Decline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Anthracyclines Predicts Trastuzumab Cardiotoxicity

Circulating microRNAs and therapy-associated cardiac events in HER2-positive breast cancer patients: an exploratory analysis from NeoALTTO

PURPOSE

The relevance of cardiotoxicity in the context of HER2-positive breast cancer is likely to increase with increasing patient treatment exposure, number of treatment lines, and prolonged survival. Circulating biomarkers to early identify patients at risk of cardiotoxicity could allow personalized treatment and follow-up measures. The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between circulating microRNAs and adverse cardiac events in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

METHODS

We based our work on plasma samples from NeoALTTO trial obtained at baseline, after 2 weeks of anti-HER2 therapy, and immediately before surgery. Eleven patients experienced either a symptomatic or asymptomatic cardiac event. Circulating microRNAs were profiled in all patients presenting a cardiac event (case) and in an equal number of matched patients free of reported cardiac events (controls) using microRNA-Ready-to-Use PCR (Human panel I + II). Sensitivity analyses were performed by increasing the number of controls to 1:2 and 1:3. Normalized microRNA expression levels were compared between cases and controls using the non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

Eight circulating microRNAs resulted differentially expressed after 2 weeks of anti-HER2 therapy between patients experiencing or not a cardiac event. Specifically, the expression of miR-125b-5p, miR-409-3p, miR-15a-5p, miR-423-5p, miR-148a-3p, miR-99a-5p, and miR-320b increased in plasma of cases as compared to controls, while the expression of miR-642a-5p decreases. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that all these microRNAs were involved in cardiomyocyte adrenergic signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

This study provides proof of concept that circulating microRNAs tested soon after treatment start could serve as biomarkers of cardiotoxicity in a very early stage in breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy.

Prediction of heart failure and all-cause mortality using cardiac ultrasomics in patients with breast cancer

Breast cancer chemotherapy/immunotherapy can be associated with treatment-limiting cardiotoxicity. Radiomics techniques applied to ultrasound, known as ultrasomics, can be used in cardio-oncology to leverage echocardiography for added prognostic value. To utilize ultrasomics features collected prior to antineoplastic therapy to enhance prediction of mortality and heart failure (HF) in patients with breast cancer. Patients were retrospectively recruited in a study at the West Virginia University Cancer Institute. The final inclusion criteria were met by a total of 134 patients identified for the study. Patients were imaged using echocardiography in the parasternal long axis prior to receiving chemotherapy. All-cause mortality and HF, developed during treatment, were the primary outcomes. 269 features were assessed, grouped into four major classes: demographics (n = 21), heart function (n = 7), antineoplastic medication (n = 17), and ultrasomics (n = 224). Data was split into an internal training (60%, n = 81) and testing (40%, n = 53) set. Ultrasomics features augmented classification of mortality (area under the curve (AUC) 0.89 vs. 0.65, P = 0.003), when compared to demographic variables. When developing a risk prediction score for each feature category, ultrasomics features were significantly associated with both mortality (P = 0.031, log-rank test) and HF (P = 0.002, log-rank test). Further, only ultrasomics features provided significant improvement over demographic variables when predicting mortality (C-Index: 0.78 vs. 0.65, P = 0.044) and HF (C-Index: 0.77 vs. 0.60, P = 0.017), respectively. With further investigation, a clinical decision support tool could be developed utilizing routinely obtained patient data alongside ultrasomics variables to augment treatment regimens.

Health Literacy, Individual and Community Engagement, and Cardiovascular Risks and Disparities: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Cardiovascular and cancer outcomes intersect within the realm of cardio-oncology survivorship care, marked by disparities across ethnic, racial, social, and geographical landscapes. Although the clinical community is increasingly aware of this complex issue, effective solutions are trailing. To attain substantial public health impact, examinations of cancer types and cardiovascular risk mitigation require complementary approaches that elicit the patient's perspective, scale it to a population level, and focus on actionable population health interventions. Adopting such a multidisciplinary approach will deepen our understanding of patient awareness, motivation, health literacy, and community resources for addressing the unique challenges of cardio-oncology. Geospatial analysis aids in identifying key communities in need within both granular and broader contexts. In this review, we delineate a pathway that navigates barriers from individual to community levels. Data gleaned from these perspectives are critical in informing interventions that empower individuals within diverse communities and improve cardio-oncology survivorship.

Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: The Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Cardioprotective Measures in a Cancer Centre in Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity can exhibit several patterns of functional, structural, and vascular complications. This study aims to identify the patterns and the factors associated with cardiotoxicity in cancer patients.

METHOD

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 96 adult cancer patients undergoing anticancer therapy was investigated at King Khalid Hospital in Najran, Saudi Arabia, from May 2022 to April 2023. The data on patient and cancer characteristics, treatment, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Factors associated with cardiotoxicity were investigated through univariate analyses using odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

 Among the 96 cancer patients in the study, cardiotoxicity occurred in 12 individuals (12.5%). The mean age was 57.0 ± 13.3 years (range: 32-81 years), with 32 (33.3%) being above 65 years. The most common comorbidities were diabetes (n=48; 50%), followed by hypertension (n=32; 33.3%), and dyslipidemia (n=20; 20.8%). The most common cancers were gastrointestinal cancer (n=32; 33.3%), followed by breast cancer (n=22; 22.9%) and lymphoma (n=14; 14.6%). Females were disproportionately affected (64.6%), with 57.3% of them in the metastatic stage. The majority of patients (90.6%) had normal ejection fraction before chemotherapy initiation. In univariate analysis, current smoking (OR: 7.00; 95%CI: 1.94-25.25, p= 0.003), history of percutaneous cardiac intervention (OR: 40.24; 95%CI: 1.80-896.26, p= 0.019), diabetes (OR: 6.05; 95%CI: 1.24-29.32, p= 0.025), renal failure (OR: 8.20; 95%CI: 0.91-74.88, p= 0.046), dyslipidemia (OR: 5.00; 95 CI: 1.38-18.32, p=0.012), anthracycline use (OR: 18.33; 95%CI: 4.36-126.55, p <0.001), trastuzumab use (OR: 25.00; 95%CI: 6.25-129.86, p < 0.001), and increased chemotherapy cycles number (> 10 cycles) (OR: 73.00; 95%CI: 8.56- 622.36, p < 0.001) were associated with cardiotoxicity. Additionally, beta-blocker use was associated with lower rates of cardiotoxicity (OR: 0.17; 95%CI: 0.036-0.84, p= 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of cardiotoxicity among cancer patients treated with chemotherapy is modest, difficult to predict, and independent of baseline cardiac systolic functions. Factors associated with cardiotoxicity include smoking, history of percutaneous cardiac intervention, diabetes, renal failure, dyslipidemia, anthracycline or trastuzumab use, and increased chemotherapy cycle numbers. A combination of various anticancer drugs and chemotherapy may dramatically raise the risk of cardiotoxicity in cancer patients. As a result, patients receiving high-risk cardiotoxic drugs should be monitored with caution to avoid drug-related cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, proactive treatment techniques aiming at reducing the possible cardiotoxic effects of anticancer therapy are critical.

An In Silico Platform to Predict Cardiotoxicity Risk of Anti-tumor Drug Combination with hiPSC-CMs Based In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVE

Antineoplastic agent-induced systolic dysfunction is a major reason for interruption of anticancer treatment. Although targeted anticancer agents infrequently cause systolic dysfunction, their combinations with chemotherapies remarkably increase the incidence. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) provide a potent in vitro model to assess cardiovascular safety. However, quantitatively predicting the reduction of ejection fraction based on hiPSC-CMs is challenging due to the absence of the body's regulatory response to cardiomyocyte injury.

METHODS

Here, we developed and validated an in vitro-in vivo translational platform to assess the reduction of ejection fraction induced by antineoplastic drugs based on hiPSC-CMs. The translational platform integrates drug exposure, drug-cardiomyocyte interaction, and systemic response. The drug-cardiomyocyte interaction was implemented as a mechanism-based toxicodynamic (TD) model, which was then integrated into a quantitative system pharmacology-physiological-based pharmacokinetics (QSP-PBPK) model to form a complete translational platform. The platform was validated by comparing the model-predicted and clinically observed incidence of doxorubicin and trastuzumab-induced systolic dysfunction.

