1
|
Ishii R, Ohkoshi A, Katori Y. Treatment of elderly patients with head and neck cancer in an aging society: Focus on geriatric assessment and surgical treatment. Auris Nasus Larynx 2024; 51:647-658. [PMID: 38631257 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Previous studies of the treatment of elderly head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were very limited and sometimes controversial. Although conclusions differ across various reports, it is often concluded that advanced chronological age does not directly affect prognosis, but that comorbidities and declines in physical and cognitive functions promote the occurrence of adverse events, especially with surgical treatment. Geriatric assessment (GA) and its screening tools are keys to help us understand overall health status and problems, predict life expectancy and treatment tolerance, and to influence treatment choices and interventions to improve treatment compliance. In addition, personal beliefs and values play a large role in determining policies for HNC treatment for elderly patients, and a multidisciplinary approach is important to support this. In this review, past research on HNC in older adults is presented, and the current evidence is explained, focusing on the management of elderly HNC patients, with an emphasis on the existing reports on each treatment stage and modality, especially the surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| | - Akira Ohkoshi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Yukio Katori
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Palmer AD, Starmer H, Sathe N, Yao TJ, Bolognone RK, Edwards J, Crino C, Kizner J, Graville DJ. Use of the G8 Geriatric Screening Tool in Surgical Head and Neck Cancer Patients Requiring Rehabilitation: A Multisite Investigation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2024; 133:158-168. [PMID: 37551009 DOI: 10.1177/00034894231191869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The G8 is a well-validated screening test for older cancer patients. The current study was undertaken to determine whether the G8 is predictive of short-term post-operative outcomes after head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery. METHODS Consecutive patients aged 65 years or more and referred for a preoperative assessment by a speech-language pathologist were consecutively screened by clinicians at 2 academic medical centers using the G8. The G8 was used to screen for vulnerability prior to surgery. Patients were deemed vulnerable if they had a total G8 score ≤14 according to published guidelines. Data were also collected on demographic characteristics, tumor staging, post-operative course, and tracheostomy and feeding tube (FT) status. RESULTS Ninety patients were consecutively screened during the study period. Using the G8, 64% of the patients were deemed vulnerable. Vulnerable patients differed significantly from non-vulnerable patients with regard to age, health, tumor stage, and baseline dysphagia, and underwent more extensive surgery. Postoperatively, vulnerable patients had a significantly longer hospital length of stay (LOS; 10.17 vs 5.50 days, respectively, P < .001), were less likely to discharge home (76% vs 94%, P = .044), and were more likely to be FT dependent for over a month (54% vs 21%, P = .006) compared to non-vulnerable patients. In regression models, controlling for T-stage and surgical variables, the G8 independently predicted 2 post-operative outcomes of interest, namely LOS and FT dependency. CONCLUSIONS The G8 may be a useful screening tool for identifying older adults at risk of a protracted postoperative medical course after HNC surgery. Future research should aim to identify the optimal screening protocol and how this information can be incorporated into clinical pathways to enhance the post-operative outcomes of older HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Palmer
- Northwest Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Heather Starmer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Nishad Sathe
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Theresa Jingyun Yao
- Head and Neck Speech and Swallowing Rehabilitation Center, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Rachel K Bolognone
- Northwest Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jeffrey Edwards
- Head and Neck Speech and Swallowing Rehabilitation Center, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Carrie Crino
- Northwest Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Jennifer Kizner
- Head and Neck Speech and Swallowing Rehabilitation Center, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA USA
| | - Donna J Graville
- Northwest Center for Voice & Swallowing, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kouketsu A, Kaneuji T, Yamaguma Y, Yamauchi K, Sugiura T, Takahashi T, Ito H, Yamashita Y. Microvascular reconstruction for oral cancer in older adult patients: the impact of age on surgical outcomes. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2024; 137:6-11. [PMID: 37612162 DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Flap complications continue to be a challenge in microsurgical reconstruction for older adults. We aimed to evaluate the impact of age on surgical outcomes after microvascular reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN We retrospectively investigated 103 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone microvascular reconstruction surgery to compare microsurgical reconstruction, common postoperative complications, and flap success rates in geriatric (>75 years) and non-geriatric (<75 years) patients. We also evaluated differences based on the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score. RESULTS We found no significant differences between the geriatric and non-geriatric groups in peri-operative, postoperative, or general complications. Conversely, we found that delirium and aspiration pneumonia were significantly more likely to occur in geriatric patients and that multiple medical complications were significantly more likely to occur in geriatric patients with a high American Society of Anesthesiologists score. CONCLUSION Microvascular reconstruction can be performed effectively and without excessive complications in geriatric patients, and age should not be considered a contraindication for this procedure. Comorbidities play a stronger role in the prediction of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsumu Kouketsu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan; Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology and Surgical Sciences, Department of Disease Management Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Kaneuji
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yu Yamaguma
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Kensuke Yamauchi
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Disease Management Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Sugiura
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology and Surgical Sciences, Department of Disease Management Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tetsu Takahashi
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Oncology and Surgical Sciences, Department of Disease Management Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan; Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Disease Management Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Ito
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Miyazaki, Faculty of Medicine, Miyazaki, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Yamashita
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bakas AT, Polinder-Bos HA, Streng F, Mattace-Raso FUS, Ziere G, de Jong RJB, Sewnaik A. Frailty in Non-geriatric Patients With Head and Neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1215-1224. [PMID: 37264978 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are characterized by a poor lifestyle and comorbidity. The Geriatric 8 (G8) is an established screening tool to identify frail older patients with cancer. However, studies evaluating frailty in younger HNC patients are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the G8 can identify frailty and if it is related to mortality in younger HNC patients. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study design. SETTING Tertiary cancer center. METHODS We studied patients <70 years with HNC. Patients with G8 ≤ 14 were considered frail. Patients were matched to nonfrail (G8 > 14) control patients. Patients were matched according to sex, age, smoking, tumor location, and period of first consultation. Baseline health characteristics were compared between frail patients and nonfrail controls. Second, the treatment plan and adverse outcomes were compared. RESULTS Forty-five patients with G8 ≤ 14 were included and matched to 90 nonfrail controls. The median follow-up time was 357 days. Frail patients had a significantly lower body mass index and level of education, a worse World Health Organization performance status, and reported lower experienced overall health. 28.9% of the frail patients died after 1 year versus 10% of the nonfrail control patients (hazard ratio: 3.87 [95% confidence interval: 1.32-11.36], p = 0.014). CONCLUSION The G8 is a valid screening tool to identify frail patients in younger HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay T Bakas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harmke A Polinder-Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur Streng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijsbertus Ziere
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Raab GT, Restifo D, Tin AL, Vickers AJ, McBride SM, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Zakeri K, Shahrokni A. Differential use of postoperative psychosocial and physical services among older adults with head and neck cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101609. [PMID: 37678051 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Older adults undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery often have significant functional and mental health impairments. We examined use of postoperative physical, nutritional, and psychosocial services among a cohort of older adults with HNC comanaged by geriatricians and surgeons. MATERIALS AND METHODS Our sample consisted of older adults who were referred to the Geriatrics Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2015 and 2019 and took a geriatric assessment (GA) prior to undergoing HNC surgery. Physical, nutritional, and psychosocial service utilization was assessed. Physical services included a physical, occupational, or rehabilitation consult during the patient's stay. Nutritional services consisted of speech and swallow or nutritional consult. Psychosocial services consisted of psychiatry, psychology, or a social work consult. Relationships between each service use, geriatric deficits, demographic, and surgical characteristics were assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Chi-square test. RESULTS In total, 157 patients were included, with median age of 80 and length of stay of six days. The most common GA impairments were major distress (61%), depression (59%), social activity limitation (SAL) (54%), and deficits in activities of daily living (ADL) (44%). Nutritional and physical services were used much more frequently than psychosocial services (80% and 85% vs 31%, respectively). Receipt of services was associated with longer median length of hospital stay, operation time, and greater deficits in ADLs. SAL was associated with physical and psychosocial consult and lower Timed Up and Go (TUG) score; instrumental ADL (iADL) deficits were associated with physical services; and depression and distress were associated with psychosocial services. DISCUSSION The burden of psychosocial deficits is high among older adults with HNC. Future work is needed to understand the limited utilization of psychosocial services in this population as well as whether referral to psychosocial services can reduce the burden of these deficits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sean M McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard J Wong
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Katsuta T, Nishibuchi I, Nomura M, Kondo M, Hamamoto T, Ueda T, Batsuuri B, Sadatoki T, Imano N, Hirokawa J, Murakami Y. Efficacy of Supportive Care for Radiodermatitis in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Supplementary Analysis of an Exploratory Phase II Trial. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1387. [PMID: 37763155 PMCID: PMC10533091 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13091387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Self-care demonstrated efficacy in preventing severe acute radiation dermatitis among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT). This prospective trial aimed to confirm the feasibility and safety of transcutaneous electrical sensory stimulation while examining the relationship between changes in self-care behavior through supportive care interventions and the severity of acute radiation dermatitis during CRT. Patients underwent assessments for dermatitis grading (Grades 1 to ≥3) and were interviewed regarding self-care practices. The self-care questionnaires comprised six items, and a point was deducted for each task that the patient could not perform independently. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the association between G3 radiation dermatitis and the lowest self-care behavior scores. Of the 10 patients enrolled, three experienced G3 dermatitis. During CRT, six patients maintained their initial scores and did not develop ≥G3 dermatitis. Meanwhile, three of four patients with decreased scores exhibited ≥G3 dermatitis. The group with ≥G3 dermatitis had significantly lower scores than those with ≤G2 dermatitis, suggesting that the inability of patients to perform self-care routinely may lead to severe acute radiation dermatitis. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential of self-care interventions in preventing severe dermatitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsuyoshi Katsuta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| | - Ikuno Nishibuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| | - Megumi Nomura
- Department of Nursing, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (M.N.); (M.K.)
