A Prospective Comparison of Diagnostic Tools for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nerve entrapment disorder worldwide. The epidemiology and risk factors, including family burden, for developing CTS are multi-factorial. Despite much research, its intricate pathophysiological mechanism(s) are not fully understood. An underlying subclinical neuropathy may indicate an increased susceptibility to developing CTS. Although surgery is often performed for CTS, clear international guidelines to indicate when to perform non-surgical or surgical treatment, based on stage and severity of CTS, remain to be elucidated. Neurophysiological examination, using electrophysiology or ultrasonography, performed in certain circumstances, should correlate with the history and findings in clinical examination of the person with CTS. History and clinical examination are particularly relevant globally owing to lack of other equipment. Various instruments are used to assess CTS and treatment outcomes as well as the effect of the disorder on quality of life. The surgical treatment options of CTS - open or endoscopic - offer an effective solution to mitigate functional impairments and pain. However, there are risks of post-operative persistent or recurrent symptoms, requiring meticulous diagnostic re-evaluation before any additional surgery. Health-care professionals should have increased awareness about CTS and all its implications. Future considerations of CTS include use of linked national registries to understand risk factors, explore possible screening methods, and evaluate diagnosis and treatment with a broader perspective beyond surgery, including psychological well-being.

Characteristics of Patients with Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome but Negative Diagnostic Testing

Background

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a clinical diagnosis involving numerous confirmatory diagnostic tools, including patient questionnaires, ultrasound (US), and electrodiagnostic studies (EDX.) Patients may experience clinical symptoms of CTS with false negative diagnostic testing. The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics of patients with clinical symptoms of CTS with negative diagnostic testing.

Methods

An existing database of 295 hands containing the six-item CTS-6, US of the median nerve, and EDX was queried. Patients with symptoms of carpal tunnel scoring 12.5 or higher on CTS-6 were sorted into those with all positive testing or negative testing.

Results

In 60 patients, 103 hands had both positive US and EDX and a CTS-6 of 12.5 or higher. Twenty-nine hands in 25 patients had a CTS-6 of 12.5 or higher and both negative ultrasound and EDX. There was a significantly younger average age of 43 (P = 0.007) and lower average BMI of 28 (P < 0.0001) of patients in the negative diagnostic study group, compared with the average age of 53, and a body mass index (BMI) of 34 in the positive diagnostic study.

Conclusions

In this series, patients with symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome and negative diagnostic studies were on average younger and had a lower BMI. These patients may warrant more careful consideration of CTS clinical diagnosis and counseling regarding a higher risk of false-negative confirmatory testing. Further studies are needed to determine possible effects of age and BMI on electrodiagnostic studies and ultrasound testing in CTS.

The Diagnostic Utility of Ultrasound and Electrodiagnostic Studies in The Young and Old

Purpose

Carpal tunnel syndrome is the most common compressive neuropathy. The diagnostic parameters currently used for the general adult population may not be valid in elderly or younger cohorts. The purpose of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of nerve conduction studies (NCS) and ultrasound (US) in different age groups utilizing the 6-item Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) symptoms scale (CTS-6) as the reference standard.

Methods

A retrospective database of patients who underwent US and NCS as part of the diagnostic work-up for suspected peripheral nerve compression was reviewed. Subjects were separated into three groups based on the median age of carpal tunnel syndrome patients (55 years of age) and two standard deviations (standard deviation 13.5 years) above and below the median. The young group was 28 years of age or less, the middle group was 29-71 years of age, and the old group was 72 years of age or greater. CTS-6 and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire scores were recorded. Using CTS-6 as a reference standard, the sensitivity and specificity were calculated for NCS and US.

Results

A total of 295 hands were included in the analysis with 23 hands in the young group and 24 hands in the old group. NCS showed 31% sensitivity and 100% specificity in the young group compared to 54% sensitivity and 90% specificity for US. NCS showed 94% sensitivity and 25% specificity in the old group compared to 81% sensitivity and 38% specificity for US. Overall accuracy for US and NCS was 66% for both tests when looking at all age groups. The accuracy in the young group was 70% for US and 61% for NCS, whereas the accuracy in the old group was 67% for US and 71% for NCS.

