1
|
Paolucci T, Pezzi L, Coraci D, Tognolo L, Pantalone A, Attanasi C, Graziani G, Dalla Costa D, Arippa F, Cichelli A, Monticone M. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, and Clinical Performances of the Shorter Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in a Sample of Italian People with Non-Specific Low Back Pain. J Pers Med 2024; 14:740. [PMID: 39063994 PMCID: PMC11277590 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2024] [Revised: 06/28/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluating the psychometric and clinical performances of the RM-18, the shorter version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ), in Italian people with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) as a time-saving and clinically useful method of assessing disability. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 74 people (52 females and 22 males, 53.03 ± 15.25 years old) with NSLBP. The RM-18, the RMQ, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and a pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) were administered. Psychometric testing included reliability by internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test-retest measurement (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC2.1), and concurrent validity by comparing the RM-18 with the RMQ and the ODI (Pearson's r correlation). Two separate regression analyses were performed to investigate the different impact of RM-18 and RMQ on NRS. RESULTS Cronbach's α of RM-18 was 0.92 and ICC (2,1) = 0.96. Strong correlations were found with the RMQ and the ODI (r = 0.98; r = 0.78, respectively). The regression models showed that the RM-18 and the RMQ similarly impacted the NRS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The RM-18 showed satisfactory psychometric testing and similarly impacted the NRS when compared to the RMQ. It can be recommended for clinical and research purposes in Italian people with NSLBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Paolucci
- Department of Oral, Medical and Biotechnological Sciences (DSMOB), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Study “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (T.P.); (A.C.)
| | - Letizia Pezzi
- Rehabilitation Unit, ASST Cremona-Ospedale di Cremona, Viale Concordia, 1, 26100 Cremona, Italy
| | - Daniele Coraci
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy; (D.C.); (L.T.)
| | - Lucrezia Tognolo
- Department of Neuroscience, Section of Rehabilitation, University of Padova, 35122 Padua, Italy; (D.C.); (L.T.)
| | - Andrea Pantalone
- Department of Medicine and Science of Aging, University “G. D’Annunzio”, 66100 Chieti, Italy;
| | | | - Giancarlo Graziani
- Dipartimento Specialita’ Mediche, Uoc Medicina Riabilitativa, Asl Roma 1, Borgo Santo Spirito, 3, 00193 Rome, Italy;
| | - Davide Dalla Costa
- Unit of Rehabilitation Medicine and Neurorehabilitation, Department of Neuroscience, ASST Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy;
| | - Federico Arippa
- Department of Mechanical, Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Cagliari, 09141 Cagliari, Italy;
| | - Alice Cichelli
- Department of Oral, Medical and Biotechnological Sciences (DSMOB), Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Study “G. D’Annunzio” of Chieti, 66100 Chieti, Italy; (T.P.); (A.C.)
| | - Marco Monticone
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari, 09124 Cagliari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chrobok L, Espejo T, Riedel HB, Kirchberger J, Overberg JA, Felber F, Perrot G, Nickel CH, Bingisser R. On-Site Physiotherapy in Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3149. [PMID: 38892860 PMCID: PMC11173222 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Revised: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: There is a high incidence of nonspecific Low Back Pain (LBP) in patients visiting Emergency Departments (EDs), but there is a lack of knowledge regarding emergency physiotherapy for LBP. The effect of on-site physiotherapy in these patients was therefore never demonstrated. We assessed short-term outcomes, feasibility and patient satisfaction with physiotherapy in ED patients presenting with nonspecific LBP. Methods: A block-randomized, controlled, open-label trial with a follow-up of 42 days. Patients aged 18 years or older presenting to an ED with nonspecific LBP were prospectively enrolled. Both groups received the same booklet with written information on LBP management and exercises. Patients in the intervention group were given additional instructions by a certified physiotherapist. Results: We included 86 patients in the primary analysis. The median age was 40, and 40.7% were female. At day 7, the median Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was 2 points lower in the intervention group compared to the control group, which was not statistically significant. There was no between-group difference in pain at day 7. Patients who received physiotherapy felt significantly more confident with the exercises they were taught (p = 0.004, effect size = 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.5]). Conclusions: On-site physiotherapy in ED patients presenting with nonspecific low back pain is associated with higher patient satisfaction, compared to standard of care. The effect of physiotherapy was small, with only minimal improvement in disability, but without a reduction in pain. Despite the very small effect size, physiotherapeutic interventions should be investigated in larger cohorts with an extended intervention including patient education, exercises, and other physiotherapeutic modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leon Chrobok
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| | - Tanguy Espejo
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| | - Henk B. Riedel
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| | - Joris Kirchberger
- Department of Therapies, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.K.); (J.-A.O.); (G.P.)
| | - Jan-Arie Overberg
- Department of Therapies, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.K.); (J.-A.O.); (G.P.)
| | - Florina Felber
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| | - Guido Perrot
- Department of Therapies, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (J.K.); (J.-A.O.); (G.P.)
