Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: a systematic review

Considerations for development of child abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVE

The study provides considerations for generating a phenotype of child abuse and neglect in Emergency Departments (ED) using secondary data from electronic health records (EHR). Implications will be provided for racial bias reduction and the development of further decision support tools to assist in identifying child abuse and neglect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 20 pediatric clinicians working in a single pediatric ED to gain insights about generating an EHR-based phenotype to identify children at risk for abuse and neglect.

RESULTS

Three central themes emerged from the interviews: (1) Challenges in diagnosing child abuse and neglect, (2) Health Discipline Differences in Documentation Styles in EHR, and (3) Identification of potential racial bias through documentation.

DISCUSSION

Our findings highlight important considerations for generating a phenotype for child abuse and neglect using EHR data. First, information-related challenges include lack of proper previous visit history due to limited information exchanges and scattered documentation within EHRs. Second, there are differences in documentation styles by health disciplines, and clinicians tend to document abuse in different document types within EHRs. Finally, documentation can help identify potential racial bias in suspicion of child abuse and neglect by revealing potential discrepancies in quality of care, and in the language used to document abuse and neglect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight challenges in building an EHR-based risk phenotype for child abuse and neglect. Further research is needed to validate these findings and integrate them into creation of an EHR-based risk phenotype.

Investigating the cognitive capacity constraints of an ICU care team using a systems engineering approach

Background

ICU operational conditions may contribute to cognitive overload and negatively impact on clinical decision making. We aimed to develop a quantitative model to investigate the association between the operational conditions and the quantity of medication orders as a measurable indicator of the multidisciplinary care team’s cognitive capacity.

Methods

The temporal data of patients at one medical ICU (MICU) of Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN between February 2016 to March 2018 was used. This dataset includes a total of 4822 unique patients admitted to the MICU and a total of 6240 MICU admissions. Guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model, quantifiable measures attainable from electronic medical records were identified and a conceptual framework of distributed cognition in ICU was developed. Univariate piecewise Poisson regression models were built to investigate the relationship between system-level workload indicators, including patient census and patient characteristics (severity of illness, new admission, and mortality risk) and the quantity of medication orders, as the output of the care team’s decision making.

Results

Comparing the coefficients of different line segments obtained from the regression models using a generalized F-test, we identified that, when the ICU was more than 50% occupied (patient census > 18), the number of medication orders per patient per hour was significantly reduced (average = 0.74; standard deviation (SD) = 0.56 vs. average = 0.65; SD = 0.48; p < 0.001). The reduction was more pronounced (average = 0.81; SD = 0.59 vs. average = 0.63; SD = 0.47; p < 0.001), and the breakpoint shifted to a lower patient census (16 patients) when at a higher presence of severely-ill patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation during their stay, which might be encountered in an ICU treating patients with COVID-19.

Conclusions

Our model suggests that ICU operational factors, such as admission rates and patient severity of illness may impact the critical care team’s cognitive function and result in changes in the production of medication orders. The results of this analysis heighten the importance of increasing situational awareness of the care team to detect and react to changing circumstances in the ICU that may contribute to cognitive overload.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-021-01548-7.

Physician-to-Nurse Handover: A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Different Models

OBJECTIVES

Effective professional communication and accurate transfer of relevant clinical information are crucial components of healthcare delivery. National and international health authorities strongly recommend the adoption of effective handover practice. Still, scant evidence is available on the impact of different multiprofessional handover models.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review following the Prepared Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to retrieve, pool, and critically appraise the available evidence on the effectiveness of different physician-to-nurse handover models adopted in inpatient settings.

RESULTS

We identified 1.243 citations searching the databases Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. After screening, 10 studies were included in the review reporting results on the effectiveness of 8 different handover models, measured on 44 different outcomes, grouped into: (1) process of care and efficiency outcomes, (2) patients' outcomes, and (3) healthcare professionals-related outcomes. Overall, applying structured handover tools improve healthcare practice and selected outcomes; however, not only solid evidence on the effectiveness of different handover models is scant but also global consensus is lacking on which standardized measures and indicators to use to assess their impact.

CONCLUSIONS

In times of healthcare delivery models of growing complexity, multiprofessional handover is a key component of care paths. Although there is overall consensus on the need for improving the quality and safety of multiprofessional handover, the evidence on the tools available to achieve it and the metrics to measure their impact is heterogeneous. We urge that rigorous studies are conducted to inform the planning, implementation, and monitoring of effective handover, with the ultimate aim of improving quality of care and patient safety.

Pilot Testing of Simulation in the Evaluation of a Novel, Rapidly Deployable Electronic Health Record for use in Disaster Intensive Care

OBJECTIVES

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has highlighted the need for rapid creation and management of ICU field hospitals with effective remote monitoring which is dependent on the rapid deployment and integration of an Electronic Health Record (EHR). We describe the use of simulation to evaluate a rapidly scalable hub-and-spoke model for EHR deployment and monitoring using asynchronous training.

METHODS

We adapted existing commercial EHR products to serve as the point of entry from a simulated hospital and a separate system for tele-ICU support and monitoring of the interfaced data. To train our users we created a modular video-based curriculum to facilitate asynchronous training. Effectiveness of the curriculum was assessed through completion of common ICU documentation tasks in a high-fidelity simulation. Additional endpoints include assessment of EHR navigation, user satisfaction (Net Promoter), system usability (System Usability Scale-SUS), and cognitive load (NASA-TLX).

RESULTS

A total of 5 participants achieved a 100% task completion on all domains except ventilator data (91%). Systems demonstrated high degrees of satisfaction (Net Promoter = 65.2), acceptable usability (SUS = 66.5), and acceptable cognitive load (NASA-TLX = 41.5); with higher levels of cognitive load correlating with the number of screens employed.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical usability of a comprehensive and rapidly deployable EHR was acceptable in an intensive care simulation which was preceded by < 1 hour of video education about the EHR. This model should be considered in plans for integrated clinical response with remote and accessory facilities.

Information handoffs in critical care and their implications for information quality: A socio-technical network approach

OBJECTIVE

The design of health ICTs, as well as human factors, have been shown to influence patient information quality. The aim of this study was to understand how patterns of interaction between these factors influence information quality aspects in a critical care environment.

METHOD

We conducted an ethnographic study of socio-technical information handoffs in a critical care unit. Data collection methods included non-participant observations and semi-structured interviews. Methodological principles from network analysis (SNA, VNA) were used to develop visual network diagrams, as well as to analyze the composition of the information network and its influence on patient information quality.