Conclusions

US has comparable sensitivity and specificity to NCS in patients two or more standard deviations above or below the mean age for presentation of CTS. US may be more accurate in younger patients, although NCS limits the number of false positive tests. There remains a substantial amount of inaccuracy for both tests when using a validated clinical diagnostic tool (CTS-6) as the reference standard.

Type of study/level of Evidence

Diagnostic IV.

Point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 to diagnose idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of our new diagnostic chart using point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 for diagnosing idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of patients who visited our department and received point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 from 2020 to 2023. Data regarding age, sex, initial and final diagnosis, cross-sectional area of the median nerve, CTS-6 score, and electrodiagnostic severity were obtained and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 177 wrists included in our study, 138 (78 %) were diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome, while 39 (22 %) were not (non-carpal tunnel syndrome). With our diagnostic method, 127 wrists (72 %) were diagnosed initially with carpal tunnel syndrome, 23 wrists (13 %) with non-carpal tunnel syndrome, and the rest 27 wrists (15 %) as borderline. Our initial diagnoses of carpal tunnel syndrome and non-carpal tunnel syndrome were maintained in all cases except for two. Cross-sectional area, CTS-6 score, and electrodiagnostic severity showed a positive correlation. A post hoc analysis showed that the new scoring system (CTS-6 score + 2 × cross-sectional area) with a cutoff value of 31.25 points showed a sensitivity as high as 95 % and a specificity of 100 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that most suspected idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome cases can be diagnosed correctly using the diagnostic chart. Although additional tools, including electrodiagnostic studies, may be needed for borderline cases, the use of point of care ultrasound combined with CTS-6 may be a recommendable first-line confirmatory test because point of care ultrasound and CTS-6 could be complementary tools, and this chart may be especially beneficial for atypical or outlier cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

Rasch analysis of the carpal tunnel syndrome instrument

BACKGROUND

The carpal tunnel syndrome instrument (CTSI) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). However, CTSI is an ordinal-type questionnaire and might have caused misinterpretations of the PROM between surgical outcomes of CTS (Camitz and extra/open carpal tunnel release).

PURPOSE

This study aims to convert the CTSI to an interval scale using Rasch analysis (RA) and evaluate the outcome differences between the original and transformed scales.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective control study.

METHODS

Four hundred twenty-four patients with 567 CTSs had been interviewed for CTSI perioperatively and treated with either endoscopic/open carpal tunnel release or Camitz tendon transfer. Each CTSI was analyzed for dimensionality, fit statistics, and a transformation of the ordinal-to-interval scale by RA. We compared the two groups perioperative scores of three CTSI versions (original 11-item, modified 8-item, and transformed 8-item).

RESULTS

Based on the RA, the original CTSI was not unidimensional. We identified two dimensions. After removing misfit items, the perioperative course of each score by three versions of each dimension was compared (Repeated 2-factor analysis of variance). The transformed interval scales of CTSI provided different assessments of score changes from the ordinal scale of CTSI analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Original CTSI consisted of ordinal scale items that yielded different conclusions than scores converted to interval scale by Rasch analysis. CTSI should convert into an interval scale after reclassifying dimensionality by Latent Factor Analysis and removing misfit items.

Use of nerve conduction studies in carpal tunnel syndrome

This review article examines the use of nerve conduction studies in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. These studies should be understood not as a test that determines the diagnosis but as a measure of impaired nerve function. They are sensitive indicators of local demyelination and axonal loss that can detect and quantify these changes before the appearance of clinical signs, providing information that cannot be obtained with the unaided senses of the physician, nor by any other investigation. They are the best available indicator of overall disease severity, correlating with symptoms and anatomical change in the median nerve. They have some prognostic value for surgical outcome and are sufficiently sensitive to change for the evaluation of treatment response. When surgery does not yield the expected improvement in symptoms, they can help to establish whether decompression has been achieved provided preoperative results are available for comparison.

