1
|
Sheng W, Dai H, Zheng R, Aihemaiti A, Liu X. An Updated Comprehensive Review of Existing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Access. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 2024:10.1007/s12265-024-10484-z. [PMID: 39186224 DOI: 10.1007/s12265-024-10484-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024]
Abstract
For the past 20 years, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been the treatment of choice for symptomatic aortic stenosis. The transfemoral (TF) access is considered the gold standard approach for TAVR. However, TF-TAVR cannot be performed in some patients; thus, alternative accesses are required. Our review paper generalises the TAVR accesses currently available, including the transapical, transaortic, trans-subclavian/axillary, transcarotid, transcaval, and suprasternal approaches. Their advantages and disadvantages have been analysed. Since there is no standard recommendation for an alternative approach, access selection depends on the expertise of the local cardiac team, patient characteristics, and access properties. Each TAVR centre is recommended to master a minimum of one non-TF access alternative. Of note, more evidence is required to delve into the clinical outcomes of each approach, at both early and long-term (Figure 1).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjing Sheng
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310009
- Internal Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310058
| | - Hanyi Dai
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310009
- Internal Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310058
| | - Rongrong Zheng
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310009
- Internal Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310058
| | - Ailifeire Aihemaiti
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310009
- Internal Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310058
| | - Xianbao Liu
- Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310009.
- Internal Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China, 310058.
- Binjiang Institute of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zahr F, Ramlawi B, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Song HK, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti SJ, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Leung S, Merhi W, Rovin JD, DeFrain M, Muppala M, Kauten J, Rajagopal V, Huang J, Ito S, Forrest JK. 3-Year Outcomes From the Evolut Low Risk TAVR Bicuspid Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:1667-1675. [PMID: 39048253 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes from transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low-surgical risk patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis beyond 2 years are limited. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate 3-year clinical and echocardiographic outcomes from the Evolut Low Risk Bicuspid Study. METHODS The Evolut Low Risk Bicuspid Study is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study conducted in 25 U.S. CENTERS Patients with severe aortic stenosis at low surgical risk with bicuspid aortic valve anatomy (all subtypes) underwent TAVR with a self-expanding, supra-annular Evolut R or PRO (Medtronic) bioprosthesis. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated all deaths and endpoint-related adverse events, and a central echocardiographic core laboratory assessed hemodynamic endpoints. RESULTS An attempted implant was performed in 150 patients from December 2018 to October 2019. The mean age was 70.3 ± 5.5 years, 48% (72/150) of the patients were women, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 1.3% (Q1-Q3: 0.9%-1.7%). Sievers type 1 was the dominant bicuspid morphology (90.7%, 136/150). The Kaplan-Meier rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke were 1.3% (95% CI: 0.3%-5.3%) at 1 year, 3.4% (95% CI: 1.4%-8.1%) at 2 years, and 4.1% (95% CI: 1.6%-10.7%) at 3 years. The incidence of new permanent pacemaker implantation was 19.4% (95% CI: 12.4%-29.6%) at 3 years. There were no instances of moderate or severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation at 2 and 3 years after TAVR. CONCLUSIONS The 3-year results from the Evolut Low Risk Bicuspid Study demonstrate low rates of all-cause mortality or disabling stroke and favorable hemodynamic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firas Zahr
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
| | - Basel Ramlawi
- Lankenau Heart Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - G Michael Deeb
- University of Michigan Health Systems, University Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Howard K Song
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Neal S Kleiman
- Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stanley J Chetcuti
- University of Michigan Health Systems, University Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Hemal Gada
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - William Merhi
- Corewell Health Hospitals, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Saki Ito
- Echocardiography Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John K Forrest
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kherallah RY, Suffredini JM, Rahman F, Eng MH, Kleiman N, Manandhar P, Kosinski A, Silva G, Kamat I, Kapadia S, Vemulapalli S, Jneid H. Impact of Elevated Gradients After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation for Degenerated Surgical Aortic Valve Bioprostheses. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2024; 17:e013558. [PMID: 38785079 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated aortic valve gradients are common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation for degenerated surgical aortic valve replacement bioprostheses, but their clinical impact is uncertain. METHODS A total of 12 122 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation-in-surgical aortic valve replacement from November 2011 to December 2019 in the Society of Thoracic Surgery/American College of Cardiology Transvalvular Therapeutics Registry were included. The primary outcome was a composite of 1-year all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or valve reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 1-year all-cause mortality, readmission, and change from baseline 12-question self-administered Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary Score. Due to nonlinearity observed with restricted cubic splines analysis, a Cox regression analysis with aortic valve mean gradient modeled as a spline-continuous variable (with 20 mm Hg as a cutoff) was used to study the 1-year composite outcome and mortality. RESULTS The composite outcome occurred most frequently in patients with aortic valve mean gradient ≥30 and <10 mm Hg, as compared with those with 10 to 20 and 20 to 30 mm Hg ranges (unadjusted rates, 13.9%, 12.1%, 7.5%, and 6.5%, respectively; P=0.002). When the mean aortic valve gradient was ≥20 mm Hg, higher gradients were associated with greater risk of the 1-year composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 [1.02-1.03] per mm Hg; P<0.001) and 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 [1.00-1.03] per mm Hg; P=0.007). Whereas when the mean aortic valve gradient was <20 mm Hg, higher gradients were not significantly associated with the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99 [0.98-1.003] per mm Hg; P=0.12) but were associated with lower 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.98 [0.97-0.99] per mm Hg; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS The relationship between postprocedural aortic valve mean gradient after transcatheter aortic valve implantation-in-surgical aortic valve replacement and clinical outcomes is complex and nonlinear, with relatively greater adverse events occurring at low and high gradient extremes. Further study of factors mediating the relationship between postprocedural gradients and clinical outcomes, including low-flow states, is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riyad Yazan Kherallah
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.Y.K., J.M.S., G.S.)
| | - John M Suffredini
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.Y.K., J.M.S., G.S.)
| | - Faisal Rahman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD (F.R.)
| | - Marvin H Eng
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Arizona Banner University Heart Institute, Phoenix (M.H.E.)
| | - Neal Kleiman
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist Hospital, TX (N.K.)
| | | | | | - Guilherme Silva
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX (R.Y.K., J.M.S., G.S.)
| | - Ishan Kamat
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco (I.K.)
| | - Samir Kapadia
- Department of Internal Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, OH (S.K.)
| | - Sreekanth Vemulapalli
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (P.M., A.K., S.V.)
