Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for corneal ectasia

Epithelium-on versus epithelium-off corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) is the primary treatment for progressive keratoconus which has a significant impact on vision and quality of life. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of epithelium-on versus epithelium-off CXL to treat keratoconus.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. We included studies that compared standard epithelium-off with epithelium-on CXL. The primary outcome measures were changes in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and maximum keratometry (Kmax), and the secondary outcomes were uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and adverse events. A meta-analysis was performed on the primary and secondary outcomes based on the weighted mean differences between baseline to 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The search retrieved 887 publications with 27 included in the systematic review. A total of 1622 eyes (1399 patients; age 25.51 ± 4.02 years) were included in comparisons of epithelium-off to epithelium-on CXL in keratoconus. Epithelium-off CXL treated 800 eyes and epithelium-on CXL for 822 eyes. At 12-month follow-up, CDVA and Kmax showed no significant difference between the epithelium-off and epithelium-on CXL. The secondary outcomes showed that UDVA was better in epithelium-off CXL (- 0.11D, 95% CI - 0.12, - 0.1; p < 0.001) and there was more thinning in CCT in epithelium-off CXL (- 3.23 μm, 95% CI - 4.64, - 1.81; p <0.001).

CONCLUSION

Epithelium-off and epithelium-on CXL were both effective to treat progressive keratoconus. Further research is needed to compare the long-term outcomes and safety of both CXL protocols for adaptation into clinical practice.

The effect of transepithelial corneal collagen cross-linking treatment on optical quality of the cornea in keratoconus: 12-month clinical results

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of transepithelial corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) treatment on the optical performance of the cornea at 12-month follow-up after CXL in patients with progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

One hundred and ten eyes of 67 patients were included. The following corneal optical aberrations over the 4-mm-diameter pupil were recorded via Sirius dual-scanning corneal tomography: total, anterior and posterior amount of corneal higher order aberrations [HOAs], vertical coma, horizontal coma, vertical trefoil, oblique trefoil, and spherical aberration, and Strehl ratio of point spread function (PSF).

RESULTS

There were significant improvements in mean root mean square error values for corneal total HOA, total coma, anterior HOA, anterior coma, and vertical coma following CXL (P > 0.05, for all). No significant changes were found in the posterior aberometric parameters. PSF value did not change after CXL (P > 0.05). The corneal topographic measurements not revealed a change in the mean simulated keratometry-1, simulated keratometry-2, and maximum keratometry compared with the baseline measurements (P > 0.05, for all). At 12 months, there was a significant improvement in the uncorrected (UCVA) and best corrected (BCVA) visual acuity (P < 0.001, both). Most corneal aberrations correlated significantly with postoperative BCVA, but changes in HOAs were not statistically associated with improvements in visual acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Transepithelial CXL was effective in stabilizing the keratometric indices and improving the most corneal aberrations in keratoconic eyes 1 year after the procedure. While the healing effect on aberrations after CXL was in total and anterior parameters, no significant changes were observed in the posterior surface. In addition, it was observed that transepithelial CXL treatment did not cause a significant change in PSF distribution data.

A review of the epithelial and stromal effects of corneal collagen crosslinking

Induced corneal collagen crosslinking and mechanical stiffening via ultraviolet-A photoactivation of riboflavin (UVA CXL) is now a common treatment for corneal ectasia and Keratoconus. Some effects of the procedure such as induced mechanical stiffening, corneal flattening, and cellular toxicity are well-known, but others remain more controversial. Authors report a variety of contradictory effects, and provide evidence based on individual results and observations. A full understanding of the effects of and mechanisms behind this procedure are essential to predicting its outcome. A growing interest in modifications to the standard UVA CXL protocol, such as transepithelial or accelerated UVA CXL, makes analyzing the literature as a whole more urgent. This review presents an analysis of both the agreed-upon and contradictory results reported and the various methods used to obtain them.

Dexpanthenol/sodium hyaluronate eye drops for corneal epithelial healing following corneal cross-linking in patients with keratoconus

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of dexpanthenol 2%/sodium hyaluronate 0.15% eye drops on corneal epithelial healing and corneal microstructural changes following corneal cross-linking (CXL) in patients with keratoconus.

METHODS

The study included 42 eyes of 21 patients with keratoconus who underwent CXL on both eyes. One eye of each patient was instilled dexpanthenol 2%/sodium hyaluronate 0.15% eye drops (DP/SH group) and the fellow eye was instilled unpreserved sodium hyaluronate 0.15% eye drops (SH group). The epithelial healing process was assessed every day until complete reepithelialization was achieved. The in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) findings were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean epithelial defect size 48.6 ± 6.7 mm2 for the DP/SH group and 48.2 ± 5.3 mm2 for the SH group. Complete reepithelialization was seen after 2.24 ± 0.44 days (range 2-4 days) in the DP/SH group and 3.43 ± 0.60 days (3 to 5 days) in the SH group. Posterior keratocyte density and endothelial cell density were similar in both groups. The mean subbasal nerve plexus density was significantly higher in the DP/SH group (postoperative 1 month: 1.13 ± 1.51, 3 months: 3.53 ± 2.55, 6 months: 7.07 ± 1.42) compared to the SH group (postoperative 1 month: 0.87 ± 1.43, 3 months: 2.89 ± 2.62, 6 months 6.33 ± 1.29). The DP/SH group revealed faster subbasal nerve regeneration and less edema compared to the SH group.

CONCLUSION

Dexpanthenol 2%/sodium hyaluronate 0.15% eye drops were effective and safe for corneal epithelial healing, and promoted faster corneal reepithelialization, nerve regeneration, and keratocyte repopulation with reduced corneal edema compared to sodium hyaluronate eye drops.