Progression From Steroid Injection to Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients With Concurrent Ulnar Nerve Compression: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

Steroid injections are a common treatment option in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). This study assesses various prognostic factors for progression to carpal tunnel release (CTR) after a first-time steroid injection for CTS with specific focus on concomitant ulnar nerve compression (UNC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 426 hands with CTS treated with a first-time steroid injection in the Long Island region of New York. The main predictor variable was UNC measured in two analytical models of positive UNC and location of UNC (wrist or elbow). Multivariate logistic regression analyses adjusted for demographic, medical, and CTS-related variables for 2 study outcomes occurring within 1 year: (1) CTR; and (2) steroid reinjection.

RESULTS

Overall progression to CTR within 1 year of steroid injection was 23.0%. Ulnar nerve compression was present in 16.7% of patients and was significantly associated with increased odds for CTR but not with steroid reinjection. These results were further localized to be specific for UNC at the elbow. A moderate or severe result on electrodiagnostic studies was associated with increased odds for CTR. Increased age was associated with slightly increased odds of steroid reinjection while a history of distal radius fracture was associated with decreased odds of steroid reinjection.

CONCLUSIONS

Carpal tunnel syndrome patients with UNC may benefit from earlier definitive treatment with CTR rather than attempting steroid injections, as they are more likely to seek reintervention within 1 year of their initial injection.

Sonographic reference values for median nerve cross-sectional area: A meta-analysis of data from healthy individuals

Objective

Establish median nerve CSA reference values and identify patient-level factors impacting diagnostic thresholds.

Methods

Studies were identified through a robust search of multiple databases, and quality assessment was conducted using a modified version of the National Institute of Health Study Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. A meta-analysis was performed to identify normative values stratified by anatomic location. A meta-regression was conducted to examine heterogeneity effects of age, sex, and laterality.

Results

The meta-analysis included 73 studies; 41 (56.2%) were high quality. The median nerve CSA [95% CI] was 6.46mm2 [6.09-6.84], 8.68mm2 [8.22-9.13], and 8.60mm2 [8.23-8.97] at the proximal forearm, the carpal tunnel inlet, and the proximal carpal tunnel, respectively. Age was positively associated with CSA at the level of proximal carpal tunnel (β=0.03mm2, p=0.047). Men (9.42mm2, [8.06-10.78]) had statistically larger proximal tunnel CSA (p = 0.03) as compared to women (7.71mm2, [7.01-8.42]). No difference was noted in laterality.

Conclusion

A reference value for median nerve CSA in the carpal tunnel is 8.60mm2. Adjustments may be required in pediatrics or older adults. The diagnostic threshold of 10.0mm2 for male patients should be cautiously applied as the upper limit of normative averages surpasses this threshold.

The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Lack of a reliable reference standard for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis could impact the diagnostic test characteristics. This systematic review sought to evaluate differences in the accuracy of CTS diagnostic modalities based on the reference standard used.

Methods

A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines to investigate diagnostic modalities used in CTS. A literature search of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Reviews was conducted for the years of 2010-2021 for primary data, and 113 studies met final inclusion criteria. Studies were stratified based on the reference standard utilized and diagnostic modality assessed, and the weighted means of the sensitivities and specificities were calculated.

Results

Thirty-five studies used clinical diagnosis alone as a reference standard, and 78 studies used electrodiagnostic study (EDS). The specificity for MRI and ultrasound (US) were substantially lower when EDS was used as the reference standard. MRI was the test most affected by the reference standard used, showing increased sensitivity when using EDS as the reference compared to clinical diagnosis (77.1% versus 60.9%) and decreased specificity (87.6% versus 99.2%). Regardless of the reference standard used, all tests had anticipated false-positive and/or false-negative rates of at least 10%.

