Invasive candidiasis treated in the intensive care unit: observations from a randomized clinical trial

Understanding clinical outcomes and factors influencing mortality in intensive care unit patients with COVID-19-associated candidemia

BACKGROUND

During the COVID pandemic, research has shown an increase in candidemia cases following severe COVID infection and the identification of risk factors associated with candidemia. However, there is a lack of studies that specifically explore clinical outcomes and mortality rates related to candidemia after COVID infection.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this international study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and identify factors influencing mortality in patients who developed candidemia during their COVID infection.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This study included adult patients (18 years of age or older) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and diagnosed with COVID-associated candidemia (CAC). The research was conducted through ID-IRI network and in collaboration with 34 medical centres across 18 countries retrospectively, spanning from the beginning of the COVID pandemic until December 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 293 patients diagnosed with CAC were included. The median age of the patients was 67, and 63% of them were male. The most common Candida species detected was C. albicans. The crude 30-day mortality rate was recorded at 62.4%. The logistic regression analysis identified several factors significantly impacting mortality, including age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.07, p < .0005), SOFA score (OR 1.307, 95% CI 1.17-1.45, p < .0005), invasive mechanical ventilation (OR 7.95, 95% CI 1.44-43.83, p < .017) and duration of mechanical ventilation (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-0.99, p < .020).

CONCLUSIONS

By recognising these prognostic factors, medical professionals can customise their treatment approaches to offer more targeted care, leading to improved patient outcomes and higher survival rates for individuals with COVID-associated candidemia.

Impact of microbiome-based interventions on gastrointestinal pathogen colonization in the intensive care unit

In the intensive care unit (ICU), colonization of the gastrointestinal tract by potentially pathogenic bacteria is common and often precedes clinical infection. Though effective in the short term, traditional antibiotic-based decolonization methods may contribute to rising resistance in the long term. Novel therapies instead focus on restoring gut microbiome equilibrium to achieve pathogen colonization resistance. This review summarizes the existing data regarding microbiome-based approaches to gastrointestinal pathogen colonization in ICU patients with a focus on prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics.

Systematic review on the first line treatment of amphotericin B in critically ill adults with candidemia or invasive candidiasis

INTRODUCTION

Invasive candidiasis is the most common fungal infection affecting critically ill adults. International guidelines provide differing recommendations for first-line antifungal therapy, with echinocandins considered first-line in the majority. Amphotericin B has broad activity and low minimum inhibitory concentration resistance patterns across most Candida species and guidance away from its use should be supported by the available evidence. Areas Covered: A systematic literature review was conducted from August to September 2017 to determine whether treatment with echinocandins or other available drugs, namely voriconazole, confers a therapeutic or survival benefit over amphotericin B in critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis. Inclusion criteria were: (1) studies describing critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis, (2) studies describing therapeutic benefit or survival as an outcome, and (3) studies comparing amphotericin B, deoxycholate or lipid preparations, with any newer antifungal agent. Eight studies were included in the final review, incorporating 2352 unique patients. No difference in treatment efficacy or mortality outcomes in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis receiving an amphotericin B formulation compared with those receiving an echinocandin or voriconazole was shown. Expert Commentary: We conclude that in the existing literature, there is no evidence that choice between echinocandins, voriconazole, or amphotericin B formulations as first-line therapy for critically ill adults with invasive candidiasis is associated with a therapeutic or survival benefit. Clinicians must therefore consider other factors in the selection of first-line therapy.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Multiplex PCR with Magnetic Resonance Detection versus Empiric or Blood Culture-Directed Therapy for Management of Suspected Candidemia