RESULTS

A total of 33,418 virtual patients were incorporated to receive doxorubicin and trastuzumab alone or in combination. For doxorubicin, the QSP-PBPK-TD model successfully captured the overall trend of systolic dysfunction incidences against the cumulative doses. For trastuzumab, the predicted incidence interval was 0.31-2.7% for single-agent treatment and 0.15-10% for trastuzumab-doxorubicin sequential treatment, covering the observations in clinical reports (0.50-1.0% and 1.5-8.3%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the in vitro-in vivo translational platform is capable of predicting systolic dysfunction incidence almost merely depend on hiPSC-CMs, which could facilitate optimizing the treatment protocol of antineoplastic agents.

Circulating Cardiovascular Biomarkers in Cancer Therapeutics-Related Cardiotoxicity: Review of Critical Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions

Cardiotoxicity is a growing concern in the oncology population. Transthoracic echocardiography and multigated acquisition scans have been used for surveillance but are relatively insensitive and resource intensive. Innovative imaging techniques are constrained by cost and availability. More sensitive, cost-effective cardiotoxicity surveillance strategies are needed. Circulating cardiovascular biomarkers could provide a sensitive, low-cost solution. Biomarkers such as troponins, natriuretic peptides (NPs), novel upstream signals of oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis as well as panomic technologies have shown substantial promise, and guidelines recommend baseline measurement of troponins and NPs in all patients receiving potential cardiotoxins. Nonetheless, supporting evidence has been hampered by several limitations. Previous reviews have provided valuable perspectives on biomarkers in cancer populations, but important analytic aspects remain to be examined in depth. This review provides comprehensive assessment of critical challenges and solutions in this field, with focus on analytical issues relating to biomarker measurement and interpretation. Examination of evidence pertaining to common and serious forms of cardiotoxicity reveals that improved study designs incorporating larger, more diverse populations, registry-based approaches, and refinement of current definitions are key. Further efforts to harmonize biomarker methodologies including centralized biobanking and analyses, novel decision limits, and head-to-head comparisons are needed. Multimarker algorithms incorporating machine learning may allow rapid, personalized risk assessment. These improvements will not only augment the predictive value of circulating biomarkers in cardiotoxicity but may elucidate both direct and indirect relationships between cardiovascular disease and cancer, allowing biomarkers a greater role in the development and success of novel anticancer therapies.

New Insights in the Era of Clinical Biomarkers as Potential Predictors of Systemic Therapy-Induced Cardiotoxicity in Women with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

Cardiotoxicity induced by breast cancer therapies is a potentially serious complication associated with the use of various breast cancer therapies. Prediction and better management of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving chemotherapy is of critical importance. However, the management of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) lacks clinical evidence and is based on limited clinical studies.

AIM

To provide an overview of existing and potentially novel biomarkers that possess a promising predictive value for the early and late onset of CTRCD in the clinical setting.

METHODS

A systematic review of published studies searching for promising biomarkers for the prediction of CTRCD in patients with breast cancer was undertaken according to PRISMA guidelines. A search strategy was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus for the period 2013-2023. All subjects were >18 years old, diagnosed with breast cancer, and received breast cancer therapies.

RESULTS

The most promising biomarkers that can be used for the development of an alternative risk cardiac stratification plan for the prediction and/or early detection of CTRCD in patients with breast cancer were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

We highlighted the new insights associated with the use of currently available biomarkers as a standard of care for the management of CTRCD and identified potentially novel clinical biomarkers that could be further investigated as promising predictors of CTRCD.

Global longitudinal strain at 3 months after therapy can predict late cardiotoxicity in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) is a major contributor to poor prognosis in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing chemotherapy. Left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) has predictive value for CTR-CVT, while few researchers take into account late-onset CTR-CVT. This study sought to provide a guide for the prediction of late-onset CTR-CVT in primary BC over the 2 years follow-up via strain and contrast-enhanced echocardiography.

METHODS

Anthracycline and anthracycline + targeted medication groups were created from 111 patients with stage I-III primary BC who were prospectively included. The left ventricular diastolic function, LV global long-axis strain (GLS); left ventricular ejection fraction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography (c-LVEF), and electrocardiograms were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the start of cancer treatment. The high-sensitivity troponin-T and NT-pro BNP at baseline and 3 months after chemotherapy were measured.