| | - Miho Kondo
- Department of Nursing, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (M.N.); (M.K.)
| | - Takao Hamamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.H.); (T.U.)
| | - Tsutomu Ueda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.H.); (T.U.)
| | - Bilegsaikhan Batsuuri
- Department of Radiotherapy, National Cancer Center of Mongolia, Nam-Yan-Ju Street, Bayan Zurkh District, Ulaanbaatar 13370, Mongolia;
| | - Takashi Sadatoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| | - Nobuki Imano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| | - Junichi Hirokawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| | - Yuji Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University Hospital, 1-2-3, Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan; (T.K.); (T.S.); (N.I.); (J.H.); (Y.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deldycke A, Denys H, Decruyenaere A, Velghe A, Naert E. Clinical decision-making in older patients with cancer: a cross-sectional single-centre study to assess the impact of clinical judgement and patient preferences. Acta Clin Belg 2023; 78:103-111. [PMID: 36879530 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2022.2074702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The heterogeneity in the population of older patients with cancer makes clinical decision-making difficult. We investigated the agreement between the G8 score and clinical judgment in frailty assessments, determined the impact of a life-expectancy calculator, and explored patient and caregiver preferences towards the treatment goal. METHODS Patients aged ≥75 years in need of new oncological treatment were prospectively enrolled between June 2020 and February 2021. Frailty was estimated by the oncologist and caregiver and compared to the G8 estimation. We examined whether the oncologist changed the fit/frail estimation based on life expectancy calculated using the ePrognosis tool. The main treatment goals, either longevity or quality of life (QoL), from the patient's and caregiver's perspective were noted and compared. RESULTS Forty-nine patients were included in the analysis. Comparison of the oncologist's and the caregiver's frailty estimation with the G8 assessment showed agreement and a Kappa coefficient of 58.3% (0.231) and 60% (0.255), respectively. The ePrognosis score and the odds of change in the frailty estimation by the oncologist showed no correlation. Regarding preferences, 28 (57.1%) and 17 (34.7%) patients and eighteen (47.3%) and seventeen (44.7%) caregivers chose longevity and QoL, respectively. The observed agreement and Kappa coefficient were 78.8% and 0.578. CONCLUSION Compared to the G8 assessment, frailty was underestimated by both oncologists and caregivers. Most of the patients chose longevity over QoL, and the preferences between the patient and the caregiver matched in the majority of cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies Deldycke
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | - Anja Velghe
- Geriatrics Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dickstein DR, Powers AE, Vujovic D, Roof S, Bakst RL. Clinical and Therapeutic Considerations for Older Adults with Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:409-422. [PMID: 36959837 PMCID: PMC10029371 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s366155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 30% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age, and this percentage is expected to increase as the population increases and lives longer. Elderly patients are underrepresented in head and neck oncology clinical trials, and there is minimal evidence on the management of HNSCC for this population. Subsequently, despite their best intentions, physicians may unknowingly recommend an ill-suited course of therapy, which may result in suboptimal oncological or functional outcomes or adverse events. Surgical approaches have the potential to carry a higher risk of morbidity and mortality in older adults, especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. Definitive radiation therapy treatment in patients with HNSCC frequently involves 7 weeks of daily radiation, sometimes with concurrent chemotherapy, and this demanding treatment can be difficult for older adult patients, which may lead to treatment interruptions, potential removal of concurrent systemic therapy, compromised outcomes, and diminished quality of life. There are clinical trials currently underway investigating altered fractionation regimens and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. This review provides an overview of how best to approach an older adult with HNSCC, from initial work-up to treatment selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ann E Powers
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dragan Vujovic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Scott Roof
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Richard L Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Correspondence: Richard L Bakst, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1184 5th Avenue 1st Fl, Box 1236, New York, NY, 10029, USA, Tel/Fax +1 212 241 3545, Email
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Magnuson A, Van der Walde N, McKoy JM, Wildes TM, Wong ML, Le-Rademacher J, Little RF, Klepin HD. Integrating Geriatric Assessment Measures into National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2022; 2022:142-150. [PMID: 36519816 PMCID: PMC9949568 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
To improve the care of older adults with cancer, the traditional approach to clinical trial design needs to be reconsidered. Older adults are underrepresented in clinical trials with limited or no information on geriatric-specific factors, such as cognition or comorbidities. To address this knowledge gap and increase relevance of therapeutic clinical trial results to the real-life population, integration of aspects relevant to older adults is needed in oncology clinical trials. Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multidimensional tool comprising validated measures assessing specific health domains that are more frequently affected in older adults, including aspects related to physical function, comorbidity, medication use (polypharmacy), cognitive and psychological status, social support, and nutritional status. There are several mechanisms for incorporating either the full GA or specific GA measures into oncology therapeutic clinical trials to contribute to the overarching goal of the trial. Mechanisms include utilizing GA measures to better characterize the trial population, define trial eligibility, allocate treatment receipt within the context of the trial, develop predictive models for treatment outcomes, guide supportive care strategies, personalize care delivery, and assess longitudinal changes in GA domains. The objective of this manuscript is to review how GA measures can contribute to the overall goal of a clinical trial, to provide a framework to guide the selection and integration of GA measures into clinical trial design, and ultimately enable accrual of older adults to clinical trials by facilitating the design of trials tailored to older adults treated in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Magnuson
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Wilmot Cancer Institute, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Noam Van der Walde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - June M McKoy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tanya M Wildes
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Melisa L Wong
- Divisions of Hematology and Oncology and Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Richard F Little
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Correspondence to: Heidi D. Klepin, MD, MS, Section on Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston Salem, NC 27157, USA (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Nonsurgical Treatment Strategies for Elderly Head and Neck Cancer Patients: An Emerging Subject Worldwide. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14225689. [PMID: 36428780 PMCID: PMC9688456 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14225689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Consistent with the increasing rate of head and neck cancers among elderly adults, there has been an increase in the rate of those receiving nonsurgical treatments to maintain their function and quality of life. However, various problems, such as poor tolerance to chemoradiotherapy-related toxicity, are of greater concern in elderly adults than in younger individuals. In this review, we describe adverse events that should be particularly noted in elderly patients and provide an overview of countermeasures in nonsurgical treatments. We mainly focus on cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy-the primary treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Furthermore, we review the molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for elderly patients with HNSCC. Although the number of older patients is increasing worldwide, clinical trials aimed at determining the standard of care typically enroll younger or well-conditioned elderly patients. There is still very little evidence for treating elderly HNSCC older patients, and the question of optimal treatment needs to be explored.
