A 3D morphometric follow-up analysis after frontoorbital advancement in non-syndromic craniosynostosis

Surgical strategy in treatment of metopic synostosis in a single centre experience: technical note and quantitative analysis of the outcomes

PURPOSE

Trigonocephaly is the most common craniosynostosis involving orbits. Although some degree of agreement has been reached regarding surgical timing and indications for treatment, there is no consensus regarding the ideal operative technique to guarantee an optimal morphological outcome. The purpose of this study is to describe both strategies and to compare morphological outcomes by means of morphological surface analysis obtained from three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry, with two different techniques.

METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 43 patients with metopic synostosis surgically treated between 2004 and 2020. Two different techniques were applied, addressed as technique A and B. Ten patients undergone postoperative 3d stereophotogrammetry were enrolled, and cephalometric measurements were taken and compared to a cohort of unaffected patients matched by age and gender.

RESULTS

Comparison of the groups demonstrated a hypercorrection of the metopic angle of the second technique, associated with a slightly lower correction of the interfrontoparietal diameter. The metopic angle showed to be significantly undercorrected with the first method.

CONCLUSIONS

Alternated barrel staving technique appears to be a quick and satisfactory method in cranial remodelling for metopic synostosis. It guarantees an optimal aesthetic result in the first years after surgery.

3D Analysis of the Cranial and Facial Shape in Craniosynostosis Patients: A Systematic Review

With increasing interest in 3D photogrammetry, diverse methods have been developed for craniofacial shape analysis in craniosynostosis patients. This review provides an overview of these methods and offers recommendations for future studies. A systematic literature search was used to identify publications on 3D photogrammetry analyses in craniosynostosis patients until August 2023. Inclusion criteria were original research reporting on 3D photogrammetry analyses in patients with craniosynostosis and written in English. Sixty-three publications that had reproducible methods for measuring cranial, forehead, or facial shape were included in the systematic review. Cranial shape changes were commonly assessed using heat maps and curvature analyses. Publications assessing the forehead utilized volumetric measurements, angles, ratios, and mirroring techniques. Mirroring techniques were frequently used to determine facial asymmetry. Although 3D photogrammetry shows promise, methods vary widely between standardized and less conventional measurements. A standardized protocol for the selection and documentation of landmarks, planes, and measurements across the cranium, forehead, and face is essential for consistent clinical and research applications.

Nasal monobloc osteotomy for correction of late nasal and orbital asymmetry of unicoronal synostosis: A morphometric and outcomes study

BACKGROUND

Craniofacial asymmetry associated with unicoronal synostosis (UCS) may persist into the teenage years despite surgery in infancy. This study evaluated outcomes following a nasal monobloc procedure by mobilizing a united nasomaxillary and bilateral medial orbital segment of bone (nasal monobloc) to perform corrective translational and rotational movement for secondary correction of residual nasal-orbital asymmetry associated with UCS.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all UCS patients treated with nasal monobloc at our institution was performed. Demographic information was recorded, and pre- and postoperative 2D imaging was used for morphometric outcome analysis. Outcomes and complications were tabulated.

RESULTS

The study included 14 patients (5 males, 9 females; mean age 14.6 years; range 9.6 to 22.5 years; mean follow-up 70.6 months range 12 to 132 months). Ancillary procedures (scar revision, forehead/orbital contouring, MEDPOR® augmentation) were performed in all patients at the time of the nasal monobloc. One patient underwent a repeat procedure 6 years later following technique modification. Additionally, another patient experienced late overgrowth of the frontal sinus with forehead asymmetry. The morphometric analysis demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) pre-op to post-op improvements in naso-orbital asymmetry, as demonstrated by horizontal orbital aperture ratio (0.88 vs 0.99), midline to exocanthion ratio (0.91 vs 0.98), orbital index ratio (1.15 vs 1.01), and midline discrepancy (7.1 degrees vs 2.7 degrees).

CONCLUSION

Nasal monobloc osteotomy provides a reasonable surgical treatment to improve both the nasal and orbital asymmetries associated with unicoronal synostosis, including frontal nasal deviation, basal nasal deviation, and orbital aperture asymmetry. It is important to note that confounding anatomic variables such as globe dystopia, strabismus, and scleral show may affect the perception of orbital symmetry.

