Relative Impairments in Hemodynamic Exercise Reserve Parameters in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Study-Level Pooled Analysis

Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trends in cardiometabolic interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction makes up approximately half of overall heart failure and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and overall burden on the healthcare system. It is a complex, heterogenous syndrome and clinical trials, to this point, have not revealed quite as many effective treatment options when compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, there is an expanding amount of data insight into the pathogenesis of this disease and the potential for newer therapies and management strategies. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction pathology has been found to be linked to abnormal energetics, myocyte hypertrophy, cell signaling, inflammation, ischemia, and fibrosis. These mechanisms also intricately overlap with the significant comorbidities often associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease. Treatment of this disease, therefore, should focus on the management and strict regulation of these comorbidities by pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means. In this review, a clinical update is provided reviewing the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trend in cardiometabolic interventions.

Exercise training for patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. A narrative review

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a significant global health challenge, accounting for up to 50% of all heart failure cases and predominantly affecting the elderly and women. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies, HFpEF's complexity poses substantial challenges in management, particularly due to its high comorbidity burden, including renal failure, atrial fibrillation, and obesity, among others. These comorbidities not only complicate the pathophysiology of HFpEF but also exacerbate its symptoms, necessitating a personalized approach to treatment focused on comorbidity management and symptom alleviation. In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, exercise training (ET) was effective in improving exercise tolerance, quality of life, and reducing hospitalizations. However, the efficacy of ET in HFpEF patients remains less understood, with limited studies showing mixed results. Exercise intolerance is a key symptom in HFpEF patients, and it has a multifactorial origin since both central and peripheral oxygen mechanisms of transport and utilization are often compromised. Recent evidence underscores the potential of supervised ET in enhancing exercise tolerance and quality of life among HFpEF patients; however, the literature remains sparse and predominantly consists of small-scale studies. This review highlights the critical role of exercise intolerance in HFpEF and synthesizes current knowledge on the benefits of ET. It also calls for a deeper understanding and further research into exercise-based interventions and their underlying mechanisms, emphasizing the need for larger, well-designed studies to evaluate the effectiveness of ET in improving outcomes for HFpEF patients.

Exercise Intolerance Is Associated with Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Long COVID-19 Syndrome

Background/Objectives: Cardiorespiratory complications are commonly reported among patients with long COVID-19 syndrome. However, their effects on exercise capacity remain inconclusive. We investigated the impact of long COVID-19 on exercise tolerance combining cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with resting echocardiographic data. Methods: Forty-two patients (55 ± 13 years), 149 ± 92 days post-hospital discharge, and ten healthy age-matched participants underwent resting echocardiography and an incremental CPET to the limit of tolerance. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were calculated to assess left ventricular systolic function. The E/e' ratio was estimated as a surrogate of left ventricular end-diastolic filling pressures. Tricuspid annular systolic velocity (SRV) was used to assess right ventricular systolic performance. Through tricuspid regurgitation velocity and inferior vena cava diameter, end-respiratory variations in systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP) were estimated. Peak work rate (WRpeak) and peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) were measured via a ramp incremental symptom-limited CPET. Results: Compared to healthy participants, patients had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower LVEF (59 ± 4% versus 49 ± 5%) and greater left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (48 ± 2 versus 54 ± 5 cm). In patients, there was a significant association of E/e' with WRpeak (r = -0.325) and VO2peak (r = -0.341). SRV was significantly associated with WRpeak (r = 0.432) and VO2peak (r = 0.556). LV-GLS and PASP were significantly correlated with VO2peak (r = -0.358 and r = -0.345, respectively). Conclusions: In patients with long COVID-19 syndrome, exercise intolerance is associated with left ventricular diastolic performance, left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, PASP and SRV. These findings highlight the interrelationship of exercise intolerance with left and right ventricular performance in long COVID-19 syndrome.

Exercise Hemodynamics and Mitochondrial Oxidative Capacity in Disease Stages of Wild-Type Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Wild-type transthyretin amyloid (ATTRwt) cardiomyopathy is increasingly recognized in the development of heart failure. The link between cardiac performance, hemodynamics, and mitochondrial function in disease stages of ATTRwt has not previously been studied but may provide new insights into the pathophysiology and clinical performance of the patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study investigated 47 patients diagnosed with ATTRwt at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. Patients were stratified according to the disease stages of the National Amyloidosis Centre (NAC) as NAC I with low levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) (NAC I-L, n=14), NAC I with high levels NT-proBNP (NAC I-H, n=20), and NAC II-III (n=13). Exercise testing with simultaneous right heart catheterization was performed in all patients. Endomyocardial biopsies were collected from the patients and the mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation capacity was assessed. All NAC disease groups, even in the NAC I-L group, a significant abnormal increase in biventricular filling pressures were noted during exercise while the filling pressures was normal or near normal at rest. The inotropic response to exercise was reduced with diminished increase in cardiac output which was significantly more pronounced in the NAC I-H (Diff. -2.4, 95% CI (-4.2: -0.7), P=0.00) and the NAC II-III group (Diff: -3.1 L/min, 95% CI (-5.2: -1.1), P=0.00) compared with the NAC I-L group. The pulmonary artery wedge pressure to cardiac output ratio at peak exercise was significantly different between NAC I-L and NAC II-III (Diff: 1.6 mm Hg*min/L, 95% CI (0.01:3.3, P=0.04)). Patients with ATTRwt had a reduced oxidative phosphorylation capacity which correlated to left ventricular mass but not to cardiac output capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

An abnormal restrictive left ventricle and right ventricle response to exercise was demonstrated, even present in patients with early-stage ATTRwt. In more advanced disease stages a progressive impairment of the pressure-flow relationship was noted. The myocyte energetics is deranged but not associated to the contractile reserve or restrictive filling characteristics in ATTRwt.

(Non)-Exertional Variables of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure with and Without Cardiac Amyloidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) constitutes an important etiology of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Since patients with CA show early exhaustion, we aimed to investigate whether non-exertional variables of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provide additional information in comparison to traditional peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak).

RECENT FINDINGS

We retrospectively investigated CPET variables of patients with HFpEF and HFmrEF with (n = 21) and without (n = 21, HF) CA at comparable age and ejection fraction. Exertional and non-exertional CPET variables as well as laboratory and echocardiographic markers were analyzed. The primary outcome was the difference in CPET variables between groups. The secondary outcome was rehospitalization in patients with CA during a follow-up of 24 months. Correlations between CPET, NTproBNP, and echocardiographic variables were calculated to detect patterns of discrimination between the groups. HF patients with CA were inferior to controls in most exertional and non-exertional CPET variables. Patients with CA were hospitalized more often (p = 0.002), and rehospitalization was associated with VE/VCO2 (p = 0.019), peak oxygen pulse (p = 0.042), the oxygen equivalent at the first ventilatory threshold (p = 0.003), circulatory (p = 0.024), and ventilatory power (p < .001), but not VO2peak (p = 0.127). Higher performance was correlated with lower E/e' and NTproBNP as well as higher resting heart rate and stroke volume in CA. Patients with CA displayed worse non-exertional CPET performance compared to non-CA HF patients, which was associated with rehospitalization. Differences between correlations of resting echocardiography and CPET variables between groups emphasize different properties of exercise physiology despite comparable ejection fraction.

Impairment of the adrenergic reserve associated with exercise intolerance in a murine model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIM

Exercise intolerance is the central symptom in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. In the present study, we investigated the adrenergic reserve both in vivo and in cardiomyocytes of a murine cardiometabolic HFpEF model.

