Streamlining radioembolization in UNOS T1/T2 hepatocellular carcinoma by eliminating lung shunt estimation

Single-Session Ablative Transarterial Radioembolization for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Streamline Care: An Initial Experience

PURPOSE

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is performed after a mapping angiogram involving infusion of radiolabeled macroaggregated albumin to assess for non-target embolization and pulmonary shunting. The purpose of this case series was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of single-session TARE without the initial procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-institution case series of 16 consecutive procedures on 15 patients with 18 tumors who underwent an attempted single-session TARE procedures with glass microspheres are presented. A lung shunt fraction (LSF) of 5% was assumed for planning purposes.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent (10/15) of patients were male with a median age of 72 years. Median tumor size was 2.5 cm (IQR 2.0-3.2 cm). Sixteen of the 18 targeted tumors were untreated prior to the single-session TARE. Rate of technical success was 88% (14/16). Two patients did not ultimately receive a single-session TARE due to intraprocedural findings. The mean administered activity was 2.0 GBq, and the mean MIRD dose was 464 Gy based on pre-treatment anatomic imaging and 800 Gy based on cone-beam CT. There were no cases of radiation pneumonitis. Mean post-procedural calculated lung dose was 4.9 Gy (range 3.1-9.3) based on SPECT.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial experience with single-session TARE using Y-90 glass microspheres without pre-procedural mapping angiography and lung shunt estimation demonstrates that it is a feasible and safe treatment option for select patients with small (< 5 cm) HCC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

Level 4 case series.

Translating contrast enhanced computed tomography images to liver radioembolization dose distribution for more comprehensively indicating patients

Objective.Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used in the pre-treatment evaluation of liver Y-90 radioembolization feasibility. CECT provides detailed imaging of the liver and surrounding structures, allowing healthcare providers to assess the size, location, and characteristics of liver tumors prior to the treatment. Here we propose a method for translating CECT images to an expected dose distribution for tumor(s) and normal liver tissue.Approach.A pre-procedure CECT is used to obtain an iodine arterial-phase distribution by subtracting the non-contrast CT from the late arterial phase. The liver segments surrounding the targeted tumor are selected using Couinaud's method. The resolution of the resulting images is then degraded to match the resolution of the positron emission tomography (PET) images, which can image the Y-90 activity distribution post-treatment. The resulting images are then used in the same way as PET images to compute doses using the local deposition method. CECT images from three patients were used to test this method retrospectively and were compared with Y-90 PET-based dose distributions through dose volume histograms.Main results.Results show a concordance between predicted and delivered Y-90 dose distributions with less than 10% difference in terms of mean dose, for doses greater than 10% of the 98th percentile (D2%).Significance.CECT-derived predictions of Y-90 radioembolization dose distributions seem promising as a supplementary tool for physicians when assessing treatment feasibility. This dosimetry prediction method could provide a more comprehensive pre-treatment evaluation-offering greater insights than a basic assessment of tumor opacification on CT images.

Radiation Segmentectomy for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Practical Review of Evidence

Radiation segmentectomy is a versatile, safe, and effective ablative therapy for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Advances in radiation segmentectomy patient selection, procedural technique, and dosimetry have positioned this modality as a curative-intent and guideline-supported treatment for patients with solitary HCC. This review describes key radiation segmentectomy concepts and summarizes the existing literary knowledgebase.

Measurement of the Tumor-to-Normal Ratio for Radioembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective Study Comparing 2-Dimensional Perfusion Angiography, Technetium-99m Macroaggregated Albumin, and Yttrium-90 SPECT/CT

PURPOSE

To calculate the preradioembolic tumor-to-normal (T:N) ratio in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using 2-dimensional (2D) perfusion angiography and compare it with that calculated using technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (99mTc MAA) single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective single-arm study enrolled 15 participants with HCC who underwent 2D perfusion angiography immediately before the enrollment and with the microcatheter located at the same location as 99mTc MAA injection, after which SPECT/CT was performed. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography was used to calculate the area under the curve for the tumor and normal hepatic parenchyma and subsequently calculate the T:N ratio. The T:N ratio was calculated from the 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT and post-yttrium-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT using dosimetry software.

RESULTS

The mean participant age was 64.1 years ± 9.8, and the study included 14 (93%) men and 1 (7%) woman. The mean tumor size was 4.1 cm (SD ± 2.4), and all participants received segmental treatments with glass microspheres. The mean T:N ratio calculated by 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT was 2.28 (SD ± 0.89) vs 2.25 (SD ± 0.99) calculated by 2D perfusion angiography (P = .45). For the 13 participants who underwent selective internal radiation therapy (transarterial radioembolization), there was no significant difference between the T:N ratios calculated by 2D perfusion angiography and post-90Y SPECT/CT (2.25 [SD ± 1.05] vs 1.91 [SD ± 0.39]; P = .12).

