The LEVANT I (Lutonix Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for the Prevention of Femoropopliteal Restenosis) Trial for Femoropopliteal Revascularization

Two-year outcome of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of long and complex femoropopliteal lesions

BACKGROUND

To investigate the long-term efficacy of the paclitaxel-eluting Legflow balloon catheter in the treatment of "real-world" long and complex femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

The REFLOW study was a prospective, multi-national, non-randomized, single arm study evaluating the long-term safety and efficacy of the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon dilatation catheter in the treatment of stenotic or occlusive lesions >150 mm long in the femoropopliteal arteries of symptomatic patients (Rutherford 2-5). A total of 120 study subjects were enrolled in a period of 30 months, between October 2015 and May 2018. The mean age was 71.1 years and 79 patients were men (65.8%). Mean lesion length was 216.1 mm. 45.0% of the lesions were occluded, whereas 55.0% were stenotic. For this extended study follow-up, 100 out of 120 patients agreed to participate. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 24 months, defined as absence of a hemodynamically significant stenosis on duplex ultrasound (systolic velocity ratio no greater than 2.4) at the target lesion and without TLR within 24 months.

RESULTS

Primary patency was 70.50% at 2 year. Freedom from TLR was 76.10% at 2 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer term follow-up confirms there is no safety-concern on this paclitaxel device. The excellent results of the newer drug-eluting devices, and the Legflow paclitaxel-eluting balloon in particular, is a valid and effective alternative to treat long and complex "real-world" femoropopliteal lesions.

Novel Therapeutic Concepts for Complex Femoropopliteal Lesions Using the Jetstream Atherectomy System

INTRODUCTION

The presence of severe arterial calcification is associated with less favorable outcomes in terms of procedural and clinical success as well as higher rates of major adverse limb events. Recent studies incorporating rotational atherectomy for effective preparation of severely calcified lesions demonstrate beneficial procedural outcomes by obtaining maximal luminal gain and improved long-term outcomes.

METHODS

This prospective single-center, observational study includes patients with severely calcified femoropopliteal lesions with chronic limb ischemia Rutherford 1-5 between January 2017 and July 2019, who underwent atherectomy using the Jetstream Atherectomy system, followed by drug-coated balloon angioplasty. Lesion calcification was categorized by the Peripheral Arterial Calcium Scoring System (PACSS), whereas lesion complexity was classified by the Transatlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). Safety and efficacy aspects in terms of vessel injury, thromboembolism, and clinical success were systematically analyzed up to 12 months of follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

In 162 consecutive patients, 210 non-stented and 22 stented lesions were treated. Twelve (7.4%) patients received bail-out stenting. Mean lesion length was 24.2±4.8 cm; 51% were chronic total occlusions (mean occlusion length 18.2±5.1 cm). TASC C lesions were present in 38 patients (23.5%) and TASC D lesions in 124 patients (76.5%). The mean PACCS score was 3.3±0.9. Device success was achieved in 88%; procedural success was noted in 99% of the lesions. Embolic protection device was used in 11.7%. Perforation or dissection occurred in none of the cases. Asymptomatic peripheral embolization was noted in 10 patients (6.2%). Clinical FU at 12 months was available in 157 of 162 patients (96.9%). At 12 month FU, (1) mean Rutherford classification at baseline of 3.7±0.6 significantly dropped to 1.0±0.9 (p<0.05), (2) baseline mean anke-brachial index (ABI) of 0.4±0.1 significantly increased to 0.8±0.2 (p<0.05), (3) 92.6% were free from target lesion revascularization (TLR), (4) 95.1% were free from target vessel revascularization (TVR), and (5) binary restenosis measured by duplex occurred in 22 patients (13.6%). Multivariate analyses showed lesion length as predictive of stent placement (p=0.02), whereas both lesion length (p=0.006) and PACCS score (p=0.02) are predictive of clinical success.

CONCLUSION

Rotational atherectomy in combination with drug-coated balloon (DCB) can be safely performed in long, calcified (non-) occlusive lesions with a relatively low rate of bail-out stenting and favorable clinical mid-term results.

CLINICAL IMPACT

In this prospective, single arm study we demonstrated that combination treatment using rotational atherectomy and DCB is safe and effective in complex and calcified TASC C/D femoropopliteal lesions in patients with claudication or CLTI in a real-world clinical setting. Despite mean lesion length of >20cm and a relatively high rate of chronic total occlusions, the rate of bail-out stenting was surprisingly low (7.4%), whereas the rates of freedom from TLR and TVR were surprisingly high. Thus, our study may encourage vascular specialists to choose an endovascular -first approach even in such complex and calcified femoropopliteal lesions and occlusions in daily clinical practice.

Comparison of clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloons angioplasty vs. plain old balloons angioplasty for peripheral arterial disease: an umbrella meta-analysis

Background

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) affects millions globally, causing significant morbidity. Traditional treatments like plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) have limited success due to high restenosis rates. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCBA) has emerged as a promising alternative, locally delivering antiproliferative drugs like paclitaxel to reduce restenosis. However, the clinical outcomes of DCBA compared to POBA remain inconsistent across various studies.

Objective

This umbrella meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of DCBA and POBA in PAD patients, synthesizing data from multiple meta-analyses to provide a more robust evidence base.

Methods

We conducted an umbrella meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, systematically reviewing Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Studies were included if they compared DCBA and POBA in PAD patients, focusing on primary outcomes such as target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency (PP), all-cause mortality (ACM), and amputation. Secondary outcomes included restenosis, late lumen loss (LLL), and major adverse events (MAE).

Results

Sixteen meta-analyses were included. DCBA significantly reduced the risk of TLR (OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.34-0.49), PP was significantly higher in DCBA (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.53-2.75), and restenosis was lower (OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.41-0.51). No significant differences were found in ACM or amputation risk between the two groups. Heterogeneity was moderate to high across most outcomes.

Conclusion

DCBA provides significant advantages over POBA in reducing TLR and restenosis while maintaining vessel patency. However, the effects on ACM and amputation remain inconclusive. Future research should focus on long-term safety and identifying which patient subgroups benefit most from DCBA.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO [CRD42024591967].

Mean Pressure Gradient and Fractional Flow Reserve at A Superficial Femoral Artery Dissection after Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty

OBJECTIVES

Residual dissection is a concern in endovascular treatment with a DCB, and there is limited knowledge of hemodynamics at a dissection lesion. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the mean pressure gradient (MPG) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) at a residual dissection after DCB angioplasty for the superficial femoral artery (SFA).

METHODS

A total of 59 cases with residual SFA dissection treated with DCB angioplasty at a single center were analyzed retrospectively. The dissection was classified into 6 types (A-F). The primary endpoints were MPG and FFR at a residual dissection lesion after DCB angioplasty, using evaluation with a pressure wire.

RESULTS

The median lesion length was 70 (40-130) mm with 24% popliteal involvement, and 11 cases (18%) had chronic total occlusion. A completion angiogram revealed dissection of types A (n = 33, 56%), B (n = 18, 31%), C (n = 7, 12%), and D (n = 1, 2%). The median MPGs in type A, B, and C cases were 0 (0-2), 0 (0-4), and 3 (0-6) mmHg, with a significant lower in type C cases than in type A cases (A vs C, P = .021). The median FFRs in type A, B, and C cases of 1.0 (.98-1.00), 1.0 (.96-1.00), and .98 (.95-1.00) did not differ significantly among dissection types (A vs B, P = .86; A vs C, P = .055; B vs C, P = .15).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of hemodynamics at a SFA dissection. The results suggest that low-grade dissection (types A or B) does not affect MPG and FFR at a SFA lesion. This indicates that a bailout stent may be unnecessary for patients with dissection of types A or B. A further investigation is needed to determine whether a scaffold is required for a SFA lesion with type C dissection.

"Evolution of Drug-Coated Devices for the Treatment of Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia"

For patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia (CLTI), endovascular approaches to revascularization are often employed as a component of multimodality care aimed at limb preservation. However, patients with CLTI are also prone to treatment failure, particularly following balloon angioplasty alone. Drug-coated devices utilizing Paclitaxel were developed to decrease restenosis but have been primarily studied in patients presenting with claudication. In recent years, data have emerged which describe the efficacy of drug-coated devices in the treatment of patients with CLTI. Concurrently, there has been major controversy surrounding the use of drug-coated devices in peripheral arterial disease. A historical narrative of the development and use of drug-coated devices for peripheral arterial disease is presented, along with discussion of major trials. Evidence argues that paclitaxel-based therapies for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) do not increase mortality risk compared to nondrug-coated devices. In CLTI patients, paclitaxel-based balloons and stents provide superior patency and freedom reintervention compared to nondrug-coated devices when treating femoropopliteal disease. However, the use of Paclitaxel-based therapies for below-the-knee (BTK) interventions has not been shown to provide clinically meaningful outcomes compared to nondrug-based therapies. Newer generation antiproliferative agents (Sirolimus, Everolimus) and delivery systems (bioabsorbable scaffolds) hold promise for BTK interventions with early data suggesting decreased rates of major amputation or major adverse limb events.

