Meta-analysis of transcatheter closure versus medical therapy for patent foramen ovale in prevention of recurrent neurological events after presumed paradoxical embolism

Patent Foramen Ovale and Atrial Septal Defect

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) and atrial septal defects (ASDs) are two types of interatrial communications with unique clinical presentations and management strategies. The PFO is a normal part of fetal development that typically closes shortly after birth but may persist in as many as 25% to 30% of adults. The communication between atria may result in paradoxic embolism and embolic stroke. On the other hand, ASDs (anatomically defined as secundum, primum, sinus venosus, and coronary sinus in order of prevalence) typically result in right heart volume overload and are often associated with other congenital defects. The diagnostic methods, treatment options including surgical and percutaneous approaches, and potential complications are described. Both conditions underline the significance of precise diagnosis and appropriate management to mitigate risks and ensure optimal patient outcomes.

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Outcomes and Costs Between Transesophageal Echocardiography-Guided and X-ray-Guided Percutaneous Atrial Septal Defect Closure in Children

This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes and costs between using either transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) or X-ray fluoroscopy for Percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) closure in children. An analysis was conducted on clinical data from children undergoing TEE-guided (n = 168) and X-ray-guided (n = 139) percutaneous ASD closure. Demographic characteristics, technical indices, acute complications, follow-up outcomes, and costs were compared between the groups. The results are that TEE-guided closure demonstrated shorter surgical times (20.3 ± 7.6 min vs. 32.8 ± 7.9 min, P < 0.001) and lower procedural costs ($3093.3 ± 451.5 vs. $3589.1 ± 219.4, P < 0.001) compared to X-ray guidance. Initial successful closure rates were similar between the groups (TEE: 98.2%, XR: 97.1%, P = 0.691). TEE guidance also resulted in fewer acute complications and reduced radiation exposure. TEE-guided percutaneous ASD closure offers advantages in terms of shorter surgical times, lower procedural costs, and reduced radiation exposure compared to X-ray guidance. These findings support the preference for TEE guidance in pediatric ASD closure procedures, with potential implications for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.

Experimental study of the bilateral asymmetric single-rivet occluder device for transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure with reserved interatrial septal puncture area

Purpose

To evaluate a noval bilateral asymmetric single-rivet occluder with reserved interatrial septal puncture area for treating patent foramen ovale (PFO).

Materials and methods

The study established a pig model of patent foramen ovale (PFO) by puncturing the oval fossa and then performing high-pressure balloon dilation. A specially designed bilateral asymmetric occluder for the reserved interatrial septal puncture area was then. used to close the PFO through catheter-based intervention. The pigs were kept for 3 months before undergoing a second catheter-based intervention, involving interatrial septal puncture using a newly developed occluder in the reserved interatrial septal puncture area. During 6 months, the experimental pigs underwent assessment using digital subtraction angiography (DSA), echocardiography, and histological evaluation.

Results

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) model was successfully established in 6 pigs using the puncture atrial septum high-pressure balloon dilation method. The diameter of the unclosed PFO was measured (3.56 ± 0.25 mm). Using the newly developed occluder device, all 6 pigs with unclosed PFO underwent successful catheter-based closure surgeries, with intraoperative and postoperative transesophageal echocardiography showing excellent device positioning and complete closure without residual shunting. After 3 months of implantation, the catheter-based interatrial septal puncture was performed through the reserved interatrial septal puncture area, and all procedures were successful. Immediately following euthanasia, a histological examination revealed intact and undamaged occluder devices with visible puncture holes in the reserved interatrial septal puncture area. No fracture of the nitinol wire was observed, and the surface of the occluder device showed coverage of endothelial and connective tissues. Utilizing a bilateral asymmetric single-rivet occluder device implanted through the reserved interatrial septal puncture area has proven effective in closing PFO. After implantation, the occluder device allows subsequent interatrial septal puncture procedures through the reserved area.

Conclusion

The novel occluder device demonstrated excellent closure performance, biocompatibility, and puncturability in the experiment. This indicates the feasibility of conducting further catheter-based interventions on the interatrial septum.

Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke and Outcomes Following Surgical Patent Foramen Ovale Closure Plus Medical Therapy vs. Medical Therapy Alone: An Umbrella Meta-Analysis of Eight Meta-Analyses Covering Seventeen Countries

Background

Cryptogenic stroke (CS) is an exclusion diagnosis that accounts for 10-40% of all ischemic strokes. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in 66% of patients with CS, while having a prevalence of 25-30% in the general population. The primary aim was to evaluate the risk of recurrent stroke following surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy vs. medical therapy alone amongst CS, an embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS), or transient ischemic attack (TIA). The secondary aim was to evaluate new-onset non-valvular atrial fibrillation, mortality, and major bleeding.