CONCLUSIONS

The T:N ratio calculated by 2D perfusion angiography correlated well with that calculated by 99mTc MAA SPECT/CT.

CT texture features and lung shunt fraction measured using 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT before trans-arterial radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma patients

The aim of this study is to determine whether contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)-based texture parameters can predict high (> 30 Gy) expected lung dose (ELD) calculated using 99mTc macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for pre-trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE) dosimetry. 35 patients were analyzed, with a treatable planned dose of ≥ 200 Gy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Lung shunt fraction (LSF) was obtained from planar and SPECT/CT scans. Texture features of the tumor lesion on CECT before TARE were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to determine potential ELD > 30 Gy predictors. Among the 35 patients, nine (25.7%) had ELD > 30 Gy, and had a higher LSF than the ELD ≤ 30 Gy group using the planar (20.7 ± 8.0% vs. 6.3 ± 3.3%; P < 0.001) and SPECT/CT (12.4 ± 5.1% vs. 3.5 ± 2.0%; P < 0.001) scans. The tumor integral total (HU × L) value was a predictor for high LSF using SPECT/CT, with an area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.983 (95% confidence interval: 0.869-1.000, P < 0.001), 100%, and 88.5%, respectively. The tumor integral total value is an imaging marker for predicting ELD > 30 Gy. Applying CECT texture analysis may assist in reducing time and cost in patient selection and modifying TARE treatment plans.

Early-Stage HCC Percutaneous Locoregional Management: East versus West Perspectives

Hepatocellular carcinoma represents an important cause of death worldwide. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients not suitable for surgery can be treated with a variety of minimally invasive locoregional interventional oncology techniques. Various guidelines in different countries address the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, but the actual treatment is usually discussed by a multidisciplinary tumor board in a personalized manner, leading to potential treatment differences based on Western and Eastern perspectives. The aim of this paper is to integrate literature evidence with the eminent experiences collected during a focused session at the Mediterranean Interventional Oncology (MIO) Live Congress 2023.

The Role of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) in Treating Portal Hypertension in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver cancer is very frequent, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for the majority of liver cancer cases. Its growing incidence has been greatly affected by the increasing prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). The latter is a new epidemic in our era. In fact, HCC is often generated from noncirrhotic liver and its treatment benefits from surgical and nonsurgical approaches, potentially bridged by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) use. TIPS use is an effective treatment for portal hypertension complications, but its application in patients with HCC and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) remains controversial due to concerns about tumor rupture, dissemination, and increased toxicity. The technical feasibility and safety of TIPS use in HCC patients have been evaluated in several studies. Despite concerns about intraprocedural complications, retrospective studies have shown high success rates and low complication rates in TIPS placement for HCC patients. TIPS use in combination with locoregional treatments, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or transarterial radioembolization (TARE), has been explored as a treatment option for HCC patients with portal hypertension. These studies have shown improved survival rates in patients undergoing TIPS in combination with locoregional treatments. However, the efficacy and toxicity of TACE in combination with TIPS use require careful evaluation, as changes in venous and arterial flow can affect treatment outcomes and complications. The results from studies evaluating the impact of TIPS on systemic therapy and surgical options are also promising. In conclusion, the TIPS is a sufficiently safe, useful item available for physicians treating complications of portal hypertension. Moreover, a TIPS can be used in combination with locoregional therapy in HCC patients. Systemic chemotherapy can also benefit of the use of TIPS placement. A complex interplay affects TIPS use with surgery. The latter needs further data. The TIPS is a useful and safe add-on treatment, changing the natural course of HCC progression. Its use is regulated by a sophisticated physiologic and pathophysiologic flow of evidence.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Lung shunt fraction calculations before Y-90 transarterial radioembolization: Comparison of accuracy and clinical significance of planar scintigraphy and SPECT/CT

