Impact of Advanced Age in Lung Transplantation: An Analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing Data

Risk of recipient age on 1-year mortality after simultaneous heart-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) is relatively uncommon, and there is a paucity of literature to suggest an age at which older recipients may be exposed to excess risk for mortality. This analysis aimed to identify a threshold of age that predicts adverse outcomes after HLTx.

METHODS

The United Network of Organ Sharing registry was used to identify adult patients undergoing HLTx from 2005 to 2021. The primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Threshold regression was used to identify the threshold at which age impacts 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to model survival, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used for risk-adjustment.

RESULTS

We identified 453 patients undergoing HLTx. Threshold analysis identified that the risk for 1-year mortality was significantly elevated beyond an age of 58 years, and 47 (10.38%) patients were older than this threshold. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, 1-year survival was significantly lower in patients > 58 years compared to younger recipients (64.7% vs. 82.0%, p = .007). After risk adjustment, the hazard ratio for 1-year mortality in recipients older than 58 years was 2.27 (95% confidence interval [1.21-4.28], p = .011).

CONCLUSION

A threshold for recipient age of 58 years of age may avoid excess 1-year mortality after HLTx. However, patients older than this threshold demonstrate acceptable early and midterm survival, and the majority survive to 1 year. Advanced age should be considered in patient selection for HLTx, but may not be a contraindication for candidacy particularly in the absence of other risk factors.

Favorable, arduous or fatal postoperative pathway within 90 days of lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The maximum gain in quality of life after lung transplantation (LT) is expected between six months and one year after LT, as the occurrence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction may mask the beneficial effects beyond one year. Thus, the postoperative period could be the cornerstone of graft success. We sought to describe the factors present before postoperative admission to the ICU and associated with favorable, arduous or fatal pathway within 90 days of LT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study between January 2015 and December 2020. Using multinomial regression, we assessed the demographic, preoperative and intraoperative characteristics of patients associated with favorable (duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation < 3 days and alive at Day 90), arduous (duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation ≥ 3 days and alive at Day 90) or fatal (dead at Day 90) pathway within 90 days of LT.

RESULTS

A total of 269 lung transplant patients were analyzed. Maximum graft cold ischemic time ≥ 6 h and intraoperative blood transfusion ≥ 3 packed red blood cells were associated with arduous and fatal pathway at Day 90, whereas intraoperative ECMO was strongly associated with fatal pathway.

CONCLUSION

No patient demographics influenced the postoperative pathway at Day 90. Only extrinsic factors involving graft ischemia time, intraoperative transfusion, and intraoperative ECMO determined early postoperative pathway.

The outcome of lung transplantation for end-stage pulmonary diseases with pulmonary hypertension: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Lung transplantation is a treatment for end-stage lung disease. The optimal transplant strategy for patients with end-stage lung disease complicated by pulmonary hypertension (PH) is controversial. The aim of this study is to review this experience and analyze the outcomes of lung transplantation for PH.

METHODS

This retrospective study collected data on patients with PH undergoing lung transplantation between March 2016 and December 2019 at a single center in China. The perioperative features and short- and medium-term outcomes between single-lung transplantation (SLT) and double-lung transplantation (DLT) were compared. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze overall survival across a variety of transplantation procedures, age, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), body mass index (BMI), and indications of transplantation.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients with PH were finally included in the analysis. The mean age, mean BMI, and mPAP were 56.37 years, 19.56 kg/m², and 35.4 mmHg respectively. The overall 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival was 70%, 63%, and 60%, respectively. Five (7.94%) patients died within 30 days after surgery and nine patients (14.3%) died from infection during the followed-up period. There were no significant differences in the short- and medium-term survival outcomes of SLT and DLT, but postoperative pulmonary function was better in DLT. Patients older than 60 years of age had worse survival (P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and medium-term survival outcomes between SLT and DLT are similar in selected patients with PH. DLT provides better pulmonary function. Patients older than 60 years are associated with worse survival.

Lung transplantation in the septuagenarian can be successfully performed though long-term results impacted by diseases of aging

BACKGROUND

Advanced age is considered a risk factor for lung transplantation (LTX). We sought to evaluate the long-term outcomes of LTX in the septuagenarian.

METHODS

LTX recipients in the UNOS transplant registry (May 1, 2005 to June 12, 2020) were stratified into 18-59, 60-69, and > = 70 years of age. Recipient and transplant characteristics were evaluated for survival, cause of death (COD), length of stay (LOS), and complications. A Kaplan-Meier analysis examined long-term survival for all patients stratified by age, specifically looking at cause of death.

RESULTS

A total of 27632 recipients were identified. As recipients aged, we found a decrease in proportion of cystic fibrosis and an increase in restrictive disease while obstructive disease peaked in the 60-69yo cohort (p<0.001). Septuagenarians had higher rates of single LTX, male gender and white race (p<0.001). Older recipients had significantly longer donor recovery distances traveled with paradoxical shorter ischemic times, shorter hospital LOS and were transplanted at higher volume centers. There was no difference with in-hospital mortality among groups (p = 0.5). Acute rejection during initial hospitalization, rejection within 1 year, and post-transplant dialysis incidence decreased with age. Graft failure was a common COD in younger patients while malignancy and cardio/cerebrovascular diseases were common COD in > = 70yo.

