Safety of rituximab in rheumatoid arthritis: A long-term prospective single-center study of gammaglobulin concentrations and infections

Incidence of severe infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking biological agents: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to estimate the population-based incidence of and determine the types of severe infection and deaths experienced by patients with rheumatoid arthritis taking biological agents.

INTRODUCTION

Since the late 1990s, various biological and synthetic drugs have been developed to treat rheumatoid arthritis. In recent years, the incidence of severe infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Western nations has been determined by observational studies; however, no systematic review has been conducted on this topic.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

The following inclusion criteria were considered: i) observational studies on patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with biological agents; ii) studies reporting the number of severe infections requiring hospitalization for treatment; iii) studies reporting person-years of observation data; and iv) studies based on rheumatoid arthritis registries, medical records from rheumatology centers, or insurance claim databases.

METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to identify published studies. The reference lists of all studies selected for critical appraisal were screened for additional studies. Unpublished studies were searched on MedNar and OpenGrey databases. All the searches were updated on December 6, 2021. After removing the duplicates, 2 independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria and then assessed full texts against the criteria. Two reviewers independently appraised the study and outcome levels for methodological quality using the critical appraisal instrument for cohort studies from JBI. Two reviewers extracted the relevant information related to severe infection and drugs.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies from 21 countries reported severe infection rates associated with using 9 biologic agents. In total, 18,428 infections with 395,065 person-years of biologic drug exposure were included in the analysis. Thirty-five studies included infections in outpatients receiving intravenous antibiotic therapy. Fifteen studies reported the first episode of infection, and the remaining studies did not specify either the first or all of the episodes of infection. Inclusion of viral infection and/or opportunistic infection varied among studies. Fifteen studies reported the site of infection, and respiratory, skin/soft tissue, urinary tract infection, and sepsis/bacteremia were commonly reported. Ten studies reported the case fatality rates, ranging from 2.5% to 22.2%. Meta-analysis was conducted for 7 biologic agents and conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The infection rate varied from 0.9 to 18.0/100 person-years. The meta-analysis revealed an infection rate of 4.2/100 person-years (95% CI 3.5-4.9) among patients receiving tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (heterogeneity 98.2%). The meta-analysis for the other 3 biologic agents revealed a point estimate of 5.5 to 8.7/100 person-years with high heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis indicated that registry-based studies were less likely to have very low or very high infection rates compared with other data sources. The definition of infection, the patient composition of the cohorts, and the type of databases appeared to be the primary sources of clinical and methodological heterogeneity.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO CRD42020175137.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to high statistical heterogeneity, the meta-analysis was not suited to estimating a summary measure of the infection rate. Developing standardized data collection is necessary to compare infection rates across studies.

Anti-viral efficacy of a next-generation CD4-binding site bNAb in SHIV-infected animals in the absence of anti-drug antibody responses

Broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) against HIV-1 are promising immunotherapeutic agents for treatment of HIV-1 infection. bNAbs can be administered to SHIV-infected rhesus macaques to assess their anti-viral efficacy; however, their delivery into macaques often leads to rapid formation of anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses limiting such assessment. Here, we depleted B cells in five SHIV-infected rhesus macaques by pretreatment with a depleting anti-CD20 antibody prior to bNAb infusions to reduce ADA. Peripheral B cells were depleted following anti-CD20 infusions and remained depleted for at least 9 weeks after the 1^st anti-CD20 infusion. Plasma viremia dropped by more than 100-fold in viremic animals after the initial bNAb treatment. No significant humoral ADA responses were detected for as long as B cells remained depleted. Our results indicate that transient B cell depletion successfully inhibited emergence of ADA and improved the assessment of anti-viral efficacy of a bNAb in a SHIV-infected rhesus macaque model.

•

Highly potent CD4bs bNAb reduces viremia up to 4 log₁₀ in SHIV-infected animals

•

Sustained B cell depletion prevents development of ADA responses

•

Lack of ADA enables multiple bNAb infusions over 12 weeks

Évaluation systématique de la réponse humorale contre le SARS-CoV-2 dans une cohorte française de 283 patients atteints d’un rhumatisme inflammatoire chronique☆

Objectifs

Estimer la séroprévalence de l’infection par le SARS-CoV-2 chez les patients atteints de rhumatisme inflammatoire chronique et préciser la proportion de formes asymptomatiques et symptomatiques de COVID-19.

