1
|
Eckert MA, Benitez A, Soler ZM, Dubno JR, Schlosser RJ. Gray matter and episodic memory associations with olfaction in middle-aged to older adults. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:961-971. [PMID: 37897207 PMCID: PMC11045322 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age-related declines in olfaction contribute to low quality of life and appear to occur with declines in cognitive function, including diminished episodic memory. We tested the hypothesis that low gray matter volume within cortical regions that support olfaction and episodic memory can explain age-related differences in olfactory and episodic memory functions. METHODS T1-weighted images, Sniffin' Sticks olfactory measures, and the NIH Toolbox-Cognition Battery were administered to 131 middle-aged to older adults (50-86 years; 66% female). Correlation was used to examine the associations between these measures. A network-based image processing approach was then used to examine the degree to which spatial patterns of gray matter variance were related to the olfactory and cognitive measures. Structural equation modeling was used to characterize the relative specificity of olfactory, cognitive, gray matter, and aging associations. RESULTS Olfactory threshold, discrimination, and identification exhibited small to medium effect size associations with episodic memory performance (rs = 0.27-0.42, ps < 0.002). Gray matter volume within medial temporal and orbitofrontal cortex was also related to olfactory (discrimination and identification) and episodic memory function (rs = 0.21-0.36, ps < 0.019). Age and episodic memory explained the same variance in olfaction that was explained by the medial temporal and orbitofrontal pattern of gray matter volume. CONCLUSIONS The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that identifying mechanisms contributing to differences in medial temporal and orbitofrontal cortex will advance our understanding of co-morbid olfactory and cognitive declines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A. Eckert
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
| | | | - Zachary M. Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Judy R. Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beswick DM, Liu CM, Overdevest JB, Zemke A, Khatiwada A, Gudis DA, Miller JE, Kimple A, Tervo JP, DiMango E, Goralski JL, Keating C, Senior B, Stapleton AL, Eshaghian PH, Mace JC, Markarian K, Alt JA, Bodner TE, Chowdhury NI, Getz AE, Hwang PH, Khanwalker A, Lee JT, Li DA, Norris M, Nayak JV, Owens C, Patel ZM, Poch K, Schlosser RJ, Smith KA, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Suh JD, Turner GA, Wang MB, Saavedra MT, Taylor Cousar JL. Predictors of Sinonasal Improvement After Highly Effective Modulator Therapy in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis. Laryngoscope 2024. [PMID: 38634358 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The 22-question SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) assesses chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) severity. We aimed to identify predictors of SNOT-22 score improvement following highly effective modulator therapy (HEMT) initiation and to corroborate the SNOT-22 minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF). METHODS Prospective observational data was pooled from four studies across 10 US centers investigating people with CF (PwCF) and CRS. Three studies evaluated HEMT's impact on CRS. For participants enrolled prior to HEMT initiation, SNOT-22 scores were obtained at baseline and after 3-6 months of HEMT. Multivariate regression identified predictors of improvement. Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were used to assess internal consistency and calculate the MCID of the SNOT-22. RESULTS A total of 184 PwCF participated with mean baseline SNOT-22 scores ranging from 18.1 to 56.7. Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.90 across sites. Participants at sites with pre- and post-HEMT data reported improvement in SNOT-22 scores after initiating HEMT (all p < 0.05). Worse baseline SNOT-22 score (odds ratio (OR): 1.05, p < 0.001, 95% CI: 1.02-1.08), F508del homozygosity (OR: 4.30, p = 0.040, 95% CI: 1.14-18.99), and absence of prior modulator therapy (OR: 4.99, p = 0.017, 95% CI: 1.39-20.11) were associated with greater SNOT-22 improvement. The mean MCID calculated via distribution-based methods was 8.5. CONCLUSION Worse baseline sinonasal symptoms, F508del homozygosity, and absence of prior modulator therapy predicted greater improvement after HEMT initiation. The mean MCID for SNOT-22 in PwCF is 8.5 points, similar to non-CF individuals with CRS, and provides a threshold specifically for PwCF. The SNOT-22 has strong internal consistency in PwCF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Christine M Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jonathan B Overdevest
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Anna Zemke
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Aastha Khatiwada
- Department of Biostatistics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - David A Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Jessa E Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Adam Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jeremy P Tervo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Emily DiMango
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Jennifer L Goralski
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Claire Keating
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Brent Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Amanda L Stapleton
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Patricia H Eshaghian
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jess C Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Karolin Markarian
- CTSI, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A
| | - Todd E Bodner
- Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt Health, Nashville, Tennessee, U.S.A
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Ashoke Khanwalker
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Jivianne T Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Douglas A Li
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Meghan Norris
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Jayakar V Nayak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Cameran Owens
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Katie Poch
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Greenville, South Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A
| | - Jeffrey D Suh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Grant A Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, U.S.A
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A
| | - Milene T Saavedra
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A
| | - Jennifer L Taylor Cousar
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ, Gutierrez J, Mace JC, Smith TL, Bodner TE, Khan S, Mulligan JK, Mattos JL, Alt JA, Ramakrishnan VR, Soler ZM. All chronic rhinosinusitis endotype clusters demonstrate improvement in patient-reported and clinical outcome measures after endoscopic sinus surgery. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:765-774. [PMID: 37563836 PMCID: PMC10858289 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is unclear whether chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) endotypes show a differential response to endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). We explored patient mucous inflammatory cytokine expression and associations with patient-reported and clinically measured post-operative outcome measures. METHODS Patients with CRS were prospectively recruited between 2016 and 2021 into a national multicenter, observational study. Mucus was collected from the olfactory cleft preoperatively and evaluated for 26 biomarkers using cluster analysis. Patient-reported outcome measures included the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Questionnaire of Olfactory Dysfunction (QOD). Additional clinical measures of disease severity included threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) scores using "Sniffin' Sticks" testing and Lund-Kennedy endoscopic score (LKES). RESULTS A total of 115 patients were clustered into type 2 inflammatory, non-type 2 inflammatory, noninflammatory, and two indeterminate clusters based on individual protein levels. Overall, the type 2 inflammatory cluster was found to have the highest mean improvement in both SNOT-22 (-28.3 [standard deviation, ±16.2]) and TDI (6.5 [standard deviation, ±7.9]) scores 6 months after ESS. However, on average, all endotype clusters demonstrated improvement in all outcome measures after ESS without statistically significant between-group differences in SNOT-22 (p = 0.738), QOD (p = 0.306), TDI (p = 0.358), or LKES (p = 0.514) measures. CONCLUSIONS All CRS endotype clusters responded favorably to surgery and showed improvements in patient-reported and objective outcome measures. Thus, ESS should be considered a more generalized CRS therapy, and benefits appear to not be limited to specific endotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Chapurin
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jorge Gutierrez
- Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jess C Mace
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus/Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Timothy L. Smith
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus/Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Todd E Bodner
- Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sofia Khan
- Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer K. Mulligan
- Division of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Jose L. Mattos
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Jeremiah A. Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vijay R. Ramakrishnan
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Zachary M. Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Beswick DM, Han EJ, Mace JC, Markarian K, Alt JA, Bodner TE, Chowdhury NI, Eshaghian PH, Getz AE, Hwang PH, Khanwalkar A, Kimple AJ, Lee JT, Li DA, Norris M, Nayak JV, Owens C, Patel Z, Poch K, Schlosser RJ, Smith KA, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Suh JD, Turner G, Wang MB, Taylor-Cousar JL, Saavedra M. Factors that predict pursuing sinus surgery in the era of highly effective modulator therapy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:807-818. [PMID: 37725072 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains unresolved for many people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). While highly effective modulator therapy improves quality-of-life and symptom severity, the impact of this intervention and other factors associated with pursuing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) remains understudied. METHODS Adult PwCF + CRS were enrolled into a prospective, observational, multi-institutional study. Participants completed validated outcome measures to evaluate respiratory symptom severity, depression, headache, and sleep quality, as well as nasal endoscopy, sinus computed tomography (CT), and olfactory testing. Bivariate comparisons and regression modeling evaluated treatment cofactors, disease characteristics, and outcome measures associated with pursuing ESS. RESULTS Sixty PwCF were analyzed, including 24 (40%) who elected ESS. Pursuing ESS was associated with worse SinoNasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) total, rhinologic, psychological, and sleep dysfunction domain scores; worse Patient Health Questionnaire-9-Revised depression scores; worse Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index total scores; worse weight, role, emotion, and eating domain scores on the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised; more severe disease on nasal endoscopy; and lack of modulator therapy (all p < 0.050). Multivariable regression identified that worse SNOT-22 total score was associated with electing ESS (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.16, p = 0.015) and elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) treatment (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.004-0.34, p = 0.004) was associated with pursing medical therapy. CONCLUSIONS Worse sinonasal symptom burden, lack of ETI treatment, sleep quality, depression, and nasal endoscopy scores were associated with electing ESS, while lung disease severity and sinus CT scores were not. ETI use was associated with lower odds of pursuing ESS independent of sinonasal symptom burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Ethan J Han
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jess C Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Karolin Markarian
- CTSI, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Todd E Bodner
- Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Patricia H Eshaghian
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ashoke Khanwalkar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jivianne T Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Douglas A Li
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Norris
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jayakar V Nayak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Cameran Owens
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Colorado, Denver, USA
| | - Zara Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Katie Poch
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Suh
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Grant Turner
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Milene Saavedra
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Chandra RK, Davis GE, Mahdavinia M, Messina J, Ow RA, Patel ZM, Peters AT, Sacks H, Schlosser RJ, Sindwani R, Soler ZM, White AA, Wise SK, Mahmoud RA. Efficacy of EDS-FLU for Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Two Randomized Controlled Trials (ReOpen1 and ReOpen2). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2024; 12:1049-1061. [PMID: 38244014 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a prevalent inflammatory disease. No medications are Food and Drug Administration-approved for the most common form, CRS without nasal polyps (also called "chronic sinusitis"). Novel biomechanics of the exhalation delivery system deliver fluticasone (EDS-FLU; XHANCE) to sinonasal areas above the inferior turbinate, especially sinus drainage pathways not reached by standard-delivery nasal sprays. OBJECTIVE Assess EDS-FLU efficacy for CRS (irrespective of nasal polyps). METHODS Two randomized, EDS-placebo-controlled trials in adults with CRS irrespective of polyps (ReOpen1) or exclusively without polyps (ReOpen2) were conducted at 120 sites in 13 countries. Patients received EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril, or EDS-placebo, twice daily for 24 weeks. Coprimary measures were composite symptom score through week 4 and ethmoid/maxillary sinus percent opacification by computed tomography at week 24. RESULTS ReOpen1 (N = 332) composite symptom score least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -1.58 and -1.60 versus -0.62 (P < .001, P < .001); ReOpen2 (N = 223), -1.54 and -1.74 versus -0.81 (P = .011, P = .001). In ReOpen1, sinus opacification least-squares mean change for EDS-FLU 1 or 2 sprays/nostril versus EDS-placebo was -5.58 and -6.20 versus -1.60 (P = .045, P = .018), and in ReOpen2, -7.00 and -5.14 versus +1.19 (P < .001, P = .009). Acute disease exacerbations were reduced by 56% to 66% with EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo (P = .001). There were significant, and similar magnitude, symptom reductions in patients using standard-delivery nasal steroid products just before entering the study (P < .001). Adverse events were similar to standard-delivery intranasal steroids. CONCLUSIONS EDS-FLU is the first nonsurgical treatment demonstrated to reduce symptoms, intrasinus opacification, and exacerbations in replicate randomized clinical trials in CRS, regardless of polyp status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James N Palmer
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa.
