ill patient. These previously healthy patients undergo a life-threatening aggression leading to an organic response that is no different from that in other types of patients. The profile of trauma patients has changed and currently corresponds to patients who are somewhat older, with a higher body mass index and greater comorbidity. Severe injuries lead to intense metabolic stress, posing a risk of malnutrition. Therefore, early nutritional support, preferentially through the enteral route, with appropriate protein intake and glutamine supplementation, provides advantages over other routes and types of nutritional formula. To avoid overnutrition, reduced daily calorie intake can be considered in obese patients and in those with medullary lesions. However, little information on this topic is available in patients with medullary lesions.

Nutrition and the open abdomen

Adequate nutrition support is critical in the management of patients with an open abdomen. Despite the literature supporting its use in trauma patients, provider concerns and clinical controversies remain regarding the early administration and long-term sequelae of enteral nutrition (EN) therapy in these patients. The purpose of this article is to review the clinical concepts behind the use of the open abdomen, as well as examine the altered nutrition requirements associated with the maintenance of a temporary laparostomy. The rationale for early EN is described, as well as the pros and cons surrounding the use of supplemental parenteral nutrition in those patients unable to meet nutrition goals enterally in a reasonable time frame. Finally, an open abdomen nutrition support algorithm is provided as part of the critical care plan in these patients who represent the sickest of surgical patients.

Small intestine mucosal immune system response to injury and the impact of parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

Both humans and mice increase airway immunoglobulin A (IgA) after injury. This protective response is associated with TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 airway increases and in mice is dependent upon these cytokines as well as enteral feeding. Parenteral nutrition (PN) with decreased enteral stimulation (DES) alters gut barrier function, decreases intestinal IgA, and decreases the principal IgA transport protein pIgR. We investigated the small intestine (SI) IgA response to injury and the role of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and PN/DES.

METHODS

Expt 1: Murine kinetics of SI washing fluid (SIWF) IgA; SI, SIWF and serum TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, was determined by ELISA from 0 to 8 hours after a limited surgical stress injury (laparotomy and neck incisions). Expt 2: Mice received chow or PN/DES before injury and SIWF IgA and SI pIgR levels were determined at 0 and 8 hours. Expt 3: Mice received PBS, TNF-α antibody, or IL-1β antibody 30 minutes before injury to measure effects on the SIWF IgA response. Expt 4: Mice received injury or exogenous TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 to measure effects on the SIWF IgA response.

RESULTS

Expt 1: SIWF IgA levels increased significantly by 2 hours after injury without associated increases in TNF-α or IL-1β whereas IL-6 was only increased at 1 hour after injury. Expt 2: PN/DES significantly reduced baseline SIWF IgA and SI pIgR and eliminated their increase after injury seen in Chow mice. Expt 3: TNF-α and IL-1β blockade did not affect the SIWF IgA increase after injury. Expt 4: Exogenous TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 increased SIWF IgA similarly to injury.

CONCLUSION

The SI mucosal immune responds to injury or exogenous TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 with an increase in lumen IgA, although it does not rely on local SI increases in TNF-α or IL-1β as it does in the lung. Similar to the lung, the IgA response is eliminated with PN/DES.

Clinical guidelines and nutrition therapy: better understanding and greater application to patient care

The volume of clinical guidelines produced by national and international societies has virtually exploded in the literature over the past decade. The most important aspect of guidelines is transparency, that is, the connection between the recommendation or guideline statement and the underlying supportive studies from the literature should be transparent. Clinical guidelines should help organize the literature, identify key areas of patient management, and provide a framework with which the clinician may operate. The reader of a guideline should embrace controversy, trace back and review the underlying literature, and then determine whether practice should be altered as a result of the guideline recommendations. The purpose of this article is to understand the derivation of clinical guidelines, to learn how to resolve controversy or differences between guidelines and clinical practice, and to learn steps to apply the guidelines to an individual institution or clinical practice.

Parenteral nutrition in critical illness: can it safely improve outcomes?

Total parenteral nutrition was developed in the 1960s and has since been implemented commonly in the intensive care unit (ICU). Studies published in the 1980s and early 1990s indicate that the use of total parenteral nutrition is associated with increased mortality and infectious morbidity. These detrimental effects were related to hyperglycemia and overnutrition at a period when parenteral nutrition was not administered according to the all-in-one principle. Because of its beneficial effects on the gastrointestinal tract, enteral nutrition alone replaced parenteral nutrition as the gold standard of nutritional care in the ICU in the 1980s. However, enteral nutrition alone is frequently associated with insufficient coverage of the energy requirements, and subsequent protein-energy deficit is correlated with a worse clinical outcome. Recent evidence suggests that all-in-one parenteral nutrition has no significant effect on mortality and infectious morbidity in patients in the ICU if a glycemic control is obtained and hyperalimentation avoided. Thus, the time has come to reconsider the use of parenteral nutrition in the ICU. Supplemental parenteral nutrition could prevent onset of nutritional deficiencies when enteral nutrition is insufficient in meeting energy requirements. Clinical studies are warranted to show that the combination of parenteral and enteral nutrition could improve the clinical outcome of patients in the ICU.