CONCLUSION

Select septuagenarian LTX candidates may be safely transplanted with relatively few complications. Immunosenescence and conditions of the aged are likely contributing factors to the decreased rejection and graft failure observations. Septuagenarians should not be excluded from LTX consideration based solely on age. Transplantation in septuagenarians should only be done in very selected patients (screened for malignancies and atherosclerotic disease) and these recipients should be carefully followed after transplantation because of these risk factors. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Outcomes after lung transplantation in recipients aged 70 years or older

BACKGROUND

The proportion of lung transplant (LTx) recipients older than 70 years is increasing, thus we assessed long-term survival after LTx in this cohort relative to younger counterparts.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent LTx between 2012 and 2016 at our center and divided patients by age: group A (<65 years), B (65-69 years), and C (≥70 years). Survival statistics were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

The study included 375 LTx recipients: 221 (58.9%) in group A, 109 (29.1%) in group B, and 45 (12.0%) in group C. Group C was mostly men (37/45 [82.2%]; P = 0.003) and had the highest mean serum creatinine at listing (P = 0.02). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after transplant in group A (93.2%, 70.1%, 58.8%) was significantly higher than group B (83.5%, 59.6%, 44.0%; P = 0.005, 0.028, 0.006, log-rank test) and was similar to group C (86.7%, 64.4%, 57.8%), although trended higher at 1 year (P = 0.139, 0.274, 0.489, log-rank test). Groups B and C had comparable survival at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Although survival decreased after age 65, long-term survival was comparable between LTx recipients aged 65-69 years and recipients ≥70 years.

Antithymocyte globulin is associated with a lower incidence of de novo donor-specific antibody detection in lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience

Purpose

Induction immunosuppression has improved the long‐term outcomes after lung transplant. This is the first report exploring the association of induction immunosuppression with the development of de novo donor‐specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) in lung transplant recipients (LTR).

Methods

Sixty‐seven consecutive primary LTR were followed for 3 years posttransplant. A total of 41/67 (61%) LTR‐received induction immunosuppression using a single dose of rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG; 1.5 mg/kg) within 24 h of transplant. All recipients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch on the day of transplant. Serum samples at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months posttransplant were assessed for the presence of de novo HLA DSA.

Results

De novo HLA DSA were detected in 22/67 (32.8%) LTR within 1‐year posttransplant. Of these, 9/41 (21.9%) occurred in the induction therapy group and 13/26 (50%) in the noninduction group. Class II DSA were detected in 3/41 (7.3%) LTR who received induction compared to 9/26 (34.6%) LTR without induction immunosuppression (p = .005). Differences in overall survival or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction rates between the two groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Induction immunosuppression utilizing a modified regimen of single‐dose rATG is associated with a significant reduction in de novo DSA production in LTR.

The Lung Allocation Score and Its Relevance

Lung transplantation in the United States, under oversight by the Organ Procurement Transplantation Network (OPTN) in the 1990s, operated under a system of allocation based on location within geographic donor service areas, wait time of potential recipients, and ABO compatibility. On May 4, 2005, the lung allocation score (LAS) was implemented by the OPTN Thoracic Organ Transplantation Committee to prioritize patients on the wait list based on a balance of wait list mortality and posttransplant survival, thus eliminating time on the wait list as a factor of prioritization. Patients were categorized into four main disease categories labeled group A (obstructive lung disease), B (pulmonary hypertension), C (cystic fibrosis), and D (restrictive lung disease/interstitial lung disease) with variables within each group impacting the calculation of the LAS. Implementation of the LAS led to a decrease in the number of wait list deaths without an increase in 1-year posttransplant survival. LAS adjustments through the addition, modification or elimination of covariates to improve the estimates of patient severity of illness, have since been made in addition to establishing criteria for LAS value exceptions for pulmonary hypertension patients. Despite the success of the LAS, concerns about the prioritization, and transplantation of older, sicker individuals have made some aspects of the LAS controversial. Future changes in US lung allocation are anticipated with the current development of a continuous distribution model that incorporates the LAS, geographic distribution, and unaccounted aspects of organ allocation into an integrated score.

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors and skin cancer risk in nonrenal solid organ transplant recipients: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of malignancy compared with the general population. Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors have been used as immunosuppressants in transplant recipients. There remains a lack of evidence of this treatment in nonrenal solid organ transplantation. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effects of mTOR inhibitors on secondary nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) malignancies in nonrenal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Eligible studies for the present systematic review and meta-analysis included those in which patient cohorts underwent heart, liver, lung, and pancreas (i.e. nonrenal solid organ) transplantation, with treatment group being those treated with an mTOR inhibitor such as sirolimus or everolimus, and control group being placebo, or alternative non-mTOR inhibitor treatment such as calcineurin inhibitors or as per standard treatment protocol.