Collapse
|
11
|
Restifo D, Raab G, McBride SM, Pfister DG, Wong RJ, Lee NY, Shahrokni A, Zakeri K. Correlation of an Electronic Geriatric Assessment With Receipt of Adjuvant Radiation and Chemotherapy in Older Adults With Head and Neck Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101096. [PMID: 36483055 PMCID: PMC9723299 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Treatment patterns for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) vary among older adults because of concerns about their health status. Geriatric assessment may guide treatment for older adults with HNSCC by assessing their health status. Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective review of adjuvant treatment received by older patients with HNSCC who completed a novel geriatric assessment, the electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment, before treatment. The electronic Rapid Fitness Assessment yields an accumulated geriatric deficits (AGD) score. Higher AGD score indicates greater frailty. Comparators were age and performance status. The Wilcoxon rank sum test compared differences between those who did and did not receive adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Results The cohort included 73 patients, of whom 56 (77%) had oral cavity cancer. The most common geriatric deficits were major distress, social activity limitation, depression, and impaired activities of daily living. AGD score, age, and performance status were not associated with receipt of adjuvant radiation. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly lower median AGD score than those who did not (3 vs 6; P = .044), but there was no association with age and performance status. Of the 17 patients with newly diagnosed disease and either positive margins or extranodal extension, only 9 received adjuvant radiation and only 3 received systemic therapy. Most often, systemic therapy was omitted because of patient preference or comorbidities and poor performance status. There was a nonstatistically significant lower AGD score between patients who did and did not receive standard fractionated radiation therapy (median, 4 vs 6.5; P = .13). Conclusions Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with frailty. Rates of chemotherapy utilization were very low, indicating the need for novel strategies to mitigate the toxicity burden in this patient population. Receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was not associated with frailty; however, there was a trend toward lower frailty among those who did receive radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriel Raab
- Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | | | - Richard J. Wong
- Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Armin Shahrokni
- Geriatrics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kaveh Zakeri
- Departments of Radiation Oncology,Corresponding author: Kaveh Zakeri, MD, MAS
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shah HP, Cohen O, Sukys J, Dibble J, Mehra S. The impact of frailty on adjuvant treatment in patients with head and neck free flap reconstruction-A retrospective study using two independent frailty scores. Oral Oncol 2022; 132:106006. [PMID: 35835056 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Reconstructive surgery may result in prolonged postoperative recovery, especially in frail patients, which in turn may impact delivery of adjuvant therapy. To date, no studies have investigated potential associations between frailty and adjuvant treatment delivery after reconstructive surgery. We examine the impact of frailty on time to initiation, duration, and completion of adjuvant treatment after reconstructive surgery for head and neck cancers (HNCs). METHODS A retrospective review of patients who underwent free flap reconstruction for HNC at a single institution from 2015 to 2021 and received adjuvant radiation was performed. Frailty was assessed using two independent scales: the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI) score and binary Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty indicator. Timely adjuvant initiation (within six weeks of surgery), duration of adjuvant treatment, and completion were compared between frail and non-frail patients. RESULTS Of the 163 patients included for analysis, 52 (31.9%) were identified as frail by the ACG indicator and 24 (14.7%) were identified as frail with an mFI score ≥ 3. Frail patients (mFI score ≥ 3) were significantly less likely than non-frail patients to initiate adjuvant treatment within six weeks (OR:0.21, CI:0.04-0.85, p = 0.046). Frailty designated by either frailty scale was not significantly associated with adjuvant treatment duration. Likelihood of adjuvant treatment completion was significantly lower for frail compared to non-frail patients by both scales: ACG indicator (OR 0.02, CI:9.05 × 10-4-0.25, p = 0.007) and mFI score ≥ 3 (OR:0.01, CI:6.85 × 10-4-0.13, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS Frailty is associated with decreased likelihood of timely adjuvant treatment initiation and completion in patients with HNCs after free flap reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hemali P Shah
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Oded Cohen
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jordan Sukys
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jacqueline Dibble
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Saral Mehra
- Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dickstein DR, Lehrer EJ, Hsieh K, Hotca A, Jones BM, Powers A, Sharma S, Liu J, Gupta V, Mell L, Husain Z, Kirke D, Misiukiewicz K, Posner M, Genden E, Bakst RL. Management of Older Adults with Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112809. [PMID: 35681789 PMCID: PMC9179912 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Approximately one third of patients with head and neck cancer are older adults. The number of older adults with head and neck cancer continues to rise especially as life expectancy increases. However, this population remains significantly underrepresented in clinical trials. Due to this, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal treatment for older adults with head and neck cancer. In general, older adults are a complex cohort due to variations in functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Treatment for head and neck cancer involves surgery, radiation therapy, systemic therapy, or a combination. These treatments are highly demanding. Additionally, they are associated with toxicity which can be especially difficult for older adults to tolerate. This may lead to treatment interruptions and compromised outcomes. In order to understand the optimal treatment for older adults with head and neck cancer, novel predictive scores are being developed. Additionally, ongoing clinical trials are investigating less intensive treatments for older adults. This review provides an overview of current clinical data, treatment considerations, and future areas of investigation for older adults with head and neck cancer. Abstract Thirty percent of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at least 70 years of age. This number continues to rise as life expectancy continues to increase. Still, older adults with HNSCC remain underrepresented in clinical trials, resulting in ambiguity on optimal management. Older adults are a complex patient population, often requiring increased support due to issues relating to functional and performance status, medical comorbidities, and medication management. Furthermore, in older adults with HNSCC, many of these conditions are independently associated with increased toxicity and worse outcomes. Toxicity in the older adult remains difficult to predict and to understand, and as treatment decisions are based on treatment tolerability, it is essential to understand the toxicities and how to minimize them. Novel predictive scores are being developed specifically for older adults with HNSCC to understand toxicity and to assist in personalized treatment decisions. There are clinical trials presently underway that are investigating shortened radiation courses and novel, less toxic systemic treatments in this population. In the forthcoming sections, we provide a detailed overview of the clinical data, treatment paradigms, and considerations in this population. This review provides a comprehensive overview of existing clinical data and clinical considerations in the older adult head and neck cancer population. Additionally, we provide a detailed overview of pertinent current and ongoing clinical trials, as well as future areas for investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R. Dickstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Eric J. Lehrer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Kristin Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Alexandra Hotca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Brianna M. Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Ann Powers
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Sonam Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Jerry Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
| | - Loren Mell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92110, USA;
| | - Zain Husain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada;
| | - Diana Kirke
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Krzysztof Misiukiewicz
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (K.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Marshall Posner
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (K.M.); (M.P.)
| | - Eric Genden
- Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (A.P.); (D.K.); (E.G.)
