Assessing the risk of CMV reactivation and reconstitution of antiviral immune response post bone marrow transplantation by the QuantiFERON-CMV-assay and real time PCR

Cytomegalovirus antigen-specific multi-cytokine immune responses in patients with rheumatic diseases under different cytomegalovirus infection status: A case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To explore Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigen-specific multi-cytokine immune responses in patients with rheumatic disease (RD) under different CMV infection status.

METHODS

A total of 60 RD patients in our center from March 2023 to August 2023 were enrolled. The patients were divided into latent CMV infection and active CMV infection, the latter was classified as subclinical CMV infection or CMV disease based on presence or absence of symptoms related to CMV. Whole blood was collected and stimulated with QuantiFERON-CMV antigen. The levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17 and CXCL-2 in supernatant were measured by Luminex Assays. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of cytokine for distinguishing different CMV infection status.

RESULTS

The proportion of patients with severe lymphopenia was lowest in the latent CMV infection group, while there were no significant differences in medication usage in different CMV infection status. After stimulation with QF-CMV antigens, the levels of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2 in the CMV disease group were significantly lower than those in the latent CMV infection group. CMV antigen-specific IFN-γ, TNF-α levels and severe lymphopenia together provided the best discriminatory performance for distinguishing between latent and either active CMV infection patients (AUC = 0.854) or CMV disease patients (AUC = 0.935).

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive peripheral blood biomarkers (the combination of CMV antigen-specific IFN-γ, TNF-α levels and severe lymphopenia) may have the potential to diferentiate different status of CMV infection in RD population.

QuantiFERON monitor predicts early cytomegalovirus infection and viral burden in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of transplantation-related morbidity and mortality. This study assessed the utility of the QuantiFERON monitor (QFM; Qiagen) for the prediction of early CMV infection and viral burden.

METHODS

QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV; Qiagen) and QFM were measured at the post-allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) week 4. CMV DNA was measured at every visit until post-HSCT week 24. The QFM cutoff specific to CMV infection was established.

RESULT

At the post-HSCT week 4, the QFM cutoff predicting CMV infection was 86.95 IU/mL. While QF-CMV results at the post-HSCT week 4 were associated with high-level CMV infection (CMV DNA ≥ 5,000 IU/mL) but not with CMV infection (CMV DNA ≥ 500 IU/mL), QFM was associated with both CMV infection and high-level CMV infection. Both indeterminate QF-CMV and nonreactive QFM were associated with increased peak CMV DNA.

CONCLUSION

Low QFM is a risk factor for CMV infection and increased CMV viral loads. QFM at post-HSCT week 4 can be utilized as an assay to predict the risk and burden of early CMV infection in HSCT recipients, in conjunction with other risk factors.

Dynamics of cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell recovery in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients using a commercially available flow cytometry assay: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus-specific T-cell-mediated immunity (CMV-CMI) protects from CMV infection in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but to date, there is no validated measure of CMV immunity for this population.

METHODS

In this prospective, observational, pilot study, CMV T-cell responses were evaluated monthly and at onset of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or CMV infection in CMV-seropositive allo-HCT recipients using a commercial flow cytometry assay, the CMV inSIGHT T-Cell Immunity Panel (CMV-TCIP). The primary endpoint was the time to first positive CMV-TCIP, defined as percentage of interferon-γ-producing CD4+ or CD8+ CMV-specific T cells >0.2%. Letermovir was prescribed from day +10 to ≥100.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight allo-HCT recipients were enrolled. The median time to first positive CMV-TCIP result was earlier for CD4+ (60 days [interquartile range, IQR 33‒148]) than for CD8+ T cells (96 days [IQR 33‒155]) and longer for haploidentical and mismatched transplant recipients (77 and 96 days, respectively) than for matched donors (45 and 33 days, respectively). CD4+ and CD8+ CMV-CMI recovery was sustained in 10/10 (100%) and 10/11 (91%) patients, respectively, without GVHD, whereas CD4+ and/or CD8+ CMV-CMI was lost in 4/6 and 2/6 patients, respectively, with GVHD requiring steroids. As a predictor of clinically significant CMV infection in patients with low-level CMV reactivation, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMV-TCIP were 90% and 87.5%, respectively, for CD4+ CMV-TCIP and 66.7% and 62.5%, respectively, for CD8+ CMV-TCIP.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant variability in time to CMV-CMI recovery post-HCT, with slower recovery after haploidentical and mismatched HCT. CD4+ CMV-CMI may protect against CS-CMVi, but immunity may be lost with GVHD diagnosis and treatment.