RESULTS

From the six included studies, we found no significant difference in the odds of either primary or secondary NMSC (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.41-1.29, P = 0.28). Pooled analysis of patients with secondary NMSC demonstrated a trend toward significant benefit with mTOR inhibitor treatment (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.02, P = 0.06) but no protective effect for primary NMSC (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.03-9.96, P = 0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in nonrenal transplant recipients, mTOR inhibitors may have a protective effect against secondary NMSC but not primary NMSC posttransplantation. Extrapolating the findings of reduced NMSC in renal transplant populations to nonrenal transplant cases should be cautioned.

Extremes of Age Decrease Survival in Adults After Lung Transplant

BACKGROUND

Age has been implicated as a factor in the plateau of long-term survival after lung transplant.

METHODS

We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify all recipients of lung transplant aged ≥18 years of age between January 1, 2006, and February 19, 2015. A total of 14,253 patients were included in the analysis. Survival was estimated using a nonproportional hazard model and random-survival forest methodology was used to examine risk factors for death. Final selection of model variables was performed using bootstrap aggregation. Age was analyzed as both a continuous and categorical variable (age <30, 30-55, and >55 years). Risk factors for death were obtained for the entire cohort and additional age-specific risk factors were identified for each age category.

RESULTS

The median age at transplant was 59 years. There were 1,098 (7.7%) recipients <30 years, 4,201 (29.5%) 30 to 55 years, and 8,954 (62.8%) >55 years of age. Age was the most significant risk factor for death at all time-points following transplant and its impact becomes more prominent as time from transplant increases. Risk factors for death for all patients included extremes of age, higher creatinine, single lung transplant, hospitalization before transplant, and increased bilirubin. Risk factors for death differed by age with social determinants of health disproportionately affecting survival for those in the youngest age category.

CONCLUSIONS

The youngest and oldest adult recipients experienced the lowest posttransplant survival through divergent pathways that may present opportunities for intervention to improve survival after lung transplant.

Single Versus Bilateral Lung Transplantation for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis in the Lung Allocation Score Era

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive and fatal disease. Lung transplantation is the only therapy associated with prolonged survival. The ideal transplant procedure for IPF is unclear. Outcomes after single transplantation (SLTx) versus bilateral lung transplantation (BLTx) in IPF patients after introduction of the Lung Allocation Score were examined.

METHODS

Records of patients undergoing lung transplantation for IPF at our institution between May 2005 and March 2017 were reviewed to examine the effect of transplant laterality. Primary outcomes were overall, rejection-free, and bronchiolitis obliterans (BOS)-free survival at 1 and 5 years post-transplant.

RESULTS

Lung transplantation was performed in 151 IPF patients post-Lung Allocation Score. Most recipients were male with average age 59 ± 8 years. SLTx was performed in 94 patients (62%). In the overall cohort, comparative survival between SLTx and BLTx was similar at 1 and 5 years before and after adjusting for age and pulmonary hypertension (PH). SLTx was associated with shorter ventilator time and intensive care unit stay and trended toward improved survival over BLTx in patients without PH.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of SLTx versus BLTx in IPF did not correspond to significantly different survival adjusting for age and PH. BLTx was associated with prolonged postoperative ventilation and length of stay compared with SLTx. Patients without PH, all older patients, and patients with PH and advanced disease should be considered for SLTx for IPF.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension in the elderly: Clinical perspectives

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a rare and devastating disease characterized by progressive increases in pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, which eventually leads to right ventric-ular failure and death. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (World Health Organization Group I), a subset of PH, and may be idiopathic in nature or associated with other systemic conditions and is thought to most commonly effect women, the majority of whom are of childbearing age. However, PAH in the elderly population is being increasingly diagnosed creating clinical considerations that had once not been considered. Often in an elderly population the diagnosis of PAH may be delayed due to chronic comorbid conditions such as coronary artery disease or other dyspneic conditions. Though survival and clinical outcomes have improved, the elderly population continues to have disproportionately lower survival rates. High clinical suspicion of PAH warrants a complete diagnostic workup with right heart catheterization. Upon diagnosis, PAH specific therapy should be initiated with possible drug interactions in mind. Adjuvant pulmonary rehabilitation should be considered as a conservative measure with definitive results. Finally, psychosomatic aspects of the disease should also be considered in elderly populations.

Five-Year Mortality Hazard Is Reduced In Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients Receiving Double- versus Single-Lung Transplants

BACKGROUND

Previous studies suggest double-lung transplant (DLT) may be associated with superior survival compared to single-lung transplantation (SLT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) recipients. The purpose of this study was to compare survival in patients with COPD undergoing DLT versus SLT since the inception of the lung allocation score.

METHODS

We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to retrospectively identify adult patients with COPD who underwent isolated lung transplantation from 5/4/2005-12/31/2014. We then separated patients into DLT versus SLT. Short-term (1 y) and long-term survival (5 y) were compared between DLT and SLT cohorts by the method of Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to adjust for case mix.