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Duke Department of Medicine, Durham, NC (S.V.)
| | - Hani Jneid
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston (H.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fang W, Yuan X, Hu J, Ma W, Ren H, Wang Y, Zhou H, Li Y. Visualization of transcatheter aortic valve implantation from the perspective of bibliometric analysis. Heliyon 2024; 10:e33061. [PMID: 38988542 PMCID: PMC11234103 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was originally devised as a treatment for patients with aortic stenosis (AS). It has since emerged as a beneficial alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), extending its reach to a broader array of patients. Our objective was to illustrate the developmental trends and focus areas in TAVI research. We sourced a total of 11,480 research papers on TAVI, published between 1994 and 2022, from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. We conducted a bibliometric analysis of these publications, generating cooperation maps, performing co-citation analysis of journals and references, and carrying out a cluster analysis of keywords. Our findings indicate that TAVI research grapples with numerous clinical challenges. We created knowledge maps that highlight contributing countries/institutions, authors, journals with high publication and citation rates, and notable references in this domain. North America and Europe have been at the forefront of research within the TAVI field. The institutions and authors from these regions exert significant influence in this area of study. Beginning in 2009, China has progressively expanded its research on TAVI over the past two decades. We anticipate that future research will increasingly focus on three key areas: implementation scope, lifelong management, outcomes and predicting the risk of TAVI. Research on TAVI is flourishing. Cooperation among different countries and institutions in this field must be strengthened in the future, especially for developing counties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Fang
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Xiaojie Yuan
- Department of Epidemiology, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Hazard Assessment and Control in Special Operational Environment, School of Public Health, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Jianqiang Hu
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Wenshuai Ma
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - He Ren
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Yuemei Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Ministry of Education Key Lab of Hazard Assessment and Control in Special Operational Environment, School of Public Health, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Haijia Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Cardiology, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, 710000, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Imamura Y, Kowatari R, Koizumi J, Tabayashi A, Saitoh D, Kin H. Twenty-year experience following aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age. J Cardiothorac Surg 2024; 19:279. [PMID: 38715032 PMCID: PMC11075206 DOI: 10.1186/s13019-024-02776-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Reports on long-term outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients aged < 60 years are scarce in Japan. Hence, we aimed to evaluate these outcomes in patients aged < 60 years. METHODS Between March 2000 and December 2020, 1477 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. In total, 170 patients aged < 60 years who underwent aortic valve replacement were recruited. Patients aged < 18 years were excluded. Patient data collected from the operative records and follow-up assessments were reviewed. RESULTS The mean age was 49 ± 9 years, and 64.1% of patients were male. One-hundred-and-fifty-two patients (89.4%) underwent aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve and 18 (10.6%) with a bioprosthetic valve. The mean follow-up period was 8.1 ± 5.5 years. No operative mortality occurred, and in-hospital mortality occurred in one patient (0.6%). Ten late deaths occurred, with seven cardiac-related deaths. The overall survival rate was 95.4 ± 1.7%, 93.9 ± 2.3%, 90.6 ± 3.9%, and 73.2 ± 11.8% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from major bleeding was 96.4 ± 1.6% at 5, 10, and 15 years, and 89.0 ± 7.3% at 20 years. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 98.7 ± 1.3%, 97.3 ± 1.9%, 90.5 ± 4.5%, and 79.0 ± 11.3% at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years, respectively. Freedom from valve-related reoperation was 99.4 ± 0.6% at 5 years, 97.8 ± 1.7% at 10 and 15 years, and 63.9 ± 14.5% at 20 years. CONCLUSIONS Patients aged < 60 years undergoing aortic valve replacement with a high mechanical valve implantation rate had favorable long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Imamura
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kowatari
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan.
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Japan.
| | - Junichi Koizumi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Azuma Tabayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Daiki Saitoh
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan
| | - Hajime Kin
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Iwate Medical University, 2-1-1 Idaidori, Yahaba-cho, Shiwa-gun, Iwate, Yahaba, 028-3695, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Praz F, Beyersdorf F, Haugaa K, Prendergast B. Valvular heart disease: from mechanisms to management. Lancet 2024; 403:1576-1589. [PMID: 38554728 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02755-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
Valvular heart disease is common and its prevalence is rapidly increasing worldwide. Effective medical therapies are insufficient and treatment was historically limited to the surgical techniques of valve repair or replacement, resulting in systematic underprovision of care to older patients and those with substantial comorbidities, frailty, or left ventricular dysfunction. Advances in imaging and surgical techniques over the past 20 years have transformed the management of valvular heart disease. Better understanding of the mechanisms and causes of disease and an increasingly extensive and robust evidence base provide a platform for the delivery of individualised treatment by multidisciplinary heart teams working within networks of diagnostic facilities and specialist heart valve centres. In this Series paper, we aim to provide an overview of the current and future management of valvular heart disease and propose treatment approaches based on an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology and the application of multidisciplinary treatment strategies to individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Praz
- University Hospital Bern Inselspital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Friedhelm Beyersdorf
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Haugaa
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bernard Prendergast
- Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK; Department of Cardiology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Thyregod HGH, Jørgensen TH, Ihlemann N, Steinbrüchel DA, Nissen H, Kjeldsen BJ, Petursson P, De Backer O, Olsen PS, Søndergaard L. Transcatheter or surgical aortic valve implantation: 10-year outcomes of the NOTION trial. Eur Heart J 2024; 45:1116-1124. [PMID: 38321820 PMCID: PMC10984572 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a viable treatment option for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis across a broad range of surgical risk. The Nordic Aortic Valve Intervention (NOTION) trial was the first to randomize patients at lower surgical risk to TAVI or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The aim of the present study was to report clinical and bioprosthesis outcomes after 10 years. METHODS The NOTION trial randomized 280 patients to TAVI with the self-expanding CoreValve (Medtronic Inc.) bioprosthesis (n = 145) or SAVR with a bioprosthesis (n = 135). The primary composite outcome was the risk of all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) was classified as structural valve deterioration (SVD), non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD), clinical valve thrombosis, or endocarditis according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 criteria. Severe SVD was defined as (i) a transprosthetic gradient of 30 mmHg or more and an increase in transprosthetic gradient of 20 mmHg or more or (ii) severe new intraprosthetic regurgitation. Bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) was defined as the composite rate of death from a valve-related cause or an unexplained death following the diagnosis of BVD, aortic valve re-intervention, or severe SVD. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between TAVI and SAVR: age 79.2 ± 4.9 years and 79.0 ± 4.7 years (P = .7), male 52.6% and 53.8% (P = .8), and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score < 4% of 83.4% and 80.0% (P = .5), respectively. After 10 years, the risk of the composite outcome all-cause mortality, stroke, or myocardial infarction was 65.5% after TAVI and 65.5% after SAVR [hazard ratio (HR) 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-1.3; P = .9], with no difference for each individual outcome. Severe SVD had occurred in 1.5% and 10.0% (HR 0.2; 95% CI 0.04-0.7; P = .02) after TAVI and SAVR, respectively. The cumulative incidence for severe NSVD was 20.5% and 43.0% (P < .001) and for endocarditis 7.2% and 7.4% (P = 1.0) after TAVI and SAVR, respectively. No patients had clinical valve thrombosis. Bioprosthetic valve failure occurred in 9.7% of TAVI and 13.8% of SAVR patients (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.4-1.5; P = .4). CONCLUSIONS In patients with severe AS and lower surgical risk randomized to TAVI or SAVR, the risk of major clinical outcomes was not different 10 years after treatment. The risk of severe bioprosthesis SVD was lower after TAVR compared with SAVR, while the risk of BVF was similar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Gustav Hørsted Thyregod
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolaj Ihlemann
- Department of Cardiology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, 2400 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Daniel Andreas Steinbrüchel
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Henrik Nissen
- Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Bo Juel Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 4, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Petur Petursson
- Department of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Blå Stråket 5, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ole De Backer
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Skov Olsen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Søndergaard
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Khokhar AA, Curio J, Sticchi A, Hartley A, Demir OM, Ruparelia N. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation to Treat Degenerated Aortic, Mitral and Tricuspid Bioprosthesis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:592. [PMID: 38276098 PMCID: PMC10816283 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is now well established as the treatment of choice for patients with native aortic valve stenosis who are high or intermediate risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. Recent data has also supported the use of TAVI in patients at low surgical risk and also in anatomical subsets that were previously felt to be contra-indicated including bicuspid aortic valves and aortic regurgitation. With advancements and refinements in procedural techniques, the application of this technology has now been further expanded to include the management of degenerated bioprosthesis. After the demonstration of feasibility and safety in the management of degenerated aortic bioprosthetic valves, mitral and tricuspid bioprosthetic valve treatment is now also well-established and provides an attractive alternative to performing redo surgery. In this review, we appraise the latest clinical evidence and highlight procedural considerations when utilising TAVI technology in the management of degenerated aortic, mitral or tricuspid prosthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif A. Khokhar
- Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (A.A.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Jonathan Curio
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Alessandro Sticchi
- Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory, Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56126 Pisa, Italy;
- Università di Pisa, Lungarno Pacinotti 43, 56126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Adam Hartley
- Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (A.A.K.); (A.H.)
