Bilateral keratectasia after unilateral laser in situ keratomileusis: A retrospective diagnosis of ectatic corneal disorder

Ectasia After Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of ectasia following refractive surgery is unclear. This review sought to determine the worldwide rates of ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) based on reports in the literature.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Publications were identified by a search of eight electronic databases for relevant terms between 1984 and 2021. Patient characteristics and preoperative values including manifest refractive spherical refractive equivalent (MRSE), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior keratometry, postoperative residual stromal bed (RSB), and percent tissue altered (PTA) were summarized. In addition, annual rates of each refractive surgery were determined, and incidence of post-refractive ectasia for each type was calculated using the number of ectatic eyes identified in the literature.

RESULTS

In total, 57 eyes (70 eyes including those with preoperative risk factors for ectasia) were identified to have post-PRK ectasia, while 1453 eyes (1681 eyes including risk factors) had post-LASIK ectasia, and 11 eyes (19 eyes including risk factors) had post-SMILE ectasia. Cases of refractive surgery performed annually were estimated as 283,920 for PRK, 1,608,880 for LASIK, and 96,750 for SMILE. Reported post-refractive ectasia in eyes without preoperative identifiable risk factors occurred with the following incidences: 20 per 100,000 eyes in PRK, 90 per 100,000 eyes in LASIK, and 11 per 100,000 eyes in SMILE. The rate of ectasia in LASIK was found to be 4.5 times higher than that of PRK.

CONCLUSION

Post-refractive ectasia occurs at lower rates in eyes undergoing PRK than LASIK. Although SMILE appears to have the lowest rate of ectasia, the number of cases already reported since its recent approval suggests that post-SMILE ectasia may become a concern. Considering that keratoconus is a spectrum of disease, pre-existing keratoconus may play a larger role in postoperative ectasia than previously accounted for in the literature.

Tomographically normal partner eye in very asymmetrical corneal ectasia: biomechanical analysis

PURPOSE

To point out the biomechanical changes of the topographically and tomographically normal partner eye (NPE) in patients with very asymmetrical corneal ectasia.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center in Homburg/Saar, Germany.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

METHODS

The topographical and tomographical results of the NPE were assessed using the Pentacam HR and the biomechanical corneal properties using the Ocular Response Analyzer (keratoconus match index [KMI], corneal hysteresis [CH], and corneal resistance factor [CRF]) and the Corvis ST (topographic biomechanical index [TBI] and Corvis biomechanical index) and compared those results with a normal control group (CG).

RESULTS

The clinical records of 26 patients recruited from the Homburg Keratoconus Center diagnosed with a very asymmetrical corneal ectasia were reviewed. The NPE (8.5 ± 1.5 mm Hg) showed a significantly more pathological CH (P < .001) compared with the CG. The CRF was also significantly more pathological (P = .04) for the NPE (8.3 ± 1.5 mm Hg) compared with the CG. The NPE (0.62 ± 0.32) showed a nonsignificant (P = .08) more pathological KMI compared with the CG. Nineteen (73.1%) of 26 NPE had a KMI less than 0.72 and were considered pathological. Compared with the CG, the TBI of the NPE (0.19 ± 0.25) did not differ significantly overall (P = .57). However, 5 (19.2%) of 26 eyes had a TBI more than 0.29 and were considered pathological.

CONCLUSIONS

Topographically and tomographically NPEs in very asymmetrical corneal ectasia frequently showed biomechanical changes. This should be considered before planning any type of refractive corneal surgery in such patients.

Refractive surgery with simultaneous collagen cross-linking for borderline corneas - A review of different techniques, their protocols and clinical outcomes

