Iris hooks versus a pupil expansion ring: Operating times, complications, and visual acuity outcomes in small pupil cases

Exploring the impact of pupil expansion techniques on cataract surgery: unveiling key complications and clinical outcomes: a comparative analysis of 1266 eyes

BACKGROUND

In cataract surgery, inadequate pupil dilation presents a major surgical challenge by narrowing the operation field and restricting visibility and movement. We aim to compare cataract surgery complication rates and clinical outcomes using different pupil expansion methods.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study grouped patients according to four techniques of mechanical pupil expansion techniques: sphincterotomy (N = 339), iris stretching (N = 242), iris hooks (N = 391) and expansion rings (N = 294). Incidences and odds ratios for major complications and outcomes were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

This single-center study included 1266 adult patients who underwent routine cataract surgery with mechanical pupil dilatation. The mean (± SD) age was 75.5 (± 13.0) years and 727 (57%) patients were male. The risk of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) did not differ between the groups. Iris hooks were associated with the highest incidence of posterior capsular rupture (PCR) (3.3%) as compared to sphincterotomy, stretching and expansion rings (0.9%, 0.4% and 1.4%, respectively, P = 0.016). However, this effect was not supported by multivariable analysis. Zonular dialysis tended to be higher among eyes operated with iris hooks and pupil expansion rings, compared with iris stretching and sphincterotomy (2.0% and 1.7%, respectively, P = 0.058) and was found to be independently associated with a specific mechanical pupil expansion method on multivariable analysis (P = 0.050). No differences were observed for other complications, intraocular pressure or best-corrected visual acuity (VA) gain. Surgeon seniority was a significant protective factor from postoperative uveitis on multivariable analysis (P = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Our large cohort study found no difference between the groups regarding major complications or clinical outcomes, suggesting that all four methods may be equally safe.

KEY MESSAGES

WHAT IS KNOWN : • In cataract surgery, inadequate pupil dilation presents a major surgical challenge by narrowing the operation field and restricting visibility and movement. • Different pupil dilation methods have been used, ranged from topical and intracameral mydriatics and visco-mydriasis to mechanical dilation maneuvers. • Four principal techniques of mechanical pupil expansion, including sphincterotomies, manual iris stretching, iris retracting hooks and pupil expansion rings, are available.

WHAT IS NEW

• This single-center study included 1266 adult patients found no difference between the groups regarding major complications or clinical outcomes such as pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME), posterior capsular rupture, zonular dialysis, intraocular pressure, uveitis or best-corrected visual acuity gain. • Surgeon seniority was a significant protective factor from postoperative uveitis.

Eight-Chop Technique in Phacoemulsification Using Iris Hooks for Patients with Cataracts and Small Pupils

Objectives: This study investigated the efficacy and safety of performing phacoemulsification using the eight-chop technique with iris hooks in patients with small pupils. Methods: The iris hooks and control groups each included 65 eyes. Cataract surgeries were performed using the eight-chop technique. The operative time, phaco time, aspiration time, cumulative dissipated energy, and volume of fluid used were measured. Best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell density (CECD), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: In total, 130 eyes of 107 patients (mean age, 75.9 ± 7.1 years; 58 men, 72 women) with cataracts were evaluated. The mean operative time, phaco time, aspiration time, cumulative dissipated energy, and volume of fluid used were 10.6 min, 20.7 s, 101.1 s, 7.8, and 38.0 mL, respectively, in the iris hooks group and 4.6 min, 16.2 s, 72.1 s, 7.0, and 28.9 mL, respectively, in the control group. The decrease in CECD at 19 weeks postoperatively was 2.1% and 1.2% for the iris hooks and control groups, respectively. In both groups, IOP decreased significantly (all p < 0.01) at 7 and 19 weeks postoperatively. No intraoperative complications were found in either group. Conclusions: The eight-chop technique using iris hooks resulted in a small postoperative reduction in CECD and excellent values for intraoperative outcome measures. In addition, those cataract surgeries were very short, efficient, and safe, without complications. The eight-chop technique using iris hooks could provide an ideal solution for patients with small pupils.

A randomized control study on post-operative iris distortion following small-pupil cataract surgery using B-HEX pupil expander versus Malyugin ring

Background

The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative pupil distortion following small pupil cataract surgeries performed using B-HEX and Malyugin rings (MR).