| | - Christian H. Nickel
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| | - Roland Bingisser
- Emergency Department, University Hospital, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (T.E.); (H.B.R.); (F.F.); (C.H.N.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Q, Wang Z, Chen X, Du J, Zhang S. Efficacy of neuromobilization in the treatment of low back pain: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302930. [PMID: 38713706 PMCID: PMC11075829 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability. Neuromobilization (NM) as a physical therapy technique, offers some degree of symptom improvement. However, some studies have shown that NM can significantly reduce the symptoms of LBP, while others have failed to find similar positive effects. OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of NM for LBP. DATA SOURCES A literature search was conducted across five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Web of Science) from their inception to December 2023. Study main measures assessed pain, disability, and straight leg raise angle to determine the degree of improvement in patients. RESULTS Seven randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis. The findings indicated that NM interventions in patients with LBP were more effective than control groups in improving Visual Analog Scale scores (mean difference = 0.62, 95% CI (0.03, 1.21)) and Oswestry Disability Index scores (mean difference = 7.54, 95% CI (4.98, 10.10)). There was no significant difference in straight leg raise results (mean difference = 0.18, 95% CI (-0.08, 0.44)). CONCLUSIONS NM demonstrated effectiveness in improving Visual Analog Scale and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in patients with LBP, but straight leg raise outcomes are still uncertain and until more high-quality studies are included, the effectiveness of NM for SLR remains unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quanzheng Chen
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| | - Zhenshan Wang
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| | - Xian Chen
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| | - Jinchao Du
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
| | - Shuna Zhang
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor AH. Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:344. [PMID: 38693474 PMCID: PMC11061926 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a significant health problem worldwide, with a lifetime prevalence of 84% in the general adult population. To rationalise the management of LBP, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been issued in various countries around the world. This study aims to identify and compare the recommendations of recent CPGs for the management of LBP across the world. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro, and major guideline databases were searched from 2017 to 2022 to identify CPGs. CPGs focusing on information regarding the management and/or treatment of non-specific LBP were considered eligible. The quality of included guidelines was evaluated using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. RESULTS Our analysis identified a total of 22 CPGs that met the inclusion criteria, and were of middle and high methodological quality as assessed by the AGREE II tool. The guidelines exhibited heterogeneity in their recommendations, particularly in the approach to different stages of LBP. For acute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For subacute LBP, the guidelines recommended the use of NSAIDs, therapeutic exercise, staying active, and spinal manipulation. For chronic LBP, the guidelines recommended therapeutic exercise, the use of NSAIDs, spinal manipulation, and acupuncture. CONCLUSIONS Current CPGs provide recommendations for almost all major aspects of the management of LBP, but there is marked heterogeneity between them. Some recommendations lack clarity and overlap with other treatments within the guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Zhou
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK.
| | - David Salman
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, W6 8RP, UK
| | - Alison H McGregor
- MSk lab, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, 2nd Floor, Sir Michael Uren Hub, 86 Wood Lane, W12 0BZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kechichian A, Pommier D, Druart L, Lowry V, Pinsault N, Desmeules F. "Cooperation between physicians and physios fosters trust you know": a qualitative study exploring patients' experience with first-contact physiotherapy for low back pain in French primary care. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:69. [PMID: 38395795 PMCID: PMC10885482 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02302-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiotherapists working in collaboration with family physicians in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare clinics are now able to manage acute low back pain patients as first-contact practitioners in advanced practice roles. This includes medical act delegation such as making a medical diagnosis and prescribing medication. The aim of this study is to explore patients' experience and perceptions when attending a first-contact physiotherapist (FCP) in an advanced practice collaborative primary care model for acute low back pain (LBP). METHODS A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted. Patients that consulted a FCP for acute LBP care in new collaborative model were included. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and inductive thematic analysis was performed to generate themes related to patients' experience and perceptions. RESULTS Ten patients were interviewed (3 women, 7 men; mean age 36.5 ± 9.63 years). All LBP participants experienced important level of pain and disability. Four overarching themes related to patients' experience with the new FCP model were formalized: 1) "Going to see a physiotherapist who specializes in painful movements, well that makes sense to me", 2) "Physiotherapist offered to give me exercises to do at home to relieve the back pain", 3) "I went there feeling confident", 4) "The physiotherapist can do more than just send you to see more appropriate people". Participants highlighted the need to receive timely and high-quality care and were receptive with being autonomously managed by a FCP. Overall, patients' experiences with FCP model of care were positive. Participants were highly confident in the FCP's ability to perform delegated medical tasks including making a medical diagnosis and prescribing oral medication such as analgesic drugs. Patients felt that a greater expansion of FCPs' scope of practice was needed to improve the model. CONCLUSION Findings from this study can inform the implementation of FCP in countries where patients are not typically granted FCP by underlining that patients are favourable towards the advance practice model as such models support timely and high-quality care. Further research is needed to better determine the future advance practice physiotherapists' scope of practice in French primary and secondary care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Kechichian
- University Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France.
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Grenoble-Alpes, 175 Avenue Centrale, Saint-Martin d'Hères, Grenoble, 38400, France.
| | - Dylan Pommier
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Grenoble-Alpes, 175 Avenue Centrale, Saint-Martin d'Hères, Grenoble, 38400, France
| | - Léo Druart
- University Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Grenoble-Alpes, 175 Avenue Centrale, Saint-Martin d'Hères, Grenoble, 38400, France
| | - Véronique Lowry
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicolas Pinsault
- University Grenoble-Alpes, CNRS, UMR 5525, VetAgro Sup, Grenoble INP, TIMC, Grenoble, France
- Department of Physiotherapy, University Grenoble-Alpes, 175 Avenue Centrale, Saint-Martin d'Hères, Grenoble, 38400, France
| | - François Desmeules
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Villalba-Meneses F, Guevara C, Velásquez-López PA, Arias-Serrano I, Guerrero-Ligña SA, Valencia-Cevallos CM, Almeida-Galárraga D, Cadena-Morejón C, Marín J, Marín JJ. BackMov: Individualized Motion Capture-Based Test to Assess Low Back Pain Mobility Recovery after Treatment. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:913. [PMID: 38339630 PMCID: PMC10857203 DOI: 10.3390/s24030913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a common issue that negatively affects a person's quality of life and imposes substantial healthcare expenses. In this study, we introduce the (Back-pain Movement) BackMov test, using inertial motion capture (MoCap) to assess lumbar movement changes in LBP patients. The test includes flexion-extension, rotation, and lateralization movements focused on the lumbar spine. To validate its reproducibility, we conducted a test-retest involving 37 healthy volunteers, yielding results to build a minimal detectable change (MDC) graph map that would allow us to see if changes in certain variables of LBP patients are significant in relation to their recovery. Subsequently, we evaluated its applicability by having 30 LBP patients perform the movement's test before and after treatment (15 received deep oscillation therapy; 15 underwent conventional therapy) and compared the outcomes with a specialist's evaluations. The test-retest results demonstrated high reproducibility, especially in variables such as range of motion, flexion and extension ranges, as well as velocities of lumbar movements, which stand as the more important variables that are correlated with LBP disability, thus changes in them may be important for patient recovery. Among the 30 patients, the specialist's evaluations were confirmed using a low-back-specific Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Functioning scale, and agreement was observed, in which all patients improved their well-being after both treatments. The results from the specialist analysis coincided with changes exceeding MDC values in the expected variables. In conclusion, the BackMov test offers sensitive variables for tracking mobility recovery from LBP, enabling objective assessments of improvement. This test has the potential to enhance decision-making and personalized patient monitoring in LBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Villalba-Meneses