Simultaneous corneal cross-linking (CXL) has been proposed as an adjunct therapy to corneal refractive procedures to prevent future ectasia, especially when performed in borderline corneas. This review analyses the currently available literature (minimum follow-up 6 months) on corneal refractive surgery and simultaneous CXL (PRK Xtra, LASIK Xtra, and SMILE Xtra) to evaluate the overall results including the safety, efficacy, and potential complications associated with these procedures. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane database, and MEDLINE) was performed up to 20^th May 2020. Four relevant studies were found for PRK Xtra, 12 for LASIK Xtra, and 3 for SMILE Xtra. The total number of eyes included in this review was 1,512: 294 for PRK Xtra, 221 for PRK-only, 446 eyes for LASIK Xtra, 398 eyes for LASIK-only, 91 for SMILE Xtra and 62 for SMILE-only. Current literature suggests that refractive surgery and simultaneous CXL is generally safe and delivers comparable results in terms of visual and refractive outcomes than refractive surgery alone. However, there is no consensus on a standard cross-linking protocol, and complications such as diffuse lamellar keratitis, central toxic keratopathy, and corneal ectasia following Xtra procedures have been reported. It is therefore suggested that surgeons exercise caution in case-selection and counsel their patients regarding the potential risks and benefits with Xtra procedures. Also, further studies are required to standardize the UV-A irradiation protocols and to evaluate the long-term effect on safety, refractive predictability, and stability of these procedures.

Incidence of Keratoconus in Refractive Surgery Population of Vojvodina - Single Center Study

Introduction:

Keratoconus (KCN) is known to affect all ethnicities but its incidence exhibits geographical variability plausibly due to subclinical forms of the disease, differences in diagnostic methods and criteria, or differences in genetic variations in populations.

Aim:

To examine the prevalence of keratoconus among the refractive surgery population of Vojvodina, who underwent refractive surgery screening at Eye Clinic Svjetlost Novi Sad, Serbia from September 2018 to September 2019. This is a single-center study.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis of 876 patients who presented for refractive surgery evaluation. Corneal tomographers represent the gold standard in the detection and classification of corneal ectatic diseases and screening is an essential part of the preoperative diagnostics before any refractive surgery. The corneal tomographer used in this study was a Scheimpflug imaging device (Pentacam AXL, Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany). The device was realigned before each measurement.

Results:

Out of a total number of patients, 619 (70,7%) were candidates for corneal refractive surgery procedure, and 257 patients (29.3%) were not. Out of 257 patients that were not candidates for the procedure 157 (61,0%) patients had thin corneas, high myopia/hypermetropia or had some retinal disease; 75 patients (29,1) were keratoconus suspect and 25 patients (9,7%) had keratoconus. KCN patients had a mean age of 29.5 ± 7.7 years, 18 patients (72.0%) were male and 7 patients were female (28%).

Conclusion:

The most cited annual incidence of KCN is 2 approximately 1 per 2,000. Recent data from the biggest Netherland study revealed many different epidemiological results which deprive keratoconus of the community of rare diseases. The incidence of keratoconus in Vojvodina refractive surgery population presented in our Clinic was 2.9%.

Keratectasia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for myopia: A case report

RATIONALE

Recently, some ophthalmologists performed PRK or LASEK surgeries in FFKC suspicious patients, which is supposed to prevent FFKC evolvement via fibrotic scar formation. Our report indicates that keratectasia can occur after LASEK in FFKC suspicious patients, highlighting the importance of stricter regulation of patient recruitment before the procedure and postoperative follow-up.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This is a report of a 25-year-old man with poor corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) 6 years after LASEK. Preoperatively, central corneal thickness was 532 μm in right eye and 528 μm in leftt eye; corneal keratometry was 42.0/40.3diopters (D) in the right eye and 42.5/40.6D in the left eye; the CDVA was 2/50 in both eyes with the CDVA being 20/20 with -6.00DS/-2.00DC×30 in the right eye and -8.00DS/-2.00DCx150 in the left eye. Six years after LASEK, the CDVA was 20/50 with -5.75DS/-1.75DC×170 in the right eye and 10/50 with -15.00DS/-5.00DC ×155 in the left eye.

DIAGNOSES

Bilateral keratectasia.

INTERVENTIONS

Slit lamp examination, postoperative and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) were performed in both eyes.

OUTCOMES

Examination under the slit lamp showed thinning and protrusion of the central cornea. Corneal topography showed significant inferior steepening with an irregular astigmatism, the corneal thickness at the thinnest point was 376μm and 350 μm and anterior surface keratometry was 43.1/41.2 D and 50.0/48.4 D in the right eye and left eye, respectively (right eye maximum K, 52.1 D; left eye maximum K, 65.6 D). Thin and irregular bands and hyper-reflective deposits in the Bowman's layer were found in IVCM images.

