Prevalence of Vision Loss and Associations With Age-Related Eye Diseases Among Nursing Home Residents Aged ≥65 Years

Factors associated with health-related quality of life among people with visual impairments living in nursing homes in Armenia: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

The study aimed to examine the effect of visual impairment (VI), eye diseases, and other risk factors on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in nursing home residents in Armenia.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study administered an interviewer-administered structured questionnaire to collect information about socio-demographics, chronic diseases, HRQoL, smoking, receiving and giving instrumental/emotional social support, and sleeping disorders among 313 nursing home residents. An ophthalmic examination of the participants was conducted.

RESULTS

The mean age was 72.5 years, ranging from 45.5 to 91.4. Women constituted 50% of the sample. The prevalence of normal vision by presenting visual acuity with available correction was 55.3%, while VI and blindness were present in 40.8% and 3.9%, respectively. Uncorrected refractive error (URE) was found in 20% of participants. The mean HRQoL score was 51.3, ranging from 7.9 to 95.0. In the adjusted analysis, having at least one chronic non-communicable disease, sleeping disorders, eye diseases, URE, VI, blindness, and giving instrumental social support were associated with HRQoL.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular eye care services could improve the eye health and HRQoL of nursing home residents. Interventions addressing vision loss and chronic non-communicable diseases could enhance the functioning and overall well-being of the target population.

A Nomogram for Predicting Vision-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy Among Mild Diabetic Retinopathy Patients: A Case-Control and Prospective Study of Type 2 Diabetes

AIM

This study aims to develop a nomogram for predicting vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy (VTDR) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with mild non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In case-control analysis, 440 patients with mild NPDR or VTDR were enrolled to identify predictors and develop a nomogram. In the prospective cohort, 120 T2DM patients with mild NPDR were enrolled for external validation. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the predictive performance of the nomogram.

RESULTS

In case-control analysis, 2-h C-peptide (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75 to 0.95, p = 0.006), sural nerve conduction impaired (SNCI) (mildly: OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.10 to 4.33, p = 0.026; moderately/severely: 3.66, 95% CI: 1.74 to 7.70, p < 0.001) and UACR (microalbuminuria: OR = 2.37, 95% CI: 1.25 to 4.48, p = 0.008; macroalbuminuria: 4.02, 95% CI: 1.61 to 10.06, p = 0.003) were identified as independent predictors. The concordance index of the prediction nomogram was 0.76 in the training set. In the test set, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 84.8%, 60.6%, and 0.73, respectively. In the prospective cohort, median follow-up period was 42 months, and 15 patients (12.5%) developed VTDR. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of prediction were 66.7%, 89.5%, and 0.75, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Introducing 2-h C-peptide, UACR, and SNCI, the nomogram demonstrated a good discriminatory power for predicting risk of VTDR in mild NPDR individuals.

Risk Factors for Vision Loss among Nursing Home Residents: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Approximately 2% of older adults currently live in nursing homes. It is important that the risks for vision loss be characterized to ensure appropriate vision care is provided for nursing home patients. Our objective was to evaluate the association of age-related eye diseases (AREDs) and multimorbidities with vision loss.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a cross-sectional analysis of comprehensive eye examination records for 7753 residents of 74 North Carolina nursing homes who were ≥65 years of age at time of the initial patient visit.

METHODS

Complete data on vision and associated factors were included from the standardized Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services eye examination. We defined vision impairment and blindness respectively as best-corrected visual acuity between 20/40 and 20/200, and 20/200 or worse. Clinical diagnoses of AREDs were defined by the attending clinician. Data were extracted from electronic health records, and all analyses were conducted in SAS v 9.4. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the resident characteristics and AREDs and logistic regression analysis to examine independent risk factors for vision impairment.

RESULTS

A total of 7753 initial eye examination records with complete data were included in the analysis. Overall, 34% of the residents had normal vision, 43% had vision impairment, and 23% were blind. Among participants with various AREDs, the prevalence of vision impaired/blind ranged from 63% to 76%, while blindness ranged from 23% to 53%. We found correction of refractive error alone served to reduce vision impairment or blindness.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Comprehensive eye examinations showed vision impairment and blindness affected 66% of nursing home residents, overall. This study substantiates the positive impact of comprehensive eye examinations to promote visual, systemic, and cognitive health and well-being and the need that eye care service be used to inform policy and practice to improve patient functioning and independence.

Prevalence of sensory impairments in home care and long-term care using interRAI data from across Canada

BACKGROUND

In the general population, sensory impairments increase markedly with age in adults over 60 years of age. We estimated the prevalence of hearing loss only (HL), vision loss only (VL), and a combined impairment (i.e., dual sensory loss or DSL) in Canadians receiving home care (HC) or long-term care (LTC).

METHODS

Annual cross-sectional analyses were conducted using data collected with one of two interRAI assessments, one used for the HC setting (n = 2,667,199), and one for LTC (n = 1,538,691). Items in the assessments were used to measure three mutually exclusive outcomes: prevalence of VL only, HL only, or DSL. Trends over time for each outcome were examined using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. A negative binomial model was used to quantify the trends over time for each outcome while adjusting for age, sex and province.

