Use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in cystic fibrosis patients with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes awaiting transplantation

Continuous glucose monitoring versus self-monitoring of blood glucose in the management of cystic fibrosis related diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treatment of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) can improve outcomes and use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) can positively impact glycemic control. We conducted a systematic review to assess current evidence on CGM compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in the management of CFRD to determine its effect on glycemic, pulmonary, non-pulmonary and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

Using pre-defined selection criteria, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, grey literature and six relevant journals for studies using CGM and/or SMBG in CFRD with greater than 6 weeks of follow-up and reported change in HbA1c. The primary outcome was weighted mean difference (WMD) in plasma HbA1c between CGM and SMBG groups. Secondary outcomes included exploring interrelationships between CGM metrics and effects on disease-specific pulmonary, non-pulmonary and quality of life outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 1671 references were retrieved, 862 studies screened and 124 full-texts assessed for eligibility. No studies directly compared CGM to SMBG. A meta-analysis of seventeen studies of 416 individuals (CGM = 138, SMBG = 278) found CGM group had 4.1 mmol/mol (95% CI -7.9 to -0.30, p = 0.034) lower HbA1c compared to SMBG group. Most studies demonstrated moderate-to-high risk of bias. Publication bias was also present. Heterogeneity was high and meta-regression identified duration of follow-up in SMBG group as main contributor.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest use of CGM may be associated with improved glycemic control compared to SMBG in CFRD, however evidence of benefit on pulmonary, non-pulmonary and psychosocial outcomes are lacking.

Drug treatments for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

BACKGROUND

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/L (125 mg/dL); or oral glucose tolerance tests greater than 11.11 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) at two hours; or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%. This is an update of a previously published review.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effectiveness of insulin and oral agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences. Date of most recent register search: 10 September 2020. We searched online trials registries; date of most recent searches: 21 March 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of pharmacological diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed CFRD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Authors also used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 29 trials (45 references). Four included trials provide results: one short-term single-center cross-over trial (seven adults) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication in adults with CFRD and normal fasting glucose; one long-term multicenter trial (61 adults with CFRD) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo; one long-term multicenter trial (67 adults) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide; and one 12-week single-center cross-over trial (20 adults) comparing the long-acting insulin glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. Two ongoing trials of newly approved incretin mimics have been noted for possible future inclusion. Downgrading of the quality of the evidence was mainly due to risks of bias across all domains, but particularly due to concerns surrounding allocation concealment and selective reporting. There were also some concerns due to imprecision from small sample sizes and low event rates. Finally, there may be some bias due to the amounts of insulin and repaglinide given not being comparable. Data from one trial comparing insulin to placebo (39 participants) did not show any difference between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels (very low-quality evidence), lung function (low-quality evidence) or nutritional status (low-quality evidence). Similarly, no differences between groups were seen for the secondary outcomes of number of hypoglycemic episodes (low-quality evidence), secondary infection complications or quality of life (QoL). These results were mirrored in the narrative reports for the second trial in this comparison (seven participants). Data from the one-year trial comparing repaglinide to placebo (38 participants), showed no differences between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels (very low-quality evidence), lung function (low-quality evidence) and nutritional status (low-quality evidence). Also, no differences were seen between groups for the secondary outcomes of number of hypoglycemic episodes (low-quality evidence), secondary infection complications or QoL. These findings were mirrored in the narrative reports for the second trial (n = 7) in this comparison. Three trials compared insulin to repaglinide (119 participants). Data from one trial (n = 67) showed no difference in blood glucose levels at either 12 months (high-quality evidence) or 24 months; narrative reports from one trial (45 participants) reported no difference between groups, but the second trial (7 participants) reported a beneficial effect of insulin over repaglinide. Two trials (112 participants) found no difference between insulin and repaglinide in lung function or nutritional status (moderate-quality evidence). Two trials (56 participants) reported no difference in the number of hypoglycemic episodes (low-quality evidence). One trial (45 participants) reported no difference between groups in secondary infections and cystic fibrosis QoL. The single trial comparing glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin did not report directly on the review's primary outcomes, but did report no differences between groups in post-prandial glucose values and weight; neither group reported infectious complications. There was no difference in episodes of hypoglycemia (very low-quality evidence) and while there was no difference reported in QoL, all participants opted to continue treatment with glargine after the trial was completed. Mortality was not reported by any trial in any comparison, but death was not given as a reason for withdrawal in any trial.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has not found any conclusive evidence that any agent has a distinct advantage over another in controlling hyperglycemia or the clinical outcomes associated with CFRD. Given the treatment burden already experienced by people with cystic fibrosis, oral therapy may be a viable treatment option. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes and its impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority. Specifically, investigators should evaluate adherence to different therapies and also whether there is benefit in using additional hypoglycemic agents as well as the newly approved incretin mimics. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should also be further investigated as adjuvant therapy to insulin.