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa
| | | | | | | | | | - Randall A Ow
- Sacramento Ear Nose Throat Medical & Surgical Group, Roseville, Calif
| | - Zara M Patel
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif
| | - Anju T Peters
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sarah K Wise
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rathi VK, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ, Workman AD, Chapurin N, Rowan NR, Dusetzina SB. The Inflation Reduction Act: Implications for Medicare spending and access to biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and asthma. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024. [PMID: 38465800 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024]
Abstract
KEY POINTS In 2021, Medicare spending on biologics was $926 million in Part B (FFS) and $1.3 billion in Part D (FFS/MA). Between 2017 and 2021, annual Medicare spending on biologics increased by approximately 200%. Between 2023 and 2025, Medicare Part D OOP costs for biologics will decrease by an estimated 50%-60%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay K Rathi
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Alan D Workman
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Nicholas R Rowan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Stacie B Dusetzina
- Department of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gutierrez JA, Barth JL, Schlosser RJ, Edwards TS, Smith TL, Soler ZM. Utilization of RNA sequencing to investigate olfactory dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps: A pilot study. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 10:29-36. [PMID: 38560035 PMCID: PMC10979044 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives Prior research on olfactory dysfunction in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has focused on patients with polyps and suggests that direct inflammation of the olfactory cleft mucosa plays a contributory role. The purpose of this study was to evaluate gene expression in superior turbinate mucosal specimens, comparing normosmic and dysosmic CRS patients without polyps (CRSsNP). Methods Tissue samples were obtained from the superior turbinates of patients with CRSsNP at the time of endoscopic sinus surgery. Samples subsequently underwent RNA sequencing and functional analysis to investigate biological pathways associated with differentially expressed genes between dysosmic (n = 7) and normosmic (n = 4) patients. Results Differential gene expression analysis comparing dysosmic and normosmic CRSsNP patients showed upregulation of 563 genes and downregulation of 327 genes. Using stringent criteria for multiple comparisons, one upregulated gene (Immediate Early Response 3 [IER3]) had an false discovery rate (FDR) correction adjusted P value considered statistically significant (P < 0.001, fold change 2.69). Reactome functional analysis revealed eight biological pathways significantly different between dysosmic and normosmic patients (P < 0.05, FDR correction) including IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, IL-10 signaling, and rhodopsin-like receptors. Conclusions RNA sequencing of the superior turbinates in patients with CRSsNP can provide valuable information regarding biological pathways and genes involved in olfactory dysfunction. This study supports literature suggesting that Type 2 inflammation may play a role in olfactory dysfunction in at least some patients with CRSsNP. This study also prompts questions regarding the role of IL-10, rhodopsin-like receptors, and IER3 in the pathogenesis of olfactory dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A. Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jeremy L. Barth
- Department of Regenerative Medicine & Cell BiologyMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Thomas S. Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Timothy L. Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| | - Zachary M. Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen T, Poupore NS, Shih MC, Edwards TS, Nguyen SA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. Comparison of trigeminal lateralization with differing stimulants. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 10:66-69. [PMID: 38560039 PMCID: PMC10979039 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Trigeminal-specific stimulants have been shown to activate different receptors preferentially and this likely accounts for variation in sensory perception. It is unclear whether trigeminal sensitivity is similar across different transient receptor potential (TRP) receptors or if dysfunction of different receptors results in differing patient symptoms. Therefore, a prospective cohort study was conducted, consisting of trigeminal lateralization testing with three different stimulants (eucalyptol, isothiocyanate, acetic acid), olfaction testing with Sniffin' Sticks, and measurement of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A total of 50 participants were enrolled across the olfactory spectrum. Mean TDI score was 27.1 ± 8.3 (range 7.0-39.5) with 38% normosmic and 62% dysosmic. Mean trigeminal lateralization scores out of 20 in the overall cohort were 16.18 (2.78) for eucalyptol, 14.94 (3.49) for mustard oil, and 15.28 (3.68) for vinegar. Eucalyptol showed a significant correlation with threshold scores of Sniffin' Sticks. A significant correlation was found between acetic acid and various PROMs. None of the lateralization scores of the trigeminal stimulants correlated to each other significantly and there was no correlation to age. The lack of correlation suggests that the measured sensitivity of one type of TRP receptor may not translate to similar sensitivity of the other receptors. Additional investigations with TRPV1 and TRPA1 agonists are needed to corroborate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Nicolas S. Poupore
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Michael C. Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Thomas S. Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Zachary M. Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pipaliya RM, Duckett KA, Monaghan NP, Miller EM, Young G, Brennan EA, Nguyen SA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. The placebo effect in randomized-controlled trials of medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:695-710. [PMID: 37985206 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The placebo effect observed in clinical trials evaluating medical treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is not well understood. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to characterize the placebo effect present within CRS outcomes. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Nursing (CINAHL) was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating medical treatments for CRS versus placebo were included. We assessed patient-reported (sino-nasal outcome test 22 [SNOT-22], nasal obstruction, sense of smell, nasal obstruction visual analogue score [VAS], sense of smell VAS, anterior rhinorrhea, and postnasal drip) and objective (Lund-Mackay Computed tomography (CT) score, peak nasal inspiratory flow [PNIF], nasal polyp scores, 40-item Smell Identification Test, serum IgE, and blood eosinophil levels) outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-one RCTs were included, comprising 1437 patients (mean age 49.2 years). Biologics were the most common treatment investigated (n = 9). Eleven studies administered background steroids along with placebo. Following placebo administration, multiple patient-reported outcomes significantly decreased, including SNOT-22 (mean difference -9.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-11.26, -7.73]), nasal obstruction (-0.33 [-0.54, -0.13]), sense of smell (-0.22 [-0.33, -0.11]), nasal obstruction VAS (-2.47 [-2.87, -2.06]), and loss of smell VAS (-2.31 [-4.14, -0.47]) scores. For objective measures, significant changes occurred in Lund-Mackay CT score (-0.82, [-1.48, -0.16]) and PNIF (4.70, [4.76, 24.64]) with placebo. Placebo arms had the greatest impact when no background medications were used. CONCLUSIONS Placebo treatments have a statistically and potentially clinically significant effect on patient-reported and some objective CRS outcomes. Further investigation is required to fully understand placebo effect, which could improve assessment of RCTs and impact patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Royal M Pipaliya
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kelsey A Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Neil P Monaghan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Emma Marin Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gabrielle Young
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Emily A Brennan
- MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sutton SR, Taniguchi AN, Nguyen SA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. Direct impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rhinology practice. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:738-740. [PMID: 37482946 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
KEY POINTS The pandemic caused an increase in computed tomography imaging in patients with sinusitis, which persisted post-COVID. Nasal endoscopies significantly decreased during COVID but returned to pre-COVID levels in 2022. The management of cerebrospinal fluid leaks, tumors, and orbital pathology was not impacted by the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Sutton
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Reno School of Medicine, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA
| | - April N Taniguchi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gutierrez JA, Khan S, Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM. Factors Impacting Follow-Up Care in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:577-585. [PMID: 37925622 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to analyze barriers to medical care and follow-up in patients with allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional questionnaire-based study with retrospective chart review. SETTING Tertiary Medical Center. METHODS Subjects with AFRS and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) were prospectively recruited for completion of the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ) and formal chart review. RESULTS Fifty-nine AFRS and 51 CRSwNP patients participated. AFRS patients were more likely to be lost to follow-up within 6 months of surgery (35.6% vs 17.7%, P = 0.04) and no-show at least 1 appointment (20.3% vs 5.9%, P = 0.03) compared to CRSwNP patients. Men with AFRS were more likely to have only a single follow-up visit (37.0% vs 3.1%, P < 0.001) and be lost to follow-up (66.7% vs 9.4%, P < 0.001) than women. There were no significant differences in the BCQ between groups; however, rate of questionnaire completion was lower in the AFRS group than the CRS group (62.7% vs 80.4%, P = 0.042). AFRS patients who did not complete the BCQ were more likely to be male (63.6% vs 35.1%, P = 0.034), lost to follow-up (77.3% vs 10.8%, P < 0.0001), and have a single follow-up visit (40.9% vs 5.4%, P < 0.0001). Younger age was associated with increased likelihood of having a single follow-up visit (odds ratio 1.143, 95% CI 1.022-1.276). CONCLUSION Young, male AFRS patients are more frequently lost to follow-up after surgery and less likely to complete questionnaires assessing barriers to care. Further investigation is needed to assess barriers to follow-up in these at-risk groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sofia Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kuan EC, Wang EW, Adappa ND, Beswick DM, London NR, Su SY, Wang MB, Abuzeid WM, Alexiev B, Alt JA, Antognoni P, Alonso-Basanta M, Batra PS, Bhayani M, Bell D, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Betz CS, Blay JY, Bleier BS, Bonilla-Velez J, Callejas C, Carrau RL, Casiano RR, Castelnuovo P, Chandra RK, Chatzinakis V, Chen SB, Chiu AG, Choby G, Chowdhury NI, Citardi MJ, Cohen MA, Dagan R, Dalfino G, Dallan I, Dassi CS, de Almeida J, Dei Tos AP, DelGaudio JM, Ebert CS, El-Sayed IH, Eloy JA, Evans JJ, Fang CH, Farrell NF, Ferrari M, Fischbein N, Folbe A, Fokkens WJ, Fox MG, Lund VJ, Gallia GL, Gardner PA, Geltzeiler M, Georgalas C, Getz AE, Govindaraj S, Gray ST, Grayson JW, Gross BA, Grube JG, Guo R, Ha PK, Halderman AA, Hanna EY, Harvey RJ, Hernandez SC, Holtzman AL, Hopkins C, Huang Z, Huang Z, Humphreys IM, Hwang PH, Iloreta AM, Ishii M, Ivan ME, Jafari A, Kennedy DW, Khan M, Kimple AJ, Kingdom TT, Knisely A, Kuo YJ, Lal D, Lamarre ED, Lan MY, Le H, Lechner M, Lee NY, Lee JK, Lee VH, Levine CG, Lin JC, Lin DT, Lobo BC, Locke T, Luong AU, Magliocca KR, Markovic SN, Matnjani G, McKean EL, Meço C, Mendenhall WM, Michel L, Na'ara S, Nicolai P, Nuss DW, Nyquist GG, Oakley GM, Omura K, Orlandi RR, Otori N, Papagiannopoulos P, Patel ZM, Pfister DG, Phan J, Psaltis AJ, Rabinowitz MR, Ramanathan M, Rimmer R, Rosen MR, Sanusi O, Sargi ZB, Schafhausen P, Schlosser RJ, Sedaghat AR, Senior BA, Shrivastava R, Sindwani R, Smith TL, Smith KA, Snyderman CH, Solares CA, Sreenath SB, Stamm A, Stölzel K, Sumer B, Surda P, Tajudeen BA, Thompson LDR, Thorp BD, Tong CCL, Tsang RK, Turner JH, Turri-Zanoni M, Udager AM, van Zele T, VanKoevering K, Welch KC, Wise SK, Witterick IJ, Won TB, Wong SN, Woodworth BA, Wormald PJ, Yao WC, Yeh CF, Zhou B, Palmer JN. International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:149-608. [PMID: 37658764 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field. METHODS In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication. RESULTS The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention. CONCLUSION As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward C Kuan
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nyall R London
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Sinonasal and Skull Base Tumor Program, Surgical Oncology Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Shirley Y Su
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Waleed M Abuzeid
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Borislav Alexiev
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Paolo Antognoni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pete S Batra
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mihir Bhayani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Diana Bell
- Department of Pathology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Manuel Bernal-Sprekelsen
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christian S Betz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jean-Yves Blay
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, UNICANCER, Université Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Benjamin S Bleier
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Juliana Bonilla-Velez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Claudio Callejas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Ricardo L Carrau
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Roy R Casiano
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Paolo Castelnuovo
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Rakesh K Chandra
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Simon B Chen
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alexander G Chiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Martin J Citardi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marc A Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roi Dagan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Gianluca Dalfino
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Iacopo Dallan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - John de Almeida
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Angelo P Dei Tos
- Section of Pathology, Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - John M DelGaudio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ivan H El-Sayed
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | - James J Evans
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christina H Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, The University Hospital for Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Nyssa F Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Marco Ferrari
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Nancy Fischbein
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Adam Folbe
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA
| | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Meha G Fox
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gary L Gallia
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Christos Georgalas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Satish Govindaraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jessica W Grayson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Bradley A Gross
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jordon G Grube
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Ruifeng Guo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Patrick K Ha
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Ashleigh A Halderman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ehab Y Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen C Hernandez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Zhigang Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenxiao Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Ian M Humphreys
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Alfred M Iloreta
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Masaru Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Aria Jafari
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - David W Kennedy
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mohemmed Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Todd T Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Anna Knisely
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Ying-Ju Kuo
- Department of Pathology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Devyani Lal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ming-Ying Lan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matt Lechner
- UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jivianne K Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Victor H Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Corinna G Levine
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jin-Ching Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Derrick T Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Tran Locke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amber U Luong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly R Magliocca
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Gesa Matnjani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Erin L McKean
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Cem Meço
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Loren Michel
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shorook Na'ara
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Piero Nicolai
- Section of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Daniel W Nuss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Gurston G Nyquist
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gretchen M Oakley
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kazuhiro Omura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Richard R Orlandi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Nobuyoshi Otori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Peter Papagiannopoulos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - David G Pfister
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack Phan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mindy R Rabinowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Murugappan Ramanathan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Marc R Rosen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zoukaa B Sargi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Philippe Schafhausen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Raj Shrivastava
- Department of Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Raj Sindwani
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- Departments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - C Arturo Solares
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Satyan B Sreenath
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Aldo Stamm
- São Paulo ENT Center (COF), Edmundo Vasconcelos Complex, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Katharina Stölzel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Baran Sumer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pavol Surda
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Brian D Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charles C L Tong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Raymond K Tsang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Justin H Turner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mario Turri-Zanoni
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Biotechnology and Life Sciences, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi Hospital, Varese, Italy
| | - Aaron M Udager
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Thibaut van Zele
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kyle VanKoevering
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kevin C Welch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Ian J Witterick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Bin Won
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Stephanie N Wong
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Medicine, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Peter-John Wormald
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - William C Yao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chien-Fu Yeh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rathi VK, Sawicki NW, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM, Scangas GA, Workman AD, Gray ST. Adverse events associated with budesonide nasal irrigation reported to the US Food and Drug Administration: 2007 to 2022. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:123-126. [PMID: 37394843 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023]
Abstract
KEYPOINTS Between 2007 and 2022, the FDA received 119 US-based reports mentioning budesonide nasal irrigation. Most reports were submitted by patients and alerted FDA to off-label usage of budesonide. Notable adverse events reported to the FDA included headache, dyspnea, and blurred vision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinay K Rathi
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | | | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - George A Scangas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical, School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan D Workman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical, School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical, School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gutierrez JA, Shannon CM, Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM. Challenges to medication adherence with intranasal corticosteroid irrigations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2024; 14:32-40. [PMID: 37314391 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate real-world adherence to intranasal corticosteroid irrigations using pharmacy data and assess factors associated with low adherence. METHODS Patients undergoing treatment with corticosteroid irrigations for any diagnosis during a 2-year period were prospectively recruited. Subjects completed a one-time set of questionnaires including the Barriers to Care Questionnaire (BCQ), 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), and a questionnaire assessing their experience with corticosteroid irrigations. Pharmacy data was used to calculate the medication possession ratio (MPR), a measure of medication adherence graded from 0 to 1. RESULTS Seventy-one patients were enrolled. Patient diagnoses included chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) without nasal polyps (n = 37), CRS with nasal polyps (n = 24), or a non-CRS diagnosis, most commonly chronic rhinitis (n = 10). The MPR for the overall group was 0.44 ± 0.33. Just 9.9% of patients had a perfect MPR of 1. Despite low MPR, only 19.7% of patients reported problems taking the medication when directly asked. Lower education resulted in lower MPR (unstandardized B = 0.065, p = 0.046). Increasing BCQ score, indicating higher barriers to care, was associated with lower MPR (unstandardized B = -0.010, p = 0.033). The lower the MPR, the worse the patient SNOT-22 scores (unstandardized B = -15.980, p = 0.036). CONCLUSION Adherence to corticosteroid irrigations was low and patients underreported issues with their medication. Education and barriers to care were associated with lower adherence, which, in turn, was associated with worse sinonasal quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Christian M Shannon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miller JE, Taylor-Cousar JL, Overdevest JB, Khatiwada A, Mace JC, Alt JA, Bodner TE, Chowdhury NI, DiMango EA, Eshaghian PH, Getz AE, Gudis DA, Han EJ, Hwang PH, Keating CL, Khanwalkar A, Kimple AJ, Lee JT, Li D, Markarian K, Norris M, Nayak JV, Owens C, Patel ZM, Poch K, Schlosser RJ, Smith KA, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Suh JD, Tervo JP, Turner GA, Wang MB, Saavedra MT, Beswick DM. Determining the minimal clinically important difference for the questionnaire of olfactory disorders in people with cystic fibrosis and factors associated with improvement after highly effective modulator therapy. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023. [PMID: 38145393 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Olfactory dysfunction (OD) is common among people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). The Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders (QOD) is a validated instrument that evaluates olfactory-specific quality-of-life. The QOD minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and factors associated with olfactory improvement after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor have not been determined for PwCF. METHODS Prospective observational data were pooled from three studies that enrolled adult PwCF with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). QOD scores and disease characteristics were assessed. To evaluate internal consistency and calculate the QOD MCID, Cronbach's alpha and four distribution-based methods were employed. For participants who enrolled prior to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD scores were obtained at baseline and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors associated with QOD improvement. RESULTS Of 129 PwCF included, 65 had QOD scores before and 3-6 months after starting elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor. Mean baseline QOD score was 6.5 ± 7.9. Mean Cronbach's alpha was ≥0.85. The MCID estimates were as follows: Cohen's effect size = 1.6, standard error of measurement = 2.5, ½ baseline standard deviation = 4.0, and minimal detectable change = 6.9. Mean MCID was 3.7. Of those with pre/post elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor QOD scores, the mean change in QOD was -1.3 ± 5.4. After elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, QOD improvement surpassed the MCID in 22% of participants (14/65). Worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps were associated with improved QOD scores after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (both p < 0.04). CONCLUSION The QOD MCID in PwCF was estimated to be 3.7. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor led to qualitative but not clinically meaningful improvements in QOD score for most PwCF; PwCF with worse baseline QOD scores and nasal polyps improved in a clinically significant manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessa E Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jennifer L Taylor-Cousar
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Jonathan B Overdevest
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Aastha Khatiwada
- Department of Biostatistics, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Jess C Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Todd E Bodner
- Department of Psychology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Naweed I Chowdhury
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt Health, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Emily A DiMango
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Patricia H Eshaghian
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anne E Getz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David A Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ethan J Han
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Peter H Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Claire L Keating
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ashoke Khanwalkar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jivianne T Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Douglas Li
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Karolin Markarian
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, CTSI, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Meghan Norris
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jayakar V Nayak
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Cameran Owens
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Zara M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Katie Poch
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jeffrey D Suh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jeremy P Tervo
- Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Grant A Turner
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marilene B Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Milene T Saavedra
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shih MC, Edwards TS, Snyder J, Germroth M, Nguyen SA, Schlosser RJ. Impact of Nasal Cavity CT Opacification Upon Sinonasal Quality of Life. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1590-1599. [PMID: 37246346 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231176329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current methods of quantifying inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) on computed tomography (CT) imaging focus on opacification of the paranasal sinuses and show limited correlation with patient-reported outcome measures. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to determine if quantifying CT opacification of the nasal cavity correlated with Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test scores (SNOT-22). METHODS Thirty patients with CRS were enrolled. Lund-Mackay and SNOT-22 scores were measured. Nasal cavity regions of interest (ROIs) were measured by 2 independent raters using ImageJ at 3 points on coronal CT scans: anteriorly at the lacrimal duct, at the approximate midpoint demarcated by the posterior aspect of the globe, and posteriorly at the transition from the hard to soft palate. Superior and inferior regions were defined based upon the root of the inferior turbinate. Percent opacification was calculated for each ROI. Analyses were conducted bilaterally and for the side with greater opacification (worse side). RESULTS Interrater reliability was strong for all ROIs. Lund-Mackay scores correlated with nasal blockage only (r = .495, P = .01) and did not correlate with nasal cavity ROI opacification. Inferior nasal cavity opacification for worse-sided anterior ROI and middle ROI correlated with SNOT-22 scores for nasal blockage (anterior r = .41, P = .03) (middle r = .42, P = .023) and runny nose (anterior r = .44, P = .02) (middle r = .38, P = .04). Posterior ROIs did not correlate with SNOT-22. CONCLUSIONS Traditional CT scoring of sinus opacification does not correlate well with nasal cavity opacification or SNOT-22. Inferior nasal cavity inflammation provides unique correlations with SNOT-22 nasal questions and may guide targeted interventions in these regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Thomas S Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jacob Snyder
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Matthew Germroth
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sedaghat AR, Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hellings PW, Kern RC, Reitsma S, Toppila-Salmi S, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Mullol J, Gevaert P, Teeling T, Alobid I, Anselmo-Lima WT, Baroody FM, Cervin A, Cohen NA, Constantinidis J, De Gabory L, Desrosiers M, Harvey RJ, Kalogjera L, Knill A, Landis BN, Meco C, Philpott CM, Ryan D, Schlosser RJ, Senior BA, Smith TL, Tomazic PV, Zhang L, Hopkins C. Consensus criteria for chronic rhinosinusitis disease control: an international Delphi Study. Rhinology 2023; 61:519-530. [PMID: 37804121 DOI: 10.4193/rhin23.335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) disease control is a global metric of disease status for CRS. While there is broad acceptance that it is an important treatment goal, there has been inconsistency in the criteria used to define CRS control. The objective of this study was to identify and develop consensus around essential criteria for assessment of CRS disease control. METHODS Modified Delphi methodology consisting of three rounds to review a list of 24 possible CRS control criteria developed by a 12-person steering committee. The core authorship of the multidisciplinary EPOS 2020 guidelines was invited to participate. RESULTS Thirty-two individuals accepted the invitation to participate and there was no dropout of participants throughout the entire study (3 rounds). Consensus essential criteria for assessment of CRS control were: overall symptom severity, need for CRS-related systemic corticosteroids in the prior 6 months, severity of nasal obstruction, and patient-reported CRS control. Near-consensus items were: nasal endoscopy findings, severity of smell loss, overall quality of life, impairment of normal activities and severity of nasal discharge. Participants’ comments provided insights into caveats of, and disagreements related to, near-consensus items. CONCLUSIONS Overall symptom severity, use of CRS-related systemic corticosteroids, severity of nasal obstruction, and patient-reported CRS control are widely agreed upon essential criteria for assessment of CRS disease control. Consideration of near-consensus items to assess CRS control should be implemented with their intrinsic caveats in mind. These identified consensus CRS control criteria, together with evidence-based support, will provide a foundation upon which CRS control criteria with wide-spread acceptance can be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Sedaghat
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - W J Fokkens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - V J Lund
- Royal National ENT Hospital, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P W Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - R C Kern
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - S Reitsma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Toppila-Salmi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Finland and Department of Allergy, Inflammation Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - J Mullol
- Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clinic, FRCB-IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERES, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - P Gevaert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - T Teeling
- Patient representative, Task Force Healthcare, WTC Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - I Alobid
- Rhinology and Skull Base Unit, ENT Department, Hospital Clinic, Universitat de Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, CIBERES, Barcelona, Spain
| | - W T Anselmo-Lima
- Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirao Preto Medical School-University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - F M Baroody
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and the Comer Children’s Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - A Cervin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia and Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - N A Cohen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine at The University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J Constantinidis