RESULTS

(1) LV GLS decreased in BC patients over time. (2) After 12 months' follow-up, the LV GLS in the anthracycline+ targeted group was lower than in the anthracycline group. After 24 months' follow-up, the GLS and c-LVEF in the anthracycline + targeted group declined while the E/e' increased. (3) Decreased LVEF (56%) and arrhythmia (38%) are the common causes of CTR-CVT. Lower LVEF was a major factor in late-onset CTR-CVT. (4) Combination of LV GLS and c-LVEF at 3 months were used as predictors for CTR-CVT and exhibited a higher AUC than either one alone (AUC = 0.929, 95% CI: 0.863-0.970). LV GLS at 3 months can predict the late-onset CTR-CVT (AUC = 0.745, p < 0.001), and the cut-off is 20.32%.

CONCLUSIONS

As time went on, the systolic and diastolic dysfunction of BC patients get worsened. The combination of LV GLS and c-LVEF is better in the prediction of CTR-CVT. Only the LV GLS at 3 months can predict the late-onset CTR-CVT.

Cardiotoxicity, Cardioprotection, and Prognosis in Survivors of Anticancer Treatment Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Unmet Needs

BACKGROUND

Anticancer treatments are improving the prognosis of patients fighting cancer. However, anticancer treatments may also increase the cardiovascular (CV) risk by increasing metabolic disorders. Atherosclerosis and atherothrombosis related to anticancer treatments may lead to ischemic heart disease (IHD), while direct cardiac toxicity may induce non-ischemic heart disease. Moreover, valvular heart disease (VHD), aortic syndromes (AoS), and advanced heart failure (HF) associated with CV risk factors and preclinical CV disease as well as with chronic inflammation and endothelial dysfunction may also occur in survivors of anti-carcer treatments.

METHODS

Public electronic libraries have been searched systematically looking at cardiotoxicity, cardioprotection, CV risk and disease, and prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments.

RESULTS

CV risk factors and disease may not be infrequent among survivors of anticancer treatments. As cardiotoxicity of established anticancer treatments has been investigated and is frequently irreversible, cardiotoxicity associated with novel treatments appears to be more frequently reversible, but also potentially synergic. Small reports suggest that drugs preventing HF in the general population may be effective also among survivors of anticancer treatments, so that CV risk factors and disease, and chronic inflammation, may lead to indication to cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments. There is a lack of substantial data on whether current risk scores are efficient to predict prognosis after cardiac surgery in survivors of anticancer treatments, and to guide tailored decision-making. IHD is the most common condition requiring cardiac surgery among survivors of anticancer treatments. Primary VHD is mostly related to a history of radiation therapy. No specific reports exist on AoS in survivors of anticancer treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unclear whether interventions to dominate cancer- and anticancer treatment-related metabolic syndromes, chronic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, leading to IHD, nonIHD, VHD, HF, and AoS, are as effective in survivors of anticancer treatments as in the general population. When CV diseases require cardiac surgery, survivors of anticancer treatments may be a population at specifically elevated risk, rather than affected by a specific risk factor.

Risk Prediction Models for Cardiotoxicity of Chemotherapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE

Cardiotoxicity is a serious adverse effect that can occur in women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Identifying patients who will develop cardiotoxicity remains challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To identify, describe, and evaluate all prognostic models developed to predict cardiotoxicity following treatment in women with breast cancer.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

This systematic review searched the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to September 22, 2021, to include studies developing or validating a prediction model for cardiotoxicity in women with breast cancer. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) was used to assess both the risk of bias and the applicability of the prediction modeling studies. Transparency reporting was assessed with the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) tool.

