Association of Tube Voltage With Plaque Composition on Coronary CT Angiography: Results From PARADIGM Registry

Characterizing Nonculprit Lesions and Perivascular Adipose Tissue of Patients Following Acute Myocardial Infarction Using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

The comparison of coronary computed tomography angiography plaques and perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) between patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) posttreatment and patients with stable coronary artery disease is poorly understood. Our objective was to evaluate the differences in coronary computed tomography angiography-quantified plaque and PVAT characteristics in patients post-AMI and identify signs of residual inflammation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analyzed 205 patients (age, 59.77±9.24 years; 92.20% men) with AMI ≤1 month and matched them with 205 patients with stable coronary artery disease (age, 60.52±10.04 years; 90.24% men) based on age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Coronary computed tomography angiography scans were assessed for nonculprit plaque and vessel characteristics, plaque volumes by composition, high-risk plaques, and PVAT mean attenuation. Both patient groups exhibited similar noncalcified plaque volumes (383.35±313.23 versus 378.63±426.25 mm3, P=0.899). However, multivariable analysis revealed that patients post-AMI had a greater patient-wise noncalcified plaque volume ratio (estimate, 0.089 [95% CI, 0.053-0.125], P<0.001), largely attributed to a higher fibrofatty and necrotic core volume ratio, along with higher peri-lesion PVAT mean attenuation (estimate, 3.968 [95% CI, 2.556-5.379], P<0.001). When adjusted for vessel length, patients post-AMI had more high-risk plaques (estimate, 0.417 [95% CI, 0.298-0.536], P<0.001) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients post-AMI displayed heightened noncalcified plaque components, largely due to fibrofatty and necrotic core content, more high-risk plaques, and increased PVAT mean attenuation on a per-patient level, highlighting the necessity for refined risk assessment in patients with AMI after treatment.

Additional prognostic impact of plaque characterization with on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve in coronary CT angiography

BACKGROUND

On-site computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) is a feasible method for examining lesion-specific ischemia, and plaque analysis of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is useful for predicting future cardiac events. However, their utility and association on a per-vessel level remain unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed vessels showing 50-90 % stenosis on CCTA where planned revascularization was not performed after CCTA within 90 days. Relevant features, including CT-FFR and the plaque burden [necrotic core to the total plaque volume (% necrotic core), and non-calcified plaque (NCP) to vessel volume (% NCP)] using a novel algorithm for analyzing plaque to predict vessel-oriented composite outcomes (VOCO), including cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and unplanned vessel-related revascularization, were assessed.

RESULTS

In 256 patients (68.7 ± 9.4 years; 73.8 % male) with 354 vessels (10.5 % CT-FFR ≤ 0.80), VOCO occurred in 24 vessels (6.8 %) during a median follow-up of 3.6 years. Multivariable Cox analysis revealed CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 had the pronounced impact on VOCO, and moreover, higher % necrotic core and % NCP were independently associated with VOCO [adjusted hazard ratio 3.43 (95 % confidence interval 1.42-8.29) and 4.05 (1.19-13.71), respectively], especially for vessels with CT-FFR > 0.80.

CONCLUSIONS

In vessels without planned revascularization, per-vessel CT-FFR ≤ 0.80 was the notable predictor of future cardiac events. Additionally, necrotic core volume and NCP were identified as independent predictors along with CT-FFR.

Interscan reproducibility of computed tomography derived coronary plaque volume measurements

BACKGROUND

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) enables detailed quantification and characterization of coronary atherosclerotic plaques, offering diagnostic and prognostic value. Interscan reproducibility studies on plaque volume measurements are limited. This study aims to assess the interscan reproducibility of coronary plaque quantification and the implications of clinical and technical characteristics on interscan reproducibility.

METHODS

CCTA was performed twice in 101 patients with known coronary artery disease at a 1-h interval. The scans were conducted using identical CCTA acquisition protocols. Coronary plaque volumes were quantified using a semi-automated software and performed on a per-lesion, per-vessel, and per-patient level.

