Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infection (SSI) and predicted financial consequences of elimination of SSI from an English hospital

Economic and clinical outcomes of cesarean deliveries with skin closure using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape versus conventional smooth sutures plus waterproof wound dressings

OBJECTIVE

Cesarean delivery is the most common major operating room procedure performed in the United States. Wound closure after cesarean delivery includes suturing for uterine closure and to close the fascial-and sometimes subcutaneous-tissue layer followed by skin closure. Optimal skin closure is critical as it affects the risk of both cesarean wound infection and dehiscence. To our knowledge, however, no clinical or real-world studies comparing 2OPMT with conventional sutures for skin closure following cesarean delivery have been published to date. We sought to compare the economic and clinical outcomes of cesarean deliveries with skin closure using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate plus polymer mesh tape (2OPMT) versus conventional smooth sutures plus waterproof wound dressings (CS-WWD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational study using a database derived from hospital electronic health records and billing data from over 1,000 U.S. hospitals (PINC AI™ Healthcare Database). Eligible patients were aged 18-49 who underwent cesarean delivery between 1 October 2015 and 30 June 2022. From records of medical supplies used during deliveries, we identified deliveries for which skin closure was performed using either 2OPMT or CS-WWD. Outcomes included: post-surgical length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs for the cesarean delivery stay, 30-day readmissions of various acuity to the same hospital in which the cesarean delivery occurred, and two 30-day clinical/wound complication outcomes (occurrence during the initial cesarean delivery stay or within 30 days thereafter), which included: (a) a composite endpoint of cesarean wound surgical site infection and/or dehiscence; and (b) a composite endpoint of cesarean wound surgical site infection and/or dehiscence, puerperal infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection, hematoma of the skin, cellulitis, and/or other unspecified skin infection. We compared outcomes between the groups after stable balance weighting the CS-WWD group to mimic the 2OPMT group on numerous patient, provider, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

After weighting, the CSWWD (N = 13,551) and 2OPMT (N = 16,068) groups were well-balanced on all characteristics (standardized mean differences for balancing covariates <|0.10|). Compared with the CS-WWD group, the 2OPMT group had statistically significant shorter mean post-surgical LOS (1.56 days for 2OPMT vs. 1.73 days for CS-WWD, p < 0.001), lower mean hospital costs for the cesarean delivery stay ($9,499 vs. $10,362, p < 0.001), lower incidence proportions of 30-day inpatient readmission (1.43% vs. 1.83%, p = 0.009), 30-day emergency room visits (5.22% vs. 6.18%, p < 0.001), 30-day composite of inpatient readmission/emergency room visits (6.47% vs. 7.70%, p < 0.001), 30-day visits of other kinds, such as outpatient (5.32% vs. 9.50%, p < 0.001), 30-day overall readmission/visits comprising all categories above (11.00% vs. 15.90%, p < 0.001), and lower 30-day incidence proportion of cesarean wound surgical site infection and/or dehiscence (1.13% vs. 1.72%, p < 0.001) and cesarean wound surgical site infection and/or dehiscence, puerperal infection, endometritis, urinary tract infection, hematoma of the skin, cellulitis, and/or other unspecified skin infection (2.17% vs. 3.23%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large observational study, cesarean deliveries with skin closure using 2OPMT were associated with lower post-surgical length of stay, lower total hospital costs for the cesarean delivery stay, lower incidence proportions of 30-day readmissions, and lower incidence proportions of 30-day clinical/wound complications as compared with CS-WWD.

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy devices applied after Total Ankle Arthroplasty: A Hospital-Based Health Technology Assessment

INTRODUCTION

A portable, single-use incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (iNPWT) device could be used directly on the wound incision following Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA). In order to support local decision-making in a French university hospital for the adoption of such device in this indication, a three-dimensional (clinical, economic and organizational) Hospital Based-Health Technology Assessment (HB-HTA) was conducted.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The HB-HTA was based on: a literature review; results from the PICO-PTC single-site randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT03886818); and semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

Two comparative retrospective cohort studies were retrieved from the literature review. They suggested a decreased incidence of wound healing complications with iNPWT compared to standard dressings, although no difference was found in the PICO-PTC study. There was no significant difference in the PICO-PTC study on Medicine-Surgery-Obstetrics hospital costs between the two strategies: €10,639.65 [CI 95% (7,997.45; 17,988.68)] in the iNPWT group versus €9,672.59 [CI 95% (7,966.29; 13,393.65)] in the standard dressings group. Adoption of this prophylactic strategy would result in an approval to pay a 1.5% supplement to the Medicine-Surgery-Obstetrics hospitalization costs. It could also improve professionals' workflow, and facilitate wound healing monitoring for nurses in orthopedic departments compared to standard dressings.

CONCLUSION

The clinical effectiveness of the iNPWT single-use portable device could not be demonstrated compared to standard dressings for prophylactic use, in terms of the incidence of wound healing complications, in patients scheduled for TAA and not selected on the basis of risk factors. However, as this strategy may bring organizational benefits and has not been associated with significant economic costs, the adoption of iNPWT in orthopedic departments could be made according to the surgeon's clinical expertise, based for instance on the patient's risk factors for complications.

Epidemiology of surgical site infections post-cesarean section in Africa: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common postoperative complications following cesarean section, particularly in Africa. These infections pose maternal health risks, including prolonged hospitalization, increased healthcare costs, and mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the epidemiology, pooled prevalence, and risk factors for SSIs after cesarean section in Africa.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted to identify studies published between January 2000 and December 2023. The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, and 41 studies spanning 18 African countries met the inclusion criteria. Data on SSI prevalence and risk factors were extracted, and the quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence, with subgroup analysis, sensitivity analyses, and meta-regression exploring variations across study characteristics. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.

RESULTS

The pooled prevalence of SSIs after cesarean section was 11% (95% CI: 9-12.9%) with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 97%, < 0.001). Regional variations were observed, with the highest prevalence in Tanzania (34.1%) and Uganda (15%), and the lowest in Tunisia (5%) and Egypt (5.3%). Temporal trends revealed a peak in prevalence (16%) during 2011-2015, declining to 9.8% by 2016-2020. Prolonged rupture of membranes (PROM) was the most frequently reported risk factor (OR: 4.45-13.9), followed by prolonged labor (> 24 h) (OR: 3.48-16.17) and chorioamnionitis (OR: 4.37-9.74). Potential publication bias indicated by asymmetrical funnel plots.

CONCLUSION

SSIs following cesarean section remain a burden in Africa, with wide regional variations and multiple preventable risk factors. The findings highlight the need for targeted interventions, including improved infection control practices, antenatal care, and timely management of obstetric complications.

Genetically Predicted Body Composition and Risk of Surgical Site Infection: A Mendelian Randomization Study

Objective: This study employed uni-variable and multi-variable Mendelian randomization (MVMR) analyses, utilizing publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, to assess the causal relationship between body composition measures such as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), and the occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI). Patients and Methods: GWAS summary statistical data were obtained for BMI, WC, and SSI from the MRC Integrated Epidemiology Unit (MRC-IEU) database, inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the main analysis, and supplement sensitivity analysis (including heterogeneity test, pleiotropy analysis, leave-one-out analysis, and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO)) was used to check the robustness of the results. Results: The MR analysis showed that the increase in BMI and WC predicted by genes had a substantial causal effect on the incidence of SSI (IVW: odds ratio [OR] = 1.003, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.002-1.004, p < 0.001; IVW: OR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.002-1.005, p < 0.001), respectively, and the MVMR analysis showed that after jointly incorporating smoking and alcohol parameters, the impact of BMI and WC on SSI remained substantial (OR = 1.003, 95% CI = 1.002-1.004, p < 0.001; OR = 1.004, 95% CI = 1.002-1.005, p < 0.001). Conclusion: We further support the causal relationship between increased body composition including BMI and WC and the occurrence of SSI, highlighting the importance of SSI prevention in patients with obesity. Further research is required to mitigate the occurrence of surgical incisions in patients with obesity in the future.

The Barts Surgical Infection Risk (B-SIR) tool: external validation and comparison with existing tools to predict surgical site infection after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Further to previous development and internal validation of the Barts Surgical Infection Risk (B-SIR) tool, this study sought to explore the external validity of the B-SIR tool and compare it with the Australian Clinical Risk Index (ACRI), and the Brompton and Harefield Infection Score (BHIS).

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This multi-centre retrospective analysis of prospectively collected local data included adult (age ≥18 years) patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 2018 and December 2019. Pre-pandemic data were used as a reflection of standard practice. Area under the curve (AUC) was used to validate and compare the predictive power of the scores, and calibration was assessed using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and calibration plots.

RESULTS

In total, 6022 patients from three centres were included in the complete case analysis. The mean age was 66 years, 75% were men and 3.19% developed a surgical site infection (SSI). The B-SIR tool had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.686 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.649-0.723], similar to the developmental study (AUC=0.682, 95% CI 0.652-0.713). This was significantly higher than the BHIS AUC of 0.610 (95% CI 0.045-0.109; P<0.001) and the ACRI AUC of 0.614 (95% CI 0.041-0.103; P<0.001). After recalibration using a correction factor, the B-SIR tool gave accurate risk predictions (Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.423). The multiple imputation result (AUC=0.676, 95% CI 0.639-0.712) was similar to development data, and higher than the ACRI and BHIS.

