Pattern of Ascending Aortic Dimensions Predicts the Growth Rate of the Aorta in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Management of bicuspid aortic valve disease in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation era

In an era of rapidly expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the management of patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disease is far less well established than in those with trileaflet anatomy. Results of isolated surgical aortic valve replacement are excellent in suitable patients, and surgery also allows treatment of concomitant pathology of the aortic root and ascending aorta that is frequently encountered in this cohort. Conversely, TAVI provides an excellent alternative in older patients who may be unsuitable for surgery, although outcomes in BAV disease have only been reported in relatively small non-randomised series. Here, we discuss the pertinent literature on this topic and outline contemporary interventional treatment options in this challenging setting.

Effect of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in reducing the aortic growth rate in children with bicuspid aortic valve-related aortopathy

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers and angiotensin receptor blockers in reducing the aortic growth rate in children with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-related aortopathy and ascending phenotype.

METHODS

Consecutive paediatric patients (≤16 years) with BAV and ascending aorta (AsAo) dilation (z-score > 3) were enrolled in this observational retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving prophylactic treatment with either atenolol (0.5 to 1.0 mg/kg/daily) or losartan (0.7 to 1.4 mg/kg/daily) were compared with those who did not receive medical prophylaxis (control group). The primary outcome of interest was the annual rate of change in maximal AsAo diameter z-score in the treatment and control groups.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 1005 patients, 120 (mean age 11.3 ± 4.5 years, 82% males) fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Patients in the treatment and control group had similar age, sex, family history of BAV, BAV morphology, and baseline AsAo diameter. During a median follow-up of 7.1 years (interquartile range 3.8-10.2), no differences were observed in the annual growth rate of aortic diameter z-score between patients on treatment and controls. The prevalence of aortic diameter progression was similar in the treatment and control groups, and treatment with atenolol or losartan was not associated with a lower rate of aortic disease progression.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings revealed no significant difference in the annual aortic growth rate between treated and untreated patients. Larger cohort studies or, ideally, randomized clinical controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Regional Aortic Wall Shear Stress Increases over Time in Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve

BACKGROUND

Aortic wall shear stress (WSS) is a known predictor of ascending aortic growth in patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). The aim of this study was to study regional WSS and changes over time in BAV patients.

METHODS

BAV patients and age-matched healthy controls underwent 4D flow CMR. Regional, peak systolic ascending aortic WSS, aortic valve function, aortic stiffness measures and aortic dimensions were assessed. In BAV patients, 4D flow CMR was repeated after three years follow-up and both at baseline and follow-up computed tomography angiography (CTA) was acquired. Aortic growth (volume increase of ≥5%) was measured on CTA. Regional WSS differences within patients' aorta and WSS changes over time were analysed using linear mixed-effect models and were associated with clinical parameters.

RESULTS

Thirty BAV patients (aged 34 years [IQR 25-41]) were included in the follow-up analysis. Additionally, another 16 BAV patients and 32 healthy controls (aged 33 years [IQR 28-48]) were included for other regional analyses. Magnitude, axial, and circumferential WSS increased over time (all p<0.001) irrespective of aortic growth. The percentage of regions exposed to a magnitude WSS >95th percentile of healthy controls increased from 21% (baseline 506/2400 regions) to 31% (follow-up 734/2400 regions) (p<0.001). WSS angle, a measure of helicity near the aortic wall, decreased during follow-up. Magnitude WSS changes over time were associated with systolic blood pressure, peak aortic valve velocity, aortic valve regurgitation fraction, aortic stiffness indexes, and normalized flow displacement (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

An increase of regional WSS over time was observed in BAV patients, irrespective of aortic growth. The increasing WSSs comprising a larger area of the aorta warrants further research to investigate the possible predictive value for aortic dissection.

Aortic Regurgitation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve: The Role of Multimodality Imaging

The evaluation of aortic regurgitation (AR) in bicuspid valve (BAV) is still a challenge because of the eccentricity of the jet, which may under/overestimate the regurgitation. The commonly used echocardiography parameters (such as vena contracta, pressure half-time, etc.) may not be useful in this kind of patient. A multimodality approach combining echocardiography, cardiac MRI, cardiac CT, and advanced technologies applied to non-invasive cardiac imaging (e.g., 4D flow and strain imaging) may be useful to better quantify regurgitation and to select patients suitable for valve replacement. This review provides an overview of the most recent insights about cardiovascular imaging tools and their utility in BAV evaluation, focusing on chronic regurgitation. We describe the role of multimodality imaging in both diagnosis and risk assessment of this disease, pointing out the advantages and disadvantages of the imaging techniques, aiming to provide a guide to clinicians and cardiovascular imaging specialists in choosing the best imaging tools to use.

Patients with a Bicuspid Aortic Valve (BAV) Diagnosed with ECG-Gated Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography-Analysis of the Reasons for Referral, Classification of Morphological Phenotypes, Co-Occurring Cardiovascular Abnormalities, and Coronary Artery Stenosis

Background/Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze a group of patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) examined with ECG-gated cardiac CT (ECG-CT), focusing on the assessment of the clinical reasons for cardiac CT, cardiovascular abnormalities coexisting with their BAV, and coronary artery stenosis. Methods: A detailed statistical analysis was conducted on 700 patients with a BAV from a group of 15,670 patients examined with ECG-CT. Results: The incidence of a BAV in ECG-CT was 4.6%. The most common reason for examination was suspicion of coronary heart disease-31.1%. Cardiovascular defects most frequently associated with a BAV were a VSD (4.3%) and coarctation of the aorta (3.6%), while among coronary anomalies, they were high-take-off coronary arteries (6.4%) and paracommissural orifice of coronary arteries (4.4%). The analysis of the coronary artery calcium index showed significantly lower values for type 2 BAV compared to other valve types (p < 0.001), with the lowest average age in this group of patients. Moreover, the presence of a raphe between the coronary and non-coronary cusps was associated with a higher rate of significant coronary stenosis compared to other types of BAVs (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The most common reason for referral for cardiac ECG-CT in the group ≤ 40-year-olds with a BAV was the suspicion of congenital cardiovascular defects, while in the group of over 40-year-olds, it was the suspicion of coronary artery disease. The incidence of cardiovascular abnormalities co-occurring with BAV and diagnosed with ECG-CT differs among specific patient subgroups. The presence of a raphe between the coronary and non-coronary cusps appears to be a potential risk factor for significant coronary stenosis in patients with BAVs.

miR-130a expression is related to aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve children

BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve disease (BAV) is present in 0.5-2% of the population and can promote aortic dilation, eventually leading to fatal consequences. Although some biomarkers have been proposed in adults, no studies have tested these candidates in children. We aimed to evaluate four miRNAs previously described to be related to BAV disease and aortic dilation in adults in a paediatric cohort.

