Dose-Response Relationship Between Life-Space Mobility and Mortality in Older Japanese Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study

Association of the interaction between daily step counts and frailty with disability in older adults

The differences in the association of objectively measured physical activity with disability between frail and non-frail older adults remain unclear. We (1) evaluated the dose-dependent relationship between daily steps and disability in older adults with and without frailty and (2) examined the interaction between steps and frailty status in relation to the risk of disability. This prospective study used data from 4065 adults aged ≥ 65 years from the Kyoto-Kameoka Study, Japan. The mean daily step count obtained using triaxial accelerometers across ≥ 4 days was recorded. Frailty was evaluated using the validated Kihon Checklist. Disability was identified using the long-term care insurance system's nationally unified database, with data collected until November 30, 2016. Overall, 385 disabilities were recorded during a median follow-up period of 3.32 years (12,855 person-years). After adjusting for confounders, an inverse association was observed between daily step count and disability risk. The disability risk plateaued at 5,000-7,000 steps/day in non-frail people, whereas step counts showed an almost linear inverse relationship with disability risk in frail people. Low step counts (< 5,000 steps) in frail people were more strongly associated with disability risk than were high step counts (≥ 5,000 steps) in non-frail people. The additive interaction between steps and frailty was associated with the relative excess risk of disability in frail people with low step counts (p for interaction = 0.015). The relationship between daily steps and disability differs between older adults with and without frailty, and the adverse effects of frailty on disability risk depend on physical activity.

Life-Space Mobility and Frailty in Older Japanese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVES

Some studies reported a relationship between life-space mobility (LSM) and frailty assessed by physical aspects; however, a more comprehensive discussion of frailty is underdeveloped. In addition, previous studies have focused only on older Euro-American people. Therefore, we aimed to examine LSM-frailty relationships in community-dwelling older Japanese persons using physical and comprehensive frailty indices.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We used the data of 8898 older adults from a baseline survey of the Kyoto-Kameoka Study in Japan.

METHODS

The validated life-space assessment (LSA) was used to evaluate LSM and categorized it into quartiles. Two validated indices were used to evaluate frailty: the Kihon Checklist (KCL) and the simple Frailty Screening Index (FSI). Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the relationships between LSM scores and frailty.

RESULTS

The mean age (SD) of the participants was 73.4 (6.3) years, and 53.3% were women. The mean LSM score of the study participants was 53.0. The prevalence of frailty by KCL and FSI was 40.7% and 16.8%, respectively. Significant differences between LSM score and frailty prevalence were observed [KCL: Q1, reference; Q2, odds ratio (OR) 0.53, 95% CI 0.45-0.62; Q3, OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.25-0.35; Q4: OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.18-0.26, P for trend <.001; FSI: Q1, reference; Q2, OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.48-0.68; Q3: OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.31-0.46; Q4: OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28-0.42, P for trend <.001]. Similar results were observed when LSM scores were examined at 10-point intervals, with LSM and frailty exhibiting an L-shaped relationship. The LSM score dose-response curve at which the OR for frailty plateaued among older individuals was approximately 81-90 score.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

LSM score and frailty prevalence exhibited L-shaped relationships in community-dwelling older persons. This study's findings provide useful data for setting LSM targets for preventing frailty in community-dwelling older persons.

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic and life-space mobility in older adults

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the physical health of older adults around the world, causing day-to-day disruptions in routines and changes to usual patterns of mobility. Despite the passing of 2 years since vaccinations, older adults continue to experience detriments, including social isolation and reduced mobility. This study aims to understand how views of the COVID-19 pandemic are associated with life-space mobility-moving about the community. We hypothesize that endorsing stronger perspectives about the persistence of COVID-19 is correlated with reduced life-space mobility.

METHODS

Survey data were collected via online questionnaire in October and November of 2022. Linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between five perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., agreeing that "I wish people would take COVID-19 more seriously") and life-space mobility, measured using a modified version of the life space assessment, in older adults (n = 510). Analyses were adjusted for demographic factors and mental and physical health indicators, including depressive symptoms and number of chronic conditions.