CONCLUSION

External validation indicated that the B-SIR tool predicted SSI after cardiac surgery better than the ACRI and BHIS. This suggests that the B-SIR tool could be useful for use in routine practice.

The efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in the prevention of surgical site occurrences in open abdominal surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The secondary consequences of surgical site occurrences, especially surgical site infections, worsen the patient's outcomes while significantly increasing health care costs. The implementation of preventive measures to reduce this complication rate should be one of the priorities to improve health care.

METHODS

A randomized, open-label clinical trial was conducted between March 2019 and March 2021 in a general surgery department. Individuals who had undergone laparotomy and had risk factors for developing surgical site infections and surgical site occurrences were included and randomized to use either negative-pressure wound therapy or conventional dressing (control group) on the closed surgical incision. The aim of our study was to evaluate the benefit of negative-pressure wound therapy in the surgical site infection rates and other surgical site occurrences in both groups at a 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-five participants were recruited and were analyzed, 147 (53.5%) in the negative-pressure wound therapy group and 128 (46.5%) in the control group. Thirty-one (11.3%) surgical site infections and 71 (25.8%) other surgical site occurrences were observed, being significantly lower in the negative-pressure wound therapy group (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.71; P = .005) and (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.90; P = .02), respectively. Absolute risk reduction was 13% for surgical site infection and 12% for other surgical site occurrences. Number needed to treat 9 (95% confidence interval 5-29) for surgical site infection and number needed to treat of 8 (95% confidence interval 5-51) for other surgical site occurrences. Median hospital stay was 3 days lower in the negative-pressure wound therapy group than in the control group (9 vs 12 days; P = .03). No severe adverse events attributable to the negative-pressure wound therapy dressing were reported.

CONCLUSION

Negative-pressure wound therapy decreases the risk of surgical site occurrences and surgical site infection after laparotomy, so that its use should be considered in patients with risk factors.

Impact of the Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System (PICO 7 Smith and Nephew) on Surgical Site Infections in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Elective Colorectal Resections and Emergency Laparotomy

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a significant concern in colorectal surgery, impacting patient outcomes and increasing treatment costs. The study investigates the effect of PICO 7 (Smith & Nephew) dressings, a negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system, on the incidence of SSIs in high-risk patients undergoing elective colorectal resections and emergency laparotomies.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Colorectal Surgery Unit at Russell's Hall Hospital, Dudley, United Kingdom. The cohort included patients who underwent open colorectal resections and emergency laparotomies with PICO 7 dressing following laparotomy wound closure. The primary endpoint was the incidence of SSI within 30 days of surgery. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay, frequency of readmissions, episodes of return to theatre, and interventions such as radiological or open drainage of the abscess. Data were compared with existing literature, given the plan was originally to compare outcomes with a cohort managed with conventional dressings.

RESULTS

A total of 27 cases were reviewed where PICO 7 was applied. Of these, 21 were emergency laparotomies, 11 patients had a stoma created, and 16 had abdominal cavity contamination (faecal matter, pus, serous collection). The majority (14 patients) had a body mass index (BMI) >30, and 16 patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 3. Out of these, eight (30%) developed SSIs, including overlaps of dehiscence and deep space infection. The average hospital stay was 17 days, with one patient readmitted with SSI and four requiring interventions such as return to theatre or radiological drainage.

CONCLUSIONS

The study found a higher incidence of SSIs (30%) compared to existing literature, despite using NPWT. Contributing factors included perforated viscus, high BMI, multiple comorbidities, and stoma creation. A larger study cohort with a control group is necessary for further evaluation.

The effectiveness of waxing or epilation compared to conventional methods of hair removal in reducing the incidence of surgical site infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Surgical site infections (SSIs) pose a significant challenge to healthcare systems by elevating patient morbidity and mortality and driving up financial costs. Preoperative skin preparation is crucial for preventing SSIs; however, certain traditional methods of hair removal have been found to increase the risk of SSI development. Mechanical epilation and waxing constitute two relatively explored methods of hair removal, which may hold potential to accelerate wound healing due to the activation of stem cells within hair follicles. This review assesses the efficacy of preoperative hair removal via waxing and mechanical epilation in reducing SSI incidence.

Methods

This systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (ref: CRD42023423798) and a protocol previously published in a peer-reviewed journal. All findings are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and CINAHL. Inclusion criteria encompassed adult patients undergoing any surgical procedure, comparing waxing or epilation against other hair removal methods or no hair removal, with SSI incidence as the primary outcome. There was no restriction on study size or quality to ensure a comprehensive literature evaluation.

Results

The review found no studies meeting the selection criteria out of 576 records screened.

Discussion/conclusion

This review has identified no literature regarding the use of waxing and mechanical epilation as methods of preoperative hair removal. The lack of experimental evidence combined with the potential physiological advantages of these techniques indicate that this could be a valuable area of future research. These techniques may represent novel approaches to SSI prevention, particularly beneficial in high-risk surgical disciplines like vascular surgery.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=423798, PROSPERO (CRD42023423798).

Cardiothoracic Interdisciplinary Research Network, Rogers LJ, Vaja R, Bleetman D, Ali JM, Rochon M, Sanders J, Tanner J, Lamagni TL, Talukder S, Quijano-Campos JC, Lai F, Loubani M, Murphy GJ. Interventions to prevent surgical site infection in adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a common type of hospital-acquired infection and affects up to a third of patients following surgical procedures. It is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. In the United Kingdom alone, it is estimated to add another £30 million to the cost of adult cardiac surgery. Although generic guidance for SSI prevention exists, this is not specific to adult cardiac surgery. Furthermore, many of the risk factors for SSI are prevalent within the cardiac surgery population. Despite this, there is currently no standard of care for SSI prevention in adults undergoing cardiac surgery throughout the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods of care, with variations in practice existing throughout from risk stratification, decontamination strategies and surveillance.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective: to assess the clinical effectiveness of pre-, intra-, and postoperative interventions in the prevention of cardiac SSI.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

(i) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention interventions on morbidity, mortality, and resource use; (ii) to evaluate the effects of SSI prevention care bundles on morbidity, mortality, and resource use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE (Ovid, from inception) and Embase (Ovid, from inception) on 31 May 2021.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) were also searched for ongoing or unpublished trials on 21 May 2021. No language restrictions were imposed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs evaluating interventions to reduce SSI in adults (≥ 18 years of age) who have undergone any cardiac surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed the methods as per our published Cochrane protocol. Our primary outcome was surgical site infection. Our secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, reoperation for SSI, hospital length of stay, hospital readmissions for SSI, healthcare costs and cost-effectiveness, quality of life (QoL), and adverse effects. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 118 studies involving 51,854 participants were included. Twenty-two interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery were identified. The risk of bias was judged to be high in the majority of studies. There was heterogeneity in the study populations and interventions; consequently, meta-analysis was not appropriate for many of the comparisons and these are presented as narrative summaries. We focused our reporting of findings on four comparisons deemed to be of great clinical relevance by all review authors. Decolonisation versus no decolonisation Pooled data from three studies (n = 1564) using preoperative topical oral/nasal decontamination in all patients demonstrated an uncertain direction of treatment effect in relation to total SSI (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.36; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study reported that decolonisation likely results in little to no difference in superficial SSI (RR 1.35, 95% CI 0.84 to 2.15; moderate-certainty evidence) and a reduction in deep SSI (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.77; high-certainty evidence). The evidence on all-cause mortality from three studies (n = 1564) is very uncertain (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.84; I2 = 49%; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) demonstrated that decolonisation may result in little to no difference in hospital readmission for SSI (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.45; low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 954) reported one case of temporary discolouration of teeth in the decolonisation arm (low-certainty-evidence. Reoperation for SSI was not reported. Tight glucose control versus standard glucose control Pooled data from seven studies (n = 880) showed that tight glucose control may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.85; I2 = 29%; numbers need to treat to benefit (NNTB) = 13; very-low certainty evidence). Pooled data from seven studies (n = 3334) showed tight glucose control may reduce all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.91; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Based on four studies (n = 2793), there may be little to no difference in episodes of hypoglycaemia between tight control vs. standard control, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 2.12, 95% CI 0.51 to 8.76; I2 = 72%; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, reoperation for SSI, or hospital readmission for SSI. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) versus standard dressings NPWT was assessed in two studies (n = 144) and it may reduce total SSI, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.97; I2 = 0%; NNTB = 10; very low-certainty evidence). A single study (n = 80) reported reoperation for SSI. The relative effect could not be estimated. The certainty of evidence was judged to be very low. No studies reported superficial/deep SSI, all-cause mortality, hospital readmission for SSI, or adverse effects. Topical antimicrobials versus no topical antimicrobials Five studies (n = 5382) evaluated topical gentamicin sponge, which may reduce total SSI (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.84; I2 = 48%; NNTB = 32), superficial SSI (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.98; I2 = 69%), and deep SSI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96; I2 = 5%; low-certainty evidence. Four studies (n = 4662) demonstrated that topical gentamicin sponge may result in little to no difference in all-cause mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.42; I2 = 0%; very low-certainty evidence). Reoperation for SSI, hospital readmission for SSI, and adverse effects were not reported in any included studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides the broadest and most recent review of the current evidence base for interventions to reduce SSI in adults undergoing cardiac surgery. Twenty-one interventions were identified across the perioperative period. Evidence is of low to very low certainty primarily due to significant heterogeneity in how interventions were implemented and the definitions of SSI used. Knowledge gaps have been identified across a number of practices that should represent key areas for future research. Efforts to standardise SSI outcome reporting are warranted.