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Cesar Guevara
- Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos—MIST, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Quito 170103, Ecuador;
| | - Paolo A. Velásquez-López
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Isaac Arias-Serrano
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Stephanie A. Guerrero-Ligña
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Camila M. Valencia-Cevallos
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Diego Almeida-Galárraga
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Carolina Cadena-Morejón
- School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador;
| | - Javier Marín
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José J. Marín
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bejarano G, Vining R, Desai DP, Minchew J, Michael Guo H, Goertz C. Development of a low back pain care pathway in an academic hospital system: results of a consensus process. J Orthop Surg Res 2024; 19:11. [PMID: 38169412 PMCID: PMC10763186 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04492-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide and a significant component of healthcare expenditures. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been highlighted as a key resource to improve the quality of care. This study aimed to develop a clinical pathway for LBP based on CPGs in an academic health system. METHODS We conducted a modified Delphi study of clinicians caring for patients with LBP who were asked to rate 21 CPG-informed seed statements through an online survey. The goal was to identify statements that achieved a minimum of 80% consensus among panelists. RESULTS Thirty-five healthcare providers participated as panelists. The majority of participants were male (68.6%), had MD or DO (62.9%) degrees, and were clinicians (73.8%) working in neurosurgery (36.1%), orthopedics (25.7%), emergency medicine (14.3%), or physical therapy (11.4%). Initially, consensus was reached on 20 of 21 seed statements. One statement did not reach consensus in the initial round and was revised into two separate statements based on feedback from panelists. One of these statements achieved consensus in the second review round. All statements reaching consensus were incorporated into a care pathway consisting of diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment for LBP. CONCLUSION Healthcare providers across various disciplines supported statements interpreting current CPGs related to care for LBP. This study represents a step toward supporting guideline-concordant care for LBP. Additional research is needed to assess how such pathways impact actual clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Devan P Desai
- Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Office 441, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Joe Minchew
- Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Office 441, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - H Michael Guo
- Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Office 441, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Christine Goertz
- Duke University, 300 W. Morgan Street, Office 441, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Archer L, Snell KIE, Stynes S, Axén I, Dunn KM, Foster NE, Wynne-Jones G, van der Windt DA, Hill JC. Development and External Validation of Individualized Prediction Models for Pain Intensity Outcomes in Patients With Neck Pain, Low Back Pain, or Both in Primary Care Settings. Phys Ther 2023; 103:pzad128. [PMID: 37756617 PMCID: PMC10682973 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to develop and externally validate multivariable prediction models for future pain intensity outcomes to inform targeted interventions for patients with neck or low back pain in primary care settings. METHODS Model development data were obtained from a group of 679 adults with neck or low back pain who consulted a participating United Kingdom general practice. Predictors included self-report items regarding pain severity and impact from the STarT MSK Tool. Pain intensity at 2 and 6 months was modeled separately for continuous and dichotomized outcomes using linear and logistic regression, respectively. External validation of all models was conducted in a separate group of 586 patients recruited from a similar population with patients' predictor information collected both at point of consultation and 2 to 4 weeks later using self-report questionnaires. Calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed separately using STarT MSK Tool data from both time points to assess differences in predictive performance. RESULTS Pain intensity and patients reporting their condition would last a long time contributed most to predictions of future pain intensity conditional on other variables. On external validation, models were reasonably well calibrated on average when using tool measurements taken 2 to 4 weeks after consultation (calibration slope = 0.848 [95% CI = 0.767 to 0.928] for 2-month pain intensity score), but performance was poor using point-of-consultation tool data (calibration slope for 2-month pain intensity score of 0.650 [95% CI = 0.549 to 0.750]). CONCLUSION Model predictive accuracy was good when predictors were measured 2 to 4 weeks after primary care consultation, but poor when measured at the point of consultation. Future research will explore whether additional, nonmodifiable predictors improve point-of-consultation predictive performance. IMPACT External validation demonstrated that these individualized prediction models were not sufficiently accurate to recommend their use in clinical practice. Further research is required to improve performance through inclusion of additional nonmodifiable risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Archer
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, UK
| | - Kym I E Snell
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, UK
| | - Siobhán Stynes
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
- Midlands Partnership Foundation NHS Trust, North Staffordshire Musculoskeletal Interface Service, Haywood Hospital, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Iben Axén
- Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research for Worker Health, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 13, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kate M Dunn
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
- Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service (STARS) Education and Research Alliance, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Queensland, Australia
| | | | | | - Jonathan C Hill
- School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dobija L, Pereira B, Cohen-Aknine G, Roren A, Dupeyron A, Coudeyre E. Immediate effect of passive hamstring stretching on flexibility and relationship with psychosocial factors in people with chronic low back pain. Heliyon 2023; 9:e19753. [PMID: 37810115 PMCID: PMC10559058 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hamstring muscle tightness contributes to disability in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). HM stretching improves flexibility in healthy individuals, but the immediate effect of stretching is unknown in people with CLBP. Moreover, the stretching effect could be influenced by psychosocial factors. Objectives To evaluate the immediate effect of passive HM stretching on flexibility in people with CLBP and the relationships between psychosocial factors and change in hamstring flexibility. Design Non-randomized, pilot trial. Method One minute of passive stretching was performed in 90 people with CLBP. Change in Active Knee Extension and Straight Leg Raise angles (digital inclinometer), and Fingertips-to-Floor distance (measuring tape) were measured before and immediately after stretching. Correlations between change in flexibility and baseline Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores were analyzed. Results Hamstring flexibility improved significantly after stretching; Active Knee Extension mean difference was 4° (95% CI, 2.4 to 5.1; p < 0.001, right ES = 0.24, left ES = 0.23); Straight Leg Raise mean difference was 7° (95% CI, 5.5 to 8.6, p < 0.001, right ES = 0.44, left ES = 0.42), Fingertips-to-Floor mean difference was 2 cm (95% CI, 1.7 to 3.0, p < 0.001, ES = 0.20). No correlation was found between improvement in any of the hamstring flexibility measurements and FABQ or HADS scores (p > 0.05). Conclusions Passive hamstring stretching induced an immediate, statistically significantly improvement in hamstring flexibility, but only the change in Straight Leg Raise amplitude was clinically important. Psychosocial factors were not related to improvements in flexibility after hamstring stretching.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lech Dobija
