Activity of imipenem/relebactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with antimicrobial-resistant phenotypes from seven global regions: SMART 2015-2016

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in Greece and Italy-SMART 2017-2021

PURPOSE

The current study evaluated the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (IMI/REL), and comparators against recent (2017-2021) clinical isolates of gram-negative bacilli from two countries in southern Europe.

METHODS

Nine clinical laboratories (two in Greece; seven in Italy) each collected up to 250 consecutive gram-negative isolates per year from lower respiratory tract, intraabdominal, urinary tract, and bloodstream infection samples. MICs were determined by the CLSI broth microdilution method and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-nonsusceptible isolate subsets.

RESULTS

C/T inhibited the growth of 85-87% of Enterobacterales and 94-96% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME (non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales) isolates from both countries. IMI/REL inhibited 95-98% of NME, 100% of ESBL-positive non-CRE NME, and 98-99% of KPC-positive NME isolates from both countries. Country-specific differences in percent susceptible values for C/T, IMI/REL, meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, levofloxacin, and amikacin were more pronounced for Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Enterobacterales. C/T and IMI/REL both inhibited 84% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece and 91-92% of isolates from Italy. MBL rates were estimated as 4% of Enterobacterales and 10% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Greece compared to 1% of Enterobacterales and 3% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy. KPC rates among Enterobacterales isolates were similar in both countries (7-8%). OXA-48-like enzymes were only identified in Enterobacterales isolates from Italy (1%) while GES carbapenemase genes were only identified in P. aeruginosa isolates from Italy (2%).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that C/T and IMI/REL may provide viable treatment options for many patients from Greece and Italy.

Antimicrobial Resistance Profiles of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the Arabian Gulf Region Over a 12-Year Period (2010-2021)

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate literature from a 12-year period (2010-2021) on the antimicrobial resistance profile of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the Arabian Gulf countries (Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates).

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted for articles on antimicrobial resistance in P. aeruginosa and associated phenotypes, covering the period of 1st January 2010 to 1st December 2021.

RESULTS

Antimicrobial resistance in the Arabian Gulf was highest to meropenem (10.3-45.7%) and lowest to colistin (0.0-0.8%), among the agents tested. Annual data showed that ceftazidime resistance (Kuwait), piperacillin-tazobactam non-susceptibility (Qatar), and aztreonam, imipenem, and meropenem resistance (Saudi Arabia) increased by 12-17%. Multiple mechanisms of carbapenem resistance were identified and multiple clones were detected, including high-risk clones such as ST235. The most common carbapenemases detected were the VIM-type metallo-β-lactamases.

CONCLUSIONS

Among P. aeruginosa in the Arabian Gulf countries, resistance to meropenem was higher than to the other agents tested, and meropenem resistance increased in Saudi Arabia during the study period. Resistance to colistin, a classic antibiotic used to treat Pseudomonas spp. infections, remained low. The VIM-type β-lactamase genes were dominant. We recommend local and regional antimicrobial resistance surveillance programs to detect the emergence of resistance genes and to monitor antimicrobial resistance trends in P. aeruginosa.

Susceptibility of Gram-negative isolates collected in South Korea to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents-SMART 2018-21

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro susceptibility of recent Gram-negative pathogens collected in South Korean medical centres to imipenem/relebactam and comparator agents.

Methods

From 2018 to 2021, six hospitals in South Korea each collected up to 250 consecutive, aerobic or facultative Gram-negative pathogens per year from patients with bloodstream, intra-abdominal, lower respiratory tract and urinary tract infections. MICs were determined using CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted by 2023 CLSI breakpoints. Most isolates that were imipenem/relebactam, imipenem or ceftolozane/tazobactam non-susceptible were screened for β-lactamase genes by PCR or WGS.

Results

Of all non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales (NME) isolates (n = 4100), 98.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Most NME were also susceptible to imipenem alone (94.7%) and meropenem (97.3%); percent susceptible values for non-carbapenem β-lactam comparators were lower (68%-80%). Imipenem/relebactam retained activity against 96.4%, 70.8% and 70.6% of MDR, difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) and meropenem-non-susceptible NME, respectively, and inhibited 93.1% of KPC-carrying and 95.5% of ESBL-carrying NME. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant NME, 21/25 (84.0%) carried an MBL or an OXA-48-like carbapenemase. Of all Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (n = 738), 82.8% were imipenem/relebactam susceptible; percent susceptible values for all β-lactam comparators, including carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem) were 61.5%-74.7%. Less than 20% of MDR and DTR isolates, and 41% of meropenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Of imipenem/relebactam-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates, 61.6% carried an MBL and 37.0% did not possess any acquired β-lactamase genes.

Conclusions

Based on in vitro data, imipenem/relebactam, if licensed in South Korea, may be a viable treatment option for many hospitalized patients infected with common Gram-negative pathogens including NME exhibiting MDR, DTR and carbapenem resistance and many β-lactam-resistant phenotypes of P. aeruginosa.

Management strategies for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the management of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen in intensive care; the main related infections are nosocomial pneumonias, then bloodstream infections. Antimicrobial resistance is common; despite new antibiotics, it is associated with increased mortality, and can lead to a therapeutic deadlock.