Méthodes

Nous avons réalisé un dépistage systématique de l’infection à COVID-19 parmi les patients atteints de spondyloarthrite (SpA, n  = 143) et de polyarthrite rhumatoïde (PR, n  = 140) suivis en hôpital de jour de rhumatologie à l’hôpital Cochin à Paris entre juin et août 2020. Pour chaque patient, un test sérologique détectant les IgG dirigées contre la protéine nucléocapside N (anti-N) et, pour certains patients, contre la protéine Spike (anti-S) du SARS-CoV 2, était réalisé. Nous avons effectué une analyse descriptive des données.

Résultats

Durant la période de juin à août 2020, la séroprévalence (IgG anti-N) du SARS-CoV-2 dans notre population était de 2,83 % (8/283 patients) sans distinction entre les patients atteints de PR et de SpA (2,14 % et 3,5 % respectivement). Sur les 283 patients, 11 ont eu un diagnostic d’infection à SARS-CoV-2 (3,8 %). Parmi ces 11 patients, 2 patients ont fait une forme asymptomatique de COVID-19 (18 %) dont le diagnostic a été confirmé sur la positivité de la sérologie anti-S. Sur les 283 patients, 85 % étaient sous biothérapie, principalement sous Rituximab (RTX) (n  = 44) et Infliximab (IFX) (n  = 136).

Conclusion

La séroprévalence du SARS-CoV-2 chez les patients atteints de rhumatismes inflammatoires chroniques, principalement sous biothérapie, était de 2,83 %. Parmi les patients infectés, 18 % étaient asymptomatiques. La stratégie associant interrogatoire des patients et sérologie anti-N est performante pour dépister les infections à SARS-CoV-2.

Systematic assessment of the humoral response against SARS-CoV-2 in a French cohort of 283 patients with rheumatic diseases

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with rheumatic diseases and to specify the proportion of asymptomatic and symptomatic forms of COVID-19.

METHODS

We screened for SARS-CoV-2 infection among spondyloarthritis (SpA, n=143) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA, n=140) patients in our outpatient clinic at Cochin Hospital in Paris between June and August 2020. We performed a qualitative SARS-CoV-2 serological test which detects IgG directed against the N nucleocapsid protein (anti-N) and, for some patients, against the Spike protein (anti-S). Descriptive analyses were managed.

RESULTS

During June-August 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence rate in our population was 2.83% (8/283 patients) without significant difference between RA and SpA patients (2.14% and 3.5%, respectively). We report 11 out of 283 patients (3.8%) with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Among these 11 patients, 1 patient was asymptomatic (9%) with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 by anti-S serology. Of the 283 patients, 85% were under bDMARDs, mainly on rituximab (RTX) (n=44) and infliximab (IFX) (n=136).

CONCLUSIONS

The seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients with rheumatic diseases, mainly under bDMARDs treatments, was 2.83%. Among infected patients, 9% were asymptomatic. Detecting SARS-CoV-2 infections could be based on the strategy using patients' interview and anti-N serology.

Incidence and risk factors of rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia in patients with complicated nephrotic syndrome

BACKGROUND

Hypogammaglobulinemia is a major adverse event after rituximab treatment; however, the precise incidence and risk factors are unclear in complicated steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (SDNS/FRNS) patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study. Patients who received a single dose of rituximab for complicated SDNS or FRNS between February 2007 and May 2019 were enrolled. Serum IgG levels were plotted, and their trends were evaluated after rituximab treatment. The incidence of transient and persistent hypogammaglobulinemia was examined, and risk factors were calculated by multivariate analysis using logistic regression.