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Unité de Nutrition Humaine, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Direction de la Recherche Clinique et de l’Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont-Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Gabriel Cohen-Aknine
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Alexandra Roren
- Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l'Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Centre-Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Dupeyron
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nîmes, 30900 Nîmes, France
| | - Emmanuel Coudeyre
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Clermont Ferrand, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Unité de Nutrition Humaine, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, 63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sun D, Liu YY, Luo D, Wu YQ, Yan ZQ, Liang YQ, Huang XY, Lin JL, Luo HS, Wang R. A multidimensional nomogram combining clinical factors and imaging features to predict 1-year recurrence of low back pain with or without radicular pain after spinal manipulation/mobilization. Chiropr Man Therap 2023; 31:27. [PMID: 37563732 PMCID: PMC10416529 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-023-00500-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this retrospective study, we aimed to develop a nomogram to predict recurrence during a 1-year period of spinal manipulation/mobilization (SM/M) in patients with low back pain (LBP) with greater pain intensity, more severe comorbid conditions, or a neuropathic component. METHODS A total of 786 consecutive patients with LBP treated with SM/M as primary therapy were divided into training (n = 545) and validation (n = 241) sets. Cox regression analyses were used to assess the relative value of clinical factors and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging features associated with recurrence during the 1-year period. Predictors of recurrence with significant differences were used to construct a nomogram in the training set. We evaluated the performance of the model on the training and validation sets to determine its discriminative ability, calibration, and clinical utility. The prognostic value of the nomogram for predicting recurrence was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analyses. RESULTS A nomogram comprising hospitalization time, previous history of LBP, disease duration, lumbar range of motion, lower extremity tendon reflex, muscle strength, ratio of herniation to uncompressed dural sac area, and Pfirrmann classification was established for recurrence during a 1-year period after SM/M in patients with LBP. Favorable calibration and discrimination were observed in the nomogram training and validation sets (C-index 0.753 and 0.779, respectively). Decision curve analysis confirmed the clinical utility of the nomogram. Over a 1-year period, the nomogram showed satisfactory performance in predicting recurrence in LBP after SM/M. CONCLUSION We established and validated a novel nomogram that can accurately predict a patient's risk of LBP recurrence following SM/M. This realistic prognostic model may aid doctors and therapists in their decision-making process and strategy optimization for non-surgical treatment of LBP using SM/M.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dai Sun
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yang-Yang Liu
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dan Luo
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Ye-Qi Wu
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhi-Qiang Yan
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yun-Qi Liang
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xue-Yan Huang
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jia-Long Lin
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hua-Song Luo
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Massage, Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ramond-Roquin A, Bègue C, Vizzini J, Chhor S, Bouchez T, Parot-Schinkel E, Loiez A, Petit A, Ghali M, Peurois M, Bouton C. Effectiveness of coordinated care to reduce the risk of prolonged disability among patients suffering from subacute or recurrent acute low back pain in primary care: protocol of the CO.LOMB cluster-randomized, controlled study. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1156482. [PMID: 37409270 PMCID: PMC10318135 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1156482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal condition and, globally, a leading cause of years lived with disability. It leads to reduced social participation, impaired quality of life, and direct and indirect costs due to work incapacity. A coordinated approach focusing on psychosocial risk factors, active reeducation, and the early use of tools to maintain employment, may be effective for improving prognosis of patients with LBP. Primary care professionals and multidisciplinary teams, who see patients in the early stages of LBP may be in the best position to implement such a coordinated approach. We designed this study to assess a coordinated multi-faceted strategy in primary care for patients with subacute or recurrent acute LBP. Methods The CO.LOMB study was designed as a multicentric, cluster-randomized, controlled study. Patients aged 18-60 years, with subacute or recurrent acute LBP are eligible. Patients also need to be employed (but can be on sick leave) with access to occupational health services. The clusters of GPs will be randomized (1:1) to either the Coordinated-care group or the Usual-care group. Patients will be assigned the group allocated to their GP. The healthcare professionals (GPs and associated physiotherapists) allocated to the Coordinated-care group will perform a 2-session study training. The following interventions are planned in the Coordinated-care group: exploration and management of psychosocial factors, active reeducation with a physiotherapist, the implementing of tools to maintain employment, and a reinforced cooperation between primary healthcare professionals. The primary objective is to assess the benefit of coordinated primary care to reduce disability in LBP patients at 12 months after enrollment: measure using the validated French version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of pain, work status, and quality of life at various time points. The study plans to enroll 500 patients in 20 GP clusters. Patients will be followed up for 12months. Discussion This study will evaluate the benefit of a coordinated multi-faceted strategy in primary care for patients with LBP. Notably whether this approach will alleviate the associated disability, attenuate pain, and promote the maintenance or return to work. Clinical Trial Registration NCT04826757.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Ramond-Roquin
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
- Département de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine d’Urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Cyril Bègue
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
| | - Jonathan Vizzini
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
| | - Sidonie Chhor
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Tiphanie Bouchez
- Département d'Enseignement et de Recherche en Médecine Générale, RETINES, HEALTHY, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Elsa Parot-Schinkel
- Biostatistics and Methodology Department, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Anthéa Loiez
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
- Delegation for Clinical Research and Innovation, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Audrey Petit
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
| | - Maria Ghali
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
| | - Matthieu Peurois
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Angers, Angers, France
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
| | - Céline Bouton
- Univ Angers, Univ Rennes, EHESP, Inserm, IRSET-ESTER, Angers, France
- Département de Médecine Générale, Univ Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Migliorini F, Vaishya R, Pappalardo G, Schneider M, Bell A, Maffulli N. Between guidelines and clinical trials: evidence-based advice on the pharmacological management of non-specific chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:432. [PMID: 37254090 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06537-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The pharmacological management of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP) aims to restore patients' daily activities and improve their quality of life. The management of NCLBP is not well codified and extremely heterogeneous, and residual symptoms are common. Pharmacological management should be considered as co-adjuvant to non-pharmacological therapy, and should be guided by the symptoms reported by the patients. Depending on the individual severity of NCLPB, pharmacological management may range from nonopioid to opioid analgesics. It is important to identify patients with generalized sensory hypersensitivity, who may benefit from dedicated therapy. This article provides an evidence-based overview of the principles of pharmacological management of NCLPB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Orthopaedic, Trauma, and Reconstructive Surgery, RWTH University Hospital of Aachen, 52064, Aachen, Germany.