RESULTS

Four thousand eight hundred thirty-two COPD patients were listed, and 3554 underwent lung transplantation over the study period, including 1358 SLTs (38%) and 2196 DLTs (62%). Survival 1 y after listing was 93% for those remaining wait listed (n = 1892) versus 91% for SLT (n = 1093) versus 89% for DLT (n = 1847) (log-rank P < 0.01). Survival at 1 y after transplant was 88% for both SLT and DLT groups (log-rank P = 0.93); however, 5-y survival was significantly lower after SLT (51% versus 59%, log-rank P < 0.01). After risk adjustment, hazard for 1-y mortality after DLT was not significantly reduced compared to SLT (hazard ratio 0.89 [0.69-1.14], P = 0.36) but was significantly reduced 5 y after DLT (hazard ratio 0.88 [0.78-0.99], P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In the largest survival analysis of COPD recipients since the inception of the lung allocation score, the hazard for 5-y mortality was significantly reduced in recipients who underwent DLT as compared to SLT.

Impaired Renal Function Should Not Be a Barrier to Transplantation in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated an association between pretransplantation renal dysfunction (PRD) and increased mortality after lung transplantation (LT). The purpose of this study was to determine whether PRD impacts survival after LT in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

METHODS

We queried the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to identify all adult (≥18 years) recipients with CF who underwent isolated LT from May 4, 2005 to December 31, 2014. We separated recipients into those with and those without PRD (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≤60 mL/min). We excluded patients who required dialysis before transplantation. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess unadjusted survival differences. Cox proportional hazards modeling was then performed across 26 variables to assess the risk-adjusted impact of PRD on 1-, 3-, and 5-year mortality.

RESULTS

Isolated LT was performed on 1,830 patients with CF; 17 patients were excluded because of pretransplantation dialysis. Eighty-two of 1,813 patients (4.5%) had PRD (GFR ≤60 mL/min). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no survival differences between PRD and non-PRD groups at 1 year (85.3% versus 89.5%; log-rank p = 0.23), 3 years (71.0% versus 72.5%; p = 0.57), or 5 years (63.3% versus 59.8%; p = 0.95). After risk adjustment, PRD was not independently associated with an increased hazard for mortality at 1 year (hazard ratio [HR], 1.38 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-2.58]; p = 0.31), 3 years (HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.92-2.24]; p = 0.11), or 5 years (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 0.86-1.94]; p = 0.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Although PRD has historically served as a relative contraindication to LT, our study is the first to suggest that among CF recipients, PRD was not associated with increased hazard for mortality out to 5 years after LT.

Perioperative factors associated with 1-year mortality after lung transplantation: a single-center experience in Korea

Background

Most studies about the risk factors of 1-year mortality after lung transplantation were performed on non-Asians. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative factors related to the 1-year mortality after lung transplantation in Korea.

Methods

Sixty-eight consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation without preoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment at 1 tertiary hospital in South Korea between October 24, 2012, and October 16, 2015, were analyzed retrospectively.

Results

Forty-four patients (64.7%) lived for >1 year after lung transplantation. The median age of all patients was 55 years (range, 16-75 years), and men accounted for 57.4%. The major cause of lung transplantation was idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (48.5%); the other causes were interstitial lung disease related to connective tissue disease (17.6%) and bronchiolitis obliterans after stem cell transplantation (14.7%). In univariate analysis, higher median age (52 vs. 61.5 years, P<0.001), male sex (45.5% vs. 79.2%, P=0.007), lower preoperative albumin level (<3 g/dL) (22.7% vs. 45.8%, P=0.049), need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) after surgery (4.5% vs. 37.5%, P=0.001), and postoperative delta neutrophil index (DNI) >5.5 higher than the preoperative DNI (22.7% vs. 70.8%, P<0.001) were significantly related to 1-year mortality. After adjustments, old age, postoperative increased DNI, and need for RRT after transplantation were the independent perioperative risk factors for 1-year mortality after lung transplantation.

Conclusions

Recipients with advanced age should be carefully selected, and patients who need RRT or with increased DNI after transplantation should be managed accordingly.

Lung transplantation in the elderly: Influence of age, comorbidities, underlying disease, and extended criteria donor lungs

OBJECTIVE

As large registries show an increased risk for lung transplant recipients aged 60 years or more, few single centers report favorable outcomes for carefully selected older recipients without providing essential details. The purpose of our study was to determine variables that influence survival in the elderly.

METHODS

All adult bilateral first lung transplants between January 2000 and December 2014 were divided in 2 groups: those aged less than 60 years (N = 223) and those aged 60 years or more (N = 83). The Charlson-Deyo Index determined recipient comorbidities. The Oto Donor Score assessed donor lung quality.

RESULTS

Recipients aged 60 years or more had a significant lower median survival compared with their younger counterparts (48 vs 112 months, respectively, P < .001). Recipient age was as an exponentially increasing univariate risk factor for mortality. By adjusting for variables in multivariate analysis, this trend was nonsignificant. The displacing variables were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.2), Charlson-Deyo Index 2 or greater (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8), systemic hypertension (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6), gastroesophageal reflux (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1), diverticulosis (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.7), and an Oto Donor Score 8 or greater (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0). All of these risk factors were significantly more likely to occur in recipients aged 60 years or more, except for a tendency for high Charlson-Deyo Index.

CONCLUSIONS

The comorbidity profile, underlying disease, and donor lung quality appear to be more important than age in reducing long-term survival. Older age serves as a marker for a complex constellation of factors that might be considered the relative or absolute contraindication to lung transplantation rather than age, per se.