METHODS

12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were fed regular chow (control) or a high-fat diet and L-NAME (HFpEF) for 15 weeks. At 27 weeks, we performed (stress) echocardiography and exercise testing and measured the adrenergic reserve and its modulation by nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in left ventricular cardiomyocytes.

RESULTS

HFpEF mice (preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, increased E/e', pulmonary congestion [wet lung weight/TL]) exhibited reduced exercise capacity and a reduction of stroke volume and cardiac output with adrenergic stress. In ventricular cardiomyocytes isolated from HFpEF mice, sarcomere shortening had a higher amplitude and faster relaxation compared to control animals. Increased shortening was caused by a shift of myofilament calcium sensitivity. With addition of isoproterenol, there were no differences in sarcomere function between HFpEF and control mice. This resulted in a reduced inotropic and lusitropic reserve in HFpEF cardiomyocytes. Preincubation with inhibitors of nitric oxide synthases or glutathione partially restored the adrenergic reserve in cardiomyocytes in HFpEF.

CONCLUSION

In this murine HFpEF model, the cardiac output reserve on adrenergic stimulation is impaired. In ventricular cardiomyocytes, we found a congruent loss of the adrenergic inotropic and lusitropic reserve. This was caused by increased contractility and faster relaxation at rest, partially mediated by nitro-oxidative signaling.

Exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Causes, consequences and the journey towards a cure

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for over 50% of all heart failure cases nationwide and continues to rise in its prevalence. The complex, multi-organ involvement of the HFpEF clinical syndrome requires clinicians and investigators to adopt an integrative approach that considers the contribution of both cardiac and non-cardiac function to HFpEF pathophysiology. Thus, this symposium review outlines the key points from presentations covering the contributions of disease-related changes in cardiac function, arterial stiffness, peripheral vascular function, and oxygen delivery and utilization to exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF. While many aspects of HFpEF pathophysiology remain poorly understood, there is accumulating evidence for a decline in vascular health in this patient group that may be remediable through pharmacological and lifestyle interventions and could improve outcomes and clinical status in this ever-growing patient population.

Novel Strategies in Diagnosing Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a prevalent global condition affecting approximately 50% of the HF population. With the aging of the worldwide population, its incidence and prevalence are expected to rise even further. Unfortunately, until recently, no effective medications were available to reduce the high mortality and hospitalization rates associated with HFpEF, making it a significant unmet need in cardiovascular medicine. Although HFpEF is commonly defined as HF with normal ejection fraction and elevated left ventricular filling pressure, performing invasive hemodynamic assessments on every individual suspected of having HFpEF is neither feasible nor practical. Consequently, several clinical criteria and diagnostic tools have been proposed to aid in diagnosing HFpEF. Overall, these criteria and tools are designed to assist healthcare professionals in identifying and evaluating patients who may have HFpEF based on a combination of signs, symptoms, biomarkers, and non-invasive imaging findings. By employing these non-invasive diagnostic approaches, clinicians can make informed decisions regarding the best pharmacological and rehabilitation strategies for individuals with suspected HFpEF. This literature review aims to provide an overview of all currently available methods for diagnosing and monitoring this disabling condition.

Development and application of a home-based exercise program for patients with cardiovascular disease: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is recommended for patients with cardiovascular disease. However, the participation and completion rates for hospital-based CR are low, and home-based CR has been suggested as an alternative. This study aimed to develop a home-based CR program and assess the feasibility of the program over a 6-week period in patients with left ventricular dysfunction or a history of myocardial infarction.

METHODS

This feasibility study consisted of two phases. The initial phase (Study 1) focused on developing the home-based exercise protocol. Systematic approaches to developing evidence-based home-based exercise intervention were implemented including systematic review, patient surveys, and expert consensus. Study 2 aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a 6-week home-based CR program that was based on the results of Study 1. Study 2 included two exercise education sessions and four telephone counseling sessions. During this stage of the exercise program, the participants exercised on two separate days and their experiences while performing the aerobic and resistance exercises were surveyed. Eight participants participated in Study 1 and 16 participated in Study 2.

RESULTS

Participants expressed overall satisfaction with the exercise program in Study 1. Heart rate increased in response to exercise, but this did not correspond with perceived exertion. The aim of the home-based CR exercise program was for participants to achieve exercise goals (≥150 min/week of aerobic type exercises as well as at least twice weekly resistance exercise using own body weights). We aimed to increase compliance and adherence to the home-based CR program. In Study 2, 13 out of 16 participants (81.3%) completed the 6-week home-based CR program, with a participation rate of 100% in both exercise education and phone counseling sessions. Adherence to the home-based exercise protocol was 83.1% and no serious adverse events were observed. At the beginning of the study, only three out of 13 participants (23.1%) met the requirements for both aerobic and resistance exercises, but at the end of the 6-week program, 10 out of 13 participants (76.9%) fulfilled the requirements.

CONCLUSION

The exercise program developed in this study was safe and feasible, and the 6-week home-based CR program was feasible for patients with cardiovascular disease without any reported adverse effects.

Contemporary Evidence and Practice on Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Acute or Chronic Heart Failure

Heart failure (HF) has a global prevalence of 1-2%, and the incidence around the world is growing. The prevalence increases with age, from around 1% for those aged <55 years to >10% for those aged 70 years or over. Based on studies in hospitalized patients, about 50% of patients have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and 50% have heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). HF is associated with high morbidity and mortality, and HF-related hospitalizations are common, costly, and impact both quality of life and prognosis. More than 5-10% of patients deteriorate into advanced HF (AdHF) with worse outcomes, up to cardiogenic shock (CS) condition. Right heart catheterization (RHC) is essential to assess hemodynamics in the diagnosis and care of patients with HF. The aim of this article is to review the evidence on RHC in various clinical scenarios of patients with HF.

Pulmonary Hypertension Associated with Left Heart Disease

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of diseases affecting the left heart, mostly found in patients suffering from heart failure, with or without preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Initially driven by a passive increase in left atrial pressure (postcapillary PH), several mechanisms may lead in a subset of patient to significant structural changes of the pulmonary vessels or a precapillary component. In addition, the right ventricle may be independently affected, which results in right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling and right ventricular failure, all being associated with a worse outcome. The differential diagnosis of PH associated with left heart disease versus pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is especially challenging in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities and/or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A stepwise approach to diagnosis is proposed, starting with a proper clinical multidimensional phenotyping to identify patients in whom hemodynamic confirmation is deemed necessary. Provocative testing (exercise testing, fluid loading, or simple leg raising) is useful in the cath laboratory to identify patients with abnormal response who are more likely to suffer from HFpEF. In contrast with group 1 PH, management of PH associated with left heart disease must focus on the treatment of the underlying condition. Some PAH-approved targets have been unsuccessfully tried in clinical studies in a heterogeneous group of patients, some even leading to an increase in adverse events. There is currently no approved therapy for PH associated with left heart disease.

Reducing Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure During Exercise Exacerbates Exertional Dyspnea in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Implications for V˙/Q˙ Mismatch

BACKGROUND

The primary cause of dyspnea on exertion in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is presumed to be the marked rise in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise; however, this hypothesis has never been tested directly. Therefore, we evaluated invasive exercise hemodynamics and dyspnea on exertion in patients with HFpEF before and after acute nitroglycerin (NTG) treatment to lower pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does reducing pulmonary capillary wedge pressure during exercise with NTG improve dyspnea on exertion in HFpEF?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty patients with HFpEF performed two invasive 6-min constant-load cycling tests (20 W): one with placebo (PLC) and one with NTG. Ratings of perceived breathlessness (0-10 scale), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (right side of heart catheter), and arterial blood gases (radial artery catheter) were measured. Measurements of V˙/Q˙ matching, including alveolar dead space (Vdalv; Enghoff modification of the Bohr equation) and the alveolar-arterial Po2 difference (A-aDO2; alveolar gas equation), were also derived. The ventilation (V˙e)/CO2 elimination (V˙co2) slope was also calculated as the slope of the V˙e and V˙co2 relationship, which reflects ventilatory efficiency.