METHODS

Eighty participants ≤17 years old (4-17; mean 12) were included. From the BAV group, 40% had a dilated aorta (z score >2). RT‒qPCR were performed in plasma samples to quantify miR-122, miR-130a, miR-486, and miR-718 using the delta-delta Ct method. Functional and enrichment analyses of miR-130a were also performed.

RESULTS

miR-130a expression in plasma was found to be significantly lower in BAV patients with a dilated aorta versus nondilated patients (p = 0.008) and healthy TAV controls (p = 0.004). Furthermore, miR-130a expression in plasma was inversely correlated with ascending aorta (r = 0.318, p = 0.004) and aortic root z scores (r = 0.322; p = 0.004). Enrichment analysis showed that miR-130a target genes are related to the TGFβ signalling pathway.

CONCLUSIONS

miR-130a expression in plasma is decreased in aortic-dilated BAV children compared to nondilated BAV children, helping differentiate low- to high-risk patients.

IMPACT

miR-130a expression in plasma is related to aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) children. To our knowledge, this is the first study that analyses miRNA patterns in bicuspid aortic valve children with aortic dilation. miR-130a expression in plasma could be a biomarker in order to help differentiate low-to high-risk BAV children, which is vitally important for advanced care planning.

Age is superior to aortopathy phenotype as a predictor of aortic mechanics in patients with bicuspid valve

OBJECTIVES

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortopathy is defined by 3 phenotypes-root, ascending, and diffuse-based on region of maximal aortic dilation. We sought to determine the association between aortic mechanical behavior and aortopathy phenotype versus other clinical variables.

METHODS

From August 1, 2016, to March 1, 2023, 375 aortic specimens were collected from 105 patients undergoing elective ascending aortic aneurysm repair for BAV aortopathy. Planar biaxial data (191 specimens) informed constitutive descriptors of the arterial wall that were combined with in vivo geometry and hemodynamics to predict stiffness, stress, and energy density under physiologic loads. Uniaxial testing (184 specimens) evaluated failure stretch and failure Cauchy stress. Boosting regression was implemented to model the association between clinical variables and mechanical metrics.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mechanical metrics between the root phenotype (N = 33, 31%) and ascending/diffuse phenotypes (N = 72, 69%). Biaxial testing demonstrated older age was associated with increased circumferential stiffness, decreased stress, and decreased energy density. On uniaxial testing, longitudinally versus circumferentially oriented specimens failed at significantly lower Cauchy stress (50th [15th, 85th percentiles]: 1.0 [0.7, 1.6] MPa vs 1.9 [1.3, 3.1] MPa; P < .001). Age was associated with decreased failure stretch and stress. Elongated ascending aortas were also associated with decreased failure stress.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic mechanical function under physiologic and failure conditions in BAV aortopathy is robustly associated with age and poorly associated with aortopathy phenotype. Data suggesting that the root phenotype of BAV aortopathy portends worse outcomes are unlikely to be related to aberrant, phenotype-specific tissue mechanics.

Characteristics and outcomes of the Spanish registry for pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve (REVAB)

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) disorder is the most common congenital heart disease. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of 0- to 18-year olds with BAV in a population-based registry.

METHODS

Data from all pediatric patients were obtained from the Spanish registry for pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve (REVAB) (< 18 years). For data analysis, patients with BAV were divided into 2 groups by their features: isolated BAV and BAV with associated congenital heart disease.

RESULTS

We included 1681 patients from 33 hospitals. Males accounted for 69.6% (n = 1158). Valve morphology was horizontal in 63.4% (n = 1012) and pure (Sievers type 0) in 28.4% (n=469). Isolated BAV was present in 63.7% (n=1060), and concomitant left-sided obstructive lesions in 23.4% (n=390). Interventions were required in 8.6% (n=145).

CONCLUSION

These data represent the first large, population-based description of the clinical presentations and outcomes of patients enrolled in the Spanish registry for pediatric patients with bicuspid aortic valve.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Mechanisms of Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Bicuspid aortic valve is the most common congenital heart disease and exposes patients to an increased risk of aortic dilation and dissection. Aortic dilation is a slow, silent process, leading to a greater risk of aortic dissection. The prevention of adverse events together with optimization of the frequency of the required lifelong imaging surveillance are important for both clinicians and patients and motivated extensive research to shed light on the physiopathologic processes involved in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy. Two main research hypotheses have been consolidated in the last decade: one supports a genetic basis for the increased prevalence of dilation, in particular for the aortic root, and the second supports the damaging impact on the aortic wall of altered flow dynamics associated with these structurally abnormal valves, particularly significant in the ascending aorta. Current opinion tends to rule out mutually excluding causative mechanisms, recognizing both as important and potentially clinically relevant.

Pregnancy-related aortic complications in women with bicuspid aortic valve

OBJECTIVES

To describe the aortic-related risks associated with pregnancy in women with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and to evaluate changes in aortic diameter in pregnancy.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of patients with BAV from a single-site registry of pregnant women with structural heart disease between 2013 and 2020. Cardiac, obstetric and neonatal outcomes were studied. An assessment of aortic dimensions was performed during pregnancy by two-dimensional echocardiography. Aortic diameters were measured at the annulus, root, sinotubular junction and maximum ascending aorta diameter, and the largest diameter was used. Measurements of the aorta were made using the end-diastolic leading edge-to-leading edge convention.

