Pharmacotherapy in Type 1 Diabetes

Efficacy of Fasting in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

Over the last decade, studies suggested that dietary behavior modification, including fasting, can improve metabolic and cardiovascular markers as well as body composition. Given the increasing prevalence of people with type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the increasing obesity (also in combination with diabetes), nutritional therapies are gaining importance, besides pharmaceutical interventions. Fasting has demonstrated beneficial effects for both healthy individuals and those with metabolic diseases, leading to increased research interest in its impact on glycemia and associated short- and long-term complications. Therefore, this review aimed to investigate whether fasting can be used safely and effectively in addition to medications to support the therapy in T1DM and T2DM. A literature search on fasting and its interaction with diabetes was conducted via PubMed in September 2022. Fasting has the potential to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia in T1DM, lower glycaemic variability, and improve fat metabolism in T1DM and T2DM. It also increases insulin sensitivity, reduces endogenous glucose production in diabetes, lowers body weight, and improves body composition. To conclude, fasting is efficient for therapy management for both people with T1DM and T2DM and can be safely performed, when necessary, with the support of health care professionals.

"Smart" Composite Microneedle Patch Stabilizes Glucagon and Prevents Nocturnal Hypoglycemia: Experimental Studies and Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Hypoglycemia is a major complication associated with insulin therapy in people with diabetes that could cause life-threatening conditions if untreated. Glucagon, a counter-acting hormone, is thus administered for rescue of severe hypoglycemia. However, due to the instability of glucagon, only limited medications are available for emergency use, which are unsuitable for patients with hypoglycemia unawareness or with the inability to self-administer, especially during sleep (namely, nocturnal hypoglycemia). To prevent unattended and extended hypoglycemia, we designed a "smart" composite microneedle (cMN) patch capable of stabilizing glucagon, sensing hypoglycemia, and delivering glucagon automatically on demand. In this design, native glucagon was encapsulated in glucose-responsive microgels containing a glucagon-stabilizing component rationally selected by molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. A cMN patch was then prepared by incorporating the glucagon microgels with poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride) (PMVE-MAH) and poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) followed by thermal cross-linking. The rationally designed zwitterionic polymer-based microgels preserved the native structure of glucagon and prevented heat-induced fibrillation evidenced by RP-HPLC, circular dichroism, and transmission electron microscopy. MD simulations suggested that the polymeric microgels stabilized glucagon by inhibition of oligomer formation via peptide-polymer noncovalent interactions. The polymer formed multiple hydrogen bonds with the polar and charged amino acid residues of the glucagon molecule, shielding the peptide surface from aggregation. In vivo efficacy studies using streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic (T1D) rats demonstrated that the glucagon-loaded cMN patch could prevent hypoglycemia induced by insulin overdose during a 12 h period. The results suggest that this new glucagon "smart" patch may be a promising system for improving the quality of life of those suffering from nocturnal hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia unawareness.

Sex-specific association between type 1 diabetes and the risk of end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This meta-analysis was conducted given the inconsistent findings of studies regarding the sex discrepancy in the relationship between type 1 diabetes (T1D) and the risk of end-stage renal disease (ESRD).

METHODS

Articles published on PubMed between January 1, 1966 and March 31, 2019 were systematically retrieved without language restrictions. The included articles all presented sex-specific data of the incidence rate ratio, standardized incidence or mortality ratio, hazard ratio, relative risk, or odds ratio, or provided data to estimate the association between T1D and ESRD or kidney disease-related mortality. The gender-specific effect estimates and pooled ratio (female-to-male) for ESRD and for deaths from T1D-related renal disease were acquired via a random-effects meta-analysis with inverse variance weighting, regardless of heterogeneity evaluated based on the I² statistic.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies, including 122,842 individuals, were finally selected for this meta-analysis. Sex differences in effect estimates were found in ESRD (pooled ratio = 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.69-0.94)) with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 66.9%), but not in mortality with T1D-associated renal disease.

CONCLUSION

Women with T1D have a lower risk of ESRD compared with that in men, but this finding may be biased by potential confounding factors and must be verified by other well-planned prospective studies.