SUMMARY

Carbapenem resistance in difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA) strains is primarily mediated by loss or reduction of the OprD porin, overexpression of the cephalosporinase AmpC, and/or overexpression of efflux pumps. However, the role of carbapenemases, particularly metallo-β-lactamases, has become more important. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam are useful against DTR phenotypes (noncarbapenemase producers). Other new agents, such as aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam or cefiderocol, or colistin, might be effective for carbapenemase producers. Regarding nonantibiotic agents, only phages might be considered, pending further clinical trials. Combination therapy does not reduce mortality, but may be necessary for empirical treatment. Short-term treatment of severe P. aeruginosa infections should be preferred when it is expected that the clinical situation resolves rapidly.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

Temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators in Taiwan-SMART 2012-2021

OBJECTIVES

To determine the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates cultured from hospitalised patient samples in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 with an additional focus on the temporal and geographical prevalence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA).

METHODS

P. aeruginosa isolates (n = 3013) were collected annually by clinical laboratories in northern (two medical centres), central (three medical centres), and southern Taiwan (four medical centres) as part of the SMART global surveillance program. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 CLSI breakpoints. Molecular β-lactamase gene identification was performed on selected non-susceptible isolate subsets in 2015 and later.

RESULTS

Overall, 520 (17.3%) CRPA isolates were identified. The prevalence of CRPA increased from 11.5%-12.3% (2012-2015) to 19.4%-22.8% (2018-2021) (P ≤ 0.0001). Medical centres in northern Taiwan reported the highest percentages of CRPA. C/T, first tested in the SMART program in 2016, was highly active against all P. aeruginosa (97% susceptible), with annual susceptibility rates ranging from 94% (2017) to 99% (2020). Against CRPA, C/T inhibited >90% of isolates each year, with the exception of 2017 (79.4% susceptible). Most CRPA isolates (83%) were molecularly characterised, and only 2.1% (9/433) carried a carbapenemase (most commonly, VIM); all nine carbapenemase-positive isolates were from northern and central Taiwan.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of CRPA increased significantly in Taiwan from 2012 to 2021 and warrants continued monitoring. In 2021, 97% of all P. aeruginosa and 92% of CRPA in Taiwan were C/T susceptible. Routine in vitro susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa against C/T, and other newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, appears prudent.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected in central and northern Europe (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland)-SMART 2017-21

Objectives

To evaluate the in vitro activities of ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli collected in four central and northern European countries (Belgium, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland) during 2017-21.

Methods

Participating clinical laboratories each collected up to 250 consecutive Gram-negative isolates per year from patients with bloodstream, intraabdominal, lower respiratory tract or urinary tract infections. MICs were determined by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using 2022 EUCAST breakpoints. β-Lactamase genes were identified in select β-lactam-non-susceptible isolate subsets.

Results

Ninety-five percent of all Enterobacterales (n = 4158), 95% of ESBL-positive non-carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (non-CRE) phenotype Escherichia coli and 85% of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Klebsiella pneumoniae were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. By country, 88% (Belgium), 91% (Sweden, Switzerland) and 96% (Norway) of ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible. Greater than ninety-nine percent of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales and all ESBL-positive non-CRE phenotype Enterobacterales were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Ceftolozane/tazobactam (96%) and imipenem/relebactam (95%) inhibited most Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 823). Both agents retained activity against ≥75% of cefepime-resistant, ceftazidime-resistant and piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant isolates; 56% and 43% of meropenem-resistant isolates were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and imipenem/relebactam susceptible, respectively. By country, 94% (Belgium), 95% (Sweden) and 100% (Norway, Switzerland) of P. aeruginosa were ceftolozane/tazobactam susceptible and 93% (Sweden) to 98% (Norway, Switzerland) were imipenem/relebactam susceptible. Carbapenemase gene carriage among Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates was generally low (<1%) or completely absent with one exception: an estimated 2.7% of P. aeruginosa isolates from Belgium carried an MBL.

Conclusions

Recent clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa collected in four central and northern European countries were highly susceptible (≥95%) to ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam.

Comparison of In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Imipenem-Relebactam against Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

The role of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in ceftazidime-nonsusceptible (CAZ-NS) and imipenem-nonsusceptible (IPM-NS) Pseudomonas aeruginosa has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates, determined how avibactam restored ceftazidime activity, and compared the activity of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) against KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Similar high susceptibility rates for CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam (88.9% to 89.8%) were found for 596 P. aeruginosa clinical isolates from 11 hospitals in China, and a higher susceptibility rate to ceftazidime than imipenem was observed (73.5% versus 63.1%). For CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates, susceptibility rates for CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR were 61.5% (75/122), 54.9% (67/122), and 51.6% (63/122), respectively. For CAZ-NS, IPM-NS but CZA-susceptible isolates, 34.7% (26/75) harbored acquired β-lactamases with KPC-2 predominant (n = 19), and 45.3% (34/75) presented overexpression of chromosomal β-lactamase ampC. Among 22 isolates carrying KPC-2 carbapenemase alone, susceptibility rates to CZA and IMR were 86.4% (19/22) and 9.1% (2/22), respectively. Notably, 95% (19/20) of IMR-nonsusceptible isolates had an inactivating mutation of oprD gene. In conclusion, CZA, ceftolozane-tazobactam, and IMR exhibit high activity against P. aeruginosa, and CZA is more active than IMR against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS isolates as well as KPC-producing P. aeruginosa. Avibactam overcomes ceftazidime resistance engendered by KPC-2 enzyme and overexpressed AmpC. IMPORTANCE The emergence of antimicrobial resistance poses a particular challenge globally, and the concept of P. aeruginosa with "difficult-to-treat" resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was proposed. Here, P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were highly susceptible to three β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, CZA, IMR, and ceftolozane-tazobactam. The combination of KPC-2 enzyme and nonfunctional porin OprD contributed to IMR resistance in P. aeruginosa, and CZA was more active than IMR in fighting against KPC-2-producing P. aeruginosa. CZA also showed good activity against CAZ-NS and IPM-NS P. aeruginosa, primarily by inhibiting KPC-2 enzyme and overproduced AmpC, supporting the clinical use of CZA in the treatment of infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients in the Middle East and Africa - Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) 2017-2020