Methods

We conducted an umbrella meta-analysis using PRISMA guidelines on English studies comparing surgical PFO closure plus medical therapy versus medical therapy alone for managing CS. We extracted data on interventions and outcomes and used random-effects models with generic inverse variance to calculate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals for outcome calculations.

Results

A comprehensive search yielded 54,729 articles on CS and 65,001 on surgical PFO closure, with 1,591 studies focusing on PFO closure and medical therapy for secondary CS, ESUS, or TIA prevention. After excluding non-meta-analyses, 52 eligible meta-analyses were identified, and eight studies were selected for outcome evaluation, excluding non-English, non-human, and studies before January 2019 as of August 31, 2021. Among a total of 41,880 patients, 14,942 received PFO closure + medical therapy, while 26,938 patients received medical therapy alone. Our umbrella meta-analysis showed that PFO closure plus medical therapy had a 64% lower risk of recurrent strokes than medical therapy alone (pooled RR: 0.36). PFO closure plus medical therapy was associated with 4.94 times higher risk of atrial fibrillation. There was no difference in the risk of death or bleeding between both groups.

Conclusion

In patients with CS, PFO closure, in addition to medical therapy, reduces the risk of recurrence. More research is needed to assess the efficacy of early closure as well as specific risk profiles that would benefit from early intervention to reduce the burden of stroke.

Patent foramen ovale closure with the Occlutech Figulla flex II device: A long-term (up to 10-years) follow-up

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous closure represents the first line of treatment in patients with cryptogenic stroke and documented patent foramen ovale (PFO). Scarce data report the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing PFO closure with the Figulla Flex II device (Occlutech, Germany).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing PFO closure with a Figulla Flex II device at a single, high-volume Institution were included. Baseline clinical and procedural features were collected and patients were followed up for up to 10 years. The device's long-term safety was assessed, as well as mortality, recurrent cerebrovascular events, new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) and residual shunt.

RESULTS

Overall, 442 patients were included. The main indication for PFO closure was cryptogenic stroke/transitory ischemic attack (65.5%), followed by migraine (21.7%), silent lesions at MRI (10.8%), and decompression disease (2.0%). Atrial septal aneurysm was present in 20.8% of cases, Eustachian valve in 9.0%, Chiari network in 19.9%. The most frequently implanted device was the 23/25 mm (49.5% of cases). One procedural failure due to device embolization; in-hospital complications occurred in 15 cases (3.4%; 4 minor access site complications, 11 transient supraventricular tachycardias (SVT)/AF). After a follow-up of 9.2 years, 2 patients suffered recurrent TIA (with no residual R-L shunt detected). A moderate or severe residual shunt was observed in 3 patients after discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Figulla Flex II devices for PFO closure are associated with high procedural success and low incidence of adverse events even at long-term follow-up.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Residual Shunts after Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Long-Term Cerebrovascular Events

BACKGROUND

The association between a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke (CS) is well established, and the benefits of PFO closure are clearly recognized. This study aimed to investigate the presence of a residual shunt in patients who have experienced cryptogenic cerebrovascular events following a PFO closure.

METHODS

Two researchers systematically searched the PubMed and Embase online database for pertinent clinical studies published between January 2000 and July 2021 concerning the recurrence of cerebrovascular events after PFO closures.

RESULTS

Upon screening an initial list of 2,342 articles, six studies were identified, involving 2,083 patients. Overall, the analysis indicated a marked difference in the recurrence of cerebrovascular events in 8.89% of residual shunt (RS) cases compared to only 2.90% of non-RS cases. The summary odds ratio was 3.484 (95% confidence interval, 2.169-5.596), which suggested that RS may be a risk factor for recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients that experienced PFO-related cerebrovascular events within 6 months after PFO closure surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of RS significantly increases the risk of recurrent cerebrovascular events in patients with clinical PFO closure.

Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: Integrated Management

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common cardiac abnormality with a prevalence of 25% in the general population. PFO has been associated with the paradoxical embolism causing cryptogenic stroke and systemic embolization. Results from clinical trials, meta-analyses, and position papers support percutaneous PFO device closure (PPFOC), especially if interatrial septal aneurysms coexist and in the presence of large shunts in young patients. Remarkably, accurately evaluating patients to refer to the closure strategy is extremely important. However, the selection of patients for PFO closure is still not so clear. The aim of this review is to update and clarify which patients should be considered for closure treatment.