Importance of integrating nanotechnology with pharmacology and physiology for innovative drug delivery and therapy - an illustration with firsthand examples

Nanotechnology has been applied extensively in drug delivery to improve the therapeutic outcomes of various diseases. Tremendous efforts have been focused on the development of novel nanoparticles and delineation of the physicochemical properties of nanoparticles in relation to their biological fate and functions. However, in the design and evaluation of these nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems, the pharmacology of delivered drugs and the (patho-)physiology of the host have received less attention. In this review, we discuss important pharmacological mechanisms, physiological characteristics, and pathological factors that have been integrated into the design of nanotechnology-enabled drug delivery systems and therapies. Firsthand examples are presented to illustrate the principles and advantages of such integrative design strategies for cancer treatment by exploiting 1) intracellular synergistic interactions of drug-drug and drug-nanomaterial combinations to overcome multidrug-resistant cancer, 2) the blood flow direction of the circulatory system to maximize drug delivery to the tumor neovasculature and cells overexpressing integrin receptors for lung metastases, 3) endogenous lipoproteins to decorate nanocarriers and transport them across the blood-brain barrier for brain metastases, and 4) distinct pathological factors in the tumor microenvironment to develop pH- and oxidative stress-responsive hybrid manganese dioxide nanoparticles for enhanced radiotherapy. Regarding the application in diabetes management, a nanotechnology-enabled closed-loop insulin delivery system was devised to provide dynamic insulin release at a physiologically relevant time scale and glucose levels. These examples, together with other research results, suggest that utilization of the interplay of pharmacology, (patho-)physiology and nanotechnology is a facile approach to develop innovative drug delivery systems and therapies with high efficiency and translational potential.

A critical review and analysis of ethical issues associated with the artificial pancreas

The artificial pancreas combines a hormone infusion pump with a continuous glucose monitoring device, supported by a dosing algorithm currently installed on the pump. It allows for dynamic infusions of insulin (and possibly other hormones such as glucagon) tailored to patient needs. For patients with type 1 diabetes the artificial pancreas has been shown to prevent more effectively hypoglycaemic events and hyperglycaemia than insulin pump therapy and has the potential to simplify care. However, the potential ethical issues associated with the upcoming integration of the artificial pancreas into clinical practice have not yet been discussed. Our objective was to identify and articulate ethical issues associated with artificial pancreas use for patients, healthcare professionals, industry and policymakers. We performed a literature review to identify clinical, psychosocial and technical issues raised by the artificial pancreas and subsequently analysed them through a common bioethics framework. We identified five sensitive domains of ethical issues. Patient confidentiality and safety can be jeopardized by the artificial pancreas' vulnerability to security breaches or unauthorized data sharing. Public and private coverage of the artificial pancreas could be cost-effective and warranted. Patient selection criteria need to ensure equitable access and sensitivity to patient-reported outcomes. Patient coaching and support by healthcare professionals or industry representatives could help foster realistic expectations in patients. Finally, the artificial pancreas increases the visibility of diabetes and could generate issues related to personal identity and patient agency. The timely consideration of these issues will optimize the technological development and clinical uptake of the artificial pancreas.

