Noninvasive Evaluation of Cardiac Chamber Pressures Using Subharmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation With Definity Microbubbles

Investigation Into the Subharmonic Response of Three Contrast Agents in Static and Dynamic Flow Environments Using a Commercially Available Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanner

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the subharmonic response of Lumason (also known as SonoVue; Bracco, Milan, Italy) to static and dynamic ambient pressures, with a direct comparison to Sonazoid (GE HealthCare, Oslo, Norway) and Definity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, MA, USA). The subharmonic responses of contrast agents can be exploited to perform subharmonic-aided pressure estimation.

METHODS

The subharmonic response of each ultrasound contrast agent was evaluated in both a static and dynamic tank using a commercially available Logiq E10 clinical ultrasound scanner (GE HealthCare) equipped with subharmonic imaging (SHI) and an acoustic power-optimization algorithm. A C1-6 curvilinear array that transmits at 2.5 MHz and receives at 1.25 MHz in SHI mode was used to acquire the subharmonic signals. Data was transferred offline into MATLAB (MathWorks) to perform linear regression analysis and statistical testing for significance of the slopes (i.e., agent sensitivity).

RESULTS

Sonazoid and Definity showed an inverse linear dependency between subharmonic signal and hydrostatic pressure at all pressure ranges (static and dynamic) tested, with maximum sensitivity under 50 mmHg in the static tank (-0.190 and -0.194 dB/mmHg for Sonazoid and Definity, respectively). Lumason exhibited a tri-phasic subharmonic behavior, beginning with a linear trend from 0 to 90 mmHg (sensitivity = 0.069 dB/mmHg), followed by a plateau from 100 to 130 mmHg, and an inverse linear trend from 140 to 200 mmHg (sensitivity = -0.137 dB/mmHg).

CONCLUSION

The subharmonic response of Lumason is tri-phasic and differs from Sonazoid and Definity. Further investigation is needed to solidify understanding of the subharmonic behavior of Lumason to identify its usefulness for subharmonic-aided pressure estimation.

Impact of Microbubble Degradation and Flow Velocity on Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE): An Experimental Investigation

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of microbubble degradation and flow velocity on Sub-Harmonic Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE), and to explore the correlation between subharmonic amplitude and pressure as a single factor.

METHODS

We develop an open-loop vascular phantom platform system and utilize a commercial ultrasound machine and microbubbles for subharmonic imaging. Subharmonic amplitude was measured continuously at constant pressure and flow velocity to assess the impact of microbubble degradation. Flow velocity was varied within a range of 4-14 cm/s at constant pressure to investigate its relationship to subharmonic amplitude. Furthermore, pressure was varied within a range of 10-110 mm Hg at constant flow velocity to assess its isolated effect on subharmonic amplitude.

RESULTS

Under constant pressure and flow velocity, subharmonic amplitude exhibited a continuous decrease at an average rate of 0.221 dB/min, signifying ongoing microbubble degradation during the experimental procedures. Subharmonic amplitude demonstrated a positive correlation with flow velocity, with a variation ratio of 0.423 dB/(cm/s). Under controlled conditions of microbubble degradation and flow velocity, a strong negative linear correlation was observed between pressure and subharmonic amplitude across different Mechanical Index (MI) settings (all R2 > 0.90). The sensitivity of SHAPE was determined to be 0.025 dB/mmHg at an MI of 0.04.

CONCLUSION

The assessment of SHAPE sensitivity is affected by microbubble degradation and flow velocity. Excluding the aforementioned influencing factors, a strong linear negative correlation between pressure and subharmonic amplitude was still evident, albeit with a sensitivity coefficient lower than previously reported values.

Acoustic response and ambient pressure sensitivity characterization of SonoVue for noninvasive pressure estimation

Subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) is a noninvasive pressure measurement technique based on the pressure dependent subharmonic signal from contrast microbubbles. Here, SonoVue microbubble with a sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) core, was investigated for use in SHAPE. The study uses excitations of 25-700 kPa peak negative pressure (PNP) and 3 MHz frequency over eight pressurization cycles between atmospheric pressure and overpressures, ranging from 0 to 25 kPa (0 to 186 mm Hg). The SonoVue subharmonic response was characterized into two types. Unlike other microbubbles, SonoVue showed significant subharmonic signals at low excitations (PNPs, 25-400 kPa), denoted here as type I subharmonic. It linearly decreased with increasing overpressure (-0.52 dB/kPa at 100 kPa PNP). However, over multiple pressurization-depressurization cycles, type I subharmonic changed; its value at atmospheric pressure decreased over multiple cycles, and at later cycles, it recorded an increase in amplitude with overpressure (highest, +13 dB at 50 kPa PNP and 10 kPa overpressure). The subharmonic at higher excitations (PNP > 400 kPa), denoted here as type II subharmonic, showed a consistent decrease with the ambient pressure increase with strongest sensitivity of -0.4 dB/kPa at 500 kPa PNP.