| | - Richard L. Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (D.R.D.); (E.J.L.); (K.H.); (A.H.); (B.M.J.); (S.S.); (J.L.); (V.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cleere EF, Davey MG, O'Neill JP. "Age is just a number"; frailty as a marker of peri-operative risk in head and neck surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck 2022; 44:1927-1939. [PMID: 35653114 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frailty refers to a patient's reduced capacity to withstand stressors due to a reduction in physiologic reserves. We assessed the impact of frailty on outcomes following head and neck surgery. METHODS We performed a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS Fourteen studies incorporating 182 059 patients were included in qualitative synthesis with 15 953 (8.8%) of patients deemed as frail. Meta-analysis incorporating nine studies demonstrated that frailty is associated with an increased 30 day postoperative morbidity (OR 2.74; 95% CI 1.98-3.80; p < 0.01) and meta-analysis with six studies suggested increased 30-day mortality (OR 2.94; 95% CI 2.62-3.31; p < 0.01). Preliminary meta-analyses between two and five studies suggested that frail patients had reduced overall survival and were more likely to be discharged to a nonhome location or readmitted within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS Frailty appears to be associated with poor short-term outcomes following head and neck surgery and may improve understanding of an individual patient's peri-operative risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eoin F Cleere
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matthew G Davey
- The Lambe Institute for Translational Research, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
| | - James P O'Neill
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.,The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morse RT, Ganju RG, Gan GN, Cao Y, Neupane P, Kakarala K, Shnayder Y, Lominska CE. Sarcopenia and Treatment Toxicity in Older Adults Undergoing Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer: Identifying Factors to Predict Frailty. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092094. [PMID: 35565223 PMCID: PMC9103923 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This study was performed to identify treatment related toxicities in older adults undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer and nutritional and skeletal muscle measures that might identify frailty. Imaging analysis was done with the following skeletal muscle measurements: skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), and skeletal muscle gauge (SMG). Patients were dichotomized by age into younger (<70 years old, 221 patients) and older age groups (≥70 years old, 51 patients). Low SMI was more common in older patients (86.7%) compared to younger patients (51.7%, p < 0.01), as were low SMD (57.8% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.012) and low SMG (76.1% vs. 44.2%, p < 0.01), despite having similar BMIs (27.3 kg/m2 versus 27.7 kg/m2, p = 0.71). Older patients were significantly more likely to experience chemotherapy toxicity than younger patients (54.9% versus 32.3%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis age (p < 0.01), current smoking status (p < 0.01), and low SMI (p < 0.01) remained as significant predictors for missed chemotherapy cycles or discontinuation. Older patients were more likely to require ≥5-day radiation breaks than younger patients (27.5% versus 8.6%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, age (p < 0.01), low albumin status (p = 0.03), and low SMI (p = 0.04) were identified as predictors of prolonged radiation treatment breaks. Based on the results of our study, sarcopenia may be used as an additional marker for frailty alongside traditional performance status scales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan T. Morse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospital, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Rohit G. Ganju
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA 30067, USA;
| | - Gregory N. Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (G.N.G.); (Y.C.); (C.E.L.)
| | - Ying Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (G.N.G.); (Y.C.); (C.E.L.)
| | - Prakash Neupane
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA;
| | - Kiran Kakarala
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (K.K.); (Y.S.)
| | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (K.K.); (Y.S.)
| | - Christopher E. Lominska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (G.N.G.); (Y.C.); (C.E.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Corry J, Ng WT, Ma SJ, Singh AK, de Graeff P, Oosting SF. Disadvantaged Subgroups Within the Global Head and Neck Cancer Population: How Can We Optimize Care? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-10. [PMID: 35439036 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Within the global head and neck cancer population, there are subgroups of patients with poorer cancer outcomes independent from tumor characteristics. In this article, we review three such groups. The first group comprises patients with nasopharyngeal cancer in low- and middle-income countries where access to high-volume, well-resourced radiotherapy centers is limited. We discuss a recent study that is aiming to improve outcomes through the instigation of a comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance program. The second group comprises patients with low socioeconomic status in a high-income country who experience substantial financial toxicity, defined as financial hardship for patients due to health care costs. We review causes and consequences of financial toxicity and discuss how it can be mitigated. The third group comprises older patients who may poorly tolerate and not benefit from intensive standard-of-care treatment. We discuss the role of geriatric assessment, particularly in relation to the use of chemotherapy. Through better recognition and understanding of disadvantaged groups within the global head and neck cancer population, we will be better placed to instigate the necessary changes to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Corry
- Division Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Radiation OncologySt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of MedicineThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of MedicineThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Clinical Oncology CentreThe University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Pauline de Graeff
- University Center for Geriatric MedicineUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ishii R, Ohkoshi A, Kiyota N, Matsuura K, Yasuda K, Imamura Y, Saito Y, Homma A. Management of elderly patients with head and neck cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:313-321. [PMID: 35165732 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
There are no established guidelines for managing older patients with head and neck cancer. Most clinical trials that define current standard therapy included few elderly patients. On the other hand, there is great variability in patients' comorbidities, physical functions, cognitive function, familial and financial background and values. The key point appears to be appropriate geriatric assessment, clarifying the patients' outcomes and a multidisciplinary team approach, including the treatment decision-making policy. Although these processes should be scientific in nature, the evidence for the treatment of elderly head and neck patients is very limited. This review summarizes the evidence available regarding the management of geriatric assessment, each treatment modality and the multidisciplinary team approach for older patients with head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryo Ishii
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Akira Ohkoshi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Naomi Kiyota
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kazuto Matsuura
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Koichi Yasuda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Imamura
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yuki Saito
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Homma
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Skelly A, O'Donovan A. Recognizing Frailty in Radiation Oncology Clinical Practice: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:115-124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Abstract
Cancer is predominantly a disease of aging, and older adults represent the majority of cancer diagnoses and deaths. Older adults with cancer differ significantly from younger patients, leading to important distinctions in cancer treatment planning and decision-making. As a consequence, the field of geriatric oncology has blossomed and evolved over recent decades, as the need to bring personalized cancer care to older adults has been increasingly recognized and a focus of study. The geriatric assessment (GA) has become the cornerstone of geriatric oncology research, and the past year has yielded promising results regarding the implementation of GA into routine cancer treatment decisions and outcomes for older adults. In this article, we provide an overview of the field of geriatric oncology and highlight recent breakthroughs with the use of GA in cancer care. Further work is needed to continue to provide personalized, evidence-based care for each older adult with cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
McDowell L, Rischin D, Gough K, Henson C. Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychosocial Distress and Unmet Needs in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:834068. [PMID: 35242716 PMCID: PMC8885992 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.834068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the most common cancer involving the mucosal surfaces of the head and neck and is associated with a number of etiological factors, including cigarette smoking, alcohol and betel nut consumption and exposure to high-risk human papillomavirus. The risk of HNSCC increases with age, peaking in the seventh and eighth decade, but this varies by anatomical and histological subtype. While several advancements have been made in the treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC) in recent decades, undertaking curative treatment still subjects the majority of HNSCC patients to substantial treatment-related toxicity requiring patients to tolerate a gamut of physical, psychological, and emotional demands on their reserves. In conjunction with other patient-related factors, clinicians involved in treating patients with HNSCC may incorporate advancing chronological age into their decision-making process when determining treatment recommendations. While advancing chronological age may be associated with increased concerns regarding physical treatment tolerability, clinicians may also be concerned about heightened vulnerability in various health and wellbeing outcomes. The available literature, however, does not provide evidence of this vulnerability in patients with advancing age, and, in many instances, older patients self-report greater resilience compared to their younger counterparts. While this data is reassuring it is limited by selection bias and heterogeneity in trial and study design and the absence of a consistent definition of the elderly patient with HNSCC. This narrative review article also includes a review of the measures used to assess HRQL, psychosocial outcomes and unmet needs in elderly or older patients with HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lachlan McDowell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Danny Rischin
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karla Gough
- Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, VIC, Australia
| | - Christina Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Fasano M, D’Onofrio I, Belfiore MP, Angrisani A, Caliendo V, Della Corte CM, Pirozzi M, Facchini S, Caterino M, Guida C, Nardone V, Reginelli A, Cappabianca S. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Elderly Patients: Role of Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030472. [PMID: 35158740 PMCID: PMC8833743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The focus of this review deals with the management of elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, discussing the role of clinical management, geriatric evaluation and therapeutic approaches (radiation therapy and systemic therapies). Abstract Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) constitute the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, with approximately 25–40% of the diagnosed patients older than 70 years. HNSCC patients are often frail and frequently have multiple comorbidities due to their unhealthy lifestyle, and evidence suggests that older patients may receive less aggressive and suboptimal treatment than younger patients with the same disease status. The aim of this review is to depict and summarize the evidence regarding the different strategies that can be used in the clinical management of elderly HNSCC patients. Key references were derived from a PubMed query. Hand searching and clinicaltrials.gov were also used. This paper contains a narrative report and a critical discussion of clinical approaches in the context of elderly HNSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morena Fasano
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Ida D’Onofrio
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (I.D.); (C.G.)