RESULTS

The network patterns that emerged uncover that human actors have many information processing and dissemination roles at the critical care unit. However, ICTs play key network roles, acting as information intermediaries and gatekeepers. We further identify three types of information handoffs in the critical care environment - human-human, human-ICT and ICT-human. On the one hand, we find that human-human and ICT-human handoffs influence contextual and intrinsic aspects of patient information, such as information completeness and accuracy. On the other hand, human-ICT handoffs influence information accessibility and representational quality, such as consistency and interpretability.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that standardizing change of shift handoff communication may not be sufficient to prevent information decay in complex care trajectories. In particular, we argue that ensuring information consistency and interpretability across disciplines and professions is as important as ensuring information completeness and accuracy during change of shift handoffs. ICT and workflow design opportunities are discussed as means to address overlapping or conflicting information needs across disciplines and professions, increase information consistency, and reduce information redundancy across the network.

Clinical handover and handoff in healthcare: a systematic review of systematic reviews

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review is to appraise and summarize existing literature on clinical handover.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Included articles were reviewed independently by the review team.

DATA EXTRACTION

The review team extracted data under the following headers: author(s), year of publication, journal, scope, search strategy, number of studies included, type of studies included, study quality assessment, used definition of handover, healthcare setting, outcomes measured, findings and finally some comments or remarks.

RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS

First, research indicates that poor handover is associated with multiple potential hazards such as lack of availability of required equipment for patients, information omissions, diagnosis errors, treatment errors, disposition errors and treatment delays. Second, our systematic review indicates that no single tool arises as best for any particular specialty or use to evaluate the handover process. Third, there is little evidence delineating what constitutes best handoff practices. Most efforts facilitated the coordination of care and communication between healthcare professionals using electronic tools or a standardized form. Fourth, our review indicates that the principal teaching methods are role-playing and simulation, which may result in better knowledge transfer to the work environment, better health and patients' well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

This review emphasizes the importance of staff education (including simulation-based and team training), non-technical skills and the implementation process of clinical handover in healthcare settings.

Implementing a Warm Handoff Between Hospital and Skilled Nursing Facility Clinicians

OBJECTIVES

Care transitions between hospitals and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) are associated with disruptions in patient care and high risk for adverse events. Communication between hospital-based and SNF-based clinicians is often suboptimal; there have been calls to foster direct, real-time communication between sending and receiving clinicians to enhance patient safety. This article described the implementation of a warm handoff between hospital and SNF physicians and advanced practice providers at the time of hospital discharge.

METHODS

Before patient transfer, hospital clinicians called SNF clinicians to provide information relevant to the continuation of safe patient care and offer SNF clinicians the opportunity to ask clarifying questions. The calls were documented in the hospital discharge summary.

RESULTS

A total of 2417 patient discharges were eligible for inclusion. Warm handoffs were documented at an increasing rate throughout implementation of the intervention, beginning with 15.78% (n = 3) in stage 1, then 20.27% (n = 75) in stage 2, and finally 46.89% (n = 951) in stage 3. The overall average rate of documentation was 42.57%. Participant feedback indicated that clinicians were most concerned about understanding the purpose of the warm handoff, managing their workload, and improving the efficiency of the process.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a warm handoff showed promise in improving communication during hospital-SNF patient transfers. However, the implementation also highlighted specific barriers to the handoff related to organizational structures and clinician workload. Addressing these underlying issues will be critical in ensuring continued participation and support for efforts that foster direct communication among clinicians from different healthcare institutions.

Use of content management systems to address nursing workflow

Nurses are at the forefront of providing healthcare services to individuals of all age groups and with varying medical conditions. Aside from the critical knowledge and technical skills from nursing science, advancement in technology has assisted nurses in delivering quality nursing care by streamlining workflow processes and ensuring that data can easily be retrieved or modified. Electronic health records dramatically changed the landscape of the healthcare practice by providing an electronic means to store data and for healthcare professionals to retrieve and manipulate health information in a secured and collaborative environment. But with the nature of data being stored in the electronic health records, nurses still need to organize and process these data into relevant information, knowledge or wisdom so they can provide better holistic care to patients. This discussion paper details the role of content management systems in addressing nursing workflow by providing a mechanism for nurses to be developers themselves, and not just users or consumers of health innovative technologies. By using content management systems as platform for application development, nurses or other healthcare professionals, may be able to address problems with internal workflow without having to incur huge amounts in software development, or having to extensively learn programming languages.

Perceptions and Experiences of Hospital Nurses During Transition to an Electronic Handover Informatics System

An effective patient transfer, or handover, among healthcare professionals can help prevent communication-related medical errors, and a reliable electronic handover informatics system can standardize the handoff process. Adapting to a new handover system may cause stress for nurses. This descriptive qualitative study aimed to explore the perceptions and transition experiences of hospital nurses in adopting and adapting to a new handover informatics system. Thirty-eight nurses at a medical center in Taiwan participated in the study from December 2016 to January 2017. The researcher conducted five focus group interviews and analyzed all responses using content analysis. Results showed three major themes: "Perceptions of challenges and barriers related to the transition to a new handover informatics system," "Perceptions of benefits and strategies to the transition to a new handover informatics system," and "Suggestions for successful implementation of a new handover informatics system." Five subthemes emerged from the first theme, and six subthemes emerged from the second theme. The results of this study could enhance our understanding of nurses' perceptions and experiences with transition to a new handover informatics system and could provide a reference for hospitals to develop individualized strategies to facilitate the implementation of a handover informatics system.

Communication at Transitions of Care

Communication errors during transitions of care are a leading source of adverse events for hospitalized patients. This article provides an overview of the role of communication errors in adverse events, describes the complexities of communication for hospitalized patients, and provides evidence regarding the positive effects of applying high-reliability principles to transitions of care and culture of safety. Elements of effective handoffs and a detailed approach for successful implementation of a handoff program are provided. The role of handoff communication in medical education at all levels, as well as for the interprofessional team, is discussed.

Six Sigma Methodology and Postoperative Information Reporting: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Study With Interrupted Time-Series Regression

OBJECTIVE

The postoperative handover is often compromised by reporting inconsistencies between different specialties. We describe a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to improve postoperative information reporting.

