1
|
Narita K. Targeted approaches to diagnose and treat resistant hypertension in Asia. Hypertens Res 2024; 47:2955-2958. [PMID: 39147892 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01833-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 08/17/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Narita
- Columbia Hypertension Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Shimotsuke, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Foy A. Approach to the office patient with apparent resistant or refractory hypertension: Is there a role for renal denervation? Trends Cardiovasc Med 2024:S1050-1738(24)00090-2. [PMID: 39317309 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2024.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
|
3
|
Zeng W, Tomlinson B. Options for patients with out-of-control blood pressure: after all avenues have been exhausted. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2024:1-12. [PMID: 39258872 DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2024.2401875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Uncontrolled hypertension is the leading risk factor for global mortality. Most hypertensive patients can be controlled with standard medication combinations, but some may not respond adequately to ≥3 or even to ≥5 antihypertensive agents. AREAS COVERED In this review, we summarize the recent literature on difficult-to-treat hypertension identified by a Medline search, and we discuss the options for fourth line and subsequent therapy. EXPERT OPINION It is essential to confirm resistant hypertension with out-of-office blood pressure measurements and to consider lifestyle factors, adherence to medication and secondary causes of hypertension. When true resistant hypertension is confirmed and blood pressure is not controlled with an optimal triple combination, preferably as a fixed dose combination tablet, spironolactone is usually recommended as the fourth medication. Comorbid conditions should be treated as appropriate with sodium-glucose-cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, sacubitril-valsartan or finerenone. Renal denervation appears to be a useful addition to overcome some of the problems of medication adherence. The endothelin antagonist aprocitentan may be a final option in some countries. Of the drugs in development, the RNA based therapeutics that inhibit angiotensinogen synthesis appear to be some of the most promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiwei Zeng
- Department of Pharmacy, Shenzhen Longgang Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Brian Tomlinson
- Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science & Technology, Macau, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shariati F, Tandan N, Lavie CJ. Resistant hypertension. Curr Opin Cardiol 2024; 39:266-272. [PMID: 38456513 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000001134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure despite the concurrent use of three antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, at optimal doses. This clinical phenomenon poses a significant burden on healthcare systems worldwide due to its association with increased cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. RECENT FINDINGS Ongoing studies on device-based treatment of RH, with aim to reduce sympathetic nervous system outflow, have shown promising evidence in management of RH which may in turn decrease the incidence of composite cardiovascular outcome faced by the affected population. SUMMARY This paper aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RH, and review some of the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in management of RH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farnoosh Shariati
- Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute, Ochsner Clinical School - The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Azzam O, Nejad SH, Carnagarin R, Nolde JM, Galindo-Kiuchi M, Schlaich MP. Taming resistant hypertension: The promise of novel pharmacologic approaches and renal denervation. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:319-339. [PMID: 37715452 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is associated with an exceedingly high cardiovascular risk and there remains an unmet therapeutic need driven by pathophysiologic pathways unaddressed by guideline-recommended therapy. While spironolactone is widely considered as the preferable fourth-line drug, its broad application is limited by its side effect profile, especially off-target steroid receptor-mediated effects and hyperkalaemia in at-risk subpopulations. Recent landmark trials have reported promising safety and efficacy results for a number of novel compounds targeting relevant pathophysiologic pathways that remain unopposed by contemporary drugs. These include the dual endothelin receptor antagonist, aprocitentan, the aldosterone synthase inhibitor, baxdrostat and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone. Furthermore, the evidence base for consideration of catheter-based renal denervation as a safe and effective adjunct therapeutic approach across the clinical spectrum of hypertension has been further substantiated. This review will summarise the recently published evidence on novel antihypertensive drugs and renal denervation in the context of resistant hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Azzam
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Sayeh Heidari Nejad
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Revathy Carnagarin
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Janis M Nolde
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marcio Galindo-Kiuchi
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Markus P Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School-Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Royal Perth Hospital Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Filippone EJ, Naccarelli GV, Foy AJ. Controversies in Hypertension V: Resistant and Refractory Hypertension. Am J Med 2024; 137:12-22. [PMID: 37832756 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023]
Abstract
Apparent resistant hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure despite ≥ 3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic or use of ≥ 4 medications regardless of blood pressure, occurs in ≤ 15% of treated hypertensives. Apparent refractory hypertension, defined as uncontrolled office pressure despite use of 5 or more medications including a diuretic, occurs in ≤ 10% of resistant cases. Both are associated with increased comorbidity and enhanced cardiovascular risk. To rule out pseudo-resistant or pseudo-refractory hypertension, employ guideline-based methodology for obtaining pressure, maximize the regimen, rule out white-coat effect, and assess adherence. True resistant hypertension is characterized by volume overload and aldosterone excess, refractory by enhanced sympathetic tone. Spironolactone is the preferred agent for resistance, with lower doses. Spironolactone, potassium binders, or both, are preferred if the estimated glomerular filtration rate is below 45. If significant albuminuria, finerenone is indicated. The optimal treatment of refractory hypertension is unclear, but sympathetic inhibition (α-β blockade, centrally acting sympathoinhibitors, or both) seems reasonable. Renal denervation has shown minimal benefit for resistance, but its role in refractory hypertension remains to be defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward J Filippone
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pa.
| | - Gerald V Naccarelli
- Department of Medicine, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State M.S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa
| | - Andrew J Foy
- Department of Medicine, Penn State University Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State M.S. Hershey Medical Center and College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
PURPOSE The current review is to describe the definition and prevalence of resistant arterial hypertension (RAH), the difference between refractory hypertension, patient characteristics and major risk factors for RAH, how RAH is diagnosed, prognosis and outcomes for patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS According to the WHO, approximately 1.28 billion adults aged 30-79 worldwide have arterial hypertension, and over 80% of them do not have blood pressure (BP) under control. RAH is defined as above-goal elevated BP despite the concurrent use of 3 or more classes of antihypertensive drugs, commonly including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, an inhibitor of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker), and a thiazide diuretic administered at maximum or maximally tolerated doses and at appropriate dosing frequency. RAH occurs in nearly 1 of 6 hypertensive patients. It often remains unrecognised mainly because patients are not prescribed ≥3 drugs at maximal doses despite uncontrolled BP. CONCLUSION RAH distinctly increases the risk of developing coronary artery disease, heart failure, stroke and chronic kidney disease and confers higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events as well as increased all-cause mortality. Timely diagnosis and treatment of RAH may mitigate the associated risks and improve short and long-term prognosis.