| | - Ozan M. Demir
- Department of Cardiology, Essex Cardiothoracic Centre, Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon SS16 5NL, UK
| | - Neil Ruparelia
- Cardiology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W12 0HS, UK; (A.A.K.); (A.H.)
- Cardiology, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading RG1 5AN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Geuens L, Van Hoof L, Van De Bruaene A, Rega F, Meuris B, Verbrugghe P. Aortic valve replacement in non-elderly: the gap between reality, guidelines and evidence. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2023; 64:ezad318. [PMID: 37756688 DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There are several treatment options for non-elderly adults (18-60 years) in need of aortic valve replacement (AVR): a mechanical or biological substitute, a homograft, the Ross procedure or nowadays even transcatheter aortic valve replacement. This study evaluated the current opinions and practices of cardiac surgeons and cardiologists concerning AVR strategies in this patient group. METHODS A 43-item online survey was sent out to several scientific organizations, individual cardiac surgeons, cardiologists and residents/fellows worldwide. RESULTS Two hundred twenty-two physicians from 33 different countries answered the survey. The UK (24%), Belgium (23%) and North America (22%) are best represented. A mechanical valve is the most frequently used substitute in non-elderly. With increasing patient age, the popularity of a biological valve increases. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement and the Ross procedure are each used in <10% of this cohort. Only 12% of the cardiac surgeons has experience with the Ross surgery. In 23%, the patient seems not to be involved in the decision on the type of valve substitute. CONCLUSIONS The preferred surgical treatment for non-elderly patients in need of AVR differs widely. To enable a shared decision-making process including patient preferences, there is more need for collaboration between cardiac departments, as well as education and scientific research about patient-centred outcomes of the different AVR techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Geuens
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lucas Van Hoof
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Filip Rega
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Meuris
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Verbrugghe
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tang GH, Spencer J, Rogers T, Grubb KJ, Gleason P, Gada H, Mahoney P, Dauerman HL, Forrest JK, Reardon MJ, Blanke P, Leipsic JA, Abdel-Wahab M, Attizzani GF, Puri R, Caskey M, Chung CJ, Chen YH, Dudek D, Allen KB, Chhatriwalla AK, Htun WW, Blackman DJ, Tarantini G, Zhingre Sanchez J, Schwartz G, Popma JJ, Sathananthan J. Feasibility of Coronary Access Following Redo-TAVR for Evolut Failure: A Computed Tomography Simulation Study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:e013238. [PMID: 37988439 PMCID: PMC10653288 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary accessibility following redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (redo-TAVR) is increasingly important, particularly in younger low-risk patients. This study aimed to predict coronary accessibility after simulated Sapien-3 balloon-expandable valve implantation within an Evolut supra-annular, self-expanding valve using pre-TAVR computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS A total of 219 pre-TAVR CT scans from the Evolut Low-Risk CT substudy were analyzed. Virtual Evolut and Sapien-3 valves were sized using CT-based diameters. Two initial Evolut implant depths were analyzed, 3 and 5 mm. Coronary accessibility was evaluated for 2 Sapien-3 in Evolut implant positions: Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 4 and Evolut node 5. RESULTS With a 3-mm initial Evolut implant depth, suitable coronary access was predicted in 84% of patients with the Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 4, and in 31% of cases with the Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 5 (P<0.001). Coronary accessibility improved with a 5-mm Evolut implant depth: 97% at node 4 and 65% at node 5 (P<0.001). When comparing 3- to 5-mm Evolut implant depth, sinus sequestration was the lowest with Sapien-3 outflow at Evolut node 4 (13% versus 2%; P<0.001), and the highest at Evolut node 5 (61% versus 32%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Coronary accessibility after Sapien-3 in Evolut redo-TAVR relates to the initial Evolut implant depth, the Sapien-3 outflow position within the Evolut, and the native annular anatomy. This CT-based quantitative analysis may provide useful information to inform and refine individualized preprocedural CT planning of the initial TAVR and guide lifetime management for future coronary access after redo-TAVR. REGISTRATION URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02701283.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert H.L. Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York (G.H.L.T.)
| | - Julianne Spencer
- Structural Heart & Aortic, Medtronic, Mounds View, MN (J. Spencer, J.Z.S., G.S., J.J.P.)
| | - Toby Rogers
- Section of Interventional Cardiology, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC (T.R.)
| | - Kendra J. Grubb
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery (K.J.G.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Structural Heart and Valve Center (K.J.G., P.G.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Patrick Gleason
- Structural Heart and Valve Center (K.J.G., P.G.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Division of Cardiology (P.G.), Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Hemal Gada
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, PA (H.G.)
| | | | | | - John K. Forrest
- Division of Cardiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT (J.K.F.)
| | | | - Philipp Blanke
- Center for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (P.B., J.A.L.)
| | - Jonathon A. Leipsic
- Center for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (P.B., J.A.L.)
| | | | - Guilherme F. Attizzani
- Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, OH (G.F.A.)
| | | | | | - Christine J. Chung
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle (C.J.C.)
| | - Ying-Hwa Chen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan (Y.-H.C.)