- 1st Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Aristotle University, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - L De Gabory
- Rhinology and Plastic Surgery Unit, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Pediatric ENT Department, CHU ux, Hospital Pellegrin, Centre F-X Michelet, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Desrosiers
- Department of ORL-HNS, Universitat de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - R J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base Department, Applied Medical Research Centre, UNSW (Conjoint) and Macquarie University (Clinical), Sydney, Australia
| | - L Kalogjera
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Zagreb School of Medicine; University Hospital Center, Sestre milosrdnice,Zagreb, Croatia
| | - A Knill
- Patient representative, Sinus UK, London, UK
| | - B N Landis
- Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Meco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Salzburg Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - C M Philpott
- Rhinology and ENT Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK and Norfolk and Waveney ENT Service, James Paget University Hospital, Great Yarmouth and Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK
| | - D Ryan
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Group, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK and International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - R J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - B A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - T L Smith
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health
| | - P V Tomazic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - L Zhang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China and Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China and Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Ministry of Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China and Research Unit of Diagnosis and T
| | - C Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, Guys and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Munhall CC, Shah S, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Schlosser RJ, White DR. Otolaryngologic Presentations to Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1467-1476. [PMID: 37016555 PMCID: PMC10076161 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231165575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a systematic review of otolaryngologic presentation rates to emergency department settings before and after lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic. SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. METHODS A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) for studies describing otolaryngologic presentations to emergency department and rapid access clinic settings both in the before-lockdown and after-lockdown periods. The start of after-lockdown period varied based on initiation of lockdown, ranging from March 1st to June 1st of 2020 across general emergency department studies. RESULTS A total of 14 studies were included in this review. About 10 were general emergency departments, 3 were specifically pediatric emergency departments, and 1 study focused on the geriatric population (>65 years). A total of 13 790 patients were included, with 9446 in the before-lockdown period (68.5%) and 4344 in the after-lockdown period (31.5%). Meta-analysis of proportions for otolaryngologic presentations across general emergency departments was performed. Comparison of weighted proportions found significant differences between before-lockdown and after-lockdown presentation rates for infectious etiologies, tonsillitis specifically, foreign bodies, non-infectious airway issues, and epistaxis among these studies. CONCLUSIONS The increased proportions of various non-infectious presentations (eg, epistaxis, foreign bodies, and airway issues) following lockdown might be associated with proportional decreases in infectious pathologies, given decreased social contact to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Overall, it is important for otolaryngologists to recognize what presentations might more commonly be seen and require evaluation and potential intervention in light of a global pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher C. Munhall
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Sunny Shah
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ted A. Meyer
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - David R. White
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and
Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dattilo LW, Rathi VK, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM, Scangas GA, Workman AD, Gray ST. Trends in price, spending, and utilization of omalizumab among Medicare beneficiaries. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:2105-2108. [PMID: 37199046 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
KEY POINTS Between January 2005 and January 2023, the average selling price of omalizumab increased by nearly 60%. Between 2016 and 2021, Medicare Part B and D spending on omalizumab totaled over $3.7 billion. Between 2016 and 2021, Medicare Part B and D utilization of omalizumab increased by approximately 30%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lillian W Dattilo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Vinay K Rathi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - George A Scangas
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alan D Workman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Stacey T Gray
- Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Gutierrez JA, Durrant FG, Nguyen SA, Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM. Association between Social Determinants of Health and Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1101-1113. [PMID: 37293865 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Some previous studies have shown an increased prevalence of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) among young, black patients with poor access to health care; however, results have been mixed. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between social determinants of health and AFRS. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS A systematic review was performed searching for articles published from date of inception to September 29, 2022. English language articles describing the relationship between social determinants of health (i.e., race, insurance status) and AFRS as compared to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) were selected for inclusion. A Meta-analysis of proportions with comparison (Δ) of weighted proportions was conducted. RESULTS A total of 21 articles with 1605 patients were selected for inclusion. The proportion of black patients among AFRS, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), and chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) groups was 58.0% [45.3%-70.1%], 23.8% [14.1%-35.2%], and 13.0% [5.1%-24.0%], respectively. This was significantly higher among the AFRS population compared to both the CRSwNP population (Δ34.2% [28.4%-39.6%], p < .0001) and the CRSsNP population (Δ44.9% [38.4%-50.6%], p < .0001). The proportion of patients who were either uninsured or covered by Medicaid among the AFRS, CRSwNP, and CRSsNP populations was 31.5% [25.4%-38.1%], 8.6% [0.7%-23.8%], and 5.0% [0.3%-14.8%], respectively. This was significantly higher among the AFRS group than the CRSwNP group (Δ22.9% [15.3%-31.1%], p < .0001) and the CRSsNP group (Δ26.5% [19.1%-33.4%], p < .0001). CONCLUSION This study confirms that AFRS patients are more likely to be Black and either uninsured or on subsidized insurance than their CRS counterparts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Frederick G Durrant
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Khan S, Gutierrez JA, Chapurin N, Nguyen SA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. The impact of race on olfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:2063-2072. [PMID: 37183309 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many studies have identified a higher degree of Olfactory Dysfunction (OD) in Black patients compared to White patients. This study aims to analyze olfactory outcomes in different races. METHODS The PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception to September 5, 2022, for English-language articles documenting self-reported and psychophysical OD stratified by race. A meta-analysis of proportions, comparison of weighted proportions, and comparison of means were performed in MedCalc 20.218. In the quantitative analysis, 79,297 patients were included, comprising 79.3% Whites, 16.1% Blacks, and 4.6% Hispanics. RESULTS A total of 14 studies were meta-analyzed. The prevalence of self-reported OD in Hispanic, White, and Black patients was 19.5% (95% CI, 16.6% to 22.6%), 17.2% (95% CI, 10.5% to 25.0%), and 13.9% (95% CI, 9.3% to 19.2%), respectively (p < 0.0007). The prevalence of psychophysical OD in Black, White, and Hispanic patients was 30.3% (95% CI, 24.2% to 36.9%), 24.2% (95% CI, 20.1% to 28.5%), and 18.4% (95% CI, 16.3% to 20.7%), respectively (p < 0.0001). Blacks reported a greater extent of unrecognized OD compared to Whites, with a difference of 16.5% (95% CI, 15.0% to 17.9%) versus 5.8% (95% CI, 3.4% to 8.0%), respectively (p < 0.0001). Hispanic rates of self-reported OD and psychophysical OD were not statistically different. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that Blacks have the highest rate of psychophysical OD and are more likely to underreport their awareness compared to Whites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Khan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jorge A Gutierrez
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Whitcroft KL, Altundag A, Balungwe P, Boscolo-Rizzo P, Douglas R, Enecilla MLB, Fjaeldstad AW, Fornazieri MA, Frasnelli J, Gane S, Gudziol H, Gupta N, Haehner A, Hernandez AK, Holbrook EH, Hopkins C, Hsieh JW, Huart C, Husain S, Kamel R, Kim JK, Kobayashi M, Konstantinidis I, Landis BN, Lechner M, Macchi A, Mazal PP, Miri I, Miwa T, Mori E, Mullol J, Mueller CA, Ottaviano G, Patel ZM, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Ramakrishnan VR, Roth Y, Schlosser RJ, Stjärne P, Van Gerven L, Vodicka J, Welge-Luessen A, Wormald PJ, Hummel T. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023. Rhinology 2023; 61:1-108. [PMID: 37454287 DOI: 10.4193/rhin22.483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since publication of the original Position Paper on Olfactory Dysfunction in 2017 (PPOD-17), the personal and societal burden of olfactory disorders has come sharply into focus through the lens of the COVID-19 pandemic. Clinicians, scientists and the public are now more aware of the importance of olfaction, and the impact of its dysfunction on quality of life, nutrition, social relationships and mental health. Accordingly, new basic, translational and clinical research has resulted in significant progress since the PPOD-17. In this updated document, we present and discuss currently available evidence for the diagnosis and management of olfactory dysfunction. Major updates to the current version include, amongst others: new recommendations on olfactory related terminology; new imaging recommendations; new sections on qualitative OD and COVID-19 OD; updated management section. Recommendations were agreed by all co-authors using a modified Delphi process. CONCLUSIONS We have provided an overview of current evidence and expert-agreed recommendations for the definition, investigation, and management of OD. As for our original Position Paper, we hope that this updated document will encourage clinicians and researchers to adopt a common language, and in so doing, increase the methodological quality, consistency, and generalisability of work in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K L Whitcroft
- Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- and UCL Ear Institute, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK
- and The Centre for Olfactory Research and Applications, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, London, UK
| | - A Altundag
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Istanbul Surgery Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - P Balungwe
- Faculté de Médecine, Université Catholique de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
- and Hôpital Provincial Général de Référence de Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - P Boscolo-Rizzo
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, Section of Otolaryngology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - R Douglas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - M L B Enecilla
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, St. Luke's Medical Center, Global City, Philippines
- and Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Asian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa, Philippines
- and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical Center Taguig, Taguig, Philippines
| | - A W Fjaeldstad
- The Centre for Olfactory Research and Applications, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, London, UK
- and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Clinic for Flavour, Balance and Sleep, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Herning, Denmark
- and Department of Clinical Medicine, Flavour Institute, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- and Center for Eudaimonia and Human Flourishing, Linacre College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - M A Fornazieri
- Department of Clinical Surgery, Universidade Estadual de Londrina and Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Londrina, Brazil
| | - J Frasnelli
- Research Chair in Chemosensory Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, QC, Canada
- and Centre for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - S Gane
- The Centre for Olfactory Research and Applications, Institute of Philosophy, School of Advanced Studies, University of London, London, UK
- and Royal National Throat Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH, London
| | - H Gudziol
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - N Gupta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India
| | - A Haehner
- Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - A K Hernandez
- Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- and Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Asian Hospital and Medical Center, Muntinlupa, Philippines
- and Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines - Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - E H Holbrook
- Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - C Hopkins
- Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - J W Hsieh
- Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - C Huart
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
- and Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - S Husain
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - R Kamel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - J K Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Konkuk University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - M Kobayashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan
| | - I Konstantinidis
- Smell and Taste Clinic, Second Academic Otorhinolaryngology Department, Papageorgiou Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - B N Landis
- Rhinology-Olfactology Unit, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Lechner
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK
- and ENT Department, Homerton Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A Macchi
- ENT Clinic, University of Insubria, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | - P P Mazal
- Servicio de Otorrinolaringología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - I Miri
- Service Médecine Physique Réadaptation fonctionnelle, Institut Mohamed Kassab d'Orthopédie, Mannouba, Tunisia
| | - T Miwa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Kahoku, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - E Mori
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University, School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - J Mullol
- Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona
- IDIBAPS
- CIBERES. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - C A Mueller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Ottaviano
- Department of Neurosciences DNS, Otolaryngology Section, University, Padua, Italy
| | - Z M Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - C Philpott
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
- and The Smell and Taste Clinic, James Paget University Hospital, Gorleston, UK
| | - J M Pinto
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine and Biological Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - V R Ramakrishnan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University of School Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Y Roth
- The Institute for Nose and Sinus Therapy and Clinical Investigations, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Tel Aviv University Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Holon, Israel
| | - R J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - P Stjärne
- Section of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - L Van Gerven
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, UZ Leuven, Belgium
- and Department of Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, KU Leuven, Belgium
- and Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Unit, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - J Vodicka
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Pardubice, Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic
| | - A Welge-Luessen
- University Hospital Basel - Otorhinolaryngology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - P J Wormald
- Department of Surgery-Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - T Hummel
