Cellular aging over 13 years associated with incident antinuclear antibody positivity in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging

The Impact of Autoantibodies on Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ASCEND Trial

INTRODUCTION

Clinical practice guidelines recommend autoimmune serological testing in patients newly diagnosed with interstitial lung disease of apparently unknown cause who may have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), in order to exclude connective tissue disease (CTD). Autoantibody positivity has been associated with unique patient profiles and prognosis in patients with IPF who otherwise lack a CTD diagnosis.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of patients with IPF from the Phase III ASCEND trial (NCT01366209) evaluated the association of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) status with baseline disease characteristics, disease progression [percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), forced vital capacity (FVC) volume and progression-free survival (PFS)], and treatment outcomes with pirfenidone and placebo (%FVC, FVC and PFS).

RESULTS

Of 555 participants, 244/514 (47.5%) were ANA positive (ANA+), 83/514 (16.1%) had high ANA+ (ANA titre ≥ 1:160 or positive nucleolar- or centromere-staining patterns), 60/555 (10.8%) were RF positive (RF+) and/or anti-CCP positive (anti-CCP+) and 270/514 (52.5%) were autoantibody negative (AAb-). Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally comparable between autoantibody subgroups. Although not statistically significant, more placebo-treated participants with ANA+ or high ANA+ had a decline from baseline to Week 52 of ≥ 10% in %FVC or death (48.7% and 55.9%, respectively) or in FVC volume or death (48.7% and 47.1%, respectively) compared with the AAb- group (%FVC or death: 42.0%; FVC volume or death: 42.0%). The RF+ and/or anti-CCP+ group was similar to AAb-. No differences were observed in PFS. A treatment benefit for pirfenidone versus placebo was observed regardless of autoantibody status [PFS: ANA+ HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.37 to 0.86), P = 0.007; AAb- HR (95% CI): 0.50 (0.32 to 0.78), P = 0.002].

CONCLUSION

IPF disease course did not differ by autoantibody status in ASCEND. Pirfenidone had a treatment benefit regardless of the presence of ANA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01366209.

The development of anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibody following severe COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

The dysregulated immune response is one of the cardinal features of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study was conducted to clarify the occurrence of autoantibodies (AABs) associated with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs) in hospitalized patients with a moderate, severe, and critical form of COVID-19.

METHODS

The serum samples obtained from 176 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were investigated in this study, including patients with moderate (N = 90), severe (N = 50), and critical (N = 36) forms of COVID-19. Also, the serum samples collected from healthy subjects before the COVID-19 pandemic were used as controls (N = 176). The antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), antidouble-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA), cytoplasmic-anti neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (c-ANCA), perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA), antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), and anticyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) occurrence was evaluated using a solid-phase enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

The results showed that the occurrence of ANAs, anti-dsDNA, anti-CCP, c-ANCA, and p-ANCA was significantly higher in the COVID-19 patients compared to serum obtained from healthy subjects (p < .0001, p < .0001, p < .0001, p < .05, and p < .001, respectively). The positive number of anti-CCP tests increased significantly in severe COVID-19 compared to the moderate group (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Our study further supports the development of autoantibodies related to systemic autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study with a large sample size that reported the occurrence of anti-CCP in a severe form of COVID-19.

Circadian rhythm in systemic autoimmune conditions: Potential of chrono-immunology in clinical practice: A narrative review

The circadian rhythm (CR) is a fundamental biological process regulated by the Earth's rotation and solar cycles. It plays a critical role in various bodily functions, and its dysregulation can have systemic effects. These effects impact metabolism, redox homeostasis, cell cycle regulation, gut microbiota, cognition, and immune response. Immune mediators, cycle proteins, and hormones exhibit circadian oscillations, supporting optimal immune function and defence against pathogens. Sleep deprivation and disruptions challenge the regulatory mechanisms, making immune responses vulnerable. Altered CR pathways have been implicated in diseases such as diabetes, neurological conditions, and systemic autoimmune diseases (SADs). SADs involve abnormal immune responses to self-antigens, with genetic and environmental factors disrupting self-tolerance and contributing to conditions like Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Inflammatory Myositis. Dysregulated CR may lead to increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, contributing to the systemic responses observed in SADs. Sleep disturbances significantly impact the quality of life of patients with SADs; however, they are often overlooked. The relationship between sleep and autoimmune conditions, whether causal or consequential to CR dysregulation, remains unclear. Chrono-immunology investigates the role of CR in immunity, offering potential for targeted therapies in autoimmune conditions. This paper provides an overview of the connections between sleep and autoimmune conditions, highlighting the importance of recognizing sleep disturbances in SADs and the need for further research into the complex relationship between the CR and autoimmune diseases.

Is COVID-19 severity unrelated to antinuclear antibodies?