Collapse
|
8
|
Park S, Shin J, Ihm SH, Kim KI, Kim HL, Kim HC, Lee EM, Lee JH, Ahn SY, Cho EJ, Kim JH, Kang HT, Lee HY, Lee S, Kim W, Park JM. Resistant hypertension: consensus document from the Korean society of hypertension. Clin Hypertens 2023; 29:30. [PMID: 37908019 PMCID: PMC10619268 DOI: 10.1186/s40885-023-00255-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although reports vary, the prevalence of true resistant hypertension and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (aTRH) has been reported to be 10.3% and 14.7%, respectively. As there is a rapid increase in the prevalence of obesity, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mellitus, factors that are associated with resistant hypertension, the prevalence of resistant hypertension is expected to rise as well. Frequently, patients with aTRH have pseudoresistant hypertension [aTRH due to white-coat uncontrolled hypertension (WUCH), drug underdosing, poor adherence, and inaccurate office blood pressure (BP) measurements]. As the prevalence of WUCH is high among patients with aTRH, the use of out-of-office BP measurements, both ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), is essential to exclude WUCH. Non-adherence is especially problematic, and methods to assess adherence remain limited and often not clinically feasible. Therefore, the use of HBPM and higher utilization of single-pill fixed-dose combination treatments should be emphasized to improve drug adherence. In addition, primary aldosteronism and symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea are quite common in patients with hypertension and more so in patients with resistant hypertension. Screening for these diseases is essential, as the treatment of these secondary causes may help control BP in patients who are otherwise difficult to treat. Finally, a proper drug regimen combined with lifestyle modifications is essential to control BP in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sungha Park
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Integrative Research Center for Cerebrovascular and Cardiovascular Diseases, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinho Shin
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sang Hyun Ihm
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
- Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital327 Sosa-Ro, Wonmi-guGyunggi-do, Bucheon-si, 14647, Republic of Korea.
| | - Kwang-Il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Hack-Lyoung Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyeon Chang Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Mi Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wonkwang University Sanbon Hospital, Wonkwang University College of Medicine, Gunpo, Republic of Korea
| | - Jang Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Shin Young Ahn
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eun Joo Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Han Kim
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hee-Taik Kang
- Department of Family Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae-Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunki Lee
- Hallym University, Dongtan Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Woohyeun Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Moo Park
- Department of Neurology, Uijeongbu Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University, Uijeongbu, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holliday M, Burnett A, Leavitt M, Knapke J, Hargraves D, Pallerla H. Evaluation of an Academic Detailing Program to Improve Blood Pressure Measurement and Hypertension Treatment in Urban Community Health Centers. THE JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS 2023; 43:e13-e17. [PMID: 36729000 DOI: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hypertension is estimated at a prevalence of 30 to 50% in the United States. Only 54% of patients with hypertension have their condition adequately controlled. This study aimed to use academic detailing (AD) to improve practice team knowledge and confidence in blood pressure (BP) management, specifically in low-income, underresourced patient populations. METHODS AD was developed for five practices that care for high percentages of Medicaid-eligible patients. A needs assessment was administered to each site's practice champion to determine high-yield AD sessions for their team. Presession and postsession evaluations were completed by practice team members. RESULTS Fifty providers and eight staff member participants completed evaluations over nine sessions for two AD topics at four practice sites. Statistical significance was found for several items within sessions including accurately choosing cuff sizes and identifying barriers to home BP monitoring. DISCUSSION AD is a potentially financially efficient model to improve knowledge and confidence in hypertension care at the practice level. Tailoring session content to specific needs of a practice site, along with an identified practice champion, facilitated implementation of the program. This replicable model is one way to deliver evidence-based information to those who serve Medicaid-eligible patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Holliday
- Dr. Holliday: Associate Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Dr. Burnett: Physician, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Dr. Leavitt: Physician, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Dr. Knapke: Assistant Professor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Mr. Hargraves: Senior Research Assistant, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH. Ms. Pallerla: Principal Research Assistant, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen JX, Zhou YF, Geng T, Chen S, Chen S, Wang G, Zhang YB, Wang Y, Tu ZZ, Liu G, Wu S, Pan A. Low Concordance Between Blood Pressures Measured in Periodic Health Examinations and in a Workplace-Based Hypertension Management Program. PHENOMICS (CHAM, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 2:419-429. [PMID: 36939804 PMCID: PMC9712859 DOI: 10.1007/s43657-022-00067-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
Poor adherence to standard protocols of blood pressure (BP) measurement in routine clinical practice leads to higher readings than "research-quality" measurements. Whether this phenomenon exists in periodic health examinations was unknown. We aimed to explore the concordance between BP measurements in periodic health examinations and those measured following a standard measurement protocol. We used data from the Kailuan Study, an ongoing longitudinal cohort study in China, of which participants received biennial health examinations in health management centers. In addition, BPs were measured following standard protocols in a workplace-based hypertension management program nested in the Kailuan Study. We compared BP readings of the same person between the two settings using generalized linear mixed-effects models. A total of 3988 men (the mean age was 44.9 years) had at least two BP measurements both in health examinations and management program with a time interval between the two settings that less than 90 days. The mean systolic blood pressures (SBP) and diastolic blood pressures (DBP) in health examinations were 4.2 (95% CI 3.9-4.5) mm Hg and 3.3 (95% CI 3.1-3.5) mm Hg higher than those in the management program, respectively. Bland-Altman analyses showed the wide agreement intervals ranging from - 27.7- to 36.5-mm Hg for SBP and - 18.3- to 24.7-mm Hg for DBP. In conclusion, BP measurements in periodic health examinations were generally higher than BPs measured following a standard protocol. Our findings highlight the importance of standard BP measurement to avoid overestimation of hypertension prevalence and treatment initiation. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-022-00067-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Xiang Chen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Yan-Feng Zhou
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Tingting Geng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Simiao Chen
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, 44883 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Shuohua Chen
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, 57 Xinhua East Road, Tangshan, 063000 Hebei China
| | - Guodong Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, 57 Xinhua East Road, Tangshan, 063000 Hebei China
| | - Yan-Bo Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Yi Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Zhou-Zheng Tu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Nutrition and Safety, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430040 Hubei China
| | - Shouling Wu
- Department of Cardiology, Kailuan General Hospital, North China University of Science and Technology, 57 Xinhua East Road, Tangshan, 063000 Hebei China