DESIGN

A quality improvement project with interrupted time-series data collection was undertaken in the postanesthesia care unit between January 2015 and August 2015. We utilized Six Sigma methodology to engage multispecialty stakeholders in identifying deficiencies in the existing postoperative handover process in January 2015. A standardized handover process including a checklist and electronic handover note was implemented within a postanesthesia care unit in June 2015. Direct observations of handovers were conducted to determine reporting accuracy, handover duration, and specialty representative attendance. Segmented linear and logistic regression analyses were used for interrupted time-series data.

SETTING

Single postanesthesia care unit at an academic tertiary referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Physician trainees in anesthesia (n = 82) and surgical subspecialties (n = 139), certified registered nurse anesthetists (n = 57), and recovery room registered nurses (n = 139).

RESULTS

Cumulative handover scores increased by 18.3 points in the postimplementation period (n = 70) when compared to preimplementation handovers (n = 69), a finding which remained statistically significant after adjusting for preintervention time trends (difference 16 points; 95% confidence intervals 3-31; p = 0.021). No statistically significant difference in handover duration was seen between cohorts (6.8 minutes vs 6.1 minutes, difference 0.5 minutes; 95% confidence intervals -2.8 to 3.7; p = 0.78). Three years postimplementation, there was consistent use of a modified electronic handover note and surgical subspecialty attendance during handover.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized handover process was associated with improved information reporting among different surgical disciplines without significantly lengthening handover duration.

A graph-based approach for characterizing resident and nurse handoff conversations

Prior research has used a variety of qualitative and quantitative approaches for studying handoff communication. Due to the dynamic and interactive nature of handoffs, characterizing the structure and content of these conversations is challenging. In this paper, we use a graph-based approach to characterize handoff communication as a conversation network. Conversation networks were used to compare the structural properties of resident-resident and nurse-nurse handoff communication. Resident (n = 149) and nurse (n = 126) handoff conversations from general medicine units were coded using a previously validated clinical content framework. The coded conversations were then translated into separate resident and nurse conversation networks, and were compared using 11 network measures. Transition probabilities were used to identify commonly repeating sub-networks within resident and nurse conversations. There were significant differences between resident and nurse conversation networks in 10 of the 11 network measures. There were also significant differences in the structure of conversations: compared to resident conversations, nurse conversations were focused on fewer clinical content categories and had more branching and switching between clinical content categories; however, there were clinically-relevant organic relationships in the order of presentation of clinical content among both resident and nurse handoff conversations. We discuss the potential for using graph-based approach as an alternative method for characterizing interactive conversations and also suggest future directions for using network-based approaches for analyzing handoff conversations.

Role of Transitional Care Measures in the Prevention of Readmission After Critical Illness

Transitioning from the critical care unit to the medical-surgical care area is vital to patients' recovery and resolution of critical illness. Such transitions are necessary to optimize use of available hospital resources to meet patient care needs. One in 10 patients discharged from the intensive care unit are readmitted to the unit during their hospitalization. Critical care readmission is associated with significant increases in illness acuity, overall length of stay, and health care costs as well as a potential 4-fold increased risk of mortality. Patients with complex illness, multiple comorbid conditions, and a prolonged initial stay in the critical care unit are at an increased risk of being readmitted to the critical care unit and experiencing poor outcomes. Implementing nurse-driven measures that support continuity of care and consistent communication practices such as critical care outreach services, transitional communication tools, discharge planning, and transitional care units improves transitions of patients from the critical care environment and reduces readmission rates.

Cognitive Maps to Visualise Clinical Cases in Handovers

Background: Clinical handovers at changes of shifts are typical scenarios of time restricted and information intensive communication, which are highly cognitively demanding. The currently available applications supporting handovers typically present complex information in a textual checklist-like manner. This presentation style has been criticised for not meeting the specific user requirements.

Objectives: We, therefore, aimed at developing a concept for visualising the overview of a clinical case that serves as an alternative way to checklist-like presentations in clinical handovers. We also aimed at implementing this concept in a handoverEHR in order to support the pre-handover phase, the actual handover, and the post-handover phase as well as at evaluating its usability and attractiveness.

Results: We developed and implemented a concept that draws on Tolman’s pioneering work on cognitive maps that we designed in accordance with Gestalt principles. These maps provide a pictorial overview of a clinical case. The application to build, manipulate, and store the cognitive maps was integrated into an openEHR based handover record that extends conventional records with handover specific information. Usability (n = 28) and attractiveness (n = 26) testing with experienced clinicians resulted in good ratings for suitability for the task as well as for attractiveness and pragmatism.

Conclusion: We propose cognitive maps to represent and visualise the clinical case in situations where there is limited time to present complex information.

Using mobile devices for inpatient rounding and handoffs: an innovative application developed and rapidly adopted by clinicians in a pediatric hospital

Objective

To describe the usage of a novel application (The FLOW) that allows mobile devices to be used for rounding and handoffs.

Materials and Methods

The FLOW provides a view of patient data and the capacity to enter short notes via personal mobile devices. It was deployed using a "bring-your-own-device" model in 4 pilot units. Social network analysis (SNA) was applied to audit trails in order to visualize usage patterns. A questionnaire was used to describe user experience.

Results

Overall, 253 health professionals used The FLOW with their personal mobile devices from October 2013 to March 2015. In pediatric and neonatal intensive care units (ICUs), a median of 26-26.5 notes were entered per user per day. Visual network representation of app entries showed that usage patterns were different between the ICUs. In 127 questionnaires (50%), respondents reported using The FLOW most often to enter notes and for handoffs. The FLOW was perceived as having improved patient care by 57% of respondents, compared to usual care. Most respondents (86%) wished to continue using The FLOW.

Discussion

This study shows how a handoff and rounding tool was quickly adopted in pediatric and neonatal ICUs in a hospital setting where patient charts were still paper-based. Originally developed as a tool to support informal documentation using smartphones, it was adapted to local practices and expanded to print sign-out documents and import notes within the medicolegal record with desktop computers. Interestingly, even if not supported by the nursing administrative authorities, the level of use for data entry among nurses and doctors was similar in all units, indicating close collaboration in documentation practices in these ICUs.