RESULTS

Forty-three women (32.9 years, IQR 29.6-35.3) with BAV were included: 9 (20.9%) had repaired aortic coarctation; 23 (53.5%) had moderate or severe aortic valve disease; 5 (11.6%) had a bioprosthetic aortic valve; and 2 (4.7%) had a mechanical prosthetic aortic valve. Twenty (47.0%) were nulliparous. The mean aortic diameter in the first trimester was 38.5 (SD 4.9) mm, and that in the third trimester was 38.4 (SD 4.8) mm. Forty (93.0%) women had an aortic diameter of <45 mm; 3 (7.0%) had 45-50 mm; and none had >50 mm. Three women (6.9%) with BAV presented cardiovascular complications during pregnancy or the postpartum period (two prosthetic thrombosis and one heart failure). No aortic complications were reported. There was a small but significant increase in aortic diameter during pregnancy (third trimester vs first trimester, 0.52 (SD 1.08) mm; p=0.03). Obstetric complications appeared in seven (16.3%) of pregnancies, and there were no maternal deaths. Vaginal non-instrumental delivery was performed in 21 (51.2%) out of 41 cases. There were no neonatal deaths, and the mean newborn weight was 3130 g (95% CI 2652 to 3380).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy in BAV women had a low rate of cardiac complications with no aortic complications observed in a small study group. Neither aortic dissection nor need for aortic surgery was reported. A low but significant aortic growth was observed during pregnancy. Although requiring follow-up, the risk of aortic complications in pregnant women with BAV and aortic diameters of <45 mm at baseline is low.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Anatomical and Clinical Factors Associated With Valvulopathy and Aortopathy in Mexican Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with significant aortic valve dysfunction. We aimed to study Mexican patients with BAV to assess phenotypic expressions of BAV, and associations of valvulopathy and aortopathy and their predictors. A cross-sectional, retrospective study was designed. The patients were divided according to (1) normally or minimally dysfunctional BAV, (2) predominant aortic regurgitation (AR), and (3) predominant aortic stenosis (AS). A total of 189 patients were included with a high prevalence of males (68%). The overall median age was 42 (23 to 52) years. The distribution of fused BAV phenotypes was right-left fusion (77%), right noncoronary fusion (17%) and left noncoronary fusion (6%). AS-predominant group was the oldest with a high prevalence of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and raphe. In multivariable analysis T2DM (odds ratio [OR] 10.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1 to 52], p <0.01) and presence of raphe (OR 2.58 [95% CI 1.02 to 6.52], p = 0.04) were independently associated with AS. The AR-predominant group was composed mostly of males with significantly fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Male gender (OR 2.84 [95%CI 121 to 6.68], p = 0.01) and aortic dilatation (OR 3.58 [95% CI 1.73 to 7.39], p <0.01) were associated with AR-predominance in multivariable analysis. Aortic dilatation was associated with age (OR 1.03 [95% CI 1.008 to 1.05], p <0.01) and AR (OR 4.31 [95% CI 2.05 to 9.06], p <0.01). Independent factors associated with the root phenotype were male gender (OR 12.4 [95% CI 1.6 to 95], p <0.01) and AR (OR 5.25 [95% CI 2.18 to 12.6], p <0.01).In conclusion, in a mestizo population, the distribution of BAV-fused phenotypes was similar to European and North American populations, the presence of raphe and T2DM were independently associated with AS-predominance, and male gender and aortic dilatation were independently associated with AR-predominance.

Clinical implications of the biomechanics of bicuspid aortic valve and bicuspid aortopathy

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), which affects up to 2% of the general population, results from the abnormal fusion of the cusps of the aortic valve. Patients with BAV are at a higher risk for developing aortic dilatation, a condition known as bicuspid aortopathy, which is associated with potentially life-threatening sequelae such as aortic dissection and aortic rupture. Although BAV biomechanics have been shown to contribute to aortopathy, their precise impact is yet to be delineated. Herein, we present the latest literature related to BAV biomechanics. We present the most recent definitions and classifications for BAV. We also summarize the current evidence pertaining to the mechanisms that drive bicuspid aortopathy. We highlight how aberrant flow patterns can contribute to the development of aortic dilatation. Finally, we discuss the role cardiac magnetic resonance imaging can have in assessing and managing patient with BAV and bicuspid aortopathy.

Bicuspid Aortic Valves: an Up-to-Date Review on Genetics, Natural History, and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality. It has a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations including aortic regurgitation (AR), aortic stenosis, and an associated aortopathy with a small but increased risk of aortic dissection. This review describes current knowledge of BAV, from anatomy and genetics to a discussion of multifaceted strategies utilized in the management of this unique patient population. This review will also highlight critical knowledge gaps in areas of basic and clinical research to enhance further understanding of this clinical entity.

RECENT FINDINGS

The current knowledge regarding pathophysiologic mechanisms, screening, and surveillance guidelines for BAV and the associated aortopathy is discussed. We also discuss current management techniques for aortic valve repair versus replacement, indications for aortic surgery (root or ascending aorta), and the emergence of the Ross procedure as a viable management option not only in children, but also in adolescents and adults. The varied clinical phenotype of the BAV, resulting in its specific complex hemodynamic interactions, renders it an entity which is separate and distinct from the tricuspid aortic valve pathologies. While various aortic histopathologic and protein alterations in BAV patients have been described, it remains unclear if these changes are causal or the result of hemodynamic alterations imposed by sheer stress on the intrinsically dysfunctional BAV. Medical management for patients with BAV with AS, AI, or dilated aortic roots/ascending aortas remains challenging and needs further investigation. More than 50% of patients with BAV will undergo AVR during their lifetime, and more than 25% of patients with BAV undergo aortic surgery performed for dilation of the aortic root or ascending aorta, often concurrently with AVR. The search for the ultimate genetic or epigenetic cause of the different bicuspid phenotypes will ultimately be facilitated by the next-generation sequencing tools that allow for study of large populations at low cost. Improvements in diagnostic and stratification criteria to accurately risk assess BAV patients are critical to this process.

Location of Aortic Enlargement and Risk of Type A Dissection at Smaller Diameters

BACKGROUND

Previous work has demonstrated that more than one-half of acute type A aortic dissections (ATADs) occur at a maximal aortic diameter (MAD) of <5.5 cm. However, no analysis has investigated whether ATAD risk at smaller MADs is more common with modest dilation of the aortic root (AR) or supracoronary ascending aorta (AA) in patients without genetically triggered aortopathy.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine if the segment of modest aortic dilation affects risk of ATAD.

METHODS

Using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) database from May 1996 to October 2016, we identified 667 ATAD patients with MAD <5.5 cm. Patients were stratified by location of the largest proximal aortic segment (AR or AA). Patients with known genetically triggered aortopathy were excluded. MADs at time of dissection were compared between AR and AA groups. Secondary outcomes included operation, postoperative outcomes, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

Of patients with ATAD at an MAD <5.5 cm, 79.5% (n = 530) were in the AA group and 20.5% (n = 137) in the AR group. Modestly dilated ARs (median MAD 4.6 cm [IQR: 4.1-5.0 cm]) dissected at a significantly smaller diameter than modestly dilated AAs (median MAD 4.8 cm [IQR: 4.4-5.1 cm]) (P < 0.01). AR patients were significantly younger than AA patients (58.5 ± 13.0 years vs 63.2 ± 13.3 years; P < 0.01) and more commonly male (78% vs 65%; P < 0.01). Postoperative and long-term outcomes did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ATAD appears to occur at smaller diameters in patients with modest dilation in the AR vs the AA (4.6 vs 4.8 cm). These findings may have implications for future consensus guidelines regarding the management of patients with aortic disease.