Long-term comparison of rotational and directional atherectomy outcomes in patients with femoropopliteal lesions

Objective: This study aims to elucidate the differences in vessel patency rates, procedural complications, and the need for repeat interventions between these two techniques, thereby providing insights into the optimal atherectomy strategy for managing peripheral arterial disease in the femoropopliteal segment. Material and Methods: This retrospective study investigated the long-term effectiveness of two atherectomy techniques, rotational atherectomy (RA) and directional atherectomy (DA), in treating lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) affecting the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and popliteal arteries. A total of 134 patients with symptomatic LE-PAD and significant stenosis (70%-99%) were included and divided into two groups based on the atherectomy method used. Both groups underwent similar pre- and post-atherectomy procedures, including drug-coated balloon angioplasty. The primary outcome measure was clinical success, defined as procedural success and an improvement in Rutherford classification at 1 year. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups, with no significant differences in demographics or lesion characteristics, except for a higher proportion of right-sided lesions in the DA group. While both RA and DA effectively improved ankle-brachial index (ABI) and Rutherford classification at 12 months, RA demonstrated superior long-term benefits, with significantly higher ABI at 24 months and a greater proportion of asymptomatic patients. Although RA had a longer procedural duration and a higher incidence of dissection, it resulted in lower residual stenosis and fewer cases of treated segment thrombosis than DA. Both RA and DA are effective treatment options for femoropopliteal lesions, but RA may offer advantages in long-term symptom management and vessel patency. Conclusion: Both rotational and directional atherectomy effectively treat femoropopliteal lesions, with rotational atherectomy demonstrating superior long-term outcomes in terms of symptom management and vessel patency. Despite longer procedural times and a slightly higher risk of dissection, rotational atherectomy resulted in lower residual stenosis and fewer cases of treated segment thrombosis than directional atherectomy.

Comparative Study between Mechanical Rotational Atherectomy Combined with Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Coated Balloon Alone for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis during Peripheral Endovascular Interventions: A Multicentric Trial

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous mechanical debulking (PMD) using mechanical rotational atherectomy combined with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus using paclitaxel DCB alone in the treatment of in-stent restenosis. Material and Methods: This is a multicentric retrospective observational study conducted over a period of 2 years from 2020 to 2022. The study included 49 patients presented with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) associated with in-stent restenosis, either acute (<14 days), subacute (<3 months) or chronic (>3 months). The enrolled patients underwent endovascular revascularization using either PMD combined with paclitaxel DCB or paclitaxel DCB only. They were followed up for 6 months after the intervention clinically and by duplex evaluation. Results: The lesion length was about 14.2 mm in the group treated by PMD+ DCB and 9.3 mm in the group treated by DCB alone. The technical success rate was the same between the two groups. However, the follow-up after 6 months showed that patencies for PMD + DCB and DCB alone were 15 (68.2%) patients and 15 (55.6%) patients, respectively (significant p value = 0.028). Procedural-related complications for PMD + DCB are distal embolization (9%) of cases and no vessel perforation. Regarding the candidates who were treated by DCB alone, there were minor groin hematomas (11.1%), distal arterial thrombosis (11.1%) and contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (11.1%) cases. Conclusion: The endovascular management of in-stent restenosis using percutaneous mechanical debulking (PMD) in conjunction with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) showed that PMD combined with DCB is a safe and effective modality for achieving recanalization. It gives a satisfactory outcome in terms of technical success, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate (CD-TLR) and mortality. Despite these promising results, further research with a large enrolled population may be required to determine the cost/benefit.

Retrospective analysis on diameters of drug-coated balloons and predilatation balloons in infra-inguinal endovascular treatment (RABBIT study)

This multicenter retrospective study assessed the clinical outcomes of endovascular therapy (EVT) using a drug-coated balloon (DCB) that was larger than the predilatation balloons for femoropopliteal artery lesions. We analyzed 1140 cases with symptomatic peripheral artery disease that underwent EVT with DCB for femoropopliteal lesions between 2017 and 2021. The primary endpoint was procedural failure, defined as a composite of deteriorated dissection and bailout stenting. The secondary endpoints included deteriorated dissection, bailout stenting, restenosis, and target lesion revascularization. We performed propensity score matching to compare the clinical outcomes between EVT with a DCB which was larger than the predilatation balloon (larger DCB) and EVT with a DCB which was not (nonlarger DCB). We assigned 276 cases to the larger DCB group and 864 cases to the nonlarger DCB group. Procedural failure was observed in 75 cases, whereas restenosis occurred in 282 cases during a mean follow-up period of 12.7 ± 9.7 months. Propensity score matching extracted 273 pairs with no intergroup difference in baseline characteristics, except the predilatation balloon size. Procedural failure (9.2% versus 6.1%, P = 0.11), deteriorated dissection and bailout stenting proportion (both P > 0.05), and 1-year rates of freedom from restenosis (82.4% versus 84.1%, P = 0.59) and target lesion revascularization (89.7% versus 90.4%, P = 0.83) showed no significant difference between the larger and nonlarger DCB groups. Irrespective of whether the DCB size was larger than the predilatation balloon, no difference was observed in either procedural or clinical outcomes.

DETOUR2 trial outcomes demonstrate clinical utility of percutaneous transmural bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex femoropopliteal disease

OBJECTIVE

Percutaneous transmural arterial bypass (PTAB) using the DETOUR system aims to create a percutaneous, endovascular femoropopliteal bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery disease. The goal of the DETOUR2 study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the therapy in comparison with pre-established performance goals.

METHODS

The DETOUR2 investigational device exemption study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international trial of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients (Rutherford classes 3-5) undergoing the DETOUR procedure for long segment (>20 cm) superficial femoral artery disease. Prespecified end points included primary safety (composite of major adverse events) at 30 days, and effectiveness (primary patency defined as freedom from restenosis or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year.

RESULTS

We enrolled 202 patients at 32 sites with 200 treated with the DETOUR system. The mean lesion length was 32.7 cm, of which 96% were chronic total occlusions (CTO) and 70% were severely calcified. Technical success was achieved in 100% of treated patients. The primary safety end point was met with a 30-day freedom from major adverse event rate of 93.0%. The 1-year primary effectiveness end point was met with 72.1% primary patency at 12 months. Primary-assisted and secondary patency were 77.7% and 89.0%, respectively, at 12 months. The 12 month deep venous thrombosis incidence was 4.1% with no pulmonary emboli reported. Venous quality-of-life scores showed no significant changes from baseline. There was a Rutherford improvement of at least one class through 12 months in 97.2% of patients. The mean ankle-brachial index also improved from 0.61 to 0.95 during this period. There were marked improvements in quality-of-life and functional status measures.

CONCLUSIONS

The DETOUR2 study met both the primary safety and effectiveness end points, demonstrating clinical usefulness of this novel therapeutic strategy in long femoropopliteal lesions.

Safety and Effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon Catheter in Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization in the Korean Population: A Multicenter Post-Market Surveillance Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) in endovascular revascularization procedures under real-world conditions in a Korean population with atherosclerotic disease of the infrainguinal arteries, including below-the-knee (BTK) arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight institutions in the Republic of Korea participated in this prospective, multicenter, single-arm, post-market surveillance study. Two hundred patients with Rutherford class 2-5 peripheral arterial disease and infrainguinal lesions suitable for endovascular treatment were competitively enrolled. Data were collected at baseline, the time of intervention, discharge, and 1-, 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up visits. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from major adverse events (MAE) within 6 months (except when limiting the time frame for procedure- or device-related mortality to within 30 days), and the primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) within 12 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients with 332 target lesions were analyzed. Two-thirds of the patients had diabetes mellitus, and 41.6% had chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The median target lesion length was 100 mm (interquartile range: 56-133 mm). Of the target lesions, 35.2% were occlusions, and 14.8% were located in the BTK arteries. Rate of freedom from MAE was 97.9% at 6 months, and the rate of freedom from CD-TLR was 95.0% and 92.2% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis of 43 patients and 49 target lesions involving the BTK arteries showed rate of freedom from MAE of 92.8% at 6 months and rates of freedom from CD-TLR of 88.8% and 84.4% at 12 and 24 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of the present study, including the BTK subgroup analysis, showed outcomes comparable to those of other DCB studies, confirming the safety and effectiveness of Passeo-18 Lux DCB in the Korean population.