Candida bloodstream infections (BSI) are associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased health care costs. Early treatment is essential, because delayed therapy detrimentally impacts clinical outcomes. The FDA recently approved the first culture-independent direct molecular detection method for Candida BSIs (T2Candida). The speed and sensitivity of this assay give it the potential to improve patient care, but the reagents and instrumentation are expensive. We used an analytic decision tree model to compare the cost-effectiveness of T2Candida-directed antifungal therapy (T2DT) to that of either empirical therapy (ET) or blood culture-directed therapy (BCDT). The costs included those of T2Candida testing, antifungal treatment, and hospital length of stay. The effectiveness measure was survival status at hospital discharge. T2DT was less costly and more effective than BCDT but was less costly and less effective than ET with an echinocandin (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $111,084 per additional survivor). One-way sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the cost-effectiveness of T2DT was highly dependent on Candida BSI prevalence and the cost of antifungal therapy and T2Candida test reagents. The use of T2DT reduced the number of unnecessarily treated patients by 98% relative to that with ET. Reduced drug exposure might lessen the possibility of drug-related adverse events and may also prevent the development of antifungal resistance or emergence of drug-resistant Candida species. The greatest benefit of T2Candida appears to be the ability to confidently withhold or stop empirical antifungal therapy in low-to-moderate-risk patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment.

Nosocomial candidemia; risk factors and prognosis revisited; 11 years experience from a Norwegian secondary hospital

The aim of the study was to review the epidemiology and prognosis of candidemia in a secondary hospital, and to examine the intra-hospital distribution of candidemia patients. Study design is a retrospective cohort study. Trough 2002–2012, 110 cases of candidemia were diagnosed, giving an incidence of 2, 6/100000 citizens/year. Overall prognosis of candidemia was dismal, with a 30 days case fatality rate of 49% and one year case fatality rate of 64%. Candidemia was a terminal event in 55% of 30 days non-survivors, defined as Candida blood cultures reported positive on the day of death or thereafter (39%), or treatment refrained due to hopeless short-term prognosis (16%). In terminal event candidemias, advanced or incurable cancer was present in 29%. Non-survivors at 30 days were 9 years (median) older than survivors. In 30 days survivors, candidemia was not recognised before discharge in 13% of cases. No treatment were given and no deaths or complications were observed in this group. Candidemia patients were grouped into 8 patient categories: Abdominal surgery (35%), urology (13%), other surgery (11%), pneumonia (13%), haematological malignancy (7%), intravenous drug abuse (4%), other medical (15%), and new-borns (3%). Candidemia was diagnosed while admitted in the ICU in 46% of patients. Urology related cases were all diagnosed in the general ward. Multiple surgical procedures were done in 60% of abdominal surgery patients. Antibiotics were administered prior to candidemia in 87% of patients, with median duration 17 (1–108) days. Neutropenia was less common than expected in patients with candidemia (8/105) and closely associated to haematological malignancy (6/8). Compared with previous national figures the epidemiology of invasive candidiasis seems not to have changed over the last decade.

How to select an antifungal agent in critically ill patients

Fungal infections are common in critically ill patients and are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Candida spp are the most commonly isolated fungal pathogens. The last 2 decades have seen an increased incidence of fungal infections in critical illness and the emergence of new pathogenic fungal species and also the development of more effective (better bioavailability) and safer (less toxicity, fewer drug interactions) drugs. The distinction between colonization and infection can be difficult, and problems diagnosing infection may delay initiation of antifungal treatment. A number of factors have been identified that can help to distinguish patients at high risk for fungal infection. The antifungal agents that are most frequently used in the intensive care unit are the first- and second-generation azoles and the echinocandins; amphotericin B derivatives (mainly the liposomal agents) are less widely used because of adverse effects. The choice of antifungal agent in critically ill patients will depend on the aim of therapy (prophylaxis, pre-emptive, empiric, definitive), as well as on local epidemiology and specific properties of the drug (antifungal spectrum, efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties, cost). In this article we will review all these aspects and propose an algorithm to guide selection of antifungal agents in critically ill patients.

Molecular typing of Candida albicans isolates from hospitalized patients

SUMMARY

Introduction: The majority of nosocomial fungal infections are caused by Candida spp. where C. albicans is the species most commonly identified. Molecular methods are important tools for assessing the origin of the yeasts isolated in hospitals.

Methods: This is a study on the genetic profifiles of 39 nosocomial clinical isolates of C. albicans using two typing methods: random amplifified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and microsatellite, two different primers for each technique were used.

Results: RAPD provided 10 and 11 different profiles with values for S_AB of 0.84 ± 0.126 and 0.88 ± 0.08 for primers M2 and P4, respectively. Microsatellite using two markers, CDC3 and HIS3, allowed the observation of six and seven different alleles, respectively, with combined discriminatory power of 0.91.

Conclusions: Although genetic variability is clear, it was possible to identify high similarity, suggesting a common origin for at least a part of isolates. It is important to emphasize that common origin was proven from yeasts isolated from colonization (urine, catheter or endotracheal secretions) and blood culture from the same patient, indicating that the candidemia must have started from a site of colonization. The combination of RAPD and microsatellite provides a quick and efficient analysis for investigation of similarity among nosocomial isolates of C. albicans.

[Antifungal treatment options in the critically ill patient]

Invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, have become an excellent target for prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions due to their associated high morbidity, mortality rate, increased incidence, and healthcare costs. For these reasons, new studies and laboratory tests have been developed over the last few years in order to formulate an early therapeutic intervention strategy in an attempt to reduce the high mortality rate associated with these infections. In recent years, evidence-based studies have shown the roles that the new antifungal drugs play in the treatment of invasive mycosis in seriously ill and complex patients, although data from critically ill patients are more limited. New antifungal agents have been analyzed in different clinical situations in critical care units, and the increasing number of non-Candida albicans species suggest that the application of early echinocandin therapy in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis is a good option. Voriconazole should be recommended for invasive aspergillosis as a first line option.

Pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in critically ill patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis

The pharmacokinetics of intravenous anidulafungin in adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients were assessed in this study and compared with historical data from a general patient population and healthy subjects. Intensive plasma sampling was performed over a dosing interval at steady state from 21 ICU patients with candidemia/invasive candidiasis. All patients received the recommended dosing regimen (a 200-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by a daily 100-mg maintenance dose), except for a 54-year-old 240-kg female patient (who received a daily 150-mg maintenance dose instead). Plasma samples were assayed for anidulafungin using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters in ICU patients were calculated by a noncompartmental method. With the exclusion of the 240-kg patient, the median (minimum, maximum) age, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of 20 ICU patients were 57 (39, 78) years, 65 (48, 106) kg, and 23.3 (16.2, 33.8) kg/m(2), respectively. The average anidulafungin area under the curve over the 24-hour dosing interval (AUC(0-24)), maximum concentration (C(max)), and clearance (CL) in 20 ICU patients were 92.7 mg · h/liter, 7.7 mg/liter, and 1.3 liters/h, respectively. The exposure in the 240-kg patient at a daily 150-mg dose was within the range observed in ICU patients overall. The average AUC(0-24) and Cmax in the general patient population and healthy subjects were 110.3 and 105.9 mg · h/liter and 7.2 and 7.0 mg/liter, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients appeared to be comparable to those in the general patient population and healthy subjects at the same dosing regimen.

[Invasive fungal infection in critically ill patients]

The most common organism implicated in fungal infections in the critically ill patients is Candida spp. C. albicans continues to be the species that causes the largest number of invasive candidiasis. In critically ill patients, Candida spp. are frequently isolated in non-sterile sites. Candida colonization is documented in nearly 60% of non-neutropenic critically ill patients staying more than one week in the ICU. However, only 5% of colonized patients will develop invasive candidiasis. The diagnosis of invasive non-candidemic candidiasis remains elusive in the majority of the patients. Candida in a blood culture should never be viewed as a contaminant and should always prompt treatment initiation. Patients with multifocal colonization with a Candida score >3 should also receive antifungal therapy. Fluconazole is reserved for non-severely ill patients without recent exposure to azoles. The use of an echinocandin is recommended for hemodynamically unstable patients or with a history of recent fluconazole exposure.

Anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis in selected critically ill patients

A prospective, multicentre, phase IIIb study with an exploratory, open-label design was conducted to evaluate efficacy and safety of anidulafungin for the treatment of candidaemia/invasive candidiasis (C/IC) in specific ICU patient populations. Adult ICU patients with confirmed C/IC meeting ≥1 of the following criteria were enrolled: post-abdominal surgery, solid tumour, renal/hepatic insufficiency, solid organ transplant, neutropaenia, and age ≥65 years. Patients received anidulafungin (200 mg on day 1, 100 mg/day thereafter) for 10–42 days, optionally followed by oral voriconazole/fluconazole. The primary efficacy endpoint was global (clinical and microbiological) response at the end of all therapy (EOT). Secondary endpoints included global response at the end of intravenous therapy (EOIVT) and at 2 and 6 weeks post-EOT, survival at day 90, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The primary efficacy analysis was performed in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population, excluding unknown/missing responses. The safety and MITT populations consisted of 216 and 170 patients, respectively. The most common pathogens were Candida albicans (55.9%), C. glabrata (14.7%) and C. parapsilosis (10.0%). Global success was 69.5% (107/154; 95% CI, 61.6–76.6) at EOT, 70.7% (111/157) at EOIVT, 60.2% (77/128) at 2 weeks post-EOT, and 50.5% (55/109) at 6 weeks post-EOT. When unknown/missing responses were included as failures, the respective success rates were 62.9%, 65.3%, 45.3% and 32.4%. Survival at day 90 was 53.8%. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 33/216 (15.3%) patients, four (1.9%) of whom had serious AEs. Anidulafungin was effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of C/IC in selected groups of ICU patients.

Multidisciplinary approach to the treatment of invasive fungal infections in adult patients. Prophylaxis, empirical, preemptive or targeted therapy, which is the best in the different hosts?

The high morbidity, mortality, and health care costs associated with invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting and immunocompromised host, have made it an excellent target for prophylactic, empiric, and preemptive therapy interventions principally based on early identification of risk factors. Early diagnosis and treatment are associated with a better prognosis. In the last years there have been important developments in antifungal pharmacotherapy. An approach to the new diagnosis tools in the clinical mycology laboratory and an analysis of the use new antifungal agents and its application in different clinical situations has been made. Furthermore, an attempt of developing a state of the art in each clinical scenario (critically ill, hematological, and solid organ transplant patients) has been performed, trying to choose the best strategy for each clinical situation (prophylaxis, pre-emptive, empirical, or targeted therapy). The high mortality rates in these settings make mandatory the application of early de-escalation therapy in critically ill patients with fungal infection. In addition, the possibility of antifungal combination therapy might be considered in solid organ transplant and hematological patients.

Anidulafungin compared with fluconazole in severely ill patients with candidemia and other forms of invasive candidiasis: support for the 2009 IDSA treatment guidelines for candidiasis

Introduction

During the past decade, the incidence of Candida infections in hospitalized patients has increased, with fluconazole being the most commonly prescribed systemic antifungal agent for these infections. However, the 2009 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) candidiasis guidelines recommend an echinocandin for the treatment of candidemia/invasive candidiasis in patients who are considered to be "moderately severe or severely" ill. To validate these guidelines, clinical trial data were reviewed.

Methods

A secondary analysis of data from a previously published prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial was performed; it compared anidulafungin with fluconazole for the treatment of invasive candidiasis and candidemia. Patients with critical illness were identified at study entry by using the following criteria: Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score of ≥ 15, evidence of severe sepsis (sepsis and one or more end-organ dysfunctions) present, and/or patient was in intensive care. Global response rates were compared at the end of intravenous study treatment (the primary end point of the original study) and all-cause mortality at 14 and 28 days from study entry in this group.

Results

The patients (163 (66.5%) of 245) fulfilled at least one criterion for critical illness (anidulafungin, n = 89; fluconazole, n = 74). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. The global response rate was 70.8% for anidulafungin and 54.1% for fluconazole (P = 0.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0 to 31.5); all-cause mortality was 10.1% versus 20.3% at 14 days (P = 0.08; 95% CI, -0.9 to 21.3) and was 20.2% versus 24.3% at 28 days (P = 0.57; 95% CI, -8.8 to 17.0) for anidulafungin and fluconazole, respectively.

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis, anidulafungin was more effective than fluconazole for treatment of severely ill patients with candidemia, thus supporting the 2009 IDSA guidelines.

Trial registration

Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00058682.

Diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in the ICU

Invasive candidiasis ranges from 5 to 10 cases per 1,000 ICU admissions and represents 5% to 10% of all ICU-acquired infections, with an overall mortality comparable to that of severe sepsis/septic shock. A large majority of them are due to Candida albicans, but the proportion of strains with decreased sensitivity or resistance to fluconazole is increasingly reported. A high proportion of ICU patients become colonized, but only 5% to 30% of them develop an invasive infection. Progressive colonization and major abdominal surgery are common risk factors, but invasive candidiasis is difficult to predict and early diagnosis remains a major challenge. Indeed, blood cultures are positive in a minority of cases and often late in the course of infection. New nonculture-based laboratory techniques may contribute to early diagnosis and management of invasive candidiasis. Both serologic (mannan, antimannan, and betaglucan) and molecular (Candida-specific PCR in blood and serum) have been applied as serial screening procedures in high-risk patients. However, although reasonably sensitive and specific, these techniques are largely investigational and their clinical usefulness remains to be established. Identification of patients susceptible to benefit from empirical antifungal treatment remains challenging, but it is mandatory to avoid antifungal overuse in critically ill patients. Growing evidence suggests that monitoring the dynamic of Candida colonization in surgical patients and prediction rules based on combined risk factors may be used to identify ICU patients at high risk of invasive candidiasis susceptible to benefit from prophylaxis or preemptive antifungal treatment.

[Update: invasive fungal infections: Diagnosis and treatment in surgical intensive care medicine]

Fungal infections are of great relevance in surgical intensive care and Candida species represent the predominant part of fungal pathogens. Invasive aspergillosis is also relevant especially in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases. It is crucial for therapy success to begin adequate antifungal treatment at an early stage of the disease. Risk stratification of individual patient symptoms is essential for therapy timing. In case of suspected or proven candida infection, fluconazole is the agent of choice when the patient is clinically stable and no azoles have been administrated in advance and the local epidemiology makes azol resistance unlikely. For clinically instable patients with organ dysfunction the echinocandins serve as primary therapy because of their broad spectrum and reasonable safety profile. Due to a relevant proportion of azole resistant Candida species, susceptibility testing should be done routinely. Depending on the species detected de-escalating to an azole is feasible if organ dysfunctions have resolved. An invasive aspergillosis is primarily treated with voriconazole.

Design and use of Candida scores at the intensive care unit

Invasive Candida infections are recognised as a cause of increased morbidity and mortality in intensive care patients, particularly those with recent extensive gastroabdominal surgery. Due to the difficulties of diagnosis, several authors have analysed risk factors suggestive of invasive candidiasis to identify patients at highest risk. Such patients may be potential candidates for preemptive antifungal therapy before becoming seriously ill. The extent of body site colonisation due to Candida species was recognised to be related with consequent invasive disease. The quantification of the colonisation was expressed as the Candida colonisation index. Based on the evaluation of independent risk factors predictive of invasive Candida infections, clinically relevant scores were evaluated in the last decade. Particularly, the Candida score that combines the clinical risk factors preceding surgery, total parenteral nutrition and severe sepsis with Candida multi-site colonisation can be considered a useful bedside scoring system to discern patients with mere Candida colonisation from patients with the risk of invasive candidiasis in non-neutropaenic critically ill patient population.

[Guidelines for the treatment of Invasive Candidiasis and other yeasts. Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC). 2010 Update]

These guidelines are an update of the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) that were issued in 2004 (Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2004, 22:32-9) on the treatment of Invasive Candidiasis and infections produced by other yeasts. This 2010 update includes a comprehensive review of the new drugs that have appeared in recent years, as well as the levels of evidence for recommending them. These guidelines have been developed following the rules of the SEIMC by a working group composed of specialists in infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, critical care medicine, paediatrics and oncology-haematology. It provides a series of general recommendations regarding the management of invasive candidiasis and other yeast infections, as well as specific guidelines for prophylaxis and treatment, which have been divided into four sections: oncology-haematology, solid organ transplantation recipients, critical patients, and paediatric patients.

[Caspofungin after solid organ transplantation in Germany: observational study on treatment of invasive fungal infections]

BACKGROUND

This study was a pre-planned country-specific secondary analysis of results in Germany from a multinational multicenter observational study to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes with caspofungin in patients with probable and proven invasive fungal infection following solid organ transplantation (SOT).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected on a single episode of invasive fungal infection (IFI) in patients who had a SOT between January 2004 and June 2007. Effectiveness was reported as the proportion of patients who received at least five doses of caspofungin with a favorable (complete or partial) response. Safety was assessed for patients who received at least one dose of caspofungin. Descriptive statistics were employed for all evaluations.

RESULTS

A total of 41 SOT patients (27 male, 14 female; median age 56 years, median APACHE II score at start of caspofungin therapy 23) were enrolled from 5 sites in Germany. Organs transplanted were mainly heart (51%) and liver (46%). Prevalent risk factors for IFI at baseline were use of central venous catheter (37 out of 41 patients, 90%), steroid use (37 out of 41 patients, 90%), recent stay in intensive care (36 out of 41 patients, 88%),and duration of SOT procedure >5 hours (21 out of 41 patients, 51%). Candidiasis was diagnosed in 34 patients (83%) and aspergillosis in 10 patients (24%). The lungs were the most common site of IFI (21 out of 41, 51%). Caspofungin as monotherapy was received by 28 patients (68%); 6 patients (15%) received caspofungin as salvage therapy for IFI, in most cases because they were refractory to prior antifungal drugs. Immunosuppressants were administered with caspofungin in 39 out of 41 patients (95%). In subjects with at least 5 doses of caspofungin (modified intention to treat population) the favorable response rate at the end of caspofungin therapy was 88% overall, 29 out of 33 patients; 95% confidence interval (95%-CI) 72-97%), 86% (19 out of 22 patients) with monotherapy and 91% (10 out of 11 patients) with combination therapy. No (serious) adverse events or drug interactions related to treatment with caspofungin were reported. The overall survival rate was 79% (26 out of 33 patients; 95%-CI 61-91%) at 7 days after completion of caspofungin treatment.

CONCLUSION

Caspofungin was found to be an effective treatment of probable and proven invasive fungal infections in patients following SOT in Germany.

Invasive fungal infections in the ICU

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Foremost among these is invasive candidiasis. In recent years, invasive aspergillosis (IA) and zygomycosis have emerged as major problems in susceptible, critically ill patients. Risk factors for invasive fungal infections, including disrupted anatomic barriers, suppressed antifungal host responses, and exposure to potentially opportunistic fungi are common in critically ill patients. The expanded antifungal armamentarium and advent of rapid diagnostic techniques are altering the approach to invasive fungal infections in the intensive care unit (ICU). Herein, we review recent developments in the field of antifungal host defenses, the changing epidemiology of fungal infections in the ICU, the pharmacology of antifungal agents of importance to critically ill patients, and the evolving approaches to therapy in this setting.

Treatment of candidemia and invasive candidiasis in the intensive care unit: post hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial comparing micafungin and liposomal amphotericin B

Introduction

Invasive candidiasis and candidemia are life-threatening nosocomial infections in intensive care patients.

Methods

A post hoc analysis of a phase 3 trial assessing micafungin (100 mg/day for subjects > 40 kg; 2 mg/kg/day for subjects ≤ 40 kg) versus liposomal amphotericin B (3 mg/kg/day). Subgroups were defined according to the type of ward on the first day of treatment: intensive care unit (ICU) or non-ICU. Multivariate regression was performed to identify factors associated with treatment success at end of therapy and all-cause mortality at days 8 and 30.

Results

In non-ICU subjects, treatment success was significantly higher for micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (85% (n = 108/127) versus 72.1% (n = 98/136); P = 0.0113). However, for ICU subjects, treatment success rates for micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B were similar (62.5% (n = 75/120) versus 66.4% (n = 73/110); P = 0.5828). Overall, treatment success was significantly lower in ICU subjects compared with non-ICU subjects (64.3% (n = 148/230) versus 78.3% (n = 206/263); P = 0.0006). Multivariate regression analysis revealed a lower likelihood of treatment success for: ICU versus non-ICU subjects; persistent neutropenia; and high versus low Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores. However, when interactions between potential explanatory factors were included in the analysis model, ICU status no longer emerged as a significant associated variable but the association between APACHE II score and treatment outcome remained. Further analyses indicated that the likelihood of mortality at day 8 and day 30 was lower for subjects with lower APACHE II scores. Renal function was significantly better in micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B subjects: a difference (liposomal amphotericin B - micafungin in mean peak change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (ml/minute/1.73 m²) of -18.2 (P < 0.0001) and -17.7 (P = 0.0124) in non-ICU and ICU subjects, respectively.

Conclusions

Overall, ICU subjects had lower treatment success rates than non-ICU subjects for both liposomal amphotericin B and micafungin. Multivariate regression after controlling for potential confounding factors suggested the APACHE II score remained a potential explanatory factor associated with treatment success, mortality at day 8, and mortality at day 30.

Trial registration

Post hoc analysis - clinicaltrials.gov trial NCT00106288.

[Current status of invasive fungal infections. New diagnostic techniques and antifungal agents]

In the last few years, major advances in the treatment of transplant recipients, with hemato-oncological diseases or admitted to the intensive care unit, has been accompanied by an increase in classical fungal infections and by the emergence of uncommon fungal infections. Despite the development of new diagnostic techniques such as galactomannan detection and the availability of new antifungal agents, these opportunistic infections continue to pose a diagnostic challenge, prolong length of hospital stay, and increase costs. In addition, mortality from these infections is high. The present chapter provides a brief review of the epidemiology of these infections, diagnostic advances, and the new antifungal agents that have been developed in the last few years.

Candida in the ICU

Invasive Candida infections are becoming increasingly recognized in critically ill patients. These infections result in serious morbidity, can be life threatening, and are expensive to manage. Early suspicion of Candida infection and the use of timely and proper antifungal treatment can improve outcome. Although treatment of documented, deep-seated Candida infections in nonneutropenic patients has been studied extensively, guidelines for the management of suspected but undocumented cases of invasive Candida infections in critically ill patients have not been clearly established. Future work should focus on better delineation of the sector of critically ill patients who have suspected invasive Candida infection and who could benefit from the use of empiric antifungal therapy, and on the investigation of novel approaches for the potential salvage of devices infected with Candida species.

[Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis in pediatric and adult populations]

BACKGROUND

Invasive candidiasis (IC) is the most frequent fungal disease in children and adults.

AIMS

To critically review and update the current epidemiology of Candida spp. disease in neonates, children and adults (critically ill patients and in oncohematologic patients and in solid organ transplant recipients).

METHODS

We searched the PubMed/Medline, discussing the current data.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

IC is associated with high attributable morbimortality and increased healthcare costs. In the last decades the incidence of invasive Candida spp. disease has increased in critically ill patients, has decreased in oncohematologic patients, although currently the involvement of non-albicans Candida species in the etiology of this disease is increasing steadily.

Update on the epidemiology and diagnosis of invasive fungal infection

In recent years, the most important advances in the treatment of transplant recipients, patients with haematological neoplasm and critically ill patients have been accompanied by an increase in the incidence of common fungal diseases and the emergence of some less common ones. Although new techniques (e.g. galactomannan detection) and new antifungals have appeared, these opportunistic infections remain difficult to diagnose and have a high mortality. New diagnostic techniques could improve this outlook, although they are far from becoming available in daily practice.

Management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in adult non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients: Part II. Treatment

BACKGROUND

Invasive candidiasis and candidemia are frequently encountered in the nosocomial setting particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU).

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

To review the current management of invasive candidiasis and candidemia in non-neutropenic adult ICU patients based on a review of the literature and an European expert panel discussion.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Empiric and directed treatment for invasive candidiasis are predicated on the hemodynamic status of the patient. Unstable patients may benefit from broad-spectrum antifungal agents, which can be narrowed once the patient has stabilized and the identity of the infecting species is established. In stable patients, a more classical approach using fluconazole may be satisfactory provided that the patient is not colonized with fluconazole resistant strains or there has been recent past exposure to an azole (<30 days). In contrast, pre-emptive therapy is based on the presence of surrogate markers.

New options for treatment of candidaemia in critically ill patients

Bloodstream infections caused by Candida spp. are increasingly recognised in critically ill adult and paediatric individuals, with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Candida albicans is the single most common fungal species to cause nosocomial infections. However, non-C. albicans spp., including Candida glabrata and Candida krusei, which are less susceptible to fluconazole, have become more common. Until the 1980s, the therapeutic possibilities for invasive candidosis were limited to amphotericin B, but with the advent of new antifungal agents, such as azoles and echinocandins, less toxic therapeutic options have become available and there are now possibilities for prevention and optimised therapy for documented Candida infections. In this review, the currently available options for the treatment of candidaemia and invasive candidosis are discussed with regard to the role of liposomal amphotericin B in comparison with the echinocandins and azoles.