Simulated Regionalization of Heart and Lung Transplantation in the United States

We simulated the impact of regionalization of isolated heart and lung transplantation within United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) regions. Overall, 12 594 orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) patients across 135 centers and 12 300 orthotopic lung transplantation (OLT) patients across 67 centers were included in the study. An algorithm was constructed that "closed" the lowest volume center in a region and referred its patients to the highest volume center. In the unadjusted analysis, referred patients were assigned the highest volume center's 1-year mortality rate, and the difference in deaths per region before and after closure was computed. An adjusted analysis was performed using multivariable logistic regression using recipient and donor variables. The primary outcome was the potential number of lives saved at 1 year after transplant. In adjusted OHT analysis, 10 lives were saved (95% confidence interval [CI] 9-11) after one center closure and 240 lives were saved (95% CI 209-272) after up to five center closures per region, with the latter resulting in 1624 total patient referrals (13.2% of OHT patients). For OLT, lives saved ranged from 29 (95% CI 26-32) after one center closure per region to 240 (95% CI 224-256) after up to five regional closures, but the latter resulted in 2999 referrals (24.4% of OLT patients). Increased referral distances would severely limit access to care for rural and resource-limited populations.

Effects of Recipient Age and Diagnosis on Health-related Quality-of-Life Benefit of Lung Transplantation

RATIONALE

The average age of lung transplant recipients is increasing, and the mix of recipient indications for transplantation is changing.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether the health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) benefit of lung transplantation differs by recipient age and diagnosis.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we obtained serial HRQL measurements in adults with advanced lung disease who subsequently underwent lung transplantation (2004-2012). HRQL assessments included the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), EQ-5D, Standard Gamble, and Visual Analog Scale for current health. We used linear mixed effects models for associations between age or diagnosis and changes in HRQL with transplantation. To address potential survivorship bias, we fitted Markov models to the distribution of discrete post-transplant health states (HRQL better than pretransplant, not better, or dead) and estimated quality-adjusted life-years post-transplant.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 430 subjects were listed, 387 were transplanted, and 326 provided both pretransplant and post-transplant data. Transplantation conferred large improvements in all HRQL measures: St. George's change of -47 units (95% confidence interval, -48 to -44), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey physical component summary score of 17.7 (16.5-18.9), EQ-5D of 0.27 (0.24-0.30), Standard Gamble of 0.48 (0.44-0.51), and Visual Analog of 44 (42-47). Age was not associated with meaningful differences in the HRQL benefits of transplantation. There was less HRQL benefit in interstitial lung disease than in cystic fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation confers large HRQL benefits, which vary by recipient diagnosis, but do not differ substantially in older recipients.

Recipient risk factors and lung transplant outcomes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Scientific and technical developments in the field of lung transplantation have allowed it to become a successful treatment option for various end-stage lung diseases. As the demand for lung allografts increases and waitlists expand, it is vital that lung transplant centers optimize use of this limited resource by selecting recipients who have the best prospects of positive long-term outcomes. Recipient selection criteria vary across transplant selection committees. We review the most recent body of literature for recipient consideration and describe potential effects on morbidity and mortality posttransplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although prior guidelines for contraindications to lung transplantation have been described, the benchmarks for recipient selection are constantly being challenged. Age, weight, and psychologic condition of recipients pretransplant have more recently been shown to have significant influence on posttransplant outcomes. Advancements in human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation have additionally impacted recipient selection standards.

SUMMARY

Recipient selection criteria continue to evolve because of advances in mechanical bridging to transplant and postoperative management. This review will cover some of the new concepts in lung transplant recipient selection and their potential effect on posttransplant outcomes.

A novel risk score that incorporates recipient and donor variables to predict 1-year mortality in the current era of lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

In this study we sought to construct a novel scoring system to pre-operatively stratify a patient's risk of 1-year mortality after lung transplantation (LTx) based on recipient- and donor-specific characteristics.

METHODS

The UNOS database was queried for adult (≥18 years) patients undergoing LTx between May 1, 2005 and December 31, 2012. The population was randomly divided in a 4:1 fashion into derivation and validation cohorts. A multivariable logistic regression model for 1-year mortality was constructed within the derivation cohort. Points were then assigned to independent predictors (p < 0.05) based on relative odds ratios. Risk groups were established based on score ranges.

RESULTS

During the study period, 9,185 patients underwent LTx and the 1-year mortality was 18.0% (n = 1,654). There was a similar distribution of variables between the derivation (n = 7,336) and validation (n = 1,849) cohorts. Of the 14 covariates included in the final model, 9 were ultimately allotted point values (maximum score = 70). The model exhibited good predictive strength (c = 0.65) in the derivation cohort and demonstrated a strong correlation between the observed and expected rates of 1-year mortality in the validation cohort (r = 0.87). The low-risk (score 0 to 11), intermediate-risk (score 12 to 21) and high-risk (score ≥22) groups had a 10.8%, 17.1% and 32.0% risk of mortality (p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first scoring system that incorporates both recipient- and donor-related factors to predict 1-year mortality after LTx. Its use could assist providers in the identification of patients at highest risk for poor post-transplant outcomes.