Unraveling Bicuspid Aortic Valve Enigmas by Multimodality Imaging: Clinical Implications

Multimodality imaging is the basis of the diagnosis, follow-up, and surgical management of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is used in our clinical routine practice as a first line imaging for BAV diagnosis, valvular phenotyping and function, measurement of thoracic aorta, exclusion of other aortic malformations, and for the assessment of complications such are infective endocarditis and aortic. Nevertheless, TTE is less useful if we want to assess accurately other aortic segments such as mid-distal ascending aorta, where computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (CMR) could improve the precision of aorta size measurement by multiplanar reconstructions. A major advantage of CT is its superior spatial resolution, which affords a better definition of valve morphology and calcification, accuracy, and reproducibility of ascending aorta size, and allows for coronary artery assessment. Moreover, CMR offers the opportunity of being able to evaluate aortic functional properties and blood flow patterns. In this setting, new developed sequences such as 4D-flow may provide new parameters to predict events during follow up. The integration of all multimodality information facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of morphologic and dynamic features, stratification of the risk, and therapy guidance of this cohort of patients.

Is Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology Genetically Determined? A Family-Based Study

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart disease, with a 10-fold higher prevalence in first-degree relatives. BAV has different phenotypes based on the morphology of cusp fusion. These phenotypes are associated with different clinical courses and prognoses. Currently, the determinants of the valve phenotype are unknown. In this study we evaluated the role of genetics using familial cohorts. Patients with BAV and their first-degree relatives were evaluated by echocardiography. The concordance in BAV phenotype between pairs of family members was calculated and compared with the concordance expected by chance. We then performed a systematic literature review to identify additional reports and calculated the overall concordance rate. During the study period, 70 cases from 31 families and 327 sporadic cases were identified. BAV was diagnosed in 14% of the screened relatives. The proportions of the morphologies identified was: 12.3% for type 0, 66.2% for type 1-LR, 15.4% for type 1-RN, 4.6% for type 1-NL, and 1.5% for type 2. For the assessment of morphologic concordance, we included 120 pairs of first-degree relatives with BAV from our original cohort and the literature review. Concordance was found only in 62% of the pairs which was not significantly higher than expected by chance. In conclusion, our finding demonstrates intrafamilial variability in BAV morphology, suggesting that morphology is determined by factors other than Mendelian genetics. As prognosis differs by morphology, our findings may suggest that clinical outcomes may vary even between first-degree relatives.

Central Hypertension in Patients With Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms: Prevalence and Association With Aneurysm Size and Growth

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HTN) has the greatest population-attributable risk for aortic dissection and is highly prevalent among patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs). Although HTN is diagnosed based on brachial blood pressure (bBP), central HTN (central systolic blood pressure [cSBP] ≥130 mm Hg) is of interest as it better reflects blood pressure (BP) in the aorta. We aimed to (i) evaluate the prevalence of central HTN among TAA patients without a diagnosis of HTN, and (ii) assess associations of bBP vs. central blood pressure (cBP) with aneurysm size and growth.

METHODS

One hundred and five unoperated subjects with TAAs were recruited. With validated methodology, cBP was assessed with applanation tonometry. Aneurysm size was assessed at baseline and follow-up using imaging modalities. Aneurysm growth rate was calculated in mm/year. Multivariable linear regression adjusted for potential confounders assessed associations of bBP and cBP with aneurysm size and growth.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven percent of participants were men and 49% carried a diagnosis of HTN. Among participants without diagnosis of HTN, 15% had central HTN despite normal bBP ("occult central HTN"). In these patients, higher central systolic BP (cSBP) and central pulse pressure (cPP) were independently associated with larger aneurysm size (β ± SE = 0.28 ± 0.11, P = 0.014 and cPP = 0.30 ± 0.11, P = 0.010, respectively) and future aneurysm growth (β ± SE = 0.022 ± 0.008, P = 0.013 and 0.024 ± 0.009, P = 0.008, respectively) while bBP was not (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with TAAs without a diagnosis of HTN, central HTN is prevalent, and higher cBP is associated with larger aneurysms and faster aneurysm growth.

Association of Regional Wall Shear Stress and Progressive Ascending Aorta Dilation in Bicuspid Aortic Valve

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of wall shear stress (WSS) as a predictor of ascending aorta (AAo) growth at 5 years or greater follow-up.

BACKGROUND

Aortic 4-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can quantify regions exposed to high WSS, a known stimulus for arterial wall dysfunction. However, its association with longitudinal changes in aortic dilation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective study identified 72 patients with BAV (age 45 ± 12 years) who underwent CMR for surveillance of aortic dilation at baseline and ≥5 years of follow-up. Four-dimensional flow CMR analysis included the calculation of WSS heat maps to compare regional WSS in individual patients with population averages of healthy age- and sex-matched subjects (database of 136 controls). The relative areas of the AAo and aorta (in %) exposed to elevated WSS (outside the 95% CI of healthy population averages) were quantified.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up duration of 6.0 years, the mean AAo growth rate was 0.24 ± 0.20 mm/y. The fraction of the AAo exposed to elevated WSS at baseline was increased for patients with higher growth rates (>0.24 mm/y, n = 32) compared with those with growth rates <0.24 mm/y (19.9% [IQR: 10.2%-25.5%] vs 5.7% [IQR: 1.5%-21.3%]; P = 0.008). Larger areas of elevated WSS in the AAo and entire aorta were associated with higher rates of AAo dilation >0.24 mm/y (odds ratio: 1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.17; P = 0.026 and odds ratio: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.01-3.15; P = 0.046, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The area of elevated AAo WSS as assessed by 4-dimensional flow CMR identified BAV patients with higher rates of aortic dilation and thus might determine which patients require closer follow-up.

Aortic Root Anatomy Is Related to the Bicuspid Aortic Valve Phenotype

BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is associated with an asymmetric (not circular) aortic root, resulting in variability in the aortic root diameter measurements obtained using different techniques. The objective of this study was to describe aortic root asymmetry, including its orientation in the thorax, in relation to the various phenotypes of BAV and its impact on aortic root diameter measurements obtained using transthoracic echocardiography.

METHODS

Aortic root asymmetry, orientation of the largest root diameter, and orientation of the valve opening were studied using computed tomographic scans of patients with BAV without significant aortic valve dysfunction referred for evaluation of a thoracic aortic aneurysm. Eighty-five patients with BAV were evaluated; BAV with fusion of the left and the right coronary cusps (L-R BAV), with or without raphe (n = 63), was compared with BAV with fusion of the right coronary and noncoronary cusps (N-R BAV), with or without raphe (n = 22).