Ethnographic analysis on the use of the electronic medical record for clinical handoff

The objective of this study was to understand the social elements of clinical and organizational interactions of the key stakeholders in the specific context of an electronic dashboard used by the emergency department (ED) and inpatient medicine teams at the time of clinical referral and handover. An electronic handover function is utilised at the ED-inpatient interface at this institution and has given clinicians the ability to better communicate, monitor the department and strive to improve patient safety in streamline the delivery of care in the acute phase. This study uses an ethnographic qualitative research design incorporating semistructured interviews, participant observation on the ED floor and fieldwork notes. The setting for this research was in the ED at a tertiary University affiliated hospital. Triangulation was used to combine information obtained from multiple sources and information from fieldwork and interviews refined into useable chunks culminating in a thematic analysis. Thematic analysis yielded five central themes that reflected how the clinical staff utilised this IT system and why it had become embedded in the culture of clinical referral and handover. Efficient time management for improved patient flow was demonstrated, value added communication (at the interpersonal level), the building trust at the ED-inpatient interface, the maintenance of mutual respect across medical cultures and an overall enhancement of the quality of ED communication (in terms of the information available). A robust electronic handover process, resulted in an integrated approach to patient care by removing barriers to admission for medical inpatients, admitted via ED. The value proposition for patients was a more complete information transfer, both within the ED and between departments.

Impact of an integrated electronic handover tool on pediatric junior medical staff (JMS) handover

BACKGROUND

Clinical medical handover between doctors forms a critical part of the patient care process. However, with the evolution of junior medical staff (JMS) working conditions, time pressure and increasing clinical and administrative loads mean that quality clinical handover is increasingly important yet more challenging to achieve. This study evaluated the impact of a newly integrated electronic handover tool on JMS adoption and usage of the tool, as well as impacts on the quality (accuracy and redundancy) of handover data, JMS perceived workflow (time management and communication) and JMS satisfaction.

FINDINGS

The majority of JMS surveyed used the tool at 1 (87.0%) and 3 (67.4%) months post implementation. After the introduction of the electronic handover tool, 67.5% of users spent less than 15min updating handover data in the electronic handover tool, compared to just 6.7% prior to the introduction. 28.3% of respondents noted that there was >25% redundant data, compared to more than half (52.2%) prior to introduction of the electronic tool. Overall JMS satisfaction with their handover process was significantly higher post implementation of the integrated electronic handover report (17.4% pre, 80.4% at 1 month, 67.4% at 3 months).

CONCLUSION

A newly introduced integrated electronic medical record handover tool had a high uptake amongst JMS, and resulted in improvement in perceived handover efficiency, a reduction in redundant data entry and improved JMS handover satisfaction.

A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward

PURPOSE

To provide a 360-degree description of ICU-to-ward transfers.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 451 adults transferred from a medical-surgical ICU to a hospital ward in 10 Canadian hospitals July 2014-January 2016. Transfer processes documented in the medical record. Patient (or delegate) and provider (ICU/ward physician/nurse) perspectives solicited by survey 24-72 h after transfer.

RESULTS

Medical records (100%) and survey responses (ICU physicians-80%, ICU nurses-80%, ward physicians-46%, ward nurses-64%, patients-74%) were available for most transfers. The median time from initiation to completion of transfer was 25 h (IQR 6-52). ICU physicians and nurses reported communicating with counterparts via telephone (78 and 75%) when transfer was requested (82 and 24%) or accepted (31 and 59%) and providing more elements of clinical information than ward physicians (mean 4.7 vs. 3.9, p < 0.001) and nurses (5.0 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001) reported receiving. Patients were more likely to report satisfaction with the transfer when they received more information (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18-1.48), had their questions addressed (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.33-11.84), met the ward physician prior to transfer (OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.90-7.33), and were assessed by a nurse within 1 h of ward arrival (OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.29-9.66). Recommendations for improvement included having a documented care plan travel with the patient (all stakeholders), standardized face-to-face handover (physicians), avoiding transfers at shift change (nurses) and informing patients about pending transfers in advance (patients).

CONCLUSIONS

ICU-to-ward transfers are characterized by failures of patient flow and communication; experienced differently by patients, ICU/ward physicians and nurses, with distinct suggestions for improvement.

Patient safety in nursing homes in Sweden: nurses’ views on safety and their role

Objective

Knowledge about patient safety in nursing homes is limited. The aim of this study was to describe what patient safety means to nurses working in nursing homes for the elderly and how these nurses address patient safety.

Method

Qualitative study of semi-structured interviews with 15 nurses aged 27–62 years. Qualitative content analysis was applied.

Results

Nurses describe the meaning of patient safety in terms of proper care and treatment, and a sense of security. Based on nurses’ description of patient safety, several factors were identified as prerequisites to achieve safe health care: competence; clear information transfer between health care organizations; continuity of care and appropriate environment. Barriers to patient safety were described as lack of sufficient resources; lack of communication and negative attitudes to incident reporting. To a great extent, nurses’ work for patient safety consists of efforts to compensate for defects and ensure good health care in their daily work, since work with patient safety is not a management priority.

Conclusion

Patient safety needs to be clarified and prioritized in nursing homes, and there is a need to understand nurses’ role among other care givers and the need for shared routines among care givers.

Impact of an electronic handoff documentation tool on team shared mental models in pediatric critical care

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of the implementation of an electronic handoff tool (the Handoff Tool) on shared mental models (SMM) within patient care teams as measured by content overlap and discrepancies in verbal handoff presentations given by different clinicians caring for the same patient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Researchers observed, recorded, and transcribed verbal handoffs given by different members of patient care teams in a pediatric intensive care unit. The transcripts were qualitatively coded and analyzed for content overlap scores and the number of discrepancies in handoffs of different team members before and after the implementation of the tool.

RESULTS

Content overlap scores did not change post-implementation. The average number of discrepancies nearly doubled following the implementation (from 0.76 discrepancies per handoff group pre-implementation to 1.17 discrepancies per handoff group post-implementation); however, this change was not statistically significant (p=0.37). Discrepancies classified as related to dosage of treatment or procedure and to patients' symptoms increased in frequency post-implementation.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that the Handoff Tool did not have the desired positive impact on SMM within patient care teams. Future electronic tools for facilitating team handoff may need longer implementation times, complementary changes to handoff process and structure, and improved designs that integrate a common core of shared information with discipline-specific records.

CONCLUSION

While electronic handoff tools provide great opportunities to improve communication and facilitate the formation of shared mental models within patient care teams, further work is necessary to realize their full potential.