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland (D.D.)
| | - Keith B. Allen
- St. Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (K.B.A., A.K.C.)
| | | | | | - Daniel J. Blackman
- Department of Cardiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals, Leeds, United Kingdom (D.J.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Tarantini
- Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padua Medical School, Italy (G.T.)
| | - Jorge Zhingre Sanchez
- Structural Heart & Aortic, Medtronic, Mounds View, MN (J. Spencer, J.Z.S., G.S., J.J.P.)
| | - Greta Schwartz
- Structural Heart & Aortic, Medtronic, Mounds View, MN (J. Spencer, J.Z.S., G.S., J.J.P.)
| | - Jeffrey J. Popma
- Structural Heart & Aortic, Medtronic, Mounds View, MN (J. Spencer, J.Z.S., G.S., J.J.P.)
| | - Janarthanan Sathananthan
- Center for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada (J. Sathananthan)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Takahashi Y, Kamiya K, Nagai T, Tsuneta S, Oyama-Manabe N, Hamaya T, Kazui S, Yasui Y, Saiin K, Naito S, Mizuguchi Y, Takenaka S, Tada A, Ishizaka S, Kobayashi Y, Omote K, Sato T, Shingu Y, Kudo K, Wakasa S, Anzai T. Differences in blood flow dynamics between balloon- and self-expandable valves in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2023; 25:60. [PMID: 37880721 PMCID: PMC10601149 DOI: 10.1186/s12968-023-00970-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The differences in pre- and early post-procedural blood flow dynamics between the two major types of bioprosthetic valves, the balloon-expandable valve (BEV) and self-expandable valve (SEV), in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), have not been investigated. We aimed to investigate the differences in blood flow dynamics between the BEV and SEV using four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (4D flow CMR). METHODS We prospectively examined 98 consecutive patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR between May 2018 and November 2021 (58 BEV and 40 SEV) after excluding those without CMR because of a contraindication, inadequate imaging from the analyses, or patients' refusal. CMR was performed in all participants before (median interval, 22 [interquartile range (IQR) 4-39] days) and after (median interval, 6 [IQR 3-6] days) TAVR. We compared the changes in blood flow patterns, wall shear stress (WSS), and energy loss (EL) in the ascending aorta (AAo) between the BEV and SEV using 4D flow CMR. RESULTS The absolute reductions in helical flow and flow eccentricity were significantly higher in the SEV group compared in the BEV group after TAVR (BEV: - 0.22 ± 0.86 vs. SEV: - 0.85 ± 0.80, P < 0.001 and BEV: - 0.11 ± 0.79 vs. SEV: - 0.50 ± 0.88, P = 0.037, respectively); there were no significant differences in vortical flow between the groups. The absolute reduction of average WSS was significantly higher in the SEV group compared to the BEV group after TAVR (BEV: - 0.6 [- 2.1 to 0.5] Pa vs. SEV: - 1.8 [- 3.5 to - 0.8] Pa, P = 0.006). The systolic EL in the AAo significantly decreased after TAVR in both the groups, while the absolute reduction was comparable between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Helical flow, flow eccentricity, and average WSS in the AAo were significantly decreased after SEV implantation compared to BEV implantation, providing functional insights for valve selection in patients with AS undergoing TAVR. Our findings offer valuable insights into blood flow dynamics, aiding in the selection of valves for patients with AS undergoing TAVR. Further larger-scale studies are warranted to confirm the prognostic significance of hemodynamic changes in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuki Takahashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Kiwamu Kamiya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Nagai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.
| | - Satonori Tsuneta
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Noriko Oyama-Manabe
- Department of Radiology, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, 1-847 Amanuma-Cho, Omiya-Ku, Saitama-City, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan
| | - Takeshi Hamaya
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Sho Kazui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yutaro Yasui
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Kohei Saiin
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Naito
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Mizuguchi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Sakae Takenaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Atsushi Tada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Suguru Ishizaka
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yuta Kobayashi
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Kazunori Omote
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Takuma Sato
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Yasushige Shingu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Kohsuke Kudo
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan
| | - Satoru Wakasa
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| | - Toshihisa Anzai
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dobesh PP, Goldsweig AM. Antithrombotic therapy with Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Pharmacotherapy 2023; 43:1064-1083. [PMID: 37464970 DOI: 10.1002/phar.2847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Aortic valve replacement is a necessary management strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis. The use of transaortic valve replacement (TAVR) has increased significantly over the last decade and now exceeds traditional surgical aortic valve replacement. Since the valve systems used in TAVR consist of bioprosthetic valve tissue encased in a metal stent frame, antithrombotic therapy recommendations cannot be extrapolated from prior data with differently constructed surgical bioprosthetic or mechanical valves. Data on the use of antithrombotic therapy with TAVR are a rapidly developing area of medicine. Choice of agents depends on several patient factors. Patients undergoing TAVR also have a relatively high incidence of subclinical valve thrombosis. The clinical impact of this phenomenon and the implications for antithrombotic therapy continue to evolve. It is critical for clinicians who treat patients undergoing TAVR to have a firm understanding of practice guidelines, the evolving evidence, and its implications for the use of antithrombotic therapy in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul P Dobesh
- Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Andrew M Goldsweig
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardiovascular Clinical Research, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Watanabe T, Kitahara H, Shah AP, Blair J, Nathan S, Balkhy HH. Sternal-Sparing Surgical Options in Combined Aortic Valve and Coronary Artery Disease: Proof of Concept. INNOVATIONS-TECHNOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES IN CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2023; 18:346-351. [PMID: 37458227 DOI: 10.1177/15569845231185566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The standard management of concomitant aortic valve (AV) and coronary artery disease has been coronary artery bypass and AV replacement (AVR). With the advent of minimally invasive options, many isolated lesions have been successfully managed using a sternal-sparing approach. In our institution, patients with isolated AV disease are offered minimally invasive surgical or transcatheter AVR, and those with isolated coronary artery disease are routinely managed with robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention. Various combinations of these techniques can be used when a sternal-sparing posture is desired because of patient risk or preference. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes in patients with combined AV and coronary disease who were managed using sternal-sparing approaches. METHODS We reviewed the records of 10 patients in our minimally invasive surgical database who presented with concomitant AV and coronary artery disease and underwent combined sternal-sparing management of these 2 lesions using various combinations of minimally invasive approaches. RESULTS Four patients had totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass and minimally invasive AVR at the same time, 2 patients underwent transcatheter AVR followed by totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass, and 4 patients underwent minimally invasive AVR with percutaneous coronary intervention. There was no 30-day mortality. The duration of postoperative surgical hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.9 days. CONCLUSIONS Sternal-sparing approaches in combined AV and coronary artery disease are feasible with patient-specific treatment selection of minimally invasive techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatsuya Watanabe
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - Hiroto Kitahara
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - Atman P Shah
- Division of Cardiology University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - John Blair
- Division of Cardiology University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - Sandeep Nathan
- Division of Cardiology University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| | - Husam H Balkhy