RESULTS

Asymmetry of the aortic root and its orientation in the thorax can be predicted from BAV phenotype: orientation of the valve opening differed from orientation of the largest root diameter by nearly 75° in both groups. The angle of the largest root diameter with the reference sagittal plane was 64.3° in the L-R BAV group versus 143.1° in the N-R BAV group (P < .0001). Therefore, using the parasternal long-axis view on transthoracic echocardiography, in N-R BAV, the ultrasound beam is roughly parallel to the valve opening orientation and almost orthogonal to the maximum diameter of the root. On the contrary, in L-R BAV, the ultrasound beam is roughly perpendicular to the valve opening orientation and almost parallel to the maximum diameter of the root. Consequently, the parasternal long-axis view on transthoracic echocardiography significantly underestimates maximal aortic root diameter in N-R BAV and modestly underestimates root diameter in L-R BAV (-6.1 ± 0.96 vs -2.3 ± 0.47 mm, P = .0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root morphology in patients with BAV can be predicted by BAV phenotype: the largest root diameter is roughly perpendicular to the orientation of the valve opening. Therefore, echocardiographic measurements according to present recommendations (parasternal long-axis view) underestimate maximal diameter in patients with N-R BAV.

Predictors of Ascending Aorta Enlargement and Valvular Dysfunction Progression in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are at high risk of developing progressive aortic valve dysfunction and ascending aorta dilation. However, the progression of the disease is not well defined. We aimed to assess mid-long-term aorta dilation and valve dysfunction progression and their predictors. Patients were referred from cardiac outpatient clinics to the echocardiographic laboratories of 10 tertiary hospitals and followed clinically and by echocardiography for >5 years. Seven hundred and eighteen patients with BAV (median age 47.8 years [IQR 33-62], 69.2% male) were recruited. BAV without raphe was observed in 11.3%. After a median follow-up of 7.2 years [IQR5-8], mean aortic root growth rate was 0.23 ± 0.15 mm/year. On multivariate analysis, rapid aortic root dilation (>0.35 mm/year) was associated with male sex, hypertension, presence of raphe and aortic regurgitation. Annual ascending aorta growth rate was 0.43 ± 0.32 mm/year. Rapid ascending aorta dilation was related only to hypertension. Variables associated with aortic stenosis and regurgitation progression, adjusted by follow-up time, were presence of raphe, hypertension and dyslipidemia and basal valvular dysfunction, respectively. Intrinsic BAV characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors were associated with aorta dilation and valvular dysfunction progression, taking into account the inherent limitations of our study-design. Strict and early control of cardiovascular risk factors is mandatory in BAV patients.

Wall Shear Stress Predicts Aortic Dilation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the predictive value of wall shear stress (WSS) for colocalized ascending aorta (AAo) growth rate (GR) in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV).

BACKGROUND

BAV is associated with AAo dilation, but there is limited knowledge about possible predictors of aortic dilation in BAV patients with BAV. An increased WSS has been related to aortic wall damage in patients with BAV, but no previous prospective study tested its predictive value for dilation rate. Recently, a registration-based technique for the semiautomatic mapping of aortic GR has been presented and validated.

METHODS

Forty-seven patients with BAV free from valvular dysfunction prospectively underwent 4-dimensional flow cardiac magnetic resonance to compute WSS and subsequent follow-up with 2 electrocardiogram-gated high-resolution contrast-enhanced computed tomography angiograms for GR assessment.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up duration of 43 months, mid AAo GR was 0.24 mm/year. WSS and its circumferential component showed statistically significant association with mid AAo GR in bivariate (P = 0.049 and P = 0.014, respectively) and in multivariate analysis corrected for stroke volume and either baseline AAo diameter (P = 0.046 and P = 0.014, respectively) or z-score (P = 0.036 and P = 0.012, respectively). GR mapping further detailed that GR was heterogeneous in the AAo and that circumferential WSS, but not WSS magnitude, showed statistically significant positive associations with GR in the regions with the fastest growth.

CONCLUSIONS

4D flow cardiac magnetic resonance-derived WSS and, in particular, its circumferential component predict progressive dilation of the ascending aorta in patients with BAV. Thus, the assessment of WSS may be considered in the follow-up of these patients.

International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes. ©  2021 Jointly between the RSNA, the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. All rights reserved. Keywords: Bicuspid Aortic Valve, Aortopathy, Nomenclature, Classification.

Aortic root aortopathy in bicuspid aortic valve associated with high genetic risk

Background

The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is prone to ascending aortic dilatation (AAD) involving both the tubular segment and the aortic root. The genetic factor was proposed as one of the most important mechanisms for AAD. We hypothesized that the rare genetic variants mainly contribute to the pathogenesis of aortic roots in affected individuals.

Methods

The diameter of aortic root or ascending aorta ≥ 40 mm was counted as AAD. The targeted next-generation sequencing of 13 BAV-associated genes were performed on a continuous cohort of 96 unrelated BAV patients. The rare variants with allele frequency < 0.05% were selected and analyzed. Variants frequency was compared against the Exome aggregation consortium database. The pathogenicity of the genetic variants was evaluated according to the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines.

Results

A total of 27 rare nonsynonymous coding variants involving 9 genes were identified in 25 individuals. The burden analysis revealed that variants in GATA5, GATA6, and NOTCH1 were significantly associated with BAV. Eighty percent of the pathogenic variants were detected in root group. The detection rate of rare variants was higher in root dilatation group (71.4%) compared with normal aorta (29.0%) and tubular dilatation groups (29.6%) (P = 0.018). The rare variant was identified as the independent risk factor of root dilatation [P = 0.014, hazard ratio = 23.9, 95% confidence interval (1.9–302.9)].

Conclusions

Our results presented a broad genetic spectrum in BAV patients. The rare variants of BAV genes contribute the most to the root phenotype among BAV patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12872-021-02215-y.

Summary: international consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

Summary: International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional, and research purposes

This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

International consensus statement on nomenclature and classification of the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy, for clinical, surgical, interventional and research purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

Summary: International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

This International evidence-based nomenclature and classification consensus on the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy recognizes 3 types of bicuspid aortic valve: 1. Fused type, with 3 phenotypes: right-left cusp fusion, right-non cusp fusion and left-non cusp fusion; 2. 2-sinus type with 2 phenotypes: Latero-lateral and antero-posterior; and 3. Partial-fusion or forme fruste. This consensus recognizes 3 bicuspid-aortopathy types: 1. Ascending phenotype; root phenotype; and 3. extended phenotypes.

International Consensus Statement on Nomenclature and Classification of the Congenital Bicuspid Aortic Valve and Its Aortopathy, for Clinical, Surgical, Interventional and Research Purposes

This International Consensus Classification and Nomenclature for the congenital bicuspid aortic valve condition recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valves: 1. The fused type (right-left cusp fusion, right-non-coronary cusp fusion and left-non-coronary cusp fusion phenotypes); 2. The 2-sinus type (latero-lateral and antero-posterior phenotypes); and 3. The partial-fusion (forme fruste) type. The presence of raphe and the symmetry of the fused type phenotypes are critical aspects to describe. The International Consensus also recognizes 3 types of bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy: 1. The ascending phenotype; 2. The root phenotype; and 3. Extended phenotypes.