Secretion of IFN-γ by specific T cells in HCMV infection

One major risk for recipients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants (allo-HSCTs) is infection with the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). For HCMV treatment, it is especially crucial to be able to differentiate between recipients who are at high risk of reactivation and those who are not. In this study, HCMV-DNA was collected from 60 HLA-A*02 allo-HSCT recipients before and after transplantation. After transplantation, the release of interferon (IFN)-γ by T cells specific to HCMV was assessed using the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISPOT). The results show that the median viral load (VL) was significantly higher in the HCMV persistent-infection group compared to the non-persistent-infection group (p = 0.002), and that the late-infection rate was considerably higher in the high-VL group compared to the low-VL group (p = 0.014). The uninfected group had a considerably higher median IFN-γ spot-forming cell (SFC) count than the persistent-infection group (p = 0.001), and IFN-γ SFC counts correlated negatively and linearly with VLs (r = -0.397, p = 0.002). The immune-response groups showed significantly difference in median VL (p = 0.018), and the high immune response group had a reduced late-infection rate than the no/low immune response groups (p = 0.049). Our study showed that allo-HSCT recipients with a high VL at an early transplantation stage were at high risk for late HCMV infection. Further HCMV reactivation can be prevented by HCMV-specific T cells secreting enough IFN-γ.

Cytomegalovirus Cell-mediated Immunity Assays in Pediatric Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in pediatric transplantation. However, currently utilized CMV prevention paradigms have limitations, leading to research aimed at novel strategies for mitigation of CMV infection. Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is crucial in controlling CMV infection and the use of CMV-specific CMI assays to guide prevention and treatment of CMV infection in both solid organ transplant and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients shows great promise. In this article, we review the immune response to CMV infection to highlight the rationale for CMI assays, describe available commercial assays and strategies for their use, and summarize relevant literature regarding the use of CMI assays in transplant recipients.

Circulating cytokine and chemokine patterns associated with cytomegalovirus reactivation after stem cell transplantation

Objectives

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) reactivation is the leading viral complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Understanding of circulating cytokine/chemokine patterns which accompany HCMV reactivation and correlate with HCMV DNAemia magnitude is limited. We aimed to characterise plasma cytokine/chemokine profiles in 36 allo-HSCT patients (21 with HCMV reactivation and 15 without HCMV reactivation) at four time-points in the first 100-day post-transplant.

Methods

The concentrations of 31 cytokines/chemokines in plasma samples were analysed using a multiplex bead-based immunoassay. Cytokine/chemokine concentrations were compared in patients with high-level HCMV DNAemia, low-level HCMV DNAemia or no HCMV reactivation, and correlated with immune cell frequencies measured using mass cytometry.

Results

Increased plasma levels of T helper 1-type cytokines/chemokines (TNF, IL-18, IP-10, MIG) were detected in patients with HCMV reactivation at the peak of HCMV DNAemia, relative to non-reactivators. Stem cell factor (SCF) levels were significantly higher before the detection of HCMV reactivation in patients who went on to develop high-level HCMV DNAemia (810-52 740 copies/mL) vs. low-level HCMV DNAemia (< 250 copies/mL). High-level HCMV reactivators, but not low-level reactivators, developed an elevated inflammatory cytokine/chemokine profile (MIP-1α, MIP-1β, TNF, LT-α, IL-13, IL-9, SCF, HGF) at the peak of reactivation. Plasma cytokine concentrations displayed unique correlations with circulating immune cell frequencies in patients with HCMV reactivation.

Conclusion

This study identifies distinct circulating cytokine/chemokine signatures associated with the magnitude of HCMV DNAemia and the progression of HCMV reactivation after allo-HSCT, providing important insight into immune recovery patterns associated with HCMV reactivation and viral control.