- Smell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Durrant FG, Chen T, Poupore NS, Nguyen SA, Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ. Unique Measurements of Intranasal Trigeminal Function: A Pilot Study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1048-1054. [PMID: 37162025 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate novel methods of measuring intranasal trigeminal function and correlate to validated measures of trigeminal function. STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Tertiary medical center. METHODS Forty-one subjects without nasal congestion were assessed. The trigeminal temperature function of the cool/warmth detection threshold and cold/heat pain threshold was measured with the Thermal Sensory Analyzer (TSA) device, as previously validated at buccal mucosa and infraorbital skin. Identical temperature sensory function was assessed at the anterior septum and inferior turbinate. Lateralization of trigeminal odorants eucalyptol, isothiocyanate, and acetic acid was conducted. Visual analog scales (VAS) of trigeminal function were collected. RESULTS Extraoral cheek site and oral site thermal measures were moderately correlated, suggesting consistent assessment of trigeminal function. Nearly all intranasal thermal measures correlated between the septum and turbinate (significant correlations [ρ] ranged from .3 to .8). Oral and extraoral cheek sites had modest correlations to intranasal cold and heat pain (ρ = .4-.5). The oral site had modest correlations of cold and heat detection to intranasal sites, with turbinate appearing to have the most correlations. Isothiocyanate lateralization was the most closely correlated to intranasal thermal scores for cold and heat pain. Turbinate thermal measures had weak correlations with trigeminal VAS scores (ρ = .3-.4). CONCLUSION Intranasal trigeminal measures of thermal function correlate to validated extraoral and intraoral thermal measures. The turbinate appears to have stronger correlations to the septum than found in the mouth and face. TSA testing might provide a rapid, novel method of intranasal trigeminal function assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick G Durrant
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Tiffany Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nicolas S Poupore
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mattos JL, Hasan S, Schlosser RJ, Payne SC, Soler ZM. The association of gustatory dysfunction, olfactory dysfunction, and cognition in older adults. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:1577-1583. [PMID: 36562185 PMCID: PMC10412899 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of gustatory dysfunction (GD) with quality of life (QOL) and cognition in older adults is understudied. Our objective was to study the prevalence of GD in the community and explore impacts and associated factors. METHODS A prospective, multi-institutional, pre-corona virus disease (COVID) cohort of adults aged 50 years and older had smell and taste testing using "Sniffin' Sticks" (TDI) and "Taste Strips." The impact of GD on mood, QOL, and social interaction was assessed through visual analog scales. Subjects completed the Questionnaire of Olfactory Disorders, Patient Health Questionnaire 9, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment, and the DeJong scale of loneliness. RESULTS A total of 48 patients, average age of 54.7 years, were enrolled. Thirty-two percent experienced GD on taste strips, and 62% experienced olfactory dysfunction (OD) on TDI. Almost 30% (29.5%) had both GD and OD. GD and OD correlated with worsened cognitive function on MMSE (r = 0.392 and 0.05, p = 0.018 and 0.003). Subjects with both GD and OD had worse MMSE than either alone (p = 0.003). Dry mouth and difficult chewing correlated with GD (r = -0.37 and -0.31, p = 0.10 and 0.37). Self-reported GD and OD were correlated (r = 0.46, p = 0.001), as were psychophysical GD and OD (r = 0.394, p = 0.008). GD did not correlate with other metrics. CONCLUSION Thirty-two percent of subjects experienced GD on psychophysical testing, yet most are unaware without impacts on daily life. However, GD correlates with worsened cognitive function. Taste testing may play a role in screening of neurocognitive decline, and multisensory dysfunction may indicate of worsened cognitive states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose L Mattos
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Shahzeb Hasan
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Spencer C Payne
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Durrant FG, Salvador C, Chen T, Chapurin N, Schlosser RJ. Role of trigeminal sensation in patients without nasal obstruction: A pilot study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:1812-1816. [PMID: 36654195 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Frederick G Durrant
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Craig Salvador
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
- School of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Tiffany Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Nikita Chapurin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Abstract
This Viewpoint addresses the lack of reimbursement for olfactory testing, which is especially important in a time when the populations of older adults and patients with COVID-19–associated olfactory dysfunction have grown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anirudh Saraswathula
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Nicholas R Rowan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gudis DA, Schlosser RJ, Hopkins C, Bachert C, Toskala E, Wise SK. Allergies, depression, and anxiety: the role of the rhinologist. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023. [PMID: 37208976 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- David A Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Guy and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Claus Bachert
- Upper Airway Research Laboratory, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elina Toskala
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Sarah K Wise
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chen T, Chidarala S, Young G, Jeong SS, Nguyen SA, Edwards TS, Schlosser RJ. Association of Sinonasal Computed Tomography Scores to Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:628-634. [PMID: 35917187 DOI: 10.1177/01945998221114078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To perform a systematic review of proposed sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems and determine their association with patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). DATA SOURCES PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. REVIEW METHODS A systematic search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) for studies describing CT scores and PROMs in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. RESULTS A total of 144 studies were included. Out of 20,741 patients, 53.6% were male and 55.5% had nasal polyposis. A meta-analysis of correlations revealed a moderate correlation between Lund-McKay (LM) and the 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22; r = 0.434, P < .001) and a weaker correlation between LM and the 20-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20; r = 0.257, P = .039). Meta-regression also revealed a weak association between LM and SNOT-20 (n = 25 studies) but no significant associations between Zinreich score and SNOT-22 or LM scores and PROMs, including SNOT-22 (n = 94 studies), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (n = 25), nasal obstruction visual analog scale (n = 15), Chronic Sinusitis Survey (n = 12), Total Nasal Symptom Score (n = 4), Total Symptom Score (n = 3), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (n = 3). CONCLUSION There is essentially little association between radiologic grade and PROMs. CT grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shreya Chidarala
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gabrielle Young
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Seth S Jeong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas S Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liebowitz A, Spielman DB, Schlosser RJ, Stewart MG, Gudis DA. Demographic Disparities in the Federal Drug Approval Process for Allergic Rhinitis Medications. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:755-763. [PMID: 35394648 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Demographic minorities are underrepresented in clinical trials. For the approval of new drug applications (NDAs), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has asserted that clinical trial enrollment should represent the demographics of patients likely to receive the trial drug. The aim of this study is to assess the demographics of clinical trials included in NDAs and biologics license applications (BLAs) approved by the FDA since 1990 for allergic rhinitis (AR), a condition whose demographic prevalence mirrors the US population. METHODS Federal Freedom of Information Act requests were submitted to the US government to obtain documents related to all relevant NDAs and BLAs. The Drugs@FDA database was queried for all clinical trial documentation. Demographic data were extracted from clinical trials used to inform FDA approval for AR pharmacotherapies. Demographics were analyzed relative to national US Census data. RESULTS Since 1990, 22 drugs have been approved for AR. The racial, ethnic, and sex composition of all included study populations differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the demographics of AR and from US Census data. Most NDAs and BLAs included overrepresentation of White participants and underrepresentation of Black, Asian, Pacific Island, Native American, and Hispanic participants. CONCLUSION The patients enrolled in clinical trials used to inform FDA approval for AR pharmacotherapeutics do not represent the demographics of the United States or the demographics of AR. The clinical significance of unrepresentative demography between study and treatment populations has been examined for several medical disorders, but has not been studied for AR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 133:755-763, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andi Liebowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Daniel B Spielman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Michael G Stewart
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - David A Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NewYork Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wise SK, Damask C, Roland LT, Ebert C, Levy JM, Lin S, Luong A, Rodriguez K, Sedaghat AR, Toskala E, Villwock J, Abdullah B, Akdis C, Alt JA, Ansotegui IJ, Azar A, Baroody F, Benninger MS, Bernstein J, Brook C, Campbell R, Casale T, Chaaban MR, Chew FT, Chambliss J, Cianferoni A, Custovic A, Davis EM, DelGaudio JM, Ellis AK, Flanagan C, Fokkens WJ, Franzese C, Greenhawt M, Gill A, Halderman A, Hohlfeld JM, Incorvaia C, Joe SA, Joshi S, Kuruvilla ME, Kim J, Klein AM, Krouse HJ, Kuan EC, Lang D, Larenas-Linnemann D, Laury AM, Lechner M, Lee SE, Lee VS, Loftus P, Marcus S, Marzouk H, Mattos J, McCoul E, Melen E, Mims JW, Mullol J, Nayak JV, Oppenheimer J, Orlandi RR, Phillips K, Platt M, Ramanathan M, Raymond M, Rhee CS, Reitsma S, Ryan M, Sastre J, Schlosser RJ, Schuman TA, Shaker MS, Sheikh A, Smith KA, Soyka MB, Takashima M, Tang M, Tantilipikorn P, Taw MB, Tversky J, Tyler MA, Veling MC, Wallace D, Wang DY, White A, Zhang L. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Allergic rhinitis - 2023. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:293-859. [PMID: 36878860 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 57.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the 5 years that have passed since the publication of the 2018 International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2018), the literature has expanded substantially. The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update presents 144 individual topics on allergic rhinitis (AR), expanded by over 40 topics from the 2018 document. Originally presented topics from 2018 have also been reviewed and updated. The executive summary highlights key evidence-based findings and recommendation from the full document. METHODS ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 employed established evidence-based review with recommendation (EBRR) methodology to individually evaluate each topic. Stepwise iterative peer review and consensus was performed for each topic. The final document was then collated and includes the results of this work. RESULTS ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 includes 10 major content areas and 144 individual topics related to AR. For a substantial proportion of topics included, an aggregate grade of evidence is presented, which is determined by collating the levels of evidence for each available study identified in the literature. For topics in which a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention is considered, a recommendation summary is presented, which considers the aggregate grade of evidence, benefit, harm, and cost. CONCLUSION The ICAR-Allergic Rhinitis 2023 update provides a comprehensive evaluation of AR and the currently available evidence. It is this evidence that contributes to our current knowledge base and recommendations for patient evaluation and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah K Wise
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Cecelia Damask
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Private Practice, University of Central Florida, Lake Mary, Florida, USA
| | - Lauren T Roland
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Charles Ebert
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua M Levy
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sandra Lin
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Amber Luong
- Otolaryngology-HNS, McGovern Medical School of the University of Texas, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kenneth Rodriguez
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Ahmad R Sedaghat
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Elina Toskala
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Baharudin Abdullah
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang, Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Cezmi Akdis
- Immunology, Infectious Diseases, Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | | | - Antoine Azar
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Fuad Baroody
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | - Christopher Brook
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Harvard University, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Raewyn Campbell
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Thomas Casale
- Allergy/Immunology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Mohamad R Chaaban
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Cleveland Clinic, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Fook Tim Chew
- Allergy/Immunology, Genetics, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeffrey Chambliss
- Allergy/Immunology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Antonella Cianferoni
- Allergy/Immunology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Anne K Ellis
- Allergy/Immunology, Queens University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | | | - Wytske J Fokkens
- Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Allergy/Immunology, Pediatrics, University of Colorado, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Amarbir Gill
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ashleigh Halderman
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Jens M Hohlfeld
- Respiratory Medicine, Fraunhofer Institute for Toxicology and Experimental Medicine ITEM, Hannover Medical School, German Center for Lung Research, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Stephanie A Joe
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Shyam Joshi
- Allergy/Immunology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | - Jean Kim
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Adam M Klein
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Helene J Krouse
- Otorhinolaryngology Nursing, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, Texas, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - David Lang
- Allergy/Immunology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | | | - Matt Lechner
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University College London, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Stella E Lee
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Victoria S Lee
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Patricia Loftus
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Sonya Marcus
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
| | - Haidy Marzouk
- Otolaryngology-HNS, State University of New York Upstate, Syracuse, New York, USA
| | - Jose Mattos
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Edward McCoul
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Ochsner Clinic, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Erik Melen
- Pediatric Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - James W Mims
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joaquim Mullol
- Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jayakar V Nayak
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - John Oppenheimer
- Allergy/Immunology, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| | | | - Katie Phillips
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Platt
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | - Chae-Seo Rhee
- Rhinology/Allergy, Seoul National University Hospital and College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sietze Reitsma
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Matthew Ryan
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy, Fundacion Jiminez Diaz, University Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Theodore A Schuman
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Marcus S Shaker
- Allergy/Immunology, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Primary Care, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Kristine A Smith