Management of keratoconus: an updated review

Keratoconus is the most common corneal ectatic disorder. It is characterized by progressive corneal thinning with resultant irregular astigmatism and myopia. Its prevalence has been estimated at 1:375 to 1:2,000 people globally, with a considerably higher rate in the younger populations. Over the past two decades, there was a paradigm shift in the management of keratoconus. The treatment has expanded significantly from conservative management (e.g., spectacles and contact lenses wear) and penetrating keratoplasty to many other therapeutic and refractive modalities, including corneal cross-linking (with various protocols/techniques), combined CXL-keratorefractive surgeries, intracorneal ring segments, anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and more recently, Bowman's layer transplantation, stromal keratophakia, and stromal regeneration. Several recent large genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified important genetic mutations relevant to keratoconus, facilitating the development of potential gene therapy targeting keratoconus and halting the disease progression. In addition, attempts have been made to leverage the power of artificial intelligence-assisted algorithms in enabling earlier detection and progression prediction in keratoconus. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current and emerging treatment of keratoconus and propose a treatment algorithm for systematically guiding the management of this common clinical entity.

Norepinephrine as an Enhancer Promoting Corneal Penetration of Riboflavin for Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking

Purpose

Previously, we found norepinephrine (NE) could affect the corneal epithelial integrity, herein we investigated the feasibility and safety of NE serving as a chemical enhancer to promote corneal penetration of riboflavin during transepithelial corneal crosslinking (CXL).

Methods

The dosage of NE that could promote riboflavin diffusion through the healthy epithelial barrier without inducing epithelial damage in C57BL/6 mice was determined. The safety of NE treatment was confirmed by morphological and histological examinations of the whole cornea. The efficacy of NE in promoting riboflavin penetration was verified by slit lamp and scanning electron microscope (SEM), and corneal biomechanical measurement after CXL. To better fit the clinical scenario, increased NE dosage and shortened riboflavin infiltration time were further evaluated.

Results

The lowest dosage of NE (1 mg/mL) that facilitated transepithelial riboflavin permeation was 2 µL. No visible corneal structure alteration was observed after NE treatment. SEM indicated dissociation of intercellular junctions among corneal epithelial cells. Homogenous distribution of riboflavin throughout corneal stroma was observed. NE-treated corneas reached comparable biomechanical properties after CXL, including stress-relaxation curve and elastic modulus, with corneas treated with the commercially available transepithelial drug Peschke TE. To better fit the clinical scenario, increasing NE up to 5.5 µL helped riboflavin infiltrate the corneal stroma within 30 minutes. After CXL with 9 mW/cm2 ultraviolet-A (UVA) for 2.5 minutes, the cornea showed significantly enhanced corneal biomechanical properties with undisturbed corneal endothelium.

Conclusions

NE serves as an effective enhancer in increasing riboflavin diffusion with limited impairment on corneal epithelium and has great potential for clinical application.

Translation Relevance

NE serves as an effective enhancer for riboflavin penetration and clinical transepithelial CXL.

Current clinical practice in corneal crosslinking for treatment of progressive keratoconus in four Nordic countries

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of progressive keratoconus with corneal crosslinking (CXL) in four Nordic countries.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to all centres at which keratoconus patients are evaluated and CXL is performed in Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Iceland. Nineteen of 20 centres participated.

RESULTS

CXL is performed approximately 1300 times per year in these four Nordic countries with a population of around 21.7 million (2019). In most cases, progression is evaluated using the Pentacam HR, and the maximum keratometry reading (K_max ) is considered the most important parameter. The most frequently used treatment protocol in Scandinavia is the 9 mW/cm² epi-off protocol, using hydroxylpropyl methylcellulose riboflavin (HPMC-riboflavin). The participants deemed the following areas to be in most need of improvement: adaptation of the CXL protocol to individual patients (5/19), the development of effective epi-on treatment protocols (4/19), optimal performance of CXL in thin corneas (4/19), improvement of the definition of progression (2/19), and diagnosis of the need for re-treatment (2/19).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the diagnosis of progressive keratoconus and the diagnostic equipment used are similar. Treatment strategies are also similar but are suitably different to provide an interesting basis for the comparison of treatment outcomes. The high degree of participation in this survey indicates the possibility of future scientific collaboration on CXL focusing on the areas deemed to need improvement. It would also be of interest to evaluate the possibility of creating a Nordic CXL Registry. The high number of CXL treatments performed ensures sufficient statistical power to solve many questions. Such a registry could be an important contribution to evidence-based care and would allow for longitudinal evaluation.

Novel Technique to Improve the Efficacy of Corneal Cross Linking in Cases of Post LASIK Ectasia

Purpose

The aim of the present study was to validate the use of a novel technique that can improve the efficacy of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in cases with post LASIK ectasia.

Methods

This is a retrospective, comparative study that was conducted on patients who sought medical advice at Ain Shams University Hospitals and Maadi Eye Subspeciality Center, Cairo, Egypt. It included two groups of patients with post LASIK ectasia. Group 1 included patients who performed our proposed protocol (topo-guided PRK, followed by customized phototherapeutic keratectomy "PTK" to transmit the laser treatment to the corneal stroma, then CXL). For group 2, accelerated CXL was performed. Subjective refraction and relevant topographic/tomographic parameters (Sirius topographer) compared between the two groups. Recorded follow-ups included the 2 to 3-month follow-up visit and the last visit (mean ± SD of 17.2 months ± 10.2).

Results

Patients of group 1 (22 eyes of 22 patients) experienced significant improvements in most of the evaluated parameters at the 2- to 3-month follow-up visit and showed stability of the ectatic condition at the last follow-up visit, whereas patients of group 2 (10 eyes of 10 patients) showed stability of their ectatic condition at the 2- to 3-month follow-up visit, and one patient developed ectasia progression at the last follow-up visit.

Conclusion

The present study validates the use of our novel protocol in cases having post LASIK ectasia with proven efficacy, safety, and stability, providing regularization for the corneal surface while simultaneously avoiding the unnecessary loss of cross-linking effect within the LASIK flap that no longer shares in the corneal biomechanical strength.

EpiSmart® Crosslinking for Keratoconus: A Phase 2 Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess changes in visual acuity after epithelium-on ("epi-on") corneal crosslinking after a diagnosis of keratoconus.

METHODS

Subjects with corneal ectatic diseases were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter trial. Subjects were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups and treated with an epi-on crosslinking system including riboflavin/sodium iodide and pulsed UVA exposure (EpiSmart® , CXL Ophthalmics, Encinitas, CA). The UVA treatment groups were 2.4 J/cm2 over 20 minutes, 3.6 J/cm2 over 20 minutes, and 3.6 J/cm2 over 30 minutes. The primary end point was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA). Secondary end points were logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA), maximum corneal curvature (Kmax), and minimum corneal thickness. Data were assessed 6 and 12 months post-operatively, using t-tests for differences from baseline.