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy and clinical significance of planar scintigraphy lung shunt fraction (PLSF) and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) computed tomography (CT) lung shunt fraction (SLSF) before Y-90 transarterial radioembolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients (46 men, 24 women; mean age, 64 ± 9.5 [SD] years) who underwent 83 treatments with Y-90 transarterial radioembolization for primary or secondary malignancies of the liver with a PLSF ≥ 7.5% were retrospectively evaluated. The patients mapping technetium 99 m (Tc-99 m) macroaggregated albumin (MAA) PLSF and SLSF were calculated and compared to the post Y-90 delivery SLSF. A model using modern dose thresholds was created to identify patients who would require dose reduction due to a lung dose ≥ 30 Gy, with patients who required >50% dose reduction considered to be delivery cancelations.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between mean PLSF (14.7 ± 11.6 [SD]%; range: 7.5-84.1%) and mean SLSF (8.7 ± 8.5 [SD]%; range: 1.7-73.5) (P < 0.001). The mean realized LSF (7.1 ± 3 [SD]%; range:1.5-17.6) was significantly less than the PLSF (P <0.001) but not the SLSF (P = 0.07). PLSF significantly overestimated the realized LSF by more than the SLSF (8.5 ± 5.3 [SD] % [range: -0.1-21.7] vs. 0.8 ± 3.6 [SD] % [range: -5-13.2], respectively) (P < 0.001). Based on the clinical significance model, 20 patients (20/83, 24.1%) would have required dose reduction or cancelation when using PLSF but would not require even a dose reduction when using the SLSF. Significantly more deliveries would have been be canceled if PLSF was used as compared to SLSF (22/83 [26.5%] vs. 6/83 [7.2%], respectively) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

SLSF is significantly more accurate at predicting realized LSF than PLSF and this difference is of clinical significance in a number of patients with a PLSF ≥ 7.5%.

Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group

PURPOSE

In light of recently published clinical reports and trials, the TheraSphere Global Dosimetry Steering Committee (DSC) reconvened to review new data and to update previously published clinical and dosimetric recommendations for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

The TheraSphere Global DSC is comprised of health care providers across multiple disciplines involved in the treatment of HCC with yttrium-90 (Y-90) glass microsphere-based transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Literature published between January 2019 and September 2021 was reviewed, discussed, and adjudicated by the Delphi method. Recommendations included in this updated document incorporate both the results of the literature review and the expert opinion and experience of members of the committee.

RESULTS

Committee discussion and consensus led to the expansion of recommendations to apply to five common clinical scenarios in patients with HCC to support more individualized efficacious treatment with Y-90 glass microspheres. Existing clinical scenarios were updated to reflect recent developments in dosimetry approaches and broader treatment paradigms evolving for patients presenting with HCC.

CONCLUSION

Updated consensus recommendations are provided to guide clinical and dosimetric approaches for the use of Y-90 glass microsphere TARE in HCC, accounting for disease presentation, tumor biology, and treatment intent.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Role of interventional oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma: Future best practice beyond current guidelines

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Liver transplant remains the goal of curative treatment, but limited supply of organs decreases accessibility and prolongs waiting time to transplantation. Therefore, interventional oncology therapies have been used to treat the majority of HCC patients, including those awaiting transplant. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification is the most widely used staging system in management of HCC that helps allocate treatments. Since its inception in 1999, it was updated for the fifth time in November 2021 and for the first time shaped by expert opinions outside the core BCLC group. The most recent version includes additional options for early-stage disease, substratifies intermediate disease into three groups, and lists alternates to Sorafenib that can double the expected survival of advanced-stage disease. The group also proposed a new BCLC staging schema for disease progression, and endorsed treatment stage migration (TSM) directly into the main staging and treatment algorithm. This article reviews the recent developments underlying the current BCLC guidelines and highlights ongoing research, particularly involving radioembolization, that will shape future best practice.

Paradigm shift in the treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent worldwide with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. The advancement of therapeutic options and the development of new systemic therapies expand the armamentarium to tackle HCC. Treatment options should be provided based on the hierarchy of efficacy in a multidisciplinary perspective, instead of the traditional stage-guided scheme. In advanced HCC, lenvatinib has a comparable efficacy as sorafenib for the first-line therapy of HCC; while regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab have been approved as second-line therapy after the failure of sorafenib. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy prolongs response rate and survival and enables long-term cure. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is superior to sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Several emerging regimens by the combination of various systemic therapies are currently under clinical trials. Systemic therapy may be used in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or even as initial therapy for intermediate-stage HCC. The paradigm shift of HCC treatment will improve patient outcomes.

TARE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Right to the Left of BCLC

The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system is the most commonly used staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Western countries. BCLC aims to categorize patients into five stages with different prognoses and to allocate treatment according to these stages based on the best possible contemporary evidence. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has recently entered at the left of the BCLC algorithm (i.e., BCLC 0-A), mainly because of negative phase III trials in BCLC C stage. TARE has shown a steady increase in nationwide studies over the past 20 years and has even been adopted in some tertiary centers as the primary HCC treatment across all BCLC stages. We aimed to review the history of TARE in HCC, starting from advanced HCC and gradually expanding to earlier stages at the left of the BCLC system.