Methods

A randomized control trial was conducted from June 2020 to June 2023 at a tertiary eye-care hospital. The study consisted of 64 participants for cataract surgery with small pupil. There were two groups, one undergoing surgery with the use of B-HEX pupil expander and other with MR intraoperatively and the rest of the surgery was proceeded as per the convention. Areas of preoperative and postoperative images was calculated, put into an online software and pupil distortion was calculated in percentage. Two-tailed t-test was used to see the difference between the two groups.

Results

Mean age at presentation was 70.5 ± 10.12 years. Most common cause for small pupil was tamsulosin therapy. Mean size of small-pupil was 3.0 ± 1.1 mm. With the application of two rings, mean pupillary area preoperatively was 4178.23 ± 1589.46 and postoperatively was 6100.44 ± 2658.28 following the use of MR, respectively and 30,002.93 ± 13,193.40 preoperatively and 37,648.26 ± 15,207.01 postoperatively following the use of B-Hex ring respectively. Comparing baseline area from pupillary area at 1-month follow-up, a significant increase was noted for both the rings. Also, MR caused significantly more pupillary distortion compared to B-HEX ring (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

MR causes significantly more pupillary distortion in the postoperative period compared to B-HEX ring. Though, both the rings cause pupillary distortion, these devices expand the surgical area adequately, ease the procedure, decrease risk of complications achieving good functional visual outcomes.

Comparison of pupil expansion devices in small pupil phacoemulsification

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of phacoemulsification in small pupils (≤4 mm) using pupil expansion devices at a tertiary eye care center in South India.

METHODS

The study design is prospective, randomized, comparative, and interventional. Mechanical pupil dilatation with iris retractors (group I), B-HEX ring (group II), and Gupta ring (group III) was compared with respect to pupil size achieved (intraoperative), total surgical time, device addition time, complications, endothelial cell loss, and postoperative best corrected visual acuity.

RESULTS

Among 36 participants (12 in each group), the mean pupil size, total surgical time, and device addition time were maximum with iris retractors. Intraoperatively, sphincter tear was seen in two eyes in the iris retractors group and one eye in the Gupta ring group. In the B-HEX ring group, only two flanges of the ring could be engaged in two participants, one patient had iris bleeding (during stretching of the iris), and one patient had anterior lens capsular tear. Among all three groups, there was no statistically significant difference in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell count, and coefficient of variation obtained in the preoperative period, postoperative Day 7 and Day 30, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study, in more than 50% of cases, the cause of small pupil was idiopathic/senile. Among nonidiopathic causes, PXF was the most common association. Although iris retractors are cost-effective and give maximum intraoperative dilatation, there is a need of four additional side ports to be made, thus increasing the total surgical time and device addition time. On the other hand, B-HEX and Gupta ring provide comparable intraoperative dilation and device addition time and also have comparable postoperative outcomes in terms of postoperative pupil size and complications.

Axial length and pharmacologic pupillary dilation in highly myopic patients

PURPOSE

To determine how high myopia impacts pharmacological pupillary dilation, and to evaluate the relationship between the extent of pharmacologic pupillary dilation and axial length.

METHODS

Patients were grouped into high myopes, defined as one or both eyes having a refractive error greater than - 6 diopters, and controls (between - 2 and + 2 diopters). Dilation was achieved with 1 drop each of tropicamide 1% and phenylephrine 2.5%. Pupil size was measured at full and dim light prior to dilation, then 15 and 30 min after dilation. Biometry was measured for each patient. Statistical analyses were performed using the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon tests, two-sample Welch's t-tests, and linear mixed effect models and generalized estimating equations models accounting for inter-eye correlation.

RESULTS

Forty patients (20 high myopes and 20 controls, 80 eyes total) participated in the study. High myopes had larger pupils at baseline and achieved significantly greater pupillary size (7.08 mm, 95% CI: 6.97 to 7.19 mm) than controls (6.23 mm, 95% CI: 5.94 to 6.52 mm) after 30 min of dilation (P < .0005). Fully dilated pupil size at 30 min was significantly correlated with both refractive error (r =  - 0.57, P < .0005) and axial length (r = 0.47, P < .0005). Generalized estimating equations and linear mixed effect models identified other predictive variables of pupil size after dilation including age and white-to-white diameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Highly myopic patients dilate to a larger pupillary size compared to other patients. Predicting dilation based on extent of myopia could facilitate intraocular surgery planning and reduce clinic wait times for myopic patients.