- Section of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago Medicine, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Akodad M, Meier D, Sellers S, de Backer O, Mylotte D, Landes U, Frawley C, Lynch L, Tang GHL, Sondergaard L, Wood DA, Webb JG, Sathananthan J. A bench study of balloon-expandable valves for the treatment of self-expanding valve failure. EUROINTERVENTION 2023; 19:93-102. [PMID: 36621917 PMCID: PMC10174185 DOI: 10.4244/eij-d-22-00769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary obstruction and access are concerns in patients undergoing redo transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). AIMS We sought to assess the neoskirt height, leaflet overhang, leaflet deflection,and transcatheter heart valve (THV) expansion and performance, at 2 different implant depths, of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (S3U) within the ACURATE neo2 (ACn2) THV. METHODS An in vitro study was performed with a 23 mm S3U deployed within a small (S) ACn2 and a 26 mm S3U deployed within a medium (M) and a large (L) ACn2. The S3U outflow was positioned at the top of the ACn2 crown (low implant) and at the base of the commissural post of the ACn2 (high implant). Testing was performed under physiological conditions as per ISO-5840-3 standard. RESULTS The neoskirt height was shorter when the S3U outflow was positioned at a low implantation depth (S: 9.6 mm, M: 12.2 mm, L: 13.8 mm vs S: 15.2 mm, M: 15.1 mm, L: 17.8 mm ACn2 for high implants). Hydrodynamic performance was acceptable for all configurations. Leaflet overhang was <50% for all configurations except the low implant of the 26 mm S3U in the L ACn2 (77.6%). There was a gap from the side of the neoskirt to the outer border of the THV frame which was >2 mm for all configurations. The S3U was underexpanded for all configurations, and the achieved area was 77.9%-92.9% of the expected nominal area. CONCLUSIONS Redo TAVI with an S3U within an ACn2 has favourable hydrodynamics and moderate leaflet overhang. Importantly, the design of the ACn2 results in a neoskirt that is not deflected all the way to the outer dimensions of the THV, hence creating a space that facilitates coronary flow and access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariama Akodad
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Institut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud, Hôpital privé Jacques-Cartier, Ramsay Santé, Massy, France
| | - David Meier
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Stephanie Sellers
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ole de Backer
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Darren Mylotte
- Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway, (NUIG), Galway, Ireland
| | - Uri Landes
- Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel and Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Lisa Lynch
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lars Sondergaard
- Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - David A Wood
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - John G Webb
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Janarthanan Sathananthan
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang C, Xie Y, Zhang H, Yang P, Zhang Y, Lu C, Liu Y, Wang H, Xu Z, Hu J. Sutureless vs. rapid-deployment valve: a systemic review and meta-analysis for a direct comparison of intraoperative performance and clinical outcomes. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1123487. [PMID: 37255707 PMCID: PMC10225698 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Sutureless and rapid-deployment valves are bioprostheses anchoring within the aortic annulus with few sutures, and they act as a hybrid of conventional surgical and transcatheter valves under aortic valve replacement. Considering that the 3F Enable valve is now off-market, the only two sutureless and rapid-deployment valves available on the world marketplace are the Perceval and Intuity valves. However, a direct comparison of the function of these two valves eludes researchers. Purpose Against this background, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the intraoperative performance and early clinical outcomes between the Perceval valve and the Intuity valve under sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. Methods We systematically searched electronic databases through PubMed/MEDLINE, OvidWeb, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (from the establishment of the database to November 17, 2022, without language restriction) for studies comparing the sutureless valve (the Perceval) and the rapid-deployment valve (the Intuity) under aortic valve replacement. Our primary outcomes were early mortality and postoperative transvalvular pressure gradients. The secondary outcomes were defined to include aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass time, paravalvular leak (any paravalvular leak, moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak) after aortic valve replacement, need for pacemaker implantation, postoperative neurological events (stroke), and intensive care unit stay. Results This meta-analysis included ten non-randomized trials with 3,526 patients enrolled (sutureless group = 1,772 and rapid-deployment group = 1,754). Quality assessments were performed, with the mean scores of the studies reading 6.90 (SD = 0.99) out of 9 according to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Compared with rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement, sutureless aortic valve replacement was associated with higher mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients postoperatively. In contrast, aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary time were needed less in sutureless aortic valve replacement vs. rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. There was no evidence of significant publication bias observed by the funnel plot and Egger's test. Conclusions For postoperative hemodynamics, sutureless aortic valve replacement was associated with increased mean and peak transvalvular pressure gradients compared with rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement. In sharp contrast, sutureless aortic valve replacement significantly reduced the amount of time needed for fixing the aortic cross-clamp and the cardiopulmonary bypass procedure. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022343884.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenhao Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yi Xie
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongwei Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Peng Yang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chen Lu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Yu Liu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Haiyue Wang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Zhenyuan Xu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Jia Hu
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Cardiovascular Surgery Research Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Guang'an Hospital of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guang'an, Sichuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prandi FR, Niv Granot Y, Margonato D, Belli M, Illuminato F, Vinayak M, Barillà F, Romeo F, Tang GHL, Sharma S, Kini A, Lerakis S. Coronary Obstruction during Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Pre-Procedural Risk Evaluation, Intra-Procedural Monitoring, and Follow-Up. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:jcdd10050187. [PMID: 37233154 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10050187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is emerging as an effective treatment for patients with symptomatically failing bioprosthetic valves and a high prohibitive surgical risk; a longer life expectancy has led to a higher demand for these valve reinterventions due to the increased possibilities of outliving the bioprosthetic valve's durability. Coronary obstruction is the most feared complication of valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR; it is a rare but life-threatening complication and occurs most frequently at the left coronary artery ostium. Accurate pre-procedural planning, mainly based on cardiac computed tomography, is crucial to determining the feasibility of a ViV TAVR and to assessing the anticipated risk of a coronary obstruction and the eventual need for coronary protection measures. Intraprocedurally, the aortic root and a selective coronary angiography are useful for evaluating the anatomic relationship between the aortic valve and coronary ostia; transesophageal echocardiographic real-time monitoring of the coronary flow with a color Doppler and pulsed-wave Doppler is a valuable tool that allows for a determination of real-time coronary patency and the detection of asymptomatic coronary obstructions. Because of the risk of developing a delayed coronary obstruction, the close postprocedural monitoring of patients at a high risk of developing coronary obstructions is advisable. CT simulations of ViV TAVR, 3D printing models, and fusion imaging represent the future directions that may help provide a personalized lifetime strategy and tailored approach for each patient, potentially minimizing complications and improving outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Romana Prandi
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Yoav Niv Granot
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Davide Margonato
- Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Belli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
- Cardiovascular Imaging Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Illuminato
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Manish Vinayak
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Francesco Barillà
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Romeo
- Faculty of Medicine, Unicamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00131 Rome, Italy
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Samin Sharma
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Annapoorna Kini
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Stamatios Lerakis
- Division of Cardiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Matsushita K, Morel O, Ohlmann P. Contemporary issues and lifetime management in patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2023:10.1007/s12928-023-00924-z. [PMID: 36943655 DOI: 10.1007/s12928-023-00924-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
Latest clinical trials have indicated favorable outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in low surgical risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, there are unanswered questions particularly in younger patients with longer life expectancy. While current evidence are limited to short duration of clinical follow-up, there are certain factors which may impair patients clinical outcomes and quality-of-life at long-term. Contemporary issues in the current TAVR era include prosthesis-patient mismatch, heart failure hospitalization, subclinical thrombosis, future coronary access, and valve durability. In this review, the authors review available evidence and discuss each remaining issues and theoretical treatment strategies in lifetime management of TAVR patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensuke Matsushita
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France.