RESULTS

Two thousand two hundred twenty-eight subjects were treated with epi-on crosslinking. One thousand nine hundred twenty-two subjects had a diagnosis of keratoconus; other treated eyes had postsurgical and other ectasias. At 6 and 12 months, the subjects with keratoconus demonstrated significant improvements in CDVA, UCVA, and Kmax; minimum corneal thickness was unchanged. One hundred ninety-five subjects (8.7%) reported at least 1 adverse event (AE). A mild corneal epithelial defect was reported in 31 cases (1.4%) and was the only AE reported in >1% of subjects. There were no serious AEs related to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

EpiSmart® epi-on crosslinking resulted in mean improvements in CDVA, UCVA, and Kmax at both 6 and 12 months and an excellent safety and efficacy profile in subjects with keratoconus, with few significant side effects. Differences between UVA treatment groups were not significant.

Pachymetric Assessment After EpiSmart® Epithelium-on Cross-Linking for Keratoconus and Post-Surgical Ectasia

Purpose

To assess the change in corneal pachymetry after a novel epithelium-on (EpiSmart^®) corneal crosslinking procedure (CXL).

Methods

Eyes treated as part of the open-label, non-controlled arm of the study “Collagen Crosslinking with Ultraviolet-A in Asymmetric Corneas” (NCT01097447) were examined at baseline, 3-, 6- and 12-months post-CXL. Thinnest pachymetry readings based on Pentacam (OCULUS GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) were recorded.

Results

A total of 101 eyes met the study inclusion criteria. Thinnest pachymetric readings at baseline averaged 451 ± 50 microns. The mean (± SD) minimum thickness was 450 ± 46 microns at 3 months, 452 ± 47 microns at 6 months, and 451 ± 48 microns at 12 months post-CXL. The changes from baseline (mean ± SE) at 3, 6, and 12 months post-CXL were −1.2 ± 1.5 microns, 0.5 ± 1.6 microns, and 0.4 ± 1.6 microns, respectively. Student’s t-tests showed no statistically significant change in pachymetry from baseline for any exam period.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that, after EpiSmart^® epithelium-on CXL, there was no substantial corneal thinning observable on Scheimpflug tomography out to 12 months.

Analysis of Tear Function Outcomes following Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment in Ectatic Corneas

Purpose

To analyze tear function outcomes following collagen cross-linking (CXL) treatment in ectatic corneas.

Methods

Fifty-seven eyes of 34 patients were included, and patients with keratoconus who underwent epithelium-on (epi-on) or epithelium-off (epi-off) CXL were evaluated. The following tests were performed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively: best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), maximum keratometry value (Kmax), ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, slit-lamp examination, tear meniscus height, first noninvasive Keratograph breakup time (1st NIKBUT), average NIKBUT, and bulbar redness.

Results

BCVA improved in both epi-on and epi-off groups at most follow-up points, but was not significantly different between groups. At 12-month follow-up, Kmax in the epi-on and epi-off groups improved after CXL, but there was no significant difference between the groups. The OSDI in both groups decreased after operation compared with before surgery, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Comparing the two groups, only the change in the tear meniscus height at 6 months postoperatively was statistically significant, and the pre- and postoperative values of the two groups were within the normal range (>0.20 mm). The change was small and had no clinical significance. There was no change in the 1st NIKBUT and average NIKBUT between the epi-on and epi-off groups. A change in bulbar redness was significantly better in the epi-off group than in the epi-on group at 3 months postoperatively. Comparing the effects at 1 year postoperatively, both groups had positive results in OSDI, NIKBUT, tear meniscus height, and bulbar redness.

Conclusion

Both epi-on and epi-off CXL can control the progression of keratoconus, although epi-off CXL is more effective. Both methods have a positive effect on dry eye, which can improve the condition of the tear film and reduce dry eye symptoms in patients with keratoconus.

Topographic Outcomes in Keratoconus Surgery: Epi-on versus Epi-off Iontophoresis Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking

Background: Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) has become the gold standard for mild and moderate stages to stop the progression of keratoconus. We analyzed some corneal topography indices to compare iontophoresis epi-on and iontophoresis epi-off techniques throughout a two-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 64 eyes of 49 patients who underwent CXL were recruited. In 30 eyes the epi-off technique was performed, whereas the remaining 34 eyes were treated with the epi-on technique. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination that included CDVA, central and thinnest corneal thickness, Schirmer test I, TBUT test, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Results: In both groups, a significant improvement in visual function was recorded. No statistically significant differences between Kmax, Mean K, Flat K, Steep K values were found. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ pachymetry before and after 24 months follow-up as well as between the epi-on and epi-off groups’ topographically thinnest point in the immediate post-surgery and 24 months after surgery were recorded. Conclusion: Our study highlighted that both techniques are valid in mid-term corneal stabilization. The advantage of the new iontophoresis epi-off cross-linking technique could be found in a faster imbibing time of the cornea, therefore reducing surgical times, with a lower risk of complications.

Long-Term Follow-Up of Accelerated Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking for Post-LASIK Ectasia: A Pilot Prospective Observational Study

Background: Keratectasia after corneal refractive surgery is a rare but serious postoperative complication, and reports on accelerated transepithelial corneal crosslinking (ATE-CXL)-based treatment of patients with post-laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) ectasia are limited. Therefore, this study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of ATE-CXL for progressive post-LASIK ectasia.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, and 25 eyes from 25 patients with post-LASIK ectasia undergoing ATE-CXL were examined. Clinical examinations were conducted preoperatively and postoperatively to assess parameters such as manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), endothelial cell density; keratometry, corneal thickness, posterior elevation and topometric indices were measured using Pentacam; sectoral pachymetry and epithelial thickness were evaluated using optical coherence tomography. A paired t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and repeated measures analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Participants were examined for an average of 46 months. No severe complications occurred during or after ATE-CXL. CDVA improved from 0.25 ± 0.31 preoperatively to 0.15 ± 0.17 postoperatively (p = 0.011). Maximum keratometry decreased from 55.20 ± 8.33 D to 54.40 ± 7.98 D, with no statistical significance (p = 0.074), and the central corneal thickness increased from 414.92 ± 40.96 μm to 420.28 ± 44.78 μm (p = 0.047) at the final follow-up. Posterior elevation, pachymetry, and epithelial thickness remained stable (p > 0.05) throughout the follow-up. No significant differences were noted in topometric indices, except the central keratoconus index, which decreased significantly (p < 0.001) at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: Improvements in CDVA and stabilization in corneal keratometry and posterior elevation after ATE-CXL were noted at the 46-months follow-up, demonstrating that ATE-CXL is a safe and effective treatment for progressive post-LASIK ectasia.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of accelerated trans-epithelial crosslinking for keratoconus patients with corneas thicker and thinner than 380µm