Integrating the Electronic Health Record into high-fidelity interprofessional intensive care unit simulations

With the rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHR), there is a growing appreciation for the central role they play in clinical decision making and team communication, with many studies documenting new safety issues with integration of the EHR into the clinical enterprise. To study these issues, we created a high-fidelity simulation instance of our clinical EHR. In this paper, we describe the impact of integrating the EHR into high-fidelity, interprofessional intensive care unit (ICU) simulations, and the errors induced. We found a number of safety issues directly related to the EHR including alert fatigue, negative impacts on interprofessional communication, and problems with selective data gathering, and these issues were present for all members of the interprofessional team. Through successful integration of the EHR into high-fidelity team-based simulations, we now have an infrastructure to focus educational initiative and deploy informatics solutions to mitigate these safety issues.

Transition of Care Practices from Emergency Department to Inpatient: Survey Data and Development of Algorithm

Introduction

We aimed to assess the current scope of handoff education and practice among resident physicians in academic centers and to propose a standardized handoff algorithm for the transition of care from the emergency department (ED) to an inpatient setting.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional survey targeted at the program directors, associate or assistant program directors, and faculty members of emergency medicine (EM) residency programs in the United States (U.S.). The web-based survey was distributed to potential subjects through a listserv. A panel of experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop a standardized algorithm for ED to inpatient handoff.

Results

121 of 172 programs responded to the survey for an overall response rate of 70.3%. Our survey showed that most EM programs in the U.S. have some form of handoff training, and the majority of them occur either during orientation or in the clinical setting. The handoff structure from ED to inpatient is not well standardized, and in those places with a formalized handoff system, over 70% of residents do not uniformly follow it. Approximately half of responding programs felt that their current handoff system was safe and effective. About half of the programs did not formally assess the handoff proficiency of trainees. Handoffs most commonly take place over the phone, though respondents disagree about the ideal place for a handoff to occur, with nearly equivalent responses between programs favoring the bedside over the phone or face-to-face on a computer. Approximately two-thirds of responding programs reported that their residents were competent in performing ED to inpatient handoffs. Based on this survey and on the review of the literature, we developed a five-step algorithm for the transition of care from the ED to the inpatient setting.

Conclusion

Our results identified the current trends of education and practice in transitions of care, from the ED to the inpatient setting in U.S. academic medical centers. An algorithm, which guides this process, is proposed to address the current gap in the standardized approach to ED to inpatient handoffs that were identified in the survey’s assessment of needs.

The Hidden Lives of Nurses' Cognitive Artifacts

BACKGROUND

Standardizing nursing handoffs at shift change is recommended to improve communication, with electronic tools as the primary approach. However, nurses continue to rely on personally created paper-based cognitive artifacts - their "paper brains" - to support handoffs, indicating a deficiency in available electronic versions.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this qualitative study was to develop a deep understanding of nurses' paper-based cognitive artifacts in the context of a cancer specialty hospital.

METHODS

After completing 73 hours of hospital unit field observations, 13 medical oncology nurses were purposively sampled, shadowed for a single shift and interviewed using a semi-structured technique. An interpretive descriptive study design guided analysis of the data corpus of field notes, transcribed interviews, images of nurses' paper-based cognitive artifacts, and analytic memos.

RESULTS

Findings suggest nurses' paper brains are personal, dynamic, living objects that undergo a life cycle during each shift and evolve over the course of a nurse's career. The life cycle has four phases: Creation, Application, Reproduction, and Destruction. Evolution in a nurse's individually styled, paper brain is triggered by a change in the nurse's environment that reshapes cognitive needs. If a paper brain no longer provides cognitive support in the new environment, it is modified into (adapted) or abandoned (made extinct) for a different format that will provide the necessary support.

CONCLUSIONS

The "hidden lives" - the life cycle and evolution - of paper brains have implications for the design of successful electronic tools to support nursing practice, including handoff. Nurses' paper brains provide cognitive support beyond the context of handoff. Information retrieval during handoff is undoubtedly an important function of nurses' paper brains, but tools designed to standardize handoff communication without accounting for cognitive needs during all phases of the paper brain life cycle or the ability to evolve with changes to those cognitive needs will be underutilized.

Information Needs Assessment for a Medicine Ward-Focused Rounding Dashboard

To identify the routine information needs of inpatient clinicians on the general wards for the development of an electronic dashboard. Survey of internal medicine and subspecialty clinicians from March 2014-July 2014 at Saint Marys Hospital in Rochester, Minnesota. An information needs assessment was generated from all unique data elements extracted from all handoff and rounding tools used by clinicians in our ICUs and general wards. An electronic survey was distributed to 104 inpatient medical providers. 89 unique data elements were identified from currently utilized handoff and rounding instruments. All data elements were present in our multipurpose ICU-based dashboard. 42 of 104 (40 %) surveys were returned. Data elements important (50/89, 56 %) and unimportant (24/89, 27 %) for routine use were identified. No significant differences in data element ranking were observed between supervisory and nonsupervisory roles. The routine information needs of general ward clinicians are a subset of data elements used routinely by ICU clinicians. Our findings suggest an electronic dashboard could be adapted from the critical care setting to the general wards with minimal modification.

A Mobile, Collaborative, Real Time Task List for Inpatient Environments

BACKGROUND

Inpatient teams commonly track their tasks using paper checklists that are not shared between team members. Team members frequently communicate redundantly in order to prevent errors.

METHODS

We created a mobile, collaborative, real-time task list application on the iOS platform. The application listed tasks for each patient, allowed users to check them off as completed, and transmitted that information to all other team members. In this report, we qualitatively describe our experience designing and piloting the application with an inpatient pediatric ward team at an academic pediatric hospital.

RESULTS

We successfully created the tasklist application, however team members showed limited usage.

CONCLUSION

Physicians described that they preferred the immediacy and familiarity of paper, and did not experience an efficiency benefit when using the electronic tasklist.

The Symbolic Functions of Nurses' Cognitive Artifacts on a Medical Oncology Unit

Acute care nurses continue to rely on personally created paper-based tools-their "paper brains"-to support work during a shift, although standardized handoff tools are recommended. This interpretive descriptive study examines the functions these paper brains serve beyond handoff in the medical oncology unit at a cancer specialty hospital. Thirteen medical oncology nurses were each shadowed for a single shift and interviewed afterward using a semistructured technique. Field notes, transcribed interviews, images of nurses' paper brains, and analytic memos were inductively coded, and analysis revealed paper brains are symbols of patient and nurse identity. Caution is necessary when attempting to standardize nurses' paper brains as nurses may be resistant to such changes due to their pride in constructing personal artifacts to support themselves and their patients.