RESULTS

In fully adjusted models, the study found that endorsing a stronger lingering impact of the COVID-19 pandemic across any of the five perspectives was associated with significantly lower life-space mobility.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study show that endorsing a stronger lingering impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is associated with reduced life-space mobility, which underscores the importance of designing public health strategies that carefully balance the safety concerns of older adults with opportunities for physical activity and social interaction.

Oral frailty is associated with mortality independently of physical and psychological frailty among older adults

BACKGROUND

Although oral frailty is independently associated with an increased risk of mortality, evidence for the usefulness of screening tools for oral frailty is less than that for physical frailty screening tools. We aimed to investigate the relationship between oral frailty and mortality in older adults.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included 11,374 adults aged ≥65 years, who provided valid responses to a baseline mail survey questionnaire from the Kyoto-Kameoka study. Oral frailty status was evaluated using the Oral Frailty Index-8 (range, 0 [best] to 10 [worst]). Participants were classified into four categories according to the Oral Frailty Index-8: robust (score, 0-2), oral pre-frailty (score, 3), oral frailty (score, 4-6), and oral severe frailty (score ≥ 7). Physical and psychological frailty were evaluated using the validated frailty-screening index and defined as a score of ≥3 out of a possible 5 points. Mortality data were collected from 30 July 2011 to 30 November 2016. Hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

During the 5.3-year median follow-up period (57,157 person-years), 1184 deaths were recorded. After adjusting for confounders, including physical and psychological frailty, medical history, and lifestyle, in comparison with a robust oral status, oral pre-frailty (HR, 1.29; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.63), oral frailty (HR, 1.22; 95 % CI, 1.01-1.48), and oral severe frailty (HR, 1.43; 95 % CI, 1.16-1.76) were associated with higher HRs of mortality (p for trend = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Oral frailty is associated with mortality independent of physical and psychological frailty in older adults. The Oral Frailty Index-8 may be useful for identifying individuals at high risk of mortality.

Longitudinal changes in life-space mobility and autonomy in participation outdoors among Finnish community-dwelling older adults from pre-COVID-19 to through the pandemic

BACKGROUND

Among older people, community mobility was reduced at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, but the longer-term changes are unclear.

AIMS

To study lower extremity performance and car driving as predictors of changes in older adults' life-space mobility, autonomy in participation outdoors, and the risk of developing restricted life-space mobility from 2017 to 2022.

METHODS

Life-space mobility (scoring range 0-120) and autonomy in participation outdoors (scoring range 0-20) were assessed in community-dwelling individuals (n = 657) in 2017-2018 (baseline age 75, 80, or 85 years), during the first wave of COVID-19 in 2020, and in 2021-2022. Lower extremity performance was assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery, and car driving was self-reported at baseline. Data were analysed using generalized estimating equations and Cox regression.

RESULTS

During the first wave of COVID-19 in 2020, life-space mobility decreased on average by 10.3 (SD 21.6) points and partially recovered in 2021-2022 (+ 2.7, SD 21.8). The same pattern was observed for autonomy in participation outdoors. Non-drivers and those with impaired lower extremity performance had a 2.4-to-3.6-fold adjusted risk of developing restricted life-space mobility over the follow-up period compared to drivers with intact lower extremity performance.

CONCLUSIONS

For older people, the recovery of community mobility was incomplete after the restrictions stemming from the pandemic were lifted. Older adults with impaired lower extremity performance and who did not drive were particularly vulnerable to developing restricted life-space mobility, a situation that could lead to social isolation and reduced well-being.

The level of life space mobility among community-dwelling elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple countries have conducted surveys on the level of life space mobility for community-dwelling elderly through the Life-Space Assessment, the results vary greatly, from 41.7 to 88.6. However, there is no meta-analysis on the current situation of community-dwelling elderly life space mobility.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the global level of life space mobility for community-dwelling elderly, to identify potential covariates such as geographical regions, survey years, gender, and age that contribute to the heterogeneity between the studies, and to identify the dynamic trend based on survey years.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Two reviewers searched the following 8 electronic bibliographic databases from inception until May 28, 2023: PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Database, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, WanFang, and Weipu Database.