PURPOSE

Accelerated trans-epithelial cross-linking (ATE-CXL), a therapy to halt keratoconus progression, has the merit of widening the indications for thinner corneas (<380 μm). Since a hypotonic solution affects the swollen cornea, corneas of <380 μm thickness at preoperative measurement can be an indication for ATE-CXL. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ATE-CXL for keratoconus between corneas with thicknesses <380 μm and ≥380 μm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-four eyes of 27 patients who underwent ATE-CXL (30 mW/cm²; 3 minutes) with completion of a 24-month follow-up, were enrolled and divided into two groups: Group 1, thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), <380 μm (n = 10) and Group 2, TCT, ≥380 μm (n = 24). A hypotonic solution was administered to Group 1 until the corneal thickness increased by >380 μm before UV-A irradiation. We measured uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), maximum and average keratometric values (Kmax and AveK), central corneal thickness (CCT), TCT by anterior segment optical coherence tomography, and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) using specular microscopy. The changes from baseline to 24 months postoperatively between the two groups were compared accordingly.

RESULTS

The changes in Kmax and AveK from baseline to 24 months in Group 1 (ΔKmax: -7.8±7.7 D, ΔAveK: -4.3±6.1 D) showed significant decreases compared to those in Group 2 (ΔKmax: 0.2±3.0 D, ΔAveK: 0.6±2.7 D) (p = 0.004 and p = 0.001), and there were no significant changes from baseline to 24 months postoperatively in UCVA, BCVA, CCT, TCT, and ECD in both groups.

CONCLUSION

ATE-CXL is effective and safe for keratoconic corneas in both groups. The effect of reducing keratometric values was greater in the group with thinner corneas.

Transepithelial Versus Epithelium-Off Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to summarize key findings from a systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of transepithelial corneal crosslinking (CXL) compared with epithelium-off CXL for progressive keratoconus.

DESIGN

Cochrane systematic review.

METHODS

We included in our review only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which transepithelial and epithelium-off CXL had been compared among participants with progressive keratoconus. The primary outcome was keratoconus stabilization based on post-operative maximum keratometry (Kmax). We adhered to Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and data synthesis.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs with 567 participants (661 eyes) were included; 11 studies compared non-iontophoresis-assisted transepithelial with epithelium-off CXL. Keratoconus stabilization was described as an outcome in 2 studies. The estimated difference in Kmax means (ie, the "mean difference," MD) from meta-analysis of 177 eyes in 5 RCTs indicated that there were no differences between intervention groups in Kmax at 12 months or later (MD: 0.99 diopter [D]; 95% confidence interval: -0.11 to 2.09). Meta-analysis of keratometry and visual acuity outcomes at 12 months or longer after surgery from 2 studies that had compared transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis provided no conclusive evidence of an advantage over epithelium-off CXL.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of precision due to small sample sizes, indeterminate risk of bias due to inadequate reporting, and inconsistency in how outcomes were measured and reported among studies make it difficult to state with confidence whether transepithelial CXL confers an advantage over epithelium-off CXL for patients with progressive keratoconus with respect to stabilization of keratoconus, visual acuity, or patient-reported outcomes based on available data.

Transepithelial Corneal Crosslinking Using a Novel Ultraviolet Light-Emitting Contact Lens Device: A Pilot Study

Purpose

To evaluate the feasibility of a novel, on-eye UVA light-emitting contact lens device driven by fiber optics for the corneal crosslinking (CXL) of patients with keratoconus.

Methods

In nine corneal transplant candidates with advanced keratoconus a scleral contact lens reservoir containing 0.007% benzalkonium chloride preserved with 0.25% riboflavin-monophosphate was placed on the eye for 30 minutes. The reservoir lens was removed and replaced with the CXLens UVA light-emitting contact lens. A 375-nm UVA light at 4 mW/cm² intensity was delivered for 30 minutes for a dose of 7.2 J/cm². A one-sided paired t-test was used to evaluate mean differences in maximum keratometry, thinnest corneal thickness, and endothelial cell density between screening and 6 months after CXL. A two-sided paired t-test was used to evaluate differences in best-corrected distance visual acuity between screening and 6 months after CXL.

Results

All patients received the treatment as per protocol and adhered to follow-up testing. At 6 months after CXL, treated eyes had an average −1.0 ± 1.6 diopters decrease in the maximum keratometry (P = 0.049), a nonsignificant 2.3 ± 7.5 letter improvement in best-corrected distance visual acuity (P = 0.19), a nonsignificant −17 ± 14 µm decrease in thinnest corneal thickness (P < 0.01), and a nonsignificant −86 ± 266 cells/mm² decrease in endothelial cell density (P = 0.20).

Conclusions

Our pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of the novel CXL device for the treatment of keratoconus and indicates the device is ready for larger scale studies with longer follow-up periods.

Translational Relevance

The novel CXLens on-eye UVA light-emitting contact lens device offers the potential for efficient, high-throughput transepithelial corneal CXL.

Comparison of Contact Lens Assisted and Transepithelial Corneal Cross Linking with Standard 'Epithelium Off' Cross Linking for Progressive Keratoconus: 24 Month Clinical Results

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes of contact lens assisted corneal cross linking (CACXL) and transepithelial corneal cross linking (TECXL) with standard 'epithelium off'' ('epi -off') cross linking (CXL) for progressive keratoconus.

SETTING

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh , India.

DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative study.