[Treatment of polytrauma in the intensive care unit]

The treatment of severely injured trauma patients (polytrauma) is one of the outstanding challenges in medical care. Early in the initial course the patient's diagnostics have to be scrupulously reevaluated by an interdisciplinary team (tertiary trauma survey) to reduce deleterious sequelae of missed injuries after the initial assessment. Severely injured patients stay in intensive care for an average of 11 days. During this time the patient's therapy has to ensure a high quality evidence-based intensive care treatment and simultaneously has to be tailored to the current individual injuries. Because of the fact that the damage control strategy is gaining increasing acceptance, the intensive care unit plays a pivotal role in the critical time between emergency and elective surgery. Therefore a close cooperation between physicians of the intensive care unit and all surgical disciplines involved is essential to reach the aim of therapeutic efforts. After survival of emergency treatment patients with severe trauma should be reintegrated into social and occupational life as soon as possible.

Parenteral nutrition: a clear and present danger unabated by tight glucose control

BACKGROUND

The infectious risks of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critical illness are well described, although most literature predates tight glucose control (TGC) practice. The authors hypothesized that PN-related complications are ameliorated by TGC and are equivalent to those in enteral nutrition (EN) patients.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit was conducted, comparing PN and EN patients. TGC target was 80 to 110 mg/dL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between infectious outcomes and PN use.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-five patients were studied. Mean daily glucose values were lower for the PN group than for the EN patients (118.2 vs 125.6 mg/dL, P = .002). Nonetheless, the incidence of bloodstream infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection was significantly associated with the administration of PN. In a multivariate logistic regression model, PN was associated with a >4-fold increase in the odds of having a catheter-related bloodstream infection (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-17.49; P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the successful implementation of TGC, PN is still a significant risk factor for infectious complications among surgical intensive care unit patients.

Nutrition and clinical outcome in intensive care patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the setting of ICU, the characteristics of patients have changed during the last decade. Patients are older, frequently overweight or obese, present with more chronic diseases and undernutrition. These conditions are characterized by reduced muscle mass and vulnerable homeostasis. This review sustains the hypothesis that an early and optimal nutritional support, combining enteral and parenteral nutrition, could improve the clinical outcome of ICU patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

The combination of stress and undernutrition observed in the ICUs is associated with negative energy balance, which leads to lean body mass loss. Catabolism of lean body mass has been repeatedly associated with a worsening of the clinical outcome, increased length of hospital stay, recovery and healthcare costs. Early enteral nutrition is the recommended feeding route in ICU patients, but it is often unable to fully cover the nutritional needs. Parenteral nutrition is recommended if enteral nutrition is not feasible.

SUMMARY

It is hypothesized that supplemental parenteral nutrition, together with insufficient enteral nutrition, could optimize the nutritional therapy by preventing the onset of early energy deficiency, and thus, could allow to reduce the side-effects of undernutrition and promote better chances of recovery after the ICU stay.

Trauma sepsis

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in the trauma patient. Sepsis following traumatic injury is related to the type of injury, together with the extent of injury and the anatomical location. Burn injuries are associated with the highest risk of sepsis. The diagnosis of sepsis in the trauma patient remains difficult. Interpretation of abnormal results is key to successful diagnosis, particularly in conjunction with clinical findings. This review will consider the specific features of sepsis in the context of trauma relating to epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis and management.

Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient

A 67-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoes extensive resection of the small bowel and right colon with a jejunostomy and colostomy because of mesenteric ischemia. In the surgical intensive care unit, severe systemic inflammatory response syndrome with possible sepsis develops. The patient is treated with volume resuscitation, vasopressor support, mechanical ventilation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and intravenous insulin infusion. Low-dose tube feedings are initiated postoperatively through a nasogastric tube. However, these feedings are discontinued after the development of escalating vasopressor requirements, worsening abdominal distention, and increased gastric residual volume, along with an episode of emesis. The hospital nutritional-support service is consulted for feeding recommendations. A discussion with the patient's family reveals that during the previous 6 months, she lost approximately 15% of her usual body weight and decreased her food intake because of abdominal pain associated with eating. Her preoperative body weight was 51 kg (112 lb), or 90% of her ideal body weight. The physical examination reveals mild wasting of skeletal muscle and fat. Blood tests show hypomagnesemia, hypophosphatemia, and normal hepatic and renal function. Central venous parenteral nutrition is recommended.