LESSONS

The case indicates that ectasia can occur after LASEK in pre-existing forme fruste keratoconus (FFKC) suspicious patients, highlighting the importance of a stringent preoperative workup on patients before the procedure and proper postoperative follow-up.

Risk profiles of ectasia after keratorefractive surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To identify and evaluate the risk factors of iatrogenic ectasia after refractive surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

We reviewed recently published papers that identified various risk factors associated with ectasia after LASIK, photorefractive keratectomy, small incision lenticule extraction, and other refractive surgical procedures. We also attempted to evaluate the relative contributions of these factors to the development of ectasia following refractive surgery. Forme fruste keratoconus, genetic predisposition to keratoconus, low residual stromal bed thickness (through high myopia, thin preoperative cornea, or thick LASIK flap), and irregular corneal topography have been identified as risk factors for keratectasia development after refractive surgical procedures. A newly proposed metric, percentage tissue altered, has been reported to be a robust indicator for post LASIK ectasia risk calculation. Several cases of keratectasia have also been reported 6 to 12 months following minimally invasive small incision lenticule extraction procedure. Other risk factors associated with iatrogenic ectasia include eye rubbing, young age, and pregnancy.

SUMMARY

Ectasia after refractive surgery is a relatively rare complication which can lead to sight-threatening complications if not detected and treated in time. It is important to continue our quest to improve our methods of identifying absolute and relative risk factors of ectasia and their cut-off values following various keratorefractive surgical procedures.

Risk Factors in Post-LASIK Corneal Ectasia

Purpose. To evaluate the risk factors for post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia. Materials and Methods. Medical records of 42 eyes of 28 (10 women, 18 men) patients who developed corneal ectasia after LASIK were retrospectively reviewed. Topographical features and surgical parameters of those patients were evaluated. Results. The mean age of patients was 34.73 ± 6.50 (23–48) years and the mean interval from LASIK to the diagnosis of post-LASIK ectasia was 36.0 ± 16.92 (12–60) months. The following factors were determined as a risk factors: deep ablation (>75 μm) in 10 eyes, FFK (forme fruste keratoconus) in 6 eyes, steep cornea (>47 D) in 3 eyes, pellucid marginal degeneration (PMD) in 2 eyes, thin cornea (<500 μm) in 2 eyes, thin and steep cornea in 2 eyes, thin cornea and deep ablation in 5 eyes, FFK and steep cornea in 2 eyes, and FFK, steep cornea, and deep ablation in 1 eye. However no risk factor has been determined in 9 eyes (21.4%). Conclusion. The findings of our study showed that most of the patients who developed post-LASIK ectasia have a risk factor for post-LASIK ectasia. However, the most common risk factor was deep ablation.

Corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry

PURPOSE

To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties after LASIK, ReLEx flex, and the flap-free procedure ReLEx smile by Scheimpflug-based dynamic tonometry (Corvis ST) and non-contact differential tonometry (Ocular Response Analyzer, ORA).

METHODS

Patients treated for high myopia (-10.5 to -5.5 diopters, spherical equivalent refraction) more than one year previously at Aarhus University Hospital were included. Treatments comprised LASIK (35 eyes), ReLEx flex (31 eyes), and ReLEx smile (29 eyes). A control group included 31 healthy eyes. Cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc), corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with ORA. Corneal applanation and deformation were registered with Corvis ST during an air-pulse.

RESULTS

Multiple linear regression analysis showed that CH and CRF were significantly lower after all keratorefractive procedures compared to healthy controls (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in CH or CRF between the keratorefractive groups. Corvis ST showed no differences in radius at highest concavity (HC radius), time until first applanation (A1 Time), time until second applanation (A2 Time), and deflection length at highest concavity (HC deflection length) between groups. LASIK treated eyes had significantly shorter time until highest concavity than eyes treated with ReLEx smile (HC Time, p = 0.01). The A1 deflection length was significantly shorter in the keratorefractive groups compared to the healthy controls (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Keratorefrative procedures alter the corneal biomechanical properties with regard to corneal hysteresis and corneal resistant factor. The flap-based LASIK and ReLEx flex and the flap-free ReLEx smile result in similar reduction in corneal biomechanics when evaluated by Corvis ST and ORA.