| | - An Pan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Danaietash P, Verweij P, Wang JG, Dresser G, Kantola I, Lawrence MK, Narkiewicz K, Schlaich M, Bellet M. Identifying and treating resistant hypertension in PRECISION: A randomized long-term clinical trial with aprocitentan. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2022; 24:804-813. [PMID: 35686330 PMCID: PMC9278594 DOI: 10.1111/jch.14517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The design and baseline data of the PRECISION study, which evaluates the effect of the dual endothelin receptor antagonist aprocitentan on blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension (RHT) are presented. The study is a blinded, randomized, parallel-group Phase 3 study and its three-part design assesses the short-term and sustained long-term effects of aprocitentan on BP. Results are expected in 2022. Patients with uncontrolled BP (measured as unattended automated office BP) despite the use of three or more antihypertensive medications for at least 1 year were screened. They were switched to a single-tablet triple fixed combination antihypertensive therapy for at least 4 weeks before entering a single-blind placebo run-in period. The 4-week placebo run-in period further excluded placebo responders. The randomization period consisted of three sequential parts: (1) a 4-week double-blind part with aprocitentan 12.5 mg, 25 mg, or placebo (1:1:1 ratio); (2) a 32-week single-blind part with aprocitentan 25 mg; and (3) a 12-week randomized withdrawal part with aprocitentan 25 mg or placebo (1:1 ratio). The purpose was to demonstrate the BP lowering effect of aprocitentan in RHT (Part 1) and the persistence of this effect (Parts 2 and 3). Out of 1965 screened patients, 730 were randomized resulting in an overall inclusion failure rate of 62.8%. The most common reason for exclusion (44.4% of all screened patients) was failure to meet the BP inclusion criteria. These results underline the high proportion of pseudoresistant hypertension among patients referred for RHT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Danaietash
- Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Verweij
- Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
| | - Ji-Guang Wang
- Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - George Dresser
- London Health Sciences Centre - Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilkka Kantola
- Division of Medicine, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | | | | | - Markus Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital Unit - University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Marc Bellet
- Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Allschwil, Basel-Landschaft, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
2022 Malaysian Working Group Consensus Statement on Renal Denervation for management of arterial hypertension. Hypertens Res 2022; 45:1111-1122. [PMID: 35650248 PMCID: PMC9192347 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00937-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Hypertension is highly prevalent and a major contributor to cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. In spite of the availability of efficacious, safe and affordable anti-hypertensive drugs, hypertension remains poorly controlled in the majority of hypertensive patients. Various reasons including non-adherence to the anti-hypertensive drugs, account for the poor control. Resistant hypertension is also one of the reasons for poor control of blood pressure (BP). The sympathetic nervous system (SNS) has long been recognized as one of the determinants in the pathophysiology of a raised BP. Overactivity of the SNS is a contributor to sustained arterial hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) is increasingly recognized as a safe and effective adjunctive therapy to control BP with or without pharmacotherapy. Hence for patients who remain uncontrolled despite all efforts, renal denervation (RDN) is a novel treatment that can potentially improve BP control, hence reducing the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). More recent randomized, sham control trials of RDN have shown that RDN produces a sustained lowering of BP. To date, this lowering of BP through RDN is maintained for at least 3 years. Furthermore, this procedure has been found to be safe. Hence this consensus summarises the science behind RDN and the available clinical data to support the use of this therapy. It is hoped that this consensus will offer guidance on the importance of identifying patients who will benefit most from this therapy. A multidisciplinary team approach in the management of the patient undergoing RDN is recommended. ![]()
Collapse
|
13
|
Revisiting the diagnosis of 'resistant hypertension': what should we do nowadays'. J Hum Hypertens 2021; 36:337-340. [PMID: 34743172 PMCID: PMC9021017 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-021-00631-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
14
|
Laffin LJ, Bakris GL. Approach to Resistant Hypertension from Cardiology and Nephrology Standpoints: Tailoring Therapy. Cardiol Clin 2021; 39:377-387. [PMID: 34247751 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is commonly encountered in primary care, cardiology, and nephrology clinics. In patients presenting for the evaluation of resistant hypertension, taking a thoughtful approach to excluding pseudoresistant hypertension or a secondary cause of hypertension is important. When a patient is deemed to have true resistant hypertension, following an evidence-based treatment approach while considering patient-specific comorbidities results not only in better blood pressure control but also better patient long-term adherence to lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions. This article details an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension with special consideration for patients with preexisting renal and/or cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke J Laffin
- Section of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Mail code JB1, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - George L Bakris
- American Heart Association Comprehensive Hypertension Center, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 1027, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bergland OU, Halvorsen LV, Søraas CL, Hjørnholm U, Kjær VN, Rognstad S, Brobak KM, Aune A, Olsen E, Fauchald YM, Heimark S, Thorstensen CW, Liestøl K, Solbu MD, Gerdts E, Mo R, Rostrup M, Kjeldsen SE, Høieggen A, Opdal MS, Larstorp ACK, Fadl Elmula FEM. Detection of Nonadherence to Antihypertensive Treatment by Measurements of Serum Drug Concentrations. Hypertension 2021; 78:617-628. [PMID: 34275336 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Undrum Bergland
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Lene V Halvorsen
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Nephrology (L.V.H., S.H., A.H.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Camilla L Søraas
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Section for Environmental and Occupational Medicine (C.L.S.)
| | - Ulla Hjørnholm
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.)
| | - Vibeke N Kjær
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.)
| | - Stine Rognstad
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Pharmacology (S.R., C.W.T., M.S.O.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Karl Marius Brobak
- Metabolic and Renal Research Group (K.M.B., M.D.S.), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø.,UiT The Arctic University of Norway, and Section of Nephrology (K.M.B., M.D.S.), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø
| | - Arleen Aune
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen (A.A., E.G.).,Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen (A.A., E.G.)
| | - Eirik Olsen
- Department of Cardiology, Trondheim University Hospital, University of Trondheim (E.O., R.M.)
| | - Ylva M Fauchald
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.)
| | - Sondre Heimark
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Nephrology (L.V.H., S.H., A.H.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | | | - Knut Liestøl
- Department of Informatics (K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Marit D Solbu
- Metabolic and Renal Research Group (K.M.B., M.D.S.), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø.,UiT The Arctic University of Norway, and Section of Nephrology (K.M.B., M.D.S.), University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø
| | - Eva Gerdts
- Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen (A.A., E.G.).,Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen (A.A., E.G.)
| | - Rune Mo
- Department of Cardiology, Trondheim University Hospital, University of Trondheim (E.O., R.M.)