Torque teno virus viremia and QuantiFERON®-CMV assay in prediction of cytomegalovirus reactivation in R+ kidney transplant recipients

Introduction

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent infectious complication following solid organ transplantation. Torque teno viruses (TTV) viremia has been proposed as a biomarker of functional immunity in the management of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The QuantiFERON^®-CMV (QF-CMV) is a commercially available assay that allows the assessment of CD8⁺ T-cell responses in routine diagnostic laboratories.

Methods

In a prospective national multicenter cohort of 64 CMV-seropositive (R+) KTR, we analyzed the value of TTV load and the two markers of the QF-CMV assay [QF-Ag (CMV-specific T-cell responses) and QF-Mg (overall T-cell responses)], alone and in combination, in prediction of CMV reactivation (≥3 log₁₀ IU/ ml) in the first post-transplant year. We compared previously published cut-offs and specific cut-offs optimized from ROC curves for our population.

Results

Using the conventional cut-off (3.45 log₁₀ copies/ml), TTV load at D0 [inclusion visit on the day of transplantation before induction (D0)], or at M1 (1-month post-transplant visit) perform better in predicting CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation. Survival analyses suggest a better performance of our optimized TTV cut-offs (3.78 log₁₀ copies/ml at D0 and 4.23 log₁₀ copies/ml at M1) for risk stratification of CMV reactivation in our R+ KTR cohort. The QF-CMV (QF-Ag = 0.2 IU/ml, and QF-Mg = 0.5 IU/ml) also appears to better predict CMV viremia control than CMV reactivation. Moreover, survival analyses suggest that the QF-Mg would perform better than the QF-Ag in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation. The use of our optimized QF-Mg cut-off (1.27 IU/ml) at M1 further improved risk stratification of CMV reactivation. Using conventional cut-offs, the combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg did not improve prediction of CMV viremia control compared to separate analysis of each marker but resulted in an increase of positive predictive values. The use of our cut-offs slightly improved risk prediction of CMV reactivation.

Conclusion

The combination of TTV load and QF-Ag or TTV load and QF-Mg could be useful in stratifying the risk of CMV reactivation in R+ KTR during the first post-transplant year and thereby have an impact on the duration of prophylaxis in these patients.

Clinical trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov registry, identifier NCT02064699.

Immunological monitoring after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, are they the same?

BACKGROUND

CMV-reactivation and -disease is still a major concern after allogeneic stem cell transplantation [allo-HSCT], despite prophylactic and pre-emptive strategies. In recent years, immunologic monitoring using CMV-IGRA has gained interest to better risk stratify immunocompromised patients or to guide prophylactic therapies. CMV-IGRA can quantify CMV cell-mediated immunity by measuring the interferon-gamma that is released by CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes in the presence of CMV-antigens. However, the two most widely used CMV-IGRAs, T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV, have not yet been compared in the setting of an allo-HSCT.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a method comparison between the T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV 28 and 100 days after allo-HSCT, and to assess predictive values of both tests for CMV-reactivation.

STUDY DESIGN

In a bicentric prospective trial, 27 patients were included. Samples were taken on day +28 and day +100 after allo-HSCT. Patients' clinical information was collected up to 270 days after the transplant. Method comparison was performed using Cohen's kappa.

RESULTS

On day +28 (n=26) after allo-HSCT T-SPOT.CMV gave three positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV only two. On day +100 (n=24) T-SPOT.CMV gave seven positive test results, and QuantiFERON-CMV nine. One discordant result was obtained at day +28 (n=26), while six results were discordant at day +100 (n=24). Method comparison showed a strong agreement on day +28 (κ = 0.780 [95% CI: 0.366-1.000]), but only a moderate agreement on day +100 (κ = 0.442 [95% CI: 0.070-0.814]) and on pooled data from both time points (κ = 0.578 [95% CI: 0.300-0.856]). Four clinically significant CMV infections, (CS-CMVi) were observed, all occurring after discontinuation of letermovir-prophylaxis. None of those four patients had a positive result with either test at day +100 (or day +28). Negative predictive values (NPV) and sensitivity are therefore very high at 100% (for both tests, for NPV and sensitivity, measured at day +100). At day+100, positive predictive values (PPV) and specificity were considerably lower (T-SPOT.CMV: PPV 23.5% and specificity 35% - QuantiFERON-CMV: PPV 26.7% and specificity 45%).