Surgical time and efficacy of illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of the illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery in terms of shortening the surgical time in eyes with miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment.

METHODS

As retrospective study, three hundred thirty-six eyes of 336 consecutive patients who underwent the femtosecond laser and illuminated chopper-assisted cataract surgery were included. Cases with pupil less than 6 mm after femtosecond laser pretreatment were included in the miosis group. Pupil diameter, surgical time, and improved efficacy (100/surgical time×pupil size) were compared between eyes with and without miosis.

RESULTS

Of 336 eyes, 20 were included in the miosis group (6.0%). Pupil diameter was smaller in eyes with miosis than in those without miosis (5.23 ± 0.38 mm vs 7.35 ± 0.64 mm, p < 0.001); however, surgical time was not different (6.86 ± 0.73 min vs 6.60 ± 1.27 min, p = 0.071) between the two groups. Mechanical pupil dilations were not needed in any cases. As a result, improved efficacy was calculated to be higher in patients with miosis (2.83 vs 2.14, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In terms of surgical time and improved efficacy, using the illuminated chopper simplified cataract surgery involving miosis after femtosecond laser pretreatment. The use of an illuminated chopper is expected to be a good solution for femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgeries.

Complications of pupil expansion devices: a large real-world study

Purpose

To assess the risk for uveitis, pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME), and posterior capsular opacification (PCO) associated with the use of pupil expansion devices in cataract surgery.

Design

A retrospective comparative cohort study.

Participants

Patients who underwent routine cataract surgery with and without pupil expansion devices at the Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, UK, between January 2008 and December 2017.

Methods

This study included 39,460 eyes operated without a pupil expansion device and 699 eyes operated with the device. Odds ratios for uveitis and PCME when using a pupil expansion device were calculated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis, having age, gender, diabetes, pseudoexfoliation, and pupil expansion device as independent variables. Multivariate Cox regression controlling for age and gender was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for Nd : YAG laser capsulotomies.

Results

Postoperative uveitis and PCME were reported in 3.9% and 2.7% of the eyes operated with a pupil expansion device compared to 2.3% and 1.3% operated without the device (p=0.005 and p=0.002, respectively). In univariate regression analysis, eyes with pupil expansion devices showed a higher risk of postoperative uveitis or PMCE after cataract surgery (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.39-2.55, p<0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, the risk for PMCE was greater among diabetic patients and in eyes with a pupil expansion device than in those without (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.24-1.83, P<0.001; OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.16-3.11, P=0.01). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for the patient's age and gender, the use of a pupil expansion device was associated with higher Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy rates (HR 1.316, 95%CI 1.011-1.714, P=0.041).

Conclusion

In our large cohort study, the use of pupil expansion devices in cataract surgery was associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Effective anti-inflammatory treatment and follow-up are warranted in eyes operated with a pupil expansion device.

The impact of case complexity in resident-performed cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association of capsular dye and/or a pupil expansion device (PED) usage on the rate of major complication in resident-performed cataract extraction.

METHODS

Resident cataract surgeries between 2016 and 2019 were included. The primary outcomes were anterior or posterior vitrectomy (AVx and PPVx). Cases were grouped by the use of a PED and/or capsular staining along with additional preoperative risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,348 cases, 371 (27.5%) documented capsular staining ("Dye-only"), 91 (6.8%) required pupil expansion ("PED-only"), and 100 (7.4%) used both capsular stain and a PED ("Both"). The remainder of cases (n=786, 58.3%) were classified as "Routine." Compared to the "Routine" group, "PED-only" and "Both" had significantly higher odds of an AVx (OR=2.90, 95% CI 1.27-6.19, P=0.01) and/or a PPVx (OR=2.33, 95% CI 1.07-5.12, P=0.04). Among the PPVx cases, the "PED-only" group has significantly higher odds than "Routine" and "Dye-only" (OR=4.64, 95% CI 1.68-12.79, P=0.01; and OR=6.48, 95% CI 1.7-25.0, P=0.005, respectively). In case-control analysis, vision, intraocular pressure, anterior chamber depth, axial length, cataract type, or severity had no significant overall association with complication. When compared to nuclear sclerotic cataract, posterior subcapsular (OR=7.86, 95% CI 1.46-42.47, P=0.017) and white/mature cataracts (OR=3.05, 95% CI 1.1-8.43, P=0.032) had increased odds of complication.