Investigation of the Efficacy of the Cone Location and Magnitude Index in the Diagnosis of Keratoconus

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of The Cone Location and Magnitude Index (CLMI) in keratoconus diagnosis.

METHODS

301 eyes of 159 keratoconus patients and 394 eyes of 265 refractive surgery candidates as a control group were enrolled in this retrospective clinical study. CLMI was compared with keratometric corneal topography parameters, wavefront aberrations, and pachymetry data derived from optical coherence tomography using independent sample t-tests and ROC curves. Logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the most accurate parameter in keratoconus diagnosis. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to determine the correlation between CLMI and the other measurements.

RESULTS

Average axial CLMI (aCLMI) was 8.19 ± 6.15 D in the keratoconus group and 0.83 ± 0.62 D in the control group (p = 0.001). aCLMI had the greatest sensitivity (89%), specificity (94%), and accuracy (92%) for the keratoconus diagnosis at the best cut-off point of 1.82 according to the ROC curve. Logistic regression analysis selected aCLMI as the most accurate measurement among the other parameters (accuracy 92.8%). aCLMI showed strongest correlations with coma-like aberrations (r = 0.881), total high-order aberrations (r = 0.858), and vertical coma (r = -0.814), respectively.

CONCLUSION

CLMI is a robust index for screening keratoconus with high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy.

Corneal ectasia after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: a long-term study

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term postoperative incidence of and key factors in the genesis of corneal ectasia after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in a large number of cases.

Methods

A retrospective review of one surgeon’s myopic LASIK database was performed. Patients were stratified into two groups based on date of surgery, ie, group 1 (1313 eyes) from 1999 to 2001 and group 2 (2714 eyes) from 2001 to 2003. Visual acuity, refraction, pachymetry, and corneal topography data were available for each patient from examinations performed both before and after the refractive procedures.

Results

Of the 4027 surgically treated eyes, 23 (0.57%) developed keratectasia during the follow-up period, which was a minimum seven years; nine eyes (0.69%) were from group 1 and 14 eyes (0.51%) were from group 2. The onset of corneal ectasia was at 2.57 ± 1.04 (range 1–4) years and 2.64 ± 1.29 (range 0.5–5) years, respectively, for groups 1 and 2. The most important preoperative risk factors using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System were manifest refractive spherical error in group 1 and a thin residual stromal bed in group 2. Each of the cases that developed corneal ectasia had risk factors that were identified.

Conclusion

Ectasia was an uncommon outcome after an otherwise uncomplicated laser in situ keratomileusis procedure. The variables present in eyes developing postoperative LASIK ectasia can be better understood using the Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System.

Comparison of the changes in corneal biomechanical properties after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To compare the postoperative biomechanical properties of the cornea after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with myopia.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 27 eyes of 16 patients undergoing PRK and 31 eyes of 16 patients undergoing LASIK for the correction of myopia. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer before and 3 months after surgery. We also investigated the relationship between these biomechanical changes and the amount of myopic correction.

RESULTS

The CH was decreased significantly from 10.8 +/- 1.3 (mean +/- SD) mmHg to 9.2 +/- 1.6 mmHg after PRK (P < 0.001), and from 10.8 +/- 1.4 mmHg to 8.6 +/- 0.9 mmHg after LASIK (P < 0.001). The CRF was also decreased significantly, from 10.3 +/- 1.5 mmHg to 8.4 +/- 1.8 mmHg after PRK (P < 0.001), and from 10.3 +/- 1.5 mmHg to 7.7 +/- 1.3 mmHg after LASIK (P < 0.001). The amount of decrease in CH and CRF was significantly larger after LASIK than after PRK (P = 0.04). There was a significant correlation between the amount of myopic correction and changes in biomechanical properties after PRK (r = -0.61, P < 0.01 for CH, r = -0.41, P < 0.05 for CRF) and LASIK (r = -0.37, P < 0.05 for CH, r = -0.45, P < 0.05 for CRF).

CONCLUSIONS

Both PRK and LASIK can affect the biomechanical strength of the cornea depending on the amount of myopic correction. The amount of biomechanical changes is larger after LASIK than after PRK. From a biomechanical viewpoint, PRK may be a less invasive surgical approach for the correction of myopia than LASIK.