A Rare Ultra-Long-Term Complication of Occluder Recanalization Due to Spontaneous Perforation of Polyvinyl Alcohol Membrane of Atrial Septal Defect Occluder: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) has emerged as a feasible alternative strategy to surgical repair in many cardiac centers worldwide. Occluder recanalization due to device failure is a rare and severe complication that often occurs within weeks to years after ASD closure. We reported a rare ultra-long-term complication of occluder recanalization due to delayed spontaneous perforation of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) membrane of ASD occluder after 18 years of ASD closure. Surgical removal of the faulty device and reconstruction of the atrial septum with a bovine pericardial patch was performed. The patient was discharged and recovered uneventfully without syncope or residual shunt. The cause of this rare complication of spontaneous PVA membrane perforation of the occluder has not been fully detected. To our knowledge, this is the first report about PVA membrane perforation of an occluder that occurred soon after ASD closure.

Safety and Efficacy of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety and efficacy of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder in the closure of secundum type atrial septal defects.

BACKGROUND

The Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO; Abbott, St. Paul, MN) is an FDA-approved device for percutaneous closure of secundum type atrial septal defects (ASD). Previous small cohort trials have shown a favorable safety and technical efficacy profile.

METHODS

We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of all prospective case series and controlled trials that evaluated the ASO's safety and implant efficacy. The primary endpoint was the technical success rate of implantations. Secondary outcomes included proportions of arrhythmias and embolism specific-adverse events.

RESULTS

We included a total of 12 studies with 2972 patients. The ratio of device implantation was 2:1 by sex [female: male]. Pooled technical success rate of implantation was 98% (95% CI: 0.968-0.990, P < 0.01). The cumulative adverse event rate was 5.1% (95% CI: 0.035-0.068, P < 0.01), which included arrhythmia and embolism specific adverse event rates of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.007-0.032, P < 0.01) and 0.7% (95% CI: 0.002-0.013, P < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity analysis did not significantly affect pooled outcomes for success rate and adverse events; both forest plot and Begg's and Egger's regression tests supported symmetricity.

CONCLUSION

A high likelihood of technical success can be expected when implanting the ASO in secundum type ASDs. Adverse event rates are expected for one in twenty patients, and thus, our results support the safe use of ASO in secundum type ASDs closure.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

The AMPLATZER Septal Occluder is an FDA-approved device for percutaneous closure of secundum type atrial septal defects (ASD). We conducted a systemic review and meta-analysis of all prospective case series and controlled trials that evaluated the ASO's safety and implant efficacy. We included a total of 12 studies with 2972 patients. Pooled technical success rate of implantation was 98% (P < 0.01). The cumulative adverse event rate was 5.1% (P < 0.01), 1.8% (P < 0.01) rate of arrhythmias, and 0.7% (P < 0.01) rate of embolisms. A high likelihood of technical success can be expected with a low rate of adverse events.

How Old is Too Old? Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Older Patients

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces the risk of recurrent cryptogenic stroke specifically in younger patients. The three randomized controlled trials that led to the widespread adoption of PFO closure excluded patients over the age of 60 years. Older patients frequently have other cardiac and vascular conditions that are common risk factors for stroke, whereas paradoxical embolism through a PFO is relatively rare. Younger patients theoretically benefit the most from closure due to longer lifetime exposure risk and absence of other traditional risk factors. PFO in older patients with cryptogenic strokes is often encountered in clinical practice, making up an increasing number of cardiology referrals, yet cardiologists lack guidelines and evaluation tools for these patients. This review explores the history of PFO closure – emphasizing data in older adults – and discusses the evaluation and treatment of older people with cryptogenic stroke and PFO while further trials in this important population are awaited.

Persistent pathology of the patent foramen ovale: a review of the literature

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is an interatrial shunt, with a prevalence of 20-34% in the general population. While most people do not have secondary manifestations of a PFO, some reported sequelae include ischaemic stroke, migraine, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and decompression illness. Furthermore, in some cases, PFO closure should be considered for patients before neurosurgery and for patients with concomitant carcinoid syndrome. Recent trials support PFO closure for ischaemic stroke patients with high risk PFOs and absence of other identified stroke mechanisms. While PFOs can be associated with migraine with auras, with some patients reporting symptomatic improvement after closure, the evidence from randomised controlled trials is less clear in supporting the use of PFO closure for migraine treatment. PFO closure for other indications such as platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome, decompression illness and paradoxical embolism are based largely on case series with good clinical outcomes. PFO closure can be performed as a day surgical intervention with high procedural success and low risk of complications.

Patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke

Introduction: A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is highly prevalent among the adult population. It allows shunting of blood through the inter-atrial septum and has been associated with cryptogenic stroke, transient ischemic attack, platypnea-orthodeoxia syndrome, decompression sickness (e.g. deep-water divers), and migraines.Areas Covered: In this manuscript, we will review the anatomy of PFO with particular emphasis on the factors associated with increased risk of paradoxical embolization, as well as the different modalities for the diagnosis of PFO. We will discuss medical, surgical, and transcatheter therapy for secondary prevention in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke, and summarize the data from observational studies, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and meta-analysis of RCTs that have established the beneficial effect of transcatheter PFO closure in this patient population. Finally, we will provide a brief overview of the role of transcatheter PFO closure in patients with migraine.Expert Opinion: Transcatheter closure is the preferred treatment option in young (<60 years) patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke. A multi-disciplinary approach with input from clinical cardiologist, neurologist, hematologist, cardiac surgeon, and interventional cardiologist provides the best therapeutic plan for each patient taking into account the available data, but also medical, social, and occupational considerations.

Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Therapy After Patent Foramen Oval and Atrial Septal Defect Closure

Pathologies of the atrial septum include different interatrial communications varying from patent foramen ovale (PFO) to actual defects. Atrial septal defects (ASDs) may be localized within the fossa ovalis such as the secundum type ASD or outside the region of fossa ovalis, such as the ostium primum defect and sinus venosus defect. Over the last decades, the percutaneous closure of interatrial shunts has become a feasible and safe method. During these procedures, the delicate balance between thrombotic risk, device sealing process and bleeding risk is crucial. In this review, we sought to describe current available data on the antiplatelet and antithrombotic management of patients after percutaneous ASD or PFO closure.

Advances and ongoing controversies in PFO closure and cryptogenic stroke

Approximately one-third of strokes are cryptogenic in origin. These patients have a higher prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) compared to individuals with stroke of known origin. It has been proposed that some cryptogenic strokes (CSs) can be caused by paradoxical embolism across a PFO. PFOs can be treated medically with antithrombotic agents and percutaneously with occluder devices. Large randomized clinical trials have found transcatheter PFO closure to be superior to medical treatment for the prevention of recurrent stroke in young patients with CS. However, the superiority of PFO closure over medical treatment in unselected populations has not been demonstrated. In this chapter, we review the evidence supporting PFO closure and the selection of patients for such intervention.

Frequency, Trends, and Outcomes of Cerebrovascular Events Associated With Atrial Fibrillation Hospitalizations

The main objective is to estimate the frequency, temporal trends, and outcomes of cerebrovascular events associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) hospitalization in the United States. The national inpatient sample data was utilized to identify hospitalizations with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF from January 1, 2005 through September 31, 2015 for the present analysis. Jonckheere-Terpstra Trend was utilized to analyze trends from 2005 to 2015. Global Wald score was used to assess relative contributions of various covariates towards stroke among AF hospitalizations. Between the years 2005 and 2015, there were 36,457,323 (95.2%) AF hospitalizations without cerebrovascular events and 1,824,608 (4.8%) with cerebrovascular events included in the final analysis. There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of overall stroke, AIS, and AHS (p_trend value <0.001) per 1,000 AF hospitalizations. The frequency of stroke per 1,000 AF hospitalizations was highest among patients with CHA2DS2VASc score ≥3 and Charlson's comorbidity index ≥3. The trend of in-hospital mortality decreased during the study period, however, it remained higher in those with cerebrovascular events compared to those without. Lastly, hypertension, advancing age, and chronic lung disease were major stroke predicting factors among AF hospitalizations. These cerebrovascular events were associated with longer length of stay and higher costs. In conclusion, the incidence of cerebrovascular events associated with AF hospitalizations remained significantly high and the trend continues to ascend despite technological advancements. Strategies should improve to reduce the risk of AF-related stroke in the United States.

Advances and Ongoing Controversies in Patent Foramen Ovale Closure and Cryptogenic Stroke

Up to a third of strokes are cryptogenic. The prevalence of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in patients with cryptogenic stroke is higher than in individuals with stroke of known origin. It has been proposed that some cryptogenic strokes can be caused by paradoxic embolism across a PFO. The treatment of PFO includes medical treatment with antithrombotic agents and percutaneous PFO closure. There is limited evidence to support PFO closure in unselected cases of cryptogenic stroke. However, large randomized clinical trials confirmed the superiority of transcatheter PFO closure compared with medical treatment in young patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale: Current evidence and future perspectives

Recent prospective controlled studies have demonstrated that transcatheter closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) reduces recurrent stroke risk in select patients, especially in patients younger than 60 years with PFO and embolic-appearing infarct and where no other mechanism of stroke was identified. Detection of PFO depends on the intensity of the Valsalva maneuver, and not all PFOs can be diagnosed using transesophageal echocardiography. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography using abdominal compression during the Valsalva maneuver is an easy method that can increase the detection sensitivity of PFO shunt. PFO with two or more of the following factors is most likely considered a "high-risk PFO" and as such, has a significantly higher probability of cryptogenic stroke: (1) a long-tunnel PFO (≥10 mm in length), (2) atrial septal aneurysm and/or hypermobile interatrial septum, (3) prominent Eustachian valve or Chiari's network, (4) large right-to-left shunt at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver, and (5) low-angle PFO. In order to establish the benefit of catheter-based PFO closure as a safe and effective treatment in clinical practice, the degree of accuracy of PFO diagnosis and its long-term safety need to be confirmed.