RESULTS

We enrolled 103 patients who received 238 single doses of rituximab. Hypogammaglobulinemia was observed in 58.4% of the patients at least once after a single dose of rituximab treatment and 22.3% developed persistent hypogammaglobulinemia. Serum IgG levels gradually increased during B-cell depletion, and patients with low serum IgG levels at rituximab treatment had persistent hypogammaglobulinemia. Repeated courses of rituximab treatment increased the incidence of hypogammaglobulinemia. A past history of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) (odds ratio [OR] = 10.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.65-37.81; P < 0.001) and low serum IgG levels at rituximab treatment (OR = 7.63; 95% CI = 2.10-27.71; P = 0.002) was significantly associated with hypogammaglobulinemia in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypogammaglobulinemia is a frequent adverse event after rituximab treatment, although IgG levels slightly increase during B-cell depletion. Low serum IgG levels at rituximab treatment and a past history of SRNS are significant risk factors for the development of hypogammaglobulinemia after rituximab treatment.

Hypogammaglobulinemia, infections and COVID-19 in people with multiple sclerosis treated with ocrelizumab

Objective

To determine the influence of immunoglobulins (Ig) level on the rate of infections in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with ocrelizumab.

Methods

We enrolled 109 consecutive pwMS treated with ocrelizumab with a mean follow-up of 2.69±0.56 (1.36-4.27) years. We have retrospectively searched our electronic database and the following information was collected: age, sex, MS characteristics, number of ocrelizumab cycles, infections, duration of the infection, hospitalization due to infection, treatment of the infection, and COVID-19 characteristics. Ig levels were measured within 14 days before each ocrelizumab infusion.

Results

Number of pwMS with values of IgM and IgG below lower level of normal at baseline was 3 (2.8%) and 2 (2.8%), respectively; and before 6^th cycle of ocrelizumab 5 (13.5%) and 5 (13.5%), respectively. Levels of IgM were steadily decreasing over time, while levels of IgG started to show statistically significant drop only after 5^th cycle of ocrelizumab. 58.7% pwMS experienced infection during treatment, with a median number of infections per pwMS being 1, range 0-4. Female sex increased the risk of any infection (HR 2.561, 95%CI 1.382-4.774, p=0.003). Higher age and smaller drop in IgM before 3^rd ocrelizumab cycle increased the risk for infection requiring hospitalization (HR 1.086, 95%CI 1.018-1.159, p=0.013 and HR 9.216, 95%CI 1.124-75.558, p=0.039, respectively). Longer disease duration increased the risk for COVID-19 (HR 1.075, 95%CI 1.002-1.154, p=0.045).

Conclusion

The present findings broaden limited real-world data on infection and COVID-19 risk in pwMS treated with ocrelizumab.

Immunogenicity of Rituximab biosimilar GP2013 in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders in daily clinical practice

OBJECTIVE

To study in daily practice the risk of immunogenicity of patients treated with the biosimilar rituximab (RTX) GP2013 used for chronic inflammatory rheumatic disorders.

METHODS

A prospective monocentric routine care study was carried out between September 2018 and May 2021, including consecutive patients treated with the biosimilar RTX GP2013. Biosamples were taken before each infusion to quantify anti-RTX antibodies (ADAbs) and serum RTX trough levels by ELISA (Lisa Tracker Duo Rituximab, LTR005, Theradiag).

RESULTS

168 GP2013-treated patients were included (129 who switched from originator RTX and 39 originator RTX naïve). The analysis of 602 samples identified 15 patients (8%) with positive ADAbs including 6 and 9 with transient and persistent ADAbs, respectively. The switch from originator RTX to GP2013 did not increase the risk of immunogenicity, with an incidence rate of 0.8 for 100 patient years. The frequency of persistent ADAs was higher in non-RA patients (5/56, 9% vs. 4/112, 3.5%). Patients with positive persistent ADAbs were more frequently non-caucasian (7/9, 78%, vs. 56/159, 35%, p<0.01) and all had detectable circulating B cells (vs. 40% in ADAb-negative patients, P<0.001). ADAb positivity was not associated with disease activity or RTX discontinuation but patients with ADAb titers >100 ng/mL experienced reduced treatment efficacy or severe infusion-related reaction.

CONCLUSION

Within the study duration, the immunogenicity of GP2013 is a rare event affecting the pharmacodynamics of RTX. Although development of ADAbs had no impact on treatment discontinuation, possible harmful consequences may be observed in patients with high antibody levels.