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine Régénérative, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
| | - Olivier Morel
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
- UMR1260 INSERM, Nanomédecine Régénérative, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Patrick Ohlmann
- Université de Strasbourg, Pôle d'Activité Médico-Chirurgicale Cardio-Vasculaire, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 1 Place de L'Hôpital, 67091, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Graversen PL, Butt JH, Østergaard L, Jensen AD, Warming PE, Strange JE, Møller CH, Schou M, De Backer O, Køber L, Fosbøl EL. Changes in aortic valve replacement procedures in Denmark from 2008 to 2020. Heart 2023; 109:557-563. [PMID: 36598047 DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2022-321594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since 2007, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has emerged as another treatment strategy for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). The objectives were to compare annual rates of aortic valve replacement (AVR) procedures performed in Denmark in the era of TAVI and to assess proportion of AVRs stratified by age with use of age recommendations presented in current guidelines. METHODS Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified first-time AVRs between 2008 and 2020. Patients who were not diagnosed with AS prior to AVR were excluded RESULTS: The rate of AVRs increased by 39% per million inhabitants from 2008 to 2020. TAVI has steadily increased since 2008, accounting for 64.2% of all AVRs and 72.5% of isolated AVRs by 2020. Number of isolated SAVRs decreased from 2014 and onwards. The proportion of TAVI increased significantly across age groups (<75 and ≥75 years of age, ptrend<0.001), and TAVI accounted for 91.5% of isolated AVR procedures in elderly patients (aged ≥75 years). Length of hospital stay were significantly reduced for all AVRs during the study period (ptrend all<0.001). CONCLUSIONS The number of AVRs increased from 2008 to 2020 due to adaptation of TAVI, which represented 2/3 of AVRs and more than 70% of isolated AVRs. In elderly patients, the increased use of AVR procedures was driven by TAVI, in agreement with the age recommendations in current guidelines; however, TAVI was used more frequently in patients aged <75 years, accompanied by a flattening use of SAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Laursen Graversen
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jawad Haider Butt
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lauge Østergaard
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Peder Emil Warming
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jarl Emanuel Strange
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian H Møller
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Morten Schou
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ole De Backer
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars Køber
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emil Loldrup Fosbøl
- Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Temporal changes of patient characteristics over 12 years in a single-center transcatheter aortic valve implantation cohort. Clin Res Cardiol 2023; 112:691-701. [PMID: 36792752 PMCID: PMC10160189 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-023-02166-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beneficial results of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients at all risk strata have led to substantial changes in guideline recommendations for valvular heart disease. AIM To examine influence of these guideline changes on a real-world TAVI cohort, we evaluated how risk profiles and outcomes of TAVI patients developed in our single-center patient cohort over a period of 12 years. METHODS Baseline, procedural and 30-day outcome parameters of TAVI patients were retrospectively compared between three time periods (period 1: 2008-2012, period 2: 2013-2017, period 3: 2018-2020). RESULTS Between 03/2008 and 12/2020, a total of 3678 patients underwent TAVI at our center. The median age was 81.1 years (25th, 75th percentile: 76.7, 84.9) with no significant change over time. The EuroSCORE II showed a continuous and significant decline from 5.3% (3.3, 8.6) in period 1 to 2.8% (1.7, 5.0) in period 3 (p < 0.001). Furthermore, rates of permanent pacemaker implantation, acute kidney injury, and paravalvular leakage ≥ moderate continuously declined over time. Accordingly, the 30-day mortality fell from 9.3% in period 1 to 4.3% in period 3 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Despite substantial guideline alterations, median patient age remained largely unchanged in our TAVI cohort over the past 12 years. Therefore, increased age still appears to be the main reason to choose TAVI over SAVR. However, risk profiles declined substantially. Significant improvements in early outcomes suggest favorable influence of less invasive access routes, improved device platforms and growing user experience.
Collapse
|
20
|
O'Hair D, Yakubov SJ, Grubb KJ, Oh JK, Ito S, Deeb GM, Van Mieghem NM, Adams DH, Bajwa T, Kleiman NS, Chetcuti S, Søndergaard L, Gada H, Mumtaz M, Heiser J, Merhi WM, Petrossian G, Robinson N, Tang GHL, Rovin JD, Little SH, Jain R, Verdoliva S, Hanson T, Li S, Popma JJ, Reardon MJ. Structural Valve Deterioration After Self-Expanding Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients at Intermediate or High Risk. JAMA Cardiol 2023; 8:111-119. [PMID: 36515976 PMCID: PMC9857153 DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.4627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Importance The frequency and clinical importance of structural valve deterioration (SVD) in patients undergoing self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) or surgery is poorly understood. Objective To evaluate the 5-year incidence, clinical outcomes, and predictors of hemodynamic SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI or surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This post hoc analysis pooled data from the CoreValve US High Risk Pivotal (n = 615) and SURTAVI (n = 1484) randomized clinical trials (RCTs); it was supplemented by the CoreValve Extreme Risk Pivotal trial (n = 485) and CoreValve Continued Access Study (n = 2178). Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis deemed to be at intermediate or increased risk of 30-day surgical mortality were included. Data were collected from December 2010 to June 2016, and data were analyzed from December 2021 to October 2022. Interventions Patients were randomized to self-expanding TAVI or surgery in the RCTs or underwent self-expanding TAVI for clinical indications in the nonrandomized studies. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was the incidence of SVD through 5 years (from the RCTs). Factors associated with SVD and its association with clinical outcomes were evaluated for the pooled RCT and non-RCT population. SVD was defined as (1) an increase in mean gradient of 10 mm Hg or greater from discharge or at 30 days to last echocardiography with a final mean gradient of 20 mm Hg or greater or (2) new-onset moderate or severe intraprosthetic aortic regurgitation or an increase of 1 grade or more. Results Of 4762 included patients, 2605 (54.7%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 82.1 (7.4) years. A total of 2099 RCT patients, including 1128 who received TAVI and 971 who received surgery, and 2663 non-RCT patients who received TAVI were included. The cumulative incidence of SVD treating death as a competing risk was lower in patients undergoing TAVI than surgery (TAVI, 2.20%; surgery, 4.38%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.27-0.78; P = .004). This lower risk was most pronounced in patients with smaller annuli (23 mm diameter or smaller; TAVI, 1.32%; surgery, 5.84%; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.06-0.73; P = .02). SVD was associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.46-2.82; P < .001), cardiovascular mortality (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.20-2.90; P = .006), and valve disease or worsening heart failure hospitalizations (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.23-3.84; P = .008). Predictors of SVD were developed from multivariate analysis. Conclusions and Relevance This study found a lower rate of SVD in patients undergoing self-expanding TAVI vs surgery at 5 years. Doppler echocardiography was a valuable tool to detect SVD, which was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01240902, NCT01586910, and NCT01531374.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel O'Hair
- Cardiovascular Service Line, Boulder Community Health, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Steven J Yakubov
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Ohio Health Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus
| | - Kendra J Grubb
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jae K Oh
- Echocardiography Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Saki Ito
- Echocardiography Core Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - G Michael Deeb
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor
| | - Nicolas M Van Mieghem
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - David H Adams
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Tanvir Bajwa
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Neal S Kleiman
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stanley Chetcuti
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor.,Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Hospitals, Ann Arbor
| | - Lars Søndergaard
- Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hemal Gada
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - Mubashir Mumtaz
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pinnacle Health, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
| | - John Heiser
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - William M Merhi
- Department of Interventional Cardiology, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - George Petrossian
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Saint Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
| | - Newell Robinson
- Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Saint Francis Hospital, Roslyn, New York
| | - Gilbert H L Tang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mount Sinai Health System, New York, New York
| | - Joshua D Rovin
- Center for Advanced Valve and Structural Heart Care, Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida
| | - Stephen H Little
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renuka Jain
- Aurora Cardiovascular Services, Aurora-St. Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Sarah Verdoliva