REVIEW METHODS

This review was conducted using the Stata 14.1 and R 4.3.1. The Cochrane's Q statistical and I2 index were used to test for heterogenicity and assess the degree of heterogenicity, respectively. Studies were appraised using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for the quality of cross-sectional studies, cohort studies, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies were selected from databases and reference lists. The pooled score of Life-Space Assessment was 66.84 (95% CI: 63.30-70.39) and the prevalence of restricted life space was 42% (95% CI: 0.27-0.57). The geographical regions, survey years, gender were found to be a significant covariate of the pooled score of life space mobility estimate in the subgroup analysis. The mean score of Life-Space Assessment gradually achieved stability after 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

The life space mobility of community-dwelling elderly in the global is at a moderate level, with 42% of them experiencing restricted life space. South America, females and earlier survey years have a lower level of life space mobility. In the future, the government should identify vulnerable groups for targeted intervention to promote the level of LSM in the community-dwelling elderly.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO [CRD42023443054].

Combined Use of Sleep Quality and Duration Is More Closely Associated With Mortality Risk Among Older Adults: A Population-based Kyoto-Kameoka Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Whether sleep quality and duration assessed from multiple domains, either individually or in combination, are strongly associated with mortality risk in older adults remains unelucidated. We aimed to clarify these relationships.

METHODS

We enrolled 7,668 older (age ≥65 years) Japanese adults in the Kyoto-Kameoka prospective cohort study who provided valid responses to the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in a mail-in survey. Sleep quality and duration were classified into six groups using the previously validated PSQI: short sleep duration (SSD: <360 min/day)/sleep disturbance (SD: ≥5.5 PSQI points), n = 701; SSD/non-sleep disturbance (NSD: <5.5 PSQI points), n = 100; optimal sleep duration (OSD: 360-480 min/day)/NSD, n = 1,863; OSD/SD, n = 2,113; long sleep duration (LSD: >480 min/day)/NSD, n = 1,972; LSD/SD, n = 919. Mortality data were collected from February 15, 2012, to November 30, 2016. We evaluated the relationship between all-cause mortality risk and sleep quality and duration (and their combinations) using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model that included baseline covariates.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 4.75 years (34,826 person-years), with a total of 616 deaths. After adjusting for confounders, compared with other groups, SSD/SD and LSD/SD had the highest hazard ratio (HR) of mortality (SSD/SD: HR 1.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.19; SSD/NSD: HR 1.27; 95% CI, 0.47-3.48; OSD/NSD: reference; OSD/SD: HR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91-1.59; LSD/NSD: HR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.77; LSD/SD: HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.37-2.45). However, mortality risk was not associated with the interaction between sleep quality and duration.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with sleep disturbances involving SSD and LSD have a strong positive association with mortality risk, suggesting an additive effect between sleep quality and duration.

Life-space mobility among community-dwelling older persons: A scoping review

To describe and analyze the current research status of life-space mobility of the older persons in community. The literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, EBSCOhost, Scopus, OpenGrey, SinoMed, CNKI, WanFang, and VIP databases was computer searched, and the time frame was build to May 23, 2023. A total of 42 literatures were included, including 35 in English and 7 in Chinese, 30 of which were cross-sectional studies. Theoretical models related to spatial mobility included the "concentric circles" model and the "cone" model. 33 literatures reported the prevalence or level of spatial mobility limitations, and 9 assessment instruments were used, The influencing factors can be divided into four categories. 9 literatures reported on the adverse effects, and 9 literatures reported on the prevention and intervention. The limitation of life-space mobility is a common and under-recognized phenomenon among the older persons in the community,with serious adverse effects, complex and diverse influencing factors.