A Suture-specific Photo Score for Metopic Synostosis

Head shape assessments in children with metopic synostosis are a relevant outcome measure in addition to functional measures, such as neurocognitive outcomes, behavioral outcomes, and visual functioning outcomes. However, consensus on head shape assessments in children with metopic synostosis is lacking. The aim of this study is to develop a reproducible and reliable suture-specific photo score that can be used for cross-center comparison of phenotypical severity of metopic synostosis and evaluation of esthetic outcome of treatment later in childhood. We conducted a retrospective study among nonsyndromic metopic synostosis patients aged <18 years. Preoperative and postoperative photosets of patients with metopic synostosis from 6 expert centers were included. The photo score was discussed in the group of expert craniofacial plastic surgeons and pediatric neurosurgeons. Interrater reliability was determined with modified weighted Fleiss' kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients. Correlation between individual photo score items with overall phenotype was assessed using Spearman correlation analyses. The metopic synostosis photo score contained the following items: "wedging of the forehead", "hypotelorism", "temporal hollowing", "biparietal widening,"and an assessment of "overall phenotype". Items were scored on a 4-point ordinal scale ranging from normal to severe. We found moderate interrater reliability for all items, but substantial agreement for the summed scores. Correlation with overall phenotype was lowest for biparietal widening. To conclude, although agreement on individual photo score items was suboptimal, the agreement on the summed score was substantial, which indicates there is consensus on the overall severity of the metopic synostosis phenotype.

The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Classification of Craniofacial Deformities

Positional cranial deformities are a common finding in toddlers, yet differentiation from craniosynostosis can be challenging. The aim of this study was to train convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to classify craniofacial deformities based on 2D images generated using photogrammetry as a radiation-free imaging technique. A total of 487 patients with photogrammetry scans were included in this retrospective cohort study: children with craniosynostosis (n = 227), positional deformities (n = 206), and healthy children (n = 54). Three two-dimensional images were extracted from each photogrammetry scan. The datasets were divided into training, validation, and test sets. During the training, fine-tuned ResNet-152s were utilized. The performance was quantified using tenfold cross-validation. For the detection of craniosynostosis, sensitivity was at 0.94 with a specificity of 0.85. Regarding the differentiation of the five existing classes (trigonocephaly, scaphocephaly, positional plagiocephaly left, positional plagiocephaly right, and healthy), sensitivity ranged from 0.45 (positional plagiocephaly left) to 0.95 (scaphocephaly) and specificity ranged from 0.87 (positional plagiocephaly right) to 0.97 (scaphocephaly). We present a CNN-based approach to classify craniofacial deformities on two-dimensional images with promising results. A larger dataset would be required to identify rarer forms of craniosynostosis as well. The chosen 2D approach enables future applications for digital cameras or smartphones.

Photogrammetry Applied to Neurosurgery: A Literature Review

Photogrammetry refers to the process of creating 3D models and taking measurements through the use of photographs. Photogrammetry has many applications in neurosurgery, such as creating 3D anatomical models and diagnosing and evaluating head shape and posture deformities. This review aims to summarize the uses of the technique in the neurosurgical practice and showcase the systems and software required for its implementation. A literature review was done in the online database PubMed. Papers were searched using the keywords "photogrammetry", "neurosurgery", "neuroanatomy", "craniosynostosis" and "scoliosis". The identified articles were later put through primary (abstracts and titles) and secondary (full text) screening for eligibility for inclusion. In total, 86 articles were included in the review from 315 papers identified. The review showed that the main uses of photogrammetry in the field of neurosurgery are related to the creation of 3D models of complex neuroanatomical structures and surgical approaches, accompanied by the uses for diagnosis and evaluation of patients with structural deformities of the head and trunk, such as craniosynostosis and scoliosis. Additionally, three instances of photogrammetry applied for more specific aims, namely, cervical spine surgery, skull-base surgery, and radiosurgery, were identified. Information was extracted on the software and systems used to execute the method. With the development of the photogrammetric method, it has become possible to create accurate 3D models of physical objects and analyze images with dedicated software. In the neurosurgical setting, this has translated into the creation of anatomical teaching models and surgical 3D models as well as the evaluation of head and spine deformities. Through those applications, the method has the potential to facilitate the education of residents and medical students and the diagnosis of patient pathologies.

Machine Learning in Metopic Craniosynostosis: Does Phenotypic Severity Predict Long-Term Esthetic Outcome?