FINDINGS

After screening 590 publications, we identified 7 prognostic model studies for this review. Six were model development studies and 1 was an external validation study. Outcomes included occurrence of cardiac dysfunction (echocardiographic parameters), heart failure, and composite clinical outcomes. Model discrimination, measured by the area under receiver operating curves or C statistic, ranged from 0.70 (95% IC, 0.62-0.77) to 0.87 (95% IC, 0.77-0.96). The most common predictors identified in final prediction models included age, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction, hypertension, and diabetes. Four of the developed models were deemed to be at high risk of bias due to analysis concerns, particularly for sample size, handling of missing data, and not presenting appropriate performance statistics. None of the included studies examined the clinical utility of the developed model. All studies met more than 80% of the items in TRIPOD checklist.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this systematic review of the 6 predictive models identified, only 1 had undergone external validation. Most of the studies were assessed as being at high overall risk of bias. Application of the reporting guidelines may help future research and improve the reproducibility and applicability of prediction models for cardiotoxicity following breast cancer treatment.

Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance for early detection of cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Prognosis of breast cancer patients has been improved along with the progress in cancer therapies. However, cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) has been an emerging issue. For early detection of CTRCD, we examined whether native T1 mapping and global longitudinal strain (GLS) using cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and biomarkers analysis are useful.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 83 consecutive chemotherapy-naïve female patients with breast cancer (mean age, 56 ± 13 yrs.) between 2017 and 2020. CTRCD was defined based on echocardiography as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 53% at any follow-up period with LVEF>10% points decrease from baseline after chemotherapy. To evaluate cardiac function, CMR (at baseline and 6 months), 12‑lead ECG, echocardiography, and biomarkers (at baseline and every 3 months) were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 164 CMRs were performed in 83 patients. LVEF and GLS were significantly decreased after chemotherapy (LVEF, from 71.2 ± 4.4 to 67.6 ± 5.8%; GLS, from -27.9 ± 3.9 to -24.7 ± 3.5%, respectively, both P < 0.01). Native T1 value also significantly elevated after chemotherapy (from 1283 ± 36 to 1308 ± 39 msec, P < 0.01). Among the 83 patients, 7 (8.4%) developed CTRCD. Of note, native T1 value before chemotherapy was significantly higher in patients with CTRCD than in those without it (1352 ± 29 vs. 1278 ± 30 msec, P < 0.01). The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that native T1 value was an independent predictive factor for the development of CTRCD [OR 2.33; 95%CI 1.15-4.75, P = 0.02].

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that CMR is useful to detect chemotherapy-related myocardial damage and predict for the development of CTRCD in breast cancer patients.

Cardio-oncology in Austria: cardiotoxicity and surveillance of anti-cancer therapies : Position paper of the Heart Failure Working Group of the Austrian Society of Cardiology

Survival in cancer is continuously improving due to evolving oncological treatment. Therefore, cardiovascular short-term and long-term side effects gain crucial importance for overall outcome. Cardiotoxicity not only presents as heart failure, but also as treatment-resistant hypertension, acute coronary ischemia with plaque rupture or vasospasm, thromboembolism, arrhythmia, pulmonary hypertension, diastolic dysfunction, acute myocarditis and others. Recent recommendations have proposed baseline cardiac risk assessment and surveillance strategies. Major challenges are the availability of monitoring and imaging resources, including echocardiography with speckle tracking longitudinal strain (GLS), serum biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides (NT-proBNP) and highly sensitive cardiac troponins. This Austrian consensus encompasses cardiotoxicity occurrence in frequent antiproliferative cancer drugs, radiotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiac follow-up considerations in cancer survivors in the context of the Austrian healthcare setting. It is important to optimize cardiovascular risk factors and pre-existing cardiac diseases without delaying oncological treatment. If left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) deteriorates during cancer treatment (from >10% to <50%), or myocardial strain decreases (>15% change in GLS), early initiation of cardioprotective therapies (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin or beta receptor blockers) is recommended, and LVEF should be reassessed before discontinuation. Lower LVEF cut-offs were recently shown to be feasible in breast cancer patients to enable optimal anticancer treatment. Interdisciplinary cardio-oncology cooperation is pivotal for optimal management of cancer patients.

Investigating the efficacy of osimertinib and crizotinib in phase 3 clinical trials on anti-cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity: are real-world studies the way forward?

BACKGROUND.

Oncology clinical trials demonstrate the risk of cardiotoxicity but are not sufficient to reveal the true risk. In this article, we compared the incidence of cardiotoxicity of crizotinib and osimertinib from a real-world study to data reported by phase 3 clinical trials.

METHODS.