RESULTS

Median plaque volumes were comparable between the first and second CCTA scan. Interscan correlation was high for total plaque (TP), non-calcified plaque (NCP), and calcified plaque (CP) across all analyses (Pearson's coefficient 0.93-0.99), but lower for low-density non-calcified plaque (LD-NCP) volume measurements (Pearson's coefficient 0.74-0.77). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated higher interscan agreement on a per-patient level compared to on per-vessel and per-lesion level. Interscan reproducibility on CP volumes was affected by CT image quality with narrower LoA in scans with the highest image quality score (p ​= ​0.003), or lowest image reconstructive iteration level (p ​< ​0.001). Limits of agreement were significantly narrower for TP, NCP, and CP volumes in LAD-lesions and vessels compared to non-LAD lesions and vessels (p ​≤ ​0.001).

CONCLUSION

Overall reproducibility of repeated CCTA derived plaque measurements by a semi-automated software was modest, and was influenced by image quality, image reconstruction settings, and lesion location.

Standards for quantitative assessments by coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA): An expert consensus document of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography (SCCT)

In current clinical practice, qualitative or semi-quantitative measures are primarily used to report coronary artery disease on cardiac CT. With advancements in cardiac CT technology and automated post-processing tools, quantitative measures of coronary disease severity have become more broadly available. Quantitative coronary CT angiography has great potential value for clinical management of patients, but also for research. This document aims to provide definitions and standards for the performance and reporting of quantitative measures of coronary artery disease by cardiac CT.

Lipoprotein(a) and Long-Term Plaque Progression, Low-Density Plaque, and Pericoronary Inflammation

Importance

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, long-term effects on coronary atherosclerotic plaque phenotype, high-risk plaque formation, and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation remain unknown.

Objective

To investigate the association of Lp(a) levels with long-term coronary artery plaque progression, high-risk plaque, and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This single-center prospective cohort study included 299 patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent per-protocol repeated coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) imaging with an interscan interval of 10 years. Thirty-two patients were excluded because of coronary artery bypass grafting, resulting in a study population of 267 patients. Data for this study were collected from October 2008 to October 2022 and analyzed from March 2023 to March 2024.

Exposures

The median scan interval was 10.2 years. Lp(a) was measured at follow-up using an isoform-insensitive assay. CCTA scans were analyzed with a previously validated artificial intelligence-based algorithm (atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography).

Main Outcome and Measures

The association between Lp(a) and change in percent plaque volumes was investigated in linear mixed-effects models adjusted for clinical risk factors. Secondary outcomes were presence of low-density plaque and presence of increased pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation at baseline and follow-up CCTA imaging.

Results

The 267 included patients had a mean age of 57.1 (SD, 7.3) years and 153 were male (57%). Patients with Lp(a) levels of 125 nmol/L or higher had twice as high percent atheroma volume (6.9% vs 3.0%; P = .01) compared with patients with Lp(a) levels less than 125 nmol/L. Adjusted for other risk factors, every doubling of Lp(a) resulted in an additional 0.32% (95% CI, 0.04-0.60) increment in percent atheroma volume during the 10 years of follow-up. Every doubling of Lp(a) resulted in an odds ratio of 1.23 (95% CI, 1.00-1.51) and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.01-1.45) for the presence of low-density plaque at baseline and follow-up, respectively. Patients with higher Lp(a) levels had increased pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation around both the right coronary artery and left anterior descending at baseline and follow-up.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this long-term prospective serial CCTA imaging study, higher Lp(a) levels were associated with increased progression of coronary plaque burden and increased presence of low-density noncalcified plaque and pericoronary adipose tissue inflammation. These data suggest an impact of elevated Lp(a) levels on coronary atherogenesis of high-risk, inflammatory, rupture-prone plaques over the long term.

Reproducibility of artificial intelligence-enabled plaque measurements between systolic and diastolic phases from coronary computed tomography angiography

OBJECTIVES

Current coronary CT angiography (CTA) guidelines suggest both end-systolic and mid-diastolic phases of the cardiac cycle can be used for CTA image acquisition. However, whether differences in the phase of the cardiac cycle influence coronary plaque measurements is not known. We aim to explore the potential impact of cardiac phases on quantitative plaque assessment.