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), and comparators against clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected for the global Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART) surveillance program in ten countries in the Middle East and Africa to augment scarce standardized surveillance data in this region.

METHODS

Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution and interpreted with European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoints. P. aeruginosa isolates testing with C/T MIC >4 mg/l or imipenem MIC >2 mg/l were screened for β-lactamase genes.

RESULTS

C/T was active against 91.4% and 87.0% of P. aeruginosa isolates from the Middle East and Africa, respectively (14-21 and 7-16 percentage points higher than most β-lactam comparators, respectively). Considerable variation in susceptibility was seen across countries, which largely correlated with the observed prevalence of carbapenemases and/or extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Differences across countries were smaller for C/T than for the β-lactam comparators, ranging from 81% C/T-susceptible among isolates from Jordan to 95% for Qatar. Among subsets resistant to meropenem, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam, C/T maintained activity against 51-73% of isolates from the Middle East and against 27-54% from Africa (where metallo-β-lactamase and GES carbapenemase rates were higher).

CONCLUSION

Given the desirability of β-lactam use among clinicians, C/T represents an important option in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa.

New Drugs for the Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections with Limited Treatment Options: A Narrative Review

P. aeruginosa is still one of the most threatening pathogens responsible for serious hospital-acquired infections. It is intrinsically resistant to many antimicrobial agents and additional acquired resistance further complicates the management of such infections. High rates of combined antimicrobial resistance persist in many countries, especially in the eastern and south-eastern parts of Europe. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the epidemiology, latest data, and clinical evidence on the current and new available drugs active against P. aeruginosa isolates with limited treatment options. The latest evidence and recommendations supporting the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam and ceftazidime-avibactam, characterized by targeted clinical activity against a significant proportion of P. aeruginosa strains with limited treatment options, are described based on a review of the latest microbiological and clinical studies. Cefiderocol, with excellent in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa isolates, good stability to all β-lactamases and against porin and efflux pumps mutations, is also examined. New carbapenem combinations are explored, reviewing the latest experimental and initial clinical evidence. One section is devoted to a review of new anti-pseudomonal antibiotics in the pipeline, such as cefepime-taniborbactam and cefepime-zidebactam. Finally, other “old” antimicrobials, mainly fosfomycin, that can be used as combination strategies, are described.

Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative isolates among different infections in Hong Kong: SMART 2017-2019

Introduction. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was approved by the Drug Office, Department of Health, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in 2017.Hypothesis/Gap Statement. Currently the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative pathogens isolated from patients in Hong Kong is undocumented. It would be prudent to document the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales isolated from hospitalized patients in Hong Kong.Aim. To describe the in vitro susceptibility of recent clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa and the two most common Enterobacterales species (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli) cultured from respiratory tract, intra-abdominal, urinary tract and bloodstream infection samples to ceftolozane/tazobactam and other commonly used antimicrobial agents.Methodology. CLSI-defined broth microdilution MICs were determined and interpreted for Gram-negative isolates collected in Hong Kong from 2017 to 2019 by the SMART surveillance programme.Results. For P. aeruginosa, 96.7 % of isolates (n=210) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, while susceptibility rates were ≥14 % lower to meropenem (82.9 % susceptible), cefepime (82.4 %), ceftazidime (81.4 %), piperacillin/tazobactam (76.7 %) and levofloxacin (79.5 %). Ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 85.7 % of piperacillin/tazobactam-nonsusceptible isolates, 80.6-82.1 % of cefepime-, ceftazidime- or meropenem-nonsusceptible isolates, and 75.9 % of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of P. aeruginosa. For K. pneumoniae, 96.1 % of isolates (n=308) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem (99.0 % susceptible), piperacillin/tazobactam (93.8 %), cefepime (85.7 %) and ceftazidime (85.4 %). The majority (88.3 %) of ESBL (extended-spectrum β-lactamase) non-CRE (carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales) phenotype isolates of K. pneumoniae were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, comparable to piperacillin/tazobactam (85.0 %) but lower than meropenem (100 %). For E. coli, 98.5 % of isolates (n=609) were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam compared to meropenem (99.3 % susceptible), piperacillin/tazobactam (96.7 %), ceftazidime (82.3 %) and cefepime (76.5 %). The majority (96.7 %) of ESBL non-CRE phenotype isolates of E. coli were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, similar to both meropenem (100 %) and piperacillin/tazobactam (94.5 %).Conclusions. Overall, >96 % of clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and E. coli collected in Hong Kong in 2017-2019 were susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam, while the activity of several commonly prescribed β-lactams was reduced, especially for P. aeruginosa. Continued surveillance of ceftolozane/tazobactam and other agents is warranted.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Imipenem-Cilastatin/Relebactam Combination Therapy