The economic burden of nosocomial infections for hospitals: evidence from Germany

BACKGROUND

Nosocomial infections (NI) significantly worsen patient outcomes, resulting in higher mortality rates and reduced health-related quality of life. Furthermore, they pose substantial economic strain on healthcare systems and hospitals. For instance, patients with nosocomial infections (NIs) experience prolonged hospital stays compared to those without NIs. These extended stays result in occupied bed-days, leading to opportunity costs for hospitals. This study aimed to estimate the opportunity costs for a German hospital based on hospital stays, daily revenue, and occupancy rates (OCR).

METHODS

We analysed cost data obtained from routine records maintained by the accounting department of a German hospital's surgical and orthopedic units from 2018 to 2019 for the "HygArzt" research project. To ensure balance, we employed genetic matching. We estimated the differences in length of stay (LOS) and daily revenue between patients with and without nosocomial infections (NI) using linear regression. Finally, we calculated the opportunity cost borne by the hospital by treating NI patients instead of non-NI patients. All costs are reported in 2018 Euros.

RESULTS

The final sample included 81 patients with NI matched with 207 patients without NI. The majority of the NI patients (77.0%) had surgical site infection (SSI). Compared to non-NI patients, we observed that NI patients had a longer LOS (10 days, p < 0.001) and lower daily revenue (€400, p < 0.001). We also found that comorbidities and the frequency of operations had significant impact on the LOS. Using a baseline 30 to 50% preventable NIs, successful prevention of a single NI could potentially reduce the length of hospital stay by 3 to 5 days and increase hospital revenue by approximately €120 to €200 per day per prevented NI. Consequently, the hospital saves 3 to 5 more bed-days to backfill and generate more revenue, and/or make more efficient resource allocation by changing bed-capacity and staffing. The resulting opportunity costs can potentially exceed €1,000 per preventable case.

CONCLUSION

NIs pose a substantial economic burden for hospitals. From a health economics' perspective, there are strong economic incentives for hospitals to implement infection control interventions, such as the involvement of a prevention link physician/nurse.

Influencing factors and preventive measures of infectious complications after intestinal resection for Crohn's disease

The incidence of Crohn's disease (CD) has increased in recent years, with most patients requiring intestinal resection. Complications after intestinal resection for CD can lead to poor prognosis and recurrence, among which infectious complications are the most common. This study aimed to investigate the common risk factors, including medications, preoperative nutritional status, surgery-related factors, microorganisms, lesion location and type, and so forth, causing infectious complications after intestinal resection for CD, and to propose corresponding preventive measures. The findings provided guidance for identifying susceptibility factors and the early intervention and prevention of infectious complications after intestinal resection for CD in clinical practice.

Subcutaneous Lumbar Spine Index (SLSI) as a Risk Factor for Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective matched case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the value of Subcutaneous Lumbar Spine Index (SLSI) as a predictor of early surgical site infection (SSI) after lumbar intervertebral fusion surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed on patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2019 in a single institution. Cases were defined as those who developed early SSI according to the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention criteria, and controls were matched from those patients without early SSI using the following matched criteria: gender, age, time of surgery and diabetes. Subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) and SLSI were measured on preoperative MRI mid-sagittal T2 weighted images.

RESULTS

A total of 3615 patients who underwent TLIF were enrolled in this study. Thirty-three patients were included in early SSI, and sixty-six patients were selected as matched controls. Univariate analysis indicated that fusion levels (P = .007), operation time (P = .022), obesity (P = .013), SFT (P = .002) and SLSI (P = .001) were significantly associated with early SSI. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that multilevel fusion levels (P = .021), obesity (P = .035), a large SFT (P = .026) and a high SLSI (P = .012) were independent risk factors. Body mass index (BMI) and SLSI were moderately correlated (r2 = .55). ROC curve demonstrated that SLSI was more sensitive than SFT to predict the early SSI.

CONCLUSION

SLSI is a novel radiological risk factor for early SSI development and is a better indicator than SFT to predict early SSI risk after lumbar intervertebral fusion.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic and Reduced Surgical Site Infection After Cardiac Surgery: A Potential Blessing in Disguise

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has brought about drastic hygienic measures, one upside of which might be the mitigated occurrence of surgical site infection (SSI). This study investigated the association of the pandemic with SSI occurrence after cardiac surgeries. Patients and Methods: From 2014 to 2022, patients undergoing cardiac surgery were included and categorized into pre-pandemic and during-pandemic groups. Surgical site infections were classified into harvest-site, superficial sternal, and complex sternal infection. Multiple logistic regression and inverse probability weighting assessed the association of the pandemic with SSI. Results: Among a total of 26,143 patients, 793 SSIs occurred. The during-pandemic patients were younger (61.87 ± 10.58 vs. 65.64 ± 11.82) with a higher male proportion (70.1% vs. 67.4%) and a higher prevalence of all studied comorbidities/risk factors (expect cigarette smoking). Total SSI rate decreased substantially from 3.3% before COVID-19 to 1.8% afterward (p < 0.001). Inverse probability weights analyses evinced an independent association of the pandemic with a reduced risk of total (adjusted odds ratio [OR]; 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45-0.78), harvest-site (adjusted OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.70), and superficial sternal infection (adjusted OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.81). No significant association was observed with complex sternal site infection (adjusted OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.55-2.01). Multivariable regression recapitulated these findings. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic independently pertained to more than a 40% reduction in SSI occurrence, particularly affecting harvest-site and superficial sternal infections. However, there remains the possibility of the implications of other known and unknown confounders on the observed association. To some extent, the decrease in SSIs after the pandemic can be justified by reinforced hygienic precautions, emphasizing the necessity of extending the adherence to these measurements into the post-COVID-19 era to maintain the status quo.

Closed-incision negative pressure therapy as a strategy to reduce sternal wound infection in identified high-risk patients: a multicentre propensity matched study

OBJECTIVES

The premise of this retrospective study was to evaluate the intraoperative use of closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) to help reduce the incidence of postoperative sternal wound infections in multimorbid patients with an elevated risk of developing a sternal wound infection post cardiac surgery versus a cohort that received standard-of-care dressings.

METHODS

Data for all adult patients were collected from each cardiothoracic surgery unit across 3 hospitals in the United Kingdom. High-risk patients had 2 or more recognized risk factors. Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) and unpaired t-test were used to help analyse categorical and continuous data. Propensity matching was performed to compare the 2 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 5,288 patients who had cardiac surgery were included. Propensity matching led to 766 matched cases. There were significantly fewer sternal wound infections in the ciNPT group [43 (5.6%) vs 119 (15.5%) cases; P = 0.0001], as well as fewer deep sternal wound infections [14 (1.8%) vs 31 (4.0%) cases; P = 0.0149] and superficial sternal wound infections [29 (3.8%) vs 88 (11.4%) cases; P = 0.0001]. A higher mean length of stay in the ciNPT group was statistically significant (11.23 ± 13 vs 9.66 ± 10 days; P = 0.0083) as was a significantly higher mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) (11.143 ± 13 vs 8.094 ± 11; P = 0.0001). A statistically significant higher readmission to the intensive care unit due to sternal wound infection was noted for the controls [16 (2.08%) vs 3 (0.39%) readmissions; P = 0.0042].

CONCLUSIONS

The ciNPT appears to be an effective intervention to help reduce the incidence of sternal wound infection in high-risk individuals undergoing cardiac surgery.

Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) protocol

Aims

Hand trauma, consisting of injuries to both the hand and the wrist, are a common injury seen worldwide. The global age-standardized incidence of hand trauma exceeds 179 per 100,000. Hand trauma may require surgical management and therefore result in significant costs to both healthcare systems and society. Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common following all surgical interventions, and within hand surgery the risk of SSI is at least 5%. SSI following hand trauma surgery results in significant costs to healthcare systems with estimations of over £450 per patient. The World Health Organization (WHO) have produced international guidelines to help prevent SSIs. However, it is unclear what variability exists in the adherence to these guidelines within hand trauma. The aim is to assess compliance to the WHO global guidelines in prevention of SSI in hand trauma.