METHODS

We enrolled 39 consecutive patients (23 male, age 66.2 ± 11.5 years) who underwent CTA with dual-source CT with visually evident coronary atherosclerosis and with good image quality. End-systolic and mid- to late-diastolic phase images were reconstructed from the same CTA scan. Quantitative plaque and stenosis were analyzed in both systolic and diastolic images using artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled plaque analysis software (Autoplaque).

RESULTS

Overall, 186 lesions from 39 patients were analyzed. There were excellent agreement and correlation between systolic and diastolic images for all plaque volume measurements (Lin's concordance coefficient ranging from 0.97 to 0.99; R ranging from 0.96 to 0.98). There were no substantial intrascan differences per patient between systolic and diastolic phases (p > 0.05 for all) for total (1017.1 ± 712.9 mm3 vs. 1014.7 ± 696.2 mm3), non-calcified (861.5 ± 553.7 mm3 vs. 856.5 ± 528.7 mm3), calcified (155.7 ± 229.3 mm3 vs. 158.2 ± 232.4 mm3), and low-density non-calcified plaque volume (151.4 ± 106.1 mm3 vs. 151.5 ± 101.5 mm3) and diameter stenosis (42.5 ± 18.4% vs 41.3 ± 15.1%).

CONCLUSION

Excellent agreement and no substantial differences were observed in AI-enabled quantitative plaque measurements on CTA in systolic and diastolic images. Following further validation, standardized plaque measurements can be performed from CTA in systolic or diastolic cardiac phase.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Quantitative plaque assessment using artificial intelligence-enabled plaque analysis software can provide standardized plaque quantification, regardless of cardiac phase.

KEY POINTS

• The impact of different cardiac phases on coronary plaque measurements is unknown. • Plaque analysis using artificial intelligence-enabled software on systolic and diastolic CT angiography images shows excellent agreement. • Quantitative coronary artery plaque assessment can be performed regardless of cardiac phase.

Effects of low-tube voltage coronary CT angiography on plaque and pericoronary fat assessment: intraindividual comparison

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of low tube voltage on coronary plaques and pericoronary fat assessment, and to compare their extent among various levels of low voltage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were recommended for high-pitch low-tube voltage coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), and they were included if they had poor image quality and were referred to a conventional CCTA. The patients were classified into a low-voltage group (with 70-kV, 80-kV, and 90-kV subgroups) and a conventional group (100/120 kV). Their total plaque and subcomponent volumes and pericoronary fat attenuation index (FAI) were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 1002 image slices (from 65 patients and 74 plaques) were included, including 21, 31, 13, 4, and 61 patients in the 70-kV, 80-kV, 90-kV, 100-kV, and 120-kV groups respectively. The CT values of noncalcified plaques in the conventional and low-voltage groups were 54.6 ± 21.3 HU and 31.5 ± 22.6 HU, respectively (p < 0.05). Compared with the conventional group, the necrotic core and calcification volume were increased, and the fibrolipid volume, periplaque, and right coronary artery FAI were decreased in the low-voltage group and its subgroups (p < 0.001). The magnitude of changes in fibrous and calcification volumes increased in the 70-kV subgroup compared with that in the 90-kV subgroup (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Low tube voltages, particularly of 70 kV, have a significant effect on coronary plaque and FAI. The effect of low voltage on plaque composition is characterized by a polarization pattern, i.e., a decrease in fibrolipid (medium density) and an increase in necrotic core (low density) and calcification (high density).

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Our results highlight the comparability and repeatability of plaque and pericoronary fat assessments facilitated by the same or a similar tube voltage. It is necessary to carry out studies on the specificity threshold of low tube voltage at each level.

KEY POINTS

• Low tube voltage had a significant effect on coronary plaque and pericoronary fat, particularly 70 kV. • The effect of low tube voltage on plaque composition shows the shift from medium-density mixed components to low- and high-density components. • It is necessary to correct the specificity threshold or attenuation difference for low tube voltage at each level.

