Non-invasive cardiac output monitor validation study in pediatric cardiac surgery patients

Non-invasive pulse arrival time is associated with cardiac index in pediatric heart transplant patients with normal ejection fraction

Objective.Cardiac Index (CI) is a key physiologic parameter to ensure end organ perfusion in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Determination of CI requires invasive cardiac measurements and is not routinely done at the PICU bedside. To date, there is no gold standard non-invasive means to determine CI. This study aims to use a novel non-invasive methodology, based on routine continuous physiologic data, called Pulse Arrival Time (PAT) as a surrogate for CI in patients with normal Ejection Fraction (EF).Approach.Electrocardiogram (ECG) and photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals were collected from beside monitors at a sampling frequency of 250 samples per second. Continuous PAT, derived from the ECG and PPG waveforms was averaged per patient. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated between PAT and CI, PAT and heart rate (HR), and PAT and EF.Main Results.Twenty patients underwent right heart cardiac catheterization. The mean age of patients was 11.7 ± 5.4 years old, ranging from 11 months old to 19 years old, the median age was 13.4 years old. HR in this cohort was 93.8 ± 17.0 beats per minute. The average EF was 54.4 ± 9.6%. The average CI was 3.51 ± 0.72 l min-1m-2, with ranging from 2.6 to 4.77 l min-1m-2. The average PAT was 0.31 ± 0.12 s. Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between PAT and CI (0.57,p< 0.01). Pearson correlation between HR and CI, and correlation between EF and CI was 0.22 (p= 0.35) and 0.03 (p= 0.23) respectively. The correlation between PAT, when indexed by HR (i.e. PAT × HR), and CI minimally improved to 0.58 (p< 0.01).Significance.This pilot study demonstrates that PAT may serve as a valuable surrogate marker for CI at the bedside, as a non-invasive and continuous modality in the PICU. The use of PAT in clinical practice remains to be thoroughly investigated.

Early-Stage Vasoactive-Inotropic Score and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following Cardiac Surgery: A Comparison of Two Non-invasive Heart Function Monitoring Technologies in the Prognosis of Infants

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the efficiencies of the vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting the condition and prognosis of children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of 104 infants aged < 1 year who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The maximum and mean postoperative VIS in the first and second 24 hours [VIS (24MAX), VIS (24MEA), VIS (48MAX), and VIS (48MEA)] were recorded. Similarly, LVEF within 24 hours following surgery was monitored. Receiver operator curve (ROC), regression analysis, chi-square test, and t-test were used to analyze both heart function monitoring technologies Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that VIS was strongly associated with adverse events and death [area under ROC (AUROC) > 0.90, P = 0.00], with the two most representative scores being VIS (24MEA) and VIS (48MAX), with cut-off points of 19.42 (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 93.90%) and 22 (sensitivity = 100%; specificity = 93.90%), respectively for death, and 18.02 (sensitivity = 91.70%; specificity = 89.10%) and 17.75 (sensitivity = 91.70%; specificity = 90.20%), respectively for adverse events. Infants with higher VIS had significantly higher mortality, higher incidence of clinical adverse events, higher lactic acid value, and longer mechanical ventilation and ICU stay (P < 0.05). However, LVEF within 24 hours following surgery was not associated with death (AUROC = 0.65, P = 0.33) or adverse events (AUROC = 0.53, P = 0.81). Moreover, there was no significant change in the length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and lactate value (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Vasoactive-inotropic score at an early stage following surgery was significantly associated with the condition and prognosis of infants with congenital heart disease; however, the predictive value of LVEF within 24 hours following surgery was lower.

Postoperative nursing care of a child with pulmonary artery displacement combined with slide tracheobronchial plasty

BACKGROUND

Generally, pulmonary artery sling operation involves the pulmonary artery transplantation to be cut off. Nursing care is focused on the postoperative pulmonary vascular anastomosis, respiratory tract, and blood pressure after surgery. We report the case of an infant who underwent pulmonary artery tracheal transposition combined with Slide keratoplasty, where the pulmonary artery transplantation was not cut off. We highlight that postoperative pulmonary artery blood flow to the unobstructed airway and airway reconstruction surgery should be focused on to help children recover and ensure successful surgery.