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Bolzano, 39100, Italy.
| | - Raju Vaishya
- Department of Orthopedics, Indraprastha Apollo Hospitals Institutes of Orthopaedics, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Marco Schneider
- Department of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Witten/Herdecke, 58455, Witten, Germany
- Department of Arthroscopy and Joint Replacement, MVZ Praxisklinik Orthopädie Aachen, RWTH University Hospital Aachen, 52074, Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Bell
- Department of Orthopedics, Eifelklinik St. Brigida, Simmerath, Germany
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, Baronissi, 84081, Italy
- Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Hospital, London, E1 4DG, England
- School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Stoke on Trent, Keele University Faculty of Medicine, Keele, England
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review of Recent International Guidelines for Diagnosis and Conservative Treatment. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041685. [PMID: 36836220 PMCID: PMC9964474 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic low back pain (cLBP) is a public and occupational health problem that is a major professional, economic and social burden. We aimed to provide a critical overview of current international recommendations regarding the management of non-specific cLBP. We conducted a narrative review of international guidelines for the diagnosis and conservative treatment of people with non-specific cLBP. Our literature search yielded five reviews of guidelines published between 2018 and 2021. In these five reviews, we identified eight international guidelines that fulfilled our selection criteria. We added the 2021 French guidelines into our analysis. Regarding diagnosis, most international guidelines recommend searching for so-called yellow, blue and black flags, in order to stratify the risk of chronicity and/or persistent disability. The relevance of clinical examination and imaging are under debate. Regarding management, most international guidelines recommend non-pharmacological treatments, including exercise therapy, physical activity, physiotherapy and education; however, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, in selected cases, is the core treatment recommended for people with non-specific cLBP. Oral, topical or injected pharmacological treatments are under debate, and may be offered to selected and well-phenotyped patients. The diagnosis of people with cLBP may lack precision. All guidelines recommend multimodal management. In clinical practice, the management of individuals with non-specific cLBP should combine non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments. Future research should focus on improving tailorization.
Collapse
|
14
|
A national media mass campaign improves beliefs and behaviours about low back pain in the general population and in general practitioners. Joint Bone Spine 2023; 90:105536. [PMID: 36708758 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Previous international mass-media campaigns for low back pain (LBP) have had conflicting impacts on the general population. The objective was to evaluate the impact of a national back pain campaign conducted between 2017 and 2019 on beliefs and behaviours of general practitioners and the general population in France. METHODS Between 2017 and 2019, a mass-media campaign was used to disseminate positive messages about LBP using several media, along with a parallel campaign addressed to general practitioners. An email survey before the campaign and 6 and 18 months after the campaign started evaluated beliefs and behaviours among a representative sample of the 2 target populations (3500 people from the general population and 700 general practitioners before the campaign, and 2000 people and 300 general practitioners 6 and 18 months after). RESULTS Overall, 56% of the general population respondents before the campaign and 74% and 75% at 6 and 18 months after adhered to the statement "One should maintain physical activity" when dealing with LBP. Conversely, the percentage adhering to the statement "The best treatment is resting" decreased significantly from 68% before the campaign to 45% at 6 and 18 months after. Physicians reported delivering more reassurance and giving more documentation to patients after the campaign. They prescribed less sick leave during the first consultation (65% before the campaign, 46% and 30% at 6 and 18 months after). CONCLUSION A mass-media campaign aimed at the public and general practitioners in France significantly modified beliefs and behaviours about LBP.