| | - Morten Rostrup
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Acute Medicine (M.R., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Behavioral Sciences, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences (M.R.), University of Oslo
| | - Sverre E Kjeldsen
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Cardiology (S.E.K.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Aud Høieggen
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Nephrology (L.V.H., S.H., A.H.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Mimi S Opdal
- Department of Pharmacology (S.R., C.W.T., M.S.O.)
| | - Anne Cecilie K Larstorp
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Medical Biochemistry (A.C.K.L.).,Oslo University Hospital Ullevål; Institute of Clinical Medicine (O.U.B., L.V.H., S.R., S.H., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L.), University of Oslo
| | - Fadl Elmula M Fadl Elmula
- From the Section for Cardiovascular and Renal Research (O.U.B., L.V.H., C.L.S., U.H., V.N.K., S.R., Y.M.F., S.H., M.R., S.E.K., A.H., A.C.K.L., F.E.M.F.E.).,Department of Acute Medicine (M.R., F.E.M.F.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Madhur MS, Elijovich F, Alexander MR, Pitzer A, Ishimwe J, Van Beusecum JP, Patrick DM, Smart CD, Kleyman TR, Kingery J, Peck RN, Laffer CL, Kirabo A. Hypertension: Do Inflammation and Immunity Hold the Key to Solving this Epidemic? Circ Res 2021; 128:908-933. [PMID: 33793336 PMCID: PMC8023750 DOI: 10.1161/circresaha.121.318052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Elevated cardiovascular risk including stroke, heart failure, and heart attack is present even after normalization of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Underlying immune cell activation is a likely culprit. Although immune cells are important for protection against invading pathogens, their chronic overactivation may lead to tissue damage and high blood pressure. Triggers that may initiate immune activation include viral infections, autoimmunity, and lifestyle factors such as excess dietary salt. These conditions activate the immune system either directly or through their impact on the gut microbiome, which ultimately produces chronic inflammation and hypertension. T cells are central to the immune responses contributing to hypertension. They are activated in part by binding specific antigens that are presented in major histocompatibility complex molecules on professional antigen-presenting cells, and they generate repertoires of rearranged T-cell receptors. Activated T cells infiltrate tissues and produce cytokines including interleukin 17A, which promote renal and vascular dysfunction and end-organ damage leading to hypertension. In this comprehensive review, we highlight environmental, genetic, and microbial associated mechanisms contributing to both innate and adaptive immune cell activation leading to hypertension. Targeting the underlying chronic immune cell activation in hypertension has the potential to mitigate the excess cardiovascular risk associated with this common and deadly disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meena S. Madhur
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University
| | - Fernando Elijovich
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Matthew R. Alexander
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Ashley Pitzer
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeanne Ishimwe
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Justin P. Van Beusecum
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - David M. Patrick
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center
| | - Charles D. Smart
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University
| | - Thomas R. Kleyman
- Departments of Medicine, Cell Biology, Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Justin Kingery
- Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Robert N. Peck
- Center for Global Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Bugando School of Medicine, Mwanza, Tanzania
- Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit (MITU), Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Cheryl L. Laffer
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Annet Kirabo
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Vanderbilt University
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zanatta JMDM, Cosenso-Martin LN, da Silva Lopes V, Roma Uyemura JR, Polegati Santos AM, Paz Landim MI, Yugar-Toledo JC, Vilela-Martin JF. Evidence of Nonadherence in Cases of Pseudoresistant Hypertension. Integr Blood Press Control 2021; 14:9-17. [PMID: 33603455 PMCID: PMC7887157 DOI: 10.2147/ibpc.s264057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RH) is characterized by the use of three or more antihypertensive drugs without reaching the goal of controlling blood pressure (BP). For a definitive diagnosis of RH, it is necessary to exclude causes of pseudoresistance, including the white-coat effect, errors in BP measurement, secondary hypertension, therapeutic inertia, and poor adherence to lifestyle changes and pharmacological treatment. Herein, we report the history of a patient with long-standing uncontrolled BP, even when using seven antihypertensive drugs. Causes of secondary hypertension that justified the high BP levels were investigated, in addition to the other causes of pseudo-RH. In view of the difficult-to-control BP situation, it was decided to hospitalize the patient for better investigation. After 5 days, he had BP control with practically the same medications previously used. Finally, all factors related to the presence of pseudo-RH are discussed, especially poor adherence to treatment. Poor adherence to antihypertensive treatment is common in daily medical practice, and its investigation is of fundamental importance for better management of BP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Marcos de Menezes Zanatta
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Luciana Neves Cosenso-Martin
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Valquíria da Silva Lopes
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jéssica Rodrigues Roma Uyemura
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Aleandra Marton Polegati Santos
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Manoel Ildefonso Paz Landim
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Juan Carlos Yugar-Toledo
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Fernando Vilela-Martin
- Internal Medicine Department, State Medical School at Sao Jose Do Rio Preto (FAMERP), Sao Jose Do Rio Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fay KS, Cohen DL. Resistant Hypertension in People With CKD: A Review. Am J Kidney Dis 2021; 77:110-121. [DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
|
19
|
Laffin LJ, Khan A, Lang K, Van Iterson EH. Prevalence and clinical outcomes of patients with apparent treatment‐resistant hypertension enrolled in Phase 2 cardiac rehabilitation. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020; 22:2377-2381. [DOI: 10.1111/jch.14057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luke J. Laffin
- Section of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland OH USA
| | - Asad Khan
- Department of Internal Medicine Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland OH USA
| | - Katherine Lang
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland OH USA
| | - Erik H. Van Iterson
- Section of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Cleveland Clinic Foundation Cleveland OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Padmanabhan R, Singh RG, Unni G, Desai B, Hiremath SK, Jain V, Bhawal S, Gulati S, Shete M, Nair R, Prakash S, Kher V, Bhattacharya B. Multidisciplinary Consensus Document on the Management of Uncontrolled Hypertension in India. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 2020; 27:215-223. [PMID: 32382998 DOI: 10.1007/s40292-020-00385-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is predicted to be the largest cause of death and disability in India by 2020. Hypertension (HT), one of the main contributing factors, presents a significant public health burden. Inability to achieve adequate blood pressure (BP) control results in uncontrolled hypertension (UHT). The prevalence of UHT is high in India, with only about 9-20% of patients achieving target BP goals. Presently, there are no guidelines specific to UHT, which if left uncontrolled can lead to resistant HT, chronic kidney disease and other complications of HT. A multidisciplinary panel, comprising of specialists in cardiology, nephrology and internal medicine, was convened to address the diagnosis and management of UHT in the Indian population. The panel identified key points concerning UHT and discussed management recommendations in the Indian clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Padmanabhan
- Department of Nephrology, SRM Medical College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
| | - Rana Gopal Singh
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India
| | - Govindan Unni
- Department of Cardiology, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Bhupen Desai
- Department of Cardiology, Karuna Hospital, Borivali West, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | | | - Vidyut Jain
- Department of Cardiology, Choithram Hospital and Research Center, Indore, India
| | - Saikat Bhawal
- Consultant Physician and Diabetologist, Ashok Nursing Home Private Limited, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| | - Sanjeev Gulati
- Department of Nephrology, Fortis Hospitals, New Delhi, India
| | - Mukesh Shete
- Department of Nephrology, Apex Kidney Care, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Ramesh Nair
- Department of Medicine, Lakshmi Hospital, Diwans Road, Ernakulam, Kerala, India
| | - Sunil Prakash
- Department of Nephrology, BLK Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Vijay Kher
- Chairman, Department of Nephrology, Medanta Kidney and Urology Institute, Haryana, India
| | - Bijan Bhattacharya
- Department of Nephrology, Ruby General Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Unger T, Borghi C, Charchar F, Khan NA, Poulter NR, Prabhakaran D, Ramirez A, Schlaich M, Stergiou GS, Tomaszewski M, Wainford RD, Williams B, Schutte AE. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2020; 75:1334-1357. [PMID: 32370572 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1717] [Impact Index Per Article: 429.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Unger
- From the CARIM - School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, the Netherlands (T.U.)