Rituximab for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a review

In the last decades, evidence suggesting the direct or indirect involvement of B cells on multiple sclerosis (MS) pathogenesis has accumulated. The increased amount of data on the efficacy and safety of B-cell-depleting therapies from several studies has suggested the addition of these drugs as treatment options to the current armamentarium of disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for MS. Particularly, rituximab (RTX), a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed at CD20 positive B lymphocytes resulting in cell-mediated apoptosis, has been demonstrated to reduce inflammatory activity, incidence of relapses and new brain lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Additional evidence also demonstrated that patients with progressive MS (PMS) may benefit from RTX, which also showed to be well tolerated, with acceptable safety risks and favorable cost-effectiveness profile.Despite these encouraging results, RTX is currently approved for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, several forms of vasculitis and rheumatoid arthritis, while it can only be administered off-label for MS treatment. Between Northern European countries exist different rules for using not licensed drug for treating MS. The Sweden MS register reports a high rate (53.5%) of off-label RTX prescriptions in relation to other annually started DMTs to treat MS patients, while Danish and Norwegian neurologists have to use other anti-CD20 drugs, as ocrelizumab, in most of the cases.In this paper, we review the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, safety profile and cost effectiveness aspects of RTX for the treatment of MS. Particularly, with the approval of new anti-CD20 DMTs, the recent worldwide COVID-19 emergency and the possible increased risk of infection with this class of drugs, this review sheds light on the use of RTX as an alternative treatment option for MS management, while commenting the gaps of knowledge regarding this drug.

Real word evidence on rituximab utilization: Combining administrative and hospital-pharmacy data

PURPOSE

To describe patterns of utilization, survival and infectious events in patients treated with rituximab at the University Hospital of Siena (UHS) to explore the feasibility of combining routinely collected administrative and hospital-pharmacy data for examining the real-world use of intravenous antineoplastic drugs.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal cohort study was conducted using data from the Hospital Pharmacy of Siena (HPS) and the Regional Administrative Database of Tuscany (RAD). Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 rituximab administration recorded between January 2012 and June 2016 were identified in the HPS database. Anonymized patient-level data were linked to RAD. Rituximab utilization during the first year of treatment was described using HPS. Hospital diagnoses of adverse infectious events that occurred during the first year of follow-up and four-year survival were observed using RAD.

RESULTS

A total of 311 new users of rituximab were identified: 264 patients received rituximab for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 47 were treated for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Among new users with one complete year of follow-up (n = 203) over 95% received rituximab as the first-line treatment, and approximately 70% of them received 5-8 doses. No patient in the CLL group received >8 administrations. Four-year survival was approximately 70% in both CLL and NHL patients. Sepsis was the most frequent infectious event observed (5.1%).

CONCLUSION

HPS and RAD provided complementary information on rituximab utilization, demonstrating their potential for future pharmacoepidemiological studies on antineoplastic medications administered in the Italian hospital setting. Overall, this general description of the real-world utilization of rituximab in patients treated for NHL and CLL at UHS was in line with treatment guidelines and current knowledge on the rituximab safety profile.

Secondary antibody deficiency in neurology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Induction of lymphocyte depletion is increasingly used as a therapeutic strategy for central and peripheral neuroinflammatory disease. However, there is also a growing recognition of the treatment-related complication of secondary antibody deficiency (SAD). Although the occurrence of hypogammaglobulinaemia is a recognized phenomenon during immunomodulation, robust data on the coexistence of impaired responses to immunization, and significant and/or atypical infections is scarce. Here we review the literature on SAD in anti-CD20 therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several factors that may increase the incidence of SAD have now been identified, including low levels of immunoglobulins prior to the commencement of B-cell ablation therapy, duration of maintenance therapy, and concurrent or prior use of other immunosuppressing agents such as cyclophosphamide and steroids. Measurement of disease-specific antibodies and vaccine response are likely to be helpful adjuncts to measurement of serum immunoglobulin levels during B-cell depleting therapy. Supportive treatment may include amending the treatment schedule to limit cumulative dose.

SUMMARY

B-cell depleting agents offer considerable therapeutic benefit in neurology. We propose modifications in current practice that include risk stratification and early identification of SAD, with the aim of minimising morbidity and mortality related to this underappreciated condition.