Collapse
|
15
|
Reed WR, Lima CR, Liebschner MAK, Hurt CP, Li P, Gudavalli MR. Measurement of Force and Intramuscular Pressure Changes Related to Thrust Spinal Manipulation in an In Vivo Animal Model. BIOLOGY 2022; 12:biology12010062. [PMID: 36671758 PMCID: PMC9855381 DOI: 10.3390/biology12010062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Current knowledge regarding biomechanical in vivo deep tissue measures related to spinal manipulation remain somewhat limited. More in vivo animal studies are needed to better understand the effects viscoelastic tissue properties (i.e., dampening) have on applied spinal manipulation forces. This new knowledge may eventually help to determine whether positive clinical outcomes are associated with particular force thresholds reaching superficial and/or deep spinal tissues. A computer-controlled feedback motor and a modified Activator V device with a dynamic load cell attached were used to deliver thrust spinal manipulations at various magnitudes to the L7 spinous process in deeply anesthetized animals. Miniature pressure catheters (Millar SPR-1000) were inserted unilaterally into superficial and deep multifidi muscles. Measurements of applied mechanical forces and superficial/deep multifidi intramuscular pressure changes were recorded during spinal manipulations delivered in vivo. Manipulative forces and net changes in intramuscular pressures reaching deep spinal tissues are greatly diminished by viscoelastic properties of in vivo tissues, which could have possible clinical safety and/or mechanistic implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R. Reed
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Carla R. Lima
- Rehabilitation Sciences Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | | | - Christopher P. Hurt
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Peng Li
- School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Maruti R. Gudavalli
- College of Chiropractic Medicine, Keiser University, West Palm Beach, FL 33411, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Saunders B, Chudyk A, Protheroe J, Cooper V, Bartlam B, Birkinshaw H, Foster NE, Hill JC. Risk-based stratified primary care for common musculoskeletal pain presentations: qualitative findings from the STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:326. [PMID: 36522640 PMCID: PMC9754991 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01924-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The STarT MSK cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of risk-based stratified primary care versus usual care for patients with back, neck, shoulder, knee or multi-site pain. Trial quantitative results showed risk-based stratified care was not superior to usual care for patients' clinical outcomes, but the intervention led to some changes in GP clinical decision-making. This paper reports a linked qualitative study exploring how risk-based stratified care was perceived and used in the trial, from the perspectives of clinicians and patients. METHODS Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 patients, and focus groups and interviews with 20 clinicians (GPs and physiotherapists) in the intervention arm of the trial. Data were analysed thematically and findings explored using Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) and the COM-B model. MAIN FINDINGS Risk-based stratified care (subgrouping and matching treatments) was found to have 'coherence' (i.e. made sense) to several clinicians and patients, in that it was well-integrated in practice, and supported clinical decision-making. However, for some GPs stratified care was less 'meaningful', as the risk-stratification tool did not fit with usual ways of consulting and added to already time-pressured consultations. GPs reported giving more patients written information/advice due to easier access to electronic information leaflets through the trial template and were motivated to refer patients to physiotherapy as they believed the trial resulted in faster physiotherapy access (although this was not the case). Patients and clinicians reported that risk-based stratified care influenced conversations in the consultation, prompting greater attention to psychosocial factors, and facilitating negotiation of treatment options. Physiotherapists saw benefits in receiving information about patients' risk subgroup on referral forms. CONCLUSION These findings provide context for interpreting some of the trial outcomes, particularly in relation to changes in clinical decision-making when risk-based stratified care was used. Findings also indicate potential reasons for lack of GP engagement with risk-based stratified care. Positive outcomes were identified that were not captured in the quantitative data, specifically that risk-based stratified care positively influenced some GP-patient conversations and facilitated negotiation of treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN15366334 (26/04/2016).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Saunders
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Adrian Chudyk
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Joanne Protheroe
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Vincent Cooper
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Bernadette Bartlam
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| | - Hollie Birkinshaw
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences (FELS), University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nadine E Foster
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK ,grid.1003.20000 0000 9320 7537STARS Research and Education Alliance, Surgical Treatment and Rehabilitation Service, The University of Queensland and Metro North Hospital and Health Service, QLD Herston, Australia
| | - Jonathan C Hill
- grid.9757.c0000 0004 0415 6205Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Boyle EM, Fary RE, Lee S, Mikhailov A, Evans K, Rebbeck T, Beales DJ. Patient perspectives of care pathways for people with low back pain: A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62:102657. [PMID: 36058010 DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) care pathways aim to enhance health outcomes through patient-clinician mutual decision-making and care coordination. However, challenges to successful translation into practice include patients' understanding, expectation, and acceptance of treatment and management strategies for LBP. This study explored patients' perspectives and/or experience of care pathways and their involvement in decision-making in primary care. METHODS A qualitative descriptive design was adopted. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 participants with LBP recruited from the community. Inductive thematic analysis of the qualitative data was conducted within the design framework to enable a systematic comparison of experiences across participants and within individual cases. RESULTS Five themes described participant perspectives and understanding of care pathways: i) care pathways can guide decision-making; ii) familiarity with no and/or stepped care pathway, but preference for matched or blend of care pathways; iii) engaging in shared decision-making; iv) patient-related barriers to implementation; v) patient-related facilitators to implementation. CONCLUSIONS Participants felt that existing care pathways did not meet their needs when pain persisted. Participants preferred matched or hybrid care pathways and suggested that implementation of such pathways should focus on addressing an individual's needs. Adopting a holistic approach, and clarity in shared decision-making, were deemed crucial for effective implementation of LBP pathways in practice. Consumer (patient) engagement in the design of LBP care pathways is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen M Boyle
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
| | - Robyn E Fary
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Samantha Lee
- Department of Allied Health, SingHealth Polyclinics, Singapore
| | - Anton Mikhailov
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kerrie Evans
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Healthia Limited, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Trudy Rebbeck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darren J Beales