Polygenic Risk Is Associated With Long-Term Coronary Plaque Progression and High-Risk Plaque

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal relation between coronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk score (PRS) and long-term plaque progression and high-risk plaque (HRP) features is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of CAD PRS on long-term coronary plaque progression and HRP.

METHODS

Patients underwent CAD PRS measurement and prospective serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) imaging. Coronary CTA scans were analyzed with a previously validated artificial intelligence-based algorithm (atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography imaging). The relationship between CAD PRS and change in percent atheroma volume (PAV), percent noncalcified plaque progression, and HRP prevalence was investigated in linear mixed-effect models adjusted for baseline plaque volume and conventional risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 288 subjects (mean age 58 ± 7 years; 60% male) were included in this study with a median scan interval of 10.2 years. At baseline, patients with a high CAD PRS had a more than 5-fold higher PAV than those with a low CAD PRS (10.4% vs 1.9%; P < 0.001). Per 10 years of follow-up, a 1 SD increase in CAD PRS was associated with a 0.69% increase in PAV progression in the multivariable adjusted model. CAD PRS provided additional discriminatory benefit for above-median noncalcified plaque progression during follow-up when added to a model with conventional risk factors (AUC: 0.73 vs 0.69; P = 0.039). Patients with high CAD PRS had an OR of 2.85 (95% CI: 1.14-7.14; P = 0.026) and 6.16 (95% CI: 2.55-14.91; P < 0.001) for having HRP at baseline and follow-up compared with those with low CAD PRS.

CONCLUSIONS

Polygenic risk is strongly associated with future long-term plaque progression and HRP in patients suspected of having CAD.

Special Report on the Consensus QIBA Profile for Objective Analytical Validation of Non-calcified and High-risk Plaque and Other Biomarkers using Computed Tomography Angiography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence is building in support of the clinical utility of atherosclerotic plaque imaging by computed tomography angiography (CTA). There is increasing organized activity to embrace non-calcified plaque (NCP) as a formally defined biomarker for clinical trials, and high-risk plaque (HRP) for clinical care, as the most relevant measures for the field to advance and worthy of community efforts to validate. Yet the ability to assess the quantitative performance of any given specific solution to make these measurements or classifications is not available. Vendors use differing definitions, assessment metrics, and validation data sets to describe their offerings without clinician users having the capability to make objective assessments of accuracy and precision and how this affects diagnostic confidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The QIBA Profile for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by CTA was created by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) to improve objectivity and decrease the variability of noninvasive plaque phenotyping. The Profile provides claims on the accuracy and precision of plaque measures individually and when combined.

RESULTS

Individual plaque morphology measurements are evaluated in terms of bias (accuracy), slope (consistency of the bias across the measurement range, needed for measurements of change), and variability. The multiparametric plaque stability phenotype is evaluated in terms of agreement with expert pathologists. The Profile is intended for a broad audience, including those engaged in discovery science, clinical trials, and patient care.

CONCLUSION

This report provides a rationale and overview of the Profile claims and how to comply with the Profile in research and clinical practice.

SUMMARY STATEMENT

This article summarizes objective means to validate the analytical performance of non-calcified plaque (NCP), other emerging plaque morphology measurements, and multiparametric histology-defined high-risk plaque (HRP), as outlined in the QIBA Profile for Atherosclerosis Biomarkers by CTA.

Regression and stabilization of atherogenic plaques

Atherosclerotic plaque assessment has become a crucial element in the examination of cardiovascular diseases. Plaque may exhibit progression and could become unstable if not treated, making plaque regression and stabilization among the most important goals of any cardiovascular intervention in cardiovascular medicine. In this review, we explore the current understanding of plaque regression and stabilization, discuss imaging and measurement techniques, and examine the evidence for pharmacological interventions and other interventions aimed at addressing this condition.

Influencing factors and improvement methods of coronary artery plaque evaluation in CT

Accurate evaluation of the nature and composition of coronary plaque involves clinical follow-up and prognosis. Coronary CT angiography is the most commonly non-invasive method for plaque evaluation, however, the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of plaque based on CT value is inaccurate, due to the influence of luminal attenuation, tube voltage, parameter setting and the subjectivity.