On 16 July, 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration approved imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections. This decision was based on substantial clinical and pre-clinical data, including rigorous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic work, and is an important step forward in the management of these debilitating conditions. This article provides an overview of the body of research associated with imipenem-cilastatin/relebactam, beginning with an examination of the fundamental underpinnings of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic index. This is followed by the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic work that led to the approval of this novel drug combination, including data derived from checkerboard and hollow fiber infection studies, as well as large, multi-center, phase III clinical trials known as RESTORE-IMI 1 and RESTORE-IMI 2. The article also explores how this important new antibiotic may be used to treat other infections in the years to come, including hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia attributed to imipenem-non-susceptible pathogens and certain atypical mycobacterial infections.

Susceptibility to Imipenem/Relebactam of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates from Chinese Intra-Abdominal, Respiratory and Urinary Tract Infections: SMART 2015 to 2018

Purpose

In recent years, less options are available for treating carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The present study investigates the susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections (IAIs), respiratory tract infections (RTIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa in China.

Patients and Methods

A total of 1886 P. aeruginosa and 1889 A. baumannii isolates were collected in 21 centers (7 regions) as a part of the global SMART surveillance program between 2015 and 2018. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations using the broth microdilution methodology at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Results

For P. aeruginosa, overall susceptibility rates to imipenem/relebactam were 84.2% at a CLSI breakpoint of ≤2 mg/L compared to 55.7% for imipenem. Susceptibility rates of imipenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa to imipenem/relebactam were 64.4% and for multidrug-resistance (MDR) P. aeruginosa susceptibility rates were increased from 25.2% for imipenem to 65.8% for imipenem/relebactam. The susceptibilities of imipenem-non-susceptible and MDR P. aeruginosa strains were similarly restored by imipenem/relebactam in non-ICU and ICU wards. The rate of imipenem-non-susceptibilities A. baumannii isolates was 79.0%, whereas the MDR rate was 81.9%. Relebactam did not change the susceptibilities of imipenem-non susceptible or MDR A. baumannii isolates.

Conclusion

Imipenem/relebactam provides a therapy option to treat infections caused by MDR or imipenem-non-susceptible P. aeruginosa but not A. baumannii infections in China.

In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of clinical respiratory isolates to ceftazidime-avibactam and comparators (2016-2018)

BACKGROUND

This antimicrobial surveillance study reports in vitro antimicrobial activity and susceptibility data for a panel of agents against respiratory isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

METHODS

Isolates from respiratory specimens were collected in Africa/Middle East, Asia/South Pacific, Europe and Latin America between 2016 and 2018, as part of the Antimicrobial Testing Leadership and Surveillance (ATLAS) program. Broth microdilution methodology was used to quantify minimum inhibitory concentrations, from which rates of susceptibility were determined using EUCAST breakpoints (version 10). Rates of subsets with genes encoding β-lactamases (extended-spectrum β-lactamases [ESBLs], serine carbapenemases and metallo-β-lactamases [MBLs]) were also determined, as well as rates of multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa.

RESULTS

Among all respiratory Enterobacterales isolates, susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem, colistin and amikacin was ≥94.4% in each region. For Enterobacterales isolates that were ESBL-positive or carbapenemase-positive/MBL-negative, ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility was 93.6 and 98.9%, respectively. Fewer than 42.7% of MBL-positive Enterobacterales isolates were susceptible to any agents, except colistin (89.0% susceptible). Tigecycline susceptibility was ≥90.0% among Citrobacter koseri and Escherichia coli isolates, including all β-lactamase-positive subsets. ESBL-positive Enterobacterales were more commonly identified in each region than isolates that were ESBL/carbapenemase-positive; carbapenemase-positive/MBL-negative; or MBL-positive. Among all respiratory P. aeruginosa isolates, the combined susceptibility rates (susceptible at standard dosing regimen plus susceptible at increased exposure) were highest to ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin and amikacin (≥82.4% in each region). Susceptibility to colistin was ≥98.1% for all β-lactamase-positive subsets of P. aeruginosa. The lowest rates of antimicrobial susceptibility were observed among MBL-positive isolates of P. aeruginosa (≤56.6%), with the exception of colistin (100% susceptible). MDR P. aeruginosa were most frequently identified in each region (18.7-28.7%), compared with the subsets of ESBL-positive; carbapenemase-positive/MBL-negative; or MBL-positive isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of susceptibility among the collections of respiratory Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates were highest to ceftazidime-avibactam, colistin and amikacin in each region. Tigecycline was active against all subsets of C. koseri and E. coli, and colistin was active against all subsets of P. aeruginosa. The findings of this study indicate the need for continued antimicrobial surveillance among respiratory Gram-negative pathogens, in particular those with genes encoding MBLs.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam and comparators against gram-negative pathogens from patients with bloodstream infections in the United States and Canada - SMART 2018-2019

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are often caused by drug-resistant pathogens, and novel antimicrobials are needed. We examined the activity of imipenem/relebactam against BSI pathogens from US and Canada: >99% of non-Morganellaceae Enterobacterales, including 100% of MDR isolates, and >94% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were imipenem/relebactam-susceptible. Imipenem/relebactam could provide an important treatment option.