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces an overreaction of the immune system, resulting in the production of auto-antibodies. Several studies have reported that autoantibodies are prevalent in COVID-19 patients. In our study, antinuclear antibodies were evaluated in patients with COVID-19. We examined 131 sera from patients (>17-year-old) with confirmed COVID-19. Samples were collected prior to receiving any medication and antinuclear antibodies (ANA) levels were measured by the indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) method. Furthermore, the immunoblotting test was used to determine the presence of anti-nuclear antigen antibodies. The IIF-ANA test was positive in 36.4% (48/131) of patients. Overall, non-ICU patients had higher IIF-ANA titers than ICU patients. In particular, ICU patients had fewer nuclear, cytoplasmic, and mitotic IIF-ANA antibodies than non-ICU patients. In conclusion, COVID-19 patients frequently have ANA possibly reflecting the immune dysregulation due to several damaged cells by SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Distinct CD4+ T cell signature in ANA-positive young adult patients

Failure of immune tolerance can lead to autoantibody production resulting in autoimmune diseases, a broad spectrum of organ-specific or systemic disorders. Immune tolerance mechanisms regulate autoreactive T and B cells, yet some lymphocytes escape and promote autoantibody production. CD4+ T cell dysregulation, characterized by decreased or impaired regulatory cells (Tregs) and/or accumulation of memory and effector T cells such as TH17, plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Antinuclear antibody (ANAs) testing is used as a first step for the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders, although most ANA-positive individuals do not have nor will develop an autoimmune disease. Studying the differences of T cell compartment among healthy blood donors, ANA-negative patients and ANA-positive patients, in which loss of tolerance have not led to autoimmunity, may improve our understanding on how tolerance mechanisms fail. Herein, we report that ANA-positive patients exhibit a distinct distribution of T cell subsets: significantly reduced frequencies of recent thymic emigrants (RTE) and naïve T cells, and significantly increased frequencies of central memory T cells, TH2 and TH17 cells; modulations within the T cell compartment are most profound within the 18-40 year age range. Moreover, CD4+ T cells in ANA-positive patients are metabolically active, as determined by a significant increase in mTORC1 and mTORC2 signals, compared to ANA-negative patients and healthy blood donors. No significant impairment of Treg numbers or pro-inflammatory cytokine production was observed. These results identify a unique T cell signature associated with autoantibody production in the absence of autoimmune disease.

Autoimmunity in 2019

Based on the PubMed data, we have been performing a yearly evaluation of the publications related to autoimmune diseases and immunology to ascertain the relative weight of the former in the scientific literature. It is particularly intriguing to observe that despite the numerous new avenues of immune-related mechanisms, such as cancer immunotherapy, the proportion of immunology manuscripts related to autoimmunity continues to increase and has been approaching 20% in 2019. As in the previous 13 years, we performed an arbitrary selection of the peer-reviewed articles published by the major dedicated Journals and discussed the common themes which continue to outnumber peculiarites in autoimmune diseases. The investigated areas included systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), autoantibodies (autoAbs), and common therapeutic avenues and novel pathogenic mechanisms for autoimmune conditions. Some examples include new pathogenetic evidence which is well represented by IL21 or P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) in SLE or the application of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), mass cytometry, bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and flow cytometry for the analysis of different cellular populations in RA. Cumulatively and of interest to the clinicians, a large number of findings continue to underline the importance of a strict relationship between basic and clinical science to define new pathogenetic and therapeutic developments. The therapeutic pipeline in autoimmunity continues to grow and maintain a constant flow of new molecules, as well illustrated in RA and PsA, and this is most certainly derived from the new basic evidence and the high-throughput tools applied to autoimmune diseases.

Association between antinuclear antibody seropositivity and telomere length: a nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVES

Telomere shortening is a well-established marker of biological aging. Whether telomere erosion coincides with age-related increases in antinuclear antibody (ANA) seropositivity remains unknown. Our study aimed to determine the association between ANA seropositivity and shortened telomeres among 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) subjects.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis of 2,188 NHANES study participants with available ANA and telomere length data. ANA testing was performed using indirect immunofluorescence. Telomere lengths were measured via quantitative polymerase chain reaction methods. Applying appropriate sample weighting techniques, we used univariate and multivariate logistic regression methods to assess the association between shortened telomeres (i.e. lowest decile of the cohort) and ANA seropositivity.

RESULTS

ANAs were positive in 322 out of 2,188 (14.7%, 95% CI 13.3-16.3%) individuals. Subjects with shortened telomeres were more likely to be older (p<0.001), male (p=0.005), and have a cancer history (p<0.001). A higher proportion of non-Hispanic white participants (61.6% vs. 49.3%) and a lower proportion of non-Hispanic black participants (7.8% vs. 17.9%) had shortened telomeres (p<0.001). Shortened telomeres were not independently associated with ANA seropositivity (OR 1.48, 95% CI 0.87-2.52, p=0.14). However, female sex (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.23-2.96, p=0.006), age ≥80 years (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.08-3.92, p=0.03), and African American race (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.00-2.51, p=0.05) were independent risk factors for ANA seropositivity. Neither sex nor race modified the relationship between ANA seropositivity and telomere length.

CONCLUSIONS

Telomere erosion does not appear to be responsible for age-related increases in the prevalence of ANA seropositivity.