CONCLUSION

Resident-performed cataract surgery frequently required capsular staining and/or a PED, and intuitively, these cases had a higher overall complication rate compared to routine cases. However, the use of a PED independently was associated with significantly higher odds of a major complication requiring an unplanned vitrectomy independent of predisposing factors.

Dilation devices in cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cataract surgery in the setting of small pupil represent a major challenge and it is associated with a higher risk of complications. When pharmacologic pupil dilation fails, mechanical pupil expansion devices are needed to obtain and maintain sufficient intraoperative mydriasis. The purpose of this review is to assess the pupil expansion devices currently available.

RECENT FINDINGS

A variety of pupil expansion devices are offered on the market. They differ for design, material, shape, size, cost, and easiness of insertion/removal, nonetheless they all seem to be effective in improving the pupil size and easing the cataract surgery.

SUMMARY

Mechanical pupil expansion can be effectively achieved with a variety of devices, which are well tolerated and can facilitate cataract surgery in the setting of poor mydriasis.

The safety of intracameral phenylephrine - A systematic review

Intracameral phenylephrine is commonly used in ophthalmic surgery as an alternative or supplement to mydriatic eye drops; hence, the importance of an evidence-based understanding of its risk-benefit profile is vital. We performed a comprehensive search in the PubMed, Google Scholar and Cochrane databases for published studies and case reports relating to the use of intracameral phenylephrine. Articles from 1958 to 2021 with the following keywords were used: "intracameral phenylephrine", "intracameral mydriatics", "phenylephrine", "pupil dilation", "complications". Intracameral phenylephrine was first used in 2003 as an alternative to topical mydriatics. Since then, it is being increasingly used with a variety of benefits, including rapid onset of mydriasis, and cost-effectiveness. There are various case reports, however, of ocular and systemic complications associated with intracameral phenylephrine such as generation of free radicals, toxic anterior segment syndrome, inconsistent pupillary dilation during surgery, and ventricular fibrillation. Alternatives to intracameral phenylephrine such as iris hooks, a Malyugin ring, intracameral epinephrine, and intracameral tropicamide were compared with intracameral phenylephrine. Intracameral phenylephrine appears to have a good safety profile.

Relationship Between Tamsulosin Use and Surgical Complications of Cataract Surgery in Elderly Patients: Population-Based Cohort Study

Purpose

Although several previous studies have investigated the relationship between tamsulosin use and surgical complications of cataract surgery, no population-based cohort study has been conducted for the Asian population. We aimed to investigate the relationship between tamsulosin use and surgical complications of cataract surgery in the Korean elderly population.

Methods

This nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study included elderly patients (≥60 years) who had undergone cataract surgery in the period from 2003 to 2015. Baseline characteristics were age, sex, income, residence, and systemic, and ocular comorbidities (glaucoma, myopia, eye trauma, diabetes mellitus with ophthalmic manifestations, severe cataract, age-related macular degeneration). The exposure of interest was tamsulosin use within 1 year before cataract surgery. Logistic regression model was used to evaluate the relationship of tamsulosin use with surgical complications of cataract surgery.

Results

The rate of surgical complications of cataract surgery was 0.88% (375/42,539) in the non-tamsulosin group and 0.83% (71/8,510) in the tamsulosin group. The groups showed no significant difference in the risk of surgical complications of cataract surgery in the unadjusted model [odds ratio (OR) = 0.946; 95% confidence interval (CI):0.733–1.220; P = 0.669]. Additionally, tamsulosin use was not significantly associated with surgical complications of cataract surgery in the fully adjusted model accounting for age, income, residence, and systemic and ocular comorbidities (OR = 0.997; 95% CI: 0.749–1.325; P = 0.981).

Conclusions

The rate or risk of surgical complications of cataract surgery does not change with tamsulosin use. We suggest that better surgical techniques and surgeons' cognizance of the patient's tamsulosin use could improve surgical outcomes, without increasing surgical complications.

Comparison of different pupil dilatation methods for phacoemulsification in eyes with a small pupil

PURPOSE

To compare 6 methods for intraoperative pupil dilatation in eyes with insufficient pupil size during phacoemulsification.