Twenty-Four-Month Safety and Effectiveness of TCD-17187 Drug-Coated Balloon for Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Artery

PURPOSE

In the present trial, the 24-month safety and effectiveness of the TCD-17187 drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and proximal popliteal artery (PA) were evaluated in Japanese patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, core laboratory-adjudicated, single-arm trial. From 2019 to 2020, 121 patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease were enrolled. The primary effectiveness outcome measure was primary patency. The safety outcome measure was the major adverse event (MAE) rate.

RESULTS

Age was 74.5 ± 7.3 years, and diabetes mellitus was present in 67.5%. Lesion length and reference vessel diameter (RVD) were 106.0 ± 52.6 mm and 5.2 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) and bilateral calcification rate (Grade 3 and 4 by peripheral arterial calcium scoring system (PACSS)) were 17.5% and 50.8%, respectively. The 24-month primary patency rate by duplex ultrasound was 71.3%, while freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) was 87.0%. The MAE rate was 13.2% and all events consisted of CD-TLR. There were no instances of device- or procedure-related deaths major amputations throughout the 24 months. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed significant differences associated with loss of primary patency in the following characteristics: CTO, restenotic lesion and RVD.

CONCLUSION

This trial confirmed the safety and effectiveness of TCD-17187 DCB for atherosclerotic lesions of the SFA and/or proximal PA for up to 24 months.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Cohort study.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://center6.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr.cgi?function=brows&action=brows&recptno=R000038612&type=summary&language=J:Registration ID: UMIN000034122. Registration Date: September 13, 2018.

Matched comparison of uncoated and paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for isolated popliteal lesions excluding bail-out stenting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) in isolated popliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

The benefit of using DCB in femoropopliteal arteries including the proximal popliteal artery has been demonstrated, but has not yet been evaluated for isolated popliteal lesions.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study includes patients requiring treatment with DCB of isolated popliteal lesions. Two cohorts matched (Plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) versus DCB) by their baseline and lesion characteristics were compared. Lesions receiving bail-out stents were excluded. Primary endpoint was the 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate. Secondary endpoints included the procedural success and complication rate, primary patency, changes in Rutherford-Becker class (RBC) and ankle-brachial index (ABI).

RESULTS

One hundred and seven patients were included in this study. More than one third of the patients had critical limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) (35 % (POBA) versus 40.4 % (DCB), p = 0.354. The technical success rate of the procedure was 85.1 % (n = 40/47) in the DCB group and 83.3 % (n = 60) in the POBA group (p = 0.510). There were three complications in the POBA group (5.0 %) but none in the DCB group (p = 0.172). After 12 months, in the entire cohort 14 patients (13.1 %) had to undergo a TLR. The TLR-free survival was 81.7 % in the POBA and 93.6 % in the DCB group (p = 0.060). Primary patency rates after POBA and DCB were 65.1 % and 87.5 % at 6 months (p = 0.024), respectively. At 12 months, the patency rates were 71.7 % and 85.1 % (p = 0.076), respectively. For both treatment arms, there was a significant improvement in ABI and RBC compared to baseline. Four patients from the DCB group and two from the POBA group received a minor amputation (p = 0.232). One patient in the DCB group died within 12 months.

CONCLUSION

After one year the use of DCB is by trend more effective for the treatment of isolated popliteal stenosis compared to POBA. A larger scale prospective study is mandatory.

A registry-based study of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of the femoral-popliteal artery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report the results of a prospective, single-arm, registry-based study assessing the safety and performance of a paclitaxel drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery in-stent restenosis (ISR) in a United States population.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, single-arm, post-market registry of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB for the treatment of ISR lesions in the SFA or popliteal artery at 43 sites within the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Registry from December 2016 to January 2020. Clinical outcomes were assessed at 12, 24, and 36 months. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included technical success, target vessel revascularization, major limb amputation, and all-cause mortality. Results are presented as survival probabilities based on Kaplan-Meier survival estimates.

RESULTS

Patients (N = 300) were 58% male, with a mean age of 68 ± 10 years. Diabetes was present in 56%, 80% presented with claudication, and 20% with rest pain. Lesions included ISR of the SFA in 68%, SFA-popliteal in 26%, and popliteal arteries in 7%. The mean lesion length was 17.8 ± 11.8 cm. Lesions were categorized as occlusions in 43% (mean occluded length, 16 ± 10 cm). TASC type was A (17%), B (29%), C (38%), and D (15%). Technical success was 99%. Re-stenting was performed in 5% and thrombolysis in 0.6% of patients. Kaplan-Meier estimates for freedom from target lesion revascularization were 90%, 72%, and 62% at 12, 24, and 36 months. Freedom from target vessel revascularization was 88%, 68%, and 59% and freedom from major target limb amputation was 99.6%, 98.9%, and 98.9%, respectively, at 12, 24, and 36 months. Survival was 95%, 89%, and 85% at 12, 24, and 36 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This post-market registry-based study shows promising results in treating femoral-popliteal ISR with paclitaxel DCB in comparison to the results of plain balloon angioplasty reported in the literature. These results demonstrate the ability of the SVS VQI to conduct post-market evaluation of peripheral devices in partnership with industry and federal regulators.

Long-Term Follow-up and Mortality Rate of Patients of the Randomized Freeway Stent Study

PURPOSE

This follow-up study was designed as a reopen of the completed Freeway Stent Study and collected mortality and clinical outcome data for at least 5 years after enrollment to evaluate long-term patient safety and treatment efficacy. The primary study enrolled 204 patients with stenosis or occlusion in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery. Patients were randomized to primary nitinol stenting followed by standard PTA or primary nitinol stenting followed by FREEWAY™ paclitaxel-eluting balloon PTA.

METHODS

Previous patients were recontacted by phone or during a routine hospital visit, and medical records were reviewed. Vital and clinical status information was collected.

RESULTS

No increased late mortality was observed at 5 years, with an all-cause mortality rate of 12.0% in the FREEWAY drug-eluting balloon group versus 15.0% in the non-paclitaxel PTA group. No accumulation of any cause of death was observed in either group, nor was there any correlation with the dose of paclitaxel used. Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 5 years was significantly higher in the FREEWAY drug eluting balloon group (85.3%) compared to standard PTA group (72.7%) Log-rank p = 0.032.

CONCLUSION

The safety results presented support the recent conclusions that the use of paclitaxel technology does not lead to an increase in mortality. At the same time, the efficacy results clearly demonstrate that the potential benefits of drug-eluting balloon treatment are maintained over a 5-year period.

Efficacy Analysis of Drug-Coated Balloons in the Treatment of Ultra-Long Segment Lesions of Femoral Popliteal Artery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the midterm clinical efficacy of paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in the treatment of femoral artery TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) grades C/D lesions.

METHODS

The clinical data of 73 cases with TASC grades C/D lesions of femoral artery treated with paclitaxel DCBs at the Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Hospital of Fujian Medical University from August 2016 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the primary patency rate. The secondary endpoints were freedom from reintervention, Rutherford classification, ankle-brachial index (ABI), amputation events, and all-cause death.

RESULTS

A total of 73 cases of limb lesions received endoluminal treatment. The mean age of the patients including 49 males and 24 females was (72.66 ± 11.1) years, with an initial Rutherford classification of 2-5 and an ABI of 0.4 ± 0.1. The mean Rutherford classification was 3.70 ± 0.95. The mean lesion length was (25.75 ± 9.67) cm, including 61.64% chronic occlusive lesions and 27.39% stenotic lesions, the remaining 10.97% were mixed lesions, containing multiple segments of stenosis and chronic total occlusion lesions. 43.8% of the lesions were associated with severe calcification. Stent implantation rate was 8%. Overall mortality at follow-up was 4% at 1 year and 8% at 2 years, and no amputations seen. The ABI was 0.83 ± 0.07 at 1-year follow-up and 0.78 ± 0.05 at 2-year follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve predicted the 1-year phase I patency rate was 75.3% ± 5% and the 2-year patency rate was 63.3% ± 5.7%. Freedom from target lesion revascularization was 78.4 ± 4.9% at 1 year and 69.2% ± 3.6% at 2 years. Logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, severe calcification, chronic renal insufficiency, and restenosis were the significant factors affecting the patency of target lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel DCBs in the treatment of femoral artery with TASC grades C/D lesions can achieve relatively satisfactory midterm clinical safety and efficacy results, provided there is an acceptable result on completion angiogram.