Patent foramen ovale closure in children without cardiopathy: Child-PFO study

BACKGROUND

Closure of patent foramen ovale is well-managed in adults, but is performed less frequently in children.

AIM

To analyse all patent foramen ovale closures performed in the past 20 years in French paediatric centres.

METHODS

Retrospective study of patent foramen ovale closures in children without cardiopathy in nine centres between 2000 and 2019.

RESULTS

Forty-one procedures were carried out in children (median age: 14.9 years). Thirty-one patent foramen ovales were closed after a transient ischaemic attack or stroke, six for a left-to-right shunt and four for other reasons. Transthoracic echocardiography was used for 72.2% of the diagnoses and transoesophageal echocardiography for 27.8%. A substantial degree of shunting was found in 42.9% of patients and an atrial septal aneurysm in 56.2%. General anaesthesia with transoesophageal echocardiography guidance was performed in 68.3% of the procedures; local anaesthesia and transthoracic echocardiography or intracardiac echocardiography was performed in 31.7%. The success rate was 100%. The median fluoroscopy time was 4.14minutes: 3.55minutes with transoesophageal echocardiography; and 4.38minutes with transthoracic echocardiography (P=0.67). There was only one periprocedural complication (2.4%). Postoperatively, 80,5% of patients were treated with aspirin and 12,2% with an anticoagulant. The rate of complete occlusion was 56.8% immediately after the procedure, 68.6% at 1 year and 92.3% at the last follow-up. There were no delayed complications or cases of recurrent stroke during follow-up (median follow-up: 568 days).

CONCLUSION

Closure of patent foramen ovale in children appears to be safe and effective, as we noted a low rate of immediate complications, no delayed complications and no stroke recurrence in this indication.

Examining the evidence for PFO closure and novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of cryptogenic stroke

Introduction: There has been considerable study assessing the treatment of cryptogenic stroke (CS) recently. This review examines the role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in CS, while also discussing the evidence for alternative medical therapies in disease treatment.Areas covered: PFO closure for treatment of CS has been assessed in 6 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This review summarizes the background, results and limitations of these trials. Methodological and treatment-related differences in RCTs provide potential explanations for the discordance in outcomes observed between older (CLOSURE, PC, RESPECT-Early) and newer PFO closure trials (RESPECT-Late, CLOSE, REDUCE, DEFENSE-PFO). With regards to medical therapy for CS, two RCTs (NAVIGATE ESUS and RE-SPECT ESUS) did not show any benefit in recurrent stroke prevention with the use of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) compared with aspirin. Marked differences in baseline characteristics and rates of recurrent stroke between PFO closure and NOAC trials underlie the heterogeneous nature of CS.Expert commentary: In young patients with CS, PFO closure reduces the risk of recurrent stroke, with newer RCTs emphasizing the importance of identifying those with 'high-risk' PFO and the need for continued antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, treatment for CS should not be uniform but directed at disease-specific pathologies.

Recurrent Stroke Reduction with Patent Foramen Ovale Closure versus Medical Therapy Based on Patent Foramen Ovale Characteristics: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Efficacy of patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure in patients with cryptogenic stroke remains a matter of debate. We performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure versus medical therapy (MT) based on PFO characteristics. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the primary end points of stroke. After systematic search, six RCTs (3,747 patients) with 1,889 patients randomized to PFO closure and 1,858 patients randomized to the MT group were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, PFO closure was associated with a significant reduction in recurrent stroke compared to MT [RR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20-0.83]. While there were no differences in mortality or major bleeding between the two groups, risk of newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation was higher in the PFO closure group compared to MT [RR 5.29; 95% CI 2.32-12.06]. Further, risk reduction in stroke with PFO closure was significant in patients with high-risk PFO characteristics [RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.87] but not in low-risk patients [RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.29-1.84]. In conclusion, among patients with cryptogenic stroke, PFO closure is associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrent stroke compared to MT. Additionally, the benefit of PFO closure might be dependent on certain PFO characteristics.

