Sex and gender aspects on intensive care. A cohort study

Risk factors for colonisation by Multidrug-Resistant bacteria in critical care units

INTRODUCTION

Antimicrobial resistance is a major public health challenge recognised by the WHO as an urgent global healthcare concern. Patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are particularly prone to colonisation and/or infection by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).

OBJECTIVES

Delineate the epidemiological characteristics and risk factors for MDROs colonisation in mixed ICUs and Resuscitation Units by focusing on initial and nosocomial colonisation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A descriptive observational study with analytical elements. It uses the Zero-Resistance register from the Preventive Medicine Service of the Albacete General University Hospital (Spain) from April 2016 to December 2021. It identifies the risk factors for MDROs colonisation.

RESULTS

Of 7,541 cases, 61.0 % with initial colonisation had risk factors for MDROs versus 34.0 % not colonised upon hospitalisation (p < 0.001). Significant risk factors for initial colonisation included hospitalisation for ≥ 5 days within the last 3 months, prior MDROs colonisation/infection and institutionalization. No significant risk factor differences were found for nosocomial colonisation. An association between longer ICU stays and nosocomial colonisation (p < 0.001) was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant risk factors for initial MDROs colonisation were hospitalisation for ≥ 5 days in the last 3 months, prior MDROs colonisation/infection and institutionalisation. Longer ICU stays increased the nosocomial colonisation risk.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study underscores the importance to early identify and manage patients at risk for MDROs colonisation in ICUs. By recognising factors (i.e. previous hospitalisations, existing colonisation or infection, impact of prolonged ICU stay), healthcare providers can implement targeted strategies to mitigate the spread of MDROs; e.g. enhanced surveillance, stringent infection control measures and judicious antibiotics use. Our findings highlight the need for a comprehensive approach to manage antimicrobial resistance in critical care settings to ultimately improve patient outcomes and reduce MDROs burden in hospitals.

Sex differences in the use of mechanical ventilation in a neurointensive care population: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

In the general intensive care unit (ICU) women receive invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) less frequently than men. We investigated whether sex differences in the use of IMV also exist in the neurocritical care unit (NCCU), where patients are intubated not only due to respiratory failure but also due to neurological impairment.

METHODS

This retrospective single-centre study included adults admitted to the NCCU of the University Hospital Zurich between January 2018 and August 2021 with neurological or neurosurgical main diagnosis. We collected data on demographics, intubation, re-intubation, tracheotomy, and duration of IMV or other forms of respiratory support from the Swiss ICU registry or the medical records. A descriptive statistics was performed. Baseline and outcome characteristics were compared by sex in the whole population and in subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 963 patients were included. No differences between sexes in the use and duration of IMV, frequency of emergency or planned intubations, tracheostomy were found. The duration of oxygen support was longer in women (men 2 [2, 4] vs. women 3 [1, 6] days, p = 0.018), who were more often admitted due to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). No difference could be found after correction for age, diagnosis of admission and severity of disease.

CONCLUSION

In this NCCU population and differently from the general ICU population, we found no difference by sex in the frequency and duration of IMV, intubation, reintubation, tracheotomy and non-invasive ventilation support. These results suggest that the differences in provision of care by sex reported in the general ICU population may be diagnosis-dependent. The difference in duration of oxygen supplementation observed in our population can be explained by the higher prevalence of SAH in women, where we aim for higher oxygenation targets due to the specific risk of vasospasm.

Gender perspective in the implementation of hygiene in cardiology intensive care

INTRODUCTION

Hygiene in critical patients is an essential daily care, provided under safe conditions, to promote comfort and maintain the integrity of skin and mucous membranes, however, it can generate feelings of dependence and vulnerability in patients. The aim of this post hoc study is to know the differences in satisfaction and lived experience regarding bed hygiene in an intensive care unit according to biological sex and gender perspective.

METHODS

Observational, descriptive and prospective study in which an ad hoc questionnaire was administered to 148 conscious and oriented patients of legal age. The questionnaire was completed 24-48 hours after admission to the unit, once the initial bed hygiene had been performed.