CONCLUSION

T-SPOT.CMV and QuantiFERON-CMV only have a moderate agreement (at day +100) after allo-HSCT. Although these IGRAs are very promising, as shown by their very high negative predictive values for protection against CS-CMVi, they are not interchangeable. Future research should stipulate which IGRA was used, and future guidelines should preferably be assay-specific. As the QuantiFERON-CMV to date still lacks a large validation study after allo-HSCT, the moderate agreement with the T-SPOT.CMV poses a significant hurdle in the routine implementation of this test.

Diagnosis and treatment for the early stage of cytomegalovirus infection during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a frequent complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and causes significant morbidity and mortality in transplantation recipients. In this review, we highlight the role of major risk factors that are associated with the incidence of CMV infection. Advances in immunosurveillance may predict CMV infection, allowing early interventions to prevent severe infection. Furthermore, numerous therapeutic strategies against CMV infection after HSCT are summarized. A comprehensive understanding of the current situation of CMV treatment may provide a hint for clinical practice and even promote the development of novel strategies for precision medicine.

QuantiFERON-Cytomegalovirus Assay for Prediction of Cytomegalovirus Viremia in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Study From High Cytomegalovirus Seroprevalence Country

Background

Early studies showed the utility of pretransplant QuantiFERON-Cytomegalovirus (QF-CMV) assays for CMV-disease prediction post kidney transplant (KT). However, recent data are conflicting.

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled adult patients undergoing KT between July 2017 and May 2019. Patients with antithymocyte globulin therapy or negative pretransplant CMV IgG were excluded. QF-CMV assays were performed on transplantation day and one month thereafter, and CMV viral loads were obtained 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation. The primary outcome was CMV viremia within 6 months. The QF-CMV assay–posttransplant CMV viremia association was analyzed.

Results

Fifty-five patients were enrolled (male, 58.2%; mean (SD) age, 46.5 (10.2) years). Fifty-two (94.5%) received CMV-seropositive donor kidneys. Over 6 months, 29 patients developed CMV viremia (52.7%), with 14 (25.5%) having significant viremia requiring antiviral therapy. The CMV-viremia incidence of patients with nonreactive and reactive baseline QF-CMV assays did not differ significantly (55.3% and 47.1%; p = 0.573). Among patients with reactive pretransplant QF-CMV assays, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of CMV viremia for those who were persistently reactive at 1 month after KTs, although there was no statistically significant difference (50% vs 83%; p = 0.132).

Conclusions

Our study could not support the use of single-timepoint pretransplant or 1-month posttransplant QF-CMV assays as a predictor for posttransplant CMV viremia in CMV seropositive KT recipients. Investigation of the association between dynamic QF-CMV-status changes and CMV-viremia incidence are needed.

QuantiFERON-CMV to predict clinically significant CMV infection after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Controlling CMV infection through prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy remains an important contributor to outcomes after allogeneic haematopoetic stem cell transplant (alloHCT). Predicting clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) after day 100 remains a challenge.

METHODS

We examined the abilty of the QuantiFERON-CMV^® assay (QFN-CMV) at day 100 (d100) and day 150 (d150) after alloHCT to predict csCMVi after these time points, with median follow-up of 3.1 years (range 1.3 to 4.3 years).

RESULTS

In 46 transplants (D+R- = 12, D+R+ = 25, D-R+ = 9; matched related = 13, unrelated donor = 32, haploidentical = 1), for the prediction of freedom from csCMVi>d100, QFN-CMVd100 (positive compared to negative/indeterminate) had sensitivity 62% (23/37), specificity 100% (9/9), positive predictive value 100% (23/23), and negative predictive value 39% (9/23). For the prediction of freedom from csCMVi>d150, QFN-CMVd150 (positive compared to negative/indeterminate) had sensitivity 62% (18/29), specificity 83% (5/6), positive predictive value 95% (18/19), and negative predictive value 31% (5/16).