BACKGROUND

There have been few longitudinal studies assessing the effect of preoperative phenotypic severity on long-term esthetic outcomes in metopic craniosynostosis. This study evaluates the relationship between metopic severity and long-term esthetic outcomes using interfrontal angle (IFA) and CranioRate, a novel metopic synostosis severity measure.

METHODS

Patients with metopic craniosynostosis who underwent bifrontal orbital advancement and remodeling between 2012 and 2017 were reviewed. Preoperative computed tomography head scans were analyzed for IFA and CranioRate, a machine learning algorithm which generates quantitative severity ratings including metopic severity score (MSS) and cranial morphology deviation (CMD). Long-term esthetic outcomes were assessed by craniofacial surgeons using blinded 3-rater esthetic grading of clinical photos. Raters assessed Whitaker score and the presence of temporal hollowing, lateral orbital retrusion, frontal bone irregularities and/or "any visible irregularities."

RESULTS

Preoperative scans were performed at a mean age of 7.7±3.4 months, with average MSS of 6/10, CMD of 200/300, and IFA of 116.8±13.8 degrees. Patients underwent bifrontal orbital advancement and remodeling at mean 9.9±3.1 months. The average time from operation to esthetic assessment was 5.4±1.0 years. Pearson correlation revealed a significant negative correlation between MSS and age at computed tomography ( r =-0.451, P =0.004) and IFA ( r =-0.371, P =0.034) and between IFA and age at surgery ( r =-0.383, P =0.018). In multinomial logistic regression, preoperative MSS was the only independent predictor of visible irregularities (odds ratio=2.18, B =0.780, P =0.024) and preoperative IFA alone significantly predicted Whitaker score, with more acute IFA predicting worse Whitaker score (odds ratio=0.928, B =-0.074, P =0.928).

CONCLUSIONS

More severe preoperative phenotypes of metopic craniosynostosis were associated with worse esthetic dysmorphology. Objective measures of preoperative metopic severity predicted long-term esthetic outcomes.

Correction of trigonocephaly after endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet orthosis therapy: a 3D stereophotogrammetric study

OBJECTIVE

Endoscopic strip craniectomy with postoperative helmet orthosis therapy (ESCH) has emerged as a less invasive alternative to fronto-orbital remodeling for correction of trigonocephaly. However, there is no standardized objective method for monitoring morphological changes following ESCH. Such a method should be reproducible and avoid the use of ionizing radiation and general anesthesia for diagnostic imaging. The authors analyzed a number of metrics measured using 3D stereophotogrammetry (3DSPG) following ESCH, an imaging alternative that is free of ionizing radiation and can be performed on awake children.

METHODS

3DSPG images obtained at two time points (perisurgical and 1-year follow-up [FU]) of children with metopic synostosis who had undergone ESCH were analyzed and compared to 3DSPG images of age-matched control children without craniofacial anomalies. In total, 9 parameters were measured, the frontal angle and anteroposterior volume in addition to 7 novel parameters: anteroposterior area ratio, anteroposterior width ratios 1 and 2, and right and left anteroposterior diagonal ratios 30 and 60.

RESULTS

Six eligible patients were identified in the operated group, and 15 children were in the control group. All 9 parameters differed significantly between perisurgical and age-matched controls, as well as from perisurgical to FU scans. Comparison of FU scans of metopic synostosis patients who underwent surgery to scans of age-matched controls without metopic synostosis revealed that all parameters were statistically identical, with the exception of the right anteroposterior diagonal ratio 30, which was not fully corrected in the treated patients. The left anterior part of the head showed the most change in surface area maps.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot study, ESCH showed satisfactory results at 1 year, with improvements in all measured parameters compared to perisurgical results and normalization of 8 of 9 parameters compared to an age-matched control group. The results indicate that these parameters may be useful for craniofacial units for monitoring changes in head shape after ESCH for trigonocephaly and that 3DSPG, which avoids the use of anesthesia and ionizing radiation, is a satisfactory monitoring method.