Rituximab treatment for multiple sclerosis

Rituximab, a chimeric anti-CD20-antibody, attracts increasing attention as a treatment option for multiple sclerosis (MS). Apart from smaller controlled trials, an increasing number of studies in real-world populations indicate high efficacy based on clinical and neuroradiological outcomes for rituximab in relapsing-remitting MS patients. Additional evidence also demonstrates efficacy of rituximab with treatment of progressive MS phenotypes. In this topical review, we summarize and discuss current evidence on mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety, tolerance and other clinical aspects of rituximab in the treatment of MS. Finally, we will highlight current knowledge gaps and the need for comparative studies with other disease-modifying therapies in MS.

THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RITUXIMAB BIOSIMILAR (ACELLBIA®) IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AS THE FIRST BIOLOGICAL AGENT: RESULTS OF PHASE III (ALTERRA) CLINICAL TRIAL

The Russian biotechnological company «BIOCAD» has designed a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 (BCD-020, Acellbia®) that is a biosimilar of rituximab (RTM; MabThera®, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Switzerland). In recent years, there has been evidence that RTM can be used at lower doses than those given in the standard recommendations and instructions for the use of this drug. This serves as the basis for the BCD-020-4/ALTERRA (ALTErnative Rituximab regimen in Rheumatoid Arthritis) trial, the objective of which was to investigate the efficiency and safety of using Acellbia® (at a dose of 600 mg twice at a 2-week interval) as the first biological agent (BA) for methotrexate (MTX)-resistant active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The investigation enrolled 159 patients aged 18 to 80 years with active RA. After 24 weeks 65.7 and 29.4% of patients achieved 20% improvement by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria in the Acellbia® + MTX and placebo (PL) + MTX groups, respectively (p<0.0001). The differences in the ACR20 response rate in the two groups were 36.3% (95% CI, 19.27–53.28%). There were significant differences between the groups in the ACR50 response rates: 28.4% and 5.9% (p=0.001) and in the ACR70 ones: 12.8% and only 2.0%, respectively (p=0.036). Analysis of all recorded adverse events (AE) frequency showed no significant differences between the patients in the study and control groups and demonstrates its equivalence with that of RTM (MabThera®); all the AE were expectable. It is noted that antibodies to RTM with binding and neutralizing activities had no impact on the efficiency and safety of therapy.

Risk of Tuberculosis Reactivation in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Non-Anti-TNF-Targeted Biologics

Tuberculosis (TB) still represents an important issue for public health in underdeveloped countries, but the use of antitumor necrosis factor agents (anti-TNF) for the treatment of inflammatory rheumatic disorders has reopened the problem also in countries with low TB incidence, due to the increased risk of TB reactivation in subjects with latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). Over the last 5 years, several non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics have been licensed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and psoriatic arthritis. We reviewed the epidemiology of TB, the role of different cytokines and of the immune system cells involved in the immune response against TB infection, the methods to detect LTBI, and the risk of TB reactivation in patients exposed to non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics. Given the limited role exerted by the cytokines different from TNF, as expected, data from controlled trials, national registries of biologics, and postmarketing surveillance show that the risk of TB reactivation in patients receiving non-anti-TNF-targeted biologics is negligible, hence raising the question whether the screening procedures for LTBI would be necessary.

Rituximab in autoimmune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: A success story

Despite a significant improvement of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) prognosis since the use of plasma exchange, morbidity and mortality remained significant because of poor response to standard treatment or exacerbations and relapses. Rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody directed against the B-lymphocyte CD20 antigen, has shown a particular interest in this indication. Recent studies also reported strong evidence for its efficiency in the prevention of relapses. This review addresses these recent progresses and still opened questions in this topic: should rituximab be proposed in all patients at the acute phase? Should all patients benefit from a preemptive treatment? Is the infectious risk acceptable in this context?

Biologics in dermatology: adverse effects

Biologics are a group of drugs that precisely affect certain specific steps in the immune response and are an extremely useful group when used in an appropriate setting. However, their use can often be a double-edged sword. Careful patient selection and thorough knowledge of adverse effects is a key to their successful use in various disorders. The initial enthusiasm has gradually given way to a more cautious approach wherein a balance is sought between clinical usefulness and expected side effects. The adverse effects of the biologics most commonly used in dermatology have been carefully listed for ready reference. The plausible causes of the adverse reactions are succinctly outlined along with their incriminating factor(s). Besides, in brief, the attention has been focused on their management. The content should provide an essential didactic content for educating the practitioner.