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Tim Hanson
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Shuzhen Li
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Jeffrey J Popma
- Structural Heart and Aortic, Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Michael J Reardon
- Department of Cardiology, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas.,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Khokhar AA, Giannini F, Zlahoda‐Huzior A, Mikhail G, Dudek D. Coronary access after ACURATE neo2 implantation for valve-in-valve TAVR: Insights from ex vivo simulations. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 100:662-666. [PMID: 36116020 PMCID: PMC9826017 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Arif A. Khokhar
- Department of CardiologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
- Digital Innovations & Robotics HubKrakowPoland
| | - Francesco Giannini
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & ResearchMaria Cecilia HospitalCotignolaItaly
| | - Adriana Zlahoda‐Huzior
- Digital Innovations & Robotics HubKrakowPoland
- Department of Measurement and ElectronicsAGH University of Science and TechnologyKrakowPoland
| | - Ghada Mikhail
- Department of CardiologyImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Interventional Cardiology Unit, GVM Care & ResearchMaria Cecilia HospitalCotignolaItaly
- Institute of CardiologyJagiellonian University Medical CollegeKrakowPoland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Khokhar AA, Ponticelli F, Zlahoda-Huzior A, Chandra K, Ruggiero R, Toselli M, Gallo F, Cereda A, Sticchi A, Laricchia A, Regazzoli D, Mangieri A, Reimers B, Biscaglia S, Tumscitz C, Campo G, Mikhail GW, Kim WK, Colombo A, Dudek D, Giannini F. Coronary access following ACURATE neo implantation for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation: Ex vivo analysis in patient-specific anatomies. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:902564. [PMID: 36187005 PMCID: PMC9515364 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.902564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Coronary access after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with supra-annular self-expandable valves may be challenging or un-feasible. There is little data concerning coronary access following transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) for degenerated surgical bioprosthesis. Aims To evaluate the feasibility and challenge of coronary access after ViV-TAVI with the supra-annular self-expandable ACURATE neo valve. Materials and methods Sixteen patients underwent ViV-TAVI with the ACURATE neo valve. Post-procedural computed tomography (CT) was used to create 3D-printed life-sized patient-specific models for bench-testing of coronary cannulation. Primary endpoint was feasibility of diagnostic angiography and PCI. Secondary endpoints included incidence of challenging cannulation for both diagnostic catheters (DC) and guiding catheters (GC). The association between challenging cannulations with aortic and transcatheter/surgical valve geometry was evaluated using pre and post-procedural CT scans. Results Diagnostic angiography and PCI were feasible for 97 and 95% of models respectively. All non-feasible procedures occurred in ostia that underwent prophylactic “chimney” stenting. DC cannulation was challenging in 17% of models and was associated with a narrower SoV width (30 vs. 35 mm, p < 0.01), STJ width (28 vs. 32 mm, p < 0.05) and shorter STJ height (15 vs. 17 mm, p < 0.05). GC cannulation was challenging in 23% of models and was associated with narrower STJ width (28 vs. 32 mm, p < 0.05), smaller transcatheter-to-coronary distance (5 vs. 9.2 mm, p < 0.05) and a worse coronary-commissural overlap angle (14.3° vs. 25.6o, p < 0.01). Advanced techniques to achieve GC cannulation were required in 22/64 (34%) of cases. Conclusion In this exploratory bench analysis, diagnostic angiography and PCI was feasible in almost all cases following ViV-TAVI with the ACURATE neo valve. Prophylactic coronary stenting, higher implantation, narrower aortic sinus dimensions and commissural misalignment were associated with an increased challenge of coronary cannulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arif A. Khokhar
- Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Digital Innovations and Robotics Hub, Kraków, Poland
- *Correspondence: Arif A. Khokhar,
| | - Francesco Ponticelli
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Adriana Zlahoda-Huzior
- Department of Measurement and Electronics, Akademia Gorniczo-Hutnicza (AGH) University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
| | - Kailash Chandra
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Rossella Ruggiero
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Marco Toselli
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| | - Francesco Gallo
- Interventional Cardiology, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Science, Ospedale dell’Angelo, Venice, Italy
| | - Alberto Cereda
- Department of Cardiology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sticchi
- Invasive Cardiology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | | | - Damiano Regazzoli
- Invasive Cardiology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Mangieri
- Invasive Cardiology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Bernhard Reimers
- Invasive Cardiology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Biscaglia
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Carlo Tumscitz
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Gianluca Campo
- Cardiovascular Institute, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Cona, Italy
| | - Ghada W. Mikhail
- Department of Cardiology, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Won-Keun Kim
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Kerckhoff Heart Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany
| | - Antonio Colombo
- Invasive Cardiology Unit, Humanitas Research Hospital, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dariusz Dudek
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
- Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Francesco Giannini
- Gruppo Villa Maria (GVM) Care and Research, Maria Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Prendergast BP, Patterson T. New paradigms for the sequential treatment of severe aortic stenosis: imaging-guided selection of the first intervention paves the way for lifetime management. EUROINTERVENTION 2022; 18:e357-e359. [PMID: 35929069 PMCID: PMC10259238 DOI: 10.4244/eij-e-22-00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard P Prendergast
- St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,Cleveland Clinic London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ohira S, Pena CDL. The role of sutureless or rapid-deployment aortic valve prosthesis in bicuspid aortic valve: Standard AVR, TAVR, or somewhere in between? J Card Surg 2022; 37:3363-3364. [PMID: 35904124 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Ohira
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Corazon De La Pena
- Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nguyen Q, Luc JGY, MacGillivray TE, Preventza OA. Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Young, Low-risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis. US CARDIOLOGY REVIEW 2022. [DOI: 10.15420/usc.2022.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Aortic stenosis is a common form of acquired degenerative valvular disease associated with poor survival after the onset of symptoms. Treatment options for patients with aortic stenosis in addition to medical therapy include surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with either tissue or mechanical valves, or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding valves via either transfemoral or alternative access routes. In this review, the authors discuss the current evidence and special considerations regarding the use of TAVR versus SAVR in the management of severe aortic stenosis in young (<65 years of age), low-risk patients, highlighting the history of aortic stenosis treatment, the current guidelines and recommendations, and important issues that remain to be addressed. Ultimately, until ongoing clinical trials with long-term follow-up data shed light on whether interventions for aortic stenosis can be broadened to a low-risk population, TAVR in young, low-risk patients should be undertaken with caution and with guidance from a multidisciplinary heart team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quynh Nguyen
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jessica GY Luc
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Thomas E MacGillivray
- Division of Cardiac Surgery and Thoracic Transplantation Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart and Vascular Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ourania A Preventza
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhang X, Puehler T, Frank D, Sathananthan J, Sellers S, Meier D, Both M, Blanke P, Seoudy H, Saad M, Müller OJ, Sondergaard L, Lutter G. TAVR for All? The Surgical Perspective. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2022; 9:jcdd9070223. [PMID: 35877585 PMCID: PMC9323639 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd9070223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
In spite of the noninferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in high- and intermediate-risk patients, there are still obstacles that need to be overcome before the procedure is further expanded and clinically integrated. The lack of evidence on the long-term durability of the bioprostheses used for TAVR remains of particular concern. In addition, surgery may be preferred over TAVR in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) or with concomitant pathologies such as other valve diseases (mitral regurgitation/tricuspid regurgitation), aortopathy, and coronary artery disease. In this review, we discuss and summarize relevant data from clinical trials, current trends, and remaining obstacles, and provide our perspective on the indications for the expansion of TAVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiling Zhang
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (X.Z.); (T.P.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Thomas Puehler
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (X.Z.); (T.P.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - Derk Frank
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology, and Critical Care), University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (D.F.); (H.S.); (M.S.); (O.J.M.)
| | - Janarthanan Sathananthan
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; (J.S.); (S.S.); (D.M.)