Contemporary analysis of early outcomes after lung transplantation in the elderly using a national registry

BACKGROUND

With an increasing number of potential recipients and a comparatively static number of donors, lung transplantation (LT) in the elderly has come under significant scrutiny. Previous studies have been limited by single-center experiences with small population sizes and often mixed results. Using a national registry, we sought to evaluate the following: (1) differences in survival outcomes in septuagenarians compared with sexagenarians; and (2) the effect of temporal trends on the development of other comorbidities in this population.

METHODS

We analyzed the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) data files from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database to identify recipients who underwent LT between the years 2000 and 2013. The study period was divided into two equal eras. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, we compared the 30-day, 3-month, 1-year, 3-year and 5-year patient survival between septuagenarians and sexagenarians in both eras. Separate multivariate analyses were performed to estimate the risk of renal failure, risk of rejection and length of hospital stay (LOS) post-LT in each of these time periods.

RESULTS

A total of 6,596 patients were identified comprising 1,726 (26.2%) during 2000 to 2005 and 4,870 (73.8%) during 2006 to 2012. In the "early era," 32 (1.9%) septuagenarians and 1,694 (98.1%) sexagenarians underwent LT, whereas 543 (11.1%) septuagenarians and 4,327 (88.9%) sexagenarians underwent transplantation in the "latter era." A comparison of patient survival between the two groups in the early era revealed no difference at 30 days (95.7% vs 93.8%, p = 0.65). However, 3-month (91.2% vs 75%, p = 0.04) and 1-year patient survival (79.5% vs 62.5%, p = 0.048) were both lower in the septuagenarian group. In the later era, however, there were no differences in 30-day (96.2% vs 96.8, p = 0.5), 3-month (92.7% vs 91.9%, p = 0.56) or 1-year (81.7% vs 78.6%, p = 0.12) patient survival between the two age groups. Survival rates at 3 years (63.7% vs 49.3%, p < 0.001) and 5 years (47.5% vs 28.2%, p < 0.001) were each significantly lower in the septuagenarian group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, LT outcomes for the elderly have improved significantly over time and early outcomes in the modern era rival those found in younger recipients.

[Contraindications to lung transplantation: evolving limits?]

In France, the higher frequency of pulmonary sample in organ donors and the enhancement of surgical and perioperative life support techniques, have increased the number procedures and the short term prognosis of lung transplantation (LT). In this setting, the classical contraindications of LT need to be reconsidered. In this article, some of the classical contraindication of LT are confronted to the experience acquired in other solid organ transplantations or from some LT centers. Specific situations such as LT in patients with previous cancer, HIV infection, viral hepatitis, nutritional disorders, acutely ill LT candidates and aging candidates are addressed. Surgical contraindications are not reviewed.

Prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease in patients undergoing lung transplantation: case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Coronary angiography is commonly performed prior to lung transplantation, but its utility is unproven.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients referred for coronary angiography as part of a pre-operative evaluation for lung transplantation and reviewed the literature for prior series.

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients, 48 men and 41 women were included. Obstructive (≥70% stenosis) CAD was present in 9 (10%), non-obstructive (<70% stenosis) CAD in 24 (27%), and no angiographic evidence of CAD in 56 (63%) patients. We found 13 previously published series in the literature, in which a total of 1998 patients underwent coronary angiography pre-lung transplant. Together with our 89 patients, obstructive CAD was found in 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, given the low prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients referred for lung transplantation, the inherent risk of angiography, and unproven benefit of detection of obstructive CAD, the utility of routine coronary angiography in this population requires validation in prospective studies.

Functional status after lung transplantation in older adults in the post-allocation score era

This manuscript describes the functional status trajectory of older (age 65 or older) and younger (age 18-64) adults after lung transplantation (LT). After the implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) in 2005, older adults became the fastest growing subgroup of recipients. Yet the impact of LT on physical function, a main determinant of quality of life in older adults, is unknown. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using United Network for Organ Sharing data on 4805 adults who received a LT during 2005-2009. We divided them into older (≥65; n = 774) and younger (18-64; n = 4031) cohorts. Functional status was measured by Karnofsky performance score (KPS). Mixed models estimated the impact of age group on the rate of functional decline starting at 1 year posttransplantation. We controlled for KPS at transplantation, gender, race, diagnosis, LAS and LT type. Age group was not associated with different rates of decline in KPS over time. On average, recipients who were older, received a single LT, or had a low KPS at transplantation had worse functional status posttransplantation when compared to their counterparts, but rarely reached disability at 48 months. Overall, LT had a positive and durable effect on physical function for both older and younger recipients.

Solid-organ transplantation in older adults: current status and future research

An increasing number of patients older than 65 years are referred for and have access to organ transplantation, and an increasing number of older adults are donating organs. Although short-term outcomes are similar in older versus younger transplant recipients, older donor or recipient age is associated with inferior long-term outcomes. However, age is often a proxy for other factors that might predict poor outcomes more strongly and better identify patients at risk for adverse events. Approaches to transplantation in older adults vary across programs, but despite recent gains in access and the increased use of marginal organs, older patients remain less likely than other groups to receive a transplant, and those who do are highly selected. Moreover, few studies have addressed geriatric issues in transplant patient selection or management, or the implications on health span and disability when patients age to late life with a transplanted organ. This paper summarizes a recent trans-disciplinary workshop held by ASP, in collaboration with NHLBI, NIA, NIAID, NIDDK and AGS, to address issues related to kidney, liver, lung, or heart transplantation in older adults and to propose a research agenda in these areas.