RESULTS

Ratings of perceived breathlessness increased (PLC: 3.43 ± 1.94 vs NTG: 4.03 ± 2.18; P = .009) despite a clear decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at 20 W (PLC: 19.7 ± 8.2 vs NTG: 15.9 ± 7.4 mm Hg; P < .001). Moreover, Vdalv (PLC: 0.28 ± 0.07 vs NTG: 0.31 ± 0.08 L/breath; P = .01), A-aDO2 (PLC: 19.6 ± 6.7 vs NTG: 21.1 ± 6.7; P = .04), and V˙e/V˙co2 slope (PLC: 37.6 ± 5.7 vs NTG: 40.2 ± 6.5; P < .001) all increased at 20 W after a decrease in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure.

INTERPRETATION

These findings have important clinical implications and indicate that lowering pulmonary capillary wedge pressure does not decrease dyspnea on exertion in patients with HFpEF; rather, lowering pulmonary capillary wedge pressure exacerbates dyspnea on exertion, increases V˙/Q˙ mismatch, and worsens ventilatory efficiency during exercise in these patients. This study provides compelling evidence that high pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is likely a secondary phenomenon rather than a primary cause of dyspnea on exertion in patients with HFpEF, and a new therapeutic paradigm is needed to improve symptoms of dyspnea on exertion in these patients.

Impact of the Insoluble Gas Concentration on Measured Stroke Volume at Rest and Submaximal Exercise Using the Innocor Device

INTRODUCTION

The Innocor® device uses an insoluble gas (SF 6 ) to estimate lung volume and the rate of disappearance of a soluble gas (nitrous oxide) to measure pulmonary blood flow (PBF), which approximates cardiac output assuming no shunt. We sought to identify error in the measurement of the insoluble gas in an effort to reduce variation in Innocor® measurement.

METHODS

We enrolled 28 participants from the Dallas Heart Study (mean age, 63 yr; 57% men; 43% White). Stroke volume was measured at rest and at submaximal (20 and 40 W) exercise using both echocardiography (Philips iE33) and the Innocor® device. We defined a priori peak and equilibrium SF 6 measurement errors as greater or less than 20% of the mean observed value. Three Innocor measurements were obtained at rest ( n = 27) for a total of 81 measurements. Of these, 22% had SF 6 measurements that fell outside of the a priori range.

RESULTS

Resting Innocor® stroke volume measures with peak SF 6 measured above a priori range (>0.12%) was associated with larger stroke volumes compared with stroke volume measures without peak SF 6 error (101.4 [26.8] vs 64.9 [8.7] mL; P = 0.006) and overestimated stroke volume when compared with stroke volume by echo (101.4 [26.8] vs 59.9 [16.3] mL; P = 0.017). A similar pattern was observed at submaximal exercise. In contrast, there was no consistent association between variation in equilibrium SF 6 concentrations and measured stroke volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability in peak SF 6 concentration is common while using the Innocor® device and results in overestimated stroke volume. These findings have implications for research protocols using this device.

Recumbent Ergometer vs Treadmill Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test in HFpEF: Implications for Chronotropic Response and Exercise Capacity

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) can identify mechanisms of exercise intolerance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but exercise modalities with differing body positions (eg, recumbent ergometer, treadmill) are broadly used. In this study, we aimed to determine whether body position affects CPET parameters in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

Subjects with stable HFpEF (n = 23) underwent noninvasive treadmill CPET, followed by an invasive recumbent-cycle ergometer CPET within 3 months. A comparison group undergoing similar studies included healthy subjects (n = 5) and subjects with pulmonary arterial hypertension (n = 6).

RESULTS

The peak oxygen consumption (VO₂peak) and peak heart rate were significantly lower in the recumbent vs the upright position (10.1 vs 13.1 mL/kg/min [Δ-3 mL/kg/min]; P < 0.001; and 95 vs 113 bpm [Δ-18 bpm]; P < 0.001, respectively). No significant differences were found in the minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production ratio, end-tidal pressure of carbon dioxide or respiratory exchange ratio. A similar pattern was observed in the comparison groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to recumbent ergometer, treadmill CPET revealed higher VO₂peak and peak heart rate response. When determining chronotropic incompetence to adjust beta-blocker administration in HFpEF, body position should be taken into account.

Challenging the Hemodynamic Hypothesis in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Is Exercise Capacity Limited by Elevated Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure?

BACKGROUND

Exercise intolerance is a defining characteristic of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A marked rise in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) during exertion is pathognomonic for HFpEF and is thought to be a key cause of exercise intolerance. If true, acutely lowering PCWP should improve exercise capacity. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated peak exercise capacity with and without nitroglycerin to acutely lower PCWP during exercise in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

Thirty patients with HFpEF (70±6 years of age; 63% female) underwent 2 bouts of upright, seated cycle exercise dosed with sublingual nitroglycerin or placebo control every 15 minutes in a single-blind, randomized, crossover design. PCWP (right heart catheterization), oxygen uptake (breath × breath gas exchange), and cardiac output (direct Fick) were assessed at rest, 20 Watts (W), and peak exercise during both placebo and nitroglycerin conditions.

RESULTS

PCWP increased from 8±4 to 35±9 mm Hg from rest to peak exercise with placebo. With nitroglycerin, there was a graded decrease in PCWP compared with placebo at rest (-1±2 mm Hg), 20W (-5±5 mm Hg), and peak exercise (-7±6 mm Hg; drug × exercise stage P=0.004). Nitroglycerin did not affect oxygen uptake at rest, 20W, or peak (placebo, 1.34±0.48 versus nitroglycerin, 1.32±0.46 L/min; drug × exercise P=0.984). Compared with placebo, nitroglycerin lowered stroke volume at rest (-8±13 mL) and 20W (-7±11 mL), but not peak exercise (0±10 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Sublingual nitroglycerin lowered PCWP during submaximal and maximal exercise. Despite reduction in PCWP, peak oxygen uptake was not changed. These results suggest that acute reductions in PCWP are insufficient to improve exercise capacity, and further argue that high PCWP during exercise is not by itself a limiting factor for exercise performance in patients with HFpEF.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04068844.

Exercise-Induced Pulmonary Hypertension: A Valid Entity or Another Factor of Confusion?

Exercise-induced pulmonary hypertension EIPH has been defined as an increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) during exercise in otherwise normal values at rest. EIPH reflects heart and/or lung dysfunction and may precede the development of manifest pulmonary hypertension (PH) in a proportion of patients. It is also associated with decreased life expectancy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) or left ventricle (LV) valvular diseases. Diastolic dysfunction exacerbated during exercise relates to increased LV filling pressure and left atrial pressure (LAP). In this context backward, transmitted pressure alone or accompanied with backward blood flow promotes EIPH. The gold standard of EIPH assessment remains the right heart catheterization during exercise, which is an accurate but invasive method. Alternatively, non-invasive diagnostic modalities include exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Both diagnostic tests are performed under gradually increasing physical stress using treadmill and ergo-cycling protocols. Escalating workload during the exercise is analogous to the physiological response to real exercise. The results of the latter techniques show good correlation with invasive measurements, but they suffer from lack of validation and cut-off value determination. Although it is not officially recommended, there are accumulated data supporting the importance of EIPH diagnosis in the assessment of other mild/subclinical or probably fatal diseases in patients with latent PH or heart failure or LV valvular disease, respectively. Nevertheless, larger, prospective studies are required to ensure its role in clinical practice.