Insulin and oral agents for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

BACKGROUND

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/liter (125 mg/deciliter); or oral glucose tolerance tests greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter) at two hours; or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effectiveness of insulin and oral agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 18 February 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 22 trials (34 references). Four trials (200 participants) are included: one short-term single-center trial (n = 7) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication in people with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and normal fasting glucose; one long-term multicenter trial (n = 100, 74 of whom had cystic fibrosis-related diabetes) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo; one long-term multicenter trial (n = 73) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide; and one 12-week single-center trial (n = 20) comparing the long-acting insulin glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.Two trials with data for the comparison of insulin to placebo did not report any significant differences between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels, lung function and nutritional status. This was also true for the single trial with data for the comparison of repaglinide to placebo. Two trials (one lasting one year and one lasting two years) contributed data for the comparison of insulin versus repaglinide. There were no significant differences for the primary outcomes at any time point, except at one year (in the two-year trial) when the insulin group had significant improvement in z score for body mass index compared to the repaglinide group. The single trial comparing glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin also did not report any significant differences in the review's primary outcomes. A few cases of hypoglycemia were seen in three out of the four trials (none in the longest trial), but these events resolved without further treatment.There was an unclear risk of bias from randomization and allocation concealment in two of the four included trials as the authors did not report any details; in the remaining two studies details for randomization led to a low risk of bias, but only one had sufficient details on allocation concealment to allow a low risk judgement, the second was unclear. There was a high risk from blinding for all trials (except for the comparison of oral repaglinide versus placebo) due to the nature of the interventions. Complete data for all outcomes were not available from any trial leading to a high risk of reporting bias. The amounts of insulin and repaglinide administered were not comparable and this may lead to bias in the results. None of the included trials were powered to show a significant improvement in lung function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has not found any significant conclusive evidence that long-acting insulins, short-acting insulins or oral hypoglycemic agents have a distinct advantage over one another in controlling hyperglycemia or clinical outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes with this impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority.There is no demonstrated advantage yet established for using oral hypoglycemic agents over insulin, and further trials need to be evaluated to establish whether there is clear benefit for using hypoglycemic agents. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should be further investigated to see if there may be a clinical advantage to adding these medications to insulin as adjuvant therapy.

Why is insulin pump treatment rarely used in adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes?

BACKGROUND

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) has increased steadily in the last years. Compared with conventional insulin injection regimes, major advantages might be a nearly physiological insulin secretion, lower rates of hypoglycemia, higher flexibility in daily life, and increased quality of life. Data on CSII in cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze current use of insulin pumps in CFRD and compare demographics of pump-treated patients between CFRD and T1D.

METHODS

Data from the prospective German/Austrian diabetes patient registry on insulin-treated patients with either CFRD (n = 515) or T1D (n = 43 165) aged >10 yr at manifestation of diabetes were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 4.1% (n = 21) of CFRD and 17.7% (n = 7647) of T1D patients received insulin pump treatment within the recent year of care (p < 0.001). Pump-treated patients with CFRD had a significantly shorter duration of diabetes [median (Q1 ; Q3 ): 5.8 (2.9; 9.5) vs. 7.8 (4.3; 20.4) yr, p = 0.026] and tended to be younger [22.0 (18.2; 30.1) vs. 24.9 (17.3; 45.9) yr] than pump-treated T1D patients. Age at initiation of CSII seemed to be lower in CFRD [19.2 (16.5; 29.2) vs. 23.3 (14.8; 43.5) yr]. Insulin pump therapy was used slightly more often in male CFRD patients than females (4.7 vs. 3.6%), whereas in T1D the opposite was observed (14.9 vs. 21.2%, p < 0.001). Discontinuation rate of CSII was higher in CFRD than T1D (30.0 vs. 12.7%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite potential advantages, insulin pump therapy was rarely used among adolescent and young adult CFRD patients.

Insulin and oral agents for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

BACKGROUND

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/liter (125 mg/deciliter); or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the effectiveness of agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 22 July 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.

MAIN RESULTS

The searches identified 19 studies (28 references). Three studies (107 participants) are included: one comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication (short-term single-center study of seven patients with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and normal fasting glucose); one comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo (long-term multi-center study with 81 patients, 61 of whom had cystic fibrosis-related diabetes); and one 12-week single-center study comparing the long-acting insulin, glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. The long-term trial of insulin and repaglinide demonstrated no significant difference between treatments. In the smaller study comparing insulin and oral repaglinide, there were two incidents of significant hypoglycemia in the insulin group compared to one in the repaglinide group; in the larger study there were five incidents of significant hypoglycemia in the insulin group and six in the repaglinide group. The study comparing glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin demonstrated a statistically non-significant weight increase in with longer-acting insulin given at bedtime and reported a mean of six hypoglycemia events in the glargine group compared to five events in the neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin group. None of the three included studies were powered to show a significant improvement in lung function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has not found any significant conclusive evidence that long-acting insulins, short-acting insulins or oral hypoglycemic agents have a distinct advantage over one another in controlling hyperglycemia or clinical outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes with this impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority.There is no demonstrated advantage yet established for using oral hypoglycemic agents over insulin, and further studies need to be evaluated to establish whether there is clear benefit for using hypoglycemic agents. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should be further investigated to see if there may be a clinical advantage to adding these medications to insulin as adjuvant therapy.