Selecting lung transplant candidates: where do current guidelines fall short?

In 2010, 1770 lung transplant procedures were performed in the USA, yet 2469 new candidates were added to the waiting list the same year. The shortage of suitable donor lungs requires that transplant professionals select patients for lung transplantation only if they are likely to sustain a survival benefit from the procedure. However, 20% of lung transplant recipients die within the first year of transplantation, suggesting that we are failing to identify those at high risk for severe early complications. In this perspective, we review the current guidelines for the selection of lung transplant candidates, which are based largely on expert opinion and small case series. We also propose the study of new extrapulmonary factors, such as frailty and sarcopenia, that might help improve the prediction of complications and early death after lung transplantation, leading to an improved candidate selection process.

Epidemiology and management of common pulmonary diseases in older persons

Pulmonary disease prevalence increases with age and contributes to morbidity and mortality in older patients. Dyspnea in older patients is often ascribed to multiple etiologies such as medical comorbidities and deconditioning. Common pulmonary disorders are frequently overlooked as contributors to dyspnea in older patients. In addition to negative impacts on morbidity and mortality, quality of life is reduced in older patients with uncontrolled, undertreated pulmonary symptoms. The purpose of this review is to discuss the epidemiology of common pulmonary diseases, namely pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, lung cancer, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in older patients. We will review common clinical presentations for these diseases and highlight differences between younger and older patients. We will also briefly discuss risk factors, treatment, and mortality associated with these diseases. Finally, we will address the relationship between comorbidities, pulmonary symptoms, and quality of life in older patients with pulmonary diseases.

Elderly Transplant Recipients

While the total number of organs transplanted in this country has increased over the years, there is still an ever-widening gap between the need for organs and our capacity to meet that need as the overall waiting list continues to grow. This is due in part to significant advances in transplant techniques and outcomes such that Americans with organ failure now seek transplants in greater numbers. Additionally, life-expectancy gains in the United States are creating an aging population who are more likely to suffer organ failure than younger Americans. The national transplant waiting list has continued to shift toward older candidates. The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) reported that at the end of 2007, 59.7% of all 97,248 candidates on the waiting list for all organs were 50 years old or older, and 14.9% were 65 years or older. These percentages are substantially higher than they were in 1998 (41.5 and 8.1%, respectively) [1].

Workshop on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in older adults

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a heterogeneous disease with respect to clinical presentation and rates of progression, disproportionately affects older adults. The diagnosis of IPF is descriptive, based on clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic examination, and definitive diagnosis is hampered by poor interobserver agreement and lack of a consensus definition. There are no effective treatments. Cellular, molecular, genetic, and environmental risk factors have been identified for IPF, but the initiating event and the characteristics of preclinical stages are not known. IPF is predominantly a disease of older adults, and the processes underlying normal aging might significantly influence the development of IPF. Yet, the biology of aging and the principles of medical care for this population have been typically ignored in basic, translational, or clinical IPF research. In August 2009, the Association of Specialty Professors, in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Geriatrics Society, the National Institute on Aging, and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, held a workshop, summarized herein, to review what is known, to identify research gaps at the interface of aging and IPF, and to suggest priority areas for future research. Efforts to answer the questions identified will require the integration of geriatrics, gerontology, and pulmonary research, but these efforts have great potential to improve care for patients with IPF.

Lung transplantation in the United States, 1999-2008

This article highlights trends and changes in lung and heart-lung transplantation in the United States from 1999 to 2008. While adult lung transplantation grew significantly over the past decade, rates of heart-lung and pediatric lung transplantation have remained low. Since implementation of the lung allocation score (LAS) donor allocation system in 2005, decreases in the number of active waiting list patients, waiting times for lung transplantation and death rates on the waiting list have occurred. However, characteristics of recipients transplanted in the LAS era differed from those transplanted earlier. The proportion of candidates undergoing lung transplantation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease decreased, while increasing for those with pulmonary fibrosis. In the LAS era, older, sicker and previously transplanted candidates underwent transplantation more frequently compared with the previous era. Despite these changes, when compared with the pre-LAS era, 1-year survival after lung transplantation did not significantly change after LAS inception. The long-term effects of the change in the characteristics of lung transplant recipients on overall outcomes for lung transplantation remain unknown. Continued surveillance and refinements to the LAS system will affect the distribution and types of candidates transplanted and hopefully lead to improved system efficiency and outcomes.