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonio Angrisani
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Valentina Caliendo
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Carminia Maria Della Corte
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Mario Pirozzi
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Sergio Facchini
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Marianna Caterino
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Cesare Guida
- Unit of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale del Mare, ASL Napoli 1 Centro, 80147 Naples, Italy; (I.D.); (C.G.)
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0815-664-179
| | - Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Department of Precision Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Campania “L. Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy; (M.F.); (M.P.B.); (A.A.); (V.C.); (C.M.D.C.); (M.P.); (S.F.); (M.C.); (A.R.); (S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Omata J, Ueki Y, Takahashi T, Shodo R, Yamazaki K, Saijo K, Ota H, Togashi T, Sato Y, Horii A. Treatment Outcomes and the Safety of Chemoradiotherapy With High-Dose CDDP for Elderly Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Study. Front Surg 2021; 8:753049. [PMID: 34888343 PMCID: PMC8649661 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.753049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to compare the outcomes and safety of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between elderly and non-elderly patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). It is difficult to assess the causal effect of age because of possible differences in general conditions among individuals. Therefore, we adjusted the background factors of elderly and non-elderly patients using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: A total of 146 patients with HNSCC who received CRT were divided into an elderly (≥70 years, n = 35) and non-elderly group (<70 years, n = 111). Pre-treatment characteristics, including the performance status, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, primary site, and TNM stage were adjusted by PSM. We compared the outcomes and safety of CRT with high-dose single-agent cisplatin (CDDP) as well as outcomes following recurrence between the groups, before and after PSM. Results: The total dose of CDDP administered during CRT was significantly lower in the elderly group before PSM. However, it became comparable to the non-elderly group and adverse events did not differ between the groups following PSM, resulting in a comparable CRT completion rate. Overall-, disease specific-, and progression-free survivals of elderly patients were comparable to those of non-elderly patients following PSM. In contrast, elderly patients with recurrence could receive fewer salvage treatments than their non-elderly counterparts, resulting in worse survival. Conclusions: CRT with high-dose CDDP is safe and effective for the treatment of elderly patients with HNSCC. However, salvage treatments can be rarely conducted for elderly patients with a recurrence, considering a deterioration of their general condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jo Omata
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Yushi Ueki
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takahashi
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Ryusuke Shodo
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Keisuke Yamazaki
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Saijo
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Hisayuki Ota
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takafumi Togashi
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Sato
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Arata Horii
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Goshtasbi K, Birkenbeuel JL, Lehrich BM, Abiri A, Haidar YM, Tjoa T, Kuan EC. Association Between 5-Item Modified Frailty Index and Short-term Outcomes in Complex Head and Neck Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 166:482-489. [PMID: 33971756 DOI: 10.1177/01945998211010443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of preoperative frailty on short-term outcomes following complex head and neck surgeries (HNSs). STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional database analysis. SETTING American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. METHODS The 2005 to 2017 ACS-NSQIP was queried for patients undergoing complex HNS. Five-item modified frailty index (mFI) was calculated based on functional status and history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic hypertension. RESULTS A total of 2786 patients (73.1% male) with a mean age of 62.0 ± 11.6 years were included. Compared to nonfrail patients (41.2%), patients with mFI ≥1 (58.8%) had shorter length of operation (P = .021), longer length of stay (LOS) (P < .001), and higher rates of 30-day reoperation (P = .009), medical complications (P < .001), discharge to nonhome facility (DNHF) (P < .001), and mortality (P = .047). These parameters remained statistically significant when compared across all individual mFI scores (all P < .05). After adjusting for age, sex, race, body mass index, smoking, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score via multivariate logistic regression, patients with mFI ≥1 were significantly more likely to undergo reoperation (odds ratio [OR], 1.39), surgical complications (OR, 1.19), medical complications (OR, 1.55), prolonged LOS (OR, 1.29), and DNHF (OR, 1.56) (all P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression also demonstrated that after adjusting for confounders, compared to patients with mFI = 1, patients with mFI = 2-5 (18.7%) were more likely to undergo shorter operations (OR, 0.74), have medical (OR, 1.46) or any complications (OR, 1.27), and have DNHF (OR, 1.62) (all P < .05). CONCLUSION The 5-point mFI can independently predict short-term surgical outcomes following complex HNS. This simple and reliable metric can potentially lead to improved preoperative counseling and postoperative planning for complex HNS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khodayar Goshtasbi
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Jack L Birkenbeuel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Arash Abiri
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Yarah M Haidar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Tjoson Tjoa
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Use of the Geriatric-8 screening tool to predict prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer: A prospective, observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1039-1043. [PMID: 33757718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To clarify the usefulness of geriatric assessment screening tools for predicting prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL AND METHODS The geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool was administered to 78 older adults with HNC at their first visit to the hospital before any treatments. The ability of the G8 to predict survival was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and determining the cut-off value using Youden's Index. The G8 and other factors related to prognosis (age, performance status (PS), Charlson comorbidity index, number of oral medicines (polypharmacy), the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for biological nutrition status, and treatment intent (curative or palliative)) were validated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survival analysis was validated in a propensity score-weighting cohort to correct for confounding factors. Correlations between these factors and complications were examined using Fishers exact test. RESULTS The G8 cut-off value for overall survival was 10.5 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.82). In the propensity score-weighted cohort, on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the hazard ratio of an abnormal G8 (<11) was 3.70 [1.59-8.61 (p = 0.002)], and the hazard ratio of PS-abnormal (≥2) was 0.85 [0.09-7.60 (p = 0.88)]. Thirty-day mortality and all-complication rates were significantly higher in the G8-abnormal group. Neither major complications nor transfer to other institutions was correlated with an abnormal G8. CONCLUSION The G8 was a strong prognostic factor and a possible predictor of complications in older adults with HNC.
Collapse
|
25
|
Stromberger C, Yedikat B, Coordes A, Tinhofer I, Kalinauskaite G, Budach V, Zschaeck S, Raguse JD, Kofla G, Heiland M, Stsefanenka A, Beck-Broichsitter B, Dommerich S, Senger C, Beck M. Prognostic Factors Predict Oncological Outcome in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 10:566318. [PMID: 33708616 PMCID: PMC7942196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) represent a challenging group, as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative and palliative (chemo) radiation ([C]RT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in older patients. Methods This study included HNC patients aged ≥70 years who were treated with curative or palliative (C)RT. Clinicopathological data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS). Results A total of 271 patients (median age, 74 years) were enrolled. The majority had UICC stage III/IV (90%) and underwent curative treatment (85.2%). A total of 144 (53.1%) patients received definitive and 87 (32.1%) had adjuvant (C)RT. Overall, 40 patients (14.8%) received palliative (C)RT. Median follow-up duration (curative setting) was 87 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 57.8 and 35.9%, respectively. Median OS was significantly different for age ≤75 vs. >75 years, CCI <6 vs. ≥6, KPS ≥70 vs. <70%, Tx/T1/T2 vs. T3/T4, and adjuvant vs. definitive (C)RT, respectively. Age 70–75 years (p = 0.004), fewer comorbidities when CCI < 6 (p = 0.014), good KPS ≥ 70% (p = 0.001), and adjuvant (C)RT (p = 0.008) independently predicted longer survival. Palliative RT resulted in a median OS of 4 months. Conclusion Older age, lower KPS, higher CCI, and definitive (C)RT are indicators of worse survival in older patients with HNC treated curatively. Without a comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients aged >75 years, the KPS and CCI can be useful tools to account for “fitness, vulnerability or frailty” to help in treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Berna Yedikat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Dirk Raguse
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aksana Stsefanenka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fukuda N, Yunokawa M, Fujiwara Y, Wang X, Ohmoto A, Hayashi N, Urasaki T, Sato Y, Nakano K, Ono M, Tomomatsu J, Mitani H, Takahashi S. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2020; 4:e1322. [PMID: 33295110 PMCID: PMC8451378 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials. Aims The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. Methods and results Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression‐free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52‐1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43‐1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31‐0.89, P = .002). Conclusions The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Fukuda
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yu Fujiwara
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Xiaofei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Ohmoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naomi Hayashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Urasaki
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyoshi Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Nakano
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Makiko Ono
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Tomomatsu
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Mitani
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunji Takahashi
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
O'Donovan A, Leech M. Personalised treatment for older adults with cancer: The role of frailty assessment. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2020; 16:30-38. [PMID: 33102819 PMCID: PMC7568178 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It is widely accepted in clinical practice that chronological age is a poor predictor of treatment tolerance and outcomes in older adults with cancer. Intrinsic vulnerability is more a function of underlying frailty, rather than chronological age. Frailty is a state of increased vulnerability to stressors, such as cancer and its treatment, which can lead to adverse health outcomes for patients. Capturing this heterogeneity in reserve capacity is the cornerstone of management in geriatricmedicine, but remains poorly understood or adopted in radiation oncology. A two-step approach, using a shorter screening tool, followed by full assessment for those who need it, is the mostresourceful way of implementing frailty assessment in radiotherapy departments. It is important for radiation oncology professionals to identify frailty and to use this information in multidisciplinary decision making in order to develop a personalised radiotherapy approach for the older person. There are many ways we can effectively use this information, such as considering treatment fractionation schedules that would limit the burden of travel for those with social frailty, or reviewing the range of modalities at our disposal, which might limit toxicity in the older person at high risk of deterioration during treatment. Frailty assessment is not carried out in many radiotherapy departments presently, but there are many international models to use as exemplars as to how it may be implemented in clinical practice. There are many opportunities for further research and role development in this field at the current time.