Validation of the Ectasia Risk Score System for preoperative laser in situ keratomileusis screening

PURPOSE

To validate the Ectasia Risk Score System for identifying patients at high risk for developing ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

DESIGN

Retrospective case-control study.

METHODS

Fifty eyes that developed ectasia and 50 control eyes with normal postoperative courses after LASIK were analyzed and compared using the previously described Ectasia Risk Score System, which assigns points in a weighted fashion to the following variables: topographic pattern, predicted residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness, age, preoperative corneal thickness (CT), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE).

RESULTS

In this series, 46 (92%) eyes with ectasia were correctly classified as being at high risk for the development of ectasia, while three (6%) controls were incorrectly classified as being at high risk for ectasia (P < 1 x 10(-10)). Significantly more eyes were classified as high risk by the ectasia risk score than by traditional screening parameters relying on abnormal topography or RSB thickness less than 250 micro (92% vs 50%; P < .00001). There was no difference in the sensitivity or specificity of the Ectasia Risk Score System in the population from which it was derived and this independent population of ectasia cases and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ectasia Risk Score System is a valid and effective method for detecting eyes at risk for ectasia after LASIK and represents a significant improvement over previously utilized screening strategies.

Risk Assessment for Ectasia after Corneal Refractive Surgery

PURPOSE

To analyze the epidemiologic features of ectasia after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery, to identify risk factors for its development, and to devise a screening strategy to minimize its occurrence.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative and case-control study.

PARTICIPANTS

All cases of ectasia after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery published in the English language with adequate information available through December 2005, unpublished cases seeking treatment at the authors' institution from 1998 through 2005, and a contemporaneous control group who underwent uneventful LASIK and experienced a normal postoperative course.

METHODS

Evaluation of preoperative characteristics, including patient age, gender, spherical equivalent refraction, pachymetry, and topographic patterns; perioperative characteristics, including type of surgery performed, flap thickness, ablation depth, and residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness; and postoperative characteristics including time to onset of ectasia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Development of postoperative corneal ectasia.

RESULTS

There were 171 ectasia cases, including 158 published cases and 13 unpublished cases evaluated at the authors' institution. Ectasia occurred after LASIK in 164 cases (95.9%) and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in 7 cases (4.1%). Compared with controls, more ectasia cases had abnormal preoperative topographies (35.7% vs. 0%; P<1.0x10(-15)), were significantly younger (34.4 vs. 40.0 years; P<1.0x10(-7)), were more myopic (-8.53 vs. -5.09 diopters; P<1.0x10(-7)), had thinner corneas before surgery (521.0 vs. 546.5 microm; P<1.0x10(-7)), and had less RSB thickness (256.3 vs. 317.3 microm; P<1.0x10(-10)). Based on subgroup logistic regression analysis, abnormal topography was the most significant factor that discriminated cases from controls, followed by RSB thickness, age, and preoperative corneal thickness, in that order. A risk factor stratification scale was created, taking all recognized risk factors into account in a weighted fashion. This model had a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 96% in this series.

CONCLUSIONS

A quantitative method can be used to identify eyes at risk for developing ectasia after LASIK that, if validated, represents a significant improvement over current screening strategies.

Analysis of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: Risk factors

PURPOSE

To examine a database of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedures for preoperative and operative factors assumed to increase the risk for developing post-LASIK ectasia.

SETTING

Private clinical practice.

METHODS

A computer database was queried for eyes that had LASIK for myopic refractive errors with the following characteristics: preoperative corneal thickness 500 microm or less, mean keratometry greater than 47.0 diopters (D), patient age 25 years or younger, attempted correction greater than -8.0 D, refractive astigmatism not with-the-rule and greater than 2.0 D, and residual stromal bed thickness (RST) 250 microm or less. Flap thickness and RST were measured using ultrasound pachymetry. All recorded information was exported to MS Excel and analyzed for eyes that had ectasia.