Aortic Dilatation in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality. BAV aortic dilatation is associated with an increased risk of adverse aortic events and represents a potentially lethal disease and hence a considerable medical burden. BAV with aortic dilatation warrants frequent monitoring, and elective surgical intervention is the only effective method to prevent dissection or rupture. The predictive value of the aortic diameter is known to be limited. The aortic diameter is presently still the main reference standard for surgical intervention owing to the lack of a comprehensive understanding of BAV aortopathy progression. This article provides a brief comprehensive review of the current knowledge on BAV aortopathy regarding clinical definitions, epidemiology, natural course, and pathophysiology, as well as hemodynamic and clinically significant aspects on the basis of the limited data available.

Residual root fate after aortic surgery in bicuspid aortic valve with right-to-left fusion: A comparative risk analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Although bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) anatomy might influence aortic aneurysm development, BAV-related root involvement still lacks standardized surgical management. We aimed to evaluate late clinical outcomes and risk factors for root dilation after proximal aortic replacement in patients with BAV and right-left fusion (RL-BAV).

METHODS

Clinical and echocardiographic data of all patients with intraoperative RL-BAV who underwent ascending aortic replacement with or without noncoronary sinus (NCS) replacement (Groups 1 and 2, respectively) between 1999 and 2017, were retrospectively revised. A multivariable analysis assessed hazard factors for root dilation during follow-up (FU).

RESULTS

Of 206 surgeries performed (M 81%; age: 57 ± 13 years, EuroSCORE II: 2.7 ± 1.9%), 79 (38%) required NCS replacement. One hundred fifty-seven patients (76%) underwent aortic valve replacement (with aortic regurgitation predominating in Group 1, p = .04). The preoperative aortic root was larger in patients requiring NCS replacement (43.3 ± 5.1 vs. 39.2 ± 4.8 mm, p < .001). At a median FU time of 7 years (interquartile range: 4-10), no residual root dissections occurred, and only two patients (belonging to Group 2) required redo root surgery. Preoperative mild aortic regurgitation and aortic root diameter >35 mm at discharge were risk factors for root dilation >40 mm at FU (p = .02). Aortic root did not dilate over time, irrespective of NCS replacement (p = .06).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root in patients with RL-BAV undergoing ascending aortic replacement (±NCS replacement) does not significantly dilate over time, even if patients with preoperative aortic regurgitation and postoperative root more than 35 mm might require more surveillance.

Relationship between indexed aortic area and aortic diameter in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection is a life-threatening complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV)-associated aortopathy. In these populations, whilst prophylactic replacement of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAAs) is generally recommended at threshold diameters ≥5.5 cm, dissection may occur in smaller aortas. An alternative size-based parameter, the cross-sectional aortic area/patient height ratio (indexed aortic area, IAA), correlates with increased dissection risk at abnormal values > 10 cm2/m. We sought to assess the utility of the IAA in identifying at-risk BAV-associated TAAs with abnormal IAA, albeit with sub-threshold aortic diameter.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 69 patients with BAV-associated TAAs who underwent surgical repair between 2010 and 2016. Aortic diameter was measured on pre-operative imaging, and IAA calculated, at the mid-sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta for each patient. We determined proportions of aneurysms with IAA >10 cm2/m, median IAAs corresponding to aortic diameters <4.0 cm, 4.0-4.5 cm, 4.5-5.0 cm, 5.0-5.5 cm and >5.5 cm, and median aortic diameters corresponding to an abnormal IAA.

RESULTS

50.9%, 12.5% and 64.6% of aneurysms at the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction and mid-ascending aorta, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. 51.9% and 88.9% of patients with aortic diameter 4.5-5.0 cm and 5.0-5.5 cm, respectively, had an abnormal IAA. In aneurysms with abnormal IAA involving the sinus of Valsalva, sino-tubular junction, and mid-ascending aorta, median aortic diameters were 4.98 cm, 5.04 cm and 5.11 cm, respectively. Overall, 57/72 (79.2%) at-risk aneurysms with IAA >10 cm2/m had diameters smaller than the 5.5 cm guideline cut-off for surgical intervention.

CONCLUSION

Significant proportions of BAV-associated TAAs are at increased risk of aortic dissection attending an IAA >10 cm2/m, whilst not fulfilling the size criteria indicating aortic surgery in contemporary guidelines. Further analysis of IAA in larger BAV cohorts is necessary to clarify its role in patient selection and optimal timing for prophylactic aortic replacement.

When should a rare inherited connective tissue disorder be suspected in bicuspid aortic valve by primary-care internists and cardiologists? Proposal of a score

Size threshold for aortic surgery in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is debated. Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) are claimed as a clinical turning point, suggesting early surgery in BAV patients with CTD. Thus, we aimed at developing a score to detect high risk of carrying CTDs in consecutive BAVs from primary care. Ninety-eight BAVs without ectopia lentis or personal/family history of aortic dissection were studied at the Marfan syndrome Tuscany Referral Center. Findings were compared with those detected in 84 Marfan patients matched for sex and age. We selected traits with high statistical difference between MFS and BAV easily obtainable by cardiologists and primary-care internists: mitral valve prolapse, myopia ≥ 3DO, pectus carenatum, pes planus, wrist and thumb signs, and difference between aortic size at root and ascending aorta ≥ 4 mm. Clustering of ≥ 3 of these manifestations were more frequent in Marfan patients than in BAVs (71.4% vs 6.1%, p < 0.0001) resulting into an Odds Ratio to be affected by MFS of 38.3 (95% confidence intervals 14.8-99.3, p < 0.0001). We propose a score assembling simple clinical and echocardiographic variables resulting in an appropriate referral pattern of BAVs from a primary-care setting to a tertiary center to evaluate the presence of a potential, major CTD.

Natural history and outcomes of non-replaced aortic sinuses in patients with bicuspid aortic valves

BACKGROUND

Enlargement of the sinus of Valsalva (SOV) is common in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), and management at the time of aortic valve replacement (AVR) and concomitant ascending aorta replacement/repair is controversial.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2017, 400 patients with BAV underwent AVR and concomitant ascending aorta repair (79%, graft replacement; 21%, aortoplasty). To assess the impact of the initial SOV dimension on future dilatation and outcomes, patients were stratified into two groups: SOV<40mm (n=209) and SOV≥40mm (n=191).