Potential of Bone-Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Maxillofacial and Periodontal Regeneration: A Narrative Review

Bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) are one of the most widely studied postnatal stem cell populations and are considered to utilize more frequently in cell-based therapy and cancer. These types of stem cells can undergo multilineage differentiation including blood cells, cardiac cells, and osteogenic cells differentiation, thus providing an alternative source of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for tissue engineering and personalized medicine. Despite the ability to reprogram human adult somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in culture which provided a great opportunity and opened the new door for establishing the in vitro disease modeling and generating an unlimited source for cell base therapy, using MSCs for regeneration purposes still have a great chance to cure diseases. In this review, we discuss the important issues in MSCs biology including the origin and functions of MSCs and their application for craniofacial and periodontal tissue regeneration, discuss the potential and clinical applications of this type of stem cells in differentiation to maxillofacial bone and cartilage in vitro, and address important future hopes and challenges in this field.

Anthropometric cranial measurements in metopic craniosynostosis/trigonocephaly: diagnostic criteria, classification of severity and indications for surgery

ABSTRACT

Metopic craniosynostosis is the second most frequent type of craniosynostosis. When the phenotypic presentation has been deemed severe the treatment is surgical in nature and is performed in infancy with fronto-orbital advancement and cranial vault remodeling. At the time of this writing, there is no consensus regarding an objective evaluation system for severity, diagnostic criteria, or indications for surgery. This study aims to review the anthropometric cranial measurements and the relative diagnostic criteria/classification of severity/surgical indications proposed so far for this skull malformation, and to investigate if there is any scientific support for their utility.

Quantifying Orthotic Correction of Trigonocephaly Using Optical Surface Scanning

ABSTRACT

Numerous publications describe techniques to measure trigonocephaly caused by metopic synostosis, but they are potentially hazardous for use in acquiring longitudinal data. Optical surface scanning technology can safely yield craniometrics but has not established a practical means for measuring objective morphological changes to trigonocephaly during the practical time constraints of a clinical visit. The purpose of this preliminary study was to evaluate a method for safely and repeatedly measuring frontal angle (FA) using technology available at multiple centers providing treatment with cranial remolding orthoses.Optical scans of infants who underwent endoscopic-assisted minimally-invasive craniectomy for repair of metopic synostosis with cranial remolding were retrospectively analyzed. A novel FA measurement technique "FA30" was developed based on repeatable, geometrically-related surface landmarks approximating the glabella and frontotemporali. Results were compared to a control group and categories of non-synostotic deformity. Inter-rater reliability was assessed for pre- and post-treatment scan measurements among separate clinicians.All trigonocephalic subjects (n = 5) had initial FA30 significantly lower than the control group and other cohorts (P < 0.001). During the course of orthotic cranial remolding following surgical release mean FA30 increased from 121.5° to 138.5° (P < 0.001), approaching the control group mean of 144.4°. Intraclass coefficient calculation showed high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.993, 95% confidence interval: 0.957-0.998, P < 0.001), which was supported with Bland-Altman analyses of agreement.Optical surface scanning may provide a safe, accurate, and repeatable means to measure FA. Increase in FA30 demonstrates correction of trigonocephaly. The method presented enables expeditious reporting of treatment progress to the infant's surgeon and parents, and has potential for use in optimizing treatment outcomes at multiple centers.

Photogrammetric evaluation of corrective surgery for trigonocephaly

The aim of this study was to capture preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up head shapes of male trigonocephaly patients who underwent fronto-orbital remodelling (FOR), using three-dimensional (3D) photography. Fifty-seven male infants with metopic synostosis operated on using standardized FOR during a 5-year period were included. All measurements were compared with those of an age-matched healthy control cohort (n = 253 for early postoperative comparison, n = 43 for the 1-year follow-up comparison) to determine the effect of FOR at 14 days and at 1 year post-surgery. Intracranial volume, frontal angle, nasofrontal angle, interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio, and inter-orbital distances were measured 1 day preoperatively, 14 days and 1 year postoperatively. Mean age at surgery was 9.7 ± 1.1 months. Prior to surgery, boys with metopic synostosis showed a reduced intracranial volume (-7.0%, P < 0.001), frontal angle (-10.2%, P < 0.001), interfrontoparietal-interparietal ratio (-4.9%, P < 0.01), and orbital distances (-6.5%, P < 0.001) compared to the reference group, but values did not differ significantly from the specific control group after surgery (all P> 0.05). This was consistent by the time of the follow-up examination. Corrective surgery should therefore aim to achieve volume expansion and correction of the deformity. Furthermore, 3D photogrammetry provides a valuable alternative to computed tomography scans in the diagnosis of metopic synostosis, significantly reducing the amount of radiation exposure to the brain.