Methods

This will be an international, multicentre audit comparing antimicrobial practices in hand trauma to the standards outlined by WHO. Through the Reconstructive Surgery Trials Network (RSTN), hand surgeons across the globe will be invited to participate in the study. Consultant surgeons/associate specialists managing hand trauma and members of the multidisciplinary team will be identified at participating sites. Teams will be asked to collect data prospectively on a minimum of 20 consecutive patients. The audit will run for eight months. Data collected will include injury details, initial management, hand trauma team management, operation details, postoperative care, and antimicrobial techniques used throughout. Adherence to WHO global guidelines for SSI will be summarized using descriptive statistics across each criteria.

Discussion

The Hand and Wrist trauma: Antimicrobials and Infection Audit of Clinical Practice (HAWAII ACP) will provide an understanding of the current antimicrobial practice in hand trauma surgery. This will then provide a basis to guide further research in the field. The findings of this study will be disseminated via conference presentations and a peer-reviewed publication.

Establishing semi-automated infection surveillance in obstetrics and gynaecology

BACKGROUND

Surveillance is an acknowledged method to decrease nosocomial infections, such as surgical site infections (SSIs). Electronic healthcare records create the opportunity for automated surveillance. While approaches for different types of surgeries and indicators already exist, there are very few for obstetrics and gynaecology.

AIM

To analyse the sensitivity and workload reduction of semi-automated surveillance in obstetrics and gynaecology.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-centre study at a 1438-bed tertiary care hospital in Germany, semi-automated SSI surveillance using the indicators 'antibiotic prescription', 'microbiological data' and 'administrative data' (diagnosis codes, readmission, post-hospitalization care) was compared with manual analysis and categorization of all patient files. Breast surgeries (BSs) conducted in 2018 and caesarean sections (CSs) that met the inclusion criteria between May 2013 and December 2019 were included. Indicators were analysed for sensitivity, number of analysed procedures needed to identify one case, and potential workload reduction in detecting SSIs in comparison with the control group.

FINDINGS

The reference standard showed nine SSIs in 416 BSs (2.2%). Sensitivities for the indicators 'antibiotic prescription', 'diagnosis code', 'microbiological sample taken', and the combination 'diagnosis code or microbiological sample' were 100%, 88.9%, 66.7% and 100%, respectively. The reference standard showed 54 SSIs in 3438 CSs (1.6%). Sensitivities for the indicators 'collection of microbiological samples', 'diagnosis codes', 'readmission/post-hospitalization care', and the combination of all indicators were 38.9%, 27.8%, 85.2% and 94.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Semi-automated surveillance systems may reduce workload by maintaining high sensitivity depending on the type of surgery, local circumstances and thorough digitalization.

Sex differences in surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass grafting: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) following cardiac surgery poses a significant challenge for healthcare providers. Despite advances in surgical techniques and infection control measures, SSI remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, in addition to being a significant economic burden on healthcare services. Current literature suggests there is a reproducible difference in the incidence of SSI following cardiac surgery between sexes. We aim to assess the sex-specific predictive risk factors for sternal SSI following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in addition to identifying any differences in the causative organisms between groups.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing isolated CABG between January 2012 and December 2022 in one UK hospital organization were included. In this 10-year, retrospective observational study, a total of 10,208 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pre-operative risk factors were identified using univariate analysis. To assess dependence between sex and organism or Gram stain, a Pearson Chi-squared test with Yates correction for continuity was performed.

RESULTS

In total there were 8457 males of which 181 developed a sternal SSI (2.14%) and 1751 females, 128 of whom had a sternal SSI (7.31%). Male patients were found to be significantly more likely to develop an SSI secondary to a Gram-positive organism, whereas female patients were more likely to have a Gram-negative causative organism (P<0.00001). Staphylococcus was statistically more likely to be the causative organism genus in male patients. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found to be twice as common in the female cohort compared with the male group.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found a statistically significant difference in the causative organisms and Gram stain for post-CABG sternal SSIs between males and females. Male patients predominately have Gram-positive associated SSIs, whereas female SSI pathogens are more likely to be Gram negative. The preoperative risk profiles of both cohorts are similar, including being an insulin-dependent diabetic and triple vessel coronary artery disease. Given these findings, it prompts the question, should we be tailoring our SSI treatment strategies according to sex and associated risk profiles?

Surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Worldwide, surgery related deaths within 30 days of the procedure accounts the third contributor among all causes of deaths, with an estimated 4.2 million people annually and half of these deaths occur in low and middle income countries.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pooled prevalence of surgical site infection following cesarean section and its predictors in Ethiopia.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by using PRISMA guideline. An appropriate and comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar, HINARI and Scopus was done. This SRMA included all articles conducted in all regional state of Ethiopia reporting the prevalence/proportion/incidence of SSI after cesarean section and/or associated factors. All observational study designs were included in this SRMA. Articles which lack our outcome of interest: SSI following cesarean section and its predictors were excluded from this SRMA. The I2 statistic was used to quantify heterogeneity across studies. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's tests were used to check for publication bias. A random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of SSI. Adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was also considered to determine the association of identified variables with SSI. Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA version 17 software.

RESULT

Initially 6334 studies were identified and finally 19 studies were found eligible for the analysis. Studies with a score of 7 and above were included for the final systematic review and meta-analysis. The review was comprised of 14 cross sectional studies, 4 cohort and one case control studies. The pooled estimate of SSI in Ethiopia was 11.13% (95%CI, 9.29-12.97%). Prolonged labor (AOR = 3.16, 95% CI; (2.14-4.68)), chorioamnionitis (AOR = 4.26, 95% CI; (1.99-8.91)), prolonged PROM (AOR = 3.80, 95% CI; (2.51-5.62)), repeated vaginal examination (AOR = 3.80, 95% CI; (2.45-5.88)), decreased hemoglobin level (AOR = 4.57, 95%CI; (3.16-6.60)), vertical skin incision (AOR = 3.09, 95% CI; (2.04-4.67)) and general anesthesia (AOR = 1.82, 95% CI (1.21-2.75)) are significantly associated with SSI after cesarean section in Ethiopia.

CONCLUSION

SSI after cesarean section in Ethiopia is high. Prolonged labor, chorioamnionits, prolonged PROM, repeated vaginal examination, decreased Hgb level, vertical skin incision and general anesthesia were positively associated. Thus, evidence based intra-partum care should be practiced.

Delayed versus primary closure to minimize risk of surgical-site infection for complicated appendicitis: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial using counterfactual prediction modeling

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) following complicated appendectomy in individual patients receiving delayed primary closure (DPC) versus primary closure (PC) after adjustment for individual risk factors.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of randomized controlled trial (RCT) with prediction model.

SETTING

Referral centers across Thailand.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients who underwent appendectomy via a lower-right-quadrant abdominal incision due to complicated appendicitis.

METHODS

A secondary analysis of a published RCT was performed applying a counterfactual prediction model considering interventions (PC vs DPC) and other significant predictors. A multivariable logistic regression was applied, and a likelihood-ratio test was used to select significant predictors to retain in a final model. Factual versus counterfactual SSI risks for individual patients along with individual treatment effect (iTE) were estimated.

RESULTS

In total, 546 patients (271 PC vs 275 DPC) were included in the analysis. The individualized prediction model consisted of allocated intervention, diabetes, type of complicated appendicitis, fecal contamination, and incision length. The iTE varied between 0.4% and 7% for PC compared to DPC; ∼38.1% of patients would have ≥2.1% lower SSI risk following PC compared to DPC. The greatest risk reduction was identified in diabetes with ruptured appendicitis, fecal contamination, and incision length of 10 cm, where SSI risks were 47.1% and 54.1% for PC and DPC, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this secondary analysis, we found that most patients benefited from early PC versus DPC. Findings may be used to inform SSI prevention strategies for patients with complicated appendicitis.

Harnessing of Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Systematic Review

Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are the most common adverse events in healthcare and constitute a major global public health concern. Surveillance represents the foundation for the effective prevention and control of HAIs, yet conventional surveillance is costly and labor intensive. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have the potential to support the development of HAI surveillance algorithms for the understanding of HAI risk factors, the improvement of patient risk stratification as well as the prediction and timely detection and prevention of infections. AI-supported systems have so far been explored for clinical laboratory testing and imaging diagnosis, antimicrobial resistance profiling, antibiotic discovery and prediction-based clinical decision support tools in terms of HAIs. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the current literature on AI applications in the field of HAIs and discuss the future potentials of this emerging technology in infection practice. Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study examined the articles in databases including PubMed and Scopus until November 2023, which were screened based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, resulting in 162 included articles. By elucidating the advancements in the field, we aim to highlight the potential applications of AI in the field, report related issues and shortcomings and discuss the future directions.

Comparison of surgical site infection (SSI) between negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) assisted delayed primary closure and conventional delayed primary closure in grossly contaminated emergency abdominal surgeries: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

NPWT has been tried in many surgical fields, including colorectal, thoracic, vascular, and non-healing wounds, for the prevention of SSI. However, its efficacy in the prevention of SSI-grade IV closed abdominal wounds is yet to be explored.