RESULTS

Males experienced conformism (51%), embarrassment (31%) and relief (9%); Women felt conformism (35.4%), embarrassment (18.8%) and relief (29.2%) (p < 0.05). Women experienced a feeling of cleanliness in 89.1% compared to 56.1% of men (p < 0.05). Men were offered to wash their genitals in 72.9% compared to 35.7% of women (p < 0.05). 34.3% of men would prefer a family member to assist them during hygiene (62.9% by their wives), compared to 27.1% of women who would prefer a family member (84.6% by their daughters).

CONCLUSION

Women tolerate bed hygiene better than men and appreciate more the feeling of cleanliness. Women are identified as caregivers, both professionally and in the family, and patients prefer them to collaborate in the performance of hygiene, being wives preferred by men and daughters preferred by women.

Epidemiological profile and risk factors associated with death in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation in an adult intensive care unit from Brazil: a retrospective study

Introduction

Understanding the epidemiological profile and risk factors associated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is essential to manage the patients better and to improve health services. Therefore, our objective was to describe the epidemiological profile of adult patients in intensive care that required IMV in-hospital treatment. Also, to evaluate the risks associated with death and the influence of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2) at admission in the clinical outcome.

Methods

We conducted an epidemiological study analyzing medical records of inpatients who received IMV from January 2016 to December 2019 prior to the Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19 pandemic in Brazil. We considered the following characteristics in the statistical analysis: demographic data, diagnostic hypothesis, hospitalization data, and PEEP and PaO2 during IMV. We associated the patients' features with the risk of death using a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis. We adopted an alpha error of 0.05.

Results

We analyzed 1,443 medical records; out of those, 570 (39.5%) recorded the patients' deaths. The binary logistic regression was significant in predicting the patients' risk of death [X2(9) = 288.335; p < 0.001]. Among predictors, the most significant in relation to death risk were: age [elderly ≥65 years old; OR = 2.226 (95%CI = 1.728-2.867)]; male sex (OR = 0.754; 95%CI = 0.593-0.959); sepsis diagnosis (OR = 1.961; 95%CI = 1.481-2.595); need for elective surgery (OR = 0.469; 95%CI = 0.362-0.608); the presence of cerebrovascular accident (OR = 2.304; 95%CI = 1.502-3.534); time of hospital care (OR = 0.946; 95%CI = 0.935-0.956); hypoxemia at admission (OR = 1.635; 95%CI = 1.024-2.611), and PEEP >8 cmH2O at admission (OR = 2.153; 95%CI = 1.426-3.250).

Conclusion

The death rate of the studied intensive care unit was equivalent to that of other similar units. Regarding risk predictors, several demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with enhanced mortality in intensive care unit patients under mechanical ventilation, such as diabetes mellitus, systemic arterial hypertension, and older age. The PEEP >8 cmH2O at admission was also associated with increased mortality since this value is a marker of initially severe hypoxia.

Nurse staffing levels in critical care: The impact of patient characteristics

BACKGROUND

Intensive care is one of the most resource-intensive forms of care because seriously ill patients are cared for in units with high staffing levels. Studies show that the number of registered nurses (RNs) per patient and nurse education level affects patient outcome. However, there is a lack of studies that consider how nurses/patient ratio with an advanced educational level of specialized nurses in intensive care, affect the intensive care performed in different patient populations.

AIM

To investigate if differences in patient characteristics and nurse-patient ratio have an impact on the quality of care.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective observational study with a review of all patients >15 years receiving care at two general intensive care units with different nurse/patient ratio (unit A, 1:1 nurse/patient ratio and unit B, 0.5:1 nurse/patient ratio).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the initial severity of illness between the units. However, younger patients, male patients and patients requiring surgery entailed a higher workload and a longer intensive care unit (ICU) stay despite a 1:1 critical care nurse/patient ratio. A small difference, but not significant, with more unplanned re-intubations occurred at unit A compared with unit B.

CONCLUSION

The differences in the nurse/patient ratio did not reflect a difference in the severity of illness among admitted patients but might be explained by patient characteristics with different needs.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Health care managers should consider not only the number of nurses but also their educational level, specific competencies and skills mix and nursing-sensitive measures to provide high-quality ICU care in settings with different patient characteristics. Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes should be considered in relation to nurse/patient ratio, as important to measure to ensure a high quality of patient care in the ICU.