METHODS

Patients with progressive keratoconus undergoing CXL with a minimum follow up of 24 months were included. CACXL and TECXL was performed in patients with 'epithelium on' minimal pachymetry between 350 µm to 450 µm. Main outcome measures included change in maximum keratometry (Kmax), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and efficacy in halting progression (increase in Kmax ≥ 1 diopter [D]).

RESULTS

Standard 'epi -off' CXL, CACXL and TECXL was performed in 34,14 and 10 eyes respectively. Baseline Kmax and CDVA were comparable for all groupsKmax reduced significantly by -2.83 ± 3.35 D, -3.18 ± 2.74D and -2.02 ± 1.66 D in standard 'epi-off' CXL (p<0.01), CACXL (p=0.001) and TECXL (p=0.004) groups respectively; the reduction was comparable for all groups (p=0.63). CDVA improved by -0.14 ± 0.24 , -0.04 ± 0.19 and -0.12 ± 0.17 logMAR units in the standard 'epi -off' CXL (p =0.006), CACXL (p=0.42) and TECXL (p=0.05) groups respectively; the reduction was comparable for all groups (p=0.46). Progression was documented in 2 eyes (6%) of the standard 'epi -off' CXL group and 0% eyes of the CACXL and TECXL groups (p=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

CACXL and TECXL were comparable to standard 'epi -off' CXL for progressive keratoconus.

Corneal Cross-Linking for Paediatric Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

All corneal cross-linking techniques attenuated disease progression in patients with pediatric keratoconus for at least one year based on a meta-analysis. A standard and accelerated technique led to marked improvement in visual acuity. We determined the efficacy and safety of corneal cross-linking (CXL) in pediatric keratoconus by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched for relevant studies on the effects of standard, transepithelial, and/or accelerated CXL protocols in patients aged 18 years or younger. Standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to compare the data collected at baseline and 12 months. The primary outcomes were maximum keratometry (Kmax) and uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and the secondary outcomes were the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and manifest refraction spherical equivalent or cylindrical refraction. Our search yielded 7913 publications, of which 26 were included in our systematic review and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. Standard CXL significantly improved the Kmax, UCVA, and BCVA, and significantly decreased the TCT. Accelerated CXL significantly improved UCVA and BCVA. In the transepithelial and accelerated-transepithelial CXL methods, each measurable parameter did not change after treatments. All CXL techniques attenuated disease progression in patients with pediatric keratoconus for at least one year. Standard and accelerated CXL led to marked improvement in visual acuity.

Biomechanics of Ophthalmic Crosslinking

Crosslinking involves the formation of bonds between polymer chains, such as proteins. In biological tissues, these bonds tend to stiffen the tissue, making it more resistant to mechanical degradation and deformation. In ophthalmology, the crosslinking phenomenon is being increasingly harnessed and explored as a treatment strategy for treating corneal ectasias, keratitis, degenerative myopia, and glaucoma. This review surveys the multitude of exogenous crosslinking strategies reported in the literature, both "light" (involving light energy) and "dark" (involving non-photic chemical processes), and explores their mechanisms, cytotoxicity, and stage of translational development. The spectrum of ophthalmic applications described in the literature is then discussed, with particular attention to proposed therapeutic mechanisms in the cornea and sclera. The mechanical effects of crosslinking are then discussed in the context of their proposed site and scale of action. Biomechanical characterization of the crosslinking effect is needed to more thoroughly address knowledge gaps in this area, and a review of reported methods for biomechanical characterization is presented with an attempt to assess the sensitivity of each method to crosslinking-mediated changes using data from the experimental and clinical literature. Biomechanical measurement methods differ in spatial resolution, mechanical sensitivity, suitability for detecting crosslinking subtypes, and translational readiness and are central to the effort to understand the mechanistic link between crosslinking methods and clinical outcomes of candidate therapies. Data on differences in the biomechanical effect of different crosslinking protocols and their correspondence to clinical outcomes are reviewed, and strategies for leveraging measurement advances predicting clinical outcomes of crosslinking procedures are discussed. Advancing the understanding of ophthalmic crosslinking, its biomechanical underpinnings, and its applications supports the development of next-generation crosslinking procedures that optimize therapeutic effect while reducing complications.

The efficiency and safety of oxygen-supplemented accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking

PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of oxygen delivery on the clinical outcomes of accelerated transepithelial corneal cross-linking (A-TE CXL).

METHODS

Fifty-seven eyes of 44 progressive keratoconus (KCN) patients were randomly separated into two age-sex-matched groups. Twenty-nine eyes of 23 KCN patients that underwent oxygen-supplemented A-TE CXL formed the study group and 28 eyes of 21 patients treated with the same procedure but under room air conditions formed the control group. All patients were examined preoperatively, one, six and twelve months after the procedure. The logMAR spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), maximum keratometry (Kmax), mean keratometry, apical posterior keratometry, cylindrical power, minimum central corneal thickness, keratoconus vertex front and back, ocular aberrations, endothelial cell density (ECD), demarcation line depth (DLD) and proportion measures were recorded for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

The preoperative, 1st, 6th and 12th months mean Kmax values of the study group were 55.14 ± 3.99D, 54.85 ± 3.82D, 54.37 ± 3.84D and 54.40 ± 3.86, respectively, and 54.47 ± 3.17D, 54.52 ± 2.97D, 54.25 ± 2.95D and 54.20 ± 2.97 in the control group. The mean Kmax value was decreased significantly more in the oxygen-supplemented group after 12 months compared to the control group (p = 0.019). The mean DLD was also significantly deeper in the study group (320 ± 17 µm) compared to the control group (269 ± 19 µm). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of ECD alterations at any of the time intervals (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Keratoconus progression was significantly halted in both groups 12 months after the treatment. In addition, oxygen supplementation during A-TE CXL further significantly increased clinical outcomes compared to room air conditions without any significant change in ECD measures.