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam: A new carbapenem β-lactamase inhibitor combination

PURPOSE

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antimicrobial activity, efficacy, safety, and current regulatory status of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam are reviewed.

SUMMARY

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a newly approved anti-infective combination of a well-established β-lactam and a new β-lactamase inhibitor for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs), including pyelonephritis, and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) caused by susceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients 18 years of age or older with limited or no alternative treatment options. The antibiotic is also indicated for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). The antibiotic is active in vitro against a wide range of pathogens, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) such as Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase. The addition of relebactam does not restore the activity of imipenem against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Two phase 3 clinical trials of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam were conducted. In the RESTORE-IMI 1 trial, the efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was found to be comparable to that of imipenem/cilastatin plus colistin for the treatment of infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible gram-negative bacteria in patients with HABP/VABP, cUTIs, and cIAIs, with a significantly lower incidence of nephrotoxicity reported with the new antibiotic. The RESTORE-IMI 2 trial demonstrated the noninferiority of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam to piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of HABP/VABP. Commonly reported adverse events in clinical trials included anemia, elevated liver enzymes, electrolyte imbalances, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, headache, fever, phlebitis and/or infusion-site reactions, and hypertension.

CONCLUSION

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is a new β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against MDR gram-negative bacteria, including many CRE but excluding MBL-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. It is approved for the treatment of cUTIs, cIAIs, and HABP/VABP.

Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam: A Review in Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (Recarbrio™) is an intravenously administered combination of the carbapenem imipenem, the renal dehydropeptidase-I inhibitor cilastatin, and the novel β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam. Relebactam is a potent inhibitor of class A and class C β-lactamases, conferring imipenem activity against many imipenem-nonsusceptible strains. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is approved in the USA and EU for the treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP) in adults and other gram-negative infections, including complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) [including pyelonephritis] and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options. In pivotal phase II and III trials, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior to piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with HABP/VABP and to imipenem/cilastatin in patients with cUTIs and cIAIs. It was also effective in imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that of imipenem/cilastatin. Available evidence indicates that imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an effective and generally well tolerated option for gram-negative infections in adults, including critically ill and/or high-risk patients, and a potential therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

Imipenem-Relebactam Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Negative Bacilli by Agar Dilution, Disk Diffusion, and Gradient Strip Methods Compared with Broth Microdilution

This study aimed to determine whether agar dilution, research-use-only disk diffusion (Mast Group Ltd., Bootle Merseyside, UK), Etest (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC), and MIC test strip (MTS) (Liofilchem, Inc., Waltham, MA) methods yield equivalent results to those of broth microdilution (BMD) for imipenem-relebactam susceptibility testing using a collection of 297 Gram-negative bacilli, including members of the order Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, enriched for drug resistance. MIC and disk diameter results were interpreted using United States Food and Drug Administration breakpoints. Overall, 76.8% of the isolates tested were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam by BMD. MIC values for agar dilution, Etest, and MTS were not significantly different from that for BMD, although they tended to be 1 to 2 dilutions higher. Essential agreement was 95.6% for agar dilution, 90.6% for Etest, and 85.2% for MTS. Categorical agreement was 98.0% for agar dilution, 73.1% for disk diffusion, 96.3% for Etest, and 96.6% for MTS. In conclusion, agar dilution and Etest yielded comparable results to BMD for imipenem-relebactam.

Activity of imipenem/relebactam against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Europe: SMART 2015-17

OBJECTIVES

Relebactam is a diazabicyclooctane non-β-lactam inhibitor of Ambler class A and C β-lactamases that is in clinical development in combination with imipenem/cilastatin. The current study evaluated the in vitro activity of imipenem/relebactam against 5447 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa submitted to the SMART global surveillance programme in 2015-17 by 67 clinical laboratories in 22 European countries.

METHODS

MICs were determined using the CLSI broth microdilution reference method (Eleventh Edition: M07, 2018). Relebactam was tested at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/L in combination with doubling dilutions of imipenem. MICs were interpreted using EUCAST clinical breakpoints (version 8.1); imipenem breakpoints were applied to imipenem/relebactam.

RESULTS

Rates of susceptibility to imipenem and imipenem/relebactam (MIC ≤4 mg/L) were 69.4% and 92.4%, respectively, for all isolates of P. aeruginosa. Over one-third of all isolates (34.9%, 1902/5447) were MDR; lower respiratory tract isolates (38.3%, 1327/3461) were more frequently MDR than were intraabdominal (28.5%, 355/1245) or urinary tract (29.7%, 212/714) isolates. Of all MDR isolates, 78.2% were susceptible to imipenem/relebactam, a rate that was 50-77 percentage points higher than the rate of susceptibility to imipenem or any other β-lactam tested; rates of susceptibility to imipenem/relebactam were similar for MDR isolates from lower respiratory tract (77.8% susceptible), intraabdominal (80.3%) and urinary tract (76.4%) infections. Overall, relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 75.2% (1254/1668) of imipenem-non-susceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa and to 69.6% (947/1361) of imipenem-non-susceptible isolates with an MDR phenotype.

