Evaluation of the potentials of autologous blood injection for healing in diabetic foot ulcers

Potential of stem cells for treating infected Diabetic Foot Wounds and Ulcers: a systematic review

Infected diabetic foot ulcers (iDFUs) cause great concern, as they generally heal poorly and are precursive of diabetic-related foot amputation and even death. Scientists have tested various techniques in attempts to ascertain the best treatment for iDFUs; however, the results have remained inconclusive. Stem cell therapy (SCT) appears to improve iDFU through its antimicrobial impacts, yet cogent information regarding the repair of iDFUs with SCT is lacking. Herein, published articles are evaluated to report coherent information about the antimicrobial effects of SCT on the repair of iDFUs in diabetic animals and humans. In this systematic review, we searched the Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for relevant full-text English language articles published from 2000 to 2022 that described stem cell antimicrobial treatments, infected diabetic wounds, or ulcers. Ultimately, six preclinical and five clinical studies pertaining to the effectiveness of SCT on healing infected diabetic wounds or ulcers were selected. Some of the human studies confirmed that SCT is a promising therapy for diabetic wounds and ulcers. Notably, more controlled studies performed on animal models revealed that stem cells combined with a biostimulator such as photobiomodulation decreased colony forming units and hastened healing in infected diabetic wounds. Moreover, stem cells alone had lower therapeutic impact than when combined with a biostimulant.

A humoral solution: Autologous blood products and tissue repair

Autologous blood-derived products (ABP) are the focus of growing scientific interest and are investigated and used for multiple medical indications. ABPs hold promise thanks to their availability, ease of preparation, and low risk of adverse allogenic reaction, hypersensitivity, and contamination. Compositional analysis of ABPs reveals a diverse mixture of cellular components, cytokines and growth factors that play roles in healing processes such as tissue proliferation and angiogenesis, modulation of the local environment through chemotaxis and regulation of inflammation and the extracellular matrix, as well as several immunomodulatory actions. Thus, the administration of ABP induces supraphysiological levels of components necessary for orchestrating reparative efforts in currently difficult-to-treat medical conditions. In this article, we review the variety of autologous blood-derived products, their composition, current clinical uses, regulatory climate, and mechanisms of action.

Intramuscular autologous blood therapy - a systematic review of controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Autologous whole blood (AWB) is used in complementary medicine for the treatment of infections and skin disorders. So far, the efficacy of AWB is discussed controversially.

METHODS

To estimate the efficacy of AWB therapy and to gather evidence in regard to effector mechanisms, we effected a systematic review of articles accessible through Pubmed and Cambase. Further trials were identified through references and by contacting study authors. Prospective controlled trials concerning intramuscular AWB therapy were included with the exception of trials using oxygenated, UV radiated or heated blood. Information was extracted on the indication, design, additions to AWB and outcome. Full texts were screened for information about the effector mechanisms.

RESULTS

Eight trials suited our criteria. In three controlled trials about atopic dermatitis and urticaria, AWB therapy showed beneficial effects. In five randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two of which concerned respiratory tract infections, two urticaria and one ankylosing spondylitis, no efficacy could be found. A quantitative assessment was not possible due to the heterogeneity of the included studies. We only found four controlled trials with sample sizes bigger than 37 individuals per group. Only one study investigated the effector mechanisms of AWB.

CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence for efficacy of AWB therapy in urticaria patients and patients with atopic eczema. Firm conclusions can, however, not be drawn. We see a great need for further RCTs with adequate sample sizes and for investigation of the effector mechanisms of AWB therapy.