Specific use of CSII during enteral nocturnal nutrition in a child with type 1 diabetes, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, and Down syndrome

The management of insulin therapy in diabetic patients who have comorbidities that involve nutritional aspects, is a major challenge for diabetes care teams. In diabetic patients with compromised nutritional status, artificial nutrition, both enteral or parenteral, may help in the treatment of chronic and acute diseases, leading to better and faster recover of the health status but, if not adequately associated with insulin therapy, it may negatively affect blood glucose levels and lead to poorer metabolic control. In particular, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of diabetic patients during enteral nutrition therapy are not currently available and, therefore, medical practices are often based on case reports, rather than outcomes of research. We report our experience with a diabetic patient receiving nocturnal enteral feeding due to comorbidities and malnutrition, who was followed up at our centre and precociously treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion after the onset of type 1 diabetes. There is great need for adequately powered randomized controlled trials to provide scientific evidence for the insulin treatment of diabetic patients undergoing enteral feeding.

Glucose sensing neurons in the ventromedial hypothalamus

Neurons whose activity is regulated by glucose are found in a number of brain regions. Glucose-excited (GE) neurons increase while glucose-inhibited (GI) neurons decrease their action potential frequency as interstitial brain glucose levels increase. We hypothesize that these neurons evolved to sense and respond to severe energy deficit (e.g., fasting) that threatens the brains glucose supply. During modern times, they are also important for the restoration of blood glucose levels following insulin-induced hypoglycemia. Our data suggest that impaired glucose sensing by hypothalamic glucose sensing neurons may contribute to the syndrome known as hypoglycemia-associated autonomic failure in which the mechanisms which restore euglycemia following hypoglycemia become impaired. On the other hand, increased responses of glucose sensing neurons to glucose deficit may play a role in the development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and obesity. This review will discuss the mechanisms by which glucose sensing neurons sense changes in interstitial glucose and explore the roles of these specialized glucose sensors in glucose and energy homeostasis.

Use of sensor-augmented insulin pump in patient with diabetes and cystic fibrosis: evidence for improvement in metabolic control

Cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) is a frequent complication of cystic fibrosis. We report the significant improvement of diabetes control and quality of life in a CFRD patient using the sensor-augmented insulin pump. The system gives the patient the highest degree of flexibility, which is required in CFRD since food intake and activity levels vary widely from day to day, depending on the rapid changes of health status.

Characterization of glucosensing neuron subpopulations in the arcuate nucleus: integration in neuropeptide Y and pro-opio melanocortin networks?

Four types of responses to glucose changes have been described in the arcuate nucleus (ARC): excitation or inhibition by low glucose concentrations <5 mmol/l (glucose-excited and -inhibited neurons) and by high glucose concentrations >5 mmol/l (high glucose-excited and -inhibited neurons). However, the ability of the same ARC neuron to detect low and high glucose concentrations has never been investigated. Moreover, the mechanism involved in mediating glucose sensitivity in glucose-inhibited neurons and the neurotransmitter identity (neuropeptide Y [NPY] or pro-opio melanocortin [POMC]) of glucosensing neurons has remained controversial. Using patch-clamp recordings on acute mouse brain slices, successive extracellular glucose changes greater than and less than 5 mmol/l show that glucose-excited, high glucose-excited, glucose-inhibited, and high glucose-inhibited neurons are different glucosensing cell subpopulations. Glucose-inhibited neurons directly detect decreased glucose via closure of a chloride channel. Using transgenic NPY-green fluorescent protein (GFP) and POMC-GFP mice, we show that 40% of NPY neurons are glucose-inhibited neurons. In contrast, <5% of POMC neurons responded to changes in extracellular glucose >5 mmol/l. In vivo results confirm the lack of glucose sensitivity of POMC neurons. Taken together, hypo- and hyperglycemia are detected by distinct populations of glucosensing neurons, and POMC and NPY neurons are not solely responsible for ARC glucosensing.

Insulin and oral agents for managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes

BACKGROUND

Insulin therapy is recommended by the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/liter (125 mg/deciliter) or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter).

OBJECTIVES

To examine the evidence that, when treated with agents for managing diabetes, people with cystic fibrosis improve their sugar metabolic control resulting in beneficial impact on lung function and the ability to maintain optimal weight.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary and North American Cystic Fibrosis Conference symposia. Date of the most recent search of the Group's Trials Register: December 2004.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of diabetes therapy for one month or longer in people with cystic fibrosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

No studies were found which were eligible for inclusion in this review.

MAIN RESULTS

Six references to four studies were identified by the searches, but none were eligible for inclusion in the review as they were not randomized controlled trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, a condition which complicates the course of cystic fibrosis, insulin therapy is the recommended and most widely used treatment method. Lung function has been reported to improve with the use of insulin, but this has not been correlated to the degree in which sugar metabolism has been affected. While the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends insulin therapy be used in managing diabetes, this systematic review identifies the need for a multicentre randomized controlled trial assessing both the efficacy of insulin or other insulin-releasing or insulin-sensitizing medications and their possible adverse effects in managing cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.