Handoffs and Patient Safety: Grasping the Story and Painting a Full Picture

Effective handoff communication is critical for patient safety. Research is needed to understand how information processes occurring intra-shift impact handoff effectiveness. The purpose of this qualitative study was to examine medical-surgical nurses' (n = 21) perspectives about processes that promote and hinder patient safety intra-shift and during handoff. Results indicated that offgoing nurses' ability to grasp the story intra-shift was essential to convey the full picture during handoff. When oncoming nurses understood the picture being conveyed at the handoff, nurses jointly painted a full picture. Arriving and leaving the handoff with this level of information promoted patient safety. However, intra-shift disruptions often impeded nurses in their processes to grasp the story thus posing risks to patient safety. Improvement efforts need to target the different processes involved in grasping the story and painting a full picture. Future research needs to examine handoff practices and outcomes on units with good and poor practice environments.

Variation in printed handoff documents: Results and recommendations from a multicenter needs assessment

BACKGROUND

Handoffs of patient care are a leading root cause of medical errors. Standardized techniques exist to minimize miscommunications during verbal handoffs, but studies to guide standardization of printed handoff documents are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether variability exists in the content of printed handoff documents and to identify key data elements that should be uniformly included in these documents.

SETTING

Pediatric hospitalist services at 9 institutions in the United States and Canada.

METHODS

Sample handoff documents from each institution were reviewed, and structured group interviews were conducted to understand each institution's priorities for written handoffs. An expert panel reviewed all handoff documents and structured group-interview findings, and subsequently made consensus-based recommendations for data elements that were either essential or recommended, including best overall printed handoff practices.

RESULTS

Nine sites completed structured group interviews and submitted data. We identified substantial variation in both the structure and content of printed handoff documents. Only 4 of 23 possible data elements (17%) were uniformly present in all sites' handoff documents. The expert panel recommended the following as essential for all printed handoffs: assessment of illness severity, patient summary, action items, situation awareness and contingency plans, allergies, medications, age, weight, date of admission, and patient and hospital service identifiers. Code status and several other elements were also recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variation exists in the content of printed handoff documents. Standardizing printed handoff documents has the potential to decrease omissions of key data during patient care transitions, which may decrease the risk of downstream medical errors.

Are attendings different? Intensivists explain their handoff ideals, perceptions, and practices

PURPOSE

What is known about physician handoffs is almost entirely limited to resident practice, but attending physicians ultimately determine care plans and goals of care. This study sought to understand what is unique about attending intensivist handoffs, to identify perceptions of the ideal content and format of intensive care unit (ICU) attending handoffs, and to understand how ideal and reported practices are aligned in the delivery of care.

METHODS

Intensivists in active practice in U.S. adult academic ICUs were purposively sampled and interviewed over 9 months in 2011 to 2012.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Thirty attendings from 15 institutions in nine U.S. states were interviewed. Subjects' specialties included anesthesiology, emergency medicine, internal medicine, and surgery. The "perfect handoff" was described as succinct, included verbal plus written communication, and took place in person. Respondents believed that the attending handoff should be less detailed than resident handoffs. Most attendings participated in handoffs at the end of each ICU rotation (n = 26). Standardized handoff practice was rare (n = 1). Media used for handoffs included combinations of telephone conversations (n = 25), in-person communications (n = 11), e-mail (n = 9), or text message (n = 2). Handoff duration varied from 10 to 120 minutes for 5 to 42 patients. Five of 30 respondents had undergone formal training in how to conduct handoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

A national sample of academic intensivists identified common ideal attributes of attending handoffs, yet their reported handoff practices varied widely. Ideal handoff practices may form the basis of future interventions to improve communication between intensivists.

Improving the quality and safety of care on the medical ward: A review and synthesis of the evidence base

Despite its place at the heart of inpatient medicine, the evidence base underpinning the effective delivery of medical ward care is highly fragmented. Clinicians familiar with the selection of evidence-supported treatments for specific diseases may be less aware of the evolving literature surrounding the organisation of care on the medical ward. This review is the first synthesis of that disparate literature. An iterative search identified relevant publications, using terms pertaining to medical ward environments, and objective and subjective patient outcomes. Articles (including reviews) were selected on the basis of their focus on medical wards, and their relevance to the quality and safety of ward-based care. Responses to medical ward failings are grouped into five common themes: staffing levels and team composition; interdisciplinary communication and collaboration; standardisation of care; early recognition and treatment of the deteriorating patient; and local safety climate. Interventions in these categories are likely to improve the quality and safety of care in medical wards, although the evidence supporting them is constrained by methodological limitations and inadequate investment in multicentre trials. Nonetheless, with infrequent opportunities to redefine their services, institutions are increasingly adopting multifaceted strategies that encompass groups of these themes. As the literature on the quality of inpatient care moves beyond its initial focus on the intensive care unit and operating theatre, physicians should be mindful of opportunities to incorporate evidence-based practice at a ward level.

Towards an Ontology for Interdisciplinary Handoff Communication in Intensive Care

Handoffs are considered a vulnerable point in the clinical workflow. A recent report by The Joint Commission (TJC) found that nearly 80% of communication errors occur during care transitions. While there has been significant research on handoff tools and their use, it can be argued that there is variability among the handoff tools used in current practice. We conducted a multi-year, longitudinal evaluation on the nature of content and structure of handoffs among residents and nurses in a medical intensive care unit (MICU). In this paper, we report on our top-level findings regarding the use of a body-systems based formatted tool that supported standardized, interactive and effective communication for both medical and nursing practice. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our results for the design and development of future handoff tools.

Patient care transitions from the emergency department to the medicine ward: evaluation of a standardized electronic signout tool

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a new electronic handoff tool for emergency department to medicine ward patient transfers over a 1-year period.

DESIGN

Prospective mixed-methods analysis of data submitted by medicine residents following admitting shifts before and after eSignout implementation.

SETTING

University-based, tertiary-care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Internal medicine resident physicians admitting patients from the emergency department.