Sex Differences in Mortality of ICU Patients According to Diagnosis-related Sex Balance

Rationale: Women have worse outcomes than men in several conditions more common in men, including cardiac surgery and burns. Objectives: To describe the relationship between sex balance within each diagnostic group of ICU admissions, defined as the percentage of patients who were women, and hospital mortality of women compared with men with that same diagnosis. Methods: We studied ICU patients in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society's Adult Patient Database (2011-2020). We performed mixed effects logistic regression for hospital mortality adjusted for sex, illness severity, ICU lead time, admission year, and hospital site. We compared sex balance with the adjusted hospital mortality of women compared with men for each diagnosis using weighted linear regression. Measurements and Main Results: There were 1,450,782 admissions (42.1% women), with no difference in the adjusted hospital mortality of women compared with men overall (odds ratio, 0.99; 99% confidence interval [CI], 0.97 to 1). As the percentage of women within each diagnosis increased, the adjusted mortality of women compared with men with that same diagnosis decreased (regression coefficient, -0.015; 99% CI; -0.020 to -0.011; P < 0.001), and the illness severity of women compared with men at ICU admission decreased (regression coefficient, -0.0026; 99% CI, -0.0035 to -0.0018; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Sex balance in diagnostic groups was inversely associated with both the adjusted mortality and illness severity of women compared with men. In diagnoses with relatively few women, women were more likely than men to die. In diagnoses with fewer men, men were more likely than women to die.

Sex-related differences in postoperative complications following elective craniotomy for intracranial lesions: An observational study

INTRODUCTION

The integration of sex-related differences in neurosurgery is crucial for new, possible sex-specific, therapeutic approaches. In neurosurgical emergencies, such as traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, these differences have been investigated. So far, little is known concerning the impact of sex on frequency of postoperative complications after elective craniotomy. This study investigates whether sex-related differences exist in frequency of postoperative complications in patients who underwent elective craniotomy for intracranial lesion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent an elective intracranial procedure over a 2-year period at our center were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Demographic data, comorbidities, frequency of postoperative complications at 24 hours following surgery and at discharge, and hospital length of stay were compared among females and males.

RESULTS

Overall, 664 patients were considered for the analysis. Of those, 339 (50.2%) were females. Demographic data were comparable among females and males. More females than males suffered from allergic, muscular, and rheumatic disorders. No differences in frequency of postoperative complications at 24 hours after surgery and at discharge were observed among females and males. Similarly, the hospital length of stay was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, no sex-related differences in frequency of early postoperative complications and at discharge following elective craniotomy for intracranial lesions were observed.

Sex Differences in Treatment of Adult Intensive Care Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and synthesize the available literature on sex differences in the treatment of adult ICU patients.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and EMBASE.

STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently screened publications to identify observational studies of adult ICU patients that explicitly examined the association between sex and ICU treatment-specifically, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and length of stay.

DATA EXTRACTION

We extracted data independently and in duplicate: mean age, illness severity, use of mechanical ventilation and renal replacement therapy, and length of stay in ICU and hospital. We assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We used a DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences between women and men.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We screened 4,098 publications, identifying 21 eligible studies with 545,538 participants (42.7% women). The study populations ranged from 246 to 261,255 participants (median 4,420). Most studies (76.2%) were at high risk of bias in at least one domain, most commonly representativeness or comparability. Women were less likely than men to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.77-0.89; I2 = 90.4%) or renal replacement therapy (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.90; I2 = 76.2%). ICU length of stay was shorter in women than men (mean difference, -0.24 d; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.12; I2 = 89.9%). These findings persisted in meta-analysis of data adjusted for illness severity and other confounders and also in sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias. There was no significant sex difference in duration of mechanical ventilation or hospital length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Women were less likely than men to receive mechanical ventilation or renal replacement therapy and had shorter ICU length of stay than men. There is substantial heterogeneity and risk of bias in the literature; however, these findings persisted in sensitivity analyses.