Data from an ongoing real-world lung cancer study was used as a comparator. Patients were recruited retrospectively with the criteria of being diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer and having received at least a course of treatment of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor and/or immune check-point inhibitor. Characteristics of the patients who developed cardiotoxicity associated with osimertinib and crizotinib in the real-world lung cancer study were analysed against the inclusion criteria of the corresponding phase 3 clinical trials. Variations of cardiotoxicity incidence among the real-world lung cancer study and clinical trials were investigated.

RESULTS.

18%, n = 37/206, of the patients developed cardiotoxicity. QTc prolongation was the most frequently observed cardiotoxicity (n = 12/37). Osimertinib and crizotinib were the most cardiotoxic agents, each responsible for seven cases of cardiotoxicity. FLAURA, AURA3, PROFILE 1007 and PROFILE 1014 were the included clinical trials for analysis. None of the patients who developed cardiotoxicity in the real-world study would have been eligible to participate in FLAURA and PROFILE 1014 study whereas n = 4/7 and n = 5/7 patients were eligible to participate in AURA3 and PROFILE 1007 trials, respectively.

CONCLUSION.

Although phase 3 clinical trials play an important role in understanding the effectiveness and give insights on side-effect profiles, real-world studies can show the real risk of cardiotoxicity more accurately and realistically.

Detection of Profound Myocardial Damage by Cardiac MRI in a Patient with Severe Cardiotoxicity Induced by Anti-HER2 Therapy

Anti-HER2 therapy has greatly improved the long-term prognosis of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Meanwhile, by interfering with the protective effects of neuregulin-1/HER2 signaling on stressed cardiomyocytes, anti-HER2 therapy occasionally induces reversible cancer therapeutics-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parametric mapping or myocardial feature-tracking, in combination with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging, has the potential to detect changes in the myocardium in anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Here we report a breast cancer patient who experienced life-threatening CTRCD after treatment with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab. This case showed multiple transmural LGE-positive myocardial lesions in CMR imaging and high native T1 and T2 values in CMR parametric mapping, which was apparently more extensive than those observed in most patients with anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiac dysfunction. Consistent with profound myocardial damage indicated by CMR, her cardiac function was not fully restored despite intensive care and cardioprotective drug therapy. These findings suggest the potential usefulness of LGE imaging and parametric mapping by CMR for the assessment of myocardial injury to determine the clinical severity of anti-HER2 therapy-related cardiac dysfunction.

Heart failure prevention and monitoring strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer: a narrative review

Purpose

Cardiotoxicity from anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy carries a short- and long-term risk of incident heart failure and increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with breast cancer. Interruptions in anti-HER2 therapy due to cardiotoxicity can lead to suboptimal cancer treatment. The purpose of this narrative review is to outline opportunities to optimize cardiovascular care in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer to prevent interruptions in therapy.

Methods

This case-based review presents the current literature on evidence-based strategies for personalized cardiotoxicity risk assessment, risk mitigation interventions, cardiac function surveillance tools, and management of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction in breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy.

Results

Pretreatment cardiac risk assessment incorporates both treatment-related risk factors and patient-related risk factors for the development of cardiac dysfunction. Prevention and monitoring strategies while on treatment utilize risk factor modification, imaging and biomarker surveillance. Management of asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction due to anti-HER2 therapy is evolving. Permissive cardiotoxicity in asymptomatic patients while starting cardioprotective therapies requires close collaboration between oncology and cardiology, and referral to cardio-oncology if available.