CONCLUSION

Positive QFN-CMV at d100 and d150 strongly predicted freedom from csCMVi after these time points. QFN-CMV could be utilised to predict the need for pre-emptive therapy and CMV viral load monitoring after day 100 post alloHCT. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Patient risk stratification and tailored clinical management of post‐transplant CMV‐, EBV‐, and BKV‐infections by monitoring virus‐specific T‐cell immunity

Background

Despite routine post‐transplant viral monitoring and pre‐emptive therapy, viral infections remain a major cause of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation‐related morbidity and mortality.

Objective

We here aimed to prospectively assess the kinetics and the magnitude of cytomegalovirus‐(CMV), Epstein Barr virus‐(EBV), and BK virus‐(BKV)‐specific T cell responses post‐transplant and evaluate their role in guiding therapeutic decisions by patient risk‐stratification.

Study design

The tri‐virus‐specific immune recovery was assessed by Elispot, in 50 consecutively transplanted patients, on days +20, +30, +60, +100, +150, +200 post‐transplant and in case of reactivation, weekly for 1 month.

Results

The great majority of the patients experienced at least one reactivation, while over 40% of them developed multiple reactivations from more than one of the tested viruses, especially those transplanted from matched or mismatched unrelated donors. The early reconstitution of virus‐specific immunity (day +20), favorably correlated with transplant outcomes. Εxpanding levels of CMV‐, EBV‐, and BKV‐specific T cells (VSTs) post‐reactivation coincided with decreasing viral load and control of infection. Certain cut‐offs of absolute VST numbers or net VST cell expansion post‐reactivation were determined, above which, patients with CMV or BKV reactivation had >90% probability of complete response (CR).

Conclusion

Immune monitoring of virus‐specific T‐cell reconstitution post‐transplant may allow risk‐stratification of virus reactivating patients and enable patient‐tailored treatment. The identification of individuals with high probability of CR will minimize unnecessary overtreatment and drug‐associated toxicity while allowing candidates for pre‐emptive intervention with adoptive transfer of VSTs to be appropriately selected.

CMV Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Prevention and Treatment Strategies

Purpose of Review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT). New strategies and methods for prevention and management of CMV infection are urgently needed. We aim to review the new developments in diagnostics, prevention, and management strategies of CMV infection in Allo-HSCT recipients.

Recent Findings

The approval of the novel anti-CMV drug letermovir in 2017 has led to an increase in the use of antiviral prophylaxis as a preferred approach for prevention in many centers. Real-world studies have shown efficacy similar to the clinical trial. CMV-specific T cell-mediated immunity assays identify patients with immune reconstitution and predict disease progression. Phase 2 trials of maribavir have shown its efficacy as preemptive therapy and treatment of resistant and refractory CMV infections. Adoptive T cell therapy is an emerging option for treatment of refractory and resistant CMV. Of the different CMV vaccine trials, PepVax has shown promising results in a phase 1 trial.

Summary

CMV cell-mediated immunity assays have potential to be used as an adjunctive test to develop individualized management plan by identifying the patients who develop immune reconstitution; however, further prospective interventional studies are needed. Maribavir and adoptive T cell therapy are promising new therapies for treatment of CMV infections. CMV vaccine trials for prevention are also under way.

ELISPOT assay of interferon-γ secretion for evaluating human cytomegalovirus reactivation risk in allo-HSCT recipients