Head-to-Head Comparison of 2 Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

There is a scarcity of published head-to-head comparisons between different paclitaxel-coated angioplasty balloons. More prospective safety data to support the health care economic reimbursement processes are needed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to report the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Biotronik AG) for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease caused by stenosis, restenosis, or occlusion of the femoral and/or popliteal arteries.

METHODS

A total of 302 patients were randomized 1:1 and assigned to the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (study device) group or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (control device, Medtronic Vascular) group for testing of noninferiority. The primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 12 months. The primary safety endpoint was a composite of freedom from device-/procedure-related death through 30 days postindex procedure, major target limb amputation, and clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, 130 of 134 patients in the IN.PACT Admiral group had freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (97.0%) compared with 137 of 141 patients in the Passeo-18 Lux group (97.2%). The primary safety endpoint showed 96.3% in the control group vs 95.7% in the study device group. The null hypothesis of inferiority on both efficacy and safety was rejected. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of primary patency at 1 year was 88.7% in the control arm vs 91.5% in the study device arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The Passeo-18 Lux and the IN.PACT Admiral DCBs demonstrate comparable results with excellent effectiveness and safety through 12 months for femoropopliteal interventions.

A Bayesian network meta-analysis for acute thrombosis after lower extremity artery endovascular treatment

BACKGROUND

Various endovascular treatment devices have been widely used in the lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD). Their patency efficiency for target lesions has been well studied and reported. Comparison of the risk of acute thrombosis events between the different endovascular treatment devices is unclear.

AIMS

To rank the risk of acute thrombosis events when bare metal stents (BMSs), covered stents (CSs), drug-eluting stents (DESs), drug-coated balloons (DCBs), and conventional percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA) are used to treat LEAD through Bayesian network meta-analysis.

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing the risk of 1-year postoperative acute thrombosis between BMSs, CSs, DESs, DCBs, and PTA for treating LEAD. Bayesian random models were used for pooled endovascular treatment modality comparisons. We ranked these treatment modalities via the Bayesian method according to their surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and estimated probabilities.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (38 study arms; 2758 patients) were included. The Bayesian network ranking of treatments indicated that DCB had the lowest risk of acute thrombosis, PTA had the second-lowest risk of thrombosis, and CS, BMS, and DES had the highest risk of thrombosis. Regarding the treatment efficacy, the OR values of the loss of primary patency were significantly lower for DCB (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.30-0.62), DES (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.14-0.94), and CS (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.18,0.56) than for PTA. When BMS was used as a reference, only the OR for CS was significantly lower (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.21-0.82). Correspondingly, the Bayesian ranking of treatments from better to worse target lesion primary patency was CS, DES, DCB, BMS, and PTA.

CONCLUSION

With the available research evidence and according to the network analysis ranking, DES appears to have the highest risk of acute thrombosis and DCB appears to have the lowest risk.

Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Long-Segment Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: Pooled Analysis from the BIOLUX P-III SPAIN and BIOLUX P-III All-Comers Registry Long Lesion Subgroup

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical performance and safety of the Passeo-18 Lux drug-coated balloon (DCB) in complex femoropopliteal Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C and D lesions in an all-comers patient population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data from BIOLUX P-III SPAIN, a prospective, national, multicenter, postmarket all-comers registry conducted from 2017 to 2019, and a matching long lesion subgroup from the BIOLUX P-III All-Comers global registry conducted from 2014 to 2018 were pooled for analysis. The primary safety end point was freedom from major adverse events (MAEs) at 6 months, and the primary performance end point was freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (fCD-TLR) at 12 months, both adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients, of whom 32.7% had critical limb ischemia, were included in the Passeo-18 Lux long lesion cohort. The mean lesion length was 248.5 mm ± 71.6, and the majority were occluded (54.1%), calcified (87.4%), and of type TASC C (49.1%) or TASC D (50.9%). Freedom from MAEs was 90.6% (95% CI, 84.6-94.3) at 6 months and 83.9% (95% CI, 76.7-89.0) at 12 months. fCD-TLR was 84.4% (95% CI, 77.3-89.5) at 12 months. Freedom from target limb major amputation was 98.6% (95% CI, 94.6-99.7), and all-cause mortality was 5.3% (95% CI, 2.7-10.4) at 12 months. There were no device- or procedure-related deaths or amputations up to the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Passeo-18 Lux DCB is safe and effective for the treatment of long femoropopliteal lesions in a real-word setting.

High-Risk Characteristics for Clinical Failure after Isolated Femoropopliteal Peripheral Vascular Interventions

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggesting increased late mortality with paclitaxel-coated devices (PCDs) in femoropopliteal peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) prompted the US Food and Drug Administration to recommend limiting the use of PCDs to "patients at particularly high risk for restenosis". This study's aim is to characterize patients at high risk for restenosis and develop a risk score to guide clinicians in selecting patients for treatment with PCDs.

METHODS

Patients who underwent isolated femoropopliteal PVI for claudication or rest pain from 2016-2019 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Patients who received intervention with a PCD, hybrid procedures, died within 1 year, or had missing follow-up data were excluded. The primary end point was clinical failure at 1 year defined as > 50% restenosis, loss of patency, reintervention, or major amputation. Data were split randomly into 2/3 for development and 1/3 for validation. A parsimonious multivariable hierarchical logistic regression for clinical failure was developed and a risk score was created using beta-coefficients. The risk score was applied to the validation dataset and tested for goodness-of-fit and discrimination.

RESULTS

Among 4,856 treated patients, 718 (14.8%) experienced clinical failure within 1 year. Clinical failure was associated with age ≤ 50 years, female sex (48.1% vs. 39.5%), insulin-dependent diabetes (29.9% vs. 23.1%), creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL (9.9% vs. 5.7%), prior ipsilateral lower extremity revascularization (48.5% vs. 38.5%), prior ipsilateral minor amputation (5.3% vs. 1.7%), rest pain versus claudication (30.8% vs. 18.7%), occlusion length ≥ 20 cm (18.8% vs. 15.0%), and Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II Classification C or D (40.4% vs. 28.0%), all P ≤ 0.01. Risk score development was performed using a multivariable regression. The model demonstrated good fit and discrimination (C-statistic 0.71 in development and 0.72 in validation dataset). Predicted clinical failure was 8.9% for standard-risk (45.9% of interventions), 15.5% for high-risk (44.2% of interventions), and 33.8% for very high-risk patients (9.8% of interventions).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel risk score was created with good discrimination for identifying patients at high risk for clinical failure at 1 year after femoropopliteal PVI for claudication and rest pain. Patients at high risk and very high risk for clinical failure may benefit from alternative strategies including PCDs.

Simulation and Experimental Investigation of Balloon Folding and Inserting Performance for Angioplasty: A Comparison of Two Materials, Polyamide-12 and Pebax

BACKGROUND

A balloon dilatation catheter is a vital tool in percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Various factors, including the material used, influence the ability of different types of balloons to navigate through lesions during delivery.

OBJECTIVE

Thus far, numerical simulation studies comparing the impacts of different materials on the trackability of balloon catheters has been limited. This project seeks to unveil the underlying patterns more effectively by utilizing a highly realistic balloon-folding simulation method to compare the trackability of balloons made from different materials.

METHODS

Two materials, nylon-12 and Pebax, were examined for their insertion forces via a bench test and a numerical simulation. The simulation built a model identical to the bench test's groove and simulated the balloon's folding process prior to insertion to better replicate the experimental conditions.

RESULTS

In the bench test, nylon-12 demonstrated the highest insertion force, peaking at 0.866 N, significantly outstripping the 0.156 N force exhibited by the Pebax balloon. In the simulation, nylon-12 experienced a higher level of stress after folding, while Pebax had demonstrated a higher effective strain and surface energy density. In terms of insertion force, nylon-12 was higher than Pebax in specific areas.

CONCLUSION

nylon-12 exerts greater pressure on the vessel wall in curved pathways when compared to Pebax. The simulated insertion forces of nylon-12 align with the experimental results. However, when using the same friction coefficient, the difference in insertion forces between the two materials is minimal. The numerical simulation method used in this study can be used for relevant research. This method can assess the performance of balloons made from diverse materials navigating curved paths and can yield more precise and detailed data feedback compared to benchtop experiments.