METHODS

This was a prospective case-control study. 99 microcoria cataract patients (120 eyes) were collected and were divided into 6 groups(20 eyes each group), and their pupils were dilated by bimanual stretching pupil (group I), pupil radial cut open(group II), mechanical pupil dilatation with iris-retractor hooks (group III), OASIS iris expander (group IV), and Malyguin-ring (Microsurgical company, America) (group V), B-HEX Pupil Expander (Med Invent Devics, India)(group VI),respectively. 3.0 mm clear corneal incision were used in phacoemulsification. All cases were followed up at 1 week and 1, 3, 6 months after the surgery. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP), corneal endothelium cell density(ECD), pupil diameter(PD) of before and after surgery were compared.

RESULTS

One same doctor finished all cataract surgeries successfully. The eyes' condition before surgery and at 6 months after surgery were compared. There were no significant statistical differences for the conditions of the eyes before surgery among six groups. The ECDs were better at 6 months postoperatively in group III and V, median values: 2114/mm², 1961/mm². PD was largest in group II (median value: 5.5 mm), which was significantly larger than other groups (P_adjusted < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

All 6 methods used in this study were effective for the mechanical dilatation of small pupils and didn't affect the postoperative visual acuity and intraocular pressure in microcoria cataract phacoemulsification. Iris-retractor hooks and the Malyugin Ring can reduce intraoperative corneal endothelium cell loss. Postoperative PD is larger when the iris was cut open radially.

Application of an iris speculum for removing Soemmerring's ring during secondary intraocular lens implantation in congenital cataract patients with small pupils

An application of the XpandNT iris speculum in eyes with small pupils during secondary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in congenital cataract patients is described. The iris speculum was first positioned in the eye to expand the pupil. A 30-gauge needle was used to separate the adhesion of the iris tissue and the capsular rim. Vitrectomy was used to clean Soemmerring's ring near the capsular rim. The iris expander was retracted with the Williamson XpandNT Manipulator. The IOL was then implanted. Fourteen aphakic eyes from 10 consecutive patients were studied retrospectively; pupil expansion was achieved in all 14 eyes intraoperatively without serious intraoperative or postoperative complications. The iris speculum was a safe and excellent tool for removing Soemmerring's ring and solving small pupil problems during secondary IOL implantation in pediatric cataract surgery patients.

Management and outcomes of the small pupil in cataract surgery: iris hooks, Malyugin ring or phenylephrine?

PURPOSE

To investigate outcomes for small versus large pupils in cataract surgery using different pupil expansion techniques.

METHODS

Retrospective case-series reviewing 20,175 patients' cataract surgery electronic medical records at Moorfields Eye Clinic in Bedford Hospital NHS Trust from January 2010 to April 2020. Outcomes such as visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure, intraoperative, post-operative complications were recorded and small pupil expansion device outcome.

RESULTS

One thousand, four hundred twenty-six patients were identified as having small pupil (SP). Of these, 1110 patients (77.8%) had interventions to expand the pupil including 447 (31.3%) with intracameral phenylephrine (IC PE) alone, 194 (13.6%) with iris hooks and 469 (32.9%) with a Malyugin ring. The large pupil (LP) group had a statistically significant greater gain in VA than the SP group (p < 0.05). SPs had a significantly higher rate of intraocular complications including posterior capsular rupture (PCR) with vitreous loss (OR 2.75, p < 0.001). There was also a significantly higher rate of post-operative complications such as corneal oedema (OR 2.64, p < 0.001) and anterior uveitis (OR 2.11, p < 0.001) in the SP group. However, VA improvement and complications between the different pupil expansion groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) except for a greater rate of iris tears in the Malyugin group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

To date, this is the largest reported case-series comparing Malyugin rings and iris hooks with other pupil expansion techniques. The various techniques to expand pupil size appear to be safe and equally effective in improving VA with a similar rate of complications except for a greater rate of iris tears with Malyugin ring.

Iris manipulation during phacoemulsification: intraoperative and postoperative complications

AIM

To quantify intraoperative and postoperative complications in complex phacoemulsification cataract extraction (phacoemulsification) with iris manipulation compared to non-complex and complex phacoemulsification without iris manipulation.