Conclusions

Testing characteristics vary greatly based on the choice of reference standard, with the sensitivity of MRI most affected. Regardless of reference standard used, EDS, US, and MRI each had false-positive and/or false-negative rates too great to be appropriate for use as a screening examination.

Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Provocative Maneuvers for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to summarize and evaluate the research on the accuracy of provocative maneuvers to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

METHODS

The MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Embase databases were searched, and studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of at least 1 provocative test for CTS were selected. Study characteristics and data about the diagnostic accuracy of the provocative tests for CTS were extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis of the sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) of the Phalen test and Tinel sign was conducted. The risk of bias (ROB) was rated using the QUADAS-2 tool.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies that assessed 12 provocative maneuvers were included. The Phalen test and the Tinel sign were the 2 most assessed tests (in 22 and 20 studies, respectively). The ROB was unclear or low in 20 studies, and at least 1 item was rated as having high ROB in 11 studies. Based on a meta-analysis of 7 studies (604 patients), the Phalen test had a pooled Sn of 0.57 (95% CI = 0.44-0.68; range = 0.12-0.92) and a pooled Sp of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.52-0.79; range = 0.30-0.95). For the Tinel sign (7 studies, 748 patients), the pooled Sn was 0.45 (95% CI = 0.34-0.57; range = 0.17-0.97) and the pooled Sp was 0.78 (95% CI = 0.60-0.89; range = 0.40-0.92). Other provocative maneuvers were less frequently studied and had conflicting diagnostic accuracies.

CONCLUSION

Meta-analyses are imprecise but suggest that the Phalen test has moderate Sn and Sp, whereas the Tinel test has low Sn and high Sp. Clinicians should combine provocative maneuvers with sensorimotor tests, hand diagrams, and diagnostic questionnaires to achieve better overall diagnostic accuracy rather than relying on individual clinical tests.

IMPACT

Evidence of unclear and high ROB do not support the use of any single provocative maneuver for the diagnosis of CTS. Clinicians should consider a combination of noninvasive clinical diagnostic tests as the first choice for the diagnosis of CTS.

Factors Associated with Change in Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome after Electrodiagnostic Studies

Background: Hand surgeons sometimes place more weight on clinical findings and may not always consider the results of electrodiagnostic studies (EDX) in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The aim of this study is to determine factors associated with a change in diagnosis of CTS after EDX. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all patients with an initial clinical diagnosis of CTS who underwent EDX at our hospital. We identified patients whose diagnosis changed from CTS to non-CTS after EDX and used univariate and multivariate analysis to determine if age, sex, hand dominance, unilateral symptoms, history of diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, haemodialysis, cerebral lesion, cervical lesion, mental disorder, initial diagnosis by a non-hand surgeon, the number of examined items in CTS-6 and a CTS-negative EDX result were associated with a change in diagnosis after EDX. Results: A total of 479 hands with a clinical diagnosis of CTS underwent EDX. The diagnosis was changed to non-CTS in 61 hands (13%) after EDX. Univariate analysis demonstrated that unilateral symptoms, cervical lesion, mental disorder, initial diagnosis by a non-hand surgeon, the number of examined items and a CTS-negative EDX result were significantly associated with a change in diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, only the number of examined items was significantly associated with a change in diagnosis. Conclusions: EDX results were particularly valued in hands where the initial diagnosis was uncertain for CTS. In hands with an initial diagnosis of CTS, the performance of sufficient history-taking and physical examination was more valued at the final diagnosis than EDX results or other aspects of the patient's background. The process of confirming a clear initial clinical diagnosis of CTS using EDX may be of little value for decision-making at the final diagnosis. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Correlation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 Score and Physical Exam Maneuvers With Electrodiagnostic Test Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Blinded Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Although carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) can be diagnosed clinically with the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6) evaluation tool, the relationship between disease severity and CTS-6 score has not been elucidated. The purpose of our study was to determine the correlation of the CTS-6 score and other physical examination maneuvers with the carpal tunnel severity grade by electrodiagnostic testing (EDT). We hypothesized that the CTS-6 score, Durkan test, and Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Testing (SWMT) positively correlate with EDT severity.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 105 consecutive patients who presented to the office with suspected CTS, excluding those with previous surgery, previous EDT from an outside facility, or concomitant neuropathy. Four fellowship-trained hand surgeons obtained the CTS-6 score, time to obtain a positive Durkan compression test, and SWMT of the thumb, index, and middle fingers. All patients were sent for EDT. Hand surgeons were blinded to the results of the EDT, and the electrodiagnosticians were blinded to the clinical data. We used the Bland criteria (0-6) to grade CTS severity on EDT. This grade was compared with the CTS-6 score, Durkan time, and SWMT results.