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale: Randomized Trial Update

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is found in about one-quarter of all adults, but the prevalence increases to approximately half of those with a history of a so-called cryptogenic stroke. The true efficacy of PFO closure for prevention of recurrent paradoxical embolism has been debated for years, as the early 3 randomized trials did not show a statistically significant benefit of PFO closure over standard-of-care medical therapy. However, 3 recent randomized trials along with the long-term follow-up data from the largest early trial demonstrated superiority of device closure for secondary stroke prevention.

Cryptogenic Stroke and Patent Foramen Ovale

Nearly one-half of patients with cryptogenic stroke have a patent foramen ovale (PFO). The dilemma of whether to close these PFOs percutaneously, in an effort to reduce the risk of recurrent paradoxical embolism, has been a matter of ongoing debate for more than a decade. Early randomized clinical trials failed to demonstrate a significant benefit of percutaneous PFO closure for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in an intention-to-treat analysis. The long-term follow-up data from the RESPECT trial and 2 new randomized trials (CLOSE and REDUCE) have clarified these findings. They showed that with good patient selection, transcatheter PFO closure significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke compared with medical therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke, with no increased risk of serious adverse events or influence on major bleeding.

Management of Patients with Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Stroke: An Update

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common benign finding in healthy subjects, but its prevalence is higher in patients with stroke of unclear cause (cryptogenic stroke). PFO is believed to be associated with stroke through paradoxical embolism, and certain clinical and anatomical criteria seem to increase the likelihood of a PFO to be pathological. Recent trials have shown that closure of PFO, especially if associated with an atrial septal aneurysm and/or a large interatrial shunt, may reduce the risk of recurrent stroke as compared to medical treatment. However, it remains challenging to risk stratify patients with suspected PFO-related stroke and to decide if device closure is indicated. We sought to review contemporary evidence and to conclude an evidence-based strategy to prevent recurrence of PFO-related stroke.

[Patent foramen ovale with a license to kill]

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in about one of four, and one of its dangerous forms (large or associated with atrial septal aneurysm, Eustachian valve, or Chiari network) in one of twenty people. About 140 years ago, the PFO was shown to have the potential to result in death due to stroke and also myocardial infarction. The described decrease of the prevalence of a PFO with age may be a consequence of this. Therefore, it comes somewhat as a surprise that the PFO is taken rather lightly by the medical community. Percutaneous PFO closure with implantable devices has been around for over two decades and since then has proven to be the simplest and safest technique in interventional cardiology. Nonetheless, it is rarely applied and not recommended in current guidelines except for a few situations. Countless nonrandomised comparisons have invariably pointed to a clinical benefit of PFO closure in the secondary prevention of paradoxical cerebral events in patients with or without competitive reasons for stroke. Even a survival benefit of PFO closure was shown in a comparison over 10 years. However, the first three publications of randomised trials were not significant in the protocolled sense. PFO closure did reduce recurrent events compared to medical therapy by up to 80% but the statistical significance postulated was only reached in one of the three trials when the results were analyzed as treated or per predefined subgroups, like patients with atrial septal aneurysm, large PFO, or all PFO closure patients compared to treatment with acetylsalicylic acid only. Recently, a preplanned longer-term analysis of this trial and two additional randomised trials including higher risk PFOs reached the hypothesised statistical significance. This may be a turning point in the attitude towards PFO closure. In addition, PFO closure improves migraine and dyspnoea in certain patients. It appears, though, that it will take time until the full potential of PFO closure will be reflected in respective guidelines and reimbursement algorithms and adequately exploited by referring physicians (mostly neurologists) and interventional cardiologists. This reluctance will continue to cost innumerable preventable strokes, myocardial infarctions, and deaths around the world. The low risk of PFO closure must be weighed against even death if a PFO is left open; it is much more likely that one regrets not having closed a PFO than having closed it.

Patent Foramen Ovale: Story Closed?

The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) has been a matter of controversy for decades. After three randomized trials failed to show a benefit of closure with an excess of complications in the interventional arm, two large recent trials suggest a benefit with regard of preventing further ischemic strokes. With this discrepancy in results it is important to discuss recent trials in detail and evolve an informed clinical approach for daily practice.

Secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of our study is to compare patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical treatment and antiplatelet versus anticoagulant therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke (CS) and PFO. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) of randomized trials. Primary outcomes are stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes are peripheral embolism, bleeding, serious adverse events, myocardial infarction and atrial dysrhythmias. We performed an intention to treat meta-analysis with a random-effects model. We include six trials (3677 patients, mean age 47.3 years, 55.8% men). PFO closure is associated with a lower recurrence of stroke or TIA at a mean follow-up of 3.88 years compared to medical therapy [risk ratio (RR) 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81; I² = 40%]. The TSA confirms this result. No difference is found in mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.35-1.60; I² = 0%), while PFO closure is associated with a higher incidence of atrial dysrhythmias (RR 4.55, 95% CI 2.16-9.60; I² = 25%). The rate of the other outcomes is not different among the two groups. The comparison between anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy shows no difference in terms of stroke recurrence, mortality and bleeding. There is conclusive evidence that PFO closure reduces the recurrence of stroke or TIA in patients younger than 60 years of age with CS. More data are warranted to assess the consequences of the increase in atrial dysrhythmias and the advantage of PFO closure over anticoagulants.

Patent Foramen Ovale in Cryptogenic Stroke and Migraine with Aura: Does Size Matter?

Introduction: There is an association between cryptogenic strokes and patent foramen ovale (PFO), as well as between migraines with aura and PFO. The purpose of the current study was to compare shunt characteristics in the stroke and migraine populations.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the degree of the shunt in 68 consecutive patients with cryptogenic stroke (n=33) or migraines with aura (n=35) evaluated in a single transcranial Doppler laboratory. All patients underwent an intravenous injection of agitated saline, followed by the insonation of the middle cerebral artery to determine the degree of the right-to-left shunt. We graded the shunt size according to the number of emboli: Grade I, none; Grade II, 1-10; Grade III, 11-100; and Grade IV, >100. Grades I and II were considered low-grade shunts, and Grades III and IV were considered high-grade.

Results: In the 14-month study period, we found 31 high-grade shunts and 37 low-grade shunts. Among migraines with aura patients, 27 (77%) had high-grade shunts, whereas only 4 patients (12%) with cryptogenic stroke had high-grade shunts. These percentages were significantly different between groups (Fisher’s exact test, p<0.0001).

Conclusions: In a standardized laboratory using uniform methods, we found a significant difference in shunt size associated with PFO between cryptogenic stroke and migraine with aura patients. We hypothesize that in migraines with aura, venous admixture with arterial blood is the main mechanism by which PFO contributes to the condition. In contrast, cryptogenic strokes associated with PFO are more likely to arise from an atrial septal clot within the PFO space.

Management of patent foramen ovale in patients with cryptogenic stroke: Is device closure superior to medical treatment? A brief review

Background

Recent randomized controlled trial (RCTs) comparing percutaneous closure with antithrombotic treatment in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke revealed inconsistent results. Indeed, there is still no consensus on the management of these patients, namely closure or medical therapy treatment.

Methods

To take stock of the PFO management after cryptogenic stroke, we conducted a literature review that included 16 articles dealing with different therapeutic strategies and long-term outcomes of these results.

Results

The reviewed studies showed great methodological diversity rendering an exhaustive and balanced comparison between studies difficult. Low recurrence rates under prevention regimens, crossovers, procedure- and device-related complications, as well as inappropriate patient selection might explain the inconsistency of trials. However, despite the methodological heterogeneity certain patterns could be detected. It appears that device closure as secondary prevention measure is an effective and safe procedure reducing the recurrence of neurological events in cryptogenic stroke patients <60 years with large PFOs. Standardization of procedures and larger trials are needed to arrive to definitive conclusions.

Conclusion

In cryptogenic stroke patients <60 years with large PFOs, PFO closure seems to be safe and more effective compared to medical treatment alone. For all other patients group, for example, patients >60 years further trials are needed to clarify the role of PFO closure.

Patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke: An update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

It was under debate whether cryptogenic stroke patients benefited from patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. We sought to determine secondary prevention strategy in these patients.

METHODS

Scientific databases were searched for randomized controlled trials enrolling cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO who underwent PFO closure or medical therapy. The random-effect model was used to analyze the outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 6 trials enrolling 3630 participants in this meta-analysis. When compared with medical therapy, PFO closure reduced risks of recurrent stroke (risk ratio [RR] 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.93) and composite of stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.80). And no differences in all-cause death (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.37-1.72) and cardiovascular death (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.36-5.94) between 2 groups were observed. The risks of major bleeding (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.47-1.96) and any serious adverse event (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.16) did not differ between 2 groups. Yet, PFO closure increased risk of atrial fibrillation (RR 4.25, 95% CI 2.10-8.60).

CONCLUSION

PFO closure, as compared with medical therapy, was associated with decreased risk of recurrent stroke and increased risk of atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke patients with PFO.

Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after cryptogenic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVES

To examine long-term clinical outcomes with transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure versus medical therapy alone in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

BACKGROUND

A long-standing debate regarding the optimal approach for the management of patients with PFO after a cryptogenic stroke exists.