Coronary computed tomography angiography for clinical practice

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common condition caused by the accumulation of atherosclerotic plaques. It can be classified into stable CAD or acute coronary syndrome. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has a high negative predictive value and is used as the first examination for diagnosing stable CAD, particularly in patients at intermediate-to-high risk. CCTA is also adopted for diagnosing acute coronary syndrome, particularly in patients at low-to-intermediate risk. Myocardial ischemia does not always co-exist with coronary artery stenosis, and the positive predictive value of CCTA for myocardial ischemia is limited. However, CCTA has overcome this limitation with recent technological advancements such as CT perfusion and CT-fractional flow reserve. In addition, CCTA can be used to assess coronary artery plaques. Thus, the indications for CCTA have expanded, leading to an increased demand for radiologists. The CAD reporting and data system (CAD-RADS) 2.0 was recently proposed for standardizing CCTA reporting. This RADS evaluates and categorizes patients based on coronary artery stenosis and the overall amount of coronary artery plaque and links this to patient management. In this review, we aimed to review the major trials and guidelines for CCTA to understand its clinical role. Furthermore, we aimed to introduce the CAD-RADS 2.0 including the assessment of coronary artery stenosis, plaque, and other key findings, and highlight the steps for CCTA reporting. Finally, we aimed to present recent research trends including the perivascular fat attenuation index, artificial intelligence, and the advancements in CT technology.

Innovations in cardiac computed tomography: Imaging in coronary artery disease

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as a pivotal tool in the non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Recent advancements in imaging techniques, quantitative plaque assessment methods, assessment of coronary physiology, and perivascular coronary inflammation have propelled CCTA to the forefront of CAD management, enabling precise risk stratification, disease monitoring, and evaluation of treatment response. However, challenges persist, including the need for cardiovascular outcomes data for therapy modifications based on CCTA findings and the lack of standardized quantitative plaque assessment techniques to establish universal guidelines for treatment strategies. This review explores the current utilization of CCTA in clinical practice, highlighting its clinical impact and discussing challenges and opportunities for future development. By addressing these nuances, CCTA holds promise for revolutionizing coronary imaging and improving CAD management in the years to come. Ultimately, the goal is to provide precise risk stratification, optimize medical therapy, and improve cardiovascular outcomes while ensuring cost-effectiveness for healthcare systems.

Prediction of the development of new coronary atherosclerotic plaques with radiomics

BACKGROUND

Radiomics is expected to identify imaging features beyond the human eye. We investigated whether radiomics can identify coronary segments that will develop new atherosclerotic plaques on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

METHODS

From a prospective multinational registry of patients with serial CCTA studies at ≥ 2-year intervals, segments without identifiable coronary plaque at baseline were selected and radiomic features were extracted. Cox models using clinical risk factors (Model 1), radiomic features (Model 2) and both clinical risk factors and radiomic features (Model 3) were constructed to predict the development of a coronary plaque, defined as total PV ​≥ ​1 ​mm3, at follow-up CCTA in each segment.

RESULTS

In total, 9583 normal coronary segments were identified from 1162 patients (60.3 ​± ​9.2 years, 55.7% male) and divided 8:2 into training and test sets. At follow-up CCTA, 9.8% of the segments developed new coronary plaque. The predictive power of Models 1 and 2 was not different in both the training and test sets (C-index [95% confidence interval (CI)] of Model 1 vs. Model 2: 0.701 [0.690-0.712] vs. 0.699 [0.0.688-0.710] and 0.696 [0.671-0.725] vs. 0.0.691 [0.667-0.715], respectively, all p ​> ​0.05). The addition of radiomic features to clinical risk factors improved the predictive power of the Cox model in both the training and test sets (C-index [95% CI] of Model 3: 0.772 [0.762-0.781] and 0.767 [0.751-0.787], respectively, all p ​< ​00.0001 compared to Models 1 and 2).

CONCLUSION

Radiomic features can improve the identification of segments that would develop new coronary atherosclerotic plaque.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT0280341.