RESULTS

Patients with SOV≥40 mm were older, and more often male. At a median follow-up of 8.1 years (IQR 7.4-9.1), 6 patients underwent reoperations on the ascending or sinus portion of the aorta due to aneurysmal dilatation; enlargement of the sinus was the primary indication for operation in one patient. Adjusted analysis showed that baseline SOV and SOV dimension over time were not associated with late outcomes. A gradual increase in SOV diameter over time was identified (P=0.004). Patients with smaller baseline SOV diameters showed an initial early decrease in diameter followed by gradual increase, while those with larger baseline diameters had a stable early phase followed by gradual dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Ascending aorta replacement may lead to an initial remodeling/stabilizing effect on the spared bicuspid aortic root, which is more pronounced in patients with lower SOV diameters. In addition, our data demonstrate that the retained aortic sinuses enlarge slowly, and within the limited follow-up of our study, SOV diameter was not a risk factor for survival or reoperation.

Fate of mild-to-moderate bicuspid aortic valve disease untreated during ascending aorta replacement

BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect and it is responsible for an increased risk of developing aortic valve and ascending aorta complications. In case of mild to moderate BAV disease in patients undergoing supracoronary ascending aorta replacement, it is unclear whether a concomitant aortic valve replacement should be performed.

METHODS

From June 2002 to January 2020, 75 patients with mild-to-moderate BAV regurgitation (±mild-to-moderate stenosis) who underwent isolated supracoronary ascending aorta replacement were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was 100% complete (mean: 7.4 ± 3.9 years, max: 16.4). Kaplan-Meier estimates were employed to analyze long-term survival. Cumulative incidence function (CIF) for time to reoperation, recurrence of aortic regurgitation (AR) ≥3+ and aortic stenosis (AS) greater than moderate, with death as competing risk, were computed.

RESULTS

There was no hospital mortality and no cardiac death occurred. Overall survival at 12 years was 97.4 ± 2.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI: 83.16-99.63). At follow-up there were no cases of aortic root surgery whereas three patients underwent AV replacement. At 12 years the CIF of reoperation was 2.6 ± 2.5%, 95% CI [0.20-11.53]. At follow-up, AR 3+/4+ was present in 1 pt and AS greater than moderate in 3. At 12 years the CIF of AR more than 2+/4+ was 5.1 ± 4.98% and of AS more than moderate 6.9 ± 3.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study mild to moderate regurgitation of a BAV did not do significantly worse at least up to 10 years after isolated supracoronary ascending aorta replacement.

An interesting Mybpc3 heterozygous mutation associated with bicuspid aortic valve

BACKGROUND

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart defect (0.5-2.0% in the adult), potentially an onset factor of aortic stenosis (AS). Increasing evidence demonstrates that genetic risk factors play a key role in the pathogenesis of BAV, but the genetic basis underlying this cardiac malformation remains poorly understood.

METHODS

Whole exome sequencing (WES) was utilized to uncover genetic variants associated with BAV. Pathogenicity score and mode of inheritance through bioinformatics tools were undertook to identify the possible disease-causing mutation.

RESULTS

A heterozygous Ala58Val mutation in Myosin binding protein C (Mybpc3) was identified out of 2,840 variants in an 11-year-old female patient. The proband and her father were confirmed to be heterozygous carriers of 173 C>T hybridization, and her mother was homozygous negative of the mutation as confirmed through Sanger sequencing. Expression of mRNA in the proband and her father, who also carries the mutation, were almost half of proband's mother. Indicating Mybpc3 (p.Ala58Val) mutation affected its expression, and may play crucial roles for heritable BAV.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first time to report Mybpc3 heterozygous variant associated with heritable BAV. The relationship between the location of Mybpc3 mutation and BAV may provide a novel perspective of understanding this disorder.

Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Growth in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Patients: Role of Aortic Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics

Background

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital cardiac abnormality. A thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) is present in ≈50% of BAV patients, who also have an 8‐fold higher risk of aortic dissection than the general population. Because the health of the aorta is directly reflected in its stiffness and pulsatile hemodynamics, we hypothesized that measures of aortic stiffness and arterial load would be associated with TAA growth in BAV.

Methods and Results

Twenty‐nine unoperated participants with TAA due to BAV who had serial imaging were recruited. Aortic stiffness and steady and pulsatile arterial load were evaluated with validated methods that integrate arterial tonometry with echocardiography. TAA growth was assessed retrospectively based on available imaging, blinded to hemodynamic status. Multivariable linear regression assessed associations of aortic stiffness and hemodynamic variables with TAA growth, adjusting for potential confounders. Overall, 66% of participants were men. Mean±SD for age, baseline aneurysm size, growth rate, and follow‐up time were 57.2±8.3 years, 46.9±3.6 mm, 0.75±0.81 mm/y, and 2.9±3.3 years, respectively. We found that greater aortic stiffness (β±SE for carotid‐femoral pulse wave velocity: 0.30±0.13. P=0.03) and aortic characteristic impedance (β±SE: 0.46±0.18, P=0.02), as well as lower total arterial and proximal aortic compliance (β±SE: −0.44±0.21, P=0.05, and −0.63±0.16, P=0.001, respectively) were independently associated with faster aneurysm growth.

Conclusions

In patients with TAA due to BAV, measures of greater aortic stiffness and pulsatile arterial load indicate an association with accelerated aneurysm expansion. Assessing arterial hemodynamics may be useful for risk stratification and disease monitoring in TAA patients with BAV.

Surgical management of the aorta in BAV patients

Patients with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) frequently develop aneurysms of the aortic root and tubular ascending aorta. Aneurysms of the aortic arch, in the absence of concomitant aortopathies, are much less common. According to the 2018 American Association of Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on BAV-related aortopathy, prophylactic surgical aortic repair / replacement is recommended starting at a maximum aortic diameter of 50 mm in patients with risk factors. Concomitant aortic surgery is also recommended at an aortic diameter of 45 mm in those patients with other indications for cardiac surgery (most commonly aortic valve procedures). The ultimate goal of prophylactic aortic surgery is the prevention of aortic catastrophes, e.g. aortic rupture or acute aortic dissection, which are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The surgical technique used - in elective and emergency cases - depends on the involvement and nature of the aortic valve disease, as well as the extent of aortic aneurysm formation. The current review focusses on the surgical management of the aortic root, tubular ascending aorta, and proximal aortic arch in BAV patients. Despite the abovementioned recommendations, many BAV patients develop acute aortic syndromes below the recommended aortic diameter thresholds. Further research is therefore required in order to identify high-risk BAV subgroups that would benefit from earlier surgical repair.