CONCLUSIONS

Relebactam restored in vitro susceptibility to imipenem for most imipenem-non-susceptible and MDR clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa from European patients.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam Versus Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Adults With Hospital-acquired or Ventilator-associated Bacterial Pneumonia (RESTORE-IMI 2 Study)

Background

Imipenem combined with the β-lactamase inhibitor relebactam has broad antibacterial activity, including against carbapenem-resistant gram-negative pathogens. We evaluated efficacy and safety of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam in treating hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP).

Methods

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 trial. Adults with HABP/VABP were randomized 1:1 to imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam 500 mg/500 mg/250 mg or piperacillin/tazobactam 4 g/500 mg, intravenously every 6 hours for 7–14 days. The primary endpoint was day 28 all-cause mortality in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population (patients who received study therapy, excluding those with only gram-positive cocci at baseline). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response 7–14 days after completing therapy in the MITT population.

Results

Of 537 randomized patients (from 113 hospitals in 27 countries), the MITT population comprised 264 imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 267 piperacillin/tazobactam patients; 48.6% had ventilated HABP/VABP, 47.5% APACHE II score ≥15, 24.7% moderate/severe renal impairment, 42.9% were ≥65 years old, and 66.1% were in the intensive care unit. The most common baseline pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (25.6%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (18.9%). Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam was noninferior (P < .001) to piperacillin/tazobactam for both endpoints: day 28 all-cause mortality was 15.9% with imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 21.3% with piperacillin/tazobactam (difference, −5.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −11.9% to 1.2%]), and favorable clinical response at early follow-up was 61.0% and 55.8%, respectively (difference, 5.0% [95% CI, −3.2% to 13.2%]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 26.7% of imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and 32.0% of piperacillin/tazobactam patients; AEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 5.6% and 8.2%, respectively; and drug-related AEs (none fatal) in 11.7% and 9.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam is an appropriate treatment option for gram-negative HABP/VABP, including in critically ill, high-risk patients.

Clinical Trials Registration

NCT02493764.

Comparison of Treatment Outcomes between Analysis Populations in the RESTORE-IMI 1 Phase 3 Trial of Imipenem-Cilastatin-Relebactam versus Colistin plus Imipenem-Cilastatin in Patients with Imipenem-Nonsusceptible Bacterial Infections

The RESTORE-IMI 1 phase 3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of imipenem-cilastatin (IMI) combined with relebactam (REL) for treating imipenem-nonsusceptible infections. The objective of this analysis was to compare the outcomes among patients meeting eligibility requirements based on central laboratory susceptibility versus local laboratory susceptibility. Patients with serious infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible, colistin-susceptible, and imipenem-REL-susceptible pathogens were randomized 2:1 to IMI-REL plus placebo or colistin plus IMI for 5 to 21 days. The primary endpoint was a favorable overall response. Key endpoints included the clinical response and all-cause mortality. We compared outcomes between the primary microbiological modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population, where eligibility was based on central laboratory susceptibility testing, and the supplemental mMITT (SmMITT) population, where eligibility was based on local, site-level testing. The SmMITT (n = 41) and MITT (n = 31) populations had similar baseline characteristics, including sex, age, illness severity, and renal function. In both analysis populations, favorable overall response rates in the IMI-REL treatment group were >70%. Favorable clinical response rates at day 28 were 71.4% for IMI-REL and 40.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 75.0% for IMI-REL and 53.8% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. Day 28 all-cause mortality rates were 9.5% for IMI-REL and 30.0% for colistin plus IMI in the mMITT population, whereas they were 10.7% for IMI-REL and 23.1% for colistin plus IMI in the SmMITT population. The outcomes in the SmMITT population were generally consistent with those in the mMITT population, suggesting that outcomes may be applicable to the real-world use of IMI-REL for treating infections caused by imipenem-nonsusceptible Gram-negative pathogens. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02452047.).

In vitro activity of imipenem-relebactam against resistant phenotypes of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from intraabdominal and urinary tract infection samples - SMART Surveillance Europe 2015-2017

Introduction. Infections attributable to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli are increasing globally. New antimicrobial agents are urgently needed to treat patients with these infections.Aim. To describe susceptibility to the novel carbapenem-β-lactamase inhibitor combination imipenem-relebactam and comparators of clinical isolates of non-Proteeae Enterobacteriaceae (NPE) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from intraabdominal infections (IAIs) and urinary tract infections (UTIs).Methods. Broth microdilution MICs were determined for isolates collected in 22 European countries in 2015-2017 and interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints; imipenem-relebactam MICs were interpreted using imipenem breakpoints.Results. For NPE, 98.4 % of isolates from IAIs (n=10,465) and 98.5 % of UTI isolates (n=7,446) were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, as were 42.4 % of imipenem-nonsusceptible (n=474), 98.6 % of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-positive (n=138), and 93.9 % of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates (n=4,424) from IAIs and UTIs combined. Molecular analysis demonstrated that two-thirds of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates rendered susceptible by relebactam carried KPCs; 96 % (261/271) of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates of NPE that remained nonsusceptible in the presence of relebactam carried metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-type and/or OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Among P. aeruginosa, 94.4 % of IAI (n=1,245) and 93.0 % of UTI isolates (n=714) were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam, as were 74.4 % of imipenem-nonsusceptible (n=469) and 79.8 % of MDR isolates (n=595) from IAIs and UTIs combined. Among the 120 isolates of P. aeruginosa that remained nonsusceptible to imipenem upon addition of relebactam, 72 % carried MBLs. The distribution of NPE and P. aeruginosa carrying carbapenemases varied substantially across Europe, as did resistance to imipenem and imipenem-relebactam.Conclusions. Continued surveillance of antimicrobial resistance and resistance mechanisms, including the study of imipenem-relebactam as it approaches regulatory approval, appears warranted.