Contemporary Algorithm for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2021: The Northwestern Approach

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality around the world. Frequently, concurrent liver dysfunction and variations in tumor burden make it difficult to design effective and standardized treatment pathways. Contemporary treatment guidelines designed for an era of personalized medicine should consider these features in a more clinically meaningful way to improve outcomes for patients across the HCC spectrum. Given the heterogeneity of HCC, we propose a detailed clinical algorithm for selecting optimal treatment using an evidence-based and practical approach, incorporating liver function, tumor burden, the extent of disease, and ultimate treatment intent, with the goal of individualizing clinical decision making.

Management of Liver Tumors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Added Value of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy (SIRT)

Background: In the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, liver-directed therapies (LDTs) may offer minimally invasive integrative tools for tumor control. Among them, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) represents a safe, flexible and effective treatment. Purpose of this study is to present our experience with SIRT during the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic and provide an overview of the indications and challenges of SIRT in this scenario. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the number of patients evaluated by Multidisciplinary Liver Tumor Board (MLTB) and who were undergoing LDTs between March and July 2020 and compared it with 2019. For patients treated with SIRT, clinical data, treatment details and the best radiological response were collected. Results: Compared to 2019, we observed a 27.5% reduction in the number of patients referred to MLTB and a 28.3% decrease in percutaneous ablations; transarterial chemoembolizations were stable, while SIRT increased by 64%. The majority of SIRT patients (75%) had primary tumors, mostly HCC. The best objective response and disease control rates were 56.7% and 72.2%, respectively. Conclusion: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic was characterized by an increased demand for SIRT, which represents a safe, flexible and effective treatment, whose manageability will further improve by simplifying the treatment workflow, developing user-friendly and reliable tools for personalized dosimetry and improving interdisciplinary communication.

Surveillance and Monitoring of Hepatocellular Carcinoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is expected to have a long-lasting impact on the approach to care for patients at risk for and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) due to the risks from potential exposure and resource reallocation. The goal of this document is to provide recommendations on HCC surveillance and monitoring, including strategies to limit unnecessary exposure while continuing to provide high-quality care for patients. Publications and guidelines pertaining to the management of HCC during COVID-19 were reviewed for recommendations related to surveillance and monitoring practices, and any available guidance was referenced to support the authors' recommendations when applicable. Existing HCC risk stratification models should be utilized to prioritize imaging resources to those patients at highest risk of incident HCC and recurrence following therapy though surveillance can likely continue as before in settings where COVID-19 prevalence is low and adequate protections are in place. Waitlisted patients who will benefit from urgent LT should be prioritized for surveillance whereas it would be reasonable to extend surveillance interval by a short period in HCC patients with lower risk tumor features and those more than 2 years since their last treatment. For patients eligible for systemic therapy, the treatment regimen should be dictated by the risk of COVID-19 associated with route of administration, monitoring and treatment of adverse events, within the context of relative treatment efficacy.

Frontiers of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma continues to increase worldwide. Fortunately, there have been notable recent advances in locoregional and systemic therapy. In this current review, we will highlight these new developments and future directions of hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and address the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment.

Lung Shunt Reduction for Yttrium-90 Radioembolization: Chemoembolization Versus Radioembolization

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy of chemoembolization versus radioembolization in reducing lung shunt fraction (LSF) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, from March 2012 to January 2021, 457 patients with HCC underwent planning angiography and ^99mTc-macroaggregated albumin imaging for possible yttrium-90 radioembolization. Ten patients underwent radioembolization, and seven patients underwent conventional chemoembolization for LSF reduction, and a second ^99mTc-macroaggregated albumin imaging was obtained approximately 1 month later. LSF under both procedures was compared with the Mann-Whitney U-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

In the radioembolization group, the mean first and second LSF were 13.0±6.9% and 20.9±9.6%, respectively (p=0.059); after radioembolization, LSF was lower in three patients but higher in seven patients. In the chemoembolization group, the mean first and second LSF were 26.1±17.3% and 8.7±5.5%, respectively (p=0.018); after chemoembolization, LSF was reduced in all seven patients.

CONCLUSION

Chemoembolization appears to be more effective in reducing LSF within 1 month compared with radioembolization.