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Michael B Soyka
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Zurich, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Masayoshi Takashima
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Monica Tang
- Allergy/Immunology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Malcolm B Taw
- Integrative East-West Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Westlake Village, California, USA
| | - Jody Tversky
- Allergy/Immunology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matthew A Tyler
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Maria C Veling
- Otolaryngology-HNS, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Dana Wallace
- Allergy/Immunology, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| | - De Yun Wang
- Otolaryngology-HNS, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Andrew White
- Allergy/Immunology, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Luo Zhang
- Otolaryngology-HNS, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pandrangi VC, Mace JC, Kim JH, Geltzeiler M, Detwiller KY, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ, Alt JA, Ramakrishnan VR, Mattos JL, Smith TL. Work productivity and activity impairment in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery-A prospective, multi-institutional study. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:216-229. [PMID: 35938699 PMCID: PMC9905326 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Productivity loss and activity limitations due to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are known to contribute to the significant economic and personal burden of disease. The purpose of this study was to assess productivity and activity impairment before and after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for medically refractory CRS. METHODS This investigation was a prospective, multi-institutional, observational cohort study. Patients diagnosed with medically refractory CRS completed the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-Specific Health Problem (WPAI-SHP) questionnaire before surgery and approximately 6 months after the procedure. Factors associated with minimal clinical important differences (MCIDs) for productivity and activity impairment were identified. RESULTS A total of 279 study participants were screened for inclusion, of whom 176 (63.1%) with postoperative follow-up were included in the final cohort. Preoperative productivity and activity impairment were observed in 63.2% and 69.8% of the patients, respectively. Among these patients, postoperative improvement equaling at least 1 MCID was reported in both productivity (76.1%) and activity (76.4%) impairments. Multivariate regression identified sphenoidotomy (odds ratio [OR], 4.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-17.02) as the only factor associated with increased likelihood of productivity improvement, whereas septoplasty during ESS (OR, 8.45; 95% CI, 2.33-30.68) and migraine (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-0.96) were associated with differential odds of activity improvement. CONCLUSION CRS is associated with a substantial burden on productivity and activity that significantly improves after treatment with ESS. These data may facilitate improved patient counseling and shared decision-making regarding surgical management for CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek C Pandrangi
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jess C Mace
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Jee-Hong Kim
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Kara Y Detwiller
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Vijay R Ramakrishnan
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Jose L Mattos
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Division of Rhinology and Sinus Surgery, Oregon Sinus Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Miglani A, Soler ZM, Smith TL, Mace JC, Schlosser RJ. A comparative analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologics for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:116-128. [PMID: 35980852 PMCID: PMC9877092 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness research between endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and biologic therapy for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a nascent field as new therapeutic modalities become clinically available. METHODS A prospective, multicenter cohort of CRSwNP patients, undergoing ESS between 2011 and 2019, were compared to phase-3 biologic trial data. Patients undergoing ESS received baseline nasal endoscopy quantified via Lund-Kennedy (LK) grading. Patients meeting inclusion criteria, modified from Dupilumab-LIBERTY-NP-24&52, omalizumab-POLYP-1&2, and Mepolizumab-SYNAPSE clinical trials, were included in this study. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures were compared between these cohorts at 24 weeks and 52 weeks, when possible. RESULTS A total of 111 CRSwNP patients met modified inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline age, sex, asthma status, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease status, smell identification, LK-polyp score, and Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores between ESS and biologic groups. At 24 weeks, ESS demonstrated significantly greater improvements in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) compared to one (of two) dupilumab trials (p < 0.05) and both omalizumab trials (p < 0.001). ESS associated with significantly lower nasal polyp scores (NPS) compared to dupilumab (p < 0.001) and omalizumab (p < 0.001), despite comparable improvements in smell identification (p > 0.05). At 52 weeks, ESS resulted in statistically similar improvement in SNOT-22 scores compared to dupilumab (p = 0.21), but NPS remained significantly lower in the ESS group compared to dupilumab (p < 0.001) and mepolizumab (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION At 24 weeks and 52 weeks, ESS offers comparable SNOT-22 improvements compared to dupilumab. ESS and dupilumab offer comparable improvement in smell identification at 24 weeks. Compared to omalizumab, ESS offers superior SNOT-22 improvements. ESS offers significantly greater reductions in polyp size compared to omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Miglani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC
| | - Zachary M. Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC
| | - Timothy L. Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University; Portland, OR
| | - Jess C Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University; Portland, OR
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina; Charleston, SC
- Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center; Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hellings PW, Fokkens WJ, Orlandi R, Adriaensen GF, Alobid I, Baroody FM, Bjermer L, Senior BA, Cervin A, Cohen NA, Constantinidis J, De Corso E, Desrosiers M, Diamant Z, Douglas RG, Gane S, Gevaert P, Han JK, Harvey RJ, Hopkins C, Kern RC, Landis BN, Lee JT, Lee SE, Leunig A, Lund VJ, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Mullol J, Philpott C, Prokopakis E, Reitsma S, Ryan D, Salmi S, Scadding G, Schlosser RJ, Steinsvik A, Tomazic PV, Van Staeyen E, Van Zele T, Vanderveken O, Viskens AS, Conti D, Wagenmann M. The EUFOREA pocket guide for chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 2023; 61:85-89. [PMID: 36507741 DOI: 10.4193/rhin22.344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is known to affect around 5 % of the total population, with major impact on the quality of life of those severely affected (1). Despite a substantial burden on individuals, society and health economies, CRS often remains underdiagnosed, under-estimated and under-treated (2). International guidelines like the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps (EPOS) (3) and the International Consensus statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis 2021 (ICAR) (4) offer physicians insight into the recommended treatment options for CRS, with an overview of effective strategies and guidance of diagnosis and care throughout the disease journey of CRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W Hellings
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leuven, Belgium; University Hospital Ghent, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Ghent, Belgium; Department of otorhinolaryngology and head/neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Nethe
| | - W J Fokkens
- Department of otorhinolaryngology and head/neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - R Orlandi
- Rhinology and Skull Base, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic, Universidad de Barcelona, Centro Medico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G F Adriaensen
- Department of otorhinolaryngology and head/neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - I Alobid
- Rhinology and Skull Base, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Clinic, Universidad de Barcelona, Centro Medico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F M Baroody
- The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - L Bjermer
- Dept of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - B A Senior
- Division of Rhinology, Allergy, and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - A Cervin
- The university of Queensland Centra for Clinical Research, Herston, Australia; Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N A Cohen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J Constantinidis
- 1st Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Aristotle University, AHEPA Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E De Corso
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCSS, Universita; Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - M Desrosiers
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Universita de Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - Z Diamant
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium; Dept of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - R G Douglas
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, New Zealand
| | - S Gane
- Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - P Gevaert
- University Hospital Ghent, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Ghent, Belgium
| | - J K Han
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - R J Harvey
- Rhinology and Skull Base, Applied Medical Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA; Faculty of medicine and heath sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - C Hopkins
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, Guys and St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - R C Kern
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; Division of Allergy-Immunology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - B N Landis
- Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve, Geneve, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - J T Lee
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Skull Base Surgery, Massachusetts, USA
| | - S E Lee
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - A Leunig
- Rhinology Center, Munich and ENT-Clinic, Munich, Germany
| | - V J Lund
- Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, UCLH, London, UK
| | | | - J Mullol
- Rhinology Unit and Smell Clinic, ENT Department, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, Universitat de Barcelona, CIBERES. Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - C Philpott
- NIHR UCLH Biomedical research Centre, London, UK; Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - E Prokopakis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Crete School of Medicine, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Reitsma
- Department of otorhinolaryngology and head/neck surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherland
| | - D Ryan
- Usher institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S Salmi
- Medicum, Haartman Institute, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - G Scadding
- Royal National Ear, Nose and Throat and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - R J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | - P V Tomazic
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - E Van Staeyen
- University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Van Zele
- University Hospital Ghent, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Laboratory of Upper Airways Research, Ghent, Belgium
| | - O Vanderveken
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium; Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium; Multidisciplinary Sleep Disorder Center, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - A-S Viskens
- KU Leuven Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology Research Group, Leuven, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - M Wagenmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Universitatsklinikum Disseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chen T, Chidarala S, Young G, Jeong SS, Nguyen SA, Edwards TS, Schlosser RJ. Association of computed tomography scores to psychophysical measures of olfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:151-159. [PMID: 35771157 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While various sinus computed tomography (CT) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature, no single system has been identified as superior. The strength of associations between CT scoring systems and measures of olfaction also remains unclear. METHODS A systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies that reported both CT scores and measures of olfaction in a cross-sectional manner were included. RESULTS A total of 37 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. Of 8035 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis, 55.6% were male patients and 53.2% had chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Analysis by meta-regression was performed of Lund-Mackay (LM) versus Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT-40; 12 studies), Brief Smell Identification Test (BSIT; 10 studies), Sniffin' Sticks (SS; 10 studies), and Toyota & Takagi (T&T) olfactometry (four studies). A significant moderate association was found between LM and SIT-40 (R2 = 0.612, p < 0.001) and LM and SS (R2 = 0.612, p < 0.001). An association between LM and BSIT approached significance (R2 = 0.461, p = 0.054). No significant associations were noted between LM and T&T olfactometry and between LM and SS when stratified by nasal polyp status. CONCLUSION There is a significant moderate association of current CT scoring systems to SIT-40 and SS. Further research should focus on associations of objective measures of olfaction to CT scores of the nasal cavity, sinuses, and olfactory cleft, as well as other disease markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Chen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shreya Chidarala
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Gabrielle Young
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Seth S Jeong
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Thomas S Edwards
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Abiri A, Patel TR, Nguyen E, Birkenbeuel JL, Tajudeen BA, Choby G, Wang EW, Schlosser RJ, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Kuan EC. Postoperative protocols following endoscopic skull base surgery: An evidence-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2023; 13:42-71. [PMID: 35678720 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative management strategies for endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) vary widely because of limited evidence-based guidance. METHODS The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from January 1990 through February 2022 to examine 18 postoperative considerations for ESBS. Nonhuman studies, articles written in a language other than English, and case reports were excluded. Studies were assessed for levels of evidence, and each topic's aggregate grade of evidence was evaluated. RESULTS A total of 74 studies reporting on 18 postoperative practices were reviewed. Postoperative pain management, prophylactic antibiotics, and lumbar drain use had the highest grades of evidence (B). The literature currently lacks high quality evidence for a majority of the reviewed ESBS precautions. There were no relevant studies to address postoperative urinary catheter use and medical intracranial pressure reduction. CONCLUSION The evidence for postoperative ESBS precautions is heterogeneous, scarce, and generally of low quality. Although this review identified the best evidence available in the literature, it suggests the urgent need for more robust evidence. Therefore, additional high-quality studies are needed in order to devise optimal postoperative ESBS protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Tirth R Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Emily Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Bobby A Tajudeen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eric W Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Shih MC, Soler ZM, Germroth M, Snyder J, Nguyen SA, Schlosser RJ. Impact of Hedonics and Magnitude Upon Validated Psychophysical Olfactory Tests and Olfactory-Specific Quality of Life. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 37:253-263. [PMID: 36341557 DOI: 10.1177/19458924221136649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Patients often describe the olfactory loss as either the inability to detect unpleasant odors (eg, smoke or spoiled food) or noticeable impairment in enjoying pleasant odors (eg, food and fragrances). This complex relationship between the hedonics of various odors, their perceived magnitude in odor strength, and the impact on patient quality of life is not well understood. Methods Sixty-five subjects underwent testing with the Henkin olfaction test which assesses hedonics and magnitude for odors traditionally deemed unpleasant (pyridine/dead fish and thiophene/gasoline) and pleasant (amyl acetate/banana and nitrobenzene/almond). Subjects also completed Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT-40), Sniffin’ Sticks (Sniffin’ Sticks), and Snap & Sniffin’ Sticks (Snap) Olfactory Tests, as well as the 17-item Questionnaire for Olfactory Disorders Negative Statements (QODNS) and olfactory symptom visual analog scale (VAS). Spearman's rank correlations were conducted between various olfactory domains, QODNS and VAS. Results Mean age was 52.1 years (range: 28-86), with 63.1% females. Magnitude estimation was greatest for pyridine. Most people rated thiophene (75.4%) and pyridine (92.3%) as “unpleasant.” Although most people rated amyl acetate (47.7%) and nitrobenzene (56.9%) as “pleasant,” many rated amyl acetate (52.3%) and nitrobenzene (43.1%) as “neutral” or “unpleasant” scents. Hedonics for unpleasant odors correlated with each other ( rs = 0.60), but not with hedonics for pleasant odors. Hedonics for unpleasant odors also correlated with magnitude estimation and other psychophysical tests. These findings were not seen for hedonics of pleasant odors. Conclusions The use of unpleasant odors in Henkin testing showed unique relationship patterns with patient-reported outcome measures and validated olfactory tests, which may provide utility in characterizing olfactory dysfunction. The incorporation of more unpleasant odors in current psychophysical olfactory testing may provide enhanced information regarding the patient impact of olfactory dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C. Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Zachary M. Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Matthew Germroth