Recalibration and validation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index in acute kidney injury patients underwent continuous renal replacement therapy

Background

Comorbid conditions impact the survival of patients with severe acute kidney injury (AKI) who require continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). The weights assigned to comorbidities in predicting survival vary based on type of index, disease, and advances in management of comorbidities. We developed a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for use in patients with AKI requiring CRRT (mCCI-CRRT) and improved the accuracy of risk stratification for mortality.

Methods

A total of 828 patients who received CRRT between 2008 and 2013, from three university hospital cohorts was included to develop the comorbidity score. The weights of the comorbidities were recalibrated using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for demographic and clinical information. The modified index was validated in a university hospital cohort (n = 919) using the data of patients treated from 2009 to 2015.

Results

Weights for dementia, peptic ulcer disease, any tumor, and metastatic solid tumor were used to recalibrate the mCCI-CRRT. Use of these calibrated weights achieved a 35.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 22.1%–48.1%) higher performance than unadjusted CCI in reclassification based on continuous net reclassification improvement in logistic regression adjusted for age and sex. After additionally adjusting for hemoglobin and albumin, consistent results were found in risk reclassification, which improved by 35.9% (95% CI, 23.3%–48.5%).

Conclusion

The mCCI-CRRT stratifies risk of mortality in AKI patients who require CRRT more accurately than does the original CCI, suggesting that it could serve as a preferred index for use in clinical practice.

A cohort study investigating the occurrence of differences in care provided to men and women in an intensive care unit

It has been reported that there are differences in the care given within the intensive care unit (ICU) between men and women. The aim of this study is to investigate if any differences still exist between men and women regarding the level of intensive care provided, using prespecified intensive care items. This is a retrospective cohort study of 9017 ICU patients admitted to a university hospital between 2006 and 2016. Differences in use of mechanical ventilation, invasive monitoring, vasoactive treatment, inotropic treatment, echocardiography, renal replacement therapy and central venous catheters based on the sex of the patient were analysed using univariate and multivariable logistic regressions. Subgroup analyses were performed on patients diagnosed with sepsis, cardiac arrest and respiratory disease. Approximately one third of the patients were women. Overall, men received more mechanical ventilation, more dialysis and more vasoactive treatment. Among patients admitted with a respiratory disease, men were more likely to receive mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, men were more likely to receive levosimendan if admitted with cardiac arrest. We conclude that differences in the level of intensive care provided to men and women still exist.

Sex differences in illness severity and mortality among adult intensive care patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between sex and illness severity and mortality of ICU patients.

METHODS

We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE for observational studies of adult ICU patients that explicitly examined the association between sex and illness severity or mortality. We used a random effects model to calculate standardised mean differences in illness severity scores and pooled odds ratios for mortality of women compared to men.

RESULTS

We identified 21 studies with 505,138 participants in total (43.1% women). There was substantial heterogeneity among studies. Only two studies were at low risk of bias overall. At ICU admission, there was a pattern of higher illness severity scores among women (standardised mean difference 0.04, 95% CI -0.01-0.09). Women had higher risk-adjusted mortality than men at ICU discharge (OR 1.25 95% CI 1.03-1.50) and 1 year (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.13), however this finding was not robust to sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Women tend to have higher illness severity scores at ICU admission. Women also appear to have higher risk-adjusted mortality than men at ICU discharge and at 1 year. Given the heterogeneity and risk of bias in the existing literature, additional studies are needed to confirm or refute these findings.

Gender differences in the provision of intensive care: a Bayesian approach

Purpose

It is currently unclear whether management and outcomes of critically ill patients differ between men and women. We sought to assess the influence of age, sex and diagnoses on the probability of intensive care provision in critically ill cardio- and neurovascular patients in a large nationwide cohort in Switzerland.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of 450,948 adult patients with neuro- and cardiovascular disease admitted to all hospitals in Switzerland between 01/2012 and 12/2016 using Bayesian modeling.