Transepithelial versus epithelium-off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus

BACKGROUND

Keratoconus is the most common corneal dystrophy. It can cause loss of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity through ectasia (thinning) of the central or paracentral cornea, irregular corneal scarring, or corneal perforation. Disease onset usually occurs in the second to fourth decade of life, periods of peak educational attainment or career development. The condition is lifelong and sight-threatening. Corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) using ultraviolet A (UVA) light applied to the cornea is the only treatment that has been shown to slow progression of disease. The original, more widely known technique involves application of UVA light to de-epithelialized cornea, to which a photosensitizer (riboflavin) is added topically throughout the irradiation process. Transepithelial CXL is a recently advocated alternative to the standard CXL procedure, in that the epithelium is kept intact during CXL. Retention of the epithelium offers the putative advantages of faster healing, less patient discomfort, faster visual rehabilitation, and less risk of corneal haze.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of transepithelial CXL compared with epithelium-off CXL for progressive keratoconus.

SEARCH METHODS

To identify potentially eligible studies, we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register) (2020, Issue 1); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase.com; PubMed; Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature database (LILACS); ClinicalTrials.gov; and World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). We did not impose any date or language restrictions. We last searched the electronic databases on 15 January 2020.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which transepithelial CXL had been compared with epithelium-off CXL in participants with progressive keratoconus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 13 studies with 723 eyes of 578 participants enrolled; 13 to 119 participants were enrolled per study. Seven studies were conducted in Europe, three in the Middle East, and one each in India, Russia, and Turkey. Seven studies were parallel-group RCTs, one study was an RCT with a paired-eyes design, and five studies were RCTs in which both eyes of some or all participants were assigned to the same intervention. Eleven studies compared transepithelial CXL with epithelium-off CXL in participants with progressive keratoconus. There was no evidence of an important difference between intervention groups in maximum keratometry (denoted 'maximum K' or 'Kmax'; also known as steepest keratometry measurement) at 12 months or later (mean difference (MD) 0.99 diopters (D), 95% CI -0.11 to 2.09; 5 studies; 177 eyes; I² = 41%; very low certainty evidence). Few studies described other outcomes of interest. The evidence is very uncertain that epithelium-off CXL may have a small (data from two studies were not pooled due to considerable heterogeneity (I² = 92%)) or no effect on stabilization of progressive keratoconus compared with transepithelial CXL; comparison of the estimated proportions of eyes with decreases or increases of 2 or more diopters in maximum K at 12 months from one study with 61 eyes was RR 0.32 (95% CI 0.09 to 1.12) and RR (non-event) 0.86 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.00), respectively (very low certainty). We did not estimate an overall effect on corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA) because substantial heterogeneity was detected (I² = 70%). No study evaluated CDVA gain or loss of 10 or more letters on a logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) chart. Transepithelial CXL may result in little to no difference in CDVA at 12 months or beyond. Four studies reported that either no adverse events or no serious adverse events had been observed. Another study noted no change in endothelial cell count after either procedure. Moderate certainty evidence from 4 studies (221 eyes) found that epithelium-off CXL resulted in a slight increase in corneal haze or scarring when compared to transepithelial CXL (RR (non-event) 1.07, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.14). Three studies, one of which had three arms, compared outcomes among participants assigned to transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis versus those assigned to epithelium-off CXL. No conclusive evidence was found for either keratometry or visual acuity outcomes at 12 months or later after surgery. Low certainty evidence suggests that transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis results in no difference in logMAR CDVA (MD 0.00 letter, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04; 2 studies; 51 eyes). Only one study examined gain or loss of 10 or more logMAR letters. In terms of adverse events, one case of subepithelial infiltrate was reported after transepithelial CXL with iontophoresis, whereas two cases of faint corneal scars and four cases of permanent haze were observed after epithelium-off CXL. Vogt's striae were found in one eye after each intervention. The certainty of the evidence was low or very low for the outcomes in this comparison due to imprecision of estimates for all outcomes and risk of bias in the studies from which data have been reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Because of lack of precision, frequent indeterminate risk of bias due to inadequate reporting, and inconsistency in outcomes measured and reported among studies in this systematic review, it remains unknown whether transepithelial CXL, or any other approach, may confer an advantage over epithelium-off CXL for patients with progressive keratoconus with respect to further progression of keratoconus, visual acuity outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Arrest of the progression of keratoconus should be the primary outcome of interest in future trials of CXL, particularly when comparing the effectiveness of different approaches to CXL. Furthermore, methods of assessing and defining progressive keratoconus should be standardized. Trials with longer follow-up are required in order to assure that outcomes are measured after corneal wound-healing and stabilization of keratoconus. In addition, perioperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care should be standardized to permit meaningful comparisons of CXL methods. Methods to increase penetration of riboflavin through intact epithelium as well as delivery of increased dose of UVA may be needed to improve outcomes. PROs should be measured and reported. The visual significance of adverse outcomes, such as corneal haze, should be assessed and correlated with other outcomes, including PROs.

Safety and efficacy of repeated crosslinking assisted by transepithelial double-cycle iontophoresis in keratoconus progression after primary corneal crosslinking

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated corneal collagen crosslinking assisted by transepithelial double-cycle iontophoresis (DI-CXL) in the management of keratoconus progression after primary CXL.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted in the patients who underwent repeated CXL between 2016 and 2018. These patients were treated with DI-CXL if keratoconus progression was confirmed after primary CXL. Scoring of ocular pain and corneal epithelial damage, visual acuity, corneal tomography, in vivo corneal confocal microscopy (IVCM) was performed before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after DI-CXL.

RESULTS

Overall, 21 eyes of 12 patients (mean age 17.3 ± 1.9 years) were included in this study. Before DI-CXL, an average increase of 4.26 D in K_max was detected in these patients with a mean follow-up interval of (23.0 ± 13.7) months. After DI-CXL, corneal epithelial damage rapidly recovered within days. Visual acuity remained unchanged with follow-up of 24 months. When compared to baseline, significant decreases were observed in K_max (at 3 months) and K2 (at 3 and 6 months) after DI-CXL. Corneal thickness of thinnest point significantly decreased at 3 months postoperatively. When compared to baseline, no significant differences were found in any of the refractive or tomographic parameters at 12 and 24 months. IVCM revealed trabecular patterned hyperdense tissues after DI-CXL in the anterior stroma at the depth of 200 μm or more. No corneal infiltration or persistent epithelial defect was recorded after DI-CXL.

CONCLUSION

DI-CXL is safe and effective as a good alternative in stabilizing keratoconus progression after primary CXL.