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) is a common cause of significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). We evaluated interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion by HCMV NLV-specific CD8⁺ T cells in HCMV-reactivated allo-HSCT recipients using an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay at 3 months post-transplantation. Blood samples from 47 recipients were tested for HCMV DNAemia, HCMV pp65 antigenemia, and anti-HCMV immunoglobulins (IgG/IgM) over 3 months post-transplantation. Of the 47 transplant recipients, 26 were HLA-A*02 positive and 21 were HLA-A*02 negative. The results were essentially consistent between the 47 transplant recipients and the HLA-A*02-positive recipients. HCMV DNAemia was not linearly correlated with IFN-γ spot-forming cells (SFCs) counts; IFN-γ SFCs counts did not differ significantly between the HCMV DNAemia-positive and -negative groups, whereas the HCMV-DNA virus loads were inversely correlated with the IFN-γ SFCs counts. HCMV pp65 antigenemia was not linearly correlated with IFN-γ SFCs counts; IFN-γ SFCs counts in the HCMV pp65 antigenemia-positive and -negative groups were similar. More IFN-γ SFCs counts were detected in transplant recipients with high anti-HCMV-IgG antibody titers than in those with low anti-HCMV-IgG titers pre-transplantation in the 47 recipients. Anti-HCMV-IgG antibody titers were positively linearly correlated with IFN-γ SFCs counts in HLA-A*02-positive recipients. The HCMV infection indicators used to monitor HCMV reactivation had different values in transplant recipients. The use of the IFN-γ SFCs counts measured by ELISPOT to evaluate the risk of HCMV reactivation needs further study.

Letermovir Administration to Prevent Cytomegalovirus Reactivation Is the Potential Risk of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Patients Who Received Haploidentical Stem-Cell Transplantation With Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide

The prevention of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is important for recipients of hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). As one of the etiologies, the relationship between early T-cell recovery and subsequent cGVHD development has been the focus of attention. Recently, letermovir (LTV) was approved for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation in the early transplantation phase. Although CMV affects the immune reconstitution after HSCT, the impacts of LTV to prevent CMV reactivation on early T-cell recovery and cGVHD have not been fully investigated. We aimed to identify early T-cell recovery under LTV at day 30 in 15 and 33 recipients from matched related donors (MRDs) and haploidentical donors with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy-haplo), respectively. Early increases in the levels of total lymphocytes and HLA-DR⁺ activated T-cells at day 30 were observed under CMV prophylaxis by LTV only in PTCy-haplo recipients and not in MRD recipients. Moreover, PTCy-haplo recipients with LTV showed a significantly higher incidence of cGVHD, but not acute GVHD. Our observations suggest that an early increase in the levels of HLA-DR⁺ activated T-cells may be implicated in the development of cGVHD in patients treated with PTCy who received LTV. Further studies are warranted to validate our results and elucidate the detailed mechanisms of our new insights.

Functional immune reconstitution early after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation: A comparison of pre- and post-transplantation cytokine responses in stimulated whole blood

We aimed to use a novel standardized whole-blood stimulation system to evaluate differences in the functional immune reconstitution in patients early after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Between April and September 2018, 30 patients undergoing HCT had whole blood samples collected around day -21 (day 0 being the day of haematopoietic cell infusion) and day +28. Whole blood was transferred to TruCulture assays comprising prefilled incubation tubes with cell culture medium and a standardized stimulus. We used a panel of four stimuli (lipopolysaccharide, resiquimod, heat-killed Candida albicans and polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid) and a blank, designed to evaluate the function of critical extra- and intracellular immunological signalling pathways. For each stimulus, the cytokine response was assessed by the concentration of interferon-γ, interleukin (IL)-12p40, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-17A and tumour necrosis factor-α using a multiplex Luminex assay. Pre-HCT cytokine responses were globally decreased across several different stimuli. Despite patients receiving immunosuppressive prophylaxis at the time, post-HCT cytokine responses were higher and less intercorrelated than pre-HCT responses, also after adjusting for differences in the leukocyte differential counts. For the resiquimod and heat-killed Candida albicans stimuli, we identified a cluster of patients in whom post-HCT responses were lower than average across several cytokines, indicating a possible functional immune deficiency. Our findings suggest that the standardized whole blood stimulation system can be used to reveal heterogeneity in the in vitro cytokine responses to various stimuli after HCT. Larger studies are needed to address if the functional immune reconstitution after HCT can predict the risk of infections.

Human cytomegalovirus infection: A considerable issue following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is an opportunistic virus, whereby recipients are most susceptible following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). With the development of novel immunosuppressive agents and antiviral drugs, accompanied with the widespread application of prophylaxis and preemptive treatment, significant developments have been made in transplant recipients with human (H)CMV infection. However, HCMV remains an important cause of short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. The present review summarizes the molecular mechanism and risk factors of HCMV reactivation following allo-HSCT, the diagnosis of CMV infection following allo-HSCT, prophylaxis and treatment of HCMV infection, and future perspectives. All relevant literature were retrieved from PubMed and have been reviewed.