RESULTS

Of the 9700 eyes in the database, none with the above characteristics developed ectasia over mean follow-up periods exceeding 2 years. Seven eyes had multiple risk factors without ectasia. Three eyes with abnormal preoperative topography developed ectasia.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual preoperative and operative factors did not in and of themselves increase the risk for ectasia. Unmeasured and unknown factors that affect the individual cornea's biomechanical stability, in combination with some suspected risk factors as well as the current inability to identify corneas at risk for developing ectatic disorders, probably account for most eyes that develop ectasia today.

Identification of scanning slit-beam topographic parameters important in distinguishing normal from keratoconic corneal morphologic features

PURPOSE

To identify morphologic parameters obtained using scanning slit-beam topography that help distinguish normal from keratoconic corneal morphologic features.

DESIGN

Observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study.

METHODS

This retrospective review examined 207 normal eyes of patients undergoing an initial consultation for primary refractive surgery and 42 eyes with clinical keratoconus (KCN). The following parameters were examined and compared between the two groups: astigmatism, central corneal power, irregularity indices at 3 mm (II3) and 5 mm (II5), maximal posterior elevation (MPE) magnitude and location, thinnest optical pachymetry (TOP) magnitude and location, anterior elevation best-fit sphere (ABFS), posterior elevation best-fit sphere (PBFS), the ratio of ABFS to PBFS, the difference between average inferior and average superior K values at 3 mm and 5 mm in both keratometric (I-S K3 and I-S K5) and tangential (I-S T3 and I-S T5) topographic maps, and skewed radial axis at 3 mm (SRAX3) and 5 mm (SRAX5) of the keratometric topography map.

RESULTS

The II3, II5, MPE magnitude, TOP magnitude, ABFS, PBFS, ABFS-to-PBFS ratio, I-S K at both 3 mm and 5 mm, I-S T at both 3 and 5 mm, and SRAX at 3 mm and 5 mm values were significantly different among the two groups (P < .001). The least-correlated parameters were SRAX3, TOP magnitude, and II3 in the KCN group and I-S K3, amount of astigmatism and MPE magnitude in the normal group.

CONCLUSIONS

Parameters obtained using scanning slit-beam topography may allow improved differentiation of keratoconic from normal corneal shapes, especially when the poorly correlated intragroup parameters are used.

The safety of 250 microm residual stromal bed in preventing keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)

To determine if the residual corneal stromal bed of 250 microm is enough to prevent iatrogenic keratectasia in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), we studied 958 patients who underwent LASIK from April 2000 to October 2003 retrospectively. The estimated probabilities of the residual stromal bed, that was less than 250 microm, were calculated using the published flap thickness data of Moria C&B microkeratome. Then we calculated the ratio of the real incidence of keratectasia to the expected the percentage of the patients with less than 250 microm residual stromal bed in our study. Using the LASIK flap thickness data of Miranda, Kezirian and Nagy, the expected probabilities that the residual stroma would be less than 250 microm were 8.8%, 4.3% and 1.5% of the 1,916 eyes respectively, while keratectasia developed in both eyes (0.1%) of 1 patient in our study. The estimated ratio of the keratectatic eyes to eyes with less than 250 microm stromal bed were 1.2-6.9%. Compared to the number of eyes with residual stromal thickness less than 250 microm, the incidence of keratectasia was relatively low. The residual stromal bed thickness of more than 250 microm may possibly be safe, but further observations for long period are necessary.

2005 ESCRS Ridley Medal Lecture

The literature on keratoconus and progressive post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia (PPLK) was studied after a retrospective review of 137 highly myopic eyes (mean -15.58 diopters) 5 to 9 years after LASIK. Only 2 eyes developed keratectasia, 1 after automated lamellar keratolasty for myopia and 1 after myopic LASIK. In neither case was intraoperative pachymetry carried out. In the PPLK case, a residual stromal bed thickness (RSBT) of 120 microm was discovered when a retreatment was attempted on lifting the flap. The PPLK developed 2 years later. The obvious discrepancy between reported cases of PPLK and the expected rate from the incidences in larger retrospective studies and our own 15-year experience suggests that PPLK is not a significant complication provided the standard rules applying to the preoperative total corneal thickness and RSBT are observed. However, newer techniques for the study of posterior corneal changes and those involving corneal biomechanics should be used in the future to study the long-term effects of LASIK on the cornea.