- Curtin enAble Institute and Curtin School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Raud B, Lanhers C, Crouzet C, Eschalier B, Bougeard F, Goldstein A, Pereira B, Coudeyre E. Identification of Responders to Balneotherapy among Adults over 60 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study with Trajectory Model Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14669. [PMID: 36429387 PMCID: PMC9690151 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Balneotherapy may be a relevant treatment for chronic low back pain (LBP) in individuals > 60 years old. This pilot study aimed to determine the effectiveness of balneotherapy for chronic LBP in people > 60 years old and to determine profiles of responders with trajectory model analysis. This was a pilot prospective open cohort study, with repeated measurements using validated questionnaires; participants were their own controls. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a change in pain intensity between the start of treatment and 3 months after treatment assessed with a numeric scale (NS) from 0 to 100 mm, with an effect size (ES) > 0.5. The assessments involved questionnaires that were self-administered on days (D) 1 and 21 and at months 3 and 6. The secondary objective was to determine the profile of responders to balneotherapy. We included 78 patients (69.2% women), mean age 68.3 ± 5.3 years. The mean pain score on the NS was 48.8 ± 19.9 at D1 and 39.1 ± 20.5 at 3 months (p < 0.001). The ES was 0.47 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25 to 0.69] for the whole sample; 36% (28/78) had an ES > 0.5; 23% (18/78) had a moderate ES (0 to 0.5); and 41% (32/78) had an ES of zero (14/78) or < 0 (18/78), corresponding to increased pain intensity. The pain trajectory model showed that the change in pain between D1 and D21 for trajectory A (larger reduction in pain intensity) was -50% [95% CI -60 to -27], and for trajectory B (smaller reduction in pain intensity), it was -13% [-33 to 0] (p < 0.001). Between Day 1 and month 3, the change for trajectory A was -33% [-54; 0] and for trajectory B was -13% [-40 to 0] (p = 0.14). Finally, between D1 and month 6, the change for trajectory A was -50% [-60 to 0] and for trajectory B was -6% [-33 to 17] (p = 0.007). The patients in trajectory A reported performing more physical activity than those in trajectory B (p = 0.04). They were also less disabled, with a mean Oswestry Disability Index of 40.4 versus 45.7 for those in trajectory A and B, respectively, (p = 0.03) and had a higher total Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale score. This real-life study of the effectiveness of balneotherapy on chronic LBP identified distinct pain trajectories and predictive variables for responders. These criteria could be used in decision-making regarding the prescription of balneotherapy, to ensure personalized management of chronic LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Raud
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Charlotte Lanhers
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Cindy Crouzet
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bénédicte Eschalier
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - François Bougeard
- Département de Médecine Générale, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anna Goldstein
- Unité de Biostatistique, Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- Unité de Biostatistique, Délégation Recherche Clinique et Innovation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Emmanuel Coudeyre
- Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, INRAE, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Spine abnormalities associated with bone edema on sacroiliac joints MRI in patients with non-inflammatory chronic back pain. Joint Bone Spine 2022; 89:105436. [PMID: 35777553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Revised: 05/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether bone marrow edema (BME) fulfilling the ASAS definition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sacroiliitis is associated with non-inflammatory spine abnormalities in patients with definite mechanical chronic back pain (CBP). METHODS Patients with definite mechanical CBP, according to the physician, started before the age of 45 and be lasting for more than 3months but less than 3years underwent a protocolized MRI and radiographs of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and spine. BME and structural changes were scored, by three readers, for SIJ as well as non-inflammatory abnormalities for spine, including degenerative lesions and static disorders. Univariate analysis by Chi2 test was performed to search a statistical association between BME fulfilling the ASAS definition of MRI sacroiliitis and the presence of at least one non-inflammatory spine abnormality. RESULTS A total of 94 patients were analyzed, 27 (29%) patients had BME and 16 (17%) patients had BME fulfilling the ASAS definition of MRI sacroiliitis; 86 (91.5%) patients had at least one non-inflammatory spine abnormality which are associated into 3 distinct clusters. BME was slightly more frequent at the lower and posterior part of the SIJ. MRI sacroiliitis was associated with interspinous bursitis, facet joint effusion and lateral spinal deviation and was more likely in patients with at least one non-inflammatory spine abnormality (OR: 4.96, 95% CI [1.47; 16.72]). CONCLUSIONS BME fulfilling the ASAS definition of MRI sacroiliitis is significantly associated with non-inflammatory spine abnormalities in patients with mechanical CBP.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hochheim M, Ramm P, Wunderlich M, Amelung V. A cross-sectional study to validate an administrative back pain severity classification tool based on the graded chronic pain scale. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16927. [PMID: 36209228 PMCID: PMC9547910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21422-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment of chronic lower back pain (CLBP) should be stratified for best medical and economic outcome. To improve the targeting of potential participants for exclusive therapy offers from payers, Freytag et al. developed a tool to classify back pain chronicity classes (CC) based on claim data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the criterion validity of the model. Administrative claim data and self-reported patient information from 3,506 participants (2014-2021) in a private health insurance health management programme in Germany were used to validate the tool. Sensitivity, specificity, and Matthews' correlation coefficient (MCC) were calculated comparing the prediction with actual grades based on von Korff's graded chronic pain scale (GCPS). The secondary outcome was an updated view on direct health care costs (€) of patients with back pain (BP) grouped by GCPS. Results showed a fair correlation between predicted CC and actual GCPS grades. A total of 69.7% of all cases were correctly classified. Sensitivity and specificity rates of 54.6 and 76.4% underlined precision. Correlation between CC and GCPS with an MCC of 0.304 also indicated a fair relationship between prediction and observation. Cost data could be clearly grouped by GCPS: the higher the grade, the higher the costs and the use of health care. This was the first study to compare the predicted severity of BP using claim data with the actual severity of BP by GCPS. Based on the results, the usage of CC as a single tool to determine who receives CLBP treatment cannot be recommended. CC is a good tool to segment candidates for specific types of intervention in BP. However, it cannot replace a medical screening at the beginning of an intervention, as the rate of false negatives is too high. Trial registration The study was conducted using routinely collected data from an intervention, which was previously evaluated and registered retrospectively in the German Registry of Clinical Trials under DRKS00015463 (04/09/2018). Informed consent and the self-reported questionnaire have remained unchanged since the study and, therefore, are still valid according to the ethics proposal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Hochheim
- Institute of Epidemiology, Social Medicine, and Health System Research, Hannover Medical School (MHH), Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany.
| | - P Ramm
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - M Wunderlich
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| | - V Amelung
- Generali Health Solutions GmbH (GHS), Hansaring 40 - 50, 50670, Köln, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Demont A, Benaïssa L, Recoque V, Desmeules F, Bourmaud A. Spinal pain patients seeking care in primary care and referred to physiotherapy: A cross-sectional study on patients characteristics, referral information and physiotherapy care offered by general practitioners and physiotherapists in France. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274021. [PMID: 36067139 PMCID: PMC9447922 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives
To describe spinal pain patients referred by their treating general practitioners to physiotherapy care, examine to which extent physiotherapy interventions proposed by general practitioners and physiotherapists were compliant to evidence based recommendations, and evaluate concordance between providers in terms of diagnosis and contraindications to physiotherapy interventions.