METHODS

An electronic search was performed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting clinical outcomes with PFO closure vs. medical therapy alone after stroke. Random effects DerSimonian-Laird risk ratios (RR) were calculated. The main outcome was recurrence of stroke. Other outcomes included transient ischemic attack (TIA), new-onset atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL), major bleeding, serious adverse events, and device-related complications. All-cause mortality was also examined.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with a total of 3,440 patients were included. At a mean follow-up of 4.02 ± 1.57 years, PFO closure was associated with less recurrence of stroke (RR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.19-0.91; P = .027) compared with medical therapy alone. No difference was observed between both strategies for TIA (P = .21), major bleeding (P = .69), serious adverse events (P = .35), and all-cause death (P = .48). However, PFO closure, was associated with increased new-onset AF/AFL (P < .001), risk of pulmonary embolism (P = .04), and device-related complications (P < .001). On a subgroup analysis, stroke recurrence rate remained lower in PFO closure arm regardless of the type of closure device used (P_interaction  = .50), or the presence of substantial shunt in the majority of study population (P_interaction  = .13).

CONCLUSIONS

Transcatheter PFO closure reduces the recurrence of stroke compared with medical therapy alone, with no significant safety concerns. Close follow-up of patients after PFO closure is recommended to detect new-onset atrial arrhythmias.

Reduced Stroke After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent randomized control trials (RCTs) have suggested benefit with transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure plus antiplatelet therapy over medical treatment alone for secondary stroke prevention.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data sources: we searched PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE from the inception until November 10, 2017 for RCTs comparing TPFO closure to medical therapy in patients with a PFO and a history of cryptogenic stroke.

RESULTS

Five RCTs with 3,627 patients (TPFO closure = 1,829 versus medical therapy =1,798) were included. There was a decreased number of post-TPFO closure strokes compared to the medical therapy arm; 53 versus 80 strokes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.61, CI: 0.39-0.94, P = 0.03, I² = 17%). Transient ischemic attacks occurred in 43 patients after TPFO closure versus 60 patients in the medical therapy group (OR = 0.80, CI: 0.53-1.19, P = 0.26, I² = 0%). There was a higher incidence of atrial fibrillation in the TPFO closure group, which occurred in 75 patients, compared to 12 patients in the medical therapy group (OR = 5.23, CI: 2.17-12.59, P = 0.0002, I² = 43%). There was a trend toward a decreased number of neuropsychiatric events in the TPFO closure closure group compared to the medical therapy group; 42 versus 67 neuropsychiatric events (OR = 0.71, CI: 0.48-1.06, P = 0.09, I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

TPFO closure plus antiplatelet therapy is superior to medical therapy in patients with a PFO and cryptogenic stroke. PFO closure is associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation and a trend toward reduced neuropsychiatric events.

Device Closure Versus Medical Therapy Alone for Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The optimal strategy for preventing recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke and patent foramen ovale (PFO) is unknown.

Purpose

To compare transcatheter PFO closure with medical therapy alone for prevention of recurrent stroke in patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke.

Data Sources

PubMed and the Cochrane Library (without language restrictions) from inception to October 2017, reference lists, and abstracts from cardiology meetings.

Study Selection

Randomized trials enrolling adults with PFO and cryptogenic stroke that compared stroke outcomes (main outcome) and potential harms in those receiving transcatheter device closure versus medical therapy alone.

Data Extraction

Two investigators independently extracted study data and rated risk of bias.

Data Synthesis

Of 5 trials, 1 was excluded because it used a device that is no longer available due to high rates of complications and failure. Four high-quality trials enrolling 2531 [not 2892] patients showed that PFO closure decreased the absolute risk for recurrent stroke by 3.3% [not 3.2%] (risk difference [RD], −0.033 [95% CI, −0.062 to −0.004]) [not −0.032 (95% CI, −0.050 to −0.014)] compared with medical therapy. The treatment strategies did not differ in rates of transient ischemic attack or major bleeding. Closure of PFOs was associated with higher rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) than medical therapy alone in all trials, but this outcome had marked between-trial heterogeneity (I2 = 81.9%), and high event rates in some groups resulted in extreme values for CIs.

Limitation

Heterogeneity of device type and antithrombotic therapy across trials, small numbers for some outcomes, and heterogeneous and inconclusive AF results.

Conclusion

In patients with PFO and cryptogenic stroke, transcatheter device closure decreases risk for recurrent stroke compared with medical therapy alone. Because recurrent stroke rates are low even with medical therapy alone and PFO closure might affect AF risk, shared decision making is crucial for this treatment.

Primary Funding Source

None.