Rituximab-associated hypogammaglobulinemia: incidence, predictors and outcomes in patients with multi-system autoimmune disease

Rituximab is a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody used to treat lymphoma and autoimmune disease. Hypogammaglobulinemia has occurred after rituximab for lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis but data are scarce for other autoimmune indications. This study describes the incidence and severity of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving rituximab for small vessel vasculitis and other multi-system autoimmune diseases. Predictors for and clinical outcomes of hypogammaglobulinemia were explored. We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary referral specialist clinic. The severity of hypogammaglobulinemia was categorized by the nadir serum IgG concentration measured during clinical care. We identified 288 patients who received rituximab; 243 were eligible for inclusion with median follow up of 42 months. 26% were IgG hypogammaglobulinemic at the time that rituximab was initiated and 56% had IgG hypogammaglobulinemia during follow-up (5-6.9 g/L in 30%, 3-4.9 g/L in 22% and <3 g/L in 4%); IgM ≤0.3 g/L in 58%. The nadir IgG was non-sustained in 50% of cases with moderate/severe hypogammaglobulinemia. A weak association was noted between prior cyclophosphamide exposure and nadir IgG concentration, but not cumulative rituximab dose. IgG concentrations prior to and at the time of rituximab correlated with the nadir IgG post rituximab. IgG replacement was initiated because of recurrent infection in 12 (4.2%) patients and a lower IgG increased the odds ratio of receiving IgG replacement. Rituximab is associated with an increased risk of hypogammaglobulinemia but recovery of IgG level can occur. IgG monitoring may be useful for patients receiving rituximab.

Spanish Rheumatology Society and Hospital Pharmacy Society Consensus on recommendations for biologics optimization in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish guidelines for the optimization of biologic therapies for health professionals involved in the management of patients with RA, AS and PsA.

METHODS

Recommendations were established via consensus by a panel of experts in rheumatology and hospital pharmacy, based on analysis of available scientific evidence obtained from four systematic reviews and on the clinical experience of panellists. The Delphi method was used to evaluate these recommendations, both between panellists and among a wider group of rheumatologists.

RESULTS

Previous concepts concerning better management of RA, AS and PsA were reviewed and, more specifically, guidelines for the optimization of biologic therapies used to treat these diseases were formulated. Recommendations were made with the aim of establishing a plan for when and how to taper biologic treatment in patients with these diseases.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations established herein aim not only to provide advice on how to improve the risk:benefit ratio and efficiency of such treatments, but also to reduce variability in daily clinical practice in the use of biologic therapies for rheumatic diseases.

Clinical outcomes and safety of rituximab treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) - results from a nationwide cohort in Germany (GRAID)

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to evaluate the safety and clinical outcome of rituximab treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients refractory to standard of care therapy in a real-life setting in Germany.

METHODS

The GRAID registry included patients with different autoimmune diseases who were given off-label treatment with rituximab. Data on safety and clinical response were collected retrospectively. In SLE patients, clinical parameters included tender and swollen joint counts, fatigue, myalgia, general wellbeing, Raynaud's and the SLEDAI index. Laboratory tests included dsDNA antibody titres, complement factors, hematologic parameters and proteinuria. Finally, the investigators rated their patients as non-, partial or complete responders based on clinical grounds.

RESULTS

Data from 85 SLE patients were collected, 69 female and 16 male, with a mean disease duration of 9.8 years. The mean follow-up period was 9.6 ± 7.4 months, resulting in 66.8 patient years of observation. A complete response was reported in 37 patients (46.8%), partial response in 27 (34.2%), no response in 15 (19.0%). On average, major clinical as well as laboratory efficacy parameters improved substantially, with the SLEDAI decreasing significantly from 12.2 to 3.3 points. Concerning safety, one infusion reaction leading to discontinuation of treatment occurred. Infections were reported with a rate of 19.5 (including six severe infections) per 100 patient years.