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jacob Snyder
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current clinical classifications of olfactory function are based primarily upon a percentage of correct answers in olfactory identification testing. This simple classification provides little insight into etiologies of olfactory loss, associated comorbidities, or impact on the quality of life (QOL). METHODS Community-based subjects underwent olfactory psychophysical testing using Sniffin Sticks to measure threshold (T), discrimination (D), and identification (I). The cognitive screening was performed using Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE). Unsupervised clustering was performed based upon T, D, I, and MMSE. Post hoc differences in demographics, comorbidities, and QOL measures were assessed. RESULTS Clustering of 219 subjects, mean age 51 years (range 20-93 years) resulted in 4 unique clusters. Cluster 1 was the largest and predominantly younger normosmics. Cluster 2 had the worst olfaction with impairment in nearly all aspects of olfaction and decreased MMSE scores. This cluster had higher rates of smoking, heart disease, and cancer and had the worst olfactory-specific QOL. Cluster 3 had normal MMSE with relative preservation of D and I, but severely impaired T. This cluster had higher rates of smoking and heart disease with moderately impaired QOL. Cluster 4 was notable for the worst MMSE scores, but general preservation of D and I with moderate loss of T. This cluster had higher rates of Black subjects, diabetes, and viral/traumatic olfactory loss. CONCLUSION Unsupervised clustering based upon detailed olfactory testing and cognitive testing results in clinical phenotypes with unique risk factors and QOL impacts. These clusters may provide additional information regarding etiologies and subsequent therapies to treat olfactory loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Judy R Dubno
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Mark A Eckert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Andreana M Benitez
- Department of Neurology, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Matthew Gregoski
- Department of Public Health Sciences, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Viswanathan Ramakrishnan
- Department of Public Health Sciences, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Lois Matthews
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhang K, Pipaliya RM, Miglani A, Nguyen SA, Schlosser RJ. Systematic Review of Surgical Interventions for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 37:110-122. [DOI: 10.1177/19458924221134555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Various surgical interventions exist for treatment of inferior turbinate hypertrophy (ITH). Though mucosal-sparing techniques are generally preferred, there is lack of consensus on the optimal technique. Objective This systematic review sought to evaluate the evidence for treatment of bilateral nasal obstruction via inferior turbinate reduction (ITR) and provide a meta-analysis of expected results of various techniques. Methods PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases were queried to include articles describing surgical treatment for ITH. Exclusion criteria were concurrent nasal procedures or non-mucosal ITH. Primary outcomes included visual analog scale for nasal obstruction, nasal cavity volume by acoustic rhinometry, and resistance by anterior rhinomanometry. Subgroup analyses assessed outcomes by rhinitis diagnosis and length of follow-up, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was compared to microdebrider-assisted turbinoplasty (MAIT). Results A total of 1870 studies were identified with 62 meeting inclusion criteria. Reported techniques included turbinectomy, submucosal resection, RFA, MAIT, laser, or electrocautery. All techniques demonstrated significant improvements in nasal obstruction using the visual analog scale. Further comprehensive physiologic data for RFA, MAIT, and laser was available and, compared to baseline, these techniques resulted in significant improvements in nasal resistance, nasal cavity volume, and nasal airflow. Six studies directly compared RFA and MAIT with statistically similar results on VAS, nasal cavity volume, and resistance with median follow-up time of 3.5 months. Assessment of VAS congestion over time reveals peak benefit is achieved between 3–6 months follow-up. Conclusions All reviewed ITR techniques improve patient-reported nasal obstruction. RFA and MAIT provide comparable improvements in patient-reported and physiologic nasal airflow outcomes and while benefits are sustained long-term, the peak benefit for both techniques appears to be achieved within the first year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathy Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Royal M. Pipaliya
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amar Miglani
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shaun A. Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Rodney J. Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM, Mace J, Farrell N, Rimmer R, Alt JA, Ramakrishnan VR, Edwards TS, Smith TL. Profiles of Odorant Specific Performance in Olfactory Testing. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 37:26-34. [PMID: 36069003 DOI: 10.1177/19458924221124692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Olfactory dysfunction (OD) can occur from a variety of etiologies. However, there are few reports examining whether varying etiologies have unique profiles of psychophysical testing that may provide insight into the pathophysiology of OD. METHODS Adults with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps (CRSwNP/CRSsNP) and healthy control adults with no sinus complaints underwent olfactory assessment with Sniffin' Sticks. Profiles of identification and discrimination were compared between CRS and non-CRS subjects across the spectrum of OD. RESULTS Normosmics with or without CRS identified apple, pineapple, and turpentine less frequently than expected (range 52%-68% correct). Hyposmics with CRS correctly identified orange more frequently than control hyposmics (83%-93% vs 68% for controls) with similar findings for rose. Hyposmics of all cohorts were unable to identify apple (26%). Discrimination profiles were similar across the spectrum of OD and between diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS Identification and discrimination rates of specific odorants may provide unique information regarding the etiology of OD, however psychophysical testing is a complex interplay of olfactory and trigeminal function, the strength of target odorant, distractor choices, and familiarity with odorants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jess Mace
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 6684Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Nyssa Farrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 6684Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
| | - Ryan Rimmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 6684Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeremiah A Alt
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 14434University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Vijay R Ramakrishnan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 12250Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Thomas S Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 2345Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 6684Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Spielman DB, Beswick DM, Kimple AJ, Senior BA, Aanaes K, Woodworth BA, Schlosser RJ, Lee S, Cho DY, Adappa ND, DiMango E, Gudis DA. The management of cystic fibrosis chronic rhinosinusitis: An evidenced-based review with recommendations. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12:1148-1183. [PMID: 34933415 PMCID: PMC10083096 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cystic fibrosis (CF) chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has emerged as a distinct diagnostic entity, unique from other endotypes of CRS in its presentation, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. As the sinonasal health of this patient population may have broad effects on pulmonary health and quality of life, a comprehensive understanding of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to CF CRS is essential. In recognizing recent scientific advances and unique treatment modalities specific to this challenging patient population, in this review we systematically evaluate the scientific literature and provide an evidenced-based review with recommendations (EBRR) for fundamental management principles of CF CRS. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was performed. Studies evaluating interventions for the management of CF CRS were included. An iterative review process was implemented in accordance with EBRR guidelines. A treatment recommendation was generated based on an assessment of the benefits, harms, and the overall grade of evidence. RESULTS We evaluated the published literature on 5 unique topics. Each of the following therapeutic categories was investigated explicitly for treatment outcomes in patients with CF CRS: (1) nasal saline; (2) intranasal corticosteroids (INCS); (3) topical antibiotics; (4) cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy; and (5) endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). CONCLUSION Based on the currently available evidence, nasal saline, ESS, and CFTR modulators are recommended in the management of CF CRS when appropriate. INCS and topical antibiotics are options. Clinical judgment and experience are essential in caring for patients with this uniquely challenging disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Spielman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - Daniel M Beswick
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Adam J Kimple
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Brent A Senior
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kasper Aanaes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bradford A Woodworth
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Stella Lee
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Do-Yeon Cho
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Emily DiMango
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | - David A Gudis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Beswick DM, Schlosser RJ. Chronic rhinosinusitis in people with Cystic Fibrosis: Expanding evidence and future directions. J Cyst Fibros 2022; 21:737-738. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2022.07.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
42
|
Parra-Ferro M, Justice JM, Lobo BC, Munger SD, Schlosser RJ, Mulligan JK. Utilization of Nasal Mucus to Investigate the Pathophysiology of Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2022; 36:872-883. [PMID: 35848564 DOI: 10.1177/19458924221111830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nasal mucus is proving to be a useful means by which to study the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Given the increase in publications examining nasal mucus and the lack of a review on this topic, we will focus on this noninvasive approach to studying CRS. Particular attention will be drawn towards inflammatory cytokines and biomarkers and their influence on disease severity. METHODS A literature review of papers published in English pertaining to nasal mucus was performed using the PubMed database. The search utilized combinations of the following keywords: sinusitis, polyps, sample collection, nasal mucus, or nasal secretion. Studies solely on acute or bacterial sinusitis, allergic rhinitis, or cystic fibrosis were not included. RESULTS A wide variety of materials and methods have been used to collect nasal mucus. Numerous assay types have been performed with the most common being ELISA, cytometric bead array, and proteomics. Most studies have focused on examining the levels of Th1/Th2 cytokines along with chemokines associated with type 2 immunity. Other factors identified include growth factors, senescence-associated proteins, complement, and antimicrobial defenses have also been identified. Nasal mucus cytokines have proven useful in cluster analysis and predicting postoperative improvement in Sino-nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) scores. One limitation of the use of nasal mucus is that some studies have suggested that nasal mucus does not always reflect the tissue microenvironment. CONCLUSIONS Nasal mucus represents a critical tool by which to examine the sinonasal microenvironment in a noninvasive manner. Unlike studies of tissue, it can be utilized in both surgically and medically managed patients and avoids the trauma of biopsies. However, studies are still needed to determine the most effective method for nasal mucus collection. Studies should also take care to confirm that nasal mucus markers do, in fact, reflect the levels of the product studied in the tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauricio Parra-Ferro
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jeb M Justice
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Center for Smell and Taste, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Brian C Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Steven D Munger
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 440202University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.,Center for Smell and Taste, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Training Program in Chemosensory Science, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 3463University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Jennifer K Mulligan
- Center for Smell and Taste, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, 3463University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mulligan JK, Nord D, Villanueva MV, Justice J, Lobo B, Schlosser RJ, Atkinson C. Role of C3a as a Novel Regulator of 25(OH)D 3 to 1α,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D 3 Metabolism in Upper Airway Epithelial Cells. J Immunol 2022; 209:262-269. [PMID: 35793909 PMCID: PMC9432430 DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2000726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, primary human sinonasal epithelial cell (HSNEC) 1α-hydroxylase levels are reduced, as is their ability to metabolize 25-hydroxycholecalciferol [25(OH)D3] to its active metabolite, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3]. In this study, we sought to identify the factor responsible for the regulation of HSNEC metabolism of 25(OH)D3, focusing on C3 and C3a. Multiple inhaled irritants trigger the release of complement components, C3 and C3a, leading to suppression of 1α-hydroxylase levels in HSNECs. Recombinant C3a was able to decrease 1α-hydroxylase and impair 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 metabolism, while addition of a C3a receptor antagonist restored conversion. Conversely, 1,25(OH)2D3 suppressed Aspergillus fumigatus-induced C3 and C3a levels in HSNEC supernatant. Given the ability of 1,25(OH)2D3 to modulate LL37 in other cell types, we examined its regulation in HSNECs and relationship to C3a. 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulated the secretion of LL37, whereas A. fumigatus and C3a suppressed it. Conversely, LL37 reduced the release of C3/C3a by HSNECs. Lastly, oral steroid use and in vitro dexamethasone application both failed to increase 1α-hydroxylase or reduce C3a levels. In summary, in this article, we describe for the first time a novel relationship between complement activation and local vitamin D metabolism in airway epithelial cells. The presence of elevated C3/C3a in patients with asthma and/or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps may account for their impaired HSNEC 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3 metabolism and explain why they receive limited therapeutic benefit from oral vitamin D3 supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Mulligan
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and
| | - Dianna Nord
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Maria V Villanueva
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jeb Justice
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and
| | - Brian Lobo
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Carl Atkinson
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL;
