The Impact of COVID-19 on Diabetes Research in Canada

The impact of COVID-19 on medical students

Objective

The outbreak of COVID-19 has disrupted social order and placed a heavy burden on the healthcare system. The pandemic also has an unprecedented impact on medical students.

Methods

We searched PubMed for articles related to COVID-19 and medical students from January 2020 to December 2022. A total of 5358 studies were retrieved and after screening, 176 studies were finally included in this review.

Results

The impact of COVID-19 on medical students is widespread and profound. First reflected in the transformation of educational models. In the early days, education model quickly shifted from offline to online. In terms of clinical exposure, most students have been suspended from internships, while in some areas with staff shortages they have the opportunity to continue clinical work. Scientific research of medical students is also difficult to carry out due to COVID-19. The epidemic has also seriously damaged students' mental health, and this impact won't simply disappear with the improvement of the epidemic situation. The career intentions of medical students may also become firmer or change due to COVID-19. International medical electives have also been negatively affected by COVID-19 due to travel restriction. Even in the postpandemic era, with the gradual resumption of work, production and school, medical students are still affected in some ways by COVID-19.

Conclusion

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on both the education of medical students and their personal development. Through COVID-19, we should reflect on what models of medical education should be developed in the future. Based on the experiences learned from COVID-19, we believe that a more flexible blended education model may be the most promising.

Impact of COVID-19 disease on clinical research in pediatric and congenital cardiology

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 triggered an unprecedented crisis affecting society at every level. Research in pediatric and congenital cardiology is currently in full development and may have been disrupted. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of COVID-19 on pediatric and congenital cardiology clinical research and to analyze decision-making and adaptation processes, from a panel of ongoing academic and industry-sponsored research at the time of the pandemic.

METHODS

This observational study was carried out in April 2020, from a CHD clinical research network involving five tertiary care pediatric and congenital cardiology centers. Investigators and clinical research assistants from each participating research center completed an online survey questionnaire, and each principal investigator underwent a 1-h web-based videoconference interview.

RESULTS

A total of 34 study questionnaires were collected, reporting that 18 studies were totally suspended. Upon the investigator's decision, after discussion on ethical issues and with facilitating support from health authorities, 16 studies were resumed. The rate of study suspension in interventional research (53%) was similar to that in non-interventional research (56%). Logistical problems were predominantly reported in both continued and suspended trials. Research protocols were adapted, largely thanks to telemedicine, which in some cases even improved the course of the study.

CONCLUSION

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical research in pediatric and congenital cardiology has been limited by a rapid adaptation of all research structures and an extensive use of telemedicine at all stages of the studies.

Transition of Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: Predictors of Health-Care Utilization After Transition to Adult Care From Population-Based Administrative Data

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we aimed to compare health-care visits pre- and posttransition from pediatric to adult care between youth with type 2 and type 1 diabetes.

METHODS

We linked a clinical database with the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository to compare health-care visits 2 years before and after transition, and investigated baseline factors influencing health-care engagement.

RESULTS

Youth with type 2 diabetes (n=196) vs type 1 diabetes (n=456) were more likely to be female (61% vs 44%), older at diagnosis (13.6 vs 10.6 years), live in northern regions and to be in the lowest socioeconomic status quartile (53% vs 5.4%). Seventy-six percent of youth with type 2 diabetes attended a follow-up visit within 2 years of transition compared to 97% of youth with type 1 diabetes. Youth with type 2 diabetes had higher rates of hospitalization pretransition (19.6 vs 11.6 admissions/100 patient years) and posttransition (24.7 vs 11.7 admissions/100 patient years) and fewer medical visits (pretransition: 2.4 vs 3.0 visits/person year [p<0.01]; posttransition: 1.6 vs 2.1 visits/person year [p<0.01]). Accounting for sex, geography, age, education, socioeconomic status and diabetes type, achieving 4 visits in 2 years posttransition was predicted by the number of visits pretransition (odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 1.49) and diabetes type (type 2 diabetes: odds ratio, 0.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Youth with type 2 diabetes attend fewer medical follow-up visits pre- and posttransition to adult care compared to youth with type 1 diabetes. Focused, informed, specific transition planning is needed that addresses the unique characteristics of this population.