METHODS

All patients with grade IV abdominal wounds were included in the study. They were randomized into the conventional arm and the VAC arm after confirming the diagnosis intra-operatively. The sheath was closed, and the skin was laid open in the postoperative period. In the VAC arm, the NPWT dressing was applied on postoperative day (POD)-1 and removed on POD-5. In the conventional arm, only regular dressing was done postoperatively. The skin was closed with a delayed primary intention on POD-5 in both arms. The sutures were removed after 7 to 10 days of skin closure.

RESULTS

The rate of SSI (10% in the VAC arm vs. 37.5% in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.004) was significantly lower in the VAC arm, as were the rates of seroma formation (2.4% in the VAC arm vs. 20% in the conventional arm, p = 0.014) and wound dehiscence (7.3% vs. 30%, p = 0.011). The conventional arm had a significant delay in skin closure beyond POD5 due to an increased rate of SSI, which also led to a prolonged hospital stay (5 days in the VAC arm vs. 6.5 days in the conventional arm, p-value = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The VAC dressing can be used routinely in grade IV closed abdominal wounds to reduce the risk of SSI and wound dehiscence.

Cohort study to characterise surgical site infections after open surgery in the UK's National Health Service

OBJECTIVE

To characterise surgical site infections (SSIs) after open surgery in the UK's National Health Service.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis of electronic records of patients from Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked with Hospital Episode Statistics' secondary care datasets.

SETTING

Clinical practice in the community and secondary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Cohort of 50 000 adult patients who underwent open surgery between 2017 and 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of SSI, clinical outcomes, patterns of care and costs of wound management.

RESULTS

11% (5281/50 000) of patients developed an SSI a mean of 18.4±14.7 days after their surgical procedure, of which 15% (806/5281) were inpatients and 85% (4475/5281) were in the community after hospital discharge. The incidence of SSI varied according to anatomical site of surgery. The incidence also varied according to a patient's risk and whether they underwent an emergency procedure. SSI onset reduced the 6 months healing rate by a mean of 3 percentage points and increased time to wound healing by a mean of 15 days per wound. SSIs were predominantly managed in the community by practice and district nurses and 16% (850/5281) of all patients were readmitted into hospital. The total health service cost of surgical wound management following SSI onset was a mean of £3537 per wound ranging from £2542 for a low-risk patient who underwent an elective procedure to £4855 for a high-risk patient who underwent an emergency procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides important insights into several aspects of SSI management in clinical practice in the UK that have been difficult to ascertain from surveillance data. Surgeons are unlikely to be fully aware of the true incidence of SSI and how they are managed once patients are discharged from hospital. Current SSI surveillance services appear to be under-reporting the actual incidence.

Effectiveness of iodine-impregnated incise drapes for preventing surgical site infection in patients with clean or clean contaminated wounds: A systematic literature review and cost-consequence analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection is a serious complication associated with significant morbidity, mortality and health care expenditure.

AIMS

To determine the clinical effectiveness and economic impact of using iodine-impregnated incise drapes for preventing surgical site infection.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases were systematically searched. Critical appraisal and synthesis of clinical evidence informed a decision analytical cost-consequence model.

FINDINGS

Nine studies were included in the systematic literature review. Evidence from cardiac surgery patients was considered appropriate to inform the cost analysis. The economic model evaluation estimated cost savings of £549 per patient with the iodophor-impregnated drape in the deterministic analysis and a mean cost saving per patient of £554,172 per 1000 in the probabilistic analysis.

CONCLUSION

Using iodine-impregnated drapes in cardiac surgery patients may effectively reduce infections and provide cost-savings, but further research is required.

Clinical and economic burden of surgical complications during hospitalization for digestive cancer surgery in France

BACKGROUND

Surgical complications and particularly infections after digestive cancer surgery remain a major health and economic problem and its burden in France is not well documented.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to analyse recent data regarding surgical complications in patients undergoing major digestive cancer surgery, and to estimate its burden for the French society.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using the 2018 French hospital discharge database and 2017 National CostStudy we studied hospital stays for surgical resection in patients withdigestive cancer. The population was divided into three groups based onpostoperative outcomes: no complications (NC), related infectious complications (RIC) and other complications. The main analysis compared the length and cost per stay between RIC and NC. Forty-Four thousand one hundred and twenty-three stays following a digestive cancer resection were identified. Lower gastro-intestinal cancers were the most prevalent representing 74.8% of stays, the rate of malnutrition was 32.8% and 15.8% of patients presented RIC. Mean (SD) length of stay varied from 11,7 (9.0) days for NC to 25,5 days (19.5) for RIC (p < 0.01). The mean cost per patients' stay (SD) varied from €10 641 (€ 5897) for the NC to €18 720 (€7905) for RIC (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

The risk of RIC after digestive cancer resection remains high (>15%) and was associated with significantly longer length of stay and higher cost per stay. Although important prevention plans have been implemented in recent years, care strategies are still needed to alleviate the burden on patients and the healthcare system.

The incidence and cost implications of surgical site infection following lymph node surgery for skin malignancy

BACKGROUND

Lymph node surgery is commonly performed in the staging and treatment of metastatic skin cancer. Previous studies have demonstrated sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and, particularly, lymph node dissection (LND) to be plagued by high rates of wound complications, including surgical site infection (SSI) and seroma formation. This study evaluated the incidence of wound complications following lymph node surgery and provided the first published cost estimate of SSI associated with lymph node surgery in the UK.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of 169 patients with a histological diagnosis of primary skin malignancy who underwent SLNB or LND of the axilla and/or inguinal region at a single tertiary centre over a 2 year period was conducted. Demographic, patient risk factor, and operation characteristics data were collected and effect on SSI and seroma formation was analysed. Cost-per-infection was estimated using National Health Service (NHS) reference and antibiotic costs.

RESULTS

A total of 146 patients underwent SLNB with a SSI rate of 4.1% and a seroma incidence of 12.3%. Twenty-three patients underwent LND with a SSI rate of 39.1% and a seroma incidence of 39.1%. Seroma formation was strongly associated with the development of SSI in both the SLNB (odds ratio (OR) = 18.0, p < 0.001) and LND (OR = 21.0, p = 0.007) group. The median additional cost of care events and treatment of SSI in the SLNB and LND groups was £199.46 and £5187.04, respectively.

CONCLUSION

SSI remains a troublesome and costly event following SLNB and LND. Further research into perioperative care protocols and methods of reducing lymph node surgery morbidity is required and could result in significant cost savings to the NHS.

Reducing Surgical Site Infections Post-Caesarean Section

Background

Surgical Site Infections (SSI) are one of the most common complications after a caesarean with significant morbidity. Evidence suggests that SSI rates can be reduced post caesarean by using a Leukomed® Sorbact® (Essity) bacteria binding wound dressing, thereby reducing bacterial wound colonisation. Barking, Havering & Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK (BHRUT) maternity unit sought change their clinical practice by using Leukomed Sorbact and evaluate if this reduced their SSI rate, SSI readmission rate, antibiotic usage and evaluate any associated cost savings.

Methods

From January 1st 2022, Mepore® (Molnlycke) wound dressings were replaced with Leukomed Sorbact for all caesareans. Retrospective and prospective audits were undertaken to compare SSI incidence pre- and post- implementation of the dressing. No changes were made to wound cleaning products, prophylactic antibiotic use or surgical technique. Wound closure technique remained the choice of the individual surgeon.

Results

Prior to this practice change, the baseline SSI rate between January-December 2021 was 6.1% and the SSI readmission rate was 1.27%. Comparative data for January-December 2022 showed a 38% reduction in SSI rates (overall SSI rate = 3.8%), a 31% reduction in readmission rate for SSI (overall rate = 0.88%), a 38% reduction in readmission bed days and a 30% reduction in antibiotic use. There was a reduction in SSI rates in all body mass index (BMI) categories. Total savings due to the reduction in SSI rates over twelve months were £234,784. The cost savings to BHRUT solely attributable to the reduction in readmissions was £49,750 or £21 per Caesarean, which will be an ongoing saving.

Conclusion

The use of Leukomed Sorbact dressings after Caesarean resulted in improved clinical outcomes with reduced SSI and readmission rates. Investment in the new dressing was cost effective when considering bed days freed, the reduction in antibiotic usage, reduced morbidity and improved patient experience.

Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study

Surgical site complications (SSCs), including surgical site infection (SSI), are common following C-sections. Management of the post-operative incision with single-use negative pressure wound therapy (sNPWT) has been shown to reduce the risk of SSC in high-risk individuals. This study explored the outcomes of routine, real-world use of sNPWT in high-risk patients undergoing C-sections. An observational, retrospective in-service evaluation was conducted across eight obstetric centres in the Republic and Northern Ireland. Patients undergoing C-sections were stratified for their risk of developing SSC using commonly known risk factors, including BMI ≥30, smoking, diabetes, and whether the patients had undergone previous C-sections or had a previous history of wound dehiscence. Those at high-risk were treated with sNPWT post-operatively. Data relating to any SSC that developed post-operatively, for up to 30 days, were captured. Data were compared with original research previously published by Wloch et al. (2012). Of 1111 women considered high-risk, 106 (9.5%) went on to develop SSCs, predominantly superficial SSIs. SSCs were associated with extra visits with their general practitioner (GP), outpatient visits, or inpatient hospital stays in 5.7%, 2.4%, and 1.7% of the entire cohort, representing 59.4%, 25.5%, and 17.9% of the 106 patients with SSC. Patients needed on average 1.8 extra GP visits and 0.7 extra outpatient visits. Patients who needed to be readmitted to hospital had an average length of stay of 4 days. In comparison with a previously published cohort, in which sNPWT was not used, we observed a significant reduction in the incidence of SSCs across BMI groups 18.5-24.9 (P = 0.02), 25-29.9 (P = 0.003), and ≥35 kg/m2 (P = 0.04). In those patients who had undergone at least one previous C-section, the rates of complications also reduced (P = 0.006). This analysis provides further justification for using sNPWT to manage surgical incisions in patients considered at high risk of developing post-procedural SSCs, particularly those with a BMI ≥30 or a history of more than one C-section.

Plus Sutures for preventing surgical site infection: a systematic review of clinical outcomes with economic and environmental models

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent ~ 20% of all hospital-acquired infections in surgical patients and are associated with prolonged hospital stay, admission to intensive care, and mortality. We conducted a systematic review with economic and environmental models to assess whether triclosan-coated sutures (Plus Sutures) provide benefits over non-coated sutures in the reduction of SSI risk.

METHODS

Searches were conducted in fifteen databases. A total of 1,991 records were retrieved. Following deduplication and screening by two independent reviewers, 31 randomized controlled trials in adults and children were included in the review. Similarity of the studies was assessed by narrative review and confirmed by quantitative assessment. A fixed effects meta-analysis of SSI incidence model including all groups of patients estimated a risk ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval: 0.64 to 0.79) indicating those in the Plus Sutures group had a 29% reduction in the risk of developing an SSI compared with those in the control group (p < 0.001). Safety outcomes were analysed qualitatively.

RESULTS

The economic model estimated the use of Plus Sutures to result in average cost savings of £13.63 per patient. Plus Sutures remained cost-saving in all subgroup analyses with cost-savings ranging between £11 (clean wounds) and £140 (non-clean wounds). The environmental impact of SSI is substantial, and the model suggests that the introduction of Plus Sutures could result in potential environmental benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence suggests that Plus Sutures are associated with a reduced incidence of SSI across all surgery types alongside cost savings when compared with standard sutures.

Global incidence of surgical site infections following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection (SSI) is a health-threatening complication following caesarean section (CS); however, to the authors' knowledge, there is no worldwide estimate of the burden of post-CS SSIs. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the global and regional incidence of post-CS SSIs and associated factors.

METHODS

International scientific databases were searched systematically for observational studies published from January 2000 to March 2023, without language or geographical restrictions. The pooled global incidence rate was estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis (REM), and then stratified by World-Health-Organization-defined regions as well as by sociodemographic and study characteristics. Causative pathogens and associated risk factors of SSIs were also analysed using REM. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2.

RESULTS

In total, 180 eligible studies (207 datasets) involving 2,188,242 participants from 58 countries were included in this review. The pooled global incidence of post-CS SSIs was 5.63% [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.18-6.11%]. The highest and lowest incidence rates for post-CS SSIs were estimated for the African (11.91%, 95% CI 9.67-14.34%) and North American (3.87%, 95% CI 3.02-4.83%) regions, respectively. The incidence was significantly higher in countries with lower income and human development index levels. The pooled incidence estimates have increased steadily over time, with the highest incidence rate during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (2019-2023). Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli were the most prevalent pathogens. Several risk factors were identified.

CONCLUSION

An increasing and substantial burden from post-CS SSIs was identified, especially in low-income countries. Further research, greater awareness and the development of effective prevention and management strategies are warranted to reduce post-CS SSIs.

A systematic review with meta-analysis on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing for obese women after caesarean section

AIMS

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in obese women undergoing caesarean section.

DESIGN

An updated review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to March 2022 without restriction in language. We chose surgical site infection as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

NPWT resulted in a lower surgical site infection rate compared with conventional dressing (risk ratio [RR] = 0.76). The infection rate after low transverse incision was lower comparing the NPWT group with the control group ([RR] = 0.76). No statistically significant difference was detected in blistering([RR] = 2.91). The trial sequential analysis did not support the 20% relative decrease in surgical site infection in the NPWT group. (type II error of 20%).

Can triclosan-coated sutures reduce the postoperative rate of wound infection? Data from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Wound infections are typical postoperative complications with considerable therapeutic consequences and high personnel and financial costs. Previous meta-analyses have shown that triclosan-coated sutures can reduce the risk of postoperative wound infection. This work aimed to update previous meta-analyses with a special focus on different subgroups.

METHODS

A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed (registration: PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022344194). The search was independently performed in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane databases by 2 reviewers. A critical methods review of all included full texts took place. The trustworthiness of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of the suture material was carried out.

RESULTS

In this meta-analysis of 29 randomized controlled trials, the use of triclosan-coated suture material resulted in a significant reduction of postoperative wound infection rate (24%) (random-effects model; risk ratio: 0.76; 95% confidence interval: [0.67-0.87]). The effect was evident in the subgroups according to wound contamination class, underlying oncologic disease, and pure preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. In the subgroup analysis by the operating department, the significant effect was visible only in the abdominal surgery group.

CONCLUSION

Based on the randomized controlled clinical trials reviewed, triclosan-coated sutures reduced postoperative wound infection rates in the main study and most subgroups. Additional costs of up to 12 euros for the coated suture material appear to be justified to generate an economic benefit for the hospital by reducing postoperative wound infections. The additional socioeconomic benefit of reducing wound infection rates was not investigated here.

A systematic review of cost and well-being in hip and knee replacements surgical site infections

This systematic review examined peer-reviewed literature published from 2010 to 2020 to investigate the health care system costs, hidden out-of-pocket expenses and quality of life impact of surgical site infections (SSIs) and to develop an overall summary of the burden they place on patients. SSI can significantly impact patients' treatment experience and quality of life. Understanding patients' SSI-related burden may assist in developing more effective strategies aimed at lessening the effects of SSI in financial and well-being consequences. Peer-reviewed articles on adult populations (over 18 years old) in orthopaedic elective hip and knee surgeries published from 2010 to 2020 were considered. Only publications in English and studies conducted in high-income countries were eligible for inclusion. A search strategy based on the MESH term and the CINAHL terms classification was developed. Five databases (Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, Medline, Web of Science) were searched for relevant sources. Reviewers categorised and uploaded identified citations to Covidence and EndNoteX9. Reviewers will assess article titles, abstracts and the full text for compliance with the inclusion criteria. Ongoing discussions between reviewers resolved disagreements at each selection process stage. The final scoping review reported the citation inclusion process and presented search results in a PRISMA flow diagram. Four main themes were extracted from a thematic analysis of included studies (N = 30): Hospital costing (n = 21); Societal perspective of health system costing (n = 2); Patients and societal well-being (n = 6) and Epidemiological database and surveillance (n = 22). This systematic review has synthesised a range of themes associated with the overall incidence and impact of SSI that can inform decision making for policymakers. Further analysis is required to understand the burden on SSI patients.

Impact of surgical-site infection on health utility values: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are recognized as negatively affecting patient quality of life. No meta-analysis of SSI utility values is available in the literature to inform estimates of this burden and investment decisions in prevention.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database was performed in April 2022 in accordance with PROSPERO registration CRD 42021262633. Studies were included where quality-of-life data were gathered from adults undergoing surgery, and such data were presented for those with and without an SSI at similar time points. Two researchers undertook data extraction and quality appraisal independently, with a third as arbiter. Utility values were converted to EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D™) estimates. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model across all relevant studies, with subgroup analyses on type and timing of the SSI.

RESULTS

In total, 15 studies with 2817 patients met the inclusion criteria. Six studies across seven time points were used in the meta-analysis. The pooled mean difference in EQ-5D™ utility in all studies combined was -0.08 (95 per cent c.i. -0.11 to -0.05; prediction interval -0.16 to -0.01; I2 = 40 per cent). The mean difference in EQ-5D™ utility associated with deep SSI was -0.10 (95 per cent c.i. -0.14 to -0.06; I2 = 0 per cent) and the mean difference in EQ-5D™ utility persisted over time.

CONCLUSION

The present study provides the first synthesized estimate of SSI burden over the short and long term. EQ-5D™ utility estimates for a range of SSIs are essential for infection prevention planning and future economic modelling.