EADSG Guidelines: Insulin Therapy in Diabetes

A diagnosis of diabetes or hyperglycemia should be confirmed prior to ordering, dispensing, or administering insulin (A). Insulin is the primary treatment in all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) (A). Typically, patients with T1DM will require initiation with multiple daily injections at the time of diagnosis. This is usually short-acting insulin or rapid-acting insulin analogue given 0 to 15 min before meals together with one or more daily separate injections of intermediate or long-acting insulin. Two or three premixed insulin injections per day may be used (A). The target glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) for all children with T1DM, including preschool children, is recommended to be < 7.5% (< 58 mmol/mol). The target is chosen aiming at minimizing hyperglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemic unawareness, and reducing the likelihood of development of long-term complications (B). For patients prone to glycemic variability, glycemic control is best evaluated by a combination of results with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (B). Indications for exogenous insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) include acute illness or surgery, pregnancy, glucose toxicity, contraindications to or failure to achieve goals with oral antidiabetic medications, and a need for flexible therapy (B). In T2DM patients, with regards to achieving glycemic goals, insulin is considered alone or in combination with oral agents when HbA1c is ≥ 7.5% (≥ 58 mmol/mol); and is essential for treatment in those with HbA1c ≥ 10% (≥ 86 mmol/mol), when diet, physical activity, and other antihyperglycemic agents have been optimally used (B). The preferred method of insulin initiation in T2DM is to begin by adding a long-acting (basal) insulin or once-daily premixed/co-formulation insulin or twice-daily premixed insulin, alone or in combination with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) or in combination with other oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (B). If the desired glucose targets are not met, rapid-acting or short-acting (bolus or prandial) insulin can be added at mealtime to control the expected postprandial raise in glucose. An insulin regimen should be adopted and individualized but should, to the extent possible, closely resemble a natural physiologic state and avoid, to the extent possible, wide fluctuating glucose levels (C). Blood glucose monitoring is an integral part of effective insulin therapy and should not be omitted in the patient's care plan. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values should be used to titrate basal insulin, whereas both FPG and postprandial glucose (PPG) values should be used to titrate mealtime insulin (B). Metformin combined with insulin is associated with decreased weight gain, lower insulin dose, and less hypoglycemia when compared with insulin alone (C). Oral medications should not be abruptly discontinued when starting insulin therapy because of the risk of rebound hyperglycemia (D). Analogue insulin is as effective as human insulin but is associated with less postprandial hyperglycemia and delayed hypoglycemia (B). The shortest needles (currently the 4-mm pen and 6-mm syringe needles) are safe, effective, and less painful and should be the first-line choice in all patient categories; intramuscular (IM) injections should be avoided, especially with long-acting insulins, because severe hypoglycemia may result; lipohypertrophy is a frequent complication of therapy that distorts insulin absorption, and therefore, injections and infusions should not be given into these lesions and correct site rotation will help prevent them (A). Many patients in East Africa reuse syringes for various reasons, including financial. This is not recommended by the manufacturer and there is an association between needle reuse and lipohypertrophy. However, patients who reuse needles should not be subjected to alarming claims of excessive morbidity from this practice (A). Health care authorities and planners should be alerted to the risks associated with syringe or pen needles 6 mm or longer in children (A).

Patterns, Policy and Appropriateness: A 12-Year Utilization Review of Blood Glucose Test Strip Use in Insulin Users

OBJECTIVES

Considerable attention has been paid to the rising costs of the use of blood glucose test strips (BGTS). Insulin users have generally been treated as a single homogeneous group, resulting in policies that cap usage (8.2 strips/day) in provincial drug insurance programs. The objective of this study was to conduct a utilization review of BGTS by insulin users and to evaluate use patterns against current insulin use patterns and BGTS policy.

METHODS

BGTS usage was examined in a cohort of insulin users with type 1 and type 2 diabetes over a 12-year period (2001 to 2013) using the population-based administrative data in Manitoba, Canada.

RESULTS

Total BGTS strip use increased by 121%, from $4.3 to $9.5 million. However, the number of insulin users also increased by 115%. Use has been stable at 1.5 strips per day per person since 2004 by insulin users with type 2 diabetes but has risen from 1.9 to 3.0 strips per day per person in those with type 1 diabetes. Mean daily test strip use was below the number of daily tests recommended for patients using insulin as per the current Canadian guidelines, with 11% and 15% of insulin users with type 1 and type 2 diabetes not claiming any BGTS use and a further 15% (type 1) and 28% (type 2) using fewer than 1 strip per day.

CONCLUSIONS

BGTS use per insulin user has been stable for most of the past decade, and the vast majority of use falls well below provincial insurance caps. The amount of low-level testing (0 to <1 strip/day) suggests that greater attention should be directed to ensuring a safe level of testing by all insulin users.

Differences in self-monitored, blood glucose test strip utilization by therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To determine whether blood glucose test strip (BGTS) utilization in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with the type of diabetes therapy, classified according to hypoglycemic risk.

METHODS

A retrospective, longitudinal (2006-2012) study of Canadian private drug plans (PDP) and Ontario Public Drug Programs (OPDP) prescription claims was conducted. Analyses were restricted to patients with T2D with or without a claim for BGTS. Daily BGTS utilization (TS/patient/day) was evaluated by diabetes therapy classified by hypoglycemic risk. Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify determinants of BGTS utilization.