CONCLUSION

With the restrictions of a retrospective data collection, the results of this study confirm data of other registries, which suggest a favourable benefit-risk ratio of rituximab in patients with treatment-refractory SLE.

Serum immunoglobulin levels and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinaemia during long-term maintenance therapy with rituximab in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis

OBJECTIVE

Rituximab (RTX) is a B cell depleting agent used to induce and maintain remission in patients with granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). As the development of hypogammaglobulinaemia in GPA patients on long-term RTX has not been addressed, the aim of this study was to investigate changes in immunoglobulin levels and risk factors for hypogammaglobulinaemia during long-term RTX maintenance therapy in GPA.

METHODS

We used a single-centre cohort study of 29 GPA patients who received a median total cumulative dose of CYC of 17 g and were treated with 2 g RTX followed by re-treatment with either 2 g once annually, 1 g biannually or a combination of both. Ig levels were measured before each RTX re-treatment and hypogammaglobulinaemia was defined as levels of total immunoglobulin <6 g/l.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 4 years, patients received a cumulative dose of 9 g RTX. While serum Ig levels decreased during RTX maintenance, the largest decrease occurred after the first infusion. Baseline Ig levels and the CYC cumulative dose predicted Ig levels, whereas the RTX cumulative dose did not. Eight patients (28%) discontinued RTX due to hypogammaglobulinaemia. Male gender [hazard ratio (HR) = 8.7, P = 0.044], kidney involvement (HR = 6.5, P = 0.083) and the 1 g biannual regimen (HR = 8.0, P = 0.024) increased the risk to discontinue RTX due to hypogammaglobulinaemia, whereas orbital-subglottic involvement (HR = 0.23, P = 0.080) decreased it.

CONCLUSION

Hypogammaglobulinaemia occurred in one-quarter of GPA patients during RTX maintenance, independent of the RTX cumulative dose. Male gender, kidney involvement and the 1 g biannual RTX regimen constitute risk factors for severe hypogammaglobulinaemia necessitating withdrawal of RTX.

Rituximab for induction and maintenance therapy in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's). Results of a single-center cohort study on 66 patients

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rituximab (RTX) associated with glucocorticoid treatment based on disease severity, as a remission induction treatment for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's) and to analyze the results of long-term maintenance therapy with low doses of RTX in a routine time-based protocol. This single-center retrospective study used standardized data collection from all GPA patients receiving RTX between 2002 and 2013. The remission induction regimen consisted of RTX and glucocorticoids, adapted according to disease severity. Once remission was achieved, patients received RTX maintenance treatment (500 mg every 6 months) for 18 months. Sixty-six GPA patients received RTX for remission induction. After six months, a response had been achieved in 78.8% of these patients, with a moderate oral prednisone regimen (mean dose at baseline, 32.8 ± 23.4 mg/day). Subglottic stenosis increased the risk of treatment failure (OR = 31.2, P = 0.0104). RTX maintenance treatment was continued for 18 months in 92% of the GPA patients, who were followed for 34.2 ± 26.2 months (mean total cumulative RTX dose of 4.6 ± 1.7 g). The relapse rate was 11.2/100 patient-years. The relapses occur a mean of 13.5 ± 14.7 months after the last RTX infusion. Twenty-one severe adverse events were recorded; 13.6% patients had severe infections. We conclude that in this single-center cohort, RTX associated with glucocorticoid treatment adapted for disease severity appeared to induce remission effectively in GPA patients. Maintenance treatment with low doses of RTX in a routine time-based protocol was safe and associated with low rates of relapse on treatment.

Low- versus high-dose rituximab for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

The approved dose of rituximab (RTX) for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is 2 × 1,000 mg infusions given 2 weeks apart. There is contradictory evidence regarding the effectiveness of a lower-dose regimen (2 × 500 mg) of RTX. Our aim was to compare the efficacy and safety of low- and high-dose RTX and to test the noninferiority of the low-dose regimen.

METHODS

A systematic literature review searching for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing low- and high-dose RTX for RA was conducted using the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The primary end points were the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20), ACR50, and ACR70 responses and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) at 24 and 48 weeks. The secondary end points were patient-reported outcomes (PROs; Health Assessment Questionnaire, Short Form 36, and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scores) and adverse events. Noninferiority of low-dose RTX was tested using different approaches, one of which was based on the fixed margin method.