Optimal timing for antimicrobial prophylaxis to reduce surgical site infections: a retrospective analysis of 531 patients

It has been revealed that the administration of an antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) reduces the rate of surgical site (SSI) following colorectal cancer surgery. Nevertheless, the optimal timing of this medication remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine more precisely the optimal time for administering antibiotics and to see if this could reduce the number of possible surgical site infections. The files of individuals who underwent colorectal cancer surgery at the University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel (Germany) between 2009 and 2017 were analyzed. Piperacillin/tazobactam, cefuroxime/metronidazole and mezlocillin/sulbactam were administered as AP regimens. Timing of AP was obtained. The primary objective was the rate of SSIs based on CDC criteria. Multivariate analysis took place to identify risk factors for SSIs. A total of 326 patients (61.4%) received an AP within 30 min, 166 (31.3%) between 30 and 60 min, 22 (4.1%) more than 1 h before surgery, and 15 (2.8%) after surgery. In 19 cases (3.6%) a SSI occurred during hospital stay. A multivariate analysis did not identify AP timing as a risk factor for the occurrence of SSIs. With significance, more surgical site occurrences (SSO) were diagnosed when cefuroxime/metronidazole was given. Our results suggest that AP with cefuroxime/metronidazole is less effective in reducing SSO compared with mezlocillin/sulbactam and tazobactam/piperacillin. We assume that the timing of this AP regimen of < 30 min or 30-60 min prior to colorectal surgery does not impact the SSI rate.

Evaluation of the role of povidone‑iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections

Background

The occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) is associated with increased risk of mortality, development of other infections, and the need for reintervention, posing a significant health burden. The aim of this review was to examine the current data and guidelines around the use of antiseptic povidone‑iodine (PVP-I) for the prevention of SSIs at each stage of surgical intervention.

Methods

A literature search for selected key words was performed using PubMed. Additional papers were identified based on author expertise.

Results

Scientific evidence demonstrates that PVP-I can be used at every stage of surgical intervention: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative. PVP-I is one of the most widely used antiseptics on healthy skin and mucous membranes for preoperative surgical site preparation and is associated with a low SSI rate. For intraoperative irrigation, aqueous PVP-I is the recommended agent and has been demonstrated to decrease SSIs in a range of surgical settings, and for postoperative wound healing, there is a growing body of evidence to support the use of PVP-I.

Conclusions

There is a need for more stringent study designs in clinical trials to enable meaningful comparisons between antiseptic agents, particularly for preoperative skin preparation. The use of a single agent (PVP-I) at each stage of surgical intervention could potentially provide advantages, including economic benefits, over agents that can only be used at discrete stages of the surgical procedure.

Key message

Evidence supports the use of PVP-I at all stages of surgical intervention, from preoperative measures (including skin preparation, preoperative washing, and nasal decolonization) to intraoperative irrigation, through to postoperative wound management. However, there is a need for more stringent study designs in clinical trials to enable meaningful comparisons between antiseptic agents, particularly for preoperative skin preparation.

Antibiotic Utilization Patterns for Different Wound Types among Surgical Patients: Findings and Implications

Antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) post-operatively. However, there are concerns with the extent of prophylaxis post-operatively, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a key issue in Pakistan. Consequently, we conducted an observational cross-sectional study on 583 patients undergoing surgery at a leading teaching hospital in Pakistan with respect to the choice, time and duration of antimicrobials to prevent SSIs. The identified variables included post-operative prophylactic antimicrobials given to all patients for all surgical procedures. In addition, cephalosporins were frequently used for all surgical procedures, and among these, the use of third-generation cephalosporins was common. The duration of post-operative prophylaxis was 3-4 days, appreciably longer than the suggestions of the guidelines, with most patients prescribed antimicrobials until discharge. The inappropriate choice of antimicrobials combined with prolonged post-operative antibiotic administration need to be addressed. This includes appropriate interventions, such as antimicrobial stewardship programs, which have been successful in other LMICs to improve antibiotic utilization associated with SSIs and to reduce AMR.

Developing a Modeling Framework for Quantifying the Health and Cost Implications of Antibiotic Resistance for Surgical Procedures

Background. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health threat. The wider implications of AMR, such as the impact of antibiotic resistance (ABR) on surgical procedures, are yet to be quantified. The objective of this study was to produce a conceptual modeling framework to provide a basis for estimating the current and potential future consequences of ABR for surgical procedures in England. Design. A framework was developed using literature-based evidence and structured expert elicitation. This was applied to populations undergoing emergency repair of the neck of the femur and elective colorectal resection surgery. Results. The framework captures the implications of increasing ABR by allowing for higher rates of surgical site infection (SSI) as the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis wanes and worsened outcomes following SSIs to reflect reduced antibiotic treatment effectiveness. The expert elicitation highlights the uncertainty in quantifying the impact of ABR, reflected in the results. A hypothetical SSI rate increase of 14% in a person undergoing emergency repair of the femur could increase costs by 39% (-2% to 108% credible interval [CI]) and decrease quality-adjusted life-years by 11% (0.4% to 62% CI) over 15 y. Conclusions. The modeling framework is a starting point for addressing the implication of ABR on the outcomes and costs of surgeries. Due to clinical uncertainty highlighted in the expert elicitation process, the numerical outputs of the case studies should not be focused on but rather the framework itself, illustration of the evidence gaps, the benefit of expert elicitation in quantifying parameters with limited data, and the potential magnitude of the impact of ABR on surgical procedures. Implications. The framework can be used to support research surrounding the health and cost burden of ABR in England.

Highlights

The modeling framework is a starting point for assessing the health and cost impacts of antibiotic resistance on surgeries in England.Formulating a framework and synthesizing evidence to parameterize data gaps provides targets for future research.Once data gaps are addressed, this modeling framework can be used to feed into overall estimates of the health and cost burden of antibiotic resistance and evaluate control policies.

Analysis of Italian requests for compensation in cases of responsibility for healthcare-related infections: A retrospective study

Introduction

The aim of this study was to examine the type of compensation claims for alleged medical malpractice in the field of healthcare-related infections in Italy.

Methods

It was analyzed which was the most frequent clinical context, the characteristics of the disputes established, which were the alleged damages most often complained of, which were the possibly censurable behaviors of the health professionals, and which were the reasons for acceptance or rejection of the request for compensation.

Results

In 90.2%, the issue questioned regarded surgical site infections. The most common pathogens involved were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (34.1%) and Staphylococcus aureus (24.4%). The lack or non-adherence to protocols of prophylaxis and/or prevention of healthcare-related infections was the most reported cause of acceptance of the request of compensation.

Discussion

According to our data, a stronger effort should be made in terms of risk management perspective in order to ensure the develop and application of protocols for prevention of Gram-positive healthcare-related infections and strengthen infection control and antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Risk and economic burden of surgical site infection following spinal fusion in adults

BACKGROUND

Spinal fusion surgery (SFS) is one of the most common operations in the United States, >450,000 SFSs are performed annually, incurring annual costs >$10 billion.

OBJECTIVES

We used a nationwide longitudinal database to accurately assess incidence and payments associated with management of postoperative infection following SFS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort analysis of 210,019 patients undergoing SFS from 2014 to 2018 using IBM MarketScan commercial and Medicaid-Medicare databases. We assessed rates of superficial/deep incisional SSIs, from 3 to 180 days after surgery using Cox proportional hazard regression models. To evaluate adjusted payments for patients with/without SSIs, adjusted for inflation to 2019 Consumer Price Index, we used generalized linear regression models with log-link and γ distribution.

RESULTS

Overall, 6.6% of patients experienced an SSI, 1.7% superficial SSIs and 4.9% deep-incisional SSIs, with a median of 44 days to presentation for superficial SSIs and 28 days for deep-incisional SSIs. Selective risk factors included surgical approach, admission type, payer, and higher comorbidity score. Postoperative incremental commercial payments for patients with superficial SSI were $20,800 at 6 months, $26,937 at 12 months, and $32,821 at 24 months; incremental payments for patients with deep-incisional SSI were $59,766 at 6 months, $74,875 at 12 months, and $93,741 at 24 months. Corresponding incremental Medicare payments for patients with superficial incisional at 6, 12, 24-months were $11,044, $17,967, and $24,096; while payments for patients with deep-infection were: $48,662, $53,757, and $73,803 at 6, 12, 24-months.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a 4.9% rate of deep infection following SFS, with substantial payer burden. The findings suggest that the implementation of robust evidence-based surgical-care bundles to mitigate postoperative SFS infection is warranted.

The Association Between Hospital Financial Performance and the Quality of Care - A Scoping Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Improving the quality of hospital care is an important policy objective. Hospitals operate under pressure to contain costs and might face challenges related to financial deficits. The objective of this paper was to identify and map the available evidence on the association between hospital financial performance (FP) and quality of care (Q).

METHODS

A scoping review was performed. Searches were conducted in 7 databases: Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, EconLit, ABI/INFORM, and Business Source Complete. The search strategy combined multiple terms from 3 topics: hospital AND FP AND Q. The collected data were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods.

RESULTS

10 503 records were screened and 151 full text papers analysed. A total of 69 papers were included (60 empirical, 2 theoretical, 5 literature reviews, and 2 dissertations). The majority of identified studies were published within the last decade (2010-2021). Most empirical studies had been conducted in the United States (55/60), used cross-sectional approaches (32/60) and applied diverse regression models with FP measures as dependent variables, thus measuring the impact of Q on hospitals FP (34/60). The comparability of the studies' results is limited due to differences in applied methods and settings. Yet, the general overview shows that in almost half of the cases the association between hospital FP and Q was positive, while no study showed a clear negative association.