Novel Tetracyclines Versus Alternative Antibiotics for Treating Acute Bacterial Infection: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

This meta-analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of novel tetracyclines for treating acute bacterial infections. Data from PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane databases, Ovid Medline, and Embase databases were accessed until 11 July 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of novel tetracyclines with that of other antibiotics for treating acute bacterial infections were included. Primary outcomes included the clinical response, microbiological response, and risk of adverse events (AEs). A total of eight RCTs were included, involving 2283 and 2197 patients who received novel tetracyclines and comparators, respectively. Overall, no significant difference was observed in the clinical response rate at test of cure between the experimental and control groups (for modified intent-to-treat [MITT] population, risk ratio [RR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.99–1.05; for clinically evaluable [CE] population, RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00–1.04; and for microbiological evaluable [ME] population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.04). No significant difference in the microbiological response at the end of treatment was observed between the experimental and control groups (for ME population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99–1.03; for microbiological MITT population, RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.96–1.07). No difference was observed concerning the risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events, and discontinuation of treatment due to TEAEs and all-cause mortality between the two groups. In conclusion, clinical efficacy and safety profile for novel tetracyclines in the treatment of acute bacterial infections were found to be similar to those for other available antibiotics.

A translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to characterize bacterial kill in the presence of imipenem-relebactam

OBJECTIVES

Relebactam is a small molecule β-lactamase inhibitor under clinical investigation for use as a fixed-dose combination with imipenem/cilastatin. Here we present a translational pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic mathematical model to support optimal dose selection of relebactam.

METHODS

Data derived from in vitro checkerboard and hollow fiber infection studies of imipenem-resistant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were incorporated into the model. The model integrates the effect of relebactam concentration on imipenem susceptibility in a semi-mechanistic manner using the checkerboard data and characterizes the bacterial time-kill profiles from the hollow fiber infection model data.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrated that the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve for free drug to the minimum inhibitory concentration (fAUC/MIC) was the pharmacokinetic driver for relebactam, with a target fAUC/MIC=7.5 associated with 2-log kill. At a clinical dose of 250mg relebactam, greater than 2-log reductions in bacterial load are projected for imipenem-resistant strains with an imipenem/relebactam MIC≤4μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

The study confirms that the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic driver for relebactam is fAUC/MIC, that an fAUC/MIC ratio of 7.5 is associated with 2-log kill in vitro, and that a 250mg clinical dose of relebactam achieves this target value when delivered in combination with imipenem/cilastatin.

Emerging therapies against infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa have been marked with the highest priority for surveillance and epidemiological research on the basis of parameters such as incidence, case fatality rates, chronicity of illness, available options for prevention and treatment, health-care utilization, and societal impact. P. aeruginosa is one of the six ESKAPE pathogens that are the major cause of nosocomial infections and are a global threat because of their capacity to become increasingly resistant to all available antibiotics. This review reports on current pre-clinical and clinical advances of anti-pseudomonal therapies in the fields of drug development, antimicrobial chemotherapy, vaccines, phage therapy, non-bactericidal pathoblockers, outer membrane sensitizers, and host defense reinforcement.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections in solid organ transplant recipients-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice

These updated guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Community of Practice of the American Society of Transplantation review the diagnosis, prevention, and management of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli in the pre- and post-transplant period. MDR Gram-negative bacilli, including carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, remain a threat to successful organ transplantation. Clinicians now have access to at least five novel agents with activity against some of these organisms, with others in the advanced stages of clinical development. No agent, however, provides universal and predictable activity against any of these pathogens, and very little is available to treat infections with MDR nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli including A baumannii. Despite advances, empiric antibiotics should be tailored to local microbiology and targeted regimens should be tailored to susceptibilities. Source control remains an important part of the therapeutic armamentarium. Morbidity and mortality associated with infections due to MDR Gram-negative organisms remain unacceptably high. Heightened infection control and antimicrobial stewardship initiatives are needed to prevent these infections, curtail their transmission, and limit the evolution of MDR Gram-negative pathogens, especially in the setting of organ transplantation.