Probability Model of the Inaccuracy of Residual Stromal Thickness Prediction to Reduce the Risk of Ectasia After LASIK Part II: Quantifying Population Risk

PURPOSE

To derive a statistical model to estimate the rate of excessive keratectomy depth below a selected cut-off residual stromal thickness (RST) given a minimum target RST and specific Clinical Protocol; apply the model to estimate the RST below which ectasia appears likely to occur and back-calculate the safe minimum target RST that should be used given a specific Clinical Protocol.

METHODS

Myopia and corneal thickness distribution were modeled for a population of 5212 eyes that underwent LASIK. The probability distribution of predicted target RST error (Part I) was used to calculate the rate of excessive keratectomy depth for this series. All treatments were performed using the same Clinical Protocol; one surgeon, Moria LSK-One microkeratome, NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser, Orbscan pachymetry, and a minimum target RST of 250 microm--the Vancouver Clinical Protocol. The model estimated the RST below which ectasia appears likely to occur and back-calculated the safe minimum target RST. These values were recalculated for a series of microkeratomes using published flap thickness statistics as well as for the Clinical Protocol of one of the authors-the London Clinical Protocol.

RESULTS

In the series of 5212 eyes, 6 (0.12%) cases of ectasia occurred. The model predicted an RST of 191 microm for ectasia to occur and that a minimum target RST of 329 microm would have reduced the -rate of ectasia to 1: 1,000,000 for the Vancouver Clinical Protocol. The model predicted that the choice of microkeratome varied the rate of ectasia between 0.01 and 11,623 eyes per million and the safe minimum target RST between 220 and 361 microm. The model predicted the rate of ectasia would have been 0.000003: 1,000,000 had the London Clinical Protocol been used for the Vancouver case series.

CONCLUSIONS

There appears to be no universally safe minimum target RST to assess suitability for LASIK largely due to the disparity in accuracy and reproducibility of microkeratome flap thickness. This model may be used as a tool to evaluate the risk of ectasia due to excessive keratectomy depth and help determine the minimum target RST given a particular Clinical Protocol.

Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to review the causes, risk factors, management, and future research directions for corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Complex corneal biomechanical processes influence the integrity of the normal and postoperative cornea, and developing an understanding of these processes facilitates recognition of risk factors for ectasia after laser in-situ keratomileusis. Currently identified risk factors include keratoconus, high myopia, low residual stromal bed thickness from excessive ablation or thick flap creation, and defined topographic abnormalities such as forme fruste keratoconus and pellucid marginal corneal degeneration. Ectasia can also rarely occur in patients without currently identifiable risk factors, and future identification of at-risk patients may be facilitated by corneal interferometry and corneal hysteresis measurements. Utilization of intraoperative pachymetry measurements at the time of surgery and confocal microscopy prior to enhancement to measure residual stromal bed thickness should avoid unanticipated low residual stromal bed thickness. Management options for ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis include intraocular pressure reduction, rigid gas permeable contact lenses, and intracorneal ring segments, in addition to corneal transplantation. In the future, collagen cross-linking may reduce corneal steepening and improve refractive error.

SUMMARY

When ectasia develops, early recognition and proper management are essential to prevent progression, to promote visual rehabilitation, and to reduce the need for corneal transplantation for these patients.

Corneal Ectasia after Photorefractive Keratectomy for Low Myopia

OBJECTIVE

To alert ophthalmologists of the possibility of an aggravation of forme fruste keratoconus after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

DESIGN

Clinical case report.

INTERVENTION

Standard bilateral PRK for low myopia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Corneal topography, corneal thickness, and visual acuity.

RESULTS

Corneal ectasia occurred bilaterally after PRK. Retrospective analysis of preoperative videokeratography indicated the existence of forme fruste keratoconus on the left eye.

CONCLUSIONS

This article is the first case report of a bilateral corneal ectasia after PRK for low myopia. Even if there is no direct proof to demonstrate that PRK has worsened the evolution of keratoconus, the safety of the PRK procedure in forme fruste keratoconus must be considered.

Corneal Ectasia After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis in Patients Without Apparent Preoperative Risk Factors

PURPOSE

To evaluate patients who developed ectasia with no apparent preoperative risk factors.