| | - Claudio Borghi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy (C.B.)
| | - Fadi Charchar
- Federation University Australia, School of Health and Life Sciences, Ballarat, Australia (F.C.).,University of Melbourne, Department of Physiology, Melbourne, Australia (F.C.).,University of Leicester, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, United Kingdom (F.C.)
| | - Nadia A Khan
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (N.A.K.).,Center for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Vancouver, Canada (N.A.K.)
| | - Neil R Poulter
- Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, Imperial College London, United Kingdom (N.R.P.)
| | - Dorairaj Prabhakaran
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India (D.P.).,Centre for Chronic Disease Control, New Delhi, India (D.P.).,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom (D.P.)
| | - Agustin Ramirez
- Hypertension and Metabolic Unit, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina (A.R.)
| | - Markus Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, School of Medicine, Royal Perth Hospital Unit, University of Western Australia, Perth (M.S.).,Neurovascular Hypertension & Kidney Disease Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (M.N.)
| | - George S Stergiou
- Hypertension Center STRIDE-7, School of Medicine, Third Department of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece (G.S.S.)
| | - Maciej Tomaszewski
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Biology and Health, University of Manchester, United Kingdom (M.T.).,Division of Medicine and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester, United Kingdom (M.T.)
| | - Richard D Wainford
- Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Boston University School of Medicine, MA (R.D.W.).,The Whitaker Cardiovascular Institute, Boston University, MA (R.D.W.).,Department of Health Sciences, Boston University Sargent College, MA (R.D.W.)
| | - Bryan Williams
- University College London, NIHR University College London, Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom (B.W.)
| | - Aletta E Schutte
- Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (A.E.S.).,The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, Australia (A.E.S.).,Hypertension in Africa Research Team (A.E.S.), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.,South African MRC Unit for Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease (A.E.S.), North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Doumas M, Imprialos KP, Kallistratos MS, Manolis AJ. Recent advances in understanding and managing resistant/refractory hypertension. F1000Res 2020; 9. [PMID: 32201574 PMCID: PMC7065661 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.21669.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of resistant hypertension presents several challenges in everyday clinical practice. During the past few years, several studies have been performed to identify efficient and safe pharmacological and non-pharmacological options for the management of such patients. The Spironolactone versus placebo, bisoprolol, and doxazosin to determine the optimal treatment for drug-resistant hypertension (PATHWAY-2) trial demonstrated significant benefits with the use of spinorolactone as a fourth-line drug for the treatment of resistant hypertension over doxazosin and bisoprolol. In addition, recent data support that spironolactone may demonstrate superiority over central acting drugs in such patients, as well. Based on the European guidelines, spironolactone is recommended as the fourth-line drug option, followed by amiloride, other diuretics, doxazosin, bisoprolol or clonidine. Among several device-based approaches, renal sympathetic denervation had fallen into hibernation after the disappointing results of the Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension (SYMPLICITY HTN) 3 trial. However, the technique re-emerged at the epicenter of the clinical and research interest after the favorable results of three sham-controlled studies, which facilitated novel catheters and techniques to perform the denervation. Significant results of iliac anastomosis on blood pressure levels have also been demonstrated. Nevertheless, the technique-related adverse events resulted in withdrawal of this interventional approach. Last, the sympatholytic properties of the carotid baroreceptor activation therapy were associated with significant blood pressure reductions in patients with resistant hypertension, which need to be verified in larger controlled trials. Currently device-based approaches are recommended only in the setting of clinical trials until more safety and efficacy data become available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Doumas
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, 54250, Greece.,VAMC and George Washington University, Washington, USA
| | - Konstantinos P Imprialos
- 2nd Propedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Makedonia, 54250, Greece
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a diuretic, usually thiazide-like, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, and a blocker of the renin- angiotensin system, either an ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor or an ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker), at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. Antihypertensive medication nonadherence and the white coat effect, defined as elevated blood pressure when measured in clinic but controlled when measured outside of clinic, must be excluded to make the diagnosis. RHTN is a high-risk phenotype, leading to increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular disease outcomes. Healthy lifestyle habits are associated with reduced cardiovascular risk in patients with RHTN. Aldosterone excess is common in patients with RHTN, and addition of spironolactone or amiloride to the standard 3-drug antihypertensive regimen is effective at getting the blood pressure to goal in most of these patients. Refractory hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure despite use of ≥5 antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic and an MR (mineralocorticoid receptor) antagonist, at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. Fluid retention, mediated largely by aldosterone excess, is the predominant mechanism underlying RHTN, while patients with refractory hypertension typically exhibit increased sympathetic nervous system activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Czarina Acelajado
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Zachary H Hughes
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| | - David A Calhoun