Factors associated with life-space mobility restriction in home-care older adults receiving home-visit rehabilitation: A cross-sectional multi-center study in Japan

AIM

Life-space mobility (LSM) restriction is a serious issue among older adults using home-visit rehabilitation (HR). This study evaluated physical function, transportation, and other factors not comprehensively tested in previous studies and examined factors associated with the restriction of LSM among older adults using HR.

METHODS

This cross-sectional multi-center study recruited 88 HR users (49 men, 39 women, mean age 79.0 [±7.8] years) living in urban and rural areas from August to October 2020. We administered the Life-Space Assessment (LSA), the Self-Efficacy Scale on Going out among community-dwelling Elderly (SEGE), grip strength, a 30-s chair stand test, Bedside Mobility Scale, Functional Independence Measure, Frenchay Activities Index (FAI), Ikigai-9, and Home and Community Environment (HACE) test. Participants were divided into two groups based on the cut-off value of the LSA scores. In the logistic regression analysis, the dependent variable was LSA scores ≤30, and the independent variables were measured based on objective evaluation items and adjusted for confounding factors (age, sex, and frequency of use of day-care services).

RESULTS

Restriction of LSM was significantly associated with FAI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.817, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.706-0.945), HACE facilitators (OR = 1.558, 95% CI = 1.168-2.079), and living alone (OR = 12.822, 95% CI = 1.202-136.716).

CONCLUSION

Restriction of LSM is associated with environmental factors, such as assistive devices and household composition, and ability to engage in instrumental activities of daily living. Our findings indicate a great need for focusing on these factors among home-care older adults receiving HR. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 722-728.

Association between excess mortality in depressive status and frailty among older adults: A population-based Kyoto-Kameoka prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Frailty has been shown to be a mediator of the risk of excess death due to depression in older adults, although this relationship has not been sufficiently investigated. Our objective was to evaluate this relationship.

METHODS

We used data from 7,913 Japanese people aged≥65 years who participated in the Kyoto-Kameoka prospective cohort study and who provided valid responses to the Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and the World Health Organization-Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) in mail-in surveys. Depressive status was assessed using the GDS-15 and WHO-5. Frailty was evaluated using the Kihon Checklist. Data on mortality were collected from February 15, 2012, to November 30, 2016. We evaluated the relationship between depression and all-cause mortality risk using a Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

The prevalence of depressive status assessed by GDS-15 and WHO-5 was 25.4% and 40.1%, respectively. In total, 665 deaths were recorded during a median follow-up period of 4.75 years (35,878 person-years). After adjusting for confounders, we found that depressive status assessed by the GDS-15 had a higher risk of mortality than those without it (hazard ratio [HR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.91). This association was moderately weaker when adjusted for frailty (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.73). Similar results were observed when depression was assessed with the WHO-5.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that the risk of excess death due to depressive status in older adults may be partially explained by frailty. This indicates a need to focus on improving frailty besides conventional depression treatments.

Dose-Response Relationships between Diet Quality and Mortality among Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults: A Population-Based Kyoto-Kameoka Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Although better diet quality is inversely associated with mortality risk, the association between diet quality and mortality remains unclear in frail and non-frail older adults. Thus, we aimed to examine this association in older Japanese adults.

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We used the data of 8,051 Japanese older adults aged ≥65 years in the Kyoto-Kameoka study.

MESUREMENTS

Dietary intake was estimated using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Diet quality was evaluated by calculating the adherence scores to the Japanese Food Guide Spinning Top (range, 0 [worst] to 80 [best]), which were stratified into quartiles. Frailty status was assessed using the validated self-administered Kihon Checklist (KCL) and the Fried phenotype (FP) model. Survival data were collected between February 15, 2012 and November 30, 2016. Statistical analysis was performed using the multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis and the spline model.