Clinical investigation of the GORE Drug-Coated PTA Balloon Catheter for CE Mark Approval

OBJECTIVES

Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty has been established as the first-line therapy of femoropopliteal artery disease. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the performance and the safety of the GORE-DCB Catheter in the treatment of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions of patients with peripheral artery disease for CE-Mark approval.

METHODS

Prospective, single-arm, multicenter study with 24 months follow-up. The GORE-DCB Catheter consists of a drug-coated nylon (inner layer)/ePTFE (outer layer) composite balloon. The ePTFE layer is coated with paclitaxel (concentration: 3.5μg/mm²), and the excipients stearic acid/tromethamine (tris). The primary endpoints were 6-month late lumen loss (LLL) and 30-day of freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE).

RESULTS

Fifty-two subjects were enrolled, 69% men, median age 69 (49-83) years. Acute device success was 100%, the 30-day MAE rate was zero. Study primary endpoint of LLL (-0.17 mm) showed significant superiority compared to the performance goal of uncoated PTA balloon catheters from literature. At 1 and 2 years primary patency rates were 81.8% and 68.7%, respectively, and freedom from clinical driven target lesion revascularization rates were 87.9% and 83.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates that the treatment of lesions in femoropopliteal arteries with the GORE-DCB Catheter is safe and effective.

Drug-Coated Balloon versus Drug-Eluting Stent: The Debate of Leave Nothing Behind

Endovascular techniques for peripheral artery disease have changed significantly in the past 10 years with advances in technology and data. Treatment of superficial femoral disease is complex secondary to the length, degree of calcification, high rate of chronic total occlusion, and areas of flexion within this vessel. Use of drug-coated devices has increased the interventionalist's toolbox with the objective to improve freedom from target lesion revascularization and primary patency. There remains debate as to which devices may reach these goals while also limiting overall morbidity and mortality. This article aims to highlight recent advances in the literature regarding the use of drug-coated devices.

Endovascular revascularization strategies for aortoiliac and femoropopliteal artery disease: a meta-analysis

AIMS

Optimal endovascular management of intermittent claudication (IC) remains disputed. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares efficacy and safety outcomes for balloon angioplasty (BA), bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-coated balloons (DCB), drug-eluting stents (DES), covered stents, and atherectomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized, controlled trials (RCT) from inception through November 2021. Efficacy outcomes were primary patency, target-lesion revascularization (TLR), and quality-of-life (QoL). Safety endpoints were all-cause mortality and major amputation. Outcomes were evaluated at short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1-2 years), and long-term (≥2 years) follow-up. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021292639). Fifty-one RCTs enrolling 8430 patients/lesions were included. In femoropopliteal disease of low-to-intermediate complexity, DCBs were associated with higher likelihood of primary patency [short-term: odds ratio (OR) 3.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.44-4.24; long-term: OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.93-3.16], lower TLR (short-term: OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.49; long-term: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29-0.60) and similar all-cause mortality risk, compared with BA. Primary stenting using BMS was associated with improved short-to-mid-term patency and TLR, but similar long-term efficacy compared with provisional stenting. Mid-term patency (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.89-3.03) and TLR (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.22-1.11) estimates were comparable for DES vs. BMS. Atherectomy, used independently or adjunctively, was not associated with efficacy benefits compared with drug-coated and uncoated angioplasty, or stenting approaches. Paucity and heterogeneity of data precluded pooled analysis for aortoiliac disease and QoL endpoints.

CONCLUSION

Certain devices may provide benefits in femoropopliteal disease, but comparative data in aortoiliac arteries is lacking. Gaps in evidence quantity and quality impede identification of the optimal endovascular approach to IC.

The Ranger drug-coated balloon: advances in drug-coated technology for treatment of femoropopliteal segment arterial disease

Paclitaxel drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have been shown to improve patency and lower revascularization rates compared with plain old balloon angioplasty. DCBs continue to evolve by improving balloon-coating techniques that minimize the quantity of particles washed off into the bloodstream while maximizing drug retention and vascular-healing profile. Against this backdrop, it is clear that the future of antiproliferatives for the superficial femoral artery will focus on enhancements in device coating materials that will improve the efficiency of drug delivery. The Ranger DCB system recently gained US FDA approval for use. This review discusses the background of DCBs and how the Ranger DCB builds on these previous platforms based on experimental and clinical data.

Outcome after revascularization with paclitaxel-coated devices in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel (PTX)-coated peripheral arterial devices for femoropopliteal artery (FPA) atherosclerotic disease is derived from studies that mainly evaluated patients with claudication. Outcomes of PTX treatment for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is incompletely defined. This study compares outcome in patients with CLTI treated with and without PTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied patients who underwent FPA intervention for an indication of CLTI in the Vascular Quality Initiative peripheral vascular intervention database from 2016 to 2020. Patients who had concomitant iliac or tibial interventions were included. One limb per patient was studied. Propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, indication, and pharmacological therapy was performed to generate balanced cohorts. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression compared limb salvage, overall survival, primary patency, and major adverse limb events (MALE) between patients treated with and without PTX.

RESULTS

Demographics, comorbidities, indications, and procedural details were similar between 14,065 PTX and 14,065 non-PTX propensity-matched patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 18-month follow-up demonstrated that the PTX group compared with the non-PTX group had a significantly higher rates of limb salvage (89.2% vs 86.5%; P < .001), primary patency (80.3% vs 76.9%; P < .001), and freedom from MALE (72.6% vs 67.9%; P < .001). Multivariate analysis also showed that PTX treatment was associated with a lower risk of major amputation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-0.82; P < .001), loss of primary patency (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.87; P < .001), and MALE (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.82; P < .001). Overall, 21% of patients had a prior ipsilateral peripheral vascular intervention. Removing these patients from the analysis yielded similar results at 18 months. Overall survival at 54 months was not statistically different between the PTX and non-PTX groups in the overall cohort (73.5 vs 71.3%; P = .07), but significant in the de-novo treated patients (73.9% vs 70.7%; P = .02).Multivariate analyses showed a lower mortality risk in the PTX patients (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.98; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

FPA intervention with a PTX-coated device is associated with improved limb salvage, primary patency, and freedom from MALE at the 18-month follow-up compared with uncoated devices. This benefit was not associated with an increase in all-cause mortality out to 4.5 years. Further study is necessary to determine the optimal role for PTX in the treatment of the FPA for patients with CLTI and to understand its long-term outcome.

Results of New Dual-Drug Coated Balloon Angioplasty versus POBA for Femoropopliteal Lesions

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to assess the 24-month safety and effectiveness of a new generation drug-coated balloon (DCB) (Elutax; AR Baltic Medical, Vilnius Lithuania-also marketed as Emperor in some European countries; Aachen Resonance, Germany, and AB Medica, Italy) for the treatment of patients with femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

From January 2019 to January 2020, DCB angioplasties using Elutax were performed on 53 consecutive patients (53 limbs) with femoropopliteal lesions (group A) and compared with a noncontemporary control group (group B) consisting of 71 patients (71 limbs) treated with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) between January 2017 and January 2018. Before performing the angioplasty, both groups underwent clinical examination, ultrasound evaluation, and computed tomography angiography to delineate subject clinical and baseline lesion characteristics. Primary end point was primary patency rate at 24 months. Secondary end points included clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), overall survival and limb salvage rates.

RESULTS

In both groups technical success rate was 100% with bailout stenting performed in 16.9% (9/53) of lesions in group A, while stenting was necessary in 22.5% of lesions (16/71) in group B. Patients treated with Elutax exhibited lower 24-month restenosis/reocclusion rate and improved primary patency compared to those treated with POBA (restenosis/reocclusion rate: 9.4% vs. 25.3%, CI 95% 0.01-0.30, P = 0.034; primary patency: 88.2% vs. 71.5%, log rank P = 0.03). Twenty-four-month CD-TLR rate was 7.5% for DCB versus 18.3% for POBA. No device or procedure-related deaths occurred, and no 30-day mortality was observed in either group. During the follow-up period, the limb salvage rate was 94.9% for A group and 92.1% for B group. All minor amputations occurred in limbs presented with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Overall survival was 91.7% for group A and 89.4% for group B.

CONCLUSIONS

Paclitaxel + Dextran DCB angioplasty proved safe and effective in managing chronic lesions of femoropopliteal arteries. Our experience has shown superior primary patency rate for Elutax when compared to POBA.