- From the Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patil SJ, Wareg NK, Hodges KL, Smith JB, Kaiser MS, LeFevre ML. Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in Cases of Clinical Uncertainty to Differentiate Appropriate Inaction From Therapeutic Inertia. Ann Fam Med 2020; 18:50-58. [PMID: 31937533 PMCID: PMC7227476 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional clinic blood pressure (BP) measurements are routinely used for hypertension management and physician performance measures. We aimed to check home BP measurements after elevated conventional clinic BP measurements for which physicians did not intensify treatment, to differentiate therapeutic inertia from appropriate inaction. METHODS We conducted a pre and post study of home BP monitoring for patients with uncontrolled hypertension as determined by conventional clinic BP measurements for which physicians did not intensify hypertension management. Physicians were notified of average home BP 2-4 weeks after the initial clinic visit. Outcome measures were the proportion of patients with controlled hypertension using average home BP measurements, changes in hypertension management by physicians, changes in physicians' hypertension metrics, and factors associated with home-clinic BP differences. RESULTS Of 90 recruited patients who had elevated conventional clinic BP recordings, 65.6% had average home BP measurements that were <140/90 mm Hg. Physicians changed treatment plans for 61% of patients with average home BP readings of ≥140/90 mm Hg, whereas decisions to not change treatment for the remaining patients were based on contextual factors. Substituting average home BP for conventional clinic BP for 4% of patients from 2 physicians' hypertension registries improved the physicians' hypertension control rates by 3% to 5%. Greater body mass index and increased number of BP medications were associated with home BP measurement ≥140/90 mm Hg. Clinic BP levels did not estimate normal home BP levels. CONCLUSIONS Documented home BP in cases of clinical uncertainty helped differentiate therapeutic inertia from appropriate inaction and improved physicians' hypertension metrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonal J Patil
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Nuha K Wareg
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Kelvin L Hodges
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Jamie B Smith
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Mark S Kaiser
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Michael L LeFevre
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lamirault G, Artifoni M, Daniel M, Barber-Chamoux N, Nantes University Hospital Working Group On Hypertension. Resistant Hypertension: Novel Insights. Curr Hypertens Rev 2019; 16:61-72. [PMID: 31622203 DOI: 10.2174/1573402115666191011111402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Hypertension is the most common chronic disease and the leading risk factor for disability and premature deaths in the world, accounting for more than 9 million deaths annually. Resistant hypertension is a particularly severe form of hypertension. It was described 50 years ago and since then has been a very active field of research. This review aims at summarizing the most recent findings on resistant hypertension. The recent concepts of apparent- and true-resistant hypertension have stimulated a more precise definition of resistant hypertension taking into account not only the accuracy of blood pressure measurement and pharmacological class of prescribed drugs but also patient adherence to drugs and life-style recommendations. Recent epidemiological studies have reported a 10% prevalence of resistant hypertension among hypertensive subjects and demonstrated the high cardiovascular risk of these patients. In addition, these studies identified subgroups of patients with even higher morbidity and mortality risk, probably requiring a more aggressive medical management. In the meantime, guidelines provided more standardized clinical work-up to identify potentially reversible causes for resistant hypertension such as secondary hypertension. The debate is however still ongoing on which would be the optimal method(s) to screen for non-adherence to hypertension therapy, recognized as the major cause for (pseudo)-resistance to treatment. Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the strong benefit of anti-aldosterone drugs (mostly spironolocatone) as fourth-line therapies in resistant hypertension whereas clinical trials with device-based therapies displayed contrasting results. New trials with improved devices and more carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Lamirault
- l'institut du Thorax, INSERM, CNRS, UNIV Nantes, Nantes, France.,l'institut du Thorax, CHU Nantes, Service de Cardiologie, Nantes, France
| | | | - Mélanie Daniel
- Clinical Pharmacology Centre (INSERM CIC1505), CHU Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Podzolkov VI, Bragina AE, Osadchiy KK. Resistant Hypertension: Questions and Contemporary Answers. RATIONAL PHARMACOTHERAPY IN CARDIOLOGY 2019. [DOI: 10.20996/1819-6446-2019-15-4-568-577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The review presents the important problem of resistant hypertension. Its real prevalence is unknown. According to population studies and metaanalyzes of clinical studies, the prevalence of this most severe form of hypertension reaches 12-15% in the general population and 15-18% in clinical cohorts. Over the past decades, an increase in its frequency among patients with hypertension has been noted. Based on the results of large-scale studies, risk factors are detected that allow to assess the risk for the resistance to antihypertensive drugs. Adherence to ongoing antihypertensive therapy is crucial to addressing the issue of hypertension resistance; there are acceptable ways to evaluate it in clinical practice. The review discusses the most common mistakes in the choice of therapy, which can cause resistance to antihypertensive treatment, namely irrational drug combinations, insufficient dosage of the drug, and the use of non-prolonged forms of drugs. The latest recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, including its resistant form, are analyzed. The review contains a rationale based on the results of randomized clinical trials, the choice antihypertensive strategy in this variant of arterial hypertension. The importance of fixed combination antihypertensive drugs, as well as thiazine-like diuretics and amlodipine is stressed. The results of studies demonstrate the rational for the use of antimineralcorticoid drugs, namely spironolactone, for this category of patients. The authors offer an updated algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of resistant hypertension, based on the sections of the latest clinical recommendations on this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V. I. Podzolkov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - A. E. Bragina
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| | - K. K. Osadchiy
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lorthioir A, Belmihoub I, Fouassier D, Azizi M, Amar L. [Spironolactone in resistant essential hypertension]. Presse Med 2019; 48:1431-1438. [PMID: 31473027 DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2019.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) despite three antihypertensive agents including a diuretic (thiazide diuretic if renal function is normal or loop diuretic in case of chronic kidney disease with eGFR<30mL/min), a renin-angiotensin system blocker (ARB or ACEI) and a calcium channel blocker, at optimal doses. Resistance must be confirmed by out-of-office measurements (ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or home blood pressure monitoring) and patients should be asked about treatment compliance and excessive salt or alcohol intake. If the diagnosis of resistant hypertension is confirmed, the patient should be referred to a hypertension specialist to screen for secondary causes of hypertension as they are frequent in this context. If essential resistant hypertension is confirmed, the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, spironolactone, should be added (25 to 50mg daily). In the event of a contraindication to spironolactone, or if adverse effects occur, a beta-blocker, an alpha-blocker, or a centrally acting antihypertensive drug should be prescribed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Lorthioir
- AP-HP, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hypertension unit, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France.