Methods
This study included spinal pain patients recruited from a random sample of sixty French physiotherapists. Physiotherapists were asked to supply patients’ physiotherapy records and characteristics from the general practitioner’s physiotherapy referral for the five new consecutive patients referred to physiotherapy. General practitioner’s physiotherapy referral and physiotherapists’ clinical findings characteristics were analyzed and compared to evidence-based recommendations using Chi-squared tests. Cohen’s kappas were calculated for diagnosis and contraindications to physiotherapy interventions.
Results
Three hundred patients with spinal pain were included from sixty physiotherapists across France. The mean age of the patients was 48.0 ± 7.2 years and 53% were female. The most common spinal pain was low back pain (n = 147). Diagnoses or reason of referral formulated by general practitioners were present for 27% of all patients (n = 82). Compared to general practitioners, physiotherapists recommended significantly more frequently recommended interventions such as education, spinal exercises or manual therapy. General practitioners prescribed significantly more frequently passive physiotherapy approaches such as massage therapy and electrotherapy. The overall proportion of agreement beyond chance for identification of a diagnosis or reason of referral was 41% with a weak concordance (κ = 0.19; 95%CI: 0.08–0.31). The overall proportion of compliant physiotherapists was significantly higher than for general practitioners (76.7% vs 47.0%; p<0.001).
Conclusions
We found that information required for the referral of spinal pain patients to physiotherapy is often incomplete. The majority of general practitioners did not conform to evidence-based recommendations in terms of prescribed specific physiotherapy care; in contrast to a majority of physiotherapists.
Trial registration
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04177121
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Demont
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
- * E-mail:
| | - Leila Benaïssa
- Physiotherapy School, University of Orléans, Orléans, France
| | | | - François Desmeules
- School of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital Research Center, University of Montreal Affiliated Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Aurélie Bourmaud
- Université Paris Cité, Inserm, ECEVE, Paris, France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Robert Debré, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Yue L, Sun MS, Chen H, Mu GZ, Sun HL. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:5937250. [PMID: 34840977 PMCID: PMC8617566 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5937250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for the treatment of chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHODS This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement standard. We identified relevant studies by searching multiple electronic databases, trial registries, and websites up to April 30, 2021, and examining reference lists. We selected RCTs that compared ESWT, in unimodal or multimodal therapeutic approaches, with sham ESWT or other active therapies. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias and quality of the evidence. The main outcomes were pain intensity and disability status, examined as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of bias was assessed by using Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool and Jadad score, and GRADE was applied to determine the confidence in effect estimates. Heterogeneity was explored using sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. RESULTS Ten RCTs, including a total of 455 young to middle-aged individuals (29.2-55.8 years), were identified. Compared with control, the ESWT group showed lower pain intensity at month 1 (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI -1.21 to -0.42), as well as lower disability score at month 1 (SMD = -1.45, 95% CI -2.68 to -0.22) and at month 3 (SMD = -0.69, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.31). No serious shockwave-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION The use of ESWT in CLBP patients results in significant and quantifiable reductions in pain and disability in the short term. However, further well-conducted RCTs are necessary for building high-quality evidence and promoting the application of ESWT in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Yue
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Ming-shuai Sun
- Department of General Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Guan-zhang Mu
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Hao-lin Sun
- Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gevers-Montoro C, Provencher B, Descarreaux M, Ortega de Mues A, Piché M. Clinical Effectiveness and Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Spine Pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2021; 2:765921. [PMID: 35295422 PMCID: PMC8915715 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2021.765921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Spine pain is a highly prevalent condition affecting over 11% of the world's population. It is the single leading cause of activity limitation and ranks fourth in years lost to disability globally, representing a significant personal, social, and economic burden. For the vast majority of patients with back and neck pain, a specific pathology cannot be identified as the cause for their pain, which is then labeled as non-specific. In a growing proportion of these cases, pain persists beyond 3 months and is referred to as chronic primary back or neck pain. To decrease the global burden of spine pain, current data suggest that a conservative approach may be preferable. One of the conservative management options available is spinal manipulative therapy (SMT), the main intervention used by chiropractors and other manual therapists. The aim of this narrative review is to highlight the most relevant and up-to-date evidence on the effectiveness (as it compares to other interventions in more pragmatic settings) and efficacy (as it compares to inactive controls under highly controlled conditions) of SMT for the management of neck pain and low back pain. Additionally, a perspective on the current recommendations on SMT for spine pain and the needs for future research will be provided. In summary, SMT may be as effective as other recommended therapies for the management of non-specific and chronic primary spine pain, including standard medical care or physical therapy. Currently, SMT is recommended in combination with exercise for neck pain as part of a multimodal approach. It may also be recommended as a frontline intervention for low back pain. Despite some remaining discrepancies, current clinical practice guidelines almost universally recommend the use of SMT for spine pain. Due to the low quality of evidence, the efficacy of SMT compared with a placebo or no treatment remains uncertain. Therefore, future research is needed to clarify the specific effects of SMT to further validate this intervention. In addition, factors that predict these effects remain to be determined to target patients who are more likely to obtain positive outcomes from SMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Gevers-Montoro
- Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- Cognition, Neurosciences, Affect et Comportement (CogNAC) Research Group, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- Madrid College of Chiropractic—Real Centro Universitario (RCU) María Cristina, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain
| | - Benjamin Provencher
- Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- Cognition, Neurosciences, Affect et Comportement (CogNAC) Research Group, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Martin Descarreaux
- Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- GRAN Research Group, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
| | - Arantxa Ortega de Mues
- Madrid College of Chiropractic—Real Centro Universitario (RCU) María Cristina, San Lorenzo de El Escorial, Spain
| | - Mathieu Piché
- Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- Cognition, Neurosciences, Affect et Comportement (CogNAC) Research Group, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- *Correspondence: Mathieu Piché
| |
Collapse
|