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, St Paul’s and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Stephanie Sellers
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; (J.S.); (S.S.); (D.M.)
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, St Paul’s and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
- Cardiovascular Translational Laboratory, Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - David Meier
- Centre for Heart Lung Innovation & Providence Research, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada; (J.S.); (S.S.); (D.M.)
- Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, St Paul’s and Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
- Centre for Heart Valve Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Marcus Both
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Philipp Blanke
- Department of Radiology, St. Paul’s Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6E 1M7, Canada;
| | - Hatim Seoudy
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology, and Critical Care), University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (D.F.); (H.S.); (M.S.); (O.J.M.)
| | - Mohammed Saad
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology, and Critical Care), University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (D.F.); (H.S.); (M.S.); (O.J.M.)
| | - Oliver J. Müller
- Department of Internal Medicine III (Cardiology, Angiology, and Critical Care), University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (D.F.); (H.S.); (M.S.); (O.J.M.)
| | - Lars Sondergaard
- Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark;
| | - Georg Lutter
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (X.Z.); (T.P.)
- German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, 24105 Kiel, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-(0)4-3150-0220-31; Fax: +49-(0)0-4315-0022-048
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
The role of mechanical valves in the aortic position in the era of bioprostheses and TAVR: Evidence-based appraisal and focus on the On-X valve. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 72:31-40. [PMID: 35738422 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Patients who need a prosthetic aortic heart valve may decide, working with their cardiologist and cardiac surgeon, among a variety of options: surgical or transcatheter approach, bioprosthetic or mechanical valve, or a Ross procedure if suitable to their age and anatomy. This review article examines the evidence for survival benefit with mechanical aortic valves, discusses bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration and its consequences, and considers the risks of redo aortic valve surgery or subsequent valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter intervention. It highlights the unique characteristics of the On-X aortic valve, including the US Food and Drug Administration approved and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline supported reduced anticoagulation target INR of 1.5 to 2.0, and discusses the PROACT Xa trial comparing apixaban vs warfarin anticoagulation. The choice of prosthetic valve should be individualized, carefully considering each patient's unique circumstances. In that context, the On-X aortic valve offers a potential lifetime solution without need for a repeat operation, while minimizing the risks of long-term anticoagulation. In an era of enthusiasm for bioprosthetic and transcatheter-based approaches, the option of a second-generation bileaflet mechanical valve with optimized hemodynamics-the On-X aortic valve-may well align with patient expectations.
Collapse
|
28
|
Webb JG, Blanke P, Meier D, Sathananthan J, Lauck S, Chatfield AG, Jelijevas J, Wood DA, Akodad M. TAVI in 2022: Remaining issues and future direction. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2022; 115:235-242. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2022.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
29
|
Hong N, Pan W, Chen S, Zhang X, Zhou D, Ge J. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis in Chinese Patients. JACC. ASIA 2022; 2:210-212. [PMID: 36339120 PMCID: PMC9627882 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Daxin Zhou
- Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Research Unit of Cardiovascular Techniques and Devices, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 180, Fenglin Road, Shanghai 200032, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:2729-2750. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
31
|
Successful transcatheter aortic valve in JenaValve in homograft implantation in a 33-year-old heart failure patient after aortic and mitral valve replacement due to severe endocarditis 18 years ago. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 40S:322-324. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
32
|
Westermann D, Ludwig S, Kalbacher D, Spink C, Linder M, Bhadra OD, Nikorowitsch J, Waldschmidt L, Demal T, Voigtländer L, Schaefer A, Seiffert M, Pecha S, Schofer N, Greenbaum AB, Reichenspurner H, Blankenberg S, Conradi L, Schirmer J. Prevention of coronary obstruction in patients at risk undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Hamburg BASILICA experience. Clin Res Cardiol 2021; 110:1900-1911. [PMID: 34156524 PMCID: PMC8639537 DOI: 10.1007/s00392-021-01881-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess the clinical outcome of the bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary obstruction (BASILICA) technique in a single-center patient cohort considered at high or prohibitive risk of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)-induced coronary obstruction. METHODS Between October 2019 and January 2021, a total of 15 consecutive patients (age 81.0 [78.1, 84.4] years; 53.3% female; EuroSCORE II 10.6 [6.3, 14.8] %) underwent BASILICA procedure prior to TAVI at our institution. Indications for TAVI were degeneration of stented (n = 12, 80.0%) or stentless (n = 1, 6.7%) bioprosthetic aortic valves, or calcific stenosis of native aortic valves (n = 2, 13.3%), respectively. Individual risk of TAVI-induced coronary obstruction was assessed by pre-procedural computed tomography analysis. Procedural and 30-day outcomes were documented in accordance with Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2 criteria. RESULTS BASILICA was attempted for single left coronary cusp in 12 patients (80.0%), for single right coronary cusp in 2 patients (13.3%), and for both cusps in 1 patient (6.7%), respectively. The procedure was feasible in 13 patients (86.7%) resulting in effective prevention of coronary obstruction, whilst TAVI was performed without prior successful bioprosthetic leaflet laceration in two patients (13.3%). In one of these patients (6.7%), additional chimney stenting immediately after TAVI was performed. No all-cause deaths or strokes were documented after 30 days. CONCLUSION The BASILICA technique appears to be a feasible, safe and effective concept to avoid iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction during TAVI in both native and bioprosthetic valves of patients at high or prohibitive risk. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04227002 (Hamburg AoRtic Valve cOhoRt).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dirk Westermann
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Ludwig
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Kalbacher
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Clemens Spink
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Linder
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Oliver D Bhadra
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Julius Nikorowitsch
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lara Waldschmidt
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Till Demal
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lisa Voigtländer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schaefer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Seiffert
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Simon Pecha
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Niklas Schofer
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Adam B Greenbaum
- Structural Heart and Valve Center, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Hermann Reichenspurner
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Blankenberg
- Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lenard Conradi
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Luebeck/Kiel, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Schirmer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Younger Patients: A New Challenge. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA 2021; 57:medicina57090883. [PMID: 34577806 PMCID: PMC8466138 DOI: 10.3390/medicina57090883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The number of aortic stenosis patients in Western countries is increasing, along with better life conditions and expectancies. Presently, the volume of percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantations (TAVIs) is incessantly increasing, and has already overcome the surgical replacement procedure volume. According to the literature, TAVI is a feasible procedure even among low surgical risk patients, and American guidelines have extended the indications for TAVI, including shifting patient evaluations from high/low STS scores to old/young patients, a "paradigm shift" of aortic stenosis evaluation. As a result, low-risk young (<75 years-old) population management could be the next challenge in cardiology. To manage the life conditions of a 65 year old patient affected by aortic stenosis who is undergoing TAVI, one of the most crucial issue will be bioprosthesis durability and the appropriate intervention to make in cases of valve dysfunction or failure.
Collapse
|