Exercise haemodynamics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Exercise right heart catheterization (RHC) is considered the gold-standard test to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, exercise RHC is an insufficiently standardized technique, and current haemodynamic thresholds to define HFpEF are not universally accepted. We sought to describe the exercise haemodynamics profile of HFpEF cohorts reported in literature, as compared with control subjects.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic literature review until December 2020. Studies reporting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) at rest and peak exercise were extracted. Summary estimates of all haemodynamic variables were evaluated, stratified according to body position (supine/upright exercise). The PAWP/cardiac output (CO) slope during exercise was extrapolated. Twenty-seven studies were identified, providing data for 2180 HFpEF patients and 682 controls. At peak exercise, patients with HFpEF achieved higher PAWP (30 [29-31] vs. 16 [15-17] mmHg, P < 0.001) and mean right atrial pressure (P < 0.001) than controls. These differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and body position. However, peak PAWP values were highly heterogeneous among the cohorts (I²  = 93%), with a relative overlap with controls. PAWP/CO slope was steeper in HFpEF than in controls (3.75 [3.20-4.28] vs. 0.95 [0.30-1.59] mmHg/L/min, P value < 0.0001), even after adjustment for covariates (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite methodological heterogeneity, as well as heterogeneity of pooled haemodynamic estimates, the exercise haemodynamic profile of HFpEF patients is consistent across studies and characterized by a steep PAWP rise during exercise. More standardization of exercise haemodynamics may be advisable for a wider application in clinical practice.

Peak O2 -pulse predicts exercise training-induced changes in peak V̇O2 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Exercise training (ET) has been consistently shown to increase peak oxygen consumption (V̇O₂ ) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF); however, inter-individual responses vary significantly. Because it is unlikely that ET-induced improvements in peak V̇O₂ are significantly mediated by an increase in peak heart rate (HR), we aimed to investigate whether baseline peak O₂ -pulse (V̇O₂  × HR^-1 , reflecting the product of stroke volume and arteriovenous oxygen difference), not baseline peak V̇O₂ , is inversely associated with the change in peak V̇O₂ (adjusted by body weight) following ET versus guideline control (CON) in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a secondary analysis of the OptimEx-Clin (Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic Heart Failure, NCT02078947) trial, including all 158 patients with complete baseline and 3 month cardiopulmonary exercise testing measurements (106 ET, 52 CON). Change in peak V̇O₂ (%) was analysed as a function of baseline peak V̇O₂ and its determinants (absolute peak V̇O₂ , peak O₂ -pulse, peak HR, weight, haemoglobin) using robust linear regression analyses. Mediating effects on change in peak V̇O₂ through changes in peak O₂ -pulse, peak HR and weight were analysed by a causal mediation analysis with multiple correlated mediators. Change in submaximal exercise tolerance (V̇O₂ at the ventilatory threshold, VT1) was analysed as a secondary endpoint. Among 158 patients with HFpEF (66% female; mean age, 70 ± 8 years), changes in peak O₂ -pulse explained approximately 72% of the difference in changes in peak V̇O₂ between ET and CON [10.0% (95% CI, 4.1 to 15.9), P = 0.001]. There was a significant interaction between the groups for the influence of baseline peak O₂ -pulse on change in peak V̇O₂ (interaction P = 0.04). In the ET group, every 1 mL/beat higher baseline peak O₂ -pulse was associated with a decreased mean change in peak V̇O₂ of -1.45% (95% CI, -2.30 to -0.60, P = 0.001) compared with a mean change of -0.08% (95% CI, -1.11 to 0.96, P = 0.88) following CON. None of the other factors showed significant interactions with study groups for the change in peak V̇O₂ (P > 0.05). Change in V̇O₂ at VT1 was not associated with any of the investigated factors (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HFpEF, the easily measurable peak O₂ -pulse seems to be a good indicator of the potential for improving peak V̇O₂ through exercise training. While changes in submaximal exercise tolerance were independent of baseline peak O₂ -pulse, patients with high O₂ -pulse may need to use additional therapies to significantly increase peak V̇O₂ .

Diastolic Filling Time, Chronotropic Response, and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction With Sinus Rhythm

Background

Exercise‐induced high heart rate may impair exercise tolerance by reducing diastolic filling time and ventricular filling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Given the importance of chronotropic response, we hypothesized that reduction in diastolic filling time because of exercise‐induced increased heart rate would not impair cardiac output reserve and exercise capacity. We sought to determine the association between heart rate, diastolic filling time, hemodynamics, and exercise capacity in HFpEF.

Methods and Results

Patients with HFpEF (n=66) and controls without HF (n=107) underwent bicycle exercise echocardiography with simultaneous expired gas analysis to measure oxygen consumption. Diastolic filling time was assessed by the overlap time between mitral E‐ and A‐waves (longer overlap time indicates shorter diastolic filling duration). Overlap time increased (ie, diastolic filling time shortened) in HFpEF and controls as heart rate increased with exercise, and the relationship was similar between the groups. Greater heart rate response correlated with higher cardiac output (r=0.51, P<0.0001) and oxygen consumption (r=0.50, P<0.0001) during peak exercise. Shorter diastolic filling time, as assessed by longer overlap time, was correlated with higher cardiac output (r=0.47, P<0.0001) and peak oxygen consumption (r=0.38, P=0.007), not with E/e′ or right ventricular‐pulmonary artery uncoupling. Longer overlap time was associated with mitral A velocity (r=0.53, P<0.0001) and left atrial booster pump strain (r=0.42, P<0.0001).

Conclusions

Shortening of diastolic filling interval in tandem with increased heart rate during exercise does not limit cardiac output reserve or exercise capacity in HFpEF.

Physical Rehabilitation in Older Patients Hospitalized with Acute Heart Failure and Diabetes: Insights from REHAB-HF

BACKGROUND

Prior studies showed an attenuated response to exercise training among patients with heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We explored the interaction between diabetes status and a novel, transitional, tailored, progressive rehabilitation intervention that improved physical function compared with usual care in the Rehabilitation Therapy in Older Acute Heart Failure Patients (REHAB-HF) trial.

METHODS

The effect of the intervention on 3-month Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (primary endpoint), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Fried frailty criteria, and quality-of-life scores (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire [KCCQ] and EuroQoL Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) was compared between participants with and without diabetes. Differences in 6-month clinical outcomes were also explored.

RESULTS

Of the 349 participants enrolled in REHAB-HF, 186 (53%) had diabetes. The prevalence of diabetes was higher in the intervention group (59% vs 48%). Participants with diabetes had worse baseline physical function by the SPPB and 6MWD, but similar frailty and quality-of-life scores. There was a consistent improvement with the intervention for 3-month SPPB, 6MWD, and VAS regardless of diabetes status (all interaction P value > .6), but participants with diabetes had significantly less improvement for frailty (P = .021) and a trend toward lower improvement in KCCQ (P = .11). There was no significant interaction by diabetes status for 6-month clinical event outcomes (all interaction P value > .3).

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with diabetes had worse baseline physical function but showed similar clinically meaningful improvements from the intervention. There was less benefit for frailty with the intervention in participants with diabetes.