Viral Infections in HSCT: Detection, Monitoring, Clinical Management, and Immunologic Implications

In spite of an increasing array of investigations, the relationships between viral infections and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are still controversial, and almost exclusively regard DNA viruses. Viral infections per se account for a considerable risk of morbidity and mortality among HSCT recipients, and available antiviral agents have proven to be of limited effectiveness. Therefore, an optimal management of viral infection represents a key point in HSCT strategies. On the other hand, viruses bear the potential of shaping immunologic recovery after HSCT, possibly interfering with control of the underlying disease and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and eventually with HSCT outcome. Moreover, preliminary data are available about the possible role of some virome components as markers of immunologic recovery after HSCT. Lastly, HSCT may exert an immunotherapeutic effect against some viral infections, notably HIV and HTLV-1, and has been considered as an eradicating approach in these indications.

Recent Approaches and Strategies in the Generation of Anti-human Cytomegalovirus Vaccines

Human cytomegalovirus is the largest human herpesvirus and shares many core features of other herpesviruses such as tightly regulated gene expression during genome replication and latency as well as the establishment of lifelong persistence following infection. In contrast to stereotypic clinical syndromes associated with alpha-herpesvirus infections, almost all primary HCMV infections are asymptomatic and acquired early in life in most populations in the world. Although asymptomatic in most individuals, HCMV is a major cause of disease in hosts with deficits in adaptive and innate immunity such as infants who are infected in utero and allograft recipients following transplantation. Congenital HCMV is a commonly acquired infection in the developing fetus that can result in a number of neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Similarly, HCMV is a major cause of disease in allograft recipients in the immediate and late posttransplant period and is thought to be a major contributor to chronic allograft rejection. Even though HCMV induces robust innate and adaptive immune responses, it also encodes a vast array of immune evasion functions that are thought aid in its persistence. Immune correlates of protective immunity that prevent or modify intrauterine HCMV infection remain incompletely defined but are thought to consist primarily of adaptive responses in the pregnant mother, thus making congenital HCMV a potentially vaccine modifiable disease. Similarly, HCMV infection in allograft recipients is often more severe in recipients without preexisting adaptive immunity to HCMV. Thus, there has been a considerable effort to modify HCMV specific immunity in transplant recipient either through active immunization or passive transfer of adaptive effector functions. Although efforts to develop an efficacious vaccine and/or passive immunotherapy to limit HCMV disease have been underway for nearly six decades, most have met with limited success at best. In contrast to previous efforts, current HCMV vaccine development has relied on observations of unique properties of HCMV in hopes of reproducing immune responses that at a minimum will be similar to that following natural infection. However, more recent findings have suggested that immunity following naturally acquired HCMV infection may have limited protective activity and almost certainly, is not sterilizing. Such observations suggest that either the induction of natural immunity must be specifically tailored to generate protective activity or alternatively, that providing targeted passive immunity to susceptible populations could be prove to be more efficacious.

How I treat CMV reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation remains one of the most common and life-threatening infectious complications following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, despite novel diagnostic technologies, several novel prophylactic agents, and further improvements in preemptive therapy and treatment of established CMV disease. Treatment decisions for CMV reactivation are becoming increasingly difficult and must take into account whether the patient has received antiviral prophylaxis, the patient's individual risk profile for CMV disease, CMV-specific T-cell reconstitution, CMV viral load, and the potential drug resistance detected at the time of initiation of antiviral therapy. Thus, we increasingly use personalized treatment strategies for the recipient of an allograft with CMV reactivation based on prior use of anti-CMV prophylaxis, viral load, the assessment of CMV-specific T-cell immunity, and the molecular assessment of resistance to antiviral drugs.