RESULTS

Using Spearman correlation coefficients, we found a weakly positive correlation between a higher CTS-6 score and a higher severity grade on EDT. The mean CTS-6 score based on EDT grading were the following: (1) 14.8 (grade 0), (2) 16.0 (grade 1), (3) 14.8 (grade 2), (4) 16.7 (grade 3), (5) 18.7 (grade 4), (6) 18.3 (grade 5), and (7) 22.4 (grade 6). We also found a statistically significant association between the SWMT and a higher CTS-6 score as well as a higher severity grade on EDT. Durkan compression test did not appear to correlate with the EDT grade.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTS-6 and SWMT show a positive correlation with EDT severity in CTS on the basis of the Bland criteria. The time to a positive Durkan test did not show any correlation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve as a Prognostic Indicator in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Treated With Local Steroid Injection

PURPOSE

Local steroid injection is an effective treatment modality for carpal tunnel syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the success rate of ultrasonography-guided local steroid injection and determine the prognostic value of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve for steroid injection.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 40 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome whose median nerve CSA was >15 mm² (large-CSA group; n = 16) or ≤15 mm² (small-CSA group; n = 24). The CSA was measured using ultrasonography, and all the patients were treated with ultrasonography-guided corticosteroid injection. Demographic characteristics, symptoms, initial QuickDASH score, Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires, and results of the nerve conduction study were assessed at baseline. Treatment success was defined in this study as the absence of symptom recurrence within the entire follow-up period.

RESULTS

The treatment success rate was 45% (n = 18) after an average follow-up of 16 months. Overall, 11 patients (28%) underwent carpal tunnel release on an average of 11 months after steroid injection. The large-CSA group showed a significantly worse grade of electrodiagnostic testing at baseline than did the small-CSA group; however, there was no significant difference in final Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaires symptom score (1.7 vs 1.8, respectively) and the rate of continued treatment success at the last follow-up (42% vs 50%, respectively). The proportions of patients who required carpal tunnel decompression were 29% and 25% in the small-CSA and large-CSA groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Local steroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome has an overall success rate of 45% after a mean follow-up of 16 months. Preinjection CSA was not associated with whether the steroid injection was considered successful. This indicates that increased median nerve CSA does not preclude the possibility of symptomatic relief after a local steroid injection.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Outcome Metrics in the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the metrics used to assess outcomes after treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines of level I and II randomized controlled trials of treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE electronic database for studies on treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome from January 2008 to January 2018. A total of 105 studies were included in the final analysis. The metrics used to assess outcomes in each studies were collected, compared, and described.

RESULTS

Nearly all the studies used a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to assess outcomes (94%). The most common PROMs used were the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (60%) and the Visual Analog Scale for pain (51%). Electrophysiological testing and physical examination were also commonly used to assess outcomes (50% and 46%, respectively). Cost, sleep, and return to activities of daily living were assessed in a minority of studies (1%, 1%, and 5%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome is commonly defined based on a PROM, highlighting recent efforts to measure outcomes from the patient's perspective. Other patient-centered metrics such as return to work and sleep quality, however, were rarely reported, whereas objective measures such as nerve conduction studies were prevalent. Further work is needed to determine patients' preferred method of measuring outcomes after treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome to inform goal-directed decision-making and treatment.

