Adherence of nurses to annual seasonal influenza vaccination over a 5-year period

Socioeconomic, health-related, and primary care physician characteristics associated with adherence to seasonal influenza vaccination in Manitoba, Canada: A population-wide record-linkage cohort study

OBJECTIVE

There is a lack of published evidence on factors associated with adherence (maintenance of cumulative vaccination) to seasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) in Manitoba, Canada. We sought to assess the associations.

METHODS

A cohort study utilizing Manitoba administrative health databases. Participants received SIV in 2010/11 influenza season, remained registered Manitoba residents and received at least one SIV during the 2011/12‒2019/20 seasons. We dichotomized adherence into "more adherent" (6‒9 SIVs) and "less adherent" (1‒5 SIVs) and used multivariable adjusted generalized estimating equation logistic regression models to assess association between adherence and socioeconomic, health-related, and primary care physician (PCP) characteristics, stratified by age group (< 5, 5‒17, 18‒44, 45‒64, ≥ 65) and sex. Results are adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

There were 152,493 participants. Males had lower odds of being more adherent except among ≥ 65-year-olds (1.03, 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). Compared with the lowest income quintile, those in higher income quintiles had higher odds of being more adherent. The odds mostly increased with increase in income quintile. Those with more contact with their PCP/hospitalization one year prior had higher odds of being more adherent. The odds increased with increased contact among those 18‒44, 45‒64 and ≥ 65 years old. Those who had PCP with more years of practice had higher odds of being more adherent. The odds increased as years of practice increased. These observations were mostly consistent irrespective of sex.

CONCLUSION

Female gender, having higher income, having more contact with the health system, and having an experienced PCP may determine increased adherence to SIV in Manitoba. These findings require attention.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Influenza Vaccination Coverage of Healthcare Personnel in Alicante, Spain

Influenza is a health problem and vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent it. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccination coverage (VC) against influenza in healthcare workers (HCWs). A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dr. Balmis University General Hospital in the province of Alicante (Spain), in which vaccination data were collected retrospectively. Adverse effects (AEs) were detected via telephone call between 15 and 30 days after vaccination. The existence of significant changes in VC between the different seasons studied was evaluated using Chi square with a statistical significance level of p < 0.05. A total of 8403 HCWs vaccinated throughout the different seasons were studied. The vaccination coverage of HCWs for influenza pre-COVID-19 pandemic (2019/20 season) was 51.9%; increased during the pandemic to 67.9% (2020/21 season) and 65.5% (2021/22 season); and, after the pandemic, it decreased to 42.7% (2022/23 season) (p < 0.05). The most frequent reason for vaccination during the periods evaluated was "self-protection", followed by "protection of patients" and "protection of family members". Of all HCWs evaluated, 26.6% (1460/5493) reported at least one AE. During the COVID-19 pandemic, HCWs' influenza vaccination coverage fluctuated considerably. There has been an increase in VC during the most critical moments of the pandemic, both in the 2020/21 and 2021/22 seasons, which has, subsequently, decreased in the 2022/2023 season, to levels below pre-pandemic (2019/2020 season), which justifies implementing specific measures to recover VC in Spain.

A systematic review of barriers and enablers associated with uptake of influenza vaccine among care home staff

Barriers and enablers to vaccination of care home (CH) staff should be identified in order to develop interventions to address them that increase uptake and protect residents. We aimed to synthesis the evidence describing the barriers and enablers that affect the influenza vaccination uptake of care home (CH) staff.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, IBSS, SCOPUS to identify quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies. Data related to health or social care workers in CHs reported barriers or enablers were extracted and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the data within each domain were grouped and categorized into key factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff.

RESULTS

We screened 4025 studies; 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (81 %) were surveys. Five theoretical domains were frequently reported as mediators of influenza vaccine uptake: Beliefs about consequences (32 studies), Environmental context and resources (30 studies), Emotions (26 studies), Social influences (25 studies), Knowledge (22 studies). The low acceptance rate of the influenza vaccine among CH staff can be attributed to multiple factors, including insufficient understanding of the vaccine, its efficacy, or misconceptions about the vaccine (knowledge), perceiving the vaccine as ineffective and unsafe (beliefs about consequences), fear of influenza vaccine and its side effects (emotions), and experiencing limited accessibility to the vaccine (environmental context and resources).

CONCLUSION

Interventions aimed at increasing influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff should focus on addressing the barriers identified in this review. These interventions should include components such as enhancing knowledge by providing accurate information about vaccine benefits and safety, addressing negative beliefs by challenging misconceptions, managing concerns and fears through open communication, and improving accessibility to the vaccine through convenient on-site options. This review provides a foundation for the development of tailored Interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff.

Effect of prior outbreak work experience to future outbreak responses for nurses in Hong Kong: A cross-sectional study

Background

During the early phase of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, health care workers had elevated levels of psychological distress. Historical exposure to disease outbreak may shape different pandemic responses among experienced health care workers.