METHODS

Potential cases of patients who developed ectasia without apparent risk factors were identified by contacting participants in the Kera-Net (n = 580), ASCRS-Net (n = 450), and ISRS/AAO ISRS-Net (n = 525) internet bulletin boards from April to October 2003. Cases were included if ectasia developed after laser in situ keratomileusis in the absence of apparent preoperative risk factors. Reported cases were excluded for the following reasons: (1) calculated residual stromal bed less than 250 microm, (2) preoperative central pachymetry less than 500 microm, (3) any keratometry reading greater than 47.2 diopters (D), (4) a calculated inferior-superior value greater than 1.4, (5) more than 2 retreatments, (6) attempted initial correction greater than -12.00 D, (7) an Orbscan II "posterior float" (if obtained) greater than 50 microm, and (8) surgical/flap complications.

RESULTS

A total of 27 eyes of 25 patients were submitted for consideration. Eight eyes (8 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 27.7 years (range, 18-41 years). Preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -4.61 D (range, -2.00 to -8.00 D); steepest keratometric reading was 43.86 D (range, 42.50-46.40 D); keratometric astigmatism was 0.93 D (range, 0.25-1.90 D); and preoperative central pachymetry was 537 microm (range, 505-560 microm). The mean calculated ablation depth was 82.8 microm (range, 21-125.4 microm), and mean calculated residual stromal bed was 299.5 microm (range, 254-373 microm). Mean time to recognition of ectasia onset was 14.2 months (range, 3-27 months) postoperatively. At the time of ectasia diagnosis, the mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was -1.23 D (range, +0.125 to -3.00) with a mean of 2.72 D (range, 0.75-4.00 D) of astigmatism.

CONCLUSIONS

Ectasia can occur after an otherwise uncomplicated laser in situ keratomileusis procedure, even in the absence of apparent preoperative risk factors.

Reversal of laser in situ keratomileusis–induced ectasia with intraocular pressure reduction

A 40 year-old woman had laser in situ keratomileusis for --7.75 --0.75 x 20 in the right eye. Preoperative examinations, including topography, pachymetry, and intraocular pressures (IOPs), were normal, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 20/20 in each eye. By 4 months postoperatively, the uncorrected visual acuity and BSCVA in the right eye had decreased to 20/40. Corneal topography of that eye was consistent with ectasia. One drop per day of timolol 0.5% (Timoptic XE) was prescribed. Five months postoperatively, the IOP had decreased and BSCVA and topography had improved. At 11 months, BSCVA returned to 20/20 and corneal topography normalized. Topographic difference maps were used to monitor corneal shape changes. In this case, early reduction in IOP completely reversed the ectasia.

Management of a post-ELLKAT keratectasia with a gas permeable contact lens

BACKGROUND

The Excimer laser keratoplasty of augmented thickness for keratoconus (ELLKAT) has been proposed for the refractive management of keratoconus.

CASE REPORT

A 41-year-old man with a history of bilateral keratoconus came to the clinic for a contact lens. He had undergone an ELLKAT procedure in his right eye some months earlier in an attempt to obtain acceptable unaided vision. As the result in this eye was not positive, the surgery in the fellow eye was cancelled. On examination, I diagnosed a centrally located keratectasia (KE) in his RE. After surgery, the corneal shape presented some complications in relation to contact lens fitting. The patient was able to achieve 6/9.6 acuity with adequate comfort with a Soper lens using a "modified three-point touch" relationship.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical procedure of ELLKAT can exhibit some advantages with regard to the penetrating keratoplasty. In this case, because a keratectasia was induced, a contact lens fitting was needed to restore vision. A gas permeable contact lens with a Soper design and with a "modified three-point touch" fitting was a viable clinical solution. The fitting of contact lenses in cases of keratectasia can be a practical solution that may avoid the need for further surgery.

Surface and Orbscan II slit-scanning elevation topography in circumscribed posterior keratoconus

We used an Orbscan II topography system (Bausch & Lomb) to study anterior and posterior surface abnormalities, keratometry, and topographic pachymetry in a patient with circumscribed posterior keratoconus. This system clearly showed a marked localized paracentral annular elevation in the posterior corneal surface that corresponded to an abrupt decrease in thickness and a slightly localized anterior surface bulge in the anterior float.