Collapse
|
28
|
Chou WC, Chang PH, Chen PT, Wang HM, Yeh KY, Lu CH, Hung YS, Tung-Chieh Chang J, Tsang NM, Ho YW, Chen SY, Lee SH, Hung CY, Wang LJ, Liao KC, Lin CH, Tang WR, Lin YC. Clinical Significance of Vulnerability Assessment in Patients with Primary Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 108:602-611. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
29
|
Abstract
The number of older adults with cancer is growing in the United States, and there is a relative paucity of data relating the presence of frailty with its outcomes of interest. The authors present the surgical oncology, radiation oncology, and medical oncology literature with respect to the presence of frailty in older adults with cancer. More research is needed to understand how the presence of frailty should be used by surgical, radiation, and medical oncologists to guide patient counseling and treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina A Minami
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, Yawkey 1274, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| | - Zara Cooper
- Division of Trauma, Burn, and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Suite 2-016, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ørum M, Eriksen SV, Gregersen M, Jensen AR, Jensen K, Meldgaard P, Nordsmark M, Damsgaard EM. The impact of a tailored follow-up intervention on comprehensive geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer - a randomised controlled trial. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:41-48. [PMID: 32747208 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) can identify health problems in older persons. In addition, CGA includes intervention towards the identified problems. With follow up, more problems may be identified and the interventions can be adjusted. We wanted to compare CGA with or without tailored follow-up in a randomised design. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients 70+ years referred for oncology treatment with four primary tumour sites. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either control group with no follow-up or intervention group with a tailored follow-up by a multidisciplinary team. Primary outcome was adherence to cancer treatment. Secondary outcomes were daily life activities, physical performance and hospitalisation. RESULTS In total, 363 participants were randomised. After randomisation only 301 were planned to receive specific cancer treatment. Median age was 75 years. Among the 301 participants, 52% of control group vs. 61% of intervention group completed treatment. Risk Rate (RR): 1.16 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.95-1.42), p = .14. The impact varied between the included tumour-sites, p < .01. We found no difference in 90 days physical performance or daily life activities between groups. During the study period, 55% of controls vs. 47% in the intervention group were admitted to hospital, RR: 0.86 (95%CI: 0.69-1.07), p = .19. CONCLUSION In frail and vulnerable patients with cancer, a tailored follow-up on CGA showed no differences in ability to complete initially planned cancer treatment. The impact varied between the included tumour sites. We did not find any impact of tailored follow-up on daily life activities, physical performance or hospitalisation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Ørum
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University, Denmark; Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Peter Meldgaard
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University, Denmark; Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Marianne Nordsmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University, Denmark; Aarhus University, Denmark.
| | - Else Marie Damsgaard
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark; Aarhus University, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
D'Andréa G, Scheller B, Gal J, Chamorey E, Château Y, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Culié D, Koulmann PH, Hechema R, Demard F, Elaldi R, Bozec A. How to select candidates for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in the elderly? Predictive factors of postoperative outcomes. Surg Oncol 2020; 34:168-173. [PMID: 32891324 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The proportion of elderly patients with head and neck cancer is increasing. However, predictive factors of postoperative outcomes are insufficiently explored in this population. In this study, we aimed to determine predictive factors of postoperative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery in order to determine criteria on which patient selection could be based. METHODS All patients aged 65 years or over who underwent head and neck free-flap reconstructive surgery at our institution, between 2000 and 2016, were included in this retrospective study. Predictive factors of postoperative outcomes were investigated in uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Two-hundred patients were included in the study. Older age (>70, >75 or > 80 yrs) had no significant impact on postoperative outcomes. Free flap failure local and general complications rates were 11%, 34% and 43%, respectively. Oromandibular reconstruction (p = 0.04) was significantly associated with free flap failure and salvage surgery (p = 0.04) with local complications. A high comorbidity level (Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 4; p = 0.02) was associated with a higher risk of general complications. A G8 (Geriatric 8 questionnaire) score < 15 (p = 0.004), a high comorbidity level (Kaplan-Feinstein Index score ≥ 2; p = 0.04) and oromandibular reconstruction (p = 0.04) were associated with poor swallowing function at 6 months. CONCLUSION Head and neck free flap reconstruction should be offered to fit (G8 score ≥ 15) elderly patients without severe comorbidities (KFI < 2 or CCI < 4), particularly when oral/pharyngeal soft-tissue reconstruction is planned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grégoire D'Andréa
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Boris Scheller
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Yann Château
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Olivier Dassonville
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Gilles Poissonnet
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Dorian Culié
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Pierre-Henri Koulmann
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Raphaël Hechema
- Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, 33 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - François Demard
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Roxanne Elaldi
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France
| | - Alexandre Bozec
- Institut Universitaire de la Face et du Cou, 31 avenue de Valombrose, 06103, Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Taberna M, Gil Moncayo F, Jané-Salas E, Antonio M, Arribas L, Vilajosana E, Peralvez Torres E, Mesía R. The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) Approach and Quality of Care. Front Oncol 2020; 10:85. [PMID: 32266126 PMCID: PMC7100151 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 01/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The core function of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) is to bring together a group of healthcare professionals from different fields in order to determine patients' treatment plan. Most of head and neck cancer (HNC) units are currently led by MDTs that at least include ENT and maxillofacial surgeons, radiation and medical oncologists. HNC often compromise relevant structures of the upper aerodigestive tract involving functions such as speech, swallowing and breathing, among others. The impairment of these functions can significantly impact patients' quality of life and psychosocial status, and highlights the crucial role of specialized nurses, dietitians, psycho-oncologists, social workers, and onco-geriatricians, among others. Hence, these professionals should be integrated in HNC MDTs. In addition, involving translational research teams should also be considered, as it will help reducing the existing gap between basic research and the daily clinical practice. The aim of this comprehensive review is to assess the role of the different supportive disciplines integrated in an MDT and how they help providing a better care to HNC patients during diagnosis, treatment and follow up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miren Taberna
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), ONCOBELL, IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Gil Moncayo
- Psicooncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enric Jané-Salas
- Department of Odontostomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences (Dentistry), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,Oral Health and Masticatory System Group (Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute) IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maite Antonio
- Oncogeriatrics Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Arribas
- Clinical Nutrition Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Vilajosana
- Head and Neck Nurse, Head and Neck Functional Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabet Peralvez Torres
- Expert SLP in Oncologic Patients, Head of SLP's Department, Atos Medical Spain, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricard Mesía
- Medical Oncology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), B-ARGO, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shinde A, Vazquez J, Novak J, Sedrak MS, Amini A. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment in radiation oncology. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:194-196. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/21/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
34
|
van Walree IC, Scheepers E, van Huis-Tanja L, Emmelot-Vonk MH, Bellera C, Soubeyran P, Hamaker ME. A systematic review on the association of the G8 with geriatric assessment, prognosis and course of treatment in older patients with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2019; 10:847-858. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
35
|
Jelinek MJ, Howard AS, Haraf DJ, Vokes EE. Management of Early Head and Neck Cancer in Elderly Patients. J Oncol Pract 2019; 14:541-546. [PMID: 30285530 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) frequently affects elderly patients. Given the frailty and comorbid conditions of this population as well as the potential toxicities associated with treatment, there is a risk of undertreatment in older patients. However, there is growing evidence that benefit with standard treatment is similar in the elderly and in younger patients. Few prospective trials specifically target the elderly, which forces clinicians to rely on subgroup analyses and retrospective data. Therefore, adequate pretreatment assessments are vital to anticipate factors that may contribute to morbidity during therapy. In addition, supportive care during treatment is essential. For patients of all ages who present with early or localized disease, curative treatment should be offered whenever possible. With more precise surgical and radiologic techniques, the ability to provide curative treatment while minimizing long-term toxicity has greatly improved. Not only our techniques but also our understanding of the disease have improved. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related HNSCC has changed the treatment paradigm of advanced-stage disease because of the inherently better prognosis compared with tobacco- and alcohol-related HNSCC. How this will affect early-stage disease remains to be seen, but de-escalated therapy may prove a suitable strategy in eligible elderly patients. With improved therapies and understanding of the disease, additional prospective trials must be carried out in the elderly population.