Ultrasonography for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: correlation of clinical symptoms, cross-sectional areas and electroneuromyography

This study evaluates the usefulness of ultrasonography in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). The cross-sectional area of the median nerve was measured at the forearm and its entry into the carpal tunnel and compared with clinical symptoms and electroneuromyography. A total of 124 patients were examined, 77 patients with clinically confirmed CTS and 47 controls. A significant correlation was found between the ultrasonography cross-sectional area values at entry points into the carpal tunnel and electroneuromyography. The highest sensitivity (87%) and specificity (91%) for different cut-off values (8.5-12.5 mm²) of the cross-sectional area was for 11.5 mm². The use of ultrasonography may provide a quick and reliable differential diagnostic tool for the primary diagnosis of CTS in patients with classical symptoms.Level of evidence: II.

Variation in Use of Electrodiagnostic Testing: Analysis From the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery

PURPOSE

To evaluate factors that predict the use of electrodiagnostic testing (EDS) for patients undergoing carpal tunnel release (CTR).

METHODS

In this cohort study, we analyzed 553 patients who underwent primary CTR from 8 practices between July 1, 2019 and December 1, 2019 by 32 surgeons in the Michigan Collaborative Hand Initiative for Quality in Surgery (M-CHIQS). The M-CHIQS is a collaborative initiative aimed at improving quality in hand surgery. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected, including the 6-item carpal tunnel symptoms scale (CTS-6) scores and EDS timing. Multilevel logistic regression was used to assess practice and surgeon variation in EDS use related to clinical diagnostic criteria.

RESULTS

Of the 553 patients who underwent CTR during the study period, 461 (83.3%) received preoperative EDS. After controlling for patient clinical and demographic characteristics, CTS-6 scores were not associated with receiving any preoperative EDS (lower probability of CTS: odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.59-1.51), preconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS: OR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.73-1.38), or postconsultation EDS (low probability of CTS, OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.77-1.60). For use of any EDS, 9.3% of the variation in testing was explained at the practice level and 31.1% of the variation in testing was explained at the surgeon level.

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in EDS use is explained primarily at the practice and surgeon levels and is not related to patient clinical criteria. We recommend that providers and practices assess their use of preoperative EDS and limit its use to patients with an unclear clinical CTS diagnosis, as stated in current clinical practice guidelines. Likewise, providers should be encouraged to use the CTS-6 before prescribing EDS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Limiting the use of EDS to patients with an unclear clinical diagnosis of CTS will reduce costs and improve patient care by eliminating the discomfort and time associated with this test.

Is there an association between electroneuromyography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome?

Objective  To verify whether there is an association between the results of the severity in electroneuromyography and the positivity in ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods  Sixty-eight patients were included in the study, 61 women and 7 men, with a mean age of 54.4 years. The ultrasound results (positive or negative) were crossed with the results of electroneuromyography (mild, moderate or severe), and the existence of association was verified.

Results  One hundred and thirty-six hands with suspicion or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome were evaluated. Positive ultrasound diagnosis was observed in 72 hands and negative in 64; 123 hands presented positive electroneuromyography for carpal tunnel syndrome, and there were 13 negative results. The severe degree in electroneuromyography was prevalent.

Conclusion  There was a statistically significant association between electroneuromyography and ultrasonography ( p  < 0.05), and ultrasound positivity was higher for more severe levels of carpal tunnel syndrome given by electroneuromyography.

Is there an association between the Hand Diagram and Electrodiagnostic Testing for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome?

Objective  Verify if there is an association between the hand diagram of paresthesia (HDP) and the results of electroneuromyography (ENMG) in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods  A total of 92 people filled in a schematic drawing of the hand with the exact location of the paresthesia (167 hands). The main author classified the diagrams according to the criteria of Katz et al. 5 The results of the HDP were crossed with the positive results of ENMG for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Results  The possible pattern of the HDP was prevalent both in isolation and after crossing with the degrees of ENMG.