A Contemporary Review of the Effects of Exercise Training on Cardiac Structure and Function and Cardiovascular Risk Profile: Insights From Imaging

Exercise is a commonly prescribed therapy for patients with established cardiovascular disease or those at high risk for de novo disease. Exercise-based, multidisciplinary programs have been associated with improved clinical outcomes post myocardial infarction and is now recommended for patients with cancer at elevated risk for cardiovascular complications. Imaging studies have documented numerous beneficial effects of exercise on cardiac structure and function, vascular function and more recently on the cardiovascular risk profile. In this contemporary review, we will discuss the effects of exercise training on imaging-derived cardiovascular outcomes. For cardiac imaging via echocardiography or magnetic resonance, we will review the effects of exercise on left ventricular function and remodeling in patients with established or at risk for cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, heart failure, cancer survivors), and the potential utility of exercise stress to assess cardiac reserve. Exercise training also has salient effects on vascular function and health including the attenuation of age-associated arterial stiffness and thickening as assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Finally, we will review recent data on the relationship between exercise training and regional adipose tissue deposition, an emerging marker of cardiovascular risk. Imaging provides comprehensive and accurate quantification of cardiac, vascular and cardiometabolic health, and may allow refinement of risk stratification in select patient populations. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of novel imaging metrics following exercise training.

Echocardiography in the diagnostic evaluation and phenotyping of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents one of the greatest unmet needs in modern cardiology given its diagnostic difficulty and limited therapeutic options. Echocardiography provides valuable information on cardiac structure, function, and hemodynamics and plays a central role in the evaluation of HFpEF. Echocardiography is crucial in identifying HFpEF among patients with dyspnea, especially when overt congestion is absent. The combination of echocardiographic indices of diastolic function, clinical characteristics, and natriuretic peptide tests has been proposed in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected HFpEF. Echocardiography also provides valuable insight into the pathophysiology and underlying phenotypes of HFpEF. Exercise stress echocardiography can also detect abnormalities that develop only during exercise. This may enhance the diagnosis of HFpEF by demonstrating elevation in the left ventricular filling pressure and may have potential for better pathophysiological characterization. This review focuses on the role of echocardiography in the diagnostic evaluation and phenotyping of HFpEF. We also discuss the potential role of exercise stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and disease phenotyping of HFpEF.

Exercise Intolerance in Older Adults With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Exercise intolerance (EI) is the primary manifestation of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the most common form of heart failure among older individuals. The recent recognition that HFpEF is likely a systemic, multiorgan disorder that shares characteristics with other common, difficult-to-treat, aging-related disorders suggests that novel insights may be gained from combining knowledge and concepts from aging and cardiovascular disease disciplines. This state-of-the-art review is based on the outcomes of a National Institute of Aging-sponsored working group meeting on aging and EI in HFpEF. We discuss aging-related and extracardiac contributors to EI in HFpEF and provide the rationale for a transdisciplinary, "gero-centric" approach to advance our understanding of EI in HFpEF and identify promising new therapeutic targets. We also provide a framework for prioritizing future research, including developing a uniform, comprehensive approach to phenotypic characterization of HFpEF, elucidating key geroscience targets for treatment, and conducting proof-of-concept trials to modify these targets.

miR-181c level predicts response to exercise training in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: an analysis of the OptimEx-Clin trial

AIMS

In patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), exercise training improves the quality of life and aerobic capacity (peakV·O2). Up to 55% of HF patients, however, show no increase in peakV·O2 despite adequate training. We hypothesized that circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) can distinguish exercise low responders (LR) from exercise high responders (HR) among HFpEF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We selected HFpEF patients from the Optimizing Exercise Training in Prevention and Treatment of Diastolic HF (OptimEx) study which attended ≥70% of training sessions during 3 months (n = 51). Patients were defined as HR with a change in peakV·O2 above median (6.4%), and LR as below median (n = 30 and n = 21, respectively). Clinical, ergospirometric, and echocardiographic characteristics were similar between LR and HR. We performed an miRNA array (n = 377 miRNAs) in 14 age- and sex-matched patients. A total of 10 miRNAs were upregulated in LR, of which 4 correlated with peakV·O2. Validation in the remaining 37 patients indicated that high miR-181c predicted reduced peakV·O2 response (multiple linear regression, β = -2.60, P = 0.011), and LR status (multiple logistic regression, odds ratio = 0.48, P = 0.010), independent of age, sex, body mass index, and resting heart rate. Furthermore, miR-181c decreased in LR after exercise training (P-group = 0.030, P-time = 0.048, P-interaction = 0.037). An in silico pathway analysis identified several downstream targets involved in exercise adaptation.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating miR-181c is a marker of the response to exercise training in HFpEF patients. High miR-181c levels can aid in identifying LR prior to training, providing the possibility for individualized management.

MicroRNA-126 Level Increases During Exercise Rehabilitation of Heart Failure with a Preserved Ejection Fraction

Objective

To evaluate the changes of plasma levels of miR-126 in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients undergoing an exercise rehabilitation intervention.

Methods

miR-126 levels in plasma were compared between 60HFpEF patients and 30 healthy volunteers. HFpEF patients underwent exercise rehabilitation for 12 weeks. Before and after rehabilitation, indicators of cardiac function, exercise tolerance, quality of life scores and miR-126 levels were measured and compared. Correlations between plasma levels of miR-126 and HFpEF were evaluated.

Results

The plasma levels of miR-126 in HFpEF patients were lower than those in healthy volunteers and increased significantly after exercise rehabilitation. HFpEF patients also showed significantly better cardiac function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life after rehabilitation. The results of Pearson correlation analysis and multiple linear regression showed that miR-126 levels were positively correlated with peak oxygen consumption (peak VO₂) and metabolic equivalents (METs), and inversely associated with score on the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF) as well as plasma N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels.

Conclusion

miR-126 levels are low expressed in plasma among HFpEF patients. Effective exercise rehabilitation in HFpEF patients may positively impact the plasma level of miR-126, which is probably associated with the restoration of cardiac function, exercise tolerance and quality of life. miR-126 may be a potential biomarker for evaluating the efficacy of exercise rehabilitation for HFpEF patients.

Hemodynamic Heterogeneity of Reduced Cardiac Reserve Unmasked by Volumetric Exercise Echocardiography

Background: Two-dimensional volumetric exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) provides an integrated view of left ventricular (LV) preload reserve through end-diastolic volume (EDV) and LV contractile reserve (LVCR) through end-systolic volume (ESV) changes. Purpose: To assess the dependence of cardiac reserve upon LVCR, EDV, and heart rate (HR) during ESE. Methods: We prospectively performed semi-supine bicycle or treadmill ESE in 1344 patients (age 59.8 ± 11.4 years; ejection fraction = 63 ± 8%) referred for known or suspected coronary artery disease. All patients had negative ESE by wall motion criteria. EDV and ESV were measured by biplane Simpson rule with 2-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiac index reserve was identified by peak-rest value. LVCR was the stress-rest ratio of force (systolic blood pressure by cuff sphygmomanometer/ESV, abnormal values ≤2.0). Preload reserve was defined by an increase in EDV. Cardiac index was calculated as stroke volume index * HR (by EKG). HR reserve (stress/rest ratio) <1.85 identified chronotropic incompetence. Results: Of the 1344 patients, 448 were in the lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve with stress. Of them, 303 (67.6%) achieved HR reserve <1.85; 252 (56.3%) had an abnormal LVCR and 341 (76.1%) a reduction of preload reserve, with 446 patients (99.6%) showing ≥1 abnormality. At binary logistic regression analysis, reduced preload reserve (odds ratio [OR]: 5.610; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 4.025 to 7.821), chronotropic incompetence (OR: 3.923, 95% CI: 2.915 to 5.279), and abnormal LVCR (OR: 1.579; 95% CI: 1.105 to 2.259) were independently associated with lowest tertile of cardiac index reserve at peak stress. Conclusions: Heart rate assessment and volumetric echocardiography during ESE identify the heterogeneity of hemodynamic phenotypes of impaired chronotropic, preload or LVCR underlying a reduced cardiac reserve.