INTERVENTION

An electronic handoff tool (eSignout) utilizing automated paging communication and responsibility acceptance without mandatory verbal communication between emergency department and medicine ward providers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

(i) Incidence of reported near misses/adverse events, (ii) communication of key clinical information and quality of verbal communication and (iii) characterization of near misses/adverse events.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight of 80 surveys (98%) and 1058 of 1388 surveys (76%) were completed before and after eSignout implementation. Compared with pre-intervention, residents in the post-intervention period reported similar number of shifts with a near miss/adverse event (10.3 vs. 7.8%; P = 0.27), similar communication of key clinical information, and improved verbal signout quality, when it occurred. Compared with the former process requiring mandatory verbal communication, 93% believed the eSignout was more efficient and 61% preferred the eSignout. Patient safety issues related to perceived sufficiency/accuracy of diagnosis, treatment or disposition, and information quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The eSignout was perceived as more efficient and preferred over the mandatory verbal signout process. Rates of reported adverse events were similar before and after the intervention. Our experience suggests electronic platforms with optional verbal communication can be used to standardize and improve the perceived efficiency of patient handoffs.

Electronic handoff instruments: a truly multidisciplinary tool?

The objective was to assess use of a physician handoff tool embedded in the electronic medical record by nurses and other non-physicians. We administered a survey to nurses, physical therapists, discharge planners, social workers, and others to assess integration into daily practice, usefulness, and accuracy of the handoff tool. 231 individuals (61% response) participated. 60% used the tool often or usually/always during a shift. Nurses (46%) used the tool for shift transitions and found it helpful for medical history (79%) but not for acquiring medication, allergy, and responsible physician information. Nurses (96%) and others (75%) rated the tool as accurate. Medical nurses rated the tool more useful than surgical nurses, and pediatric nurses rarely used the tool. The tool was integrated into the daily workflow of non-physicians despite being designed for physician use. Non-physicians should be included in the design and implementation of electronic patient handoff systems.

A systematic review of the literature on the evaluation of handoff tools: implications for research and practice

OBJECTIVE

Given the complexities of the healthcare environment, efforts to develop standardized handoff practices have led to widely varying manifestations of handoff tools. A systematic review of the literature on handoff evaluation studies was performed to investigate the nature, methodological, and theoretical foundations underlying the evaluation of handoff tools and their adequacy and appropriateness in achieving standardization goals.

METHOD

We searched multiple databases for articles evaluating handoff tools published between 1 February 1983 and 15 June 2012. The selected articles were categorized along the following dimensions: handoff tool characteristics, standardization initiatives, methodological framework, and theoretical perspectives underlying the evaluation.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles met our inclusion criteria. Handoff evaluations were conducted primarily on electronic tools (64%), with a more recent focus on electronic medical record-integrated tools (36% since 2008). Most evaluations centered on intra-departmental tools (95%). Evaluation studies were quasi-experimental (42%) or observational (50%), with a major focus on handoff-related outcome measures (94%) using predominantly survey-based tools (70%) with user satisfaction metrics (53%). Most of the studies (81%) based their evaluation on aspects of standardization that included continuity of care and patient safety.

CONCLUSIONS

The nature, methodological, and theoretical foundations of handoff tool evaluations varied significantly in terms of their quality and rigor, thereby limiting their ability to inform strategic standardization initiatives. Future research should utilize rigorous, multi-method qualitative and quantitative approaches that capture the contextual nuances of handoffs, and evaluate their effect on patient-related outcomes.

Implementation of a computerized patient handoff application

For hospitalized patients, handoffs between providers affect continuity of care and increase the risk of medical errors. Most commercial electronic health record (EHR) systems lack dedicated tools to support patient handoff activities. We developed a collaborative application supporting patient handoff that is fully integrated with our commercial EHR. The application creates user-customizable printed reports with automatic inclusion of a variety of EHR data, including: allergies, medications, 24-hour vital signs, recent common laboratory test results, isolation requirements, and code status. It has achieved widespread voluntary use at our institution (6,100 monthly users; 700 daily reports generated), and we have distributed the application to several other institutions using the same EHR. Though originally designed for resident physicians, today about 50% of the application users are nurses, 40% are physicians/physician assistants/nurse practitioners, and 10% are pharmacists, social workers, and other allied health providers.

Content and functional specifications for a standards-based multidisciplinary rounding tool to maintain continuity across acute and critical care

BACKGROUND

Maintaining continuity of care (CoC) in the inpatient setting is dependent on aligning goals and tasks with the plan of care (POC) during multidisciplinary rounds (MDRs). A number of locally developed rounding tools exist, yet there is a lack of standard content and functional specifications for electronic tools to support MDRs within and across settings.

OBJECTIVE

To identify content and functional requirements for an MDR tool to support CoC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected discrete clinical data elements (CDEs) discussed during rounds for 128 acute and critical care patients. To capture CDEs, we developed and validated an iPad-based observational tool based on informatics CoC standards. We observed 19 days of rounds and conducted eight group and individual interviews. Descriptive and bivariate statistics and network visualization were conducted to understand associations between CDEs discussed during rounds with a particular focus on the POC. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed. All analyses were triangulated.

RESULTS

We identified the need for universal and configurable MDR tool views across settings and users and the provision of messaging capability. Eleven empirically derived universal CDEs were identified, including four POC CDEs: problems, plan, goals, and short-term concerns. Configurable POC CDEs were: rationale, tasks/'to dos', pending results and procedures, discharge planning, patient preferences, need for urgent review, prognosis, and advice/guidance.

DISCUSSION

Some requirements differed between settings; yet, there was overlap between POC CDEs.

CONCLUSIONS

We recommend an initial list of 11 universal CDEs for continuity in MDRs across settings and 27 CDEs that can be configured to meet setting-specific needs.

Human Factors in Critical Care Medical Environments

The purpose of this chapter on human factors in critical care medical environments is to provide a systematic review of the human factors and ergonomics contributions that led to significant improvements in patient safety over the last five decades. The review will focus on issues that contributed to patient injury and fatalities and how human factors and ergonomics can improve performance of providers in critical care. Given the complexity of critical care delivery, a review needs to cover a wide range of subjects. In this review, I take a sociotechnical systems perspective on critical care and discuss the people, their technical and nontechnical skills, the importance of teamwork, technology, and ergonomics in this complex environment. After a description of the importance of a safety climate, the chapter will conclude with a summary on how human factors and ergonomics can improve quality in critical care delivery.

Computerized provider documentation: findings and implications of a multisite study of clinicians and administrators

Objective

Clinical documentation is central to the medical record and so to a range of healthcare and business processes. As electronic health record adoption expands, computerized provider documentation (CPD) is increasingly the primary means of capturing clinical documentation. Previous CPD studies have focused on particular stakeholder groups and sites, often limiting their scope and conclusions. To address this, we studied multiple stakeholder groups from multiple sites across the USA.