| | - Inès Belmihoub
- AP-HP, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hypertension unit, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes university, faculty of medicine, 75006 Paris, France
| | - David Fouassier
- Paris-Descartes university, faculty of medicine, 75006 Paris, France; AP-HP, hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Michel Azizi
- AP-HP, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hypertension unit, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes university, faculty of medicine, 75006 Paris, France; AP-HP, hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Centre d'Investigation Clinique, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Laurence Amar
- AP-HP, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, hypertension unit, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France; Paris-Descartes university, faculty of medicine, 75006 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Grassi G, Calhoun DA, Mancia G, Carey RM. Resistant Hypertension Management: Comparison of the 2017 American and 2018 European High Blood Pressure Guidelines. Curr Hypertens Rep 2019; 21:67. [PMID: 31321564 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-019-0974-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To compare European and American guidelines for the diagnosis, evaluation, and management of resistant hypertension. RECENT FINDINGS Resistant hypertension is defined as high blood pressure that remains above goal with the use of 3 or more antihypertensive agents, commonly a renin-angiotensin blocker (either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker), a long-acting calcium channel blocker, and thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic. Resistant hypertension is common, with a recent analysis indicating that it affects approximately 17-19% of adult Americans with hypertension. Pseudocauses of apparent resistant hypertension, including inaccurate blood pressure measurement, white coat effect, undertreatment, and poor medication adherence, must be excluded in order to confirm true resistant hypertension. Evaluation of resistant hypertension requires identifying and treating secondary causes of hypertension, including obstructive sleep apnea, primary aldosteronism, and renal artery stenosis. Treatment of resistant hypertension includes a combined use of lifestyle modification and prescription of effective multiple-drug combinations. Preferential use of a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic, either chlorthalidone or indapamide, and a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, most commonly spironolactone, is recommended if needed to achieve blood pressure control. Aside for small exceptions, European and American guidelines agree in terms of recommendations for diagnosing, evaluating, and treating resistant hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Grassi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Medica, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - David A Calhoun
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Giuseppe Mancia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Medica, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Robert M Carey
- Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, P.O. Box 801414, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-1414, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Carey RM, Calhoun DA, Bakris GL, Brook RD, Daugherty SL, Dennison-Himmelfarb CR, Egan BM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Judd E, Lackland DT, Laffer CL, Newton-Cheh C, Smith SM, Taler SJ, Textor SC, Turan TN, White WB. Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension 2019; 72:e53-e90. [PMID: 30354828 DOI: 10.1161/hyp.0000000000000084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 589] [Impact Index Per Article: 117.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as above-goal elevated blood pressure (BP) in a patient despite the concurrent use of 3 antihypertensive drug classes, commonly including a long-acting calcium channel blocker, a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker), and a diuretic. The antihypertensive drugs should be administered at maximum or maximally tolerated daily doses. RH also includes patients whose BP achieves target values on ≥4 antihypertensive medications. The diagnosis of RH requires assurance of antihypertensive medication adherence and exclusion of the "white-coat effect" (office BP above goal but out-of-office BP at or below target). The importance of RH is underscored by the associated risk of adverse outcomes compared with non-RH. This article is an updated American Heart Association scientific statement on the detection, evaluation, and management of RH. Once antihypertensive medication adherence is confirmed and out-of-office BP recordings exclude a white-coat effect, evaluation includes identification of contributing lifestyle issues, detection of drugs interfering with antihypertensive medication effectiveness, screening for secondary hypertension, and assessment of target organ damage. Management of RH includes maximization of lifestyle interventions, use of long-acting thiazide-like diuretics (chlorthalidone or indapamide), addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (spironolactone or eplerenone), and, if BP remains elevated, stepwise addition of antihypertensive drugs with complementary mechanisms of action to lower BP. If BP remains uncontrolled, referral to a hypertension specialist is advised.
Collapse
|
31
|
Schmidt K, Kelley W, Tringali S, Huang J. Achieving control of resistant hypertension: Not just the number of blood pressure medications. World J Hypertens 2019; 9:1-16. [DOI: 10.5494/wjh.v9.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RH) has a prevalence of around 12% and is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, progression to end-stage renal disease, and even mortality. In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association released updated guidelines that detail steps to ensure proper diagnosis of RH, including the exclusion of pseudoresistance. Lifestyle modifications, such as low salt diet and physical exercise, remain at the forefront of optimizing blood pressure control. Secondary causes of RH also need to be investigated, including screening for obstructive sleep apnea. Notably, the guidelines demonstrate a major change in medication management recommendations to include mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. In addition to advances in medication optimization, there are several device-based therapies that have been showing efficacy in the treatment of RH. Renal denervation therapy has struggled to show efficacy for blood pressure control, but with a re-designed catheter device, it is once again being tested in clinical trials. Carotid baroreceptor activation therapy (BAT) via an implantable pulse generator has been shown to be effective in lowering blood pressure both acutely and in long-term follow up data, but there is some concern about the safety profile. Both a second-generation pulse generator and an endovascular implant are being tested in new clinical trials with hopes for improved safety profiles while maintaining therapeutic efficacy. Both renal denervation and carotid BAT need continued study before widespread clinical implementation. Central arteriovenous anastomosis has emerged as another possible therapy and is being actively explored. The ongoing pursuit of blood pressure control is a vital part of minimizing adverse patient outcomes. The future landscape appears hopeful for helping patients achieve blood pressure goals not only through the optimization of antihypertensive medications but also through device-based therapies in select individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kara Schmidt
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA 93701, United States
| | - William Kelley
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA 93701, United States
| | - Steven Tringali
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA 93701, United States
| | - Jian Huang
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno Medical Education Program, Fresno, CA 93701, United States