Keratoconus: cross-linking the window of the eye

Keratoconus is a condition in which the cornea progressively thins and weakens, leading to severe, irregular astigmatism and a significant reduction in quality of life. Although the precise cause of keratoconus is still not known, biochemical and structural studies indicate that overactive enzymes within the cornea break down the constituent proteins (collagen and proteoglycans) and cause the tissue to weaken. As the disease develops, collagen fibres slip past each other and are redistributed across the cornea, causing it to change shape. In recent years, it was discovered that the photochemical induction of cross-links within the corneal extracellular matrix, through the use of riboflavin and ultraviolet (UVA) light, could increase the strength and enzymatic resistance of the tissue and thereby halt keratoconus progression. Worldwide acceptance and use of riboflavin/UVA corneal cross-linking therapy for halting keratoconus progression has increased rapidly, in accordance with the growing body of evidence supporting its long-term effectiveness. This review focusses on the inception of riboflavin/UVA corneal cross-linking therapy for keratoconus, its clinical effectiveness and the latest scientific advances aimed at reducing patient treatment time, improving patient comfort and increasing patient eligibility for treatment.

Plain language summary

Review of current treatments using cross-linking to halt the progress of keratoconus Keratoconus is a disease in which the curved cornea, the transparent window at the front of the eye, weakens, bulges forward into a cone-shape and becomes thinner. This change of curvature means that light is not focussed onto the retina correctly and vision is progressively impaired. Traditionally, the effects of early keratoconus were alleviated by using glasses, specialist contact lenses, rings inserted into the cornea and in severe cases, by performing a corneal transplant. However, it was discovered that by inducing chemical bonds called cross-links within the cornea, the tissue could be strengthened and further thinning and shape changes prevented. The standard cross-linking procedure takes over an hour to perform and involves the removal of the cells at the front of the cornea, followed by the application of Vitamin B2 eye drops and low energy ultraviolet light (UVA) to create new cross-links within the tissue. Clinical trials have shown this standard procedure to be safe and effective at halting keratoconus progression. However, there are many treatment modifications currently under investigation that aim to reduce patient treatment time and increase comfort, such as accelerated cross-linking procedures and protocols that do not require removal of the surface cells. This review describes the different techniques being developed to carry out corneal cross-linking efficiently and painlessly, to halt keratoconus progression and avoid the need for expensive surgery.

Cool Crosslinking: Riboflavin at 4°C for Pain Management After Crosslinking for Keratoconus Patients, A Randomized Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

To explore corneal cooling as a method of pain management in corneal-accelerated collagen cross-linking.

METHODS

This was a prospective and interventional randomized clinical trial registered in the National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials through the identifier NCT030760770. The research was conducted at the Institute of Ophthalmology "Conde de Valenciana." A total of 98 patients were randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups: cold riboflavin (4°C) group or control group (riboflavin at room temperature). The inclusion criteria were patients of any sex, older than 18 years of age with keratoconus diagnosis who needed management with cross-linking in both eyes because of the evidence of progression. The exclusion criteria were patients who had cross-linking without epithelial debridement, unilateral cross-linking, or any other ocular pathologies besides keratoconus and any cognitive incapacity that would make the understanding of the pain test difficult. The main outcome measures were pain, tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation, and irritation.

RESULTS

At 2 hours post-op, pain in the case and control groups was 3.80 ± 3.00 and 8.08 ± 2.21 (P < 0.05), tearing was 1.56 ± 1.96 and 8.29 ± 2.42 (P < 0.05), photophobia was 5.44 ± 3.57 and 7.83 ± 2.64 (P < 0.05), foreign body sensation was 2.20 ± 2.78 and 6.54 ± 2.73 (P < 0.05), and irritation was 3.48 ± 2.98 and 6.79 ± 3.00 (P < 0.05), respectively. A statistical significant difference was maintained in pain values on day 1 (2.79 ± 3.09 and 4.91 ± 3.27 [P < 0.05]), 2 (2.54 ± 2.41 and 4.00 ± 2.43 [P < 0.05]), and 4 (0.45 ± 0.76 and 1.22 ± 1.67 [P < 0.05]).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that pain and associated symptoms decreased significantly in the riboflavin 4°C group.

Transepithelial versus Epithelium-off Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Corneal Ectasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

TOPIC

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transepithelial corneal cross-linking in comparison with the established epithelium-off technique for corneal ectasia.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Considerable debate exists regarding whether transepithelial and epithelium-off cross-linking are comparable in their safety and efficacy.

METHODS

We searched 16 electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the grey literature, current to July 8, 2020, for randomized controlled trials comparing transepithelial and epithelium-off cross-linking for corneal ectasia. We excluded studies evaluating cross-linking for nonectatic indications, as well as non-randomized controlled trials. Our primary outcome was the change in maximal keratometry (K_max) at 12 months after cross-linking, and we considered additional topographic, visual, and safety outcomes. We summarized our analyses by calculating weighted mean differences (MDs) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes and relative risks (RRs) with corresponding 95% CIs for dichotomous outcomes. We conducted trial sequential analysis to determine whether the required information size was met for each outcome. The quality of individual trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias assessment tool, and the evidence was assessed at an outcome level using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

RESULTS

Twelve studies totaling 966 eyes were eligible. A significant difference was found between transepithelial and epithelium-off cross-linking groups in the change in K_max at 12 months (MD, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.23-1.28; P = 0.004; primary outcome) and at longest follow-up (MD, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.62-1.77; P < 0.001; secondary outcome) after treatment. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups when examining uncorrected distance visual acuity (MD, 0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.14; P = 0.386) or corrected distance visual acuity (MD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.06 to 0.09; P = 0.732). Transepithelial cross-linking was associated with significantly fewer complications than the epithelium-off approach (RR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.06-0.79; P = 0.020), although it was associated with an increased rate of disease progression at 12 months after treatment (RR, 4.49; 95% CI, 1.24-16.25; P = 0.022). The required information size was met for our primary outcome and trial sequential analysis supported the conventional meta-analysis. The quality of evidence was rated as moderate using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology.

DISCUSSION

The efficacy of transepithelial cross-linking remains inferior to the epithelium-off approach, although it is significantly safer.