RESULTS

In HC, there was a significant trend in the rate for all three outcomes (p < 0.001), with a small increase (roughly 1%) each year. In HC, HL was the most prevalent sensory loss, with a rate of roughly 25% to 29%, while in LTC, DSL was the most prevalent impairment, at roughly 25% across multiple years of data. In both settings, roughly 60% of the sample was female. Males in both HC and LTC had a higher prevalence of HL compared to females, but the differences were very small (no more than 2% in any given year). The prevalence of HL differed by province after adjusting for year, age and sex. Compared to Ontario, Yukon Territory had a 26% higher rate of HL in HC (relative rate [RR] = 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.11, 1.43), but LTC residents in Newfoundland and Labrador had a significantly lower rate of HL (RR: 0.57; CI: 0.43, 0.76).When combined, approximately 60% of LTC residents, or HC clients, had at least one sensory impairment.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory impairments are highly prevalent in both HC and LTC, with small sex-related differences and some variation across Canadian provinces. The interRAI assessments provide clinicians with valuable information to inform care planning and can also be used to estimate the prevalence of these impairments in specific population sub-groups.

Disparities in Vision Health and Eye Care

Significant disparities in vision health and eye care exist. To achieve health equity, we must understand the root causes and drivers of health disparities and inequities, including social determinants of health and systemic racism.

Prevalence of Eye Conditions, Utilization of Eye Health Care Services, and Ophthalmic Medications After Entering Residential Aged Care in Australia

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the burden and trends of eye diseases, utilisation of eye health care services, and ophthalmic medications among older people living in residential aged care facilities in Australia.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the Registry of Senior Australians. Individuals aged ≥65 years who entered permanent residential aged care facilities between 2008 and 2015 were included. The prevalence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of eye diseases by year, eye health care services, and ophthalmic medication use within a year of entry into the service were evaluated. Poisson regression models estimated adjusted rate of change using prevalence ratio (PR) by age, sex, state, and frailty scores.

Results

Of the 409,186 people studied, 43.6% (N = 178,367) had an eye condition. Of the total cohort, 32.9% (N = 134,566) had chronic eye conditions and 19.7% (N = 80,661) had an acute eye condition. Common chronic eye conditions were glaucoma (13.6%, N = 55,830), cataract (8%, (N = 32,779), blindness (4.5%, N = 18,856), and poor vision (10.3%, N = 42,245). Prevalence of any eye condition (2008: 42.7%, 95% CI = 42.2%-43.2% and 2015: 41.2%, 95% CI = 40.8-41.6%, PR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.99-0.99, P < 0.001), acute eye conditions (2008: 19.8%, 95% CI = 19.4%-20.2% and 2015: 17.4%, 95% CI = 17.1%-17.6%, PR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.97-0.98, P < 0.001), and blindness (2008: 5.2%, 95% CI = 5.0%-5.4% and 2015: 3.7%, 95% CI = 3.5%-3.9%, PR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.93-0.94, p < 0.001). decreased over the study period. The prevalence of glaucoma (2008: 13.5%, 95% CI = 13.2%-13.8% and 2015: 13.8%, 95% CI = 13.5%-13.7%; PR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.99-1.10, P < 0.001) and cataract (2008: 7.4%, 95% CI = 7.2%-7.7% and 2015: 8.5%, 95% CI = 8.3%-8.7%, PR = 1.00, 95% CI = 1.00-1.01, P < 0.001) remained stable or slightly increased. Overall, 46.4% (N = 82,769) of individuals with eye conditions, accessed at least one eye health service within the first year of entering residential care and 70.5% (N = 125,673) used at least one ophthalmic medication. Optometric services (41.7%, N = 74,358) were the most used eye health care services and anti-infective eye drops (37.2%, N = 66,331) were the most commonly dispensed medications.

Conclusions

The prevalence of blindness among older Australian using residential aged care services decreased over the study period. However, the burden of eye diseases remained high between 2008 and 2015, whereas the use of eye health care services was disproportionately low. This study provides evidence of a significant need for eye health care services for older people with an eye disease in residential aged care facilities.

Translational Relevance

Four in ten long term aged care residents in Australia had at least one eye condition over the study period, indicating potential for a high eye health care needs in aged care settings.

The Economic Burden of Vision Loss and Blindness in the United States

PURPOSE

To estimate the economic burden of vision loss (VL) in the United States and by state.

DESIGN

Analysis of secondary data sources (American Community Survey [ACS], American Time Use Survey, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey [MEPS], National and State Health Expenditure Accounts, and National Health Interview Survey [NHIS]) using attributable fraction, regression, and other methods to estimate the incremental direct and indirect 2017 costs of VL.

PARTICIPANTS

People with a yes response to a question asking if they are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses in the ACS, MEPS, or NHIS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We estimated the direct costs of medical, nursing home (NH), and supportive services and the indirect costs of absenteeism, lost household production, reduced labor force participation, and informal care by age group, sex, and state in aggregate and per person with VL.

RESULTS

We estimated an economic burden of VL of $134.2 billion: $98.7 billion in direct costs and $35.5 billion in indirect costs. The largest burden components were NH ($41.8 billion), other medical care services ($30.9 billion), and reduced labor force participation ($16.2 billion), all of which accounted for 66% of the total. Those with VL incurred $16 838 per year in incremental burden. Informal care was the largest burden component for people 0 to 18 years of age, reduced labor force participation was the largest burden component for people 19 to 64 years of age, and NH costs were the largest burden component for people 65 years of age or older. New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Vermont experienced the highest costs per person with VL. Sensitivity analyses indicate total burden may range between $76 and $218 billion depending on the assumptions used in the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported VL imposes a substantial economic burden on the United States. Burden accrues in different ways at different ages, leading to state differences in the composition of per-person costs based on the age composition of the population with VL. Information on state variation can help local decision makers target resources better to address the burden of VL.