Evolution of Cranioorbital Shape in Nonsyndromic, Muenke, and Saethre-Chotzen Bilateral Coronal Synostosis: A Case-Control Study of 2-Year Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to quantify change in cranioorbital morphology from presentation, after fronto-orbital advancement, and at 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

Volumetric, linear, and angular analyses were performed on computed tomographic scans of consecutive bilateral coronal synostosis patients. Comparisons were made across three time points, between syndromic and nonsyndromic cases, and against normal controls. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included: 11 were nonsyndromic, eight had Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, and six had Muenke syndrome. Total cranial volume was comparable to normal, age-matched control subjects before and 2 years after surgery despite an expansion during surgery. Axial and sagittal vector analyses showed advancement and widening of the lower forehead beyond control values with surgery and comparable anterior position, but increased width compared to controls at 2 years. Frontal bossing decreased with a drop in anterior cranial height and advanced lower forehead position. Middle vault height was not normalized and turricephaly persisted at follow-up. Posterior fossa volume remained lower at all three time points compared to control subjects. Supraorbital retrusion relative to anterior corneal position was overcorrected by surgery, with values comparable to those of control subjects at 2 years because of differential growth. There was no difference at 2 years between syndromic and nonsyndromic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Open fronto-orbital advancement successfully remodels the anterior forehead but requires overcorrection to be comparable to normal at 2 years. Although there are differences in syndromic cases at presentation, they do not result in significant morphometric differences on follow-up. Posterior fossa volume remains lower at all time points.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Three-dimensional photography for intraoperative morphometric analysis in metopic craniosynostosis surgery

PURPOSE

Surgical correction of metopic craniosynostosis typically involves open cranial vault remodeling. Accurate translation of the virtual surgical plan into the operating room is challenging due to the lack of tools for intraoperative analysis of the surgical outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using a hand-held 3D photography device for intraoperative evaluation and guidance during cranial vault surgical reconstruction.

METHODS

A hand-held structured light scanner was used for intraoperative 3D photography during five craniosynostosis surgeries, obtaining 3D models of skin and bone surfaces before and after the remodeling. The accuracy of this device for 3D modeling and morphology quantification was evaluated using preoperative computed tomography imaging as gold-standard. In addition, the time required for intraoperative 3D photograph acquisition was measured.

RESULTS

The average error of intraoperative 3D photography was 0.30 mm. Moreover, the interfrontal angle and the transverse forehead width were accurately measured in the 3D photographs with an average error of 0.72 degrees and 0.62 mm. Surgeon's feedback indicates that this technology can be integrated into the surgical workflow without substantially increasing surgical time.

CONCLUSION

Hand-held 3D photography is an accurate technique for objective quantification of intraoperative cranial vault morphology and guidance during metopic craniosynostosis surgical reconstruction. This noninvasive technique does not substantially increase surgical time and does not require exposure to ionizing radiation, presenting a valuable alternative to computed tomography imaging. The proposed methodology can be integrated into the surgical workflow to assist during cranial vault remodeling and ensure optimal surgical outcomes.

Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry in the Evaluation of Craniosynostosis: Current and Potential Use Cases

ABSTRACT

Three-dimensional (3D) stereophotogrammetry is a novel imaging technique that has gained popularity in the medical field as a reliable, non-invasive, and radiation-free imaging modality. It uses optical sensors to acquire multiple 2D images from different angles which are reconstructed into a 3D digital model of the subject's surface. The technique proved to be especially useful in craniofacial applications, where it serves as a tool to overcome the limitations imposed by conventional imaging modalities and subjective evaluation methods. The capability to acquire high-dimensional data in a quick and safe manner and archive them for retrospective longitudinal analyses, provides the field with a methodology to increase the understanding of the morphological development of the cranium, its growth patterns and the effect of different treatments over time.This review describes the role of 3D stereophotogrammetry in the evaluation of craniosynostosis, including reliability studies, current and potential clinical use cases, and practical challenges. Finally, developments within the research field are analyzed by means of bibliometric networks, depicting prominent research topics, authors, and institutions, to stimulate new ideas and collaborations in the field of craniofacial 3D stereophotogrammetry.We anticipate that utilization of this modality's full potential requires a global effort in terms of collaborations, data sharing, standardization, and harmonization. Such developments can facilitate larger studies and novel deep learning methods that can aid in reaching an objective consensus regarding the most effective treatments for patients with craniosynostosis and other craniofacial anomalies, and to increase our understanding of these complex dysmorphologies and associated phenotypes.