[The role of diastolic transthoracic stress echocardiography with incremental workload in the evaluation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: indications, methodology, interpretation. Expert consensus developed under the auspices of the National Medical Research Center of Cardiology, Society of Experts in Heart Failure (SEHF), and Russian Association of Experts in Ultrasound Diagnosis in Medicine (REUDM)]

Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with certain difficulties since many patients with HFpEF have a slight left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and normal filling pressure at rest. Diagnosis of HFpEF is improved by using diastolic transthoracic stress-echocardiography with dosed exercise (or diastolic stress test), which allows detection of increased filling pressure during the exercise. The present expert consensus explains the requirement for using the diastolic stress test in diagnosing HFpEF from clinical and pathophysiological standpoints; defines indications for the test with a description of its methodological aspects; and addresses issues of using the test in special patient groups.

Exercise-induced mitral regurgitation and right ventricle to pulmonary circulation uncoupling across the heart failure phenotypes

Exercise-induced mitral regurgitation (Ex-MR) is one of the mechanisms that contribute to reduced functional capacity in heart failure (HF). Its prevalence is not well defined across different HF subtypes. The aim of the present study was to describe functional phenotypes and cardiac response to exercise in HFrEF, HFmrEF, and HFpEF, according to Ex-MR prevalence. A total of 218 patients with HF [146 men, 68 (59-78) yr], 137 HFrEF, 41 HFmrEF, 40 HFpEF, and 23 controls were tested with cardiopulmonary exercise test combined with exercise echocardiography. Ex-MR was defined as development of at least moderate (≥2+/4+) regurgitation during exercise. Ex-MR was highly prevalent in the overall population (52%) although differed in the subgroups as follows: 82/137 (60%) in HFrEF, 17/41 (41%) in HFmrEF, and 14/40 (35%) in HFpEF (P < 0.05). Ex-MR was associated with a high rate of ventilation (VE) to carbon dioxide production (VCO₂) in all HF subtypes [31.2 (26.6-35.6) vs. 33.4 (29.6-40.5), P = 0.004; 28.1 (24.5-31.9) vs. 34.4 (28.2-36.7), P = 0.01; 28.8 (26.6-32.4) vs. 32.2 (29.2-36.7), P = 0.01] and with lower peak VO₂ in HFrEF and HFmrEF. Exercise right ventricle to pulmonary circulation (RV-PC) uncoupling was observed in HFrEF and HFpEF patients with Ex-MR [peak TAPSE/SPAP: HFrEF 0.40 (0.30-0.57) vs. 0.29 (0.23-0.39), P = 0.006; HFpEF 0.44 (0.28-0.62) vs. 0.31 (0.27-0.33), P = 0.05]. HFpEF with Ex-MR showed a distinct phenotype characterized by better chronotropic reserve and peripheral O₂ extraction.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Ex-MR is a common mechanism across the spectrum of HF subtypes and combines with ventilatory inefficiency and RV-PC uncoupling. Interestingly, in HFpEF, Ex-MR emerged as unexpectedly prevalent and peculiarly associated with increased chronotropic response and peripheral O₂ extraction as potential adaptive mechanisms to backward flow redistribution.

Left atrial function and maximal exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved and mid-range ejection fraction

Aims

Exercise intolerance is the leading manifestation of heart failure with preserved or mid‐range ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF), and left atrial (LA) function might contribute to modulating left ventricular filling and pulmonary venous pressures. We aim to assess the association between LA function and maximal exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.

Methods and results

Sixty‐five patients, prospectively enrolled in the German HFpEF Registry, were analysed. Inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association functional class ≥ II, left ventricular ejection fraction > 40%, structural heart disease or diastolic dysfunction, and elevated levels of N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP). LA function was evaluated through speckle‐tracking echocardiography by central reading in the Charité Academic Echocardiography core lab. All patients underwent maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and were classified according to a peak VO₂ cut‐off of prognostic value (14 mL/kg/min). NT‐pro‐BNP was measured. Twenty‐nine patients (45%) reached a peak VO₂ < 14 mL/kg/min (mean value 12.4 ± 1.5) and 36 patients (55%) peak VO₂ ≥ 14 mL/kg/min (mean value 19.4 ± 3.9). There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (60 ± 9 vs. 59 ± 8%), left ventricular mass (109 ± 23 vs. 112 ± 32 g/m²), LA volume index (45 ± 17 vs. 47 ± 22 mL/m²), or E/e´ (13.1 ± 4.7 vs. 13.0 ± 6.0) between these groups. In contrast, all LA strain measures were impaired in patients with lower peak VO₂ (reservoir strain 14 ± 5 vs. 21 ± 9%, P = 0.002; conduit strain 9 ± 2 vs. 13 ± 4%, P = 0.001; contractile strain 7 ± 4 vs. 11 ± 6%, P = 0.02; reported lower limits of normality for LA reservoir, conduit and contractile strains: 26.1%, 12.0%, and 7.7%). In linear regression analysis, lower values of LA reservoir strain were associated with impaired peak VO₂ after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, heart rhythm (sinus/AFib), and log‐NTproBNP [β 0.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02–0.30, P = 0.02], with an odds ratio 1.22 (95% CI 1.05–1.42, P = 0.01) for peak VO₂ < 14 mL/kg/min for LA reservoir strain decrease after adjustment for these five covariates. Adding left ventricular ejection fraction, it did not influence the results. On the other hand, the addition of LA strain to the adjustment parameters alone described above provided a significant increase of the predictive value for lower peak VO₂ values (R² 0.50 vs. 0.45, P = 0.02). With receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we identified LA reservoir strain < 22% to have 93% sensitivity and 49% specificity in predicting peak VO₂ < 14 mL/kg/min. Using this cut‐off, LA reservoir strain < 22% was associated with peak VO₂ < 14 mL/kg/min in logistic regression analysis after comprehensive adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, heart rhythm, and log‐NTproBNP [odds ratio 95% CI 10.4 (1.4–74), P = 0.02].

Conclusions

In this HFpEF and HFmrEF cohort, a reduction in LA reservoir strain was a sensible marker of decreased peak exercise capacity. Therefore, LA reservoir strain might be of clinical value in predicting exercise capacity in patients with HFpEF or HFmrEF.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Deliberating the Diagnostic Dilemma of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

There is a lack of consensus on how we define heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), with wide variation in diagnostic criteria across society guidelines. This lack of uniformity in disease definition stems in part from an incomplete understanding of disease pathobiology, phenotypic heterogeneity, and natural history. We review current knowledge gaps and existing diagnostic tools and algorithms. We present a simple approach to implement these tools within the constraints of the current knowledge base, addressing separately (1) hospitalized individuals with rest congestion, where diagnosis is more straightforward; and (2) individuals with exercise intolerance, where diagnosis is more complex. Here, a potential role for advanced or provocative testing, including evaluation of hemodynamic responses to exercise is considered. More importantly, we propose focus areas for future studies to develop accurate and feasible diagnostic tools for HFpEF, including animal models that recapitulate human HFpEF, and human studies that both address a fundamental understanding of HFpEF pathobiology, and new diagnostic approaches and tools, as well. In sum, there is an urgent need to more accurately define the syndrome of HFpEF to inform diagnosis, patient selection for clinical trials, and, ultimately, future therapeutic approaches.