CONCLUSION

This scoping review provides an overview of the available literature on the association between hospital FP and Q. The results highlight numerous research gaps: (1) systematic reviews and meta-analyses of existing studies with similar measures of FP and Q are unavailable, (2) further methodological/conceptual work is needed on the metrics measuring hospital FP and Q, and (3) more empirical studies should analyse the association between FP and Q in non-US healthcare settings.

Ambulatory negative pressure wound therapy of subcutaneous abdominal wounds after surgery: results of the SAWHI randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The SAWHI study showed that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) reduced treatment time by 7.8 days and had a 20.2% higher wound closure rate, but required a 2.1-day longer hospital stay than conventional wound treatment (CWT). The majority of study participants began treatment in the hospital and were discharged within 42 days.

METHODS

As an add-on to a multicenter randomized clinical trial, selected aspects of hospital discharge, outpatient treatment continuation, and subsequent wound closure outcomes are compared between the treatment arms in patients with subcutaneous abdominal wound healing impairment after surgery without fascia dehiscence in the per protocol population.

RESULTS

Within 42 days, wound closure rates were higher for outpatients in the NPWT arm than for outpatients in the CWT arm (27 of 55 [49.1%]) for both outpatient continuation of NPWT (8 of 26 [30.8%]) and outpatient CWT after NPWT was finished (27 of 121 [22.3%]). Time to wound closure was shorter for outpatients in the NPWT arm (outpatient transfer with: NPWT Mean ± standard error 28.8 ± 8.0 days; CWT 28.9 ± 9.5 days) than in the conventional treatment arm (30.4 ± 8.0 days). Nevertheless, within 30 study sites with patient enrollment, outpatient NPWT was performed in only 20 study sites for 65 of 157 study participants in the treatment arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient NPWT of postsurgical abdominal wounds with healing impairment is feasible and successful and should be encouraged whenever possible. Study site specific avoidance of outpatient NPWT emerges as an additional reason for the prolonged hospitalization time. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01528033. Date of registration: February 7, 2012, retrospectively registered.

Healthcare resource use and costs related to surgical infections of tibial fractures in a Spanish cohort

Surgical site infection constitutes a serious complication in the healing process of bone fractures and has been associated with increases in medical resource use and healthcare costs. This study evaluates the economic impact of surgical site infection in tibial fractures in a Spanish cohort. It is a retrospective, single-centre, comparative cohort study of patients with tibial fractures with longitudinal follow-up for up to 18 months post-surgery. Included patients (n = 325) were adults, with tibial fracture, either isolated or polyfracture, or polytrauma with an Injury Severity Score >15. Patients had been surgically treated within 30 days of the tibial fracture by external or internal fixation, or external followed by internal fixation. Most patients (84.9%) had an American Society of Anaesthesiology score of 1–2. 20% of the patients had one open tibial fracture, 12.3% had polytrauma, and 20% had multiple fractures. Most patients were treated with a nail (41.8%) or a plate (33.8%). 56 patients (17.2%) developed surgical site infection. Patients with infection had significantly higher hospital length of stay (34.9 vs 12.0 days; p<0.001; +191%), readmissions (1.21 vs 0.25; p<0.001; +380%) and mean operating theatre time (499 vs 219 min; p<0.001; +128%) than patients without infection. Mean length of stay in intensive care did not significantly increase with infection (2.8 vs 1.7 days; p = 0.25). Total in-hospital costs for patients with infection increased from €7,607 to €17,538 (p<0.001; +131%). Overall, infections were associated with significantly increased healthcare resource use and costs. Preventive strategies to avoid infections could lead to substantial cost savings.

No impact of sex on surgical site infections in abdominal surgery: a multi-center study

OBJECTIVE

Male sex is controversially discussed as a risk factor for surgical site infections (SSI). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of sex on SSI in abdominal surgery under elimination of relevant confounders.

METHODS

Clinicopathological data of 6603 patients undergoing abdominal surgery from a multi-center prospective database of four Swiss hospitals including patients between 2015 and 2018 were assessed. Patients were stratified according to postoperative SSI and risk factors for SSI were identified using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

In 649 of 6603 patients, SSI was reported (9.8%). SSI was significantly associated with reoperation (22.7% vs. 3.4%, p < 0.001), increased mortality rate (4.6% vs. 0.9%, p < 0.001), and increased rate of length of hospital stay > 75th percentile (57.0% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, male sex was a significant risk factor for SSI (p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis including multiple confounders' such as comorbidities and perioperative factors, there was no association between male sex and risk of SSI (odds ratio (OR) 1.1 [CI 0.8-1.4]). Independent risk factors for SSI in multivariate analysis were BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² (OR 1.8 [CI 1.3-2.3]), duration of surgery > 75th percentile (OR 2.3 [1.8-2.9]), high contamination level (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.6]), laparotomy (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.7]), previous laparotomy (OR 1.4 [1.1-1.7]), blood transfusion (OR 1.7 [1.2-2.4]), cancer (OR 1.3 [1.0-1.8] and malnutrition (OR 2.5 [1.8-3.4]).

CONCLUSION

Under elimination of relevant confounders, there is no significant correlation between sex and risk of SSI after abdominal surgery.

Nosocomial Extracardiac Infections After Cardiac Surgery

Purpose of Review

Nosocomial extracardiac infections after cardiac surgery are a major public health issue affecting 3–8.2% of patients within 30–60 days following the intervention.

Recent Findings

Here, we have considered the most important postoperative infective complications that, in order of frequency, are pneumonia, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, and bloodstream infection. The overall picture that emerges shows that they cause a greater perioperative morbidity and mortality with a longer hospitalization time and excess costs. Preventive interventions and corrective measures, diminishing the burden of nosocomial extracardiac infections, may reduce the global costs. A multidisciplinary team may assure a more appropriate management of nosocomial extracardiac infections leading to a reduction of hospitalization time and mortality rate.

Summary

The main and most current data on epidemiology, prevention, microbiology, diagnosis, and management for each one of the most important postoperative infective complications are reported. The establishment of an antimicrobial stewardship in each hospital seems to be, at the moment, the more valid strategy to counteract the challenging problems.

PreciSSIon - a collaborative initiative to reduce surgical site infection after elective colorectal surgery

AIM

Surgical site infection (SSI) is common after colorectal surgery but most hospitals do not know their SSI rates. Approximately half of SSI occur after discharge and post-discharge surveillance is needed for accurate measurement. Peri-operative care bundles are known to reduce SSI. PreciSSion is a collaboration between seven hospitals in the West of England. The aims were to establish reliable SSI measurement after elective colorectal surgery using 30-day patient-reported outcome measures and to implement an evidence-based 4-point care bundle that had already demonstrated a reduction in SSI in a local hospital. The bundle included: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation, a second dose of antibiotic after 4 hours, use of a dual-ring wound protector and antibacterial sutures for abdominal wall closure.

METHOD

30-day patient-reported SSI was undertaken using the Public Health England Questionnaire and response rates recorded. Baseline SSI was measured during November 2019 - May 2020 and continued after implementation of the care bundle until March 2021. Bundle compliance was also measured.

RESULTS

Average questionnaire response rate was 81%. Average compliance was 92%, 96%, 79% and 85% for each element of the bundle respectively. Baseline SSI was 8-30%. Six of seven hospitals reduced SSI and the regional average SSI rate almost halved from 18% (1447 patients) to 9.5% (1247 patients).

CONCLUSION

We have demonstrated that a care bundle developed in a single hospital can be adopted and spread and the reduction in SSI after elective colorectal surgery can be replicated in other hospitals and deliver results within 18 months.

Peri-Operative Method of Applying Chlorhexidine and Iodine as Skin Preparation Solutions: Does It Matter? A Literature Review

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is an adverse event that can lead to increased pain, increased cost, risk of death, and decreased patient satisfaction. Studies have investigated the best solutions to prevent SSI. Chlorhexidine has been suggested as the most efficacious antiseptic. However, scant data exist on application of antiseptic solutions and effectiveness of concentric versus back-and-forth strokes. Because a specific method may result in better outcomes, we aimed to review the literature to compare these two techniques. Methods: PubMed-indexed articles were reviewed using specific keywords, including "back-and-forth," "concentric circle," "chlorhexidine," "iodine," "surgical site infection," "antiseptic," and "skin preparation." Because data showing the correlation between SSI and application method of skin preparation solutions were scant, studies that described skin preparation method but analyzed other types of infection, bacteremia, or colonization were also included in this review. Results: No consensus was found regarding the application method. Two articles showed the superiority of chlorhexidine applied using the back-and-forth technique, whereas one demonstrated the superiority of iodine applied in concentric circles. Conclusions: The method of applying antiseptic solution may be just as important as the choice of solution. More studies are needed to assess method of antiseptic application.