RESULTS

During the median 4.75-year follow-up (36,552 person-years), we recorded 661 deaths. After adjusting for confounders, compared with the bottom adherence score quartile, the top quartile was associated with lower hazard ratio (HR) of mortality in frailty (HR, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-1.00) and non-frailty, as defined by the KCL (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-1.01). In the spline model, regardless of frailty status defined by the KCL and FP model, adherence score showed a strongly dose-dependent inverse association with mortality up to approximately 55 points; however, no significant differences were observed thereafter. This association was similar to the results obtained in individuals with physical, cognitive, and depression as domains of KCL in the spline model.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate an L-shaped association between diet quality and mortality in both frail and non-frail individuals. This study may provide important knowledge for improving poor diet quality in older individuals with frailty or domains of frailty.

Patterns of participation restriction among older adults at risk of falls and relationship with intrinsic capacity: A latent cluster analysis

Introduction

The concept of participation restriction was first described by the World Health Organization in 2001 as a component of The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework. Both falls and fear of falling (FOF) are associated with social isolation, depression, anxiety, poor quality of life and cognitive impairment resulting in participation restriction. Life-space mobility (LSM) is an important indicator for participation restriction which depends on multiple inter-related factors. We aimed to determine participation patterns using latent cluster analysis (LCA) in older adults at risk of falls, its relationship with intrinsic capacity (IC) and its risk prediction.

Methods

Cross-sectional study of 154 community dwelling older adults ≥ 60 years with falls or risk of falls was conducted. Questionnaires were administered on demographics, hearing, LSM, frailty (FRAIL scale), anorexia of aging (SNAQ), cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA), FOF (Falls Efficacy Scale-International), physical function, and assessment for handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed, 5-times sit to stand (STS), vision and times-up-and-go (TUG) were performed. Six IC domains (vision and hearing, cognition, nutrition, mobility and depression) were measured.

Results

Three pattern of participation cluster were identified, high (n = 63, 40.9%), moderate (n = 83, 53.9%) and low (n = 8, 33 5.2%). Individuals in the high participation cluster were significantly younger, had higher LSM scores and lower FES-I scores, more robust, fewer ADL and IADL limitations, lower prevalence of low HGS, higher gait speed and shorter TUG. In the fully adjusted model compared to the high participation cluster, moderate participation was significantly associated with low MoCA scores (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.7-10.4, p = 0.02), poor STS (OR 7.1, 95% CI 3.0-17.0, p < 0.001) whereas low participation was associated with anorexia of aging (OR 9.9, 95% CI 1.6-60.9, p = 0.014), poor STS (OR 19.1, 95% CI 2.0-187.5, p = 0.011) and hearing impairment (OR 9.8, 95% CI 1.4-70.8, p = 0.024). Participants with 3 out of 6 IC decline had a probability of greater than 80% to belong to the low/moderate participation class.

Discussion

Physical function, cognition, hearing and nutrition were significantly associated with low and/or moderate participation class. Future studies are needed to evaluate improvement in participation of those with falls or at risk for falls through restoration of IC.

Combined use of two frailty tools in predicting mortality in older adults

We aimed to verify the combined use of two frailty tools in predicting mortality in older adults. We used the data of 10,276 Japanese older adults (aged ≥ 65 years) who provided valid responses to two frailty assessment tools in a mail survey in Japan's Kyoto‒Kameoka Prospective cohort study. Frailty status was categorized into four groups depending on the validated frailty screening index and Kihon Checklist, respectively: Non-frailty (n = 5960), Physical frailty (n = 223), Comprehensive frailty (n = 2211), and Combination (n = 1882) groups. Mortality data were collected between July 30, 2011, and November 30, 2016. We assessed the relationship between frailty status and all-cause mortality risk using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. During a median follow-up of 5.3 years, we recorded 1257 deaths. After adjusting for confounders, the Combination group had the highest mortality risk compared with the other groups [Non-frailty: reference; Physical frailty: hazards ratio [HR], 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58 to 1.70); Comprehensive frailty: 1.91 (1.63 to 2.23); Combination: 2.85 (2.44 to 3.22)]. People who are positive for frailty in both instruments have a higher risk of death than those who are positive to one model.