Collapse
|
36
|
Rubin SJ, Wu KY, Kirke DN, Ezzat WH, Truong MT, Salama AR, Jalisi S. Head and Neck Cancer Complications in the Geriatric Population Based on Hospital Case Volume. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2019; 100:NP62-NP68. [PMID: 31170822 DOI: 10.1177/0145561319856006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine whether surgical case volume is a predictive factor of surgical outcomes when managing geriatric patients with head andneck cancer. METHODS A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were obtainedfrom the Vizient Database, which included a total of 93 academicinstitutions. Men and women aged between 65 and 100 years undergoing head and neck cancer surgery during 2009 and 2012,excluding cases of thyroid cancer and skin cancer of the head and neck(n = 4544) were included in the study. Hospital case volume was definedas low (≤21 cases/year), moderate (22-49 cases/year), or high (≥50 cases/year). The frequency of comorbidities and complications wasmeasured by hospital case volume using a χ2 test. Significancewas determined with an α level of .05. RESULTS The largest number of head and neck cancer cases involving comorbidities (90.54%) and the highest rate of overall complications(27.50%) occurred in moderate case volume institutions compared to athe complication rate of 22.89% in low volume hospitals and 21.50% in highvolume hospitals (P < .0001). The most common comorbidities across all3 hospital case volumes included hypertension, metastatic cancer,and chronic pulmonary disease and the most common complicationsincluded hemorrhage/hematoma and postoperative pulmonarycompromise. CONCLUSION With more geriatric patients requiring surgery for head andneck cancer, it would be beneficial to manage the more complex cases at high volume centers and to develop multidisciplinary teams to optimizecase management and minimize complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Rubin
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Y Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Diana N Kirke
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 5944Mount Sinai Health System, New York, NY, USA
| | - Waleed H Ezzat
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Minh Tam Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew R Salama
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Scharukh Jalisi
- Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 1859Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Belgioia L, Bacigalupo A, Missale F, Vecchio S, Chiola I, Callegari S, Verzanini E, Peretti G, Corvò R. Individualized treatment of head neck squamous cell carcinoma patients aged 70 or older with radiotherapy alone or associated to cisplatin or cetuximab: impact of weekly radiation dose on loco-regional control. Med Oncol 2019; 36:42. [PMID: 30927146 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-019-1264-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate if, in elderly HNC patients, loco-regional control (LRC) is influenced by average weekly radiation dose (AWD). From 2009 to 2017, 150 consecutive HNC elderly patients were analyzed. AWD was calculated by dividing total dose in Gray by overall treatment time in weeks. Patients were divided in 2 groups: Group 1 (70-75 years) and Group 2 (> 75 years). Primary endpoint was LRC; secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and compliance to treatment. The median age was 76 years (range 70-92), the distribution of patients by age was 72 and 78 patients in Group 1 and in Group 2, respectively; overall median follow-up was 23 months. Optimal cut-off of AWD for LRC was 9.236 (p = 0.018). Median OS was 73 months. In univariate survival analysis low PS (p = 0.005), T3-T4 (p = 0.021), Stage III-IV (p = 0.046) and AWDLow (< 9.236) (p = 0.018) were significantly associated with lower LRC; low PS (p < 0.001) and Group 2 (p = 0.006) were also associated with lower OS. Considering patients treated with radiotherapy alone AWDLow was significantly associated with lower LRC (p = 0.04) whereas among patient treated with chemoradiotherapy AWD did not affected LRC (p = 0.18). The multivariate analysis confirmed the significant value of PS for the prediction of LRC and OS (p = 0.035 and p < 0.001, respectively). In elderly patients an AWD of > 9.236 Gy was found to be beneficial for RT alone regimen. When radiotherapy alone is indicated in elderly patients an effort should be made to maintain an increased AWD in order to improve LRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liliana Belgioia
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy. .,Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Almalina Bacigalupo
- Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Missale
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefania Vecchio
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilaria Chiola
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Serena Callegari
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Elisa Verzanini
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Coca‐Pelaz A, Halmos GB, Strojan P, Bree R, Bossi P, Bradford CR, Rinaldo A, Vander Poorten V, Sanabria A, Takes RP, Ferlito A. The role of age in treatment‐related adverse events in patients with head and neck cancer: A systematic review. Head Neck 2019; 41:2410-2429. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.25696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2018] [Revised: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Coca‐Pelaz
- Department of OtolaryngologyHospital Universitario Central de Asturias Oviedo Spain
| | - Gyorgy B. Halmos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation OncologyInstitute of Oncology Ljubljana Slovenia
| | - Remco Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer CenterUniversity Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical SpecialtiesRadiological Sciencesand Public HealthUniversity of Brescia, ASST‐Spedali Civili Brescia Italy
| | - Carol R. Bradford
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | - Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck OncologyUniversity Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven Leuven Belgium
| | - Alvaro Sanabria
- Department of Surgery, School of MedicineUniversidad de Antioquia, Clínica Vida Medellín Colombia
| | - Robert P. Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryRadboud University Medical Center Nijmegen The Netherlands
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group Padua Italy
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Role of Frailty and Comorbidity in Determination of Operability for Patients With Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40136-019-00225-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
40
|
Malik A, Mishra A, Chopda P, Singhvi H, Nair S, Nair D, Laskar SG, Prabhash K, Agarwal JP, Chaturvedi P. Impact of age on elderly patients with oral cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 276:223-231. [PMID: 30402794 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5191-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In this study we have tried to analyze the impact of age on various clinico-pathological parameters, treatment completion and subsequent survival in older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 140 elderly (> 65 years) patients of oral cancer operated between January 2012 and December 2013. The patients were divided into two groups based upon their age that ≤ 70 years and > 70 years.Association of distribution of various clinico-pathological factors between different groups was assessed by using Chi-square test. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan Meir analysis. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. RESULTS The two groups had similar distribution of various clinico-pathological factors. Disease free survival for the group ≤ 70 and > 70 years was 37.6 months and 36.4 months (p < 0.594). 13.5% and 7.8% patients > 70 years and ≤ 70 years were either advised or received sub-optimal adjuvant therapy (p < 0.002). CONCLUSION There is no difference distribution of various clinico-pathological factors and survival in patients of oral cancer ≤ 70 and > 70 years of age. Age did not affect survival. Majority of patients could complete the adjuvant therapy advised. Still, significantly more number of patients > 70 years could not receive/complete appropriate adjuvant therapy. Thus treatment needs to be tailored keeping in mind the individual's performance status and the co-morbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshat Malik
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Aseem Mishra
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Prashant Chopda
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Hitesh Singhvi
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Sudhir Nair
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Deepa Nair
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Kumar Prabhash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | | | - Pankaj Chaturvedi
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Szumacher E, Sattar S, Neve M, Do K, Ayala A, Gray M, Lee J, Alibhai S, Puts M. Use of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and Geriatric Screening for Older Adults in the Radiation Oncology Setting: A Systematic Review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:578-588. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
42
|