The Effect of Mixing Iodinated Contrast Media and Ultrasound Contrast Agents on Subharmonic Signals

Subharmonic aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) is a technique that utilizes subharmonic signals from microbubble contrast agents for pressure estimation. Validation of the SHAPE technique relies on synchronous measurements of in vivo pressures using contrast microbubbles and a pressure catheter (reference standard). For the guidance and placement of pressure catheter in vivo, iodinated contrast is used with fluoroscopy. Therefore, during data acquisition for validation studies of the SHAPE technique, both contrast microbubbles and iodinated contrast are present simultaneously within the vasculature. This study aims to elucidate the effects of iodinated contrast (Visipaque, GE HealthCare) on subharmonic signal amplitude from contrast microbubbles (Definity, Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc.). In an acrylic water tank, 0.06 mL of Definity and varied amounts of Visipaque (0.14, 0.43, 0.85, and 1.70 mL) were added to 425 mL of deionized water. Ultrasound scanning was performed with a SonixTablet scanner (BK Medical Systems) using optimized parameters for SHAPE with Definity (ftransmit/receive = 3.0/1.5 MHz; chirp down pulse). Subharmonic data was acquired and analyzed at 9 different incident acoustic outputs (n = 3). Results showed an increase in subharmonic signal amplitude from Definity microbubbles in the presence of 0.14 mL Visipaque by 2.8 ± 1.3 dB (p < .001), no change with 0.85 mL Visipaque (0.7 ± 1.2 dB; p = .09) and a decrease in subharmonic amplitude in the presence of 1.70 mL Visipaque by 1.9 ± 0.7 dB (p < .001). While statistically significant effect on subharmonic signal amplitude of Definity microbubbles was noted due to the mixture, the magnitude of the effect was minimal (~2.8 dB) and unlikely to impact in vivo SHAPE measurements.

Evaluation of Intracardiac Pressures Using Subharmonic-aided Pressure Estimation with Sonazoid Microbubbles

Purpose To investigate if the right ventricular (RV) systolic and left ventricular (LV) diastolic pressures can be obtained noninvasively using the subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) technique with Sonazoid microbubbles. Materials and Methods Individuals scheduled for a left and/or right heart catheterization were prospectively enrolled in this institutional review board-approved clinical trial from 2017 to 2020. A standard-of-care catheterization procedure was performed by advancing fluid-filled pressure catheters into the LV and aorta (n = 25) or RV (n = 22), and solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheters into the LV and aorta in a subset of participants (n = 18). Study participants received an infusion of Sonazoid microbubbles (GE HealthCare), and SHAPE data were acquired using a validated interface developed on a SonixTablet (BK Medical) US scanner, synchronously with the pressure catheter data. A conversion factor, derived using cuff-based pressure measurements with a SphygmoCor XCEL PWA (ATCOR) and subharmonic signal from the aorta, was used to convert the subharmonic signal into pressure values. Errors between the pressure measurements obtained using the SHAPE technique and pressure catheter were compared. Results The mean errors in pressure measurements obtained with the SHAPE technique relative to those of the fluid-filled pressure catheter were 1.6 mm Hg ± 1.5 [SD] (P = .85), 8.4 mm Hg ± 6.2 (P = .04), and 7.4 mm Hg ± 5.7 (P = .09) for RV systolic, LV minimum diastolic, and LV end-diastolic pressures, respectively. Relative to the measurements with the solid-state high-fidelity pressure catheter, the mean errors in LV minimum diastolic and LV end-diastolic pressures were 7.2 mm Hg ± 4.5 and 6.8 mm Hg ± 3.3 (P ≥ .44), respectively. Conclusion These results indicate that SHAPE with Sonazoid may have the potential to provide clinically relevant RV systolic and LV diastolic pressures. Keywords: Ultrasound-Contrast, Cardiac, Aorta, Left Ventricle, Right Ventricle ClinicalTrials.gov registration no.: NCT03245255 © RSNA, 2024.

Noninvasive Estimation of Tumor Interstitial Fluid Pressure from Subharmonic Scattering of Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles

The noninvasive estimation of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) using ultrasound contrast agent (UCA) microbubbles as pressure sensors will provide tumor treatments and efficacy assessments with a promising tool. This study aimed to verify the efficacy of the optimal acoustic pressure in vitro in the prediction of tumor IFPs based on UCA microbubbles' subharmonic scattering. A customized ultrasound scanner was used to generate subharmonic signals from microbubbles' nonlinear oscillations, and the optimal acoustic pressure was determined in vitro when the subharmonic amplitude reached the most sensitive to hydrostatic pressure changes. This optimal acoustic pressure was then applied to predict IFPs in tumor-bearing mouse models, which were further compared with the reference IFPs measured using a standard tissue fluid pressure monitor. An inverse linear relationship and good correlation (r = -0.853, p < 0.001) existed between the subharmonic amplitude and tumor IFPs at the optimal acoustic pressure of 555 kPa, and pressure sensitivity was 1.019 dB/mmHg. No statistical differences were found between the pressures measured by the standard device and those estimated via the subharmonic amplitude, as confirmed by cross-validation (mean absolute errors from 2.00 to 3.09 mmHg, p > 0.05). Our findings demonstrated that in vitro optimized acoustic parameters for UCA microbubbles' subharmonic scattering can be applied for the noninvasive estimation of tumor IFPs.