Visual and Topographic Improvement with Epithelium-On, Oxygen-Supplemented, Customized Corneal Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus

Customized cross-linking has been proposed as an alternative to conventional cross-linking in patients with progressive keratoconus, targeting greater flattening of the cone region and improved visual function. Epithelium-on cross-linking aims to reduce complications associated with epithelial removal, while the addition of oxygen aims to maintain treatment effect. Our study evaluates the combination of these novel treatment strategies to achieve a minimally invasive treatment targeting maximal functional outcomes. This prospective study included 42 eyes undergoing epithelium-on, accelerated, oxygen-supplemented, customized corneal cross-linking for progressive keratoconus. Outcome measures, including refraction, visual acuity, and corneal tomography were obtained at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) uncorrected visual acuity was significantly improved, from 0.87 ± 0.53 preoperatively, to 0.78 ± 0.56 1 year postoperatively (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.016). LogMAR best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was also significantly improved, from 0.19 ± 0.36 preoperatively, to 0.11 ± 0.33 postoperatively (p = 0.004). Manifest refractive cylinder was significantly decreased, from 4.50 ± 2.96 D preoperatively, to 3.27 ± 2.61 D postoperatively (p = 0.004). The baseline maximum keratometry (Kmax) was 53.04 ± 7.91 D, significantly flattening to 52.25 ± 7.31 D by 1 month, and remaining relatively stable at 1 year postoperatively (52.31 ± 7.50 D) (p < 0.001). No significant adverse events occurred in any eye. Epithelium-on, accelerated, oxygen-supplemented, customized corneal cross-linking is a promising new treatment approach, with reduced maximum keratometry, reduced astigmatism, and improved visual acuity at 1 year, with a favorable safety and patient comfort profile.

Nonlinear optical crosslinking (NLO CXL) for correcting refractive errors

Ultraviolet A (UVA) light-based photoactivation of riboflavin (Rf) to induce corneal crosslinking (CXL) and mechanical stiffening is now a well-known treatment for corneal ectasia and Keratoconus that is being used in a topographically guided photorefractive intrastromal CXL (PiXL) procedure to treat low degrees of refractive errors. Alternative approaches for non-invasive treatment of refractive errors have also been proposed that use femtosecond lasers (FS) that provide much faster, more precise, and safer results than UVA CXL. One such treatment, nonlinear optical crosslinking (NLO CXL), has been able to replicate the effects of UVA CXL, while producing a smaller area of cellular damage and requiring a shorter procedure time. Unlike UVA CXL, the treatment volume of NLO CXL only occurs within the focal volume of the laser, which can be placed at any depth and scanned into any pattern for true topographically guided refractive correction. This review presents our experience with using FS lasers to photoactivate Rf and perform highly controlled corneal CXL that leads to mechanical stiffening and changes in corneal shape.

Enhanced Transepithelial Riboflavin Delivery Using Femtosecond Laser-Machined Epithelial Microchannels

Purpose

This study describes a femtosecond laser (FS) approach to machine corneal epithelial microchannels for enhancing riboflavin (Rf) penetration into the cornea prior to corneal crosslinking (CXL).

Methods

Using a 1030-nm FS laser with 5- to 10-µJ pulse energy, the corneal epithelium of slaughterhouse rabbit eyes was machined to create 2-µm-diameter by 25-µm-long microchannels at a density of 100 or 400 channels/mm². Rf penetration through the microchannels was then determined by applying 1% Rf in phosphate-buffered saline for 30 minutes followed by removal of the cornea and extraction from the central stromal button. Stromal Rf concentrations were then compared to those obtained using standard epithelial debridement or 0.01% benzalkonium chloride (BAK) to disrupt the epithelial barrier.

Results

Microchannels formed using a 5-µJ/pulse at a density of 400 channels/mm² achieved a stromal Rf concentration that was 50% of that achieved by removal of the corneal epithelium and imbibing with 1% Rf. Stromal Rf levels were also equal to that of debrided corneas soaked with 0.5% Rf, threefold higher than those soaked with 0.1% Rf, and twofold higher than corneas soaked in BAK without epithelial debridement. Organ culture of treated corneas showed a normal corneal epithelium following FS machining while BAK-treated corneas showed extensive epithelial and stromal damage at 24 hours posttreatment.

Conclusions

FS corneal epithelial machining can be used to enhance penetration of Rf into the stroma for corneal CXL.

Translational Relevance

The creation of epithelial microchannels allows for stromal Rf concentrations high enough to perform true transepithelial crosslinking.

A prospective evaluation of photorefractive intrastromal cross-linking for the treatment of low-grade myopia

PURPOSE

To evaluate photorefractive intrastromal cross-linking (PiXL) treatment for low-grade myopia, comparing three treatment protocols.

METHODS

Healthy individuals, 25.6 ± 3.6 years of age, with low-grade myopia underwent epi-on PiXL with either: 4-mm zone treated in high oxygen environment (4 mm-HIGH; n = 15), 4-mm/room air (4-mm LOW; n = 6), or 6-mm/high oxygen (6-mm HIGH; n = 6). Efficacy was determined by change in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) and corneal curvature (K_mean ) over a 12-month follow-up. Safety was determined by best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), corneal endothelial cell loss and registration of side-effects.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects were included. Due to insufficient effect with the 4-mm LOW treatment and an unacceptable degree of initial light sensitivity/ocular irritation in the 6-mm HIGH group, the inclusions to these treatments were stopped after inclusion of 6 patients in each group. The 4-mm HIGH treatment showed a significantly larger improvement in UCVA (-0.45 ± 0.27 LogMAR) and MRSE (+0.99 ± 0.44 D) at 1, 6 and 12 months compared with the 4-mm LOW treatment (p < 0.05). At 12 months posttreatment, endothelial cell count and BSCVA were unaltered. More initial side-effects were noted with the 6-mm HIGH treatment, compared with the 4-mm HIGH treatment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Epi-on PiXL may become a safe and effective non-ablative treatment for low-grade myopia. The effect is augmented by high oxygen environment and remains stable for 12 months. The initial ocular irritation is acceptable with a 4-mm treatment zone. The present results justify further clinical studies on PiXL, including refinements of the technique and long-term results.