Advanced CT Imaging for the Assessment of Calcific Coronary Artery Disease and PCI Planning

Vascular calcification is a hallmark of atherosclerosis and adds considerable challenges for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This review underscores the critical role of coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography in assessing and quantifying vascular calcification for optimal PCI planning. Severe calcification significantly impacts procedural outcomes, necessitating accurate preprocedural evaluation. We describe the potential of coronary CT for calcium assessment and how CT may enhance precision in device selection and procedural strategy. These advancements, along with the ongoing Precise Procedural and PCI Plan study, represent a transformative shift toward personalized PCI interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the challenging landscape of calcified coronary lesions.

Optimization of uniformity in coronary artery enhancement using a bolus tracking technique with a dual region of interest in coronary computed tomographic angiography

BACKGROUND

Consistent coronary artery enhancement is essential to achieve accurate and reproducible quantification of coronary plaque composition.

PURPOSE

To optimize coronary artery uniformity of enhancement using a bolus tracking technique with a dual region of interest (ROI) in coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) on a 320-detector CT scanner.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study recruited 100 consecutive patients who underwent CCTA and were randomly divided into two groups, namely, a manual trigger group (n = 50), in which a manual fast start technique was used to start the diagnostic scan with the visual evaluation of attenuation in the left atrium and left ventricle, and an automatic trigger group (n = 50), in which a bolus tracking technique was used to automatically start the breath-holding command and diagnostic scan with two ROIs placed in the right and left ventricles. Coronary artery image quality was assessed using quantitative and qualitative scores. The enhancement uniformity was characterized by attenuation variability of the ascending aorta (AAO) and coronary arteries.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences in the image quality of the coronary arteries were observed between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The coefficients of variation (COVs) of arterial attenuation in the automatic trigger group were significantly smaller than in the manual trigger group (AAO: 9.89% vs. 17.93%; LMA: 10.35% vs. 18.98%; LAD proximal: 12.09% vs. 20.84%; LCX proximal: 11.85% vs. 20.95%; RCA proximal: 12.13% vs. 20.84%; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The automatic trigger technique accompanied with dual ROI provides consistent coronary artery enhancement and optimizes coronary artery enhancement uniformity in CCTA on a 320-detector CT scanner.

Determination of lipid-rich plaques by artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative computed tomography using near-infrared spectroscopy as reference

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Artificial intelligence quantitative CT (AI-QCT) determines coronary plaque morphology with high efficiency and accuracy. Yet, its performance to quantify lipid-rich plaque remains unclear. This study investigated the performance of AI-QCT for the detection of low-density noncalcified plaque (LD-NCP) using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS).

METHODS

The INVICTUS Registry is a multi-center registry enrolling patients undergoing clinically indicated coronary CT angiography and IVUS, NIRS-IVUS, or optical coherence tomography. We assessed the performance of various Hounsfield unit (HU) and volume thresholds of LD-NCP using maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400 as the reference standard and the correlation of the vessel area, lumen area, plaque burden, and lesion length between AI-QCT and IVUS.

RESULTS

This study included 133 atherosclerotic plaques from 47 patients who underwent coronary CT angiography and NIRS-IVUS The area under the curve of LD-NCP<30HU was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.00] with an optimal volume threshold of 2.30 mm3. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 94% (95% CI: 88-96%], 93% (95% CI: 76-98%), and 94% (95% CI: 88-98%), respectively, using <30 HU and 2.3 mm3, versus 42%, 100%, and 27% using <30 HU and >0 mm3 volume of LD-NCP (p < 0.001 for accuracy and specificity). AI-QCT strongly correlated with IVUS measurements; vessel area (r2 = 0.87), lumen area (r2 = 0.87), plaque burden (r2 = 0.78) and lesion length (r2 = 0.88), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

AI-QCT demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance in detecting significant LD-NCP using maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400 as the reference standard. Additionally, vessel area, lumen area, plaque burden, and lesion length derived from AI-QCT strongly correlated with respective IVUS measurements.