RESULTS

The T2D cohort comprised 5,759,591 observations from 1,949,129 claimants. Mean BGTS utilization was 0.84 TS/patient/day and differed between PDP and OPDP (0.66 vs. 1.00). Daily utilization was greatest in patients receiving therapy associated with a pre-defined high risk of hypoglycemia [insulin: basal + bolus (2.16), premixed (1.65), basal (1.16), other insulin regimens (2.13), and sulfonylureas (0.74)] versus non-sulfonylurea non-insulin-based regimens (0.52). For non-insulin therapy, BGTS utilization was greater for patients on multiple non-insulin therapies versus monotherapy (0.74 vs. 0.53 TS/patient/day). In multivariate analyses, drivers for BGTS utilization included insulin use, previous BGTS use, and female gender. Previous diabetes therapy and duration of therapy were negatively correlated with BGTS utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

BGTS utilization varies depending on the type of therapy used to treat T2D according to hypoglycemic risk. Decision making regarding BGTS needs to account for robust analyses of current utilization and its value in those settings, including in patients not receiving diabetes therapy and the prevalence of circumstances conducive to more intensive monitoring.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin in patients with type 1 versus type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS

To compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) versus type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in order to explore the potential of dapagliflozin as add-on therapy to insulin in patients with T1DM.

METHODS

Steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dapagliflozin (1-100 mg) were evaluated in a meta-analysis of patients with T1DM or T2DM. A model was constructed of the relationship between dapagliflozin systemic exposure and urinary glucose excretion (UGE) in patients with T1DM versus those with T2DM.

RESULTS

Data were analysed from 160 patients (T1DM, n = 70; T2DM, n = 90). Dapagliflozin systemic exposure (maximum concentration and area under the curve) increased similarly in a dose-related manner in both patient populations. Dose-dependent increases in 24-h UGE were observed with dapagliflozin in both populations. Unadjusted results showed that with regard to UGE response, dapagliflozin was more potent in patients with T1DM {mean half-maximum effective concentration [EC50 ] = 2.72 ng/ml [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14, 5.08]} than in patients with T2DM [EC50  = 12.2 ng/ml (95% CI 4.91, 21.1)]. After normalization for baseline fasting plasma glucose, estimated glomerular filtration rate and UGE, however, the UGE potency of dapagliflozin was similar between the two populations [T1DM: mean EC50 , 8.12 ng/ml (95% CI 2.95, 14.6); T2DM: mean EC50 , 7.75 ng/ml (95% CI 1.35, 18.1)].

CONCLUSIONS

Dapagliflozin pharmacokinetics and the predicted UGE dose exposure response to dapagliflozin were similar in patients with T1DM and those with T2DM and suggest that the dapagliflozin dosages currently used for the treatment of T2DM may provide benefit as add-on therapy to insulin in patients with T1DM.

Risk of all-cause mortality and vascular events in women versus men with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested sex differences in the mortality rate associated with type 1 diabetes. We did a meta-analysis to provide reliable estimates of any sex differences in the effect of type 1 diabetes on risk of all-cause mortality and cause-specific outcomes.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed for studies published between Jan 1, 1966, and Nov 26, 2014. Selected studies reported sex-specific estimates of the standardised mortality ratio (SMR) or hazard ratios associated with type 1 diabetes, either for all-cause mortality or cause-specific outcomes. We used random effects meta-analyses with inverse variance weighting to obtain sex-specific SMRs and their pooled ratio (women to men) for all-cause mortality, for mortality from cardiovascular disease, renal disease, cancer, the combined outcome of accident and suicide, and from incident coronary heart disease and stroke associated with type 1 diabetes.

FINDINGS

Data from 26 studies including 214 114 individuals and 15 273 events were included. The pooled women-to-men ratio of the SMR for all-cause mortality was 1·37 (95% CI 1·21-1·56), for incident stroke 1·37 (1·03-1·81), for fatal renal disease 1·44 (1·02-2·05), and for fatal cardiovascular diseases 1·86 (1·62-2·15). For incident coronary heart disease the sex difference was more extreme; the pooled women-to-men ratio of the SMR was 2·54 (95% CI 1·80-3·60). No evidence suggested a sex difference for mortality associated with type 1 diabetes from cancer, or accident and suicide.

INTERPRETATION

Women with type 1 diabetes have a roughly 40% greater excess risk of all-cause mortality, and twice the excess risk of fatal and nonfatal vascular events, compared with men with type 1 diabetes.

FUNDING

None.