Iqbal MS, Dua D, Kelly C, Bossi P. Managing older patients with head and neck cancer: The non-surgical curative approach. J Geriatr Oncol 2018; 9:411-417. [PMID: 29685382 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2017] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Managing older patients with head and neck cancers poses a challenge due to the often reduced levels of physiological reserve, the frequent comorbidities and treatment related toxicity. These factors have implications on speech, breathing and swallowing functions. Treatment management plans in these patients may result in de-intensification strategies and as a result of this, use of non-standard treatments is increasing. There have been published reports that indicate the addition of concurrent systemic therapy to radiation in selected older patients is feasible, and produces outcomes comparable with younger patients. However, some other studies including meta-analyses suggest a lack of real survival benefit with the addition of chemotherapy. So, the key point appears to be the optimal patient selection. Appropriate geriatric and frailty assessments are required to help determine the optimal treatment for older patients with head and neck cancer. Treatment for this population still needs to be well defined and optimized in both modality and intensity. Qualitative studies are also required to address short and long-term post-treatment quality-of-life and survivorship issues in this specific patient population. This review summarizes the evidence available regarding the non-surgical management of older patients with head and neck cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Shahid Iqbal
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
| | - Divyanshu Dua
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Canberra Hospital, Garran ACT 2605, Australia
| | - Charles Kelly
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Northern Centre for Cancer Care, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Instituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Head and Neck Cancer in the Elderly: Frailty, Shared Decisions, and Avoidance of Low Value Care. Clin Geriatr Med 2018; 34:233-244. [PMID: 29661335 DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2018.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a disease of older adults. Recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma portends a poor prognosis, with median overall survival of less than 12 months. Within this vulnerable population, significant treatment-related toxicities and physical and psychosocial sequelae can be devastating to quality of life at the end of life. Shared decision making and early comprehensive palliative and support services are at the crux of the approach to older adults with HNC. In doing so, low-value care that fails to meet the goals of patients and their caregivers at the end-of-life may be avoided.
Collapse
|
44
|
Chemoradiotherapy as Definitive Treatment for Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:3508795. [PMID: 29581971 PMCID: PMC5822813 DOI: 10.1155/2018/3508795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Accepted: 12/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background With the aging population and a rising incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), there is an emerging need for developing strategies to treat elderly patients. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 158 patients treated with definitive, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for SCCHN. Clinicopathological characteristics, acute toxicities, and oncological outcomes were compared between patients younger and older than (or of age equal to) 65, 70, and 75 years. Results RT dose, chemotherapy regimen, and total chemotherapy dose were balanced between the groups. After a median follow-up of 29 months, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control rate, and distant metastasis-free survival stratified by age of ≥65, ≥70, or ≥75 years revealed no differences. The rate of acute toxicities was also not higher for older patients. Worse ECOG performance score (ECOG 2-3) was associated with impaired OS (p = 0.004) and PFS (p = 0.048). Conclusion Definitive treatment with CRT for SCCHN is feasible and effective; even in advanced age treatment decisions should be made according to general condition and comorbidity, rather than calendar age alone.
Collapse
|
45
|
Droz JP, Boyle H, Albrand G, Mottet N, Puts M. Role of Geriatric Oncologists in Optimizing Care of Urological Oncology Patients. Eur Urol Focus 2017; 3:385-394. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
46
|
Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, de Glas NA, Hsu T, Kanesvaran R, Steer C, Navarrete-Reyes AP, Battisti NML, Chavarri-Guerra Y, O’Donovan A, Avila-Funes JA, Hurria A. Global geriatric oncology: Achievements and challenges. J Geriatr Oncol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
47
|
Maggiore R, Zumsteg ZS, BrintzenhofeSzoc K, Trevino KM, Gajra A, Korc-Grodzicki B, Epstein JB, Bond SM, Parker I, Kish JA, Murphy BA, VanderWalde NA. The Older Adult With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Knowledge Gaps and Future Direction in Assessment and Treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:868-883. [PMID: 28602414 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2016] [Revised: 01/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) pose unique treatment and supportive care challenges to oncologists and other cancer care providers. The majority of patients with HNSCC present with locoregionally advanced disease, for which combined-modality treatment integrating chemotherapy and radiation therapy is often necessary to maximize tumor control. However, applying these approaches to an older population with concomitant comorbidities and a higher risk of functional impairments remains challenging and is exacerbated by the paucity of studies involving older adults. The purpose of this article is to identify knowledge gaps in the evaluation and management of older adults with HNSCC-particularly those undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy-and their caregivers through a review of the literature conducted by clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates. The findings highlight the importance of a geriatric assessment and the therapeutic paradigms and challenges relevant to this population. Furthermore, we identify the need for additional research and interventions related to key supportive care issues that arise during and after treatment in older adults with locoregionally advanced HNSCC. On the basis of our findings, we prioritize these issues to guide future patient-oriented research endeavors to address these knowledge gaps and thus better serve this growing patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald Maggiore
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Zachary S Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | - Kelly M Trevino
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ajeet Gajra
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University Cancer Center, Syracuse, New York
| | | | - Joel B Epstein
- Department of Oral Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Stewart M Bond
- Boston College William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts
| | - Ira Parker
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California
| | - Julie A Kish
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Barbara A Murphy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Noam A VanderWalde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center-West Cancer Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
O'Donovan A, Leech M, Gillham C. Assessment and management of radiotherapy induced toxicity in older patients. J Geriatr Oncol 2017; 8:421-427. [PMID: 28739158 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Revised: 05/19/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an attractive treatment option for older adults, especially where surgery and chemotherapy pose too great a risk. Radiotherapy toxicity may be divided into acute/early and late effects of treatment. The latter may have limited relevance to an older patient with competing causes of mortality due to significant comorbidity. Altered fractionation regimes have been employed in numerous sites, with no significant toxicity impact. These offer greater convenience in the elderly, especially those with limited social support or in active caregiving roles. As radiotherapy toxicity is site specific, it's important to assess baseline function via Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), and any pre-existing comorbidities that may influence toxicity. With modern radiotherapy technology and capabilities, these are less of an issue and radiotherapy is a very suitable treatment option for the older adult. When evaluating the literature on toxicity in older patients, it's important to recognise that older studies do not represent modern day radiotherapy techniques and capabilities. Advanced technology may simultaneously deliver enhanced target coverage and reduced toxicity. More research is required related to the predictive power of CGA in linking radiotherapy toxicity to frailty. What little evidence exists shows that CGA has a role in treatment of older patients with radiotherapy and that, in general, radiotherapy appears to be well tolerated in older adults. The purpose of this review is to provide a broad overview of the mechanisms of normal tissue reactions to radiotherapy and how radiation induced toxicity may affect older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita O'Donovan
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Michelle Leech
- Applied Radiation Therapy Trinity (ARTT), School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Charles Gillham
- Saint Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Highfield Rd., Rathgar, Dublin 6, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Middelburg JG, Mast ME, de Kroon M, Jobsen JJ, Rozema T, Maas H, Baartman EA, Geijsen D, van der Leest AH, van den Bongard DJ, van Loon J, Budiharto T, Coebergh JW, Aarts MJ, Struikmans H. Timed Get Up and Go Test and Geriatric 8 Scores and the Association With (Chemo-)Radiation Therapy Noncompliance and Acute Toxicity in Elderly Cancer Patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:843-849. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.01.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Revised: 01/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
50
|
Porceddu SV, Haddad RI. Management of elderly patients with locoregionally confined head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol 2017; 18:e274-e283. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30229-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2016] [Revised: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|