Addressing Orthostatic Hypotension in Heart Failure: Pathophysiology, Clinical Implications and Perspectives

Heart failure (HF)is a condition at high risk for orthostatic hypotension (OH)given the large proportion of patients at an advanced age and high burden of comorbidities contributing to OH, as well as a high prevalence of medications with neurovascular and volume modulating properties. Early identification of OH in HF seems to be crucial as OH can have an impact on patient symptoms, activity level and independence, be a marker of specific pathophysiological changes or be an indicator of need for personalized treatment. OH might contribute significantly to bad enough prognosis in HF, as, besides a risk of falls and cognitive decline, it was found to be associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this review, we aimed to incentivize the routine use of orthostatic testing in HF, as well as stimulate future research in this field, which could lead to significant advances in the treatment and outcomes.

Impaired Exercise Tolerance in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Quantification of Multiorgan System Reserve Capacity

Exercise intolerance is a principal feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), whether or not there is evidence of congestion at rest. The degree of functional limitation observed in HFpEF is comparable to patients with advanced heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. Exercise intolerance in HFpEF is characterized by impairments in the physiological reserve capacity of multiple organ systems, but the relative cardiac and extracardiac deficits vary among individuals. Detailed measurements made during exercise are necessary to identify and rank-order the multiorgan system limitations in reserve capacity that culminate in exertional intolerance in a given person. We use a case-based approach to comprehensively review mechanisms of exercise intolerance and optimal approaches to evaluate exercise capacity in HFpEF. We also summarize recent and ongoing trials of novel devices, drugs, and behavioral interventions that aim to improve specific exercise measures such as peak oxygen uptake, 6-min walk distance, heart rate, and hemodynamic profiles in HFpEF. Evaluation during the clinically relevant physiological perturbation of exercise holds promise to improve the precision with which HFpEF is defined and therapeutically targeted.

Mechanisms of Chronotropic Incompetence in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Chronotropic incompetence is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is associated with impaired aerobic capacity. We investigated the integrity of cardiac β-receptor responsiveness, an important mechanism involved in exertional increases in HR, in HFpEF and control subjects.

METHODS

Thirteen carefully screened patients with HFpEF and 13 senior controls underwent exercise testing and graded isoproterenol infusion to quantify cardiac β-receptor-mediated HR responses. To limit autonomic neural influences on heart rate (HR) during isoproterenol, dexmedetomidine and glycopyrrolate were given. Isoproterenol doses were increased incrementally until HR increased by 30 beats per minute. Plasma levels of isoproterenol at each increment were measured by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and plotted against HR.

RESULTS

Peak VO₂ and HR (117±15 versus 156±15 beats per minute; P<0.001) were lower in HFpEF than senior controls. Cardiac β-receptor sensitivity was lower in HFpEF compared to controls (0.156±0.133 versus 0.254±0.166 beats per minute/[isoproterenol ng/mL]; P<0.001). Seven of 13 HFpEF subjects had β-receptor sensitivity similar to senior controls but still had lower peak HRs (122±14 versus 156±15 beats per minute; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to our hypothesis, patients with HFpEF displayed impaired cardiac β-receptor sensitivity compared with senior controls. In the 7 out of 13 patients with HFpEF with age-appropriate β-receptor sensitivity, peak HR remained low, suggesting impaired sinus node β-receptor function may not fully account for low exercise HR response. Rather in some patients with HFpEF, chronotropic incompetence might reflect premature cessation of exercise before maximal sinus node activation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02524145.

How to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: the HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm: a consensus recommendation from the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the 'HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm'. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for heart failure symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e'), LV filling pressure estimated using E/e', left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2-4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F₁ : Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F₂ : Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.

Myocardial Energetics in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

The role of coronary microvascular disease and its impact on functional and energetic reserve in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains unclear. We hypothesized that in response to submaximal pharmacologic stress (dobutamine), patients with HFpEF have impairment in left ventricular (LV) myocardial mechanical (external work [EW]), energetic (myocardial O₂ consumption [MVO₂]), and myocardial blood flow (MBF) reserve. We further assessed whether coupling of MBF to EW is impaired in HFpEF and associated with compensatory increases or pathological decreases in myocardial O₂ extraction. Lastly, we assessed whether coupling of MVO₂ to EW (mechanical efficiency) was impaired in HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In prospectively enrolled patients with HFpEF (n=19) and age/sex-matched healthy controls (n=19), we performed ¹¹C-acetate positron emission tomography assessing MVO₂ and MBF at rest and during dobutamine infusion. EW was calculated as stroke volume (echo)×end-systolic pressure×heart rate. At rest, compared with controls, patients with HFpEF had higher LV EW, MVO₂, and MBF. With dobutamine, LV EW, MVO₂, and MBF increased in both HFpEF and controls; however, the magnitude of increases was significantly smaller in HFpEF. In both groups, MBF increased in relation to EW, but in HFpEF, the slope of the relationship was significantly smaller than in controls. Myocardial O₂ extraction was increased in HFpEF. Mechanical efficiency was similar in HFpEF and controls. In a post hoc analysis, HFpEF patients with LV hypertrophy (n=10) had significant reductions in LV mechanical efficiency relative to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

In HFpEF during submaximal dobutamine stress, there is myocardial mechanical-, energetic- and flow-reserve dysfunction with impaired coupling of blood flow to demand and slight increases in myocardial O₂ extraction. These findings provide evidence that coronary microvascular dysfunction is present in HFpEF, limits O₂ supply relative to demand, and is associated with reserve dysfunction.

A review of exercise pulmonary hypertension in systemic sclerosis

In general, pulmonary vascular disease has important negative prognostic implications, regardless of the associated condition or underlying mechanism. In this regard, systemic sclerosis is of particular interest as it is the most common connective tissue disease associated with pulmonary hypertension, and a well-recognized at-risk population. In the setting of systemic sclerosis and unexplained dyspnea, the concept of using exercise to probe for underlying pulmonary vascular disease has acquired significant interest. In theory, a diagnosis of systemic sclerosis-associated exercise pulmonary hypertension may allow for earlier therapeutic intervention and a favorable alteration in the natural history of the pulmonary vascular disease. In the context of underlying systemic sclerosis, the purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the evolving definition of exercise pulmonary hypertension, the current role and methodologies for non-invasive and invasive exercise testing, and the importance of the right ventricle.

[Mechanisms of exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Part I: The role of impairments in the left heart chambers]

During exercise an increase in oxygen delivery to working muscles is achieved through well‑coordinated interaction of many organs and systems: the heart, lungs, blood vessels, skeletal muscles, and the autonomic nervous system. In heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, all mechanisms involved in the normal exercise tolerance are impaired. In the first part of this review, the impairments of the left heart chambers are considered ‑ left ventricular diastolic dysfunction, the weakening of the contractile and chronotropic reserves, left atrium dysfunction; the possible ways of their medical correction are also presented.

Impaired oxygen uptake kinetics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Objective

The time needed to increase oxygen utilisation to meet metabolic demand (V̇O2 kinetics) is impaired in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and is an independent risk factor for HF mortality. It is not known if V̇O2 kinetics are slowed in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We tested the hypothesis that V̇O2 kinetics are slowed during submaximal exercise in HFpEF and that slower V̇O2 kinetics are related to impaired peripheral oxygen extraction.

Methods

Eighteen HFpEF patients (68±7 years, 10 women) and 18 healthy controls (69±6 years, 10 women) completed submaximal and peak exercise testing. Cardiac output (acetylene rebreathing, Q̇c), ventilatory oxygen uptake (V̇O2, Douglas bags) and arterial-venous O2 difference (a-vO2 difference) derived from Q̇c and V̇O2 were assessed during exercise. Breath-by-breath O2 uptake was measured continuously throughout submaximal exercise, and V̇O2 kinetics was quantified as mean response time (MRT).