RESULTS

In total, 6 RCTs and 2 cohort studies were identified. Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis of efficacy outcomes, which showed no significant differences in the primary outcomes between low- and high-dose RTX. Noninferiority criteria of low-dose RTX were met for the ACR20, ACR50, DAS28, and PROs (at 24 and 48 weeks). Serious adverse events did not differ significantly. The results of 2 additional RCTs and a meta-analysis of 2 cohort studies corroborated the results of the meta-analysis of RCTs.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose RTX has similar effectiveness and met noninferiority criteria for most primary outcomes. Considering the lower cost, it should be the standard RTX regimen for RA.

Challenges and approaches for the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics

Immunomodulatory biologics are a class of biotechnology-derived therapeutic products that are designed to engage immune-relevant targets and are indicated in the treatment and management of a range of diseases, including immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and malignancies.

Despite their high specificity and therapeutic advantages, immmunomodulatory biologics have been associated with adverse reactions such as serious infections, malignancies and cytokine release syndrome, which arise owing to the on-target or exaggerated pharmacological effects of these drugs. Immunogenicity resulting in the generation of antidrug antibodies is another unwanted effect that leads to loss of efficacy and — rarely — hypersensitivity reactions.

For some adverse reactions, mitigating and preventive strategies are in place, such as stratifying patients on the basis of responsiveness to therapy and the risk of developing adverse reactions. These strategies depend on the availability of robust biomarkers for therapeutic efficacy and the risk of adverse reactions: for example, seropositivity for John Cunningham virus is a risk factor for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The development of effective biomarkers will greatly aid these strategies.

The development and design of safer immunomodulatory biologics is reliant on a detailed understanding of the nature of the disease, target biology, the interaction of the target with the immunomodulatory biologic and the inherent properties of the biologic that elicit unwanted effects.

The availability of in vitro and in vivo models that can be used to predict adverse reactions associated with immunomodulatory biologics is central to the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics. Some progress has been made in developing in vitro and in silico tests for predicting cytokine release syndrome and immunogenicity, but there is still a lack of models for effectively predicting infections and malignancies.

Two pathways can be followed in designing and developing safer immunomodulatory biologics. The first pathway involves generating a biologic that engages an alternative target or mechanism to produce the desired pharmacodynamic effect without the associated adverse reaction, and is followed when the adverse reaction cannot be dissociated from the target biology. The second pathway involves redesigning the biologic to 'engineer out' components within the biologic structure that trigger adverse effects or to alter the nature of the target–biologic interactions.

Owing to their specificity, immunomodulatory biologics generally have better safety profiles than small-molecule drugs. However, adverse effects such as an increased risk of infections or cytokine release syndrome are of concern. Here, Park and colleagues discuss the current strategies used to predict and mitigate these adverse effects and consider how they can be used to inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Immunomodulatory biologics, which render their therapeutic effects by modulating or harnessing immune responses, have proven their therapeutic utility in several complex conditions including cancer and autoimmune diseases. However, unwanted adverse reactions — including serious infections, malignancy, cytokine release syndrome, anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity as well as immunogenicity — pose a challenge to the development of new (and safer) immunomodulatory biologics. In this article, we assess the safety issues associated with immunomodulatory biologics and discuss the current approaches for predicting and mitigating adverse reactions associated with their use. We also outline how these approaches can inform the development of safer immunomodulatory biologics.

Biologic therapy for autoimmune diseases: an update

Biologic therapies for rheumatologic diseases, which are targeted at molecules involved in the mechanisms of the immune system, provide an alternative to the existing treatment methods of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and other immunosuppressive medications. However, the current drawbacks of biologic therapies, including the inconvenience of intravenous administration, the high costs of these drugs, and the adverse events associated with them, prevent their wide use as first-line medications. This review provides an update of the recent literature on the new biologic therapies available. The review concentrates on nine drugs: tocilizumab, rituximab, ofatumumab, belimumab, epratuzumab, abatacept, golimumab, certolizumab, and sifalimumab, which are used as therapies for rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic sclerosis, or vasculitis.