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Allensworth JJ, Schlosser RJ, Soler ZM. Identification and enjoyment of food items is reduced in dysosmic subjects: a pilot study. Rhinology 2022; 60:301-307. [PMID: 35753020 DOI: 10.4193/rhin21-311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although dysosmia affects a significant proportion of the adult population, there are a paucity of studies addressing its impact on flavor perception and food enjoyment. This study aimed to assess flavor perception and food enjoyment in subjects with and without dysosmia, comparing performance of items considered olfactory-dominant or trigeminal-dominant. METHODS Adult subjects prospectively underwent Sniffin' Sticks olfactory testing from which threshold, discrimination, and identification (TDI) scores were used to identify dysosmic (TDI over 31) and normosmic subjects (TDI under 31). Forced-choice, blinded flavor identification testing was performed using 8 flavor extracts and 8 real-food purees of either trigeminal- or olfactory-dominant flavor profile. Food enjoyment was quantified using visual analog scales. RESULTS Forty-one subjects were enrolled, including 20 dysosmics and 21 normosmics, with no difference in age or gender. Compared with normosmics, dysosmic subjects had significantly lower identification of extracts and purees. Among dysosmics, overall identification of trigeminal-dominant extracts and foods was higher than olfactory-dominant extracts and foods. Compared with normosmics, dysosmic subjects reported significantly reduced enjoyment of olfactory-dominant extracts and foods; however, there was no significant difference in enjoyment of trigeminal-dominant extracts or foods. CONCLUSIONS Identification and enjoyment of food items is reduced in dysosmic subjects, with the greatest impact in olfactory items. These findings suggest that diet modification might lead to greater enjoyment in those with dysosmia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J J Allensworth
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - R J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Z M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shih MC, Soler ZM, Germroth M, Snyder J, Nguyen SA, Schlosser RJ. Comparison of validated psychophysical olfactory tests and olfactory-specific quality of life. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12:1428-1431. [PMID: 35476373 DOI: 10.1002/alr.23012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Shih
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Germroth
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jacob Snyder
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Medical University of South Carolina, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Miglani A, Soler Z, Schlosser RJ. Novel Devices for Sinus Headache. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2022; 55:519-529. [PMID: 35477843 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Novel medical devices are emerging as low-risk treatment options for patients suffering from sinus headaches. Early trends for the treatment of sinus headaches using medical devices are following the more established primary headache literature. There are two categories of devices with early data supporting use, which may serve as useful adjuncts to conventional pharmacotherapy in the management of sinus headaches not caused by sinusitis: transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation and acoustic vibration with oscillating expiratory pressure. There is currently a paucity of high-level evidence and further studies are needed. Initial reports suggest these interventions are low risk, but longer follow-up is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amar Miglani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Rutledge Tower,135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
| | - Zachary Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Rutledge Tower,135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Rutledge Tower,135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Department of Surgery, Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, 109 Bee Street, Charleston, SC 29401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jeong SS, Chen T, Nguyen SA, Edwards TS, Schlosser RJ. Correlation of polyp grading scales with patient symptom scores and olfaction in chronic rhinosinusitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology 2022; 0:2995. [PMID: 35438689 DOI: 10.4193/rhin22.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various nasal polyp (NP) scoring systems have been proposed and used in the literature. However, no single system has been identified as superior. Correlations between NP scoring systems and patient symptoms, quality of life (QOL) or olfaction vary widely. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline. Any study examining endoscopy scores and symptom, QOL or olfaction measures in cross sectional manner or after therapeutic intervention were included. RESULTS This review identified 55 studies for a pooled meta-analysis of Lund-Kennedy (LK-NP) polyp scores (N = 6), Meltzer scores (N = 6), Nasal polyp scores (NPS; N = 19), Total polyp score (TPS; N=8) Lilholdt scores (N = 8), Olfactory cleft endoscopy score (OCES; N =4), Discharge, inflammation, polyp/edema score (DIP; N = 2), and Perioperative sinus endoscopy score (POSE; N = 2). Meta-regression assessed correlations between NP grading systems and SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), and Smell Identification Test-40 (SIT40). None of the NP grading systems correlated significantly with any symptom, QOL or olfactory metric. In intervention studies of surgery or monoclonal antibody treatment, changes in NPS scores did not correlate with any patient reported outcome measure (PROM) or olfactory outcomes. CONCLUSION Current NP endoscopic scoring systems are not associated with PROMs such as SNOT-22, nasal congestion scores, and TNSS as well as objective measures of olfaction. NP grading systems with improved clinical utility are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S S Jeong
- 1 Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA and 2 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - T Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - S A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - T S Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - R J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Patel ZM, Holbrook EH, Turner JH, Adappa ND, Albers MW, Altundag A, Appenzeller S, Costanzo RM, Croy I, Davis GE, Dehgani-Mobaraki P, Doty RL, Duffy VB, Goldstein BJ, Gudis DA, Haehner A, Higgins TS, Hopkins C, Huart C, Hummel T, Jitaroon K, Kern RC, Khanwalkar AR, Kobayashi M, Kondo K, Lane AP, Lechner M, Leopold DA, Levy JM, Marmura MJ, Mclelland L, Miwa T, Moberg PJ, Mueller CA, Nigwekar SU, O'Brien EK, Paunescu TG, Pellegrino R, Philpott C, Pinto JM, Reiter ER, Roalf DR, Rowan NR, Schlosser RJ, Schwob J, Seiden AM, Smith TL, Soler ZM, Sowerby L, Tan BK, Thamboo A, Wrobel B, Yan CH. International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2022; 12:327-680. [PMID: 35373533 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The literature regarding clinical olfaction, olfactory loss, and olfactory dysfunction has expanded rapidly over the past two decades, with an exponential rise in the past year. There is substantial variability in the quality of this literature and a need to consolidate and critically review the evidence. It is with that aim that we have gathered experts from around the world to produce this International Consensus on Allergy and Rhinology: Olfaction (ICAR:O). METHODS Using previously described methodology, specific topics were developed relating to olfaction. Each topic was assigned a literature review, evidence-based review, or evidence-based review with recommendations format as dictated by available evidence and scope within the ICAR:O document. Following iterative reviews of each topic, the ICAR:O document was integrated and reviewed by all authors for final consensus. RESULTS The ICAR:O document reviews nearly 100 separate topics within the realm of olfaction, including diagnosis, epidemiology, disease burden, diagnosis, testing, etiology, treatment, and associated pathologies. CONCLUSION This critical review of the existing clinical olfaction literature provides much needed insight and clarity into the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with olfactory dysfunction, while also clearly delineating gaps in our knowledge and evidence base that we should investigate further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zara M Patel
- Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Eric H Holbrook
- Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Justin H Turner
- Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Otolaryngology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark W Albers
- Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Aytug Altundag
- Otolaryngology, Biruni University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey
| | - Simone Appenzeller
- Rheumatology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Richard M Costanzo
- Physiology and Biophysics and Otolaryngology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Ilona Croy
- Psychology and Psychosomatic Medicine, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Greg E Davis
- Otolaryngology, Proliance Surgeons, Seattle and Puyallup, Washington, USA
| | - Puya Dehgani-Mobaraki
- Associazione Naso Sano, Umbria Regional Registry of Volunteer Activities, Corciano, Italy
| | - Richard L Doty
- Smell and Taste Center, Otolaryngology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Valerie B Duffy
- Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - David A Gudis
- Otolaryngology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Antje Haehner
- Smell and Taste, Otolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas S Higgins
- Otolaryngology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| | - Claire Hopkins
- Otolaryngology, Guy's and St. Thomas' Hospitals, London Bridge Hospital, London, UK
| | - Caroline Huart
- Otorhinolaryngology, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholgique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Thomas Hummel
- Smell and Taste, Otolaryngology, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Robert C Kern
- Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Ashoke R Khanwalkar
- Otolaryngology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Masayoshi Kobayashi
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Kenji Kondo
- Otolaryngology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Andrew P Lane
- Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Matt Lechner
- Otolaryngology, Barts Health and University College London, London, UK
| | - Donald A Leopold
- Otolaryngology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Joshua M Levy
- Otolaryngology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Michael J Marmura
- Neurology Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lisha Mclelland
- Otolaryngology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Takaki Miwa
- Otolaryngology, Kanazawa Medical University, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Paul J Moberg
- Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Sagar U Nigwekar
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erin K O'Brien
- Otolaryngology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Teodor G Paunescu
- Division of Nephrology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Carl Philpott
- Otolaryngology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Jayant M Pinto
- Otolaryngology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Evan R Reiter
- Otolaryngology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - David R Roalf
- Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nicholas R Rowan
- Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Mt Pleasant, South Carolina, USA
| | - James Schwob
- Biomedical Sciences, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Allen M Seiden
- Otolaryngology, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Timothy L Smith
- Otolaryngology, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Otolaryngology, Medical University of South Carolina, Mt Pleasant, South Carolina, USA
| | - Leigh Sowerby
- Otolaryngology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bruce K Tan
- Otolaryngology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Andrew Thamboo
- Otolaryngology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bozena Wrobel
- Otolaryngology, Keck School of Medicine, USC, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Carol H Yan
- Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Bachert C, Sousa AR, Han JK, Schlosser RJ, Sowerby LJ, Hopkins C, Maspero JF, Smith SG, Kante O, Karidi-Andrioti DE, Mayer B, Chan RH, Yancey SW, Chaker AM. Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:1711-1721.e6. [PMID: 35007624 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab reduced nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP). OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients from SYNAPSE grouped by comorbid asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC). METHODS SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind, 52-week study (NCT03085797), included patients with severe bilateral CRSwNP eligible for surgery despite intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Patients received 4-weekly subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo plus standard of care for 52 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change in total endoscopic NP score (Week 52) and nasal obstruction visual analog scale (VAS) score (Weeks 49-52). Subgroup analyses by comorbid asthma and AERD status, and post hoc by BEC, were exploratory. RESULTS Analyses included 407 patients (289 with asthma; 108 with AERD; 371 and 278 with BEC counts ≥150 or ≥300 cells/μL, respectively). The proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement from baseline in NP score was higher with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid diseases (asthma: 52.9% vs 29.5%; AERD: 51.1% vs 20.6%) and baseline BEC subgroups (<150 cells/μL: 55.0% vs 31.3%; ≥150 cells/μL: 49.5% vs 28.1%; <300 cells/μL: 50.7% vs 29.0%; ≥300 cells/μL: 50.4% vs 28.1%). A similar trend was observed in patients without comorbid asthma or AERD. More patients had >3-point improvement in nasal obstruction VAS score with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid subgroups. CONCLUSION Mepolizumab reduced polyp size and nasal obstruction in CRSwNP regardless of the presence of comorbid asthma or AERD. CLINICAL IMPLICATION Mepolizumab should be considered for the treatment of CRSwNP, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma or AERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claus Bachert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory and Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Ghent University and Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium; Division of ENT Diseases, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institute, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden; First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, International Airway Research Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ana R Sousa
- Clinical Sciences, GSK R&D, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | - Joseph K Han
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Leigh J Sowerby
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Claire Hopkins
- ENT Department, Guys and St Thomas's Hospital, and King's College, London, UK
| | - Jorge F Maspero
- Allergy and Respiratory Research Unit, Fundación CIDEA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Steven G Smith
- Respiratory Therapeutic Area Unit, GSK, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Oliver Kante
- Global Clinical Sciences and Delivery, GSK Munich, Germany
| | | | | | - Robert H Chan
- Clinical Sciences, GSK R&D, Brentford, Middlesex, UK
| | | | - Adam M Chaker
- Technical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Otolaryngology and Center for Allergy and Environment, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen T, Shih MC, Edwards TS, Nguyen SA, Meyer TA, Soler ZM, Schlosser RJ. Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) in Chronic rhinosinusitis with comparison to primary ETD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2021; 12:942-951. [PMID: 34919345 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Otologic symptoms consistent with Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) are common in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), but can also occur independently of CRS as primary ETD. It is unclear if CRS+ETD is similar to primary ETD or how treatment outcomes compare. METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Any study describing ETD in CRS was included. Primary ETD studies were limited to those with pre- and post-operative Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7) scores in ETD treated only with Eustachian tube balloon dilation (ETBD). RESULTS Sixteen studies were included: nine studies with 1336 consecutive patients with CRS and seven studies with 161 patients with primary ETD. In studies with specific data, 225 (47.2%) patients with CRS had a score greater than 14.5, consistent with ETD. In CRS+ETD, baseline mean ETDQ-7 score was 20.7±8.4 and did not differ by polyp status. In primary ETD, mean ETDQ-7 score was significantly higher than CRS+ETD (29.5±8.1, p<0.0001). Regarding treatment outcomes, CRS+ETD treated with ESS alone resulted in mean ETDQ-7 in the normal range (13.2±5.3), with a mean change of -7.4 [95%CI -10.82, -3.99] (p<0.00001). Patients with primary ETD treated with ETBD had post-operative ETDQ7 scores of 14.9±7.5 with mean change of -13.9 [-18.01, -9.88], p<0.00001. CONCLUSION ETD is noted in approximately half of patients with CRS. Outcomes of CRS+ETD treated with ESS alone are similar to those of patients with primary ETD treated with ETBD. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Michael C Shih
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Thomas S Edwards
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Ted A Meyer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Zachary M Soler
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Rodney J Schlosser
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|