Understudied factors in drug-coated balloon design and evaluation: A biophysical perspective

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) percutaneous interventional therapy allows for durable reopening of the narrowed lumen via physical tissue expansion and local anti-restenosis drug delivery, providing an alternative to traditional uncoated balloons or a permanent indwelling implant such as a conventional metallic drug-eluting stent. While DCB-based treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has been incorporated into clinical guidelines, DCB use has been recently curtailed due to reports that showed evidence of increased mortality risk in patients treated with paclitaxel (PTX)-coated balloons. Given the United States Food and Drug Administration's 2019 consequent warning regarding PTX-eluting DCBs and the subsequent marked reduction in clinical DCB use, there is now a critical need to better understand the compositional and mechanical factors underlying DCB efficacy and safety. Most work to date on DCB refinement has focused on designing both the enabling balloon catheter and alternate coatings composed of various drugs and excipients, followed by device evaluation in preclinical and clinical studies. We contend that improvement in DCB performance will require a better understanding of the biophysical factors operative during and following balloon deployment, and moreover that the elaboration and demonstrated control of these factors are needed to address current concerns with DCB use. This article provides a perspective on the biophysical interactions that govern DCB performance and offers new design strategies for the development of next-generation DCB devices.

Patient-level and external factors in the use of drug-coated balloons and drug-eluting stents in femoropopliteal endovascular interventions

OBJECTIVE

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) and drug-eluting stents (DES) have been rapidly adopted for femoropopliteal endovascular interventions due to their favorable patency rates. It is unclear whether choice of using drug coated devices versus bare metal stents (BMS) or plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) as primary treatment in femoropopliteal disease is mostly associated with patient-level factors, safety concerns, or by operator preferences. This study sought to evaluate factors associated with their use in a contemporary dataset.

METHODS

All femoropopliteal lesions treated with endovascular interventions between 2016 and 2019 from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry were included. For each procedure, a primary treatment was identified based on the following hierarchy: DES > DCB > BMS > POBA. A hierarchical logistic regression model predicting DCB or DES use included patient-level characteristics, key events (period after Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement change, January 2018 [vs before] and period after Katsanos meta-analysis December 2018 [vs before]), and random effects for site and operator. Operator-level variability for DCB and DES use was summarized with an adjusted median odds ratio (MOR).

RESULTS

A total of 57,753 femoropopliteal endovascular procedures were included. Poor functional status (odds ratio [OR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.94), prior anticoagulant use (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.97), higher Rutherford classification (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.84-0.88), chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.98), and the period after the Katsanos meta-analysis publication (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.29-0.32) were associated with a lower odds of DCB or DES use; whereas female sex (OR, 1.12; 95% CI,1.08-1.17), prior lesion treatment (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22), diabetes (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12), Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus class B (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.09-1.24) and C (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.12-1.28), and the period after the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement change (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14) were associated with a higher odds of DCB or DES use. Significant variability in use was found across operators (adjusted MOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.55-2.85) and centers (adjusted MOR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.50-3.27).

CONCLUSIONS

DCB or DES use in femoropopliteal disease demonstrates wide variability across operators and is linked strongly with external factors, followed by anatomic lesion characteristics and a history of previous interventions. Future work needs to focus on tailoring DCB or DES use to patient and lesion characteristics and to develop appropriate use guidelines integrating these factors.

Excimer laser atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans

INTRODUCTION

It has been reported that excimer laser atherectomy combined with a drug-coated balloon (ELA+DCB) can achieve better results than simple balloon angioplasty, especially for the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. However, reports on the application of ELA+DCB in China for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans are lacking. This study focuses on analysing the effectiveness and safety of ELA+DCB.

METHODS

This was a single-centre retrospective study that enrolled patients from November 2016 to January 2019 who had femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans treated by ELA+DCB. Preoperative demographics, operative details and postoperative follow-up outcomes were analysed statistically.

RESULTS

There were 43 patients with an average patient age of 68.0±8.6 years; 79.1% were male. In 30 cases, the lesions were de novo and the others were in-stent restenosis (ISR). During the procedure, flow-limiting dissection (48.8%) was the main adverse event and there were 17 bailout stent implantations due to dissection. Mean (±sd) ankle-brachial index (ABI) in the patients was 0.42±0.31 before the operation and 0.83±0.13 before discharge. The mean (±sd) follow-up time was 29.35±9.71 months. The primary patency rate was 66.8%, 64.3% and 60.9% at 12, 24 and 36 months. Freedom from target lesion revascularisation (TLR) was 85.7%, 80.7% and 75.3% at 12, 24 and 36 months. Rutherford categories also greatly improved during follow-up. Overall mortality was 6.9% (3/48), and no deaths were related to the intervention.

CONCLUSION

The use of ELA+DCB had good clinical benefit for femoropopliteal arteriosclerosis obliterans, which had good primary patency and freedom from TLR, although intraoperative complications still required attention. Multicentre randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed.

Comparison Between Clinical Outcomes of Low- and High-Dose Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon in Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesion

PURPOSE

There is a little datum about the impact of paclitaxel dosage in patients undergoing drug-coated balloons (DCB) in endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal lesions. In the current study, the authors sought to compare the clinical outcomes of low-dose (LD) and high-dose (HD) paclitaxel DCBs for patients undergoing EVT for femoropopliteal lesions in a real-world setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study population was derived from a multicenter registry named "Evaluation of clinical outcome after endovascular therapy for femoropopliteal artery disease in Kanagawa" (LANDMARK registry). This registry consists of patients from 5 hospitals in Kanagawa, Japan. Overall, 1,378 patients with 1,777 lesions received treatment between July 2017 and June 2020. Among these, DCB angioplasty was performed in 477 patients (516 lesions). Propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare the clinical outcomes of LD-DCB (Lutonix; Becton Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey) and HD-DCB (IN.PACT Admiral; Medtronic Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

RESULTS

A total of 160 matched pairs of lesions were analyzed. Primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization at 2 years were similar between the two groups (LD-DCB vs. HD-DCB: 72% vs. 70%, p = 0.53; and 75% vs. 73%, p = 0.59, respectively).

CONCLUSION

No significant differences were found in the clinical outcomes between LD-DCB and HD-DCB angioplasty for femoropopliteal lesions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Case report: Unusual persistent hypotension and acute occlusion after peripheral paclitaxel balloon angioplasty

Background

Paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) angioplasty is a mainstream treatment for peripheral artery disease; however, the safety of PCB remains controversial.

Case presentation

We confirmed acute occlusion during PCB angioplasty in a patient with femoropopliteal artery occlusion. The occluded vessels were revascularized completely after endovascular medical therapy and bailout stenting angioplasty. Then, the patient experienced persistent post-procedure orthostatic hypotension (30 days) and received hydration and vasoactive agents with a target mean arterial blood pressure of 75–85 mmHg. The patient's blood pressure gradually recovered over the 30 days after the procedure, and there was no recurrence of symptomatic hypotension during the follow-up.

Conclusions

This rare complication is helpful to evaluate the safety of the PCB device.

Safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Clinical benefit of paclitaxel-coated devices for patients with peripheral arterial disease has been confirmed in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis published in 2018 identified late mortality risk over a long follow-up period due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices in the femoropopliteal arteries, which caused enormous controversy and debates globally. This study aims to further evaluate the safety of paclitaxel-coated devices by incorporating the most recently published data.

Methods

We searched for candidate studies in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE (Ovid) online databases, government web archives and international cardiovascular conferences. Safety endpoints of interest included all-cause mortality rates at one, two and five years and the risk ratio (RR) was used as the summary measure. The primary analysis was performed using random-effects models to account for potential clinical heterogeneity.

Findings

Thirty-nine RCTs including 9164 patients were identified. At one year, the random-effects model yielded a pooled RR of 1.06 (95% CI [0.87, 1.29]) indicating no difference in short-term all-cause deaths between the paclitaxel and control groups (crude mortality, 4.3%, 214/5025 versus 4.5%, 177/3965). Two-year mortality was reported in 26 RCTs with 382 deaths out of 3788 patients (10.1%) in the paclitaxel arm and 299 out of 2955 patients (10.1%) in the control arm and no association was found between increased risk of death and usage of paclitaxel-coated devices (RR 1.08, 95% CI [0.93, 1.25]). Eight RCTs recorded all-cause deaths up to five years and a pooled RR of 1.18 (95% CI [0.92, 1.51]) demonstrated no late mortality risk due to use of paclitaxel-coated devices (crude mortality, paclitaxel 18.2%, 247/1360 versus control 15.2%, 122/805).