Conclusion  There was no association between the HDP and ENMG in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A National Survey to Monitor Knowledge and Operating Methods

The aim of this article was to investigate the knowledge, management, and clinical practice of Italian physiotherapists concerning patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). A national cross-sectional survey consisted of 24 questions was administered from December 2019 until February 2020. A Chi-squared independence test was run to study any difference between subgroups of the sample and responses to the questionnaire. Five hundred and eight respondents completed the survey. Most respondents (n = 225/508; 44.3%) are under 29 years old, female (n = 256/508; 50.4%) and have been working as physiotherapists for less than 5 years (n = 213/508; 41.9%). Most of respondents correctly knows about the cause (n = 455/508, 89.6%), main signs and symptoms of CTS (n = 415/508, 81.70%) and administer education, manual therapy, myofascial techniques and therapeutic exercises (n = 457/508, 89.88%). Three hundred and sixty-four (71.68%) respondents were aware of the influence of psychosocial factors on the patient’s outcomes. The survey showed greater adherence to evidences by physiotherapists holding a master’s degree. The results are mostly comparable with other surveys structured all over the world on the same topic. Italian physiotherapists management of the CTS was not always in line with current evidence. Interventions such as education, manual therapy, therapeutic exercise, nerve and tendon glide techniques are widely used, while the orthotic is only offered by half of the sample.

Electrodiagnostic Testing of Entrapment Neuropathies: A Review of Existing Guidelines

Entrapment neuropathies cover a wide range of isolated nerve injuries along the course of the upper and lower extremity nerves. Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is usually an essential part of the evaluation of entrapment neuropathies, and examinations for the most common entrapment neuropathies, carpal tunnel syndrome and ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, constitute a significant part of the daily work in EDX laboratories. Despite this, guidelines for EDX testing are generally sparse or do not exist for entrapment neuropathies, whereas a wide variety of different techniques are available to the clinical neurophysiologist. This study reviews the existing, more or less, detailed EDX criteria or practice parameters that are suggested by consensus groups in peer-reviewed journals for the most common entrapment neuropathies: carpal tunnel syndrome, ulnar neuropathy at the elbow, common peroneal (fibular) neuropathy at the fibular head, and tibial neuropathy at the tarsal tunnel. It is concluded that future research is needed to develop and refine EDX guidelines in entrapment neuropathies.

Diagnosing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Scales, Questionnaires, and Hand Symptom Diagrams-A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and evaluate research on the accuracy of clinical diagnostic scales, questionnaires, and hand symptom diagrams/maps used for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).

DESIGN

Systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted on January 20, 2020.

STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies that assessed at least 1 diagnostic accuracy property of the scales, questionnaires, and hand symptom diagrams used for the diagnosis of CTS.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Diagnostic accuracy properties were summarized.

RESULTS

Out of 4052 citations after removing duplicates, 21 articles met the inclusion criteria. Twelve articles reported on the diagnostic accuracy of scales and questionnaires, including the Bland questionnaire, Kamath and Stothard questionnaire, 6-item carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms scale (CTS-6), Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire, Wainner clinical prediction rule, and Lo clinical prediction rule. Positive likelihood ratios ranged from 0.94 for the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire to 10.5 for the CTS-6, and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 1.04 to 0.05 for the same diagnostic tools, respectively. Nine studies reported the diagnostic accuracy of the Katz and Stirrat hand symptom diagram. Positive and negative likelihood ratios ranged from 1.42 to 8 and from 0.78 to 0.05, respectively. Only 4 studies had high methodologic quality.

CONCLUSION

Limited evidence supports high accuracy of the CTS-6, Kamath and Stothard questionnaire, and Katz and Stirrat hand symptom diagram. Other scales have lesser and more conflicting evidence. Further high-quality studies are necessary to examine the diagnostic accuracy of these tests to assist ruling in or ruling out CTS. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50(11):622-631. Epub 16 Sep 2020. doi:10.2519/jospt.2020.9599.