- Medicine Service, VA Central California Health Care System, Fresno, CA 93703, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Roerecke M, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG. Comparing Automated Office Blood Pressure Readings With Other Methods of Blood Pressure Measurement for Identifying Patients With Possible Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 2019; 179:351-362. [PMID: 30715088 PMCID: PMC6439707 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.6551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 132] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Automated office blood pressure (AOBP) measurement involves recording several blood pressure (BP) readings using a fully automated oscillometric sphygmomanometer with the patient resting alone in a quiet place. Although several studies have shown AOBP measurement to be more accurate than routine office BP measurement and not subject to a "white coat effect," the cumulative evidence has not yet been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the association between AOBP and office BP readings measured in routine clinical practice and in research studies, and ambulatory BP recorded during awake hours, as the latter is a standard for predicting future cardiovascular events. DATA SOURCES The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched from 2003 to April 25, 2018. STUDY SELECTION Studies on systolic and diastolic BP measurement by AOBP in comparison with awake ambulatory BP, routine office BP, and research BP measurements were included if they contained 30 patients or more. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Study characteristics were abstracted independently and random effects meta-analyses and meta-regressions were conducted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Pooled mean differences (95% CI) of systolic and diastolic BP between types of BP measurement. RESULTS Data were compiled from 31 articles comprising 9279 participants (4736 men and 4543 women). In samples with systolic AOBP of 130 mm Hg or more, routine office and research systolic BP readings were substantially higher than AOBP readings, with a pooled mean difference of 14.5 mm Hg (95% CI, 11.8-17.2 mm Hg; n = 9; I2 = 94.3%; P < .001) for routine office systolic BP readings and 7.0 mm Hg (95% CI, 4.9-9.1 mm Hg; n = 9; I2 = 85.7%; P < .001) for research systolic BP readings. Systolic awake ambulatory BP and AOBP readings were similar, with a pooled mean difference of 0.3 mm Hg (95% CI, -1.1 to 1.7 mm Hg; n = 19; I2 = 90%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Automated office blood pressure readings, only when recorded properly with the patient sitting alone in a quiet place, are more accurate than office BP readings in routine clinical practice and are similar to awake ambulatory BP readings, with mean AOBP being devoid of any white coat effect. There has been some reluctance among physicians to adopt this technique because of uncertainty about its advantages compared with more traditional methods of recording BP during an office visit. Based on the evidence, AOBP should now be the preferred method for recording BP in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Roerecke
- Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Janusz Kaczorowski
- University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Martin G Myers
- Schulich Heart Program, Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cohen JB, Padwal RS, Gutkin M, Green BB, Bloch MJ, Germino FW, Sica DA, Viera AJ, Bluml BM, White WB, Taler SJ, Yarows S, Shimbo D, Townsend RR. History and Justification of a National Blood Pressure Measurement Validated Device Listing. Hypertension 2019; 73:258-264. [PMID: 30580681 PMCID: PMC6326837 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.118.11990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jordana B. Cohen
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Raj S. Padwal
- Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Gutkin
- Hypertension Section, Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, NJ
| | - Beverly B. Green
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael J. Bloch
- Department of Medicine, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV
- Vascular Care, Renown Institute for Heart and Vascular Health, Reno, NV
| | | | - Domenic A. Sica
- Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Anthony J. Viera
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC
| | | | - William B. White
- Calhoun Cardiology Center, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT
| | - Sandra J. Taler
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Steven Yarows
- IHA Chelsea Family and Internal Medicine, Chelsea, MI
| | - Daichi Shimbo
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Raymond R. Townsend
- Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Khanra D, Duggal B. Pseudo-resistant, resistant, and refractory hypertension: The good, the bad, and the ugly. JOURNAL OF THE PRACTICE OF CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_31_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
35
|
Calhoun DA. Advances in resistant hypertension. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:294. [PMID: 30211182 PMCID: PMC6123198 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.07.21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Calhoun
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brandani L. Resistant hypertension: a therapeutic challenge. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2018; 20:76-78. [DOI: 10.1111/jch.13144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Brandani
- Prevention Department; Arterial Hypertension and Metabolic Unit; University Hospital of Favaloro Foundation; Favaloro University; Buenos Aires Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The appropriate treatment targets for individuals with elevated blood pressure (BP) have received increased attention in light of recent clinical trial results. However, it is well known that the method used to measure BP can have a significant impact on the observed BP. In this review, we summarize the existing literature on the impact of BP measurement technique on observed BP readings. RECENT FINDINGS Manual BPs obtained in-clinic routinely differ from those obtained using automated devices. Further, clinic-based readings (either manual or automated) typically correlate poorly with readings from ambulatory BP monitoring or home-based devices. However, few studies utilize randomization or sound experimental design to explore differences in BP readings by method or technique. While numerous studies report differences in BP by method, most lack statistical rigor and therefore provide limited insight into the true effect of technique on BP measurements.
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Dudenbostel T, Siddiqui M, Gharpure N, Calhoun DA. Refractory versus resistant hypertension: Novel distinctive phenotypes. JOURNAL OF NATURE AND SCIENCE 2017; 3:e430. [PMID: 29034321 PMCID: PMC5640321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Resistant hypertension (RHTN) is relatively common with an estimated prevalence of 10-20% of treated hypertensive patients. It is defined as blood pressure (BP) >140/90 mmHg treated with ≥3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic, if tolerated. Refractory hypertension is a novel phenotype of severe antihypertensive treatment failure. The proposed definition for refractory hypertension, i.e. BP >140/90 mmHg with use of ≥5 different antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) has been applied inconsistently. In comparison to RHTN, refractory hypertension seems to be less prevalent than RHTN. This review focuses on current knowledge about this novel phenotype compared with RHTN including definition, prevalence, mechanisms, characteristics and comorbidities, including cardiovascular risk. In patients with RHTN excess fluid retention is thought to be a common mechanism for the development of RHTN. Recently, evidence has emerged suggesting that refractory hypertension may be more of neurogenic etiology due to increased sympathetic activity as opposed to excess fluid retention. Treatment recommendations for RHTN are generally based on use and intensification of diuretic therapy, especially with the combination of a long-acting thiazide-like diuretic and an MRA. Based on findings from available studies, such an approach does not seem to be a successful strategy to control BP in patients with refractory hypertension and effective sympathetic inhibition in such patients, either with medications and/or device based approaches may be needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Dudenbostel
- Corresponding Author: Tanja Dudenbostel, MD, FASH, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, 933 19 Street South, Room 115, Community Health Services Building, Birmingham, AL 35294, Phone: (205) 934-9281; Fax: (205) 934-1302,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Schiefer J, Amthauer H, Genseke P, Mertens PR, Chatzikyrkou C. Position-related renal perfusion disturbances as a possible underestimated mechanism in patients with resistant hypertension: a case vignette. Int Urol Nephrol 2017; 49:1823-1833. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1656-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
41
|
|
42
|
Rosa J, Zelinka T, Petrák O, Štrauch B, Holaj R, Widimský J. Should All Patients with Resistant Hypertension Receive Spironolactone? Curr Hypertens Rep 2016; 18:81. [PMID: 27787836 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-016-0690-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ján Rosa
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Cardiocenter, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
| | - Tomáš Zelinka
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Ondřej Petrák
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Branislav Štrauch
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Robert Holaj
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiří Widimský
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Center for Hypertension, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|