Chronic rhinosinusitis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy

Cystic fibrosis-related chronic rhinosinusitis: the key role of a comprehensive evaluation in the era of highly effective modulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is prevalent in cystic fibrosis (CF), significantly affecting quality of life. The introduction of CFTR modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), offers promise for improving sinonasal outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort multicenter study analyzing electronic medical records of 45 adult CF patients with CRS, predominantly heterozygous for the ΔF508 mutation, treated with ETI between January 2018 and December 2023. Assessments included Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22), Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), modified Lund-Kennedy Score (mLKS), Lund-Mackay Score (LMS), and olfactory function using smell loss visual analog scale (VAS) and Sniffin' Sticks identification test (SSIT).

RESULTS

After 12 months of ETI therapy, significant improvements were observed in pulmonary function parameters (FEV1, FVC), CRS severity scores (SNOT-22, NPS, mLKS), radiological findings (LMS), and olfactory function. Subgroup analysis suggested enhanced efficacy in patients with prior endoscopic sinonasal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

ETI therapy demonstrates comprehensive improvements in CRS and olfactory function in CF patients, highlighting the potential of CFTR modulators in managing sinonasal manifestations.

Functional and radiological sinonasal outcomes of CFTR modulators for sinus disease in cystic fibrosis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators improve pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF) by stabilizing the CFTR protein on respiratory epithelial surfaces. To determine the efficacy of CFTR modulators on sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF, we performed a meta-analysis of clinical trials to date that include functional and radiographic evidence of sinus disease.

METHODS

English full-text articles were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Two reviewers screened articles and a third reviewer resolved disagreements. Articles were included if they reported functional or radiological sinonasal outcomes in patients with CF before and after CFTR modulator therapies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed, and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions tool was used for quality assessment. The generic inverse variance method with random effects model was used for meta-analysis. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and mean difference (MD) were used as effect measurements.

RESULTS

Seven prospective and two retrospective studies representing 248 patients were included in this analysis. There was a significant improvement in sinonasal outcome test-22 scores on elexacaftor‒tezacaftor‒ivacaftor (MD = 12.80, [95% confidence interval, CI: 10.46‒15.13], p < 0.001, n = 222), with no heterogeneity detected (I2 = 0%, p = 0.820). There was also a significant improvement in Lund‒Mackay scores (SMD = 1.25, [95% CI: 0.58‒1.91], p < 0.001, n = 88), with heterogeneity detected (I2 = 67%, p = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

CFTR modulators improve functional and radiologic sinonasal outcomes. Given the utility of CFTR modulators, the treatment paradigm for CF-related chronic rhinosinusitis promises to evolve.

Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor improves nasal nitric oxide in patients with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND

In health, nitric oxide (NO) shows high concentrations in the upper airways, while nasal NO (nNO) is significantly lower in patients with sinonasal inflammation, such as people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). In PwCF treated with elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI; PwCF-ETI), clinical improvement of sinonasal symptoms and inflammation was observed. We therefore hypothesised that ETI may increase nNO in PwCF.

METHODS

25 PwCF-ETI underwent nNO measurement at baseline and after 3 to 24 months of ETI treatment. NNO was measured using velum closure (VC) techniques in cooperative patients and tidal breathing (TB) for all patients. As controls, 7 CF patients not eligible for ETI (PwCF-non ETI) and 32 healthy controls (HC) were also repeatedly investigated.

RESULTS

In PwCF-ETI, sinonasal symptoms, lung function parameters and sweat chloride levels improved from baseline to follow-up whereas there was no change in PwCF-non ETI and HC. NNO increased from a median (IQR) value at baseline to follow-up from 348.2 (274.4) ppb to 779.6 (364.7) ppb for VC (P < 0.001) and from 198.2 (107.0) ppb to 408.3 (236.1) ppb for TB (P < 0.001). At follow-up, PwCF-ETI reached nNO values in the normal range. In PwCF-non ETI as well as HC, nNO did not change between baseline and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In PwCF-ETI, the nNO values significantly increased after several months of ETI treatment in comparison to baseline and reached values in the normal range. This suggests that nNO is a potential non-invasive biomarker to examine sinonasal inflammatory disease in PwCF and supports the observation of clinical improvement in these patients.

Predictors of Sinonasal Improvement After Highly Effective Modulator Therapy in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

OBJECTIVES

The 22-question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT-22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF).

METHODS

Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT-22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3-6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT-22.

RESULTS

A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT-22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre- and post-HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT-22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT-22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14-18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39-20.11) were associated with greater SNOT-22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution-based methods was 8.5.

CONCLUSION

Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT-22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non-CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT-22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3965-3973, 2024.

The criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis in children with cystic fibrosis are rarely fulfilled after initiation of CFTR modulator treatment

The vast majority of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) have untreated secondary chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Whereas the introduction of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator (CFTRm) treatment regime has improved the lung function of pwCF, few studies have been published examining the effect on sinonasal symptoms in children. Our aim was to explore the effect of double CFTRm treatment on CRS and olfaction in children with CF. pwCF were included in this non-randomized cross-sectional study, where an otolaryngologist performed a complete ENT examination before initiating treatment with elaxacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI). Twenty-three pwCF aged 6-12 years were included. Eighteen of 23 patients were on a double CFTRm treatment, and 5 patients were CFTRm naive, respectively. Altogether, 19 had normal olfaction, 20 had none or mild CRS symptoms according to SNOT-22, and 14 had a normal endoscopy. None of the patients had symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis lasting for more than 12 weeks, thus none of the patients fulfilled the criteria for CRS. Children with CF treated with double CFTRm have few to no symptoms of CRS and normal olfaction, which is an improvement compared with children following treatment modalities prior to CFTRm.

Patient perspectives on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis: Symptom prioritization in the era of highly effective modulator therapy

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is common in people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Rhinologic symptom prioritization and areas that influence CRS treatment choices, including pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), remain understudied.

METHODS

Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled at eight centers into a prospective, observational study (2019-2023). Participants were administered the 22-SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey and a modified SNOT-22 instrument examining symptom importance. We determined importance rankings for individual symptoms and SNOT-22 symptom importance subdomains in two sets of subgroups-those pursuing ESS versus continuing medical management (CMT), and those on elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) versus not on ETI.

RESULTS

Among 69 participants, the highest priorities were nasal congestion (n = 48, 69.6% important), post-nasal discharge (32, 46.4%), facial pain (29, 43.3%), waking up tired (27, 39.1%), and fatigue (26, 37.7%). Those electing surgery (n = 23) prioritized sleep and psychological dysfunction symptoms compared to those pursuing CMT (n = 49) (sleep median score = 19.0 [interquartile range: 12.0, 25.0] vs. 4.5 [0.0, 12.8]; p < 0.0001; psychological = 17.0 [7.0, 26.0] vs. 7.0 [0.0, 15.8]; p = 0.002). ETI users had comparable SNOT-22 total symptom importance scores to non-ETI users (p = 0.14). Non-ETI users (n = 34) showed a trend toward prioritizing sleep symptoms compared to ETI users (n = 35) (13.0 [2.8, 22.3] vs. 6.0 [2.0, 17.0]; p = 0.055).

CONCLUSIONS

Nasal congestion and post-nasal discharge were top priorities reported by PwCF + CRS. Those electing surgery prioritized sleep and psychological symptoms, highlighting their importance in pre-operative discussions. Non-ETI users' prioritization of sleep improvement may highlight their unique disease impact and therapeutic needs; however, additional investigation is required.