METHODS

To report the postoperative nursing experience of one patient with pulmonary artery sling undergoing pulmonary tracheal transposition combined with Slide arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Throughout the postoperative care, airway management should be focused on to maintain circulation stability in the early postoperative period, and corresponding measures such as posture management, atomization inhalation, and improved chest physical therapy should be applied according to the special surgical method of the case in order to reduce airway complications and to improve the surgical success rate of children with pulmonary artery sling undergoing pulmonary tracheal transposition combined with Slide arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

In similar cases, after pulmonary tracheal transposition and Slide angioplasty, the doctors and nurses should pay attention to early circulation stability and focus on airway management through careful treatment and nursing, so as to promote the child's recovery.

Cardiac Output Measurement in Neonates and Children Using Noninvasive Electrical Bioimpedance Compared With Standard Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and meta-analyze the validity of electrical bioimpedance-based noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in pediatrics compared with standard methods such as thermodilution and echocardiography.

DATA SOURCES

Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE and EMBASE (2000-2019).

STUDY SELECTION

Method-comparison studies of transthoracic electrical velocimetry or whole body electrical bioimpedance versus standard cardiac output monitoring methods in children (0-18 yr old) were included.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Mean differences of cardiac output, stroke volume, or cardiac index measurements were pooled using a random-effects model (R Core Team, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2019). Bland-Altman statistics assessing agreement between devices and author conclusions about inferiority/noninferiority were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-nine of 649 identified studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and 25 studies in the meta-analyses. No significant difference was found between means of cardiac output, stroke volume, and cardiac index measurements, except in exclusively neonatal/infant studies reporting stroke volume (mean difference, 1.00 mL; 95% CI, 0.23-1.77). Median percentage error in child/adolescent studies approached acceptability (percentage error less than or equal to 30%) for cardiac output in L/min (31%; range, 13-158%) and stroke volume in mL (26%; range, 14-27%), but not in neonatal/infant studies (45%; range, 29-53% and 45%; range, 28-70%, respectively). Twenty of 29 studies concluded that transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance was noninferior. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry was considered inferior in six of nine studies with heterogeneous congenital heart disease populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses demonstrated no significant difference between means of compared devices (except in neonatal stroke volume studies). The wide range of percentage error reported may be due to heterogeneity of study designs, devices, and populations included. Transthoracic electrical velocimetry/whole body electrical bioimpedance may be acceptable for use in child/adolescent populations, but validity in neonates and congenital heart disease patients remains uncertain. Larger studies in specific clinical contexts with standardized methodologies are required.

Electrical velocimetry has limited accuracy and precision and moderate trending ability compared with transthoracic echocardiography for cardiac output measurement during cesarean delivery: A prospective observational study

We aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interchangeability of stroke volume and cardiac output measured by electrical velocimetry and transthoracic echocardiography during cesarean delivery.We enrolled 20 parturients in this prospective observational study. We recorded the stroke volume and cardiac output using both methods and compared the values at seven specific time points. We analyzed the data using linear regression analysis for Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis to determine percentage errors. We conducted a trending ability analysis based on the four-quadrant plot with the concordance rate and correlation coefficient.We recorded 124 paired datasets during cesarean delivery. The correlation coefficients of the measured cardiac output and stroke volume between the two methods were 0.397 (P < .001) and 0.357 (P < .001). The 95% limits of agreement were -1.0 to 8.1 L min for cardiac output and -10.4 to 90.4 ml for stroke volume. Moreover, the corresponding percentage errors were 62% and 60%. The concordance correlation coefficients were 0.447 (95% CI: 0.313-0.564) for stroke volume and 0.562 (95% CI: 0.442-0.662) for cardiac output. Both methods showed a moderate trending ability for stroke volume (concordance rate: 82% (95% CI: 72-90%)) and cardiac output (concordance rate: 85% (95% CI: 78-93%)).Our findings indicated that electrical velocimetry monitoring has limited accuracy, precision, and interchangeability with transthoracic echocardiography; however, it had a moderate trending ability for stroke volume and cardiac output measurements during cesarean delivery.

Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiac output monitoring is used in critically ill and high-risk surgical patients. Intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution and transpulmonary thermodilution, considered the gold standard, are invasive and linked to complications. Therefore, many non-invasive cardiac output devices have been developed and studied. One of those is electrical cardiometry. The results of validation studies are conflicting, which emphasize the need for definitive validation of accuracy and precision. We performed a database search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library of Clinical Trials to identify studies comparing cardiac output measurement by electrical cardiometry and a reference method. Pooled bias, limits of agreement (LoA) and mean percentage error (MPE) were calculated using a random-effects model. A pooled MPE of less than 30% was considered clinically acceptable. A total of 13 studies in adults (620 patients) and 11 studies in pediatrics (603 patients) were included. For adults, pooled bias was 0.03 L min^-1 [95% CI - 0.23; 0.29], LoA - 2.78 to 2.84 L min^-1 and MPE 48.0%. For pediatrics, pooled bias was - 0.02 L min^-1 [95% CI - 0.09; 0.05], LoA - 1.22 to 1.18 L min^-1 and MPE 42.0%. Inter-study heterogeneity was high for both adults (I² = 93%, p < 0.0001) and pediatrics (I² = 86%, p < 0.0001). Despite the low bias for both adults and pediatrics, the MPE was not clinically acceptable. Electrical cardiometry cannot replace thermodilution and transthoracic echocardiography for the measurement of absolute cardiac output values. Future research should explore it's clinical use and indications.

Regional anesthesia to ameliorate postoperative analgesia outcomes in pediatric surgical patients: an updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Regional anesthesia is becoming increasingly popular among anesthesiologists in the management of postoperative analgesia following pediatric surgery. The main objective of this review was to systematically evaluate the last 5 years of randomized controlled trials on the role of regional anesthesia techniques in alleviating postoperative pain associated with various pediatric surgical procedures. Forty studies on 2,408 pediatric patients were evaluated. The majority of the articles published from 2013 to 2017 reported that the use of regional anesthesia minimized postoperative pain and reduced opioid consumption. Only a few surgical procedures (cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia repair, and non-laparoscopic major abdominal surgery) reported no significant difference in the postoperative pain relief compared with the standard anesthetic management. The growing number of randomized controlled trials in the pediatric literature is very promising; however, additional confirmation is needed to reinforce the use of specific regional anesthesia techniques to provide optimal postoperative pain relief for a few surgical procedures (reconstructive ear surgery, chest wall deformity, hypospadias, umbilical hernia, cleft palate repair) in pediatric patients. More randomized controlled trials are needed to establish regional anesthesia as an essential component of postoperative analgesia management in children.

Non-invasive cardiac output measurement with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing liver transplantation: comparison of an invasive method with pulmonary thermodilution

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and interchangeability between continuous cardiac output (CO) measured by electrical velocimetry (CO_Ev) and continuous cardiac output obtained using the pulmonary thermodilution method (CO_PAC) during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

METHOD

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. CO was recorded by both two methods and compared at nine specific time points. The data were analyzed using correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman analysis for the percentage errors, and the concordance rate for trend analysis using a four-quadrant plot.

RESULTS

In total, 207 paired datasets were recorded during LDLT. CO data were in the range of 2.8-12.7 L/min measured by PAC and 3.4-14.9 L/min derived from the EV machine. The correction coefficient between CO_PAC and CO_Ev was 0.415 with p < 0.01. The 95% limitation agreement was - 5.9 to 3.4 L/min and the percentage error was 60%. The concordance rate was 56.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Aesculon™ monitor is not yet interchangeable with continuous thermodilution CO monitoring during LDLT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Medical Foundation in Taiwan (registration number: 201600264B0 ).

Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output in children with repaired coarctation of the aorta using electrical cardiometry compared to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the equivalence of the ICON^® electrical cardiometry (EC) haemodynamic monitor to measure cardiac output (CO) relative to transthoracic Doppler echocardiography (TTE) in paediatric patients with repaired coarctation of the aorta (CoA).

APPROACH

A group of n  =  28 CoA patients and n  =  27 matched controls were enrolled. EC and TTE were performed synchronously on each participant and CO measurements compared using linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis. The CoA group was further subdivided into two groups, with n  =  10 and without n  =  18 increased left ventricular outflow tract velocity (iLVOTv) for comparison.

MAIN RESULTS

CO measurements from EC and TTE in controls showed a strong correlation (R  =  0.80, p  <  0.001) and an acceptable percentage error (PE) of 28.1%. However, combining CoA and control groups revealed a moderate correlation (R  =  0.57, p  <  0.001) and a poor PE (44.2%). We suspected that the CO in a subset of CoA participants with iLVOTv was overestimated by TTE. Excluding the iLVOTv CoA participants improved the correlation (R  =  0.77, p  <  0.001) and resulted in an acceptable PE of 31.2%.

SIGNIFICANCE

CO measurements in paediatric CoA patients in the absence of iLVOTv are clinically equivalent between EC and TTE. The presence of iLVOTv may impact the accuracy of CO measurement by TTE, but not EC.