Progress and Challenges in the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management of Cytomegalovirus Infection in Transplantation

Hosts with compromised or naive immune systems, such as individuals living with HIV/AIDS, transplant recipients, and fetuses, are at the highest risk for complications from cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Despite substantial progress in prevention, diagnostics, and treatment, CMV continues to negatively impact both solid-organ transplant (SOT) and hematologic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. In this article, we summarize important developments in the field over the past 10 years and highlight new approaches and remaining challenges to the optimal control of CMV infection and disease in transplant settings.

Assessment and prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant and in solid organ transplant: A multidisciplinary consensus conference by the Italian GITMO, SITO, and AMCLI societies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and solid organ transplantation (SOT) recipients. In view of the uncertainties on the assessment and prevention of CMV infection in both transplant procedures, three Italian scientific societies for HSCT and SOT and for Clinical Microbiology appointed a panel of experts to compose a framework of recommendations. Recommendations were derived from a comprehensive analysis of the scientific literature and from a multidisciplinary consensus conference process. The lack of adequate clinical trials focused on certain diagnostic procedures, and antiviral intervention forced the panel to use the methods of consensus for shaping some recommendations. Recommendations concerning the two types of transplant were given for the following issues: assessment of pretransplant CMV serostatus, immunological monitoring after transplant, CMV prophylaxis with antivirals, CMV preemptive strategy, and CMV prophylaxis with immunoglobulin infusion and with adoptive immunotherapy. The questions raised by and the recommendations resulting from this consensus conference project may contribute to the improvement of certain crucial aspects of the management of CMV infections in allo-HSCT and in SOT populations.

New therapies for human cytomegalovirus infections

The recent approval of letermovir marks a new era of therapy for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infections, particularly for the prevention of HCMV disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. For almost 30 years ganciclovir has been the therapy of choice for these infections and by today's standards this drug exhibits only modest antiviral activity that is often insufficient to completely suppress viral replication, and drives the selection of drug-resistant variants that continue to replicate and contribute to disease. While ganciclovir remains the therapy of choice, additional drugs that inhibit novel molecular targets, such as letermovir, will be required as highly effective combination therapies are developed not only for the treatment of immunocompromised hosts, but also for congenitally infected infants. Sustained efforts, largely in the biotech industry and academia, have identified additional highly active lead compounds that have progressed into clinical studies with varying levels of success and at least two have the potential to be approved in the near future. Some of the new drugs in the pipeline inhibit new molecular targets, remain effective against isolates that have developed resistance to existing therapies, and promise to augment existing therapeutic regimens. Here, we will describe some of the unique features of HCMV biology and discuss their effect on therapeutic needs. Existing drugs will also be discussed and some of the more promising candidates will be reviewed with an emphasis on those progressing through clinical studies. The in vitro and in vivo antiviral activity, spectrum of antiviral activity, and mechanism of action of new compounds will be reviewed to provide an update on potential new therapies for HCMV infections that have progressed significantly in recent years.

HHV-6B infection, T-cell reconstitution, and graft-vs-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Successful and sustained CD4⁺ T-cell reconstitution is associated with increased survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but opportunistic infections may adversely affect the time and extent of immune reconstitution. Human herpesvirus 6B (HHV-6B) efficiently infects CD4⁺ T cells and utilizes as a receptor CD134 (OX40), a member of the TNF superfamily that antagonizes regulatory T-cell (T_reg) activity. Reactivation of HHV-6B has been associated with aberrant immune reconstitution and acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after HCT. Given that T_reg counts are negatively correlated with aGVHD severity, we postulate that one mechanism for the poor CD4⁺ T-cell reconstitution observed shortly after transplant may be HHV-6B infection and depletion of peripheral (extra-thymic) CD4⁺ T cells, including a subpopulation of T_reg cells. In turn, this may trigger a series of adverse events resulting in poor clinical outcomes such as severe aGVHD. In addition, recent evidence has linked HHV-6B reactivation with aberrant CD4⁺ T-cell reconstitution late after transplantation, which may be mediated by a different mechanism, possibly related to central (thymic) suppression of T-cell reconstitution. These observations suggest that aggressive management of HHV-6B reactivation in transplant patients may facilitate CD4⁺ T-cell reconstitution and improve the quality of life and survival of HCT patients.