METHODS

All phacoemulsification cases at the University of Colorado between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2017 were included. Exclusion criteria for the primary outcome of intraoperative complications were planned combination surgery and eyes with less than 28d follow-up. Exclusion criteria for the secondary outcomes of postoperative complications were unplanned additional surgery, and chronic steroid eye drop use prior to surgery. Data including sex, race/ethnicity, surgery length, visual acuity, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and intraocular pressures (IOP) were collected and analyzed utilizing general linear and Logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

The medical records of 5772 eyes were reviewed (500 complex without iris manipulation, 367 with iris manipulation). The number of any intraoperative complication in the complex with iris manipulation and complex without iris manipulation groups was 15 (4.1%) and 26 (5.2%), respectively, compared to 41 (0.8%) in the non-complex group. Postoperative inflammation was found in 135 (2.8%) non-complex cases, 20 (4.1%) complex cases without iris manipulation, and 20 (5.6%) complex cases with iris manipulation. The adjusted odds ratio of postoperative inflammation in phacoemulsification with iris manipulation compared to non-complex was 2.3 (95%CI: 1.3-4.0, P=0.005). The rate of IOP spikes >10 mm Hg was significantly greater in cases with iris manipulation (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Complex cases have more intraoperative complications. However, only complex cases with iris manipulation led to increase rates of postoperative inflammation and IOP spikes >10 mm Hg.

B-HEX pupil expander in vitreoretinal surgery - A case series

We describe the successful use of the B-HEX pupil expansion device in four cases of combined phacovitrectomy with significant cataract, non-dilating pupil, and surgical vitreoretinal pathologies including vitreous hemorrhage, inferior retinal detachment (RD) with proliferative vitreoretinopathy in an oil filled eye, recurrent rhegmatogenous RD, and macular hole with RD localized to the posterior pole in an eye with uveitic sequelae. The B-HEX remained well engaged and maintained excellent mydriasis throughout the surgery despite wide fluctuations in intraocular pressure and anterior chamber fluidics. This is the first series describing use of B-HEX for combined phacovitrectomy due to myriad causes.

Methods for achieving adequate pupil size in cataract surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure performed worldwide. Small pupils have been an eternal challenge for cataract surgeons; insufficient pupil dilation is associated with increased complication rates, including capsule rupture, vitreous loss, iris trauma or postoperative inflammation. The aim of the current review is to present the methods for pupil dilation and the risk factors for a small pupil in a cataract patient.

RECENT FINDINGS

Risk factors for intraoperative small pupil include diabetes, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, receiving glaucoma medications, having undergone previous ocular surgery and iris sphincter sclerosis from aging. There is a wide range of options to manage the small pupil, including pharmacological treatment, mechanical stretching, dilation with iris hooks or pupil expanders. We recommend a stepwise approach for intraoperative pupil dilation, from pharmacological mydriasis to pupil expanders.

SUMMARY

The current article discusses risk factors for a small pupil and the methods for pupil dilation in a cataract patient. Every cataract surgeon needs to be ready to cope with a small pupil, both manifesting preoperatively and intraoperatively.

Series of cataract surgeries with I-ring pupil expansion ring

BACKGROUND

The retrospective review of I-ring pupil expansion ring use is designed to examine the patient characteristics and associated surgical challenges in a clinical practice. The hypothesis is that I-ring provides a necessary additive tool in dealing with challenging cataract surgeries with small pupils.

AIM

To document the safety profile and use of I-ring pupil expansion ring in a clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 12 consecutive cases within the same year (2016) of cataract surgeries employing I-ring pupil expansion ring (Beaver-Visitec, International) by a single surgeon at the same ambulatory surgical center was conducted. Demographic, pre-op, intra-op, and post-op data were recorded. Total number of cataract cases performed was also recorded.

RESULTS

8 of 12 cases were planned I-ring cases. 1 case was decided intraoperatively when femtosecond laser caused the pupil to shrink. The other 3 cases were also decided upon intraoperatively when pupil was deemed to be small. 7 patients had IFIS from Flomax use. 2 patients had pseudoexfoliation syndrome as the cause of small pupil. 2 patients had narrow angles with brunescent cataracts. 2 patients had pre-op partial zonular dehiscence. 1 patient had 360^o of posterior synechiae. 2 cases had ruptured posterior capsule that required anterior vitrectomy. No complications were attributed to the pupil expansion ring. A total of 296 cataract surgeries were performed that year by the surgeon, making the rate of pupil ring use 4.1%.

CONCLUSION

Small pupil requiring pupil expansion ring during cataract surgery is often associated with other challenges, such as brunescent cataract, zonular weakness, and posterior synechiae in this series. I-ring helped to reduce at least one challenge in these difficult cases.