Disease-specific approach to lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The present review provides an update on the recent literature regarding disease-specific issues in lung transplantation. Some of the published data will help refine previously published candidate selection criteria and provide evidence-based data for choice of procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies on lung transplant outcomes in older patients underline that satisfactory results can be obtained in patients older than 60 years but not in patients older than 70 years. Data from two large registry-based studies indicate that bilateral lung transplantation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease confers significantly longer survival than single lung transplantation, especially in patients younger than 60 years. Mathematical models to estimate survival benefit in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease lung transplant candidates have been developed and are being validated. The impact of Bcc colonization in cystic fibrosis patients on outcome has been nuanced; thus, cystic fibrosis lung transplant candidates colonized by particular Bcc strains may be transplanted with good outcomes. Novel surgical approaches to peculiar situations in end-stage cystic fibrosis have been described. Candidate selection criteria for retransplantation procedures have further been clarified.

SUMMARY

This article attempts to provide an overview of some of the currently important topics for clinicians involved in referring and evaluating patients with end-stage lung disease for lung transplantation in 2009.

[Indications and contraindications to lung transplant: patient selection]

Lung transplant (LT) is a valid treatment for patients with end-stage lung disease such as cystic fibrosis, emphysema, pulmonary fibrosis and pulmonary arterial hypertension (85% of indications) and for selected candidates. The "good recipient" was introduced early to a specialised center, has had complete pre-LT assessment and complete information. At the end of this assessment, the absolute contraindications were eliminated (cardiovascular pathologies, recent neoplasia, active viral diseases, severe psychiatric disorders), advanced age risks were discussed, co-morbidities to treat were listed and an individualised therapeutic pre-LT program has been decided (based on exercise and muscle rehabilitation, nutritional support, anti-infectious treatments, active management of co-morbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, gastro-esophageal reflux…) with a psychological follow-up if necessary. Timely inscription on waiting list must be decided, early enough to avoid extreme handicap or risk pre-LT death, but not too early to have a survival benefit linked to LT. Death without LT prognosis criteria are still studied, and even if they do not fully define the risk of death of an individualised patient, they are taken into account by the recommendations of the societies; since 2006, LT indications are based on severity criteria of the selected patient, defined for each recipient diagnosis. LT aims to improve survival and quality of life of the patient, and this is especially true when the patient is referred, prepared and monitored early enough by the transplant team; the aim is to limit the risk of death before LT (before listing and on waiting list) and early post-LT morbimortality.

[Medical complications of lung transplantation]

In 2010, lung transplantation is a valuable therapeutic option for a number of patients suffering from of end-stage non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases. The patients frequently regain a very good quality of life, however, long-term survival is often hampered by the development of complications such as the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, metabolic and infectious complications. As the bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the first cause of death in the medium and long term, an intense immunosuppressive treatment is maintained for life in order to prevent or stabilize this complication. The immunosuppression on the other hand induces a number of potentially severe complications including metabolic complications, infections and malignancies. The most frequent metabolic complications are arterial hypertension, chronic renal insufficiency, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and osteoporosis. Bacterial, viral and fungal infections are the second cause of mortality. They are to be considered as medical emergencies and require urgent assessment and targeted therapy after microbiologic specimens have been obtained. They should not, under any circumstances, be treated empirically and it has also to be kept in mind that the lung transplant recipient may present several concomitant infections. The most frequent malignancies are skin cancers, the post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, Kaposi's sarcoma and some types of bronchogenic carcinomas, head/neck and digestive cancers. Lung transplantation is no longer an exceptional procedure; thus, the pulmonologist will be confronted with such patients and should be able to recognize the symptoms and signs of the principal non-surgical complications. The goal of this review is to give a general overview of the most frequently encountered complications. Their assessment and treatment, though, will most often require the input of other specialists and a multidisciplinary and transversal approach.

Factors indicative of long-term survival after lung transplantation: a review of 836 10-year survivors

INTRODUCTION

Despite 20 years of lung transplantation (LTx), factors influencing long-term survival remain largely unknown. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data set provides an opportunity to examine long-term LTx survivors.

METHODS

We conducted a case-control study embedded within the prospectively collected UNOS LTx cohort to identify 836 adults from 1987 to 1997 who survived >or=10 years after first LTx. LTx patients within the same era and surviving 1 to 5 years served as controls. Multivariable logistic regression with incorporation of spline terms evaluated the odds of being a 10-year survivor. Two separate models were constructed. Model A incorporated pre-operative, operative, and donor-specific factors. Model B incorporated the factors used in Model A with post-operative covariates. Additional outcomes evaluated included hospitalizations for infection, rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans.

RESULTS

Of 4,818 LTx patients from 1987 to 1997, 836 (17.3%) survived >or=10 years with a mean follow-up of 148.8 +/- 21.6 months. Mean follow-up for 1,657 controls was 34.0 +/- 13.9 months. The distribution of 10-year survivors by disease was cystic fibrosis, 170 (20%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 254 (30%); and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 92 (11%). On multivariable logistic regression, significant factors influencing 10-year survival included age <or=35 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.11; p = 0.01), bilateral LTx (OR. 1.71; 95% CI, 1.25-2.34; p = 0.001), and hospitalizations for infections (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27-1.54; p < 0.001) and for rejection (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48-0.65; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Examination of a cohort of long-term LTx survivors in the UNOS data set indicates that bilateral LTx and fewer hospitalizations for rejection may portend improved long-term survival after LTx.