Conclusions

Patient-centered, multimodal strategies to prevent, detect, and manage cardiotoxicity from anti-HER2 therapy are necessary to improve outcomes in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Summed rest score in gated myocardial perfusion imaging is a good predicator for treatment-related cardiotoxicity after anthracycline chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Anthracycline chemotherapy is commonly used in the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Treatment-related cardiotoxicity (TRC) is defined as when the patient is identified to have one of the following clinical manifestations: Symptomatic heart failure, cardiac death, arrhythmia, infarction, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of >15% from baseline or a decrease in LVEF of >10 to <50%. TRC may induce severe cardiac failure or cardiac arrhythmia as the main cause of death. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of the summed rest score (SRS) in gated myocardial perfusion imaging (G-MPI) for the early detection of TRC caused by anthracycline chemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. A total of 36 DLBCL patients were enrolled in the present study, and a series of parameters were compared at baseline and after chemotherapy. According to the occurrence of TRC during the observation period, the patients were divided into two groups, and parameters associated with cardiac function were compared. The SRS in G-MPI and the corrected QT interval in the electrocardiogram were significantly different before and after chemotherapy (P=0.012 and P=0.015, respectively). By comparing parameters associated with cardiac function between the TRC group (n=22) and the no-TRC group (n=14), it was found that only SRS was significantly different (P=0.012). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the SRS level was the only independent predicator for TRC (P=0.018; HR, 6.053; 95% CI, 1.364-26.869). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an optimal SRS cutoff of >1 for predicting TRC after anthracycline chemotherapy (P<0.001). Overall, the G-MPI SRS level was an early indicator for TRC surveillance in patients with DLBCL after anthracycline chemotherapy. The application of G-MPI SRS in clinical practice may contribute to early treatment and a subsequent decrease in mortality caused by such cardiovascular complications.

Cardio-oncology care in the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic: An International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) statement

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has given rise to a pandemic of unprecedented proportions in the modern era because of its highly contagious nature and impact on human health and society: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and established CV disease (CVD) are among those initially identified at the highest risk for serious complications, including death. Subsequent studies have pointed out that patients with cancer are also at high risk for a critical disease course. Therefore, the most vulnerable patients are seemingly those with both cancer and CVD, and a careful, unified approach in the evaluation and management of this patient population is especially needed in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. This review provides an overview of the unique implications of the viral outbreak for the field of cardio-oncology and outlines key modifications in the approach to this ever-increasing patient population. These modifications include a shift toward greater utilization of cardiac biomarkers and a more focused CV imaging approach in the broader context of modifications to typical practice pathways. The goal of this strategic adjustment is to minimize the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (or other future viral outbreaks) while not becoming negligent of CVD and its important impact on the overall outcomes of patients who are being treated for cancer.

Onco-Cardiology: Consensus Paper of the German Cardiac Society, the German Society for Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects and the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology

The acute and long-lasting side effects of modern multimodal tumour therapy significantly impair quality of life and survival of patients afflicted with malignancies. The key components of this therapy include radiotherapy, conventional chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. In addition to established tumour therapy strategies, up to 30 new therapies are approved each year with only incompletely characterised side effects. This consensus paper discusses the risk factors that contribute to the development of a potentially adverse reaction to tumour therapy and, in addition, defines specific side effect profiles for different treatment groups. The focus is on novel therapeutics and recommendations for the surveillance and treatment of specific patient groups.

Deceleration capacity of heart rate predicts trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: A prospective observational study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Trastuzumab is the standard choice for anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapy. Cardiotoxicity is one of the main adverse effects of trastuzumab. How to early predict trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity remains a significant problem in clinical practice. The deceleration capacity of the heart rate (DC) has been shown to be a powerful predictor of adverse outcomes in various heart diseases. In the study, the role of DC in early predicting trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity was investigated.

METHODS

A total of 150 patients were prospectively investigated the clinical value of the DC in predicting trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from June 2015 to June 2017. DC, mean heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV) indices, including the standard deviation of all normal RR intervals (SDNN) and the square root of the mean of the squared differences between adjacent normal RR intervals (RMSSD), were assessed before treatment, and the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was regularly monitored for 2 years (before, during and after treatment) to evaluate cardiotoxicity.

RESULTS

Among 150 eligible patients, 28 (18.7%) developed cardiotoxicity. Patients with cardiotoxicity were older (P < .05), higher anthracycline dose (P < .001) and had lower RMSSD (P < .05), SDNN, DC and baseline LVEF (P < .001), than patients without cardiotoxicity. Logistic regression analysis revealed lower DC, lower baseline LVEF and higher anthracycline dose were independent risk factors of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed a greater area under the curve for DC than for the baseline LVEF in predicting cardiotoxicity (0.88 vs 0.77, P = .032). Additionally, DC had higher sensitivity (78.6% vs 67.9%) and specificity (83.6% vs 77.9%) in predicting cardiotoxicity than the baseline LVEF. Linear regression analysis showed among patients who developed cardiotoxicity, lower DC was associated with an earlier onset (P < .01).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The present study found that DC was a stronger predictor of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity development than the baseline LVEF and HRV. Linear regression analysis showed among patients who developed cardiotoxicity, lower DC was associated with an earlier onset. DC should be a potential clinical indicator for the early prediction of trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity.

Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients with Cancer: Considerations, Clinical Implications, and Future Avenues

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

As the number of cancer survivors increases due to early screening and modern (antineoplastic) treatments, cancer treatment associated cardiotoxicity (CTAC) is becoming an increasing health burden that affects survival and quality of life among cancer survivors. Thus, clinicians need to identify adverse events early, in an effort to take suitable measures before the occurrence of permanent or irreversible cardiac dysfunction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Cardiac troponin (cTn) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) have been proven to detect subclinical cardiotoxicity during antineoplastic treatment. As such, these cardio-specific biomarkers could predict which patients are at risk of developing CTAC even before the start of therapy. Nevertheless, there are inconsistent data from published studies, and the recommendations regarding the use of these biomarkers and their validity are mostly based on expert consensus opinion. In this review, we summarize available literature that evaluates biomarkers of CTAC, and we encourage strategies that integrate circulating biomarkers and cardiac imaging in identifying cancer patients that are at high risk.

Cardiotoxicity Surveillance and Risk of Heart Failure During HER2 Targeted Therapy

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessments every 3 months for cardiotoxicity monitoring during human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) targeted therapy. Evidence in support of this practice is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study examines the association between adherence to cardiotoxicity surveillance guidelines and heart failure (HF) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A case-control study was performed in 53 patients who developed cardiotoxicity during HER2 targeted therapy, and 159 controls matched by age, anthracycline exposure, and year of treatment. Cardiotoxicity was defined as HF (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV) or cardiac death. Adherence to cardiotoxicity surveillance guidelines was ascertained from the beginning of HER2 targeted therapy to the diagnosis date of HF for cases or the corresponding timepoint for matched controls. Conditional logistic regression was used for case-control comparisons.

RESULTS

Eighty-one percent of cases and controls were previously treated with an anthracycline. Adherence to cardiotoxicity surveillance guidelines during the entire observation period or during the first 6 months of treatment was not associated with lower risk of HF. An LVEF <55% at any surveillance timepoint was identified in 49% of cases and 3% of controls, and an LVEF <55% during the final surveillance timepoint before developing HF was identified in 54% of cases and 4% of controls. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, LVEF <55% at any timepoint or during the final surveillance timepoint (odds ratio: 27.0; 95% confidence interval: 9.3 to 78.8 and odds ratio: 25.6; 95% confidence interval: 7.3 to 90.3, respectively) was associated with HF.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with LVEF <55% on routine surveillance during HER2 targeted therapy are at increased risk for HF. Additional studies to define their optimal management are warranted.

Cardiac monitoring in HER2-positive patients on trastuzumab treatment: A review and implications for clinical practice

Trastuzumab prolongs progression-free and overall survival in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer. However, trastuzumab treatment is hampered by cardiotoxicity, defined as a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decline with a reported incidence ranging from 3 to 27% depending on variable factors. Early identification of patients at increased risk of trastuzumab-induced myocardial damage is of great importance to prevent deterioration to irreversible cardiotoxicity. Although current cardiac monitoring with multi gated acquisition (MUGA) scanning and/or conventional 2D-echocardiography (2DE) have a high availability, their reproducibility are modest, and more sensitive and reliable techniques are needed such as 3D-echocardiography (3DE) and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). But which other diagnostic imaging modalities are available for patients before and during trastuzumab treatment? In addition, what is the optimal frequency and duration of cardiac monitoring? At last, which biomarker monitoring strategies are currently available for the identification of cardiotoxicity in patients treated with trastuzumab?

•

Current MUGA is not sensitive and reliable enough to detect cardiotoxicity early.

•

3DE (with STE) is most suitable for cardiac monitoring of patients on trastuzumab.

•

The optimal frequency and duration of cardiac monitoring is not yet established.

•

MPO and hs-troponin are promising biomarkers to detect cardiotoxicity.