Results

HFpEF patients had markedly slowed V̇O2 kinetics during submaximal exercise (MRT: control: 40.1±14.2, HFpEF: 65.4±27.7 s; p<0.002), despite no relative impairment in submaximal cardiac output (Q̇c: control: 8.6±1.7, HFpEF: 9.7±2.2 L/min; p=0.79). When stratified by MRT, HFpEF with an MRT ≥60 s demonstrated elevated Q̇c, and impaired peripheral oxygen extraction that was apparent during submaximal exercise compared with HFpEF with a MRT <60 s (submaximal a-vO2 difference: MRT <60 s: 9.7±2.1, MRT ≥60 s: 7.9±1.1 mL/100 mL; p=0.03).

Conclusion

HFpEF patients have slowed V̇O2 kinetics that are related to impaired peripheral oxygen utilisation. MRT can identify HFpEF patients with peripheral limitations to submaximal exercise capacity and may be a target for therapeutic intervention.

Effect of Neladenoson Bialanate on Exercise Capacity Among Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) lacks effective treatments. Based on preclinical studies, neladenoson bialanate, a first-in-class partial adenosine A1 receptor agonist, has the potential to improve several heart failure-related cardiac and noncardiac abnormalities but has not been evaluated to treat HFpEF.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether neladenoson improves exercise capacity, physical activity, cardiac biomarkers, and quality of life in patients with HFpEF and to find the optimal dose.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Phase 2b randomized clinical trial conducted at 76 centers in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Patients (N = 305) with New York Heart Association class II or III HFpEF with elevated natriuretic peptide levels were enrolled between May 10, 2017, and December 7, 2017 (date of final follow-up: June 20, 2018).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized (1:2:2:2:2:3) to neladenoson (n = 27 [5 mg], n = 50 [10 mg], n = 51 [20 mg], n = 50 [30 mg], and n = 51 [40 mg]) or matching placebo (n = 76) for 20 weeks of treatment.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was change in 6-minute walk test distance from baseline to 20 weeks (minimal clinically important difference, 40 m). Key safety measures included bradyarrhythmias and adverse events. To evaluate the effects of varying doses of neladenoson, a multiple comparison procedure with 5 modeling techniques (linear, Emax, 2 variations of sigmoidal Emax, and quadratic) was used to evaluate diverse dose-response profiles.

RESULTS

Among 305 patients who were randomized (mean age, 74 years; 160 [53%] women; mean 6-minute walk test distance, 321.5 m), 261 (86%) completed the trial and were included in the primary analysis. After 20 weeks of treatment, the mean absolute changes from baseline in 6-minute walk test distance were 0.2 m (95% CI, -12.1 to 12.4 m) for the placebo group; 19.4 m (95% CI, -10.8 to 49.7 m) for the 5 mg of neladenoson group; 29.4 m (95% CI, 3.0 to 55.8 m) for 10 mg of neladenoson group; 13.8 m (95% CI, -2.3 to 29.8 m) for 20 mg of neladenoson group; 16.3 m (95% CI, -1.1 to 33.6 m) for 30 mg of neladenoson group; and 13.0 m (95% CI, -5.9 to 31.9 m) for 40 mg of neladenoson group. Because none of the neladenoson groups achieved the clinically relevant 40-m increase in 6-minute walk test distance from baseline, an optimal dose of neladenoson was not identified. There was no significant dose-response relationship for the change in 6-minute walk test distance among the 5 different dose-response models (P = .05 for Emax; P = .18 for quadratic; P = .21 for sigmoidal Emax 1; P = .39 for linear; and P = .52 for sigmoidal Emax 2). Serious adverse events were similar among the neladenoson groups (61/229 [26.6%]) and the placebo group (21/76 [27.6%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with HFpEF, there was no significant dose-response relationship detected for neladenoson with regard to the change in exercise capacity from baseline to 20 weeks. In light of these findings, novel approaches will be needed if further development of neladenoson for the treatment of patients with HFpEF is pursued.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03098979.

Differential Clinical Profiles, Exercise Responses, and Outcomes Associated With Existing HFpEF Definitions

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is common, yet there is currently no consensus on how to define HFpEF according to various society and clinical trial criteria. How clinical and hemodynamic profiles of patients vary across definitions is unclear. We sought to determine clinical characteristics, as well as physiologic and prognostic implications of applying various criteria to define HFpEF.

METHODS

We examined consecutive patients with chronic exertional dyspnea (New York Heart Association class II to IV) and ejection fraction ≥50% referred for comprehensive cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring. We applied societal and clinical trial HFpEF definitions and compared clinical profiles, exercise responses, and cardiovascular outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 461 patients (age 58±15 years, 62% women), 416 met American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA), 205 met European Society of Cardiology (ESC), and 55 met Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) criteria for HFpEF. Clinical profiles and exercise capacity varied across definitions, with peak oxygen uptake of 16.2±5.2 (ACC/AHA), 14.1±4.2 (ESC), and 12.7±3.1 mL·kg^-1·min^-1 (HFSA). A total of 243 patients had hemodynamic evidence of HFpEF (abnormal rest or exercise filling pressures), of whom 222 met ACC/AHA, 161 met ESC, and 41 met HFSA criteria. Over a mean follow-up of 3.8 years, the incidence of cardiovascular outcomes ranged from 75 (ACC/AHA) to 298 events per 1000 person-years (HFSA). Application of clinical trial definitions of HFpEF similarly resulted in distinct patient classification and prognostication.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of different HFpEF classifications variably enriches for future cardiovascular events, but at the expense of not including up to 85% of individuals with physiologic evidence of HFpEF. Comprehensive phenotyping of patients with suspected heart failure highlights the limitations and heterogeneity of current HFpEF definitions and may help to refine HFpEF subgrouping to test therapeutic interventions.

Right Ventricular-Arterial Uncoupling During Exercise in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Role of Pulmonary Vascular Dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is associated with shortened life expectancy in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The contribution of pulmonary vascular dysfunction to RV dysfunction in HFpEF is not well understood.

METHODS

We investigated rest and exercise invasive pulmonary hemodynamics, ventilation, and gas exchange in 67 patients with HFpEF (of whom 28 had an abnormal pulmonary vascular response during exercise referred to as HFpEF+PVR group and 39 had a normal pulmonary vascular response during exercise referred to as HFpEF group) and in 21 matched control subjects.

RESULTS

Both groups of patients with HFpEF had a markedly decreased peak oxygen consumption (Vo₂), decreased oxygen delivery, and impaired chronotropic response. Single beat analysis of RV pressure waveforms was used to compute the end-systolic elastance (Ees) and pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea). Right ventricular-pulmonary artery (RV-PA) coupling was measured as the ratio of Ees/Ea. Exercise was associated with a preserved Ees response but a decreased Ees/Ea in patients with HFpEF with a normal PVR response, indicating partially preserved RV contractile reserve. In HFpEF+PVR, exercise-induced increase in Ees was markedly reduced, resulting in decreased Ees/Ea and RV-PA uncoupling. Patients with HFpEF+PVR with an exercise-induced decrease in Ees/Ea had lower pulmonary artery compliance, lower peak Vo₂, and lower stroke volume than patients with HFpEF.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that RV-PA uncoupling is common in HFpEF and is caused by both intrinsic RV contractile impairment and afterload mismatch. Resting and dynamic RV-PA uncoupling in HFpEF is driven by an increase in RV pulsatile rather than resistive afterload. However, with the additive effects of increased RV resistive afterload, RV-PA uncoupling worsens dynamically during exercise.