Same day yttrium-90 radioembolization with single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography: An opportunity to improve care during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made it more challenging for patients to undergo yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization (RE). Same day Y-90 RE provides an opportunity to minimize logistical challenges and infection risk associated with COVID-19, thus improving patient access.

AIM

To describe the use of same day Y-90 RE with routine single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in order to optimize therapy.

METHODS

All patients were selected for Y-90 RE through a multidisciplinary tumor board, and were screened and tested for COVID-19 infection per institutional protocol. A same day procedure was developed, consisting of angiography, imaging, and Y-90 resin particle delivery. Routine SPECT/CT after technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (Tc-99m MAA) administration was performed for assessment of arterial supply, personalized dosimetry, and extrahepatic activity. Post-treatment Y-90 bremsstrahlung SPECT/CT was performed for confirmation of particle delivery, by utilization of energy windowing to limit signal from previously administered Tc-99m MAA particles.

RESULTS

A total of 14 patients underwent same day Y-90 RE between March and June 2020. Mean lung shunt fraction was 6.13% (range 3.5%-13.1%). Y-90 RE was performed for a single lesion in 7 patients, while the remaining 7 patients had treatment of multifocal lesions. The largest lesion measured 8.3 cm. All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged the same day.

CONCLUSION

Same day Y-90 RE with resin-based microspheres is feasible, and provides an opportunity to mitigate infection risk and logistical challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. We recommend consideration of SPECT/CT, especially among patients with complex malignancies, for the potential to improve outcomes and eligibility of patients to undergo same day Y-90 RE.

Repeat Evaluation of Lung Shunt Fraction is Unnecessary: A Retrospective Observational Study of Successive Lung Shunt Fractions from Variable Arterial Distributions in Patients Undergoing Radioembolization of Primary and Secondary Liver Tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether the recalculation of lung shunt fraction (LSF) is necessary prior to next-stage or same lobe repeat radioembolization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent radioembolization between February 2008 and December 2018. Eighty of 312 patients had repeat mapping angiograms and LSF calculations. A total of 160 LSF calculations were made using planar imaging (155, [97%]) and single-photon emission computed tomography (5 [3%]) technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin hepatic arterial injection imaging. The mean patient age was 61.8 years ± 12.7; 69 (86%) patients had metastatic disease and 11 (14%) had hepatocellular carcinoma.

RESULTS

Patients had a median LSF of 5% (interquartile range [IQR] 3%-9%) with a median absolute difference of 1.25 (IQR 0.65-3.4) and a median of 76 days (IQR 42.5-120 days) between repeat LSF calculations. There was a median change in LSF of 0.2% between mapping studies (P = .11). There was no statistical significance between the repeat LSFs regardless of the arterial distribution (P = .79) or between tumor types (P = .75). No patients exceeded lung dose limits using actual or predicted prescribed dose amounts. The actual median lung dose was 2.6 Gy (IQR 1.8-4.4 Gy, maximum = 20.5) for the first radioembolization and 2.0 Gy (IQR 1.3-3.7 Gy, maximum = 10.1) for the second radioembolization.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference in LSF was identified between different time points and arterial distributions within the same patient undergoing repeat radioembolization. In patients who receive well under 30-Gy lung dose for the initial treatment and a 50-Gy cumulative lung dose, repeat radioembolization treatments in the same patient may not require a repeat LSF calculation.

Management of primary hepatic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations for risk mitigation from a multidisciplinary perspective

Around the world, recommendations for cancer treatment are being adapted in real time in response to the pandemic of COVID-19. We, as a multidisciplinary team, reviewed the standard management options, according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system, for hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose treatment recommendations related to COVID-19 for the different stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (ie, 0, A, B, and C), specifically in relation to surgery, locoregional therapies, and systemic therapy. We suggest potential strategies to modify risk during the pandemic and aid multidisciplinary treatment decision making. We also review the multidisciplinary management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as a potentially curable and incurable diagnosis in the setting of COVID-19.

Interventional oncology at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Problems and solutions

•

COVID-19 pandemic modifies in-depth interventional oncology practice.

•

Identification of aerosol-generating procedures is crucial for safety.

•

Curative treatment of cancers should not be delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

•

Solutions to overcome shortage in anesthesiology resources are described.

The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted the activity of interventional oncology in hospitals and cancer centers. In this review based on official recommendations of different international societies, but also on local solutions found in different expert large-volume centers, we discuss the changes that need to be done for the organization, safety, and patient management in interventional oncology. A literature review of potential solutions in a context of scarce anesthesiologic resources, limited staff and limited access to hospital beds are proposed and discussed based on the literature data.