A Comparison of 6 Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis

Background: Nerve conduction studies (NCS), ultrasonography (US), Carpal Tunnel Syndrome 6 (CTS-6), Wainner, Lo, and Kamath are clinical diagnostic tools that can be used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Latent class analysis (LCA) is a proven statistical technique that can be used to evaluate diagnostic tests in a lack of a reference standard. Given that there is no accepted reference standard, we elected to perform an LCA to evaluate the 6 clinical diagnostic tests. Methods: One hundred eighty-seven wrists were prospectively evaluated by a board-certified hand surgeon using US, the CTS-6, Wainner, Lo, and Kamath. The NCS were performed by an electrophysiologist according to the standards of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine. The LCA was performed to evaluate individual performance and pairwise combinations of the tests. Results: The NCS demonstrated the highest estimated sensitivity of 97%, and the Wainner had the highest estimated specificity of 97%. Alternatively, the Lo had the lowest estimated sensitivity (36%), and NCS had the lowest estimated specificity (40%). When evaluating pairwise combinations, positive US and NCS demonstrated the highest overall sensitivity at 86%, and negative US and NCS had a specificity of 83%. Conclusions: There is no perfect clinical diagnostic test, with the 6 clinical diagnostic tests having differing sensitivities and specificities. Pairwise combinations of the test can be used to complement one another.

Outcome of carpal tunnel decompression with pre-surgical diagnosis determined on general practitioner assessment and nerve conduction study

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is key to successful treatment. At our center a treatment pathway was recently established for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Within this pathway patients are assessed by their community practitioner. Patients who fail to improve with conservative treatment and have a positive nerve conduction study are put forward for surgery without a specialist assessment. Recent literature has shown nerve conduction study may produce a high rate of false-positive results when used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression surgery in patients whose diagnoses was based on a community practitioner assessment and positive nerve conduction study.

METHODS

All patients who had carpal tunnel release surgery between August 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018 at our center were screened for eligibility. Data from hospital records and a standardized telephone questionnaire was used to assess surgical outcome.

RESULTS

The final study population included 128 operated hands. The mean follow up time after surgery was 9.6 months. We found 79% of patients reported significant improvement of their symptoms following carpal tunnel release. The overall complication rate was 2.3%.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated good outcomes from carpal tunnel decompressive surgery are possible in a cohort of patients whose diagnosis was made on the basis of a positive nerve conduction study and community practitioner assessment.

Variation in Nonsurgical Services for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Across a Large Integrated Health Care System

PURPOSE

To evaluate facility-level variation in the use of services for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) receiving care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

A national cohort of VHA patients diagnosed with CTS during fiscal year 2013 was divided into nonsurgical and operative treatment groups for comparison. We assessed the use of 5 types of CTS-related services (electrodiagnostic studies [EDS], imaging, steroid injection, oral steroids, and therapeutic modalities) in the prediagnosis and postdiagnosis periods before any operative intervention at the patient and facility levels.

RESULTS

Among 72,599 patients newly diagnosed with CTS, 5,666 (7.8%) received carpal tunnel release within 12 months. The remaining 66,933 (92.2%) were in the nonsurgical group. Therapeutic modalities and EDS were the most commonly employed services after the index diagnosis and had large facility-level variation in use. At the facility level, the use of therapeutic modalities ranged from 0% to 93% in the operative group (mean, 32%) compared with 1% to 67% (mean, 30%) in the nonsurgical group. The use of EDS in the postdiagnosis period ranged from 0% to 100% (mean, 59%) in the operative treatment group and 0% to 55% (mean, 26%) in the nonsurgical group at the facility level.

CONCLUSIONS

There is wide facility variation in the use of services for CTS among patients receiving operative and nonsurgical treatment. Care delivered by facilities with the highest and lowest rates of service use may suggest overuse and underuse, respectively, of nonsurgical CTS services and a lack of consideration of individual patient factors in making health care decisions regarding use.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Surgeons must understand the degree of treatment variability for CTS, comprehend the ramifications of large variation in reimbursement and waste in the health care system, and become involved in devising strategies to optimize hand care across all phases of care.