Advances in Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiographic Imaging of Atherosclerosis for Risk Stratification and Preventive Care

The diagnostic evaluation of coronary artery disease is undergoing a dramatic transformation with a new focus on atherosclerotic plaque. This review details the evidence needed for effective risk stratification and targeted preventive care based on recent advances in automated measurement of atherosclerosis from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). To date, research findings support that automated stenosis measurement is reasonably accurate, but evidence on variability by location, artery size, or image quality is unknown. The evidence for quantification of atherosclerotic plaque is unfolding, with strong concordance reported between coronary CTA and intravascular ultrasound measurement of total plaque volume (r >0.90). Statistical variance is higher for smaller plaque volumes. Limited data are available on how technical or patient-specific factors result in measurement variability by compositional subgroups. Coronary artery dimensions vary by age, sex, heart size, coronary dominance, and race and ethnicity. Accordingly, quantification programs excluding smaller arteries affect accuracy for women, patients with diabetes, and other patient subsets. Evidence is unfolding that quantification of atherosclerotic plaque is useful to enhance risk prediction, yet more evidence is required to define high-risk patients across varied populations and to determine whether such information is incremental to risk factors or currently used coronary computed tomography techniques (eg, coronary artery calcium scoring or visual assessment of plaque burden or stenosis). In summary, there is promise for the utility of coronary CTA quantification of atherosclerosis, especially if it can lead to targeted and more intensive cardiovascular prevention, notably for those patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease and high-risk plaque features. The new quantification techniques available to imagers must not only provide sufficient added value to improve patient care, but also add minimal and reasonable cost to alleviate the financial burden on our patients and the health care system.

Computed Tomography Assessment of Coronary Atherosclerosis: From Threshold-Based Evaluation to Histologically Validated Plaque Quantification

Arterial plaque rupture and thrombosis is the primary cause of major cardiovascular and neurovascular events. The identification of atherosclerosis, especially high-risk plaques, is therefore crucial to identify high-risk patients and to implement preventive therapies. Computed tomography angiography has the ability to visualize and characterize vascular plaques. The standard methods for plaque evaluation rely on the assessment of plaque burden, stenosis severity, the presence of positive remodeling, napkin ring sign, and spotty calcification, as well as Hounsfield Unit (HU)-based thresholding for plaque quantification; the latter with multiple shortcomings. Semiautomated threshold-based segmentation techniques with predefined HU ranges identify and quantify limited plaque characteristics, such as low attenuation, non-calcified, and calcified plaque components. Contrary to HU-based thresholds, histologically validated plaque characterization, and quantification, an emerging Artificial intelligence-based approach has the ability to differentiate specific tissue types based on a biological correlate, such as lipid-rich necrotic core and intraplaque hemorrhage that determine plaque vulnerability. In this article, we review the relevance of plaque characterization and quantification and discuss the benefits and limitations of the currently available plaque assessment and classification techniques.

Imaging the Vulnerable Carotid Plaque with CT: Caveats to Consider. Comment on Wang et al. Identification Markers of Carotid Vulnerable Plaques: An Update. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1192

We read with great interest the review by Wang et al. entitled "Identification Markers of Carotid Vulnerable Plaques: An Update", recently published in Biomolecules [...].

Multimodality Imaging in Ischemic Chronic Cardiomyopathy

Ischemic chronic cardiomyopathy (ICC) is still one of the most common cardiac diseases leading to the development of myocardial ischemia, infarction, or heart failure. The application of several imaging modalities can provide information regarding coronary anatomy, coronary artery disease, myocardial ischemia and tissue characterization. In particular, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can provide information regarding coronary plaque stenosis, its composition, and the possible evaluation of myocardial ischemia using fractional flow reserve CT or CT perfusion. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can be used to evaluate cardiac function as well as the presence of ischemia. In addition, CMR can be used to characterize the myocardial tissue of hibernated or infarcted myocardium. Echocardiography is the most widely used technique to achieve information regarding function and myocardial wall motion abnormalities during myocardial ischemia. Nuclear medicine can be used to evaluate perfusion in both qualitative and quantitative assessment. In this review we aim to provide an overview regarding the different noninvasive imaging techniques for the evaluation of ICC, providing information ranging from the anatomical assessment of coronary artery arteries to the assessment of ischemic myocardium and myocardial infarction. In particular this review is going to show the different noninvasive approaches based on the specific clinical history of patients with ICC.