Conclusions

We found no significant difference in either short- or long-term all-cause mortalities between patients receiving paclitaxel-coated and uncoated devices. Further research on the longer-term safety of paclitaxel usage (e.g., 8- or 10-year) is warranted.

Registration

PROSPERO, CRD42021246291.

One-year outcomes following primary stenting of infrapopliteal steno-occlusive arterial disease using a non-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent: Results from a prospective single-centre cohort study

Background

Clinical outcomes using new generation drug-eluting stents designed specifically for infrapopliteal disease are not widely available, especially in comparison to paclitaxel-based therapies. This series reports 1-year outcomes in patients with diabetes and chronic limb threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing angioplasty, with a sirolimus-eluting tibial stent (Cre8, Alvimedica, Turkey), evaluating the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this new device. Outcomes were compared to matched patients undergoing infrapopliteal angioplasty using a paclitaxel-coated balloon (DCB).

Patients and Methods

Patients with diabetes and CLTI requiring infrapopliteal intervention were recruited prospectively to undergo angioplasty and primary stenting using the Cre8 sirolimus-eluting stent between January 2018 and October 2020 at a single high-volume vascular centre; outcomes were compared to a group of patients with diabetes and CLTI who had undergone infrapopliteal angioplasty using a DCB. All patients were followed up for at least 12 months using a uniform protocol with duplex ultrasound and examination. The primary outcome measure was target lesion patency (<50% restenosis). Clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), amputations, Rutherford stage, and mortality were also recorded.

Results

A total of 54 patients (61 target lesions; median age: 69 years, 74% male) were included [27 with the Cre8 device (main group) vs. 27 with a DCB (historical controls)]. Primary patency at 12 months was 81% in the Cre8 group vs. 71% in the control group (p = 0.498). Overall, four (15%) patients in the Cre8 group vs. three (11%) patients in the control group underwent a major amputation within 12 months (p = 1.0). CD-TLR (all endovascular) did not differ between groups at 12 months (4% Cre8 vs. 10% control group, p = 0.599). Rutherford stage improvement at 12 months was superior for the Cre8 group (52% vs. 15% improved by at least one stage, p = 0.039). One-year mortality was 15% in the Cre8 group vs. 22% in the control group, p = 0.726.

Conclusions

Primary stenting with the Cre8 stent is feasible and safe in diabetic patients and CLTI. When compared to patients undergoing angioplasty with a DCB, there were no significant differences regarding primary patency, CD-TLR, major amputations, and mortality at 12 months. Those treated with a Cre8 stent were more likely to have an improvement in their Rutherford stage.

Twelve-month safety and effectiveness of TCD-17187 drug-coated balloon for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery

PURPOSE

The aim of this preapproval trial was to evaluate the 12-month safety and effectiveness of the TCD-17187 drug-coated balloon (DCB) for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and/or proximal popliteal artery (PA).

METHODS

This was a prospective, multicenter, core laboratory adjudicated, single-arm trial. From October 2019 to November 2020, a total of 121 symptomatic peripheral artery disease patients with SFA and/or proximal PA lesions were enrolled. The primary effectiveness endpoint was 12-month primary patency defined as freedom from restenosis as determined by duplex ultrasonography in the absence of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR). The safety endpoint was the major adverse event (MAE) rate defined as freedom from a composite of device- and procedure-related death within 30 days, and index limb major amputation and/or CD-TLR through follow-up.

RESULTS

Average age was 74.5 ± 7.3 years and the frequency of diabetes mellitus was 67.5%. Average lesion length and vessel diameter were 106.0 ± 52.6 and 5.2 ± 0.8 mm, respectively. The frequency of chronic total occlusion and bilateral calcification was 17.5% and 50.8% of patients, respectively. The 12-month primary patency rate calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis was 81.1%, while 12-month freedom from CD-TLR was 95.8%. The MAE rate at 30 days was 1.7% and all events comprised CD-TLR. There were no instances of device- or procedure-related deaths, major amputations, or thrombosis throughout the 12-month evaluation period.

CONCLUSION

This preapproval trial confirmed the safety and effectiveness of TCD-17187 DCB in the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA and/or proximal PA.

Methodology of the BIOPACT RCT, a Multi-center, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Passeo-18 Lux Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB) of Biotronik Compared to the Medtronic IN.PACT Admiral DCB in the Treatment of Subjects with Lesions of the Femoropopliteal Artery

PURPOSE

Although effectiveness and safety of many different paclitaxel coated balloons in the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) are extensively studied, there is a lack of direct head-to-head comparison studies. To meet this need and to avoid potential "class-effects", the BIOPACT was set up. The purpose is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the Passeo-18 Lux DCB (Biotronik) for treatment of patients with symptomatic PAD due to femoropopliteal lesions.

METHODS

302 patients are randomized in a 1:1 manner to treatment with either the Passeo-18 Lux DCB or the IN.PACT Admiral DCB (Medtronic) for testing of a formal non-inferiority hypothesis. The participants will be followed for 5 years. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) at 12 months, defined as any re-intervention at the target lesion due to symptoms, drop of ankle brachial index (ABI) > 20% or > 0.15 compared to post-procedural ABI. Primary safety endpoint is a composite of freedom from device/procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure, freedom from major target limb amputation and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization (CD-TVR) through 12 months post-index procedure. Secondary endpoints can be found at clinicaltrials.gov, ID NCT03884257.

DISCUSSION

As full enrolment was reached by the beginning of September, the investigators expect complete analysis of the primary endpoints by the end of 2022; Meanwhile preliminary results will be disclosed during 2022. As in terms of randomized head-to-head efficacy and safety analysis, this study on paclitaxel coated balloons may provide additional information to clinicians and healthcare providers. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03884257 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2, Randomized trial.

State-of-the-Art Endovascular Therapies for the Femoropopliteal Segment: Are We There Yet?

Peripheral arterial disease is an increasingly prevalent condition with significant associated morbidity, mortality, and health care expenditure. Endovascular interventions are appropriate for most patients with either ongoing symptoms of intermittent claudication despite lifestyle and medical optimization or chronic limb-threatening ischemia. The femoropopliteal segment is the most common arterial culprit responsible for claudication and the most commonly revascularized segment. Endovascular approaches to revascularization of the femoropopliteal segment are advancing with an evolving landscape of techniques for arterial access, device-based therapies, vessel preparation, and intraprocedural imaging. These advances have been marked by debate and controversy, notably related to the safety of paclitaxel-based devices and necessity of atherectomy. In this review, we provide a critical overview of the current evidence, practice patterns, emerging evidence, and technological advances for endovascular intervention of the femoropopliteal arterial segment.

Excimer laser ablation combined with drug-coated balloon versus drug-coated balloon in the treatment of de novo atherosclerotic lesions in lower extremities (ELABORATE): study protocol for a real-world clinical trial

Background

The efficacy and validity of excimer laser ablation (ELA) in the in-stent restenosis (ISR) has been confirmed. However, its application in de novo atherosclerotic lesions of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) has not been clearly defined and its procedure has not been standardized.

Methods

ELABORATE is a prospective, multicenter, real-world study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety between ELA combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) and DCB alone in de novo atherosclerotic lesions of LEAD.

Discussion

ELABORATE is a prospective, multicenter, real-world study designed to assess the efficacy and safety between ELA combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) and DCB alone in patients with de novo atherosclerotic lesions of LEAD. According to the real-world situation, eligible patients will be allocated to ELA + DCB group (group E) and DCB group (group C). Baseline and follow-up information (at 3, 6, and 12 months) will be collected. The primary efficacy point is primary patency at 12-months, and the secondary efficacy points include clinically driven target lesion reintervention (CD-TLR), change of Rutherford class, ankle-brachial index and ulcer healing rate. These indexes will be assessed and recorded at 3, 6, and 12-month follow-up. Also, safety evaluation, including major adverse event, all-cause mortality through 30-day follow-up, unplanned major amputation, bailout stent and distal embolization, will also be evaluated by an independent core laboratory. All the data will be collected and recorded by the electric data capture system. This study will be finished in 3 years and the 12-month results will be available in 2023. All the patients will be followed for 5 years.

Trial registration number Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100051263). Registered 17 September 2019. http://www.chictr.org.cn/listbycreater.aspx.