Methods

We conducted 14 focus groups at five Department of Veterans Affairs facilities with 129 participants (54 physicians or practitioners, 34 nurses, and 37 administrators). Investigators qualitatively analyzed resultant transcripts, developed categories linked to the data, and identified emergent themes.

Results

Five major themes related to CPD emerged: communication and coordination; control and limitations in expressivity; information availability and reasoning support; workflow alteration and disruption; and trust and confidence concerns. The results highlight that documentation intertwines tightly with clinical and administrative workflow. Perceptions differed between the three stakeholder groups but remained consistent within groups across facilities.

Conclusions

CPD has dramatically changed documentation processes, impacting clinical understanding, decision-making, and communication across multiple groups. The need for easy and rapid, yet structured and constrained, documentation often conflicts with the need for highly reliable and retrievable information to support clinical reasoning and workflows. Current CPD systems, while better than paper overall, often do not meet the needs of users, partly because they are based on an outdated ‘paper-chart’ paradigm. These findings should inform those implementing CPD systems now and future plans for more effective CPD systems.

Improving interunit transitions of care between emergency physicians and hospital medicine physicians: a conceptual approach

Patient care transitions across specialties involve more complexity than those within the same specialty, yet the unique social and technical features remain underexplored. Further, little consensus exists among researchers and practitioners about strategies to improve interspecialty communication. This concept article addresses these gaps by focusing on the hand-off process between emergency and hospital medicine physicians. Sensitivity to cultural and operational differences and a common set of expectations pertaining to hand-off content will more effectively prepare the next provider to act safely and efficiently when caring for the patient. Through a consensus decision-making process of experienced and published authorities in health care transitions, including physicians in both specialties as well as in communication studies, the authors propose content and style principles clinicians may use to improve transition communication. With representation from both community and academic settings, similarities and differences between emergency medicine and internal medicine are highlighted to heighten appreciation of the values, attitudes, and goals of each specialty, particularly pertaining to communication. The authors also examine different communication media, social and cultural behaviors, and tools that practitioners use to share patient care information. Quality measures are proposed within the structure, process, and outcome framework for institutions seeking to evaluate and monitor improvement strategies in hand-off performance. Validation studies to determine if these suggested improvements in transition communication will result in improved patient outcomes will be necessary. By exploring the dynamics of transition communication between specialties and suggesting best practices, the authors hope to strengthen hand-off skills and contribute to improved continuity of care.

Perceptions of physician bedside handoff with nurse and family involvement

OBJECTIVE

Physician-to-physician handoffs have been identified as a high-risk area of patient care. Few data exist to support any specific handoff process as being superior. We developed a handoff process entitled physician bedside handoff (PBH), which is unique for allowing all stakeholders, including the parents of patients, to be involved in the handoff at the bedside. Our goal was to compare stakeholder perceptions of PBH with traditional physician handoff and to learn which factors stakeholders believe are important for improving handoffs in general.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 34 stakeholders (including attending physicians, residents, nurses, patient care attendants, patient parents, and medical students) participated in 1 of 3 group level assessments IGLAs), a participatory method in which valid data are generated regarding an issue of importance through an interactive and collaborative process.

RESULTS

In comparing PBH and traditional handoffs, participants uniformly perceived that both processes have value and that neither is superior in all cases; individual circumstances and parental preference should dictate which is used. Participation of all stakeholders was identified as being essential in improving handoffs in general. Other themes included that handoffs should occur in both verbal and written formats, and that providers and learners, specifcally medical students and residents, should be comfortable with both types of handoffs.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants identified that including all stakeholders is essential to improve handoffs, that PBH is not superior to traditional handoffs, and that both processes have value. Further research should be conducted to determine if including all stakeholders in the handoff process results in improved quality of care and safety.

In search of common ground in handoff documentation in an Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Handoff is an intra-disciplinary process, yet the flow of critical handoff information spans multiple disciplines. Understanding this information flow is important for the development of computer-based tools that supports the communication and coordination of patient care in a multi-disciplinary and highly specialized critical care setting. We aimed to understand the structure, functionality, and content of nurses' and physicians' handoff artifacts.

DESIGN

We analyzed 22 nurses' and physicians' handoff artifacts from a Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (CTICU) at a large urban medical center. We combined artifact analysis with semantic coding based on our published Interdisciplinary Handoff Information Coding (IHIC) framework for a novel two-step data analysis approach.

RESULTS

We found a high degree of structure and overlap in the content of nursing and physician artifacts. Our findings demonstrated a non-technical, yet sophisticated, system with a high degree of structure for the organization and communication of patient data that functions to coordinate the work of multiple disciplines in a highly specialized unit of patient care.

LIMITATIONS

This study took place in one CTICU. Further work is needed to determine the generalizability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the development of semi-structured patient-centered interdisciplinary handoff tools with discipline specific views customized for specialty settings may effectively support handoff communication and patient safety.

A tablet computer application for patients to participate in their hospital care

Building on our institution's commercial electronic health record and custom personal health record Web portal, we developed a tablet computer application to provide interactive information to hospital patients. Using Apple iPad devices, the prototype application was provided to five patients in a cardiology step-down unit. We conducted detailed interviews to assess patients' knowledge of their inpatient care, as well as their perceptions of the usefulness of the application. While patients exhibited varying levels of comfort with using the tablet computer, they were highly enthusiastic about the application's ability to supply health information such as their inpatient medication histories and photographs of their care providers. Additional research is warranted to assess the benefit such applications may have for addressing inpatient information needs, enhancing patient-provider communication and improving patient satisfaction.

An analysis and recommendations for multidisciplinary computerized handoff applications in hospitals

In healthcare, patient handoffs are a common practice that is implemented by most clinicians who carry the responsibility of patient care. Ineffective handoffs have been associated with the occurrence of adverse clinical events. With the inception of the Joint Commissions' National Patient Safety Goal (NSPG) 2E on handoff communication, computerized clinical handoff applications are emerging in hospitals. Computerized clinical handoff applications are intended to assist the clinicians in conducting effective handoffs by providing easy access to accurate clinical information and reducing the burden of handoff report upkeep. The purpose of this paper is to identify various types of computerized clinical handoff tools that are used in hospitals and perform a comparison of application characteristics, review clinical and business advantages and disadvantages in implementing computerized clinical handoff applications, and give recommendations for improvement.