Aim

Considering the unique experience of the 2003 SARS outbreak in Hong Kong, this study examined the association between prior epidemic work experience and anxiety levels, and the mediating role of perceived severity of COVID-19 and SARS in nurses.

Methods

In March 2020, a cross-sectional survey targeting practising nurses in Hong Kong was conducted during the early phase of the COVID-19 epidemic. The interrelationships among participants' work experience during the SARS outbreak, perceived severity of SARS and COVID-19, and anxiety level were elucidated using structural equation model (SEM).

Findings

Of 1,061 eligible nurses, a majority were female (90%) with a median age of 39 years (IQR = 32-49). A significant and negative indirect association was identified between SARS experience and anxiety levels (B=-0.04, p=0.04) in the SEM with a satisfactory fitness (CFI=0.95; RMSEA=0.06). SARS-experienced nurses perceived SARS to be less severe (B=-0.17, p=0.01), translated an equivalent perception to COVID-19 (B=1.29, p<0.001) and resulted in a lower level of anxiety (B=0.19, p<0.001).

Conclusions

The less vigorous perception towards the severity of SARS and COVID-19 may explain SARS-experienced nurses' less initial epidemic-induced anxiety. The possible role of outbreak-experienced nurses in supporting outbreak-inexperienced nurses, both emotionally and technically, should be considered when an epidemic commences. Interventions aiming to facilitate the understanding of emerging virus should also be in place.

Association of Receiving a Fourth Dose of the BNT162b Vaccine With SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Workers in Israel

IMPORTANCE

Despite the high 3-dose vaccination rate among health care workers (HCWs) in Israel, a high rate of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections in this group was observed during the Omicron wave. As a result, the Israeli Ministry of Health decided to recommend a fourth vaccine dose to medical staff.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the benefit of a fourth BNT162b2 vaccine dose on the breakthrough infection rate among HCWs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This multicenter cohort study was performed in January 2022, the first month of the 4-dose vaccination campaign, during a surge of the Omicron variant wave. All health care workers at 11 general hospitals in Israel who had been vaccinated with 3 doses up to September 30, 2021, and had not contracted COVID-19 before the vaccination campaign were included.

EXPOSURES

Vaccination with a fourth dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine during January 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Breakthrough COVID-19 infections in 4-dose recipients vs 3-dose recipients measured by a polymerase chain reaction test result positive for SARS-CoV-2. Health care workers were tested based on symptoms or exposure.

RESULTS

A total of 29 611 Israeli HCWs (19 381 [65%] female; mean [SD] age, 44 [12] years) had received 3 vaccine doses between August and September 2021; of these, 5331 (18%) received the fourth dose in January 2022 and were not infected by the first week after vaccination. Overall breakthrough infection rates were 368 of 5331 (7%) in the 4-dose group and 4802 of 24280 (20%) in the 3-dose group (relative risk, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.32-0.39). Similar reductions were found in a matched analysis by the exact day of receiving the third vaccine (relative risk, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71) and in a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards regression model (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.50-0.63). In both groups, no severe disease or death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, the fourth BNT162b2 vaccine dose resulted in a reduced breakthrough infection rate among hospital staff. This reduction was lower than that observed after the third dose; nevertheless, considering the high infectivity of the Omicron variant, which led to critical medical staff shortages, a fourth vaccine dose should be considered to mitigate the infection rate among HCWs.

The double-edged impacts of COVID-19 epidemic on influenza vaccination uptake in nurses in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted influenza seasonality and impacted influenza vaccination behaviours. This study examines the patterns of influenza vaccination uptake in nurses during the pre-pandemic seasons and amidst the pandemic in 2020/21 in subtropical Hong Kong.

METHODS

In April 2021, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in practising and student nurses. Six patterns were differentiated by their influenza vaccination status in 2020/21 and preceding five seasons: (a) resistance throughout, (b) negative change, (c) decreased tendency, (d) increased tendency (e) positive change, and (f) adherence throughout. Participants' characteristics and reasons for vaccination/non-vaccination and their associations with each vaccination pattern were explored using multivariable multinomial regression.

RESULTS

Among 1323 nurses (88% female with a median age of 39 years), no substantial change in vaccination uptake was noted from 2019/20 (41%) to 2020/21 (42%). Some 4% were positive-changers who were older at age of ≥50 years (aOR 4.77) and more likely to anticipate a reduced risk of severe disease with COVID-19/influenza co-infection following vaccination (aOR 8.76). Negative-changers made up 3% and were more inclined to perceive an unlikelihood of widespread influenza outbreaks amidst the pandemic (aOR 3.67). Some 26 and 43% remained adherent and resistant to influenza vaccination throughout respectively notwithstanding the COVID-19 outbreak.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the increased uptake elsewhere, the stable influenza vaccination coverage among nurses in Hong Kong could be explained by the ubiquity of strict physical distancing regulations, which have deterred vaccination in some nurses that offsets the new uptakes induced by the mild COVID-19 outbreaks.