Drug-coated balloons in below-the-knee arteries

Background: The search for an optimal interventional treatment strategy in infrapopliteal peripheral artery disease remains in the focus of interest. Whether drug-coated balloons (DCB) might enhance interventional outcomes after crural interventions is a matter of debate, as studies yielded conflicting results on DCB safety and efficacy. Patients and methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of 75 infrapopliteal DCB interventions performed at our institution in 68 patients with peripheral artery disease in Rutherford category 3 to 6. Results: Despite a high rate of long complex lesions and multi-vessel disease, freedom from clinically driven target lesions revascularization (TLR) after 365 days was 68%. After six months, healing or significant improvement of the ischemic ulcer was observed in 78% of cases. Accordingly, freedom from major amputation and death after 365 days was 82%. Freedom from major amputation and death was 76.2% of cases in patients with diabetes mellitus as opposed to 91.5% in patients without diabetes mellitus (p=0.049). Conclusions: With this real-world analysis we would like to contribute to the ongoing discussion on the benefit and safety of DCB treatment in below-the-knee interventions.

Changes in national endovascular management of femoropopliteal artery disease: an analysis of the 2011-2019 Medicare data

PURPOSE

Current evidence supports endovascular approaches (including balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, and stenting) for management of femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD); this study sought to describe national trends in utilization of each intervention.

METHODS

The Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary dataset containing 100% of part B claims were interrogated for years 2011-2019. Current procedural terminology codes specific for femoropopliteal angioplasty, stenting, and atherectomy were used to create summary statistics for utilization by year, place of service (hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, and office-based lab), and provider specialty (cardiology, radiology, and surgery).

RESULTS

Atherectomy use increased from 34,732 procedures (33%) in 2011 to 75,435 (53%) in 2019 and became the dominant treatment strategy for femoropopliteal PAD. Relative utilization of stenting (36,793/35% to 28,899/20%) and angioplasty only (34,398/32% to 38,228/27%) decreased concomitantly from 2011 to 2019. Atherectomy use by 2019 was two-fold higher in office-based labs compared with the outpatient hospital setting (44,767 and 20,901, respectively). Treatment strategy varied by provider specialty in 2011 when cardiologists used atherectomy most frequently (17,925/43%), while radiologists used angioplasty alone (5,928/6%) and surgeons stented (18,009/37%) most frequently. By 2019 all specialties utilized atherectomy most frequently (29,564/59% for cardiology, 10,912/58% for radiology, and 33,649/47% for surgery).

CONCLUSION

National approach to endovascular management of femoropopliteal PAD has changed since 2011, towards an implant-free strategy including a multi-fold increase in atherectomy use. Discordant rates of atherectomy between the ambulatory hospital and office-based settings highlight the need for comparative effectiveness studies to guide management.

The Use of Paclitaxel-Coated Devices in the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Is Not Associated with Increased Mortality or Amputations

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Strategies for the most effective treatment for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) remain controversial among clinicians. Several trials have shown improved primary patency of femoropopliteal interventions with the utilization of paclitaxel-coated balloons or stents (DCBS) compared to conventional balloons or stents. However, a 2018 meta-analysis suggested an increased mortality risk for patients receiving DCBS, resulting in an international pause in the use of DCBS. A 2021 meta-analysis by the same group suggested an increased risk of major amputation following DCBS use in peripheral arterial revascularization procedures. Here we report our long-term institutional outcomes comparing uncoated devices to DCBS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent peripheral arterial angioplasty, stenting, atherectomy, or a combination between 2011 and 2020 within a regional healthcare system was performed. Univariate, multivariate and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods to assess the primary endpoints of overall survival, 5-year survival, and amputation-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 2717 patients were identified, of whom 1965 were treated with conventional uncoated devices and 752 were treated with DCBS. Univariate analysis showed that patients treated with non-DCBS had higher rates of overall mortality, major amputations, as well as mortality at 1, 3 and 5 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that use of conventional devices, age, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, MI, TIA, warfarin use and atrial fibrillation all significantly increased the risk of 5-year mortality, overall mortality, and combined mortality and/or amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

DCBS are not associated with increased mortality or worse amputation-free survival in this real-world cohort of patients treated for PAD. Our data suggest that mortality is more closely linked with pre-existing patient comorbidities rather than device selection at the time of revascularization.

Major adverse limb events in patients with femoro-popliteal and below-the-knee peripheral arterial disease treated with either sirolimus-coated balloon or standard uncoated balloon angioplasty: a structured protocol summary of the "SirPAD" randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease is a progressive atherosclerotic disease with symptoms ranging from an intermittent claudication to acute critical limb ischemia and amputations. Drug-coated balloons and stents were developed to prevent neo-intimal proliferation and restenosis after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Randomized controlled trials showed that drug-coated, notably paclitaxel-coated, devices reduce restenosis, late lumen loss, and the need for target lesion re-vascularization compared with uncoated ones. However, the size of these trials was too small to prove superiority for "hard" clinical outcomes. Moreover, available studies were characterized by too restrictive eligibility criteria. Finally, it remains unclear whether paclitaxel-coated balloons may impair long-term survival. Alternative drug-coated balloons, the so-called limus-based analogs, have been approved for clinical use in patients with peripheral arterial disease. By encapsulating sirolimus in phospholipid drug nanocarriers, they optimize adhesion properties of sirolimus and provide better bioavailability.

METHODS

In this investigator-initiated all-comer open-label phase III randomized controlled trial, we will evaluate whether sirolimus-coated balloon angioplasty is non-inferior and eventually superior, according to a predefined hierarchical analysis, to uncoated balloon angioplasty in adults with infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease requiring endovascular angioplasty. Key exclusion criteria are pregnancy or breastfeeding, known intolerance or allergy to sirolimus, and participation in a clinical trial during the previous 3 months. The primary efficacy outcome is the composite of two clinically relevant non-subjective "hard" outcomes: unplanned major amputation of the target limb and endovascular or surgical target lesion re-vascularization for critical limb ischemia occurring within 1 year of randomization. The primary safety outcome includes death from all causes.

DISCUSSION

By focusing on clinically relevant outcomes, this study will provide useful information on the efficacy and safety of sirolimus-coated balloon catheters for infra-inguinal peripheral arterial disease in a representative ("all-comer") population of unselected patients. As regulatory agencies had raised safety concerns in patients exposed to paclitaxel-coated devices (versus uncoated ones), collect mortality data up to 5 years after randomization will be collected.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04238546.

Network Analysis of Endovascular Treatment Strategies for Femoropopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease

PURPOSE

Endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal arterial diseases remains controversial. We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials aiming to investigate the efficacy differences between paclitaxel- or sirolimus-eluting stents, covered stents, drug-coated balloons, bare metal stents, and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

METHOD

MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid, and other relevant online material were searched up to October 21, 2020. Primary endpoints were primary patency and target lesion revascularization at 6, 12, and more than 24 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight eligible trials included 6026 patients. In terms of primary patency, drug eluting stents were ranked as the most effective treatment based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values at 6 (80.6), 12 (78.4), and more than 24 months (96.5) of follow-ups. In terms of target lesion revascularization, drug eluting stents were ranked as the most effective treatment based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve values at 6 (90.3), 12 (71.3), and more than 24 months (82.1) of follow-ups. Covered stents and bare metal stents had higher ranks in target lesion revascularization than those in primary patency. Sirolimus stents had a higher rank than paclitaxel stents.

CONCLUSION

Drug eluting stents showed encouraging results in primary patency rates and freedom from target lesion revascularization at all phases of follow-up for femoropopliteal arterial diseases. Sirolimus stents appear to be more effective in femoropopliteal segment than paclitaxel stent.

Recent advance in treatment of atherosclerosis: Key targets and plaque-positioned delivery strategies

Atherosclerosis, a chronic inflammatory disease of vascular wall, is a progressive pathophysiological process with lipids oxidation/depositing initiation and innate/adaptive immune responses. The coordination of multi systems covering oxidative stress, dysfunctional endothelium, diseased lipid uptake, cell apoptosis, thrombotic and pro-inflammatory responding as well as switched SMCs contributes to plaque growth. In this circumstance, inevitably, targeting these processes is considered to be effective for treating atherosclerosis. Arriving, retention and working of payload candidates mediated by targets in lesion direct ultimate therapeutic outcomes. Accumulating a series of scientific studies and clinical practice in the past decades, lesion homing delivery strategies including stent/balloon/nanoparticle-based transportation worked as the potent promotor to ensure a therapeutic effect. The objective of this review is to achieve a very brief summary about the effective therapeutic methods cooperating specifical targets and positioning-delivery strategies in atherosclerosis for better outcomes.