Defining the Role of Novel β-Lactam Agents That Target Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Organisms

With the current carbapenem-resistant organism crisis, conventional approaches to optimizing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic parameters are frequently inadequate, and traditional salvage agents (eg, colistin, tigecycline, etc) confer high toxicity and/or have low efficacy. However, several β-lactam agents with activity against carbapenem-resistant organisms were approved recently by the US Food and Drug Administration, and more are anticipated to be approved in the near future. The primary goal of this review is to assist infectious disease practitioners with preferentially selecting 1 agent over another when treating patients infected with a carbapenem-resistant organism. However, resistance to some of these antibiotics has already developed. Antibiotic stewardship programs can ensure that they are reserved for situations in which other options are lacking and are paramount for the survival of these agents.

Developments on antibiotics for multidrug resistant bacterial Gram-negative infections

Introduction: The constantly increasing spread of severe infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) is a critical threat to the global medical community. After a long period of antibiotic pipeline pause, new antibiotic compounds are commercially available or are at late stages of clinical evaluation, promising to augment the therapeutic armamentarium of clinicians against deadly pathogens. Areas covered: This review summarizes available data regarding agents with potent activity against critical MDR Gram-negative pathogens, which urgently require new efficient antibiotics. Recently approved antibiotic formulations; and agents in advanced stages of development, including combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, novel cephalosporins (cefiderocol), tetracyclines (eravacycline), aminoglycosides (plazomicin), quinolones (delafloxacin and finafloxacin) and pleuromutilins (lefamulin) are discussed in this review. Expert opinion: The recent introduction of new antibiotics into clinical practice is an encouraging step after a long period of pipeline stagnation. New formulations will be a useful option for clinicians to treat serious infections caused by several MDR Gram-negative pathogens. However, most of the new compounds are based on modifications of traditional antibiotic structures challenging their longevity as therapeutic options. More investment is needed for the discovery and clinical development of truly innovative and effective antibiotics without cross-resistance to currently used antibiotics.

Longitudinal analysis of the in vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2012-2016

The in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents were analyzed against 14,330 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from 188 centers distributed globally (except North America) from 2012 (2014 for colistin) to 2016 as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program. Susceptibility testing used in-house prepared broth microdilution panels following CLSI guidelines. Multiplex PCR assays identified the presence of β-lactamases. Ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC₉₀ 8 mg/L; 91.5% susceptibility) and colistin (N = 11,032; MIC₉₀ 2 mg/L, 96.2%) were the 2 most active agents. Susceptibility of multidrug-resistant isolates (N = 3770, 26.3%) was ≤54.4% to all agents except colistin (N = 2956; 95.2% susceptible) and ceftazidime-avibactam (68.2%). Metallo-β-lactamase-positive isolates (N = 621, 4.3%) were not susceptible to any agents except colistin (N = 504; 98.2% susceptible). Novel therapeutic options are needed for infections caused by P. aeruginosa-resistant phenotypes.

Activity of imipenem-relebactam against multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa from the United States - SMART 2015-2017

A total of 2732 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected at 26 United States clinical laboratories in 2015-2017 were tested for susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam. Imipenem-relebactam MICs were interpreted using 2018 CLSI M100 imipenem breakpoints for P. aeruginosa. A total of 93.9% of P. aeruginosa isolates were susceptible to imipenem-relebactam. Among MDR isolates (n = 750), susceptibility to imipenem-relebactam was 79.7%, 46-73 percentage points higher than to other β-lactams tested. Relebactam restored imipenem susceptibility to 78.3% of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates (n = 766) and to 69.6% of imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates with MDR phenotypes (n = 500).

Current trends in the treatment of pneumonia due to multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Pneumonia is one of the most common infections worldwide. Morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs increase substantially when pneumonia is caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB). The ongoing spread of antimicrobial resistance has made treating MDR-GNB pneumonia increasingly difficult. Fortunately, there have been some recent additions to our antibiotic armamentarium in the US and Europe for MDR-GNB, along with several agents that are in advanced stages of development. In this article, we review the risk factors for and current management of MDR-GNB pneumonia as well as novel agents with activity against these important and challenging pathogens.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: A Multicenter Study

Background

Multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections remain common in hospitals worldwide. We investigated the outcomes associated with the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of these infections.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively from 20 hospitals across the United States about adults who received ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infections of any source for at least 24 hours. The primary outcome was a composite of 30-day and inpatient mortality, and secondary outcomes were clinical success and microbiological cure. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with outcomes.

Results

Two-hundred five patients were included in the study. Severe illness and high degrees of comorbidity were common, with median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II scores of 19 (interquartile range [IQR], 11–24) and median Charlson Comorbidity Indexes of 4 (IQR, 3–6). Delayed initiation of ceftolozane-tazobactam was common with therapy started a median of 9 days after culture collection. Fifty-nine percent of patients had pneumonia. On susceptibility testing, 125 of 139 (89.9%) isolates were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Mortality occurred in 39 patients (19%); clinical success and microbiological cure were 151 (73.7%) and 145 (70.7%), respectively. On multivariable regression analysis, starting ceftolozane-tazobactam within 4 days of culture collection was associated with survival (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 5.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.14–14.40), clinical success (adjusted OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.40–6.10), and microbiological cure (adjusted OR, 2.59; 95% CI, 1.24–5.38).

Conclusions

Ceftolozane-tazobactam appeared to be effective in the treatment of multidrug-resistant P aeruginosa infections, particularly when initiated early after the onset of infection.