Multimodality imaging in bicuspid aortic valve

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are at increased risk of valve dysfunction and ascending aorta aneurysm. Imaging techniques are essential to establish diagnosis, identify complications and indicate surgical treatment. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the imaging technique of choice to diagnose BAV, valve morphotype and valvular dysfunction in clinical practice. However, it can be less precise in assessing the aortic root and proximal ascending aorta, and visualization of the mid-distal ascending aorta and the arch may be difficult in some adults where cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and computed tomography, using multiplanar reconstructions, are better at assessing aortic diameters. Although valvular dysfunction is very variable, almost half of the patients have more than mild aortic valve disease. TTE is the most effective and accurate test for evaluating the severity of valvular dysfunction and guiding appropriate management decisions. Aorta dilation is a common finding in patients with BAV. The pattern of aortic dimensions has been categorized in three aortic phenotypes: no-dilation phenotype, ascending aorta phenotype and root phenotype. Controversial data exist regarding the relationship between BAV morphology and aorta dilation phenotype. The assessment of aortic stiffness (measuring distensibility or the velocity of propagation of flow) has raised special interest in order to predict progressive aorta dilation. However, current data indicates that BAV aortas do not show altered stiffness compared to those associated with a tricuspid valve with a similar aorta size. Moreover, novel 4D-flow CMR sequences have been crucial in the evaluation of abnormal ascending aorta flow, showing that flow in the aorta of BAV patients is asymmetric and includes the formation of large vortices. Such flow abnormalities are thought to produce changes in wall shear stress which has been associated with extracellular matrix dysregulation. The key points to understand familial screening and the recommendations for establishing the follow-up and therapeutic management of BAV patients are exposed in the review. The main objective of this article is to review the advantages and limitations of the imaging techniques in the diagnosis and management of BAV and the best strategies in the use of multimodality imaging.

Speaking a common language: Introduction to a standard terminology for the bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy

There is a growing need to develop a common language when referring to a frequent and heterogeneous condition such as the congenital bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy. The following short manuscript serves as an introduction to a standard terminology for the bicuspid aortic valve and its aortopathy.

The science of BAV aortopathy

The aortopathy associated with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is an epidemiologically relevant source of chronic and acute aortic disease (aneurysm and dissection). However, its pathogenesis is still the object of scientific uncertainties and debates. Indeed, the mechanisms determining the diseases of the ascending aorta in BAV patients are most likely complex and multifactorial, i.e. resulting from variable modes of interplay between genetic and hemodynamic factors. Although few scientific studies have so far taken into adequate account this complexity, leaving the precise sequence of pathogenetic events still undiscovered, the accumulated evidence from previous research approaches have at least brought about important insights. While genetic studies have so far identified variants relevant to either valve malformation or aortic complications (including those in the genes NOTCH1, TGFBR2, ACTA2, GATA5, NKX2.5, SMAD6, ROBO4), however each explaining not more than 5% of the study population, other investigations have thoroughly described both the flow features, with consequent forces acting on the arterial wall (including skewed flow jet direction, rotational flow, wall shear stress), and the main changes in the molecular and cellular wall structure (including extracellular matrix degradation, smooth muscle cell changes, oxidative stress, unbalance of TGF-β signaling, aberrant endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition). All of this evidence, together with the recognition of the diverse phenotypes that the aortopathy can assume in BAV patients, holding possible prognostic significance, is reviewed in this chapter. The complex and multifaceted body of knowledge resulting from clinical and basic science studies on BAV aortopathy has the potential to importantly influence modes of clinical management of this disease in the near future.

Applications of a Specialty Bicuspid Aortic Valve Program: Clinical Continuity and Translational Collaboration

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart diagnosis and is associated with aortopathy. Current guidelines for aortic resection have been validated but are based on aortic diameter, which is insufficient to predict acute aortic events. Clinical and translational collaboration is necessary to identify biomarkers that can individualize the timing of prophylactic surgery for BAV aortopathy. We describe our multidisciplinary BAV program, including research protocols aimed at biomarker discovery and results from our longitudinal clinical registry. From 2012–2018, 887 patients enrolled in our clinical BAV registry with the option to undergo four dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow CMR) and donate serum plasma or tissue samples. Of 887 patients, 388 (44%) had an elective BAV-related procedure after initial presentation, while 499 (56%) continued with medical management. Of medical patients, 44 (9%) had elective surgery after 2.3 ± 1.4 years. Surgery patients’ biobank donations include 198 (46%) aorta, 374 (86%) aortic valve, and 314 (73%) plasma samples. The 4D flow CMR was completed for 215 (50%) surgery patients and 243 (49%) medical patients. Patients with BAV aortopathy can be safely followed by a multidisciplinary team to detect indications for surgery. Paired tissue and hemodynamic analysis holds opportunity for biomarker development in BAV aortopathy.

Utilizing wall shear stress as a clinical biomarker for bicuspid valve-associated aortopathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) results from fusion of two adjacent aortic valve cusps, and is associated with dilatation of the aorta, known as BAV-associated aortopathy, or bicuspid aortopathy. Bicuspid aortopathy is progressive, increasing the risk of life-threatening clinical events, such as aortic dissection. Regular monitoring and timely intervention with prophylactic surgical resection of the proximal aorta is recommended.

RECENT FINDINGS

Aortopathy is heterogeneous among patients. Studies have shown that different flow patterns lead to specific phenotypes of aortopathy. Although not uniform, BAV morphology affects flow patterns. Recent work has demonstrated the role of wall shear stress (WSS) in driving aortopathy, and it is suggested that individualized WSS 'heat maps' can be used for clinically monitoring patients with BAV. WSS has the potential to be an imaging biomarker for directing resection timing, surgical strategies, and postsurgical follow-up care.

SUMMARY

Finding and validating noninvasive hemodynamic biomarkers of aortic risk to assist in the management of BAV patients is of clinical importance. Herein, we will review the latest findings pertaining to the utility of WSS as a specific biomarker of risk for BAV patients with aortopathy.

Clinical Significance of Aortic Root Modification Associated With Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Marfan Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Both bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and Marfan syndrome have been associated with aortic dissection risk, but it is unknown whether the presence of BAV is associated with an increased aortic risk in patients with an FBN1 gene mutation. We evaluated aortic diameters, aortic valve function, and aortic shape in Marfan syndrome patients with and without BAV and reported aortic events during follow-up.

METHODS

All patients with an FBN1 gene mutation evaluated in our clinic were included. Aortic root diameters were measured, and the aortic valve was studied using echocardiography at each visit.

RESULTS

Of the 1437 patients with an FBN1 gene mutation, 26 patients (1.8%) had a BAV. Both aortic root maximal diameter and normalized Z score were larger at all ages, in patients with BAV when compared with patients with tricuspid aortic valve. Prophylactic aortic root surgery tended to be performed in younger patients when BAV was present, although aortic diameter threshold was similar in the 2 populations. No aortic dissection was observed in Marfan syndrome patients with BAV.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a FBN1 mutation, BAV is associated with larger aortic root diameter, with no difference in evolution of Z score with age. We found a trend towards prophylactic aortic root surgery at younger ages but similar aortic diameter thresholds without occurrence of aortic dissection. We did not find any evidence for lowering aortic diameter thresholds used to propose preventive aortic root surgery in the presence of BAV in patients with FBN1 mutations.