Imaging in craniosynostosis: when and what?

PURPOSE

Currently, the interest on craniosynostosis in the clinical practice is raised by their increased frequency and their genetic implications other than by the still existing search of less invasive surgical techniques. These reasons, together with the problem of legal issues, make the need of a definite diagnosis for a crucial problem, even in single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC). Although the diagnosis of craniosynostosis is primarily the result of physical examination, craniometrics measuring, and observation of the skull deformity, the radiological assessment currently plays an important role in the confirmation of the diagnosis, the surgical planning, and even the postoperative follow-up. On the other hand, in infants, the use of radiation or the need of sedation/anesthesia raises the problem to reduce them to minimum to preserve such a delicate category of patient from their adverse effects.

METHODS, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

This review aims at summarizing the state of the art of the role of radiology in craniosynostosis, mainly focusing on indications and techniques, to provide an update not only to pediatric neurosurgeons or maxillofacial surgeons but also to all the other specialists involved in their management, like neonatologists, pediatricians, clinical geneticists, and pediatric neurologists.

3D morphological change of skull base and fronto-temporal soft-tissue in the patients with unicoronal craniosynostosis after fronto-orbital advancement

PURPOSE

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the deformation of the skull base and fronto-temporal soft tissue in the patients with anterior plagiocephaly over 1 year of age by three-dimensional (3D) imaging after fronto-orbital advancement (FOA).

METHODS

We quantitatively analyzed the surgical results and outcome of FOA performed in 10 patients with anterior plagiocephaly. The measurements of the skull base and fronto-temporal soft tissue were performed based on 3D computed tomography (CT) scan. We assessed symmetry of the skull base and fronto-temporal soft tissue change.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients at FOA was 38.9 months. A significant asymmetry of the skull base was found in all the patients. The growth of the anterior and middle fossae was restricted and the deformation of the fronto-temporal region was marked by soft tissue measurements in different grades. On the follow-up CT images 23.6 months after surgery, there was prominent change (p < 0.05) between the two hemibases (CSO^ ratio) and between the lengths and angles of the anterior and middle cranial hemi-fossae (CX, CSX^, XSM^, XM ratio), especially in grade IIA. Anterior cranial vault asymmetry index obviously decreased to - 1.2 from 12% after surgery (p < 0.05). What's more, ACA^ was also proved to be less after surgical correction (19.91° versus 8.29°, p < 0.01) in grade IIA. The change of fronto-temporal soft tissue was significant such as the frontal angle, the angle of the frontal plane, the fontal-temporal angle, and the angle of the temporal plane in different grades.

CONCLUSIONS

The asymmetry of the skull base and the deformation of the fronto-temporal region can be presented by intracranial view at over 1 year of age in different grades. FOA can correct the skeletal malformation of the fronto-temporal region as well as soft tissue and the asymmetry of the skull base was improved after surgical treatment.

Three-dimensional study of 31 cases of synostotic anterior plagiocephaly before and after surgical management the Lille protocol

Synostotic anterior plagiocephaly is a rare pathological cranial malformation. Therapeutic options are rarely studied due to the rarity of the malformation and difficulties in diagnosis and care management. The objective of this study was to analyze the results obtained with the Lille protocol based on 62 CT-scans done before and after surgery in 31 patients. A specific analysis was designed for this work. Nine cephalometric measures enabled to evidence on each CT-Scan the corrections made on the fronto-orbital bandeau and the potential impact of surgery on the craniofacial structures. Results show that surgical symmetry of the fronto-orbital bandeau in the transversal plane, according to the symmetrical axis of the semicircular canals, allows a normalization of the skull's growth and morphogenesis for the surgically affected structures but also adjacent ones.

CT Imaging Findings after Craniosynostosis Reconstructive Surgery

Several surgical options are available for treating the different types of craniosynostosis, including fronto-orbital advancement and remodeling, total or subtotal cranial vault remodeling, barrel stave osteotomy with cranial remodeling, endoscopic suturectomy, monobloc advancement and cranioplasty, and revision cranioplasty. High-resolution, low-dose CT with 3D reconstructed images and volumetric analysis can be useful for evaluating the craniofacial skeleton following surgery. The various types of craniosynostosis surgery and corresponding imaging findings are reviewed in this article.