Results

For all diagnoses and populations, median ages at admission were consistently higher for women than for men [75 (64;82) years in women vs. 68 (58;77) years in men, p < 0.001]. Overall, women had a lower likelihood to be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) than men, despite being more severely ill [odds ratio (OR) 0.78 (0.76–0.79)]. ICU admission probability was lowest in women aged > 65 years (OR women:men 0.94 (0.89–0.99), p < 0.001). Women < 45 years had a similar ICU admission probability as men in the same age category [OR women:men 1.03 (0.94–1.13)], in spite of more severe illness. The odds to die were significantly higher in women than in men per unit increase in Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II (OR 1.008 [1.004–1.012]).

Conclusion

In the care of the critically ill, our study suggests that women are less likely to receive ICU treatment regardless of disease severity. Underuse of ICU care was most prominent in younger women < 45 years. Although our study has several limitations that are imposed by the limited data available from the registries, our findings suggest that current ICU triage algorithms could benefit from careful reassessment. Further, and ideally prospective, studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06393-3.

Long-term outcome after intensive care for COVID-19: differences between men and women-a nationwide cohort study

Background

Questions remain about long-term outcome for COVID-19 patients in general, and differences between men and women in particular given the fact that men seem to suffer a more dramatic course of the disease. We therefore analysed outcome beyond 90 days in ICU patients with COVID-19, with special focus on differences between men and women.

Methods

We identified all patient ≥ 18 years with COVID-19 admitted between March 6 and June 30, 2020, in the Swedish Intensive Care Registry. Patients were followed until death or study end-point October 22, 2020. Association with patient sex and mortality, in addition to clinical variables, was estimated using Cox regression. We also performed a logistic regression model estimating factors associated with 90-day mortality.

Results

In total, 2354 patients with COVID-19 were included. Four patients were still in the ICU at study end-point. Median follow-up time was 183 days. Mortality at 90-days was 26.9%, 23.4% in women and 28.2% in men. After 90 days until end of follow-up, only 11 deaths occurred. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, male sex (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.06–1.54) remained significantly associated with mortality even after adjustments. Additionally, age, COPD/asthma, immune deficiency, malignancy, SAPS3 and admission month were associated with mortality. The logistic regression model of 90-day mortality showed almost identical results.

Conclusions

In this nationwide study of ICU patients with COVID-19, men were at higher risk of poor long-term outcome compared to their female counterparts. The underlying mechanisms for these differences are not fully understood and warrant further studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-021-03511-x.

Ketamine vs. haloperidol for prevention of cognitive dysfunction and postoperative delirium: A phase IV multicentre randomised placebo-controlled double-blind clinical trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Delirium is frequently observed in the postoperative and intensive care unit (ICU) population. Due to the multifactorial origin of delirium and according to international guidelines (e.g., American Geriatrics Society; Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption (PADIS) guideline), there are several but no incontestable options for prevention and symptomatic treatment. The purpose of the Baden PRIDe (Prevention and Reduction of Incidence of postoperative Delirium) trial was to determine whether postoperative cognitive dysfunction and delirium could be prevented by the combination of possible preventive agents such as haloperidol and ketamine. In addition, pre- and postoperative levels of the biomarkers cortisol, neuron specific enolase (NSE) and S100β were measured to investigate their dynamics in delirious and non-delirious patients after surgery.

DESIGN

The Baden PRIDe Trial was an investigator-initiated, phase IV, two-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

Perioperative care.

PATIENTS

182 adult patients that underwent elective or emergency surgery under general or combined (i.e., general and regional) anaesthesia.

INTERVENTIONS

Pre-anaesthetic, pharmacologic prevention of postoperative brain dysfunction with haloperidol, ketamine, and the combination of both vs. placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Assessment of cognitive performance pre- and postoperatively with the MMSE, the DOS, the Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) or the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) during ICU stay.

MAIN RESULTS

None of the three study arms - haloperidol, ketamine, or both drugs combined - was significantly superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative brain dysfunction and delirium (P = 0.39). Measured levels of postoperative cortisol were significantly higher in delirious patients. S-100β levels were significantly higher in all postoperative outcome groups (cognitive impairment, delirium, no cognitive decline), whereas postoperative NSE levels declined in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study results offer no possibility for a novel recommendation for prevention of postoperative cognitive decline including delirium. Perioperative S-100β trajectories in patients with cognitive deterioration